Neurobiological Perspectives

doi:10.1017/9781108938891.017

Lee, M. S. Y., Bell, G. L., and Caldwell, M. W., The origin of snake feeding. Nature, 400 (1999), 655–659.Google Scholar

Reeder, T. W., Townsend, T. M., Mulcahy, D. G., et al., Integrated analyses resolve conflicts over squamate reptile phylogeny and reveal unexpected placements for fossil taxa. PLoS ONE, 10 (2015), e0118199.Google Scholar

Hsiang, A. Y., Field, D. J., Webster, T. H., et al., The origin of snakes: revealing the ecology, behavior, and evolutionary history of early snakes using genomics, phenomics, and the fossil record. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15 (2015), 87.Google Scholar

Yi, H. and Norell, M. A., The burrowing origin of modern snakes. Science Advances, 1 (2015), e1500743.Google Scholar

Yi, H. and Norell, M., The bony labyrinth of Platecarpus (Squamata: Mosasauria) and aquatic adaptations in squamate reptiles. Palaeoworld, 28 (2019), 550–561.Google Scholar

Palci, A., Hutchinson, M. N., Caldwell, M. W., and Lee, M. S. Y., The morphology of the inner ear of squamate reptiles and its bearing on the origin of snakes. Royal Society Open Science, 4 (2017), 170685.Google Scholar

Cuthbertson, R. S., Maddin, H. C., Holmes, R. B., and Anderson, J. S., The braincase and endosseous labyrinth of Plioplatecarpus peckensis (Mosasauridae, Plioplatecarpinae), with functional implications for locomotor behavior. Anatomical Record, 298 (2015), 1597–1611.Google Scholar

Georgi, J. A., Semicircular canal morphology as evidence of locomotor environment in amniotes. Unpublished PhD thesis (Stony Brook, NY: The Graduate School, Stony Brook University, 2008).Google Scholar

Gauthier, J. A., Kearney, M., Maisano, J. A., Rieppel, O., and Behlke, A. D. B., Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 53 (2012), 3–308.Google Scholar

Romer, A. S., Osteology of the Reptiles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Evans, S. E., The lepidosaurian ear: variations on a theme. In Clack, J. A., Fay, R. R. and Popper, A. N., eds., Evolution of the Vertebrate Ear – Evidence from the Fossil Record. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 59 (New York: Springer International Publishing, 2016). pp. 245–84.Google Scholar

Christensen, C. B., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Brandt, C., and Madsen, P. T, Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python, Python regius . Journal of Experimental Biology, 215 (2012), 331–342.Google Scholar

Müller, J., Bickelmann, C., and Sobral, G., The evolution and fossil history of sensory perception in amniote vertebrates. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 46 (2018), 495–519.Google Scholar

Burbrink, F. T., Grazziotin, F. G., Pyron, R. A., et al., Interrogating genomic-scale data for Squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Systematic Biology, 69 (2020), 502–520.Google Scholar

Zaher, H., Murphy, R. W., Arredondo, J. C., et al., Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLoS ONE, 14 (2019), e0216148.Google Scholar

Greene, H., Snakes: The Evolution of Mystery in Nature (Oakland: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Miller, M. R., The cochlear duct of lizards and snakes. American Zoologist, 6 (1966), 421–429.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Jared, C., et al., Visual system evolution and the nature of the ancestral snake. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28 (2015), 1309–1320.Google Scholar

Konishi, T., Caldwell, M. W., Nishimura, T., Sakurai, K., and Tanoue, K., A new halisaurine mosasaur (Squamata: Halisaurinae) from Japan: the first record in the western Pacific realm and the first documented insights into binocular vision in mosasaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 14 (2016), 809–839.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Gower, D. J., Rasmussen, A. R., et al., Spectral diversification and trans-Species allelic polymorphism during the land-to-sea transition in snakes. Current Biology, 30 (2020), 2608–2615.Google Scholar

Wever, E. G., The Reptile Ear: Its Structure and Function (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Palci, A., Hutchinson, M. N., Caldwell, M. W., Scanlon, J. D., and Lee, M. S. Y., Palaeoecological inferences for the fossil Australian snakes Yurlunggur and Wonambi (Serpentes, Madtsoiidae). Royal Society Open Science, 5 (2018), 172012.Google Scholar

Cundall, D., Wallach, V., and Rossman, D. A., The systematic relationships of the snake genus Anomochilus . Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109 (1993), 275–299.Google Scholar

