Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:40:32.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Augustine’s “Illumination” Theory as the Natural Participation of the Human Mind

Correcting Bonaventure and Gilson via Plotinus and Marius Victorinus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2024

Douglas Hedley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Daniel J. Tolan
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I show that Augustine’s “divine illumination theory of knowledge” is merely his belief that the human mind is capable of intellectual cognition because it naturally “participates” in the Divine Mind, as its image. Consequently, the claim that Augustine thought the human mind must be enlightened by special divine assistance in ordinary (nonmystical) intellectual cognition is erroneous. That is true of the whole of his writing career: earlier works such as On the Teacher and the Confessions agree with his presentation in On the Trinity 12. This resolution of a long-standing debate about how to interpret Augustine becomes possible when we pay careful attention to the ancient philosophical problems “illumination” is meant to resolve, and when we use Plotinus and the early Christian Neoplatonist Marius Victorinus to interpret his vocabulary and claims.  The recovery of this late ancient context greatly clarifies Augustine’s epistemological theory and reveals its explanatory power.

Type
Chapter
Information
Participation in the Divine
A Philosophical History, From Antiquity to the Modern Era
, pp. 128 - 161
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Armstrong, A. H., trans. 1966–88. Plotinus: Enneads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry, trans. 1991. Augustine: Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Mary T., trans. 1981. Marius Victorinus: Theological Treatises on the Trinity. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd, ed. and trans. with George Boys-Stones, John Dillon, et al. 2018. Plotinus: The Enneads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., trans. 1976. Plato: Meno. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hayes, Zachary, trans. 2006. Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ. Vol. 4. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Hill, Edmund, trans. 1991. Augustine: On the Trinity. Brooklyn, NY: New City Press.Google Scholar
King, Peter, trans. 1995. Augustine: Against the Academics and On the Teacher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, trans. 2002. Mind and Knowledge. Vol. 3 of The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Boniface, trans. 2008. Augustine: Responses to Miscellaneous Questions. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas, trans. 1993. Augustine: On Free Choice of the Will. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ayres, Lewis. 2010. Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 2005. “Les Catégories et les Catégories,” in Les “Catégories” et leur histoire, ed. Bruun, Otto and Corti, Lorenzo, 64–5. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Vrin.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. 1976. “St. Bonaventure’s Doctrine of Illumination: Reactions Medieval and Modern,” in Bonaventure & Aquinas: Enduring Philosophers, ed. Robert, W. Shahan and Francis, J. Kovach, 5767. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Bubacz, Bruce. 1980. “Augustine’s Illumination Theory and Epistemic Structuring.” Augustinian Studies 11, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Miles. 1987. “Wittgenstein and Augustine: De Magistro.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 61, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Sarah. 2013. Perception, Sensibility, and Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic-Platonic Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byers, Sarah. 2020. “Love, Will, and the Intellectual Ascents,” in The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s Confessions, ed. Toom, Tarmo, 154–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byers, Sarah. 2022. ‘“Consubstantiality” as a Philosophical-Theological Problem: Victorinus’ Hylomorphic Model of God and His “Correction” by Augustine.’ Scottish Journal of Theology 75.1, 1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, Nello. 1994. “Le fonti cristiana della dottrina trinitaria nei primi Dialoghi di S. Agostino.” Augustinianum 34, 253312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, Nello. 2002. “La Presenza di Mario Vittorino nella riflessione trinitaria di S. Agostino.” Augustinianum 42.2, 261313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, Christopher. 2006. Bonaventure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fokin, Alexey. 2017. “Act of Vision as an Analogy of the Proceeding of the Intellect from the One in Plotinus and of the Son and the Holy Spirit from the Father in Marius Victorinus and Augustine,” in Studia Patristica: Papers presented at the Seventeenth International Conference on Patristics held in Oxford 2015, vol. 75.1, ed. Vincent, Markus, 5567. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. 1960. The Christian Philosophy of Saint Augustine, trans. L. E. M. Lynch. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gurtler, Gary. 2015. Ennead IV.4.30–45 and IV.5: Problems Concerning the Soul. Translation, with an Introduction, and Commentary. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1954. “Marius Victorinus et Alcuin.” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 21, 519.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1962. “L’image de le Trinité dans l’âme chez Victorinus et chez saint Augustin.” Studia Patristica vol. 6, 409–42. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1971. Marius Victorinus: Recherches sur sa vie et ses oeuvres. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 2005. “Les càtegories chez les Pères de l’Église latins,” in Les “Càtegories” et leur histoire, ed. Bruun, Otto and Corti, Lorenzo, 121–33. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Vrin.Google Scholar
King, Peter. 2014. “Augustine on Knowledge,” in The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, ed. Meconi, David and Stump, Eleanor, 142–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lössl, Josef. 2012. “Augustine’s Use of Aristotle’s Categories in ‘De Trinitate’ in Light of the History of the Latin Text of the Categories before Boethius,” in Le “De Trinitate” de saint Augustin: Exégèse, logique et noétique. Actes du colloque international de Bordeaux, 16–19 juin 2010, ed. Bermon, Emmanuel and O’Daly, Gerard, 107–29. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. 2012. “Revisiting the Intelligibles: The Theory of Illumination in De trinitate, xii.” Medioevo: Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale 37, 137–63.Google Scholar
Miner, Robert. 2007. “Augustinian Recollection,” Augustinian Studies 38.2, 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Ronald H. 1969. The Light of the Mind: St. Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Nawar, Tamer. 2015. “Augustine on the Varieties of Understanding and Why There is No Learning from Words.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3.1, 131.Google Scholar
Nawar, Tamer. 2019. “Augustine’s Defence of Knowledge Against the Sceptics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 56, 215–65.Google Scholar
Nawar, Tamer. 2020. “Augustine on Active Perception, Awareness, and Representation.” Phronesis 66.1, 84110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Christopher. 2013. “How Plotinus’ Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Enn. IV.4.18.1–9.” Phronesis 58.3, 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noone, Timothy. 2014. “Divine Illumination,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Pasnau, Robert, 369–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Stephen. 2020. “Avicenna’s Emanated Abstraction.” Philosopher’s Imprint 20.10, 126.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 1995. “Henry of Ghent and the Twilight of Divine Illumination.” Review of Metaphysics 49.1, 4975.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2020. “Divine Illumination.” Last modified Feb. 10, 2020. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/illumination/.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. 1994. Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, John. 2022. “Plotinus and Christian Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, 2nd ed., ed. Gerson, Lloyd, 386414. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Frederic M. 1984. “Light and the Active Intellect in Alexander and Plotinus.” Hermes 112.2, 239–48.Google Scholar
Schuetzinger, Caroline Eve. 1960. The German Controversy on Saint Augustine’s Illumination Theory. New York: Pageant Press.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. 2011. Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×