The challenge of universality – the League of Nations and the United Nations

Alison Duxbury

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921445.004

2 - The challenge of universality – the League of Nations and the United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2011

Alison Duxbury

Show author details

Alison Duxbury: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Peace, democracy and universality

Given the experience of the previous five years and the events that were to unfold in the next two decades, perhaps the most melancholy words in international law are located in the preamble to the Covenant of the League of Nations adopted in 1919 at the Paris Peace Conference. Like the UN, the aim behind the creation of the League was to ‘promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security’. This was to be realised through the establishment of an organisation that would facilitate ‘open, just and honourable relations between nations’ and enable states to settle their disputes without recourse to war. The main players at both Versailles and at the San Francisco Conference were the Great Powers (differently composed) and their attitude towards the way in which a world organisation should be constructed varied between a belief that all (or at least most) states in the international community should be admitted and the conviction that conditions needed to be prescribed in the founding document. Both approaches were grounded in the belief that either an expansive or a restricted membership would be the best method of ensuring that each organisation could fulfil its primary function – the preservation of peace.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Participation of States in International Organisations
The Role of Human Rights and Democracy
, pp. 60 - 123

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921445.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Tod, Lindberg, ‘The Treaty of the Democratic Peace: What the World Needs Now’ (2007) 12(21) The Weekly Standard.Google Scholar

Owen, John M., ‘International Law and the “Liberal Peace”’, in Fox, Gregory and Roth, Brad (eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 343.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leonard, Woolf, ‘An International Legislature’, in Woolf, Leonard S. (ed.), The Framework of a Lasting Peace (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1917), p. 57.Google Scholar

‘Records of the Fourth Assembly, Meetings of the Committees, Minutes of the Sixth Committee, Report of the Second Sub-Committee of the Sixth Committee’ (1923) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 19, 34.

‘Records of the Fifth Assembly, Meetings of the Committees, Report of the Sub-Committee to the Sixth Committee’ (1924) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 29, 24.

‘Records of the Fourth Assembly, Meetings of the Committees, Minutes of the Sixth Committee’ (1923) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 19 at 15 (Cook, Australia).

‘Records of the Special Session of the Assembly, Minutes of the First Committee’ (1926) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 42, 46.

‘Letter from German Government to the Secretary-General of the League, 12 December 1924’ (1925) L.N. Off. J. 326.

‘Records of the Fifteenth Assembly, Sixth Committee’ (1934) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 130 at 97–8.

‘Records of the Fifteenth Assembly, Sixth Committee’ (1934) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 130 at 17–20.

‘Records of the Fifteenth Assembly, Sixth Committee’ (1934) L.N. Off. J., Supp. 130 at 22.

Lord, Robert Cecil, ‘Final Assembly of the League at Geneva, 8 April 1946’, as quoted in Cecil, Robert, All the Way (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1949), p. 174.Google Scholar

Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217 at 273

EC Guidelines on the Recognition of New States in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, 16 December 1991 (1993) 92 ILR 173 at 173–4.

Opinion No. 5 on the Recognition of the Republic of Croatia by the European Community and its Member States, 11 January 1992 (1993) 92 ILR 179

Observations on Croatian Constitutional Law (Comments on the Republic of Croatia's Constitutional Law of 4 December 1991, as Amended on 8 May 1992), 4 July 1992 (1993) 92 ILR 209.

Opinion No. 8, 4 July 1992, para. 3 (1993) 92 ILR 199 at 200.

Abdullah, El-Erian, ‘Relations between States and Inter-Governmental Organizations’ [1963] 2 Y.B Int'l L. Comm. 159 at 167Google Scholar

‘Extracts relating to Article 6 of the Charter of the United Nations’, in Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs, Supp. 6 (1979–84), vol. I, p. 130.

‘The Question of Race Conflict in South Africa’ (1961) Yearbook of the United Nations 108 at 108–113.

Opinion No. 10, 4 July 1992, para. 5 (1993) 92 ILR 206 at 208.

Opinion No. 9, 4 July 1992, para. 4 (1993) 92 ILR 203 at 205.

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (Merits), 26 February 2007 (2007) 46 ILM 188 at 210

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia) (Preliminary Objections) [1996] ICJ Rep. 595 at 617.

‘Question of the Representation of China’ (1950) Yearbook of the United Nations 421 at 430.

‘Statement by the Legal Counsel Submitted to the President of the General Assembly at its Request’ (1970) U.N. Jurid. Y.B. 169 at 170

‘UN Scorns Haitian Credentials’, The Globe and Mail (Canada), 22 September 1992

‘Myanmar 1990 Election Winners Want Junta's UN Seat’, The Guardian (United Kingdom), 10 September 2008

Gilbert, Murray, ‘Covenant and Charter’ in ,National Peace Council London, The United Nations Charter: A Commentary (National Peace Council London, 1945), p. 11.Google Scholar