Conrad, J. L., Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 310 (2008), 1–182.Google Scholar

Wiens, J. J., Kuczynski, C. A., Smith, S. A., et al., Branch lengths, support, and congruence: testing the phylogenomicapproach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Systematic Biology, 57 (2008), 420–431.Google Scholar

Pyron, R. A., Burbrink, F. T., and Wiens, J. J., A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(2013), 93.Google Scholar

Figueroa, A., McKelvy, A. D., Grismer, L. L., Bell, C. D., and Lailvaux, S. P., A species-levelphylogeny of extant snakes with description of a new colubrid subfamily and genus. PLoS ONE, 11 (2016), e0161070.Google Scholar

Miralles, A., Marin, L., Markus, D., et al., Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (2018), 1782–1793.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Haas, G., Anatomical observations on the head of Liotyphlops albirostris (Typhlopidae, Ophidia). Acta Zoologica, 45 (1964), 1–62.Google Scholar

Rieppel, O. and Maisano, J. A., The skull of the rare Malaysian snake Anomochilus leonardi Smith, based on high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 149 (200), 671–685.Google Scholar

Olori, J. C., Digital endocasts of the cranial cavity and osseous labyrinth of the burrowing snake Uropeltis woodmasoni (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae). Copeia, 2010 (2010), 14–26.Google Scholar

O’Shea, M., Boas and Pythons of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Sanders, K. L., Mumpuni, A. Hamidy, J. J. Head, , and Gower, D. J., Phylogeny and divergence times of filesnakes (Acrochordus): inferences from morphology, fossils and three molecular loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56 (2010), 857–867.Google Scholar

Yamasaki, Y. and Mori, Y., Seasonal activity pattern of a nocturnal fossorial snake, Achalinus spinalis (Serpentes: Xenodermidae). Current Herpetology, 36 (2017), 28–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shine, R., Harlow, P., Keogh, J. S., and Boeadi, Biology and commercial utilization of acrochordid snakes, with special reference to Karung (Acrochordus javanicus). Journal of Herpetology, 29 (1995), 352–360.Google Scholar

Cundall, D. and Irish, F., The snake skull. In Gans, C., Gaunt, A. S., and Adler, K., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Volume 20, Morphology H (Ithaca: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 2008). pp. 349–692.Google Scholar

Peng, L., Yang, D., Duan, S., and Huang, S., Mitochondrial genome of the Common burrowing snake Achalinus spinalis (Reptilia: Xenodermatidae). Mitochondrial DNA, Part B Resources, 2 (2017), 571–572.Google Scholar

Guo, P. and Zhao, E.- M., Comparison of skull morphology in nine Asian pit vipers (Serpentes: Crotalinae). Herpetological Journal, 16 (2006), 305–313.Google Scholar

You, C. W., Poyarkov, N. A., and Lin, S. M., Diversity of the snail-eating snakes Pareas (Serpentes, Pareatidae) from Taiwan. Zoologica Scripta, 44 (2015), 349–361.Google Scholar

Plummer, M., Observations on hibernacula and overwintering ecology of Eastern hog-nosed snakes (Heterodon platirhinos). Herpetological Review, 33 (2002), 89–90.Google Scholar

Michener, M. C. and Lazell, J. D., Distribution and relative abundance of the hognose snake, Heterodon platirhinos, in eastern New England. Journal of Herpetology, 23 (1989), 35–40.Google Scholar

Socha, J. J., Gliding flight in Chrysopelea: turning a snake into a wing. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 51 (2011), 969–982.Google Scholar

Bell, J. L. and Polcyn, M. J., Dallasaurus turneri, a new primitive mosasauroid from the Middle Turonian of Texas and comments on the phylogeny of Mosasauridae (Squamata). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 84 (2005), 177–194.Google Scholar

Yi, H., Sampath, D., Schoenfeld, S., and Norell, M. A., Reconstruction of inner-ear shape and size in mosasaurs (Reptilia: Squamata) reveals complex aquatic adaptation strategies in secondary aquatic reptiles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 32 Supplement (2012), 198A.Google Scholar

Adams, D. C. and Otárola-Castillo, E., Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2013), 393–399.Google Scholar

Bookstein, F. L., Morphometric Tool for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Richtsmeier, J. T., Paik, C. H., Elfert, P. C., Cole, T. M., and Dahlman, H. R., Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 32 (1995), 217–227.Google Scholar

