Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:28:09.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Christians and the Invention of Paganism in the Late Roman Empire

from Part II - The Construction of New Religious Identities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Thomas Jürgasch
Affiliation:
scientific assistant at the Faculty of Theology, University of Freiburg
Michele Renee Salzman
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Marianne Sághy
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Rita Lizzi Testa
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Generally, accounts of the relations between Christians and pagans in the late ancient Roman Empire start from an implicit assumption. According to this assumption the Christians and pagans formed two distinct groups, which, although interacting with each other in various ways, existed – so to speak – as two separate and mutually independent “entities.”

These “entities,” so it appears, had their own characteristic features, rituals, and beliefs, or – to put it more generally – their respective ways of interpreting and dealing with the world. All of these elements formed what we nowadays might call the group identities of Christians and pagans. And it is, among other things, these identities, which suggest that in talking about Christians and pagans we are dealing with two distinct groups that as such existed in the “real world.” Starting from this hypothesis, investigations of the two groups and their relations usually take account of issues such as whether these relations were rather hostile or friendly, or how the Christians related to the pagan Roman Empire, and so on.

Certainly, such an approach is apparently quite reasonable and useful with regard to many contexts and investigations pertaining to the relations between Christians and pagans. And yet, considered from a particular point of view, this way of looking at the subject proves rather questionable. To show why this is the case, I will develop an argument along the following lines: There is an important sense in which Christians and pagans did depend on each other and in which they cannot be considered as two discrete and separate groups. As shall become evident, this dependence, or rather “interdependence,” lies on a conceptual level. That is to say that the concepts of what it meant to be pagan and of what it meant to be Christian in the late ancient Roman Empire can only be understood in relation to each other. To expound more clearly what this conceptual interdependence consists in and which consequences arise from this idea, I will make a second point closely related to the first one. It concerns the much-discussed question of why, in the fourth century, Christian authors in the western part of the empire actually started using the term “pagan,” applying it in the sense of “non-Christian.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Pagans and Christians in Late Antique Rome
Conflict, Competition, and Coexistence in the Fourth Century
, pp. 115 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assmann, J. Das kollektive Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen (Munich, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, L. “Articulating Identity,” in L. Ayres, Casiday, A., Louth, A., and Young, F., eds., The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature (Cambridge, 2004), 414–63.Google Scholar
Ayres, L. Nicaea and Its Legacy (Oxford, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J. Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (Tübingen, 1934).Google Scholar
Bélanger, S.À la croisée des chemins: les premiers chrétiens et leur quête identitaire.” CEA XLIV (2007): 137–69.Google Scholar
Bickel, E.pagani: Kaiseranbeter in den Laren-Kapellen der pagi urbani im Rom Neros und des Apostels Petrus.” RMP 97 (1954):1–47.Google Scholar
Brown, P. “Pagan,” in Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P., and Grabar, O., eds., Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World (Harvard, 1999), 625.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. The Last Pagans of Rome (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Chuvin, P. “Sur l'origine de l'equitation paganus = païens,” in Mary, L., ed., Impies et païens entre Antiquité et Moyen Âge (Paris, 2002), 7–16.Google Scholar
Cicero, , De domo sua, Clark, A. C. and Peterson, W., eds., M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, Vol. 5 (Oxford, 2006 [repr.]).Google Scholar
Codex Theodosianus. Theodosiani libri XVI cum constitutionibus Sirmondianis, 3 Volumes, Th. Mommsen, P. M. Meyer, and P. Krüger, eds. (Hildesheim, 1999–2002).
Colpe, C. “Die Ausbildung des Heidenbegriffs von Israel zur Apologetik und das Zweideutigwerden des Christentums,” in Faber, R. and Schesier, R., eds., Die Restauration der Götter. Antike Religion und Neo-Paganismus (Würzburg, 1986), 61–87.Google Scholar
Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (CIL), T. Mommsen and F. W. Ritschl et al., eds. (Berlin, 1863 ff.).
