Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: Rethinking Party System Institutionalization in Asia
- 2 The Antidemocratic Potential of Party System Institutionalization: Malaysia as Morality Tale?
- 3 Institutionalized Succession and Hegemonic Party Cohesion in Singapore
- 4 Party System Institutionalization in Japan
- 5 Long in the Making: Taiwan’s Institutionalized Party System
- 6 The Making and Unmaking of the Communist Party and Single-Party System of Vietnam
- 7 The Institutionalization of the Communist Party and the Party System in China
- 8 Party System Institutionalization in India
- 9 Party and Party System Institutionalization in Cambodia
- 10 Explaining Party System Institutionalization in Indonesia
- 11 South Korea’s Weakly Institutionalized Party System
- 12 Thailand’s Feckless Parties and Party System: A Path-Dependent Analysis
- 13 Party and Party System Institutionalization in the Philippines
- 14 Party System Institutionalization: Reflections Based on the Asian Cases
- Index
- References
2 - The Antidemocratic Potential of Party System Institutionalization: Malaysia as Morality Tale?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: Rethinking Party System Institutionalization in Asia
- 2 The Antidemocratic Potential of Party System Institutionalization: Malaysia as Morality Tale?
- 3 Institutionalized Succession and Hegemonic Party Cohesion in Singapore
- 4 Party System Institutionalization in Japan
- 5 Long in the Making: Taiwan’s Institutionalized Party System
- 6 The Making and Unmaking of the Communist Party and Single-Party System of Vietnam
- 7 The Institutionalization of the Communist Party and the Party System in China
- 8 Party System Institutionalization in India
- 9 Party and Party System Institutionalization in Cambodia
- 10 Explaining Party System Institutionalization in Indonesia
- 11 South Korea’s Weakly Institutionalized Party System
- 12 Thailand’s Feckless Parties and Party System: A Path-Dependent Analysis
- 13 Party and Party System Institutionalization in the Philippines
- 14 Party System Institutionalization: Reflections Based on the Asian Cases
- Index
- References
Summary
To an extent unusual for Southeast Asia, parties structure Malaysian political life. These parties perform all the functions they are supposed to: they represent and organize groups in society, channel and express interests, and significantly structure social and economic as well as political life. Nearly all those parties most active and supported now are long-standing and organizationally solid; all claim a reasonably high degree of institutionalization. Moreover, by the terms of the literature engaged here, Malaysia has a strongly institutionalized party system, or “set of patterned interactions in the competition among parties.” Malaysian parties at least officially accept and follow established rules in electoral contests; the ranks of primary contenders are reasonably stable, rooted in society and organizational life, and ideologically consistent; and the same set of parties tends to hold its niche in government. Though parties themselves suffer crises, the systems holds – and generally, the same party or a dominant faction regenerates post-crisis and returns to the fray within the span of a single election cycle. Based solely on its lattice of parties, the Malaysian polity seems well positioned to support a democratic government: although party system institution need not yield democratization in any teleological way, party strengthening is commonly presumed to be a path toward developing and buttressing representative, accountable institutions.
And yet Malaysia could hardly be considered a liberal democracy. Malaysia and Singapore “are the dogs that haven’t barked”: their dominant party systems have not yielded to more competitive alternatives, as their ruling parties have remained unified overall, and their regimes highly resilient. Parties in Malaysia observe established rules for electoral competition to an extent, but not only are these rules arguably skewed (e.g., by limits on free speech and assembly) but also breaches by the dominant coalition go unchecked.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Party System Institutionalization in AsiaDemocracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past, pp. 25 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
2004. The Internet, Reformasi and Democratisation in Malaysia. In (Ed.), The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform, pp. 79–104. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
1997. Divide and Rule: The Roots of Race Relations in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Social Analysis (INSAN).Google Scholar
. 1985. Barisan Nasional Dominance and Opposition Fragmentation: The Failure of Attempts to Create Opposition Cooperation in the Malaysian Party System. Asian Profile 13(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
, and . 2008. Public Support for Democratic Governance in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science 16(3): 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The 1996 UMNO Party Election: “Two for the Show.”Pacific Affairs 70(3): 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Malaysia’s Resilient Pseudodemocracy. Journal of Democracy 12(1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. New Uncertainties for an Old Pseudo-Democracy: The Case of Malaysia. Comparative Politics 37(1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. PBDS and Ethnicity in Sarawak Politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia 26(4): 512–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Introduction: Political Elections as Popular Culture. In (Ed.), Elections as Popular Culture in Asia, pp. 1–21. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1996. Malaysia: Do Elections Make a Difference? In (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 114–135. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Political Crisis and Reform in Malaysia. In (Ed.), The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform, pp. 105–129. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
. 1999. Looking for Reformasi: The Discursive Dynamics of the Reformasi Movement and Its Prospects as a Political Project. Indonesia and the Malay World 27(77): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1980. Malay Politics in Malaysia: A Study of UMNO and PAS. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books (Asia).Google Scholar