Gunz, P., Ramsier, M., Kuhrig, M., Hublin, J.- J., and Spoor, F., The mammalian bony labyrinth reconsidered, introducing a comprehensive geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Anatomy, 220 (2012), 529–543.Google Scholar

Ni, X., Flynn, J. J., and Wyss, A. R., Imaging the inner ear in fossil mammals: high-resolution CT scanning and 3-D virtual reconstructions. Palaeontologica Electronica, 15 (2012), 1–10.Google Scholar

Boistel, R., Herrel, A., Lebrun, R., et al., Shake rattle and roll: the bony labyrinth and aerial descent in squamates. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 51 (2011), 957–968.Google Scholar

Georgi, J. A., Sipla, J. S., and Forster, C. A., Turning semicircular canal function on its head: dinosaurs and a novel vestibular analysis. PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), 1–11.Google Scholar

Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., and Bookstein, F. L., Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In Slice, D. E., ed., Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (Boston: Springer, 2005), pp. 73–98.Google Scholar

Zheng, Y. and Wiens, J. J., Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 94 (2016), 537–547.Google Scholar

Spoor, F., Bajpai, S., Hussain, S. T., and Kumar, K., Thewissen, J. G. M., Vestibular evidence for the evolution of aquatic behaviour in early cetaceans. Nature, 417 (2002), 163–165.Google Scholar

Ekdale, E. G., Comparative anatomy of the bony labyrinth (inner ear) of placental mammals. PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), e66624.Google Scholar

Woodward, A. S., On some extinct reptiles from Patagonia, of the genera Miolania, Dinilysia, and Genyodectes . Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 70 (1901), 169–184.Google Scholar

Estes, R., Frazzetta, T. H., and Williams, E. E., Studies on the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. I. Cranial morphology. Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University, 119 (1970), 25–74.Google Scholar

Frazzetta, T. H., Studies on the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. Part 2. Jaw machinery in the earliest snakes. Forma et Functio, 3 (1970), 205–221.Google Scholar

Zaher, H. and Scanferla, A., The skull of the Upper Cretaceous snake Dinilysia patagonica Smith-Woodward, 1901, and its phylogenetic position revisited. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 164 (2012), 194–238.Google Scholar

Simões, T. R., Caldwell, M. W., Tałanda, M., et al., The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps. Nature, 557 (2018), 706–709.Google Scholar

Zaher, H., Apesteguía, S., and Scanferla, A., The anatomy of the Upper Cretaceous snake Najash rionegrina Apesteguía & Zaher, 2006, and the evolution of limblessness in snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156 (2009), 801–826.Google Scholar

Caldwell, M. W. and Albino, A. M., Palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology of three Cretaceous snakes: Pachyophis, Pachyrhachis, and Dinilysia . Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 46 (2001), 203–218.Google Scholar

Hecht, M. K., The vertebral morphology of the Cretaceous snake, Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. Neues Jarhbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte, 1982 (1982), 523–532.Google Scholar

Caldwell, M. W. and Albino, A., Exceptionally preserved skeletons of the Cretaceous snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward, 1901. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22 (2002), 861–866.Google Scholar

Scanlon, J. D., A new large madtsoiid snake from the Miocene of the Northern Territory. The Beagle: Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territories, 9 (1992), 49–60.Google Scholar

Scanlon, J. D. and Lee, M. S. Y., The Pleistocene serpent Wonambi and the early evolution of snakes. Nature 403 (2000), 416–420.Google Scholar

Schwenk, K., The evolution of chemoreception in squamate reptiles: a phylogenetic approach. Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, 41 (1993), 124–137.Google Scholar

Goris, R. C., Infrared organs of snakes: an integral part of vision. Journal of Herpetology, 45 (2011), 2–14.Google Scholar

Crowe-Riddell, J. M., Williams, R., Chapuis, L., and Sanders, K. L., Ultrastructural evidence of a mechanosensory function of scale organs (sensilla) in sea snakes (Hydrophiinae). Royal Society Open Science, 6 (2019), 182022.Google Scholar

Starck, D., Cranio-cerebral relations in recent reptiles. In Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G. and Ulinski, P., eds., Biology of the Reptilia Vol. 9, Neurology A (London: Academic Press, 1979), pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Senn, D. G., Über das optische System im Gehirn squamater Reptilien. Eine vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchung, unter besonderer Berucksichtigung einiger Wuhlschlangen. Acta Anatomica, 65 (1966), 1–87.Google Scholar