Demougeot, É. “Remarques sur l'emploi de paganus,” in Arslan, E., ed., Studi in onore di Aristide Calderini e Roberto Paribeni 1 (Milan, 1956), 337–50.Google Scholar
De Vaan, M. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Fredouille, J. C.Heiden.” RAC 13 (Stuttgart, 1986): 1121–2.Google Scholar
Galsterer, H. “Pagus,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Der neue Pauly, Vol. IX (Stuttgart, 2000), 146–7.Google Scholar
Glare, P. G. W., ed., “pagus,” Oxford Latin Dictionary (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
Hedrick, C. W. History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity (Austin, 2000).Google Scholar
Holmberg, B. “Understanding the First Hundred Years of Christian Identity,” in Holmberg, B., ed., Exploring Early Christian Identity (Tübingen, 2008), 2–32.Google Scholar
Internationale Thesaurus-Kommission, ed., Thesaurus Linguae Latinae, Vol. X,1 (Leipzig, 1992).
Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. S., eds., A Latin Dictionary, Founded on Andrews’ Edition of Freund's Latin Dictionary (Oxford, 1969).Google Scholar
Lieu, J. Image and Reality: The Jews in the World of the Christians in the Second Century (Edinburgh, 1996).Google Scholar
Lieu, J. Neither Jew nor Greek? Constructing Early Christian Identity (Edinburgh, 2002).Google Scholar
Lieu, J. Christian Identity in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World (Oxford, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, R. The End of Ancient Christianity (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
Mason, S.Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History.” JSJ 38 (2007): 457–512.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, J. Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions. The Church 450–680 AD (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Miles, R., ed. Constructing Identities in Late Antiquity (London, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. A. History of the Later Roman Empire AD 284–64: The Transformation of the Ancient World (Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar
Mohrmann, C.Encore une fois: paganus.” VigChr 6 (1952): 109–21.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. Römisches Staatsrecht III (Darmstadt, 1963).Google Scholar
North, J. “The Development of Religious Pluralism,” in J. North, Lieu, J., and Rajak, T., eds., The Jews among Pagans and Christians in the Roman Empire (London, 1992), 174–93.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, J. J.Paganus.” CIF 31(1977): 163–9.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, J. J.The Demise of Paganism.” Traditio 35 (1979): 45–88.Google Scholar
Opelt, I.Griechische und lateinische Bezeichnungen der Nichtchristen. Ein terminologischer Versuch.” VigChr 19 (1965): 1–22.Google Scholar
Paravicini, W. Die Wahrheit der Historiker (Munich, 2000).Google Scholar
Pharr, C. The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions: A translation with Commentary, Glossary, and Bibliography (Princeton, 1952).Google Scholar
Pokorny, J. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, Vol. 1 (Munich, 2002).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Caesar, , Bellum Alexandrinum, Giomini, R., ed. (Rome, 1956).Google Scholar
Runesson, A. “Inventing Christian Identity: Paul, Ignatius, and Theodosius I,” in Holmberg, B., ed., Exploring Early Christian Identity (Tübingen, 2008), 59–92.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R.The Evidence for the Conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity in Book 16 of the ‘Theodosian Code.’Hist. 42, no. 3 (1993): 362–78.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. “Pagans and Christians,” in Harvey, S. A. and Hunter, D. G., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies (Oxford, 2008): 186–202.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. Hellenische Identität in der Spätantike. Pagane Autoren und ihr Unbehagen an der eigenen Zeit (Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar
Straub, J. “Personale und kollektive Identität. Zur Analyse eines theoretischen Begriffs,” in Assmann, A. and Friese, H., eds., Identitäten (Frankfurt am Main, 1998), 73–104.Google Scholar
Straub, J. “Identität,” in Jaeger, F. and Liebsch, B., eds., Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften, Vol. 1 (Stuttgart, 2004): 277–303.Google Scholar
Theißen, G. A Theory of Primitive Christian Religion (London, 1999).Google Scholar
Von Stuckrad, K. “‘Christen’ und ‘Nichtchristen’ in der Antike. Von religiös konstruierten Grenzen zur diskursorientieren Religionswissenschaft,” in Hutter, M., Klein, W., and Vollmer, U., eds., Hairesis. Festschrift für Karl Hoheisel zum 65. Geburtstag (Münster, 2002), 184–202.Google Scholar
Williams, R. “Does it Make Sense to Speak of pre-Nicene Orthodoxy?” in Williams, R., ed., The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick (Cambridge, 1989), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×