. 2006. The Malay Electorate in 2004: Reversing the 1999 Result? In and (Eds.), Malaysia: Recent Trends and Challenges, pp. 132–156. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Demise of Local Government Elections and Urban Politics. In and (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 49–70. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Political Change in Malaysia: The Role of Semangat 46. Asian Survey 31(8): 712–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. UMNO Leaders and Malay Rulers: The Erosion of a Special Relationship. Pacific Affairs 68(2): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Tradition, UMNO and Political Succession in Malaysia. Third World Quarterly 19(2): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Developing Democracies in Southeast Asia: Theorizing the Role of Parties and Elections. In , , and (Eds.), Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis, pp. 80–101. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Malaysia’s “Presidential Premier”: Explaining Mahathir’s Dominance. In (Ed.), Reflections: The Mahathir Years, pp. 67–76. Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Program, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.Google Scholar
1995. Statist Democracy and the Limits to Civil Society in Malaysia. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 33: 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. The Syncretic State and the Structuring of Oppositional Politics in Malaysia. In (Ed.), Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia, pp. 128–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1996. Elections’ Janus Face: Limitations and Potential in Malaysia. In (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 90–113. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1995. Towards a Model of Illiberal Democracy. In et al. (Eds.), Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, pp. 163–167. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Democracy and Authoritarianism in Malaysia since 1957: Class, Ethnicity and Changing Capitalism. In (Ed.), Democratization in Southeast and East Asia, pp. 46–76. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
. 1997. Corak Pengundian di Kalangan Pengundi Cina di Kawasan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Seri Kembangan: Di antara Straight-ticket Voting dan Split-ticket Voting. Academic Exercise, Jabatan Sains Politik, Fakulti Sains Kemasyarakatan dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Google Scholar
1986. Symbols of Separatism: Ethnicity and Status Politics in Contemporary Malaysia. In (Ed.), Ethnicity and Ethnic Relations in Malaysia, pp. 28–46. DeKalb: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Making the System Work: The Election Commission. In and (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 249–291. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Understanding Politics in Sabah and Sarawak: An Overview. Kajian Malaysia 15(12): 1–14.Google Scholar
. 2007. Engaging the 2004 General Election in Malaysia: Contrasting Roles and Goals. In (Ed.), Elections as Popular Culture in Asia, pp. 115–138. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1979. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control. World Politics 31(3): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America. In and (Eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, pp. 1–34. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy 7(4): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1977. Legislatures and Divided Societies: The Malaysian Parliament and Multi-Ethnicity. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(2): 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Examining the Electoral Roll. In and (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 292–315. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2005. Elections and Democracy in Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. Party Institutionalization in New Democracies. Party Politics 8(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Authoritarian Statism and Strategies for Democratisation: Malaysia in the 1980s. In (Ed.), Partisan Scholarship: Essays in Honour of Renato Constantino, pp. 233–251. Manila: Journal of Contemporary Asia Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2000. Act of Betrayal: The Snuffing Out of Local Democracy in Malaysia. Aliran Monthly 20(4): 23–25.Google Scholar
. 1990. The Rise of State Authoritarianism in Malaysia. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 22(3): 32–42.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 1996. Introduction: Elections and Politics in Southeast Asia. In The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 1–11. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.
1971. Politics in a Plural Society: A Study of Non-Communal Political Parties in West Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. Original edition, Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
2004. Malaysia: Construction of Counterhegemonic Narratives and Agendas. In (Ed.), Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, pp. 259–291. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2006. Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009. Edging toward a New Politics in Malaysia: Civil Society at the Gate?Asian Survey 49(5): 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Shifting Terrain: Elections in the Mahathir Era. In (Ed.), Reflections: The Mahathir Years, pp. 119–133. Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Program, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.Google Scholar
. 2002. The Structure of the Media Industry: Implications for Democracy. In and (Eds.), Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, pp. 111–137. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
. 1989. Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society. In , , and (Eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries, Vol. 3: Asia, pp. 347–381. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Asia Times Online, May 19, 1999. Available from .
Malaysiakini, Nov. 16, 2006. Available from
- 4
- Cited by