Masai, H., Takatsuji, K., and Sato, Y., Comparative morphology of the telencephalon of the Japanese colubrid snakes under consideration of habit. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 18 (1980), 310–314.Google Scholar

Platel, R., Nouvelles données sur l’encéphalisation des Reptiles Squamates. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 13 (1975), 161–184.Google Scholar

Olori, J. C., Digital endocasts of the cranial cavity and osseous labyrinth of the burrowing snake Uropeltis woodmasoni (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae). Copeia, 2010 (2010), 14–26.Google Scholar

Allemand, R., Boistel, R., Daghfous, G., et al., Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals. Journal of Anatomy, 231 (2017), 849–868.Google Scholar

Triviño, L. N., Albino, A., Dozo, M. T., and Williams, J. D., First natural endocranial cast of a fossil snake (Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina). The Anatomical Record, 301 (2018), 9–20.Google Scholar

Hopson, J. A., Paleoneurology. In Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G., and Ulinski, P., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 9, Neurology A (New York: Academic Press, 1979), pp. 39–146.Google Scholar

Donkelaar, H. J., Reptiles. In Nieuwenhuys, R., ten Donkelaar, H. J. and Nicholson, C., eds., The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates (Berlin: Springer, 1998), pp. 1313–1524.Google Scholar

Halpern, M., The telencephalon of snakes. In Ebbesson, S. O. E., ed., Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon (New York: Plenum Press, 1980), pp. 257–294.Google Scholar

Rudin, W., Untersuchungen am olfaktorischen System der Reptilien. III. Differenzierungsformen einiger olfaktorischer Zentren bei Reptilien. Acta Anatomica, 89 (1974), 481–515.Google Scholar

Saint Girons, H., The pituitary gland. In Gans, C. and Parsons, T. S., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 3, Morphology C (London: Academic Press, 1970), pp. 135–199.Google Scholar

Schreibman, M. P., The pituitary gland. In Pang, P. K. T. and Schreibman, M. P., eds., Vertebrate Endocrinology: Fundamentals and Biomedical Implications, Vol. 1 (New York: Academic Press, 1986), pp. 11–55.Google Scholar

Senn, D. G., The saurian and ophidian colliculi posteriores of the midbrain. Acta Anatomica, 74 (1969), 114–120.Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuys, R., Comparative anatomy of the cerebellum. Progress in Brain Research, 25 (1967), 1–93.Google Scholar

Estes, R., Frazzetta, T. H., and Williams, E. E., Studies on the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. I. Cranial morphology. Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University, 119 (1970), 25–74.Google Scholar

Zaher, H. and Scanferla, A., The skull of the Upper Cretaceous snake Dinilysia patagonica Smith-Woodward, 1901, and its phylogenetic position revisited. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 164 (2012), 194–238.Google Scholar

Iwaniuk, A. N., Hurd, P. L., and Wylie, D. R., Comparative morphology of the avian cerebellum: II. Size of folia. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 69 (2007), 196–219.Google Scholar

Macrì, S., Savriama, Y., Khan, I., and Di-Poï, N., Comparative analysis of squamate brains unveils multi-level variation in cerebellar architecture associated with locomotor specialization. Nature Communications, 10 (2019), 5560.Google Scholar

Hanken, J. and Wake, D. B., Miniaturization of body size: organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 24 (1993), 501–519.Google Scholar

Maddin, H. C., Olori, J. C., and Anderson, J. S., A redescription of Carrolla craddocki (Lepospondyli: Brachystelechidae) based on high-resolution CT, and the impacts of miniaturization and fossoriality on morphology. Journal of Morphology, 272 (2011), 722–743.Google Scholar

Lieberman, D. E., Hallgrímsson, B., Liu, W., Parsons, T. E., and Jamniczky, H. A., Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: testing a new model using mice. Journal of Anatomy, 212 (2008), 720–735.Google Scholar

Senn, D. G. and Northcutt, R. N., The forebrain and midbrain of some squamates and their bearing on the origin of snakes. Journal of Morphology, 140 (1973), 153–152.Google Scholar

Reperant, O. J., Miceli, D., Rio, J.-P., and Weidner, C., The primary optic system in a microphthalmic snake (Calabaria reinhardtii). Brain Research, 408, 233–238.Google Scholar

Reperant, O. J., Rio, J.-P., Ward, R., et al., Comparative analysis of the primary visual system of reptiles. In Gans, C. and Ulinski, P. S., eds., Sensory Integration. Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 17, Neurology C (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992) pp. 175–240.Google Scholar

Platel, R., Analyse volumétrique comparée des principales subdivisions télencephaliques chez les reptiles saurines. Journal für Hirnforschung, 21 (1980), 271–291.Google Scholar

Northcutt, R. G., Forebrain and midbrain organization in lizards and its phylogenetic significance. In Greenberg, N. and Maclean, P. D., eds., Behavior and Neurology of Lizards (Rockeville: NIMH, 1978), pp. 11–64.Google Scholar

Gharzi, A., Abbasi, M., and Yusefi, P., Histological studies on the vomeronasal organ of the worm-like snake, Typhlops vermicularis. Journal of Biological Sciences, 13 (2013), 372–378.Google Scholar

Webb, J. K. and Shine, R., To find an ant: trail-following in Australian blindsnakes (Typhlopidae). Animal Behaviour, 43 (1992), 941–948.Google Scholar

Masai, H., Structural patterns of the optic tectum in Japanese snakes of the family Colubridae in relation to habit. Journal für Hirnforschung, 14 (1973), 367–374.Google Scholar

Catania, K. C., The brain and behavior of the tentacled snake. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 1225 (2011), 83–89.Google Scholar

Butler, A. B. and Hodos, W., Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation (Hoboken: John Wiley, 2005).Google Scholar

Christensen, C. B., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Brandt, C., and Madsen, P. T., Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python, Python regius. Journal of Experimental Biology, 215 (2012), 331–342.Google Scholar

Larsell, O.. The cerebellum of reptiles: lizards and snake. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 41 (1926) 59–94.Google Scholar

Caldwell, M. W., The Origin Of Snakes: Morphology and the Fossil Record (Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2019).Google Scholar

Palci, A., Hutchinson, M. N., Caldwell, M. W., and Lee, M. S. Y., The morphology of the inner ear of squamate reptiles and its bearing on the origin of snakes. Royal Society Open Science, 4 (2017), 170685.Google Scholar

Garberoglio, F. F., Apesteguia, S., Simoes, T., et al., New skulls and skeletons of the Cretaceous legged snake Najash, and the evolution of the modern snake body plan. Science Advances, 5 (2019), eaax5833.Google Scholar

Garberoglio, F. F., Gómez, R. O., Apesteguia, S., et al., A new specimen with skull and vertebrae of Najash rionegrina (Lepidosauria: Ophidia) from the early Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 17 (2019), 1533–1550.Google Scholar

Yi, H. and Norell, M. A., The burrowing origin of modern snakes. Science Advances, 1 (2015), e1500743.Google Scholar

Scanferla, A. and Bhullar, B. A. S., Postnatal development of the skull of Dinilysia patagonica (Squamata-Stem Serpentes). The Anatomical Record, 297 (2014), 560–573.Google Scholar

Scanferla, A., Postnatal ontogeny and the evolution of macrostomy in snakes. Royal Society Open Science, 3 (2016), 160612.Google Scholar

Caldwell, M. W. and Albino, A. M., Palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology of three Cretaceous snakes: Pachyophis, Pachyrhachis, and Dinilysia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 46 (2001), 203–218.Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., Ophthalmological implications for the early history of the snakes. Copeia 1940 (1940), 1–8.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., The eye. In Gans, C. and Parsons, T.S., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 2, Morphology B (New York: Academic Press, 1970), pp. 1–97.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Jared, C., et al., Visual system evolution and the nature of the ancestral snake. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28 (2015), 1309–1320.Google Scholar

Miralles, A., Marin, L., Markus, D., et al., Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (2018), 1782–1793.Google Scholar

Hsiang, A. Y., Field, D. J., Webster, T. H., et al., The origin of snakes: revealing the ecology, behavior, and evolutionary history of early snakes using genomics, phenomics, and the fossil record. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15 (2015), 87.Google Scholar

Da Silva, F. O., Fabre, A.-C., Savriama, Y., et al., The ecological origins of snakes as revealed by skull evolution. Nature Communications, 9 (2018), 376.Google Scholar

Zaher, H., Murphy, R. W., Arredondo, J. C., et al., Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLoS ONE, 14 (2019), e0216148.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., A Contribution to the Classification of Snakes (London: British Museum (Natural History), 1967).Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation (Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science, 1942).Google Scholar

Bellairs, A. D’A. and Underwood, G., The origin of Snakes. Biological Reviews, 26 (1951), 193–237.Google Scholar

Caprette, C. L., Lee, M. S. Y., Shine, R., Mokany, A., and Downhower, J. F., The origin of snakes (Serpentes) as seen through eye anatomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81 (2004), 469–482.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Jared, C., et al., Visual system evolution and the nature of the ancestral snake. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28 (2015), 1309–1320.Google Scholar

Schott, R. K., Van Nynatten, A., Card, D. C., Castoe, T. A., and Change, B. S. W., Shifts in selective pressures on snake phototransduction genes associated with photoreceptor transmutation and dim-light ancestry. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35 (2018), 1376–1389.Google Scholar

Miralles, A., Marin, J., Markus, D., et al., Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (2018), 1782–1793.Google Scholar

Zaher, H., Grazziotin, F. G., Cadle, J. E., et al., Molecular phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia) with an emphasis on South American xenodontines: a revised classification and descriptions of new taxa. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 49 (2009), 115–153.Google Scholar

Hauzman, E., Kalava, V., Bonci, D. M. O., and Ventura, D. F., Characterization of the melanopsin gene (Opn4x) of diurnal and nocturnal snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19 (2019), 174.Google Scholar

Aranda, M. L. and Schmidt, T. M., Diversity of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: circuits and functions. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 78 (2021), 889–907.Google Scholar

Díaz, N. M., Morera, L. P., and Guido, M. E., Melanopsin and the non-visual photochemistry in the inner retina of vertebrates. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 92 (2016), 29–44.Google Scholar

Schott, R. K., Müller, J., Yang, C. G. Y., et al., Evolutionary transformation of rod photoreceptors in the all-cone retina of a diurnal garter snake. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113 (2016), 356–361.Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, N., Darren, B., Schott, R. K., Tropepe, V., and Chang, B. S. W., Cone-like rhodopsin expressed in the all-cone retina of the colubrid pine snake as a potential adaptation to diurnality. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220 (2017), 2418–2425.Google Scholar

Hauzman, E., Bonci, D. M. O., Suárez-Villota, E. Y., Neitz, M., and Ventura, D. F., Daily activity patterns influence retinal morphology, signatures of selection, and spectral tuning of opsin genes in colubrid snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17 (2017), 249–263.Google Scholar

Lamb, T. D., Evolution of phototransduction, vertebrate photoreceptors and retina. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 36 (2013), 52–119.Google Scholar

Palczewski, K. and Kiser, P. D., Shedding new light on the generation of the visual chromophore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117 (2020), 19629–19638.Google Scholar

Choi, E. H., Daruwalla, A., Suh, S., Leinonen, H., and Palczewski, K., Retinoids in the visual cycle: role of the retinal G protein-coupled receptor. Journal of Lipid Research, 62 (2020), 100040.Google Scholar

Morshedian, A., Kaylor, J. J., Ng, S. Y, et al., Light-driven regeneration of cone visual pigments through a mechanism involving RGR opsin in Müller glial cells. Neuron , 102 (2019), 1172–1183.Google Scholar

Davies, W. I. L., Collin, S. P., and Hunt, D. M., Molecular ecology and adaptation of visual photopigments in craniates. Molecular Ecology, 21 (2012), 3121–3158.Google Scholar

Gemmell, N. J., Rutherford, K., Prost, S., et al., The tuatara genome reveals ancient features of amniote evolution. Nature, 584 (2020), 403–409.Google Scholar

Gower, D. J., Fleming, J. F., Pisani, D., et al, Eye-transcriptome and genome-wide sequencing for Scolecophidia: implications for inferring the visual system of the ancestral snake. Genome Biology and Evolution, 13(2021), evab253.Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., The reptilian retina: I. A new concept of visual-cell evolution. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 17 (1934), 892–915.Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., Ophthalmological implications for the early history of the Snakes. Copeia, 1 (1940), 1–8.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., Some suggestions concerning vertebrate visual cells. Vision Research, 8 (1968), 483–488.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., The eye. In Gans, C., Parson, T. S., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Morphology B. (New York: Academic Press, 1970), pp. 1–97.Google Scholar

Rochon-Duvigneaud, A., Les yeux et la vision des vertébrés (Paris: Masson, 1943).Google Scholar

Mahendra, B. C., Some remarks on the phylogeny of the Ophidia. Anatomischer Anzeiger, 86 (1938), 347–356.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., On lizards of the family Pygopodidae. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Squamata. Journal of Morphology, 100 (1957), 207–268.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, M., Mauro, D. S., Sherratt, E., and Gower, D. J., A nine-family classification of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Zootaxa, 64 (2011), 41–64.Google Scholar

San Mauro, D., Gower, D. J., Müller, H., et al., Life-history evolution and mitogenomic phylogeny of caecilian amphibians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 73 (2014), 177–189.Google Scholar

Senn, D. G., Uber das optische System im Gehirn squamater Reptilien; eine vergleichendmorphologische Untersuchung, unter besonderer Berucksichtigung einiger Wuhlschlangen. Acta Anatomica, 65 (1966), 1–87.Google Scholar

Stingelin, W. and Senn, D. G., Morphological studies on the brain of Sauropsida. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 167 (1969), 156–163.Google Scholar

Senn, D. G. and Northcutt, R. G., The forebrain and midbrain of some squamates and their bearing on the origin of snakes. Journal of Morphology, 140 (1973), 135–151.Google Scholar

Repérant, J., Rio, J. P., Ward, R., et al., Comparative analysis of the primary visual system of reptiles. In Gans, C. and Ulinski, S., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 17 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), pp. 175–240 Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., The significance of the reptilian ‘spectacle’. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 17 (1934), 1045–1047.Google Scholar

Douglas, R. H. and Jeffery, G., The spectral transmission of ocular media suggests ultraviolet sensitivity is widespread among mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281 (2014), 20132995.Google Scholar

Hart, N. S., Coimbra, J. P., Collin, S. P., and Westhoff, G., Photoreceptor types, visual pigments, and topographic specializations in the retinas of hydrophiid sea snakes. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 520 (2012), 1246–1261.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Douglas, R. H., et al., Visual pigments, ocular filters and the evolution of snake vision. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33 (2016), 2483–2495.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Gower, D. J., Rasmussen, A. R., et al., Spectral diversification and trans-species allelic polymorphism during the land-to-sea transition in snakes. Current Biology, 30 (2020), 2608–2615.Google Scholar

Douglas, R. H. and Marshall, N. J., A review of vertebrate and invertebrate ocular filters. In Archer, S. N., Djamgoz, M. B. A., Loew, E. R., Partridge, J. C., and Vallerga, S., eds., Adaptive Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision (The Netherlands: Springer, 1999), pp. 95–162.Google Scholar

Van Doorn, K. and Sivak, J. G., Blood flow dynamics in the snake spectacle. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216 (2013), 4190–4195.Google Scholar

Van Doorn, K. and Sivak, J. G., Spectral transmittance of the spectacle scale of snakes and geckos. Contributions to Zoology, 84 (2015), 1–12.Google Scholar

Da Silva, M. A. O., Heegaard, S., Wang, T., Nyengard, J. R., and Bertelsen, M. F., The spectacle of the ball python (Python regius): a morphological description. Journal of Morphology, 275 (2014), 489–496.Google Scholar

Lauridsen, H., Da Silva, M. A. O., Hansen, K., et al., Ultrasound imaging of the anterior section of the eye of five different snake species. BMC Veterinary Research, 10 (2014), 1–6.Google Scholar

Da Silva, M. A. O., Heegaard, S., Wang, T., et al., Morphology of the snake spectacle reflects its evolutionary adaptation and development. BMC Veterinary Research, 13 (2017), 1–8.Google Scholar

Da Silva, M. A. O., Gade, J. T., Damsgaard, C., et al., Morphology and evolution of the snake cornea. Journal of Morphology, 281 (2020), 240–249.Google Scholar

Sivak, J. G., The role of the spectacle in the visual optics of the snake eye. Vision Research, 17 (1977), 293–298.Google Scholar

Caprette, C. L., Conquering the cold shudder: the origin and evolution of snakes eyes . Unpublished PhD thesis, Ohio State University (2005).Google Scholar

Perry, B. W., Card, D. C., McGlothin, J. W., et al., Molecular adaptations for sensing and securing prey and insight into amniote genome diversity from the garter snake genome. Genome Biology and Evolution, 10 (2018), 2110–2129.Google Scholar

Wistow, G. J., Molecular Biology and Evolution of Crystallins: Gene Recruitment and Multifunctional Proteins in the Eye Lens (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar

Röll, B., Multiple origin of diurnality in geckos: evidence from eye lens crystallins. Naturwissenschaften, 88 (2001), 293–296.Google Scholar

Ott, M., Visual accommodation in vertebrates: mechanisms, physiological response and stimuli. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 192 (2006), 97–111.Google Scholar

Fontenot, C. L., Variation in pupil diameter in North American Gartersnakes (Thamnophis) is regulated by immersion in water, not by light intensity. Vision Research, 48 (2008), 1663–1669.Google Scholar

Munro, D. F., Vertical position of the pupil in the Crotalidae. Herpetologica, 5 (1949), 106–108.Google Scholar

Werner, Y. L., Extreme adaptability to light, in the round pupil of the snake Spalerosophis . Vision Research, 10 (1970), 1159–1160.Google Scholar

Douglas, R. H., The pupillary light responses of animals: a review of their distribution, dynamics, mechanisms and functions. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 66 (2018), 17–48.Google Scholar

Brischoux, F., Pizzatto, L., and Shine, R., Insights into the adaptive significance of vertical pupil shape in snakes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23 (2010), 1878–1885.Google Scholar

Pyron, R. A. and Wallach, V., Systematics of the blindsnakes (Serpentes: Scolecophidia: Typhlopoidea) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Zootaxa, 3829 (2014), 1–81.Google Scholar

Gower, D. J., Captain, A., and Thakur, S. S., On the taxonomic status of Uropeltis bicatenata (Günther) (Reptilia: Serpentes: Uropeltidae). Hamadryad, 33 (2008), 64–82.Google Scholar

Giri, V. B., Gower, D. J., Das, A., et al., A new genus and species of natricine snake from northeast India. Zootaxa, 4603 (2019), 241–264.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., On the visual-cell pattern of a homalopsine snake. Journal of Anatomy, 100 (1966), 571–575.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., A comprehensive approach to the classification of higher snakes. Herpetologica, 23 (1967), 161–168.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J. B., The retina of Psammodynastes pulverulentus (Boie, 1827) and Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831) with a discussion of their phylogenetic significance (Colubroidea, Serpentes). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 28 (1990), 269–276.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J. B., An intergeneric analysis of some boogie snakes – Bogert’s (1940) Group XIII and XIV (Boifinae, Serpentes). Vidensk Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Foren, 141 (1979), 97–155.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J. B., A re-evaluation of the systematics of the African rear-fanged snakes of Bogert’s Groups XII–XVI, including a discussion of some evolutionary trends within Caenophidia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on African Vertebrates Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig (Bonn, 1985), pp. 531–548.Google Scholar

Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Loew, E. R., et al., Multiple rod–cone and cone–rod photoreceptor transmutations in snakes: evidence from visual opsin gene expression. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283 (2016), 20152624.Google Scholar

Schott, R. K., Bhattacharyya, N., and Chang, B. S. W., Evolutionary signatures of photoreceptor transmutation in geckos reveal potential adaptation and convergence with snakes. Evolution, 73 (2019), 1958–1971.Google Scholar

Sillman, A. J., Carver, J. K., and Loew, E. R., The photoreceptors and visual pigments in the retina of a boid snake, the ball python (Python regius). Journal of Experimental Biology, 202 (1999), 1931–1938.Google Scholar

Sillman, A. J., Johnson, J. L., and Loew, E. R., Retinal photoreceptors and visual pigments in Boa constrictor imperator . Journal of Experimental Zoology, 290 (2001), 359–365.Google Scholar

Gower, D. J., Sampaio, F. L., Peichl, L., et al., Evolution of the eyes of vipers with and without infrared-sensing pit organs. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 126 (2019), 796–823.Google Scholar

Munk, O. and Rasmussen, J. B.. Note on the rod-like photoreceptors in the retina of the snake Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831). Acta Zoologica, 74 (1993), 9–13.Google Scholar

Miller, W. H. and Snyder, A. W., The tiered vertebrate retina. Vision Research, 17 (1977), 239–255.Google Scholar

Sillman, A. J., Govardovskii, V. I., Rohlich, P., Southard, J. A., and Loew, E. R., The photoreceptors and visual pigments of the garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis): a microspectrophotometric, scanning electron microscopic and immunocytochemical study. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 181 (1997), 89–101.Google Scholar

Hauzman, E., Bonci, D. M. O., Grotzner, S. R., et al., Comparative study of photoreceptor and retinal ganglion cell topography and spatial resolving power in dipsadidae snakes. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 84 (2014), 197–213.Google Scholar

Ullmann, J. F. P., Moore, B. A., Temple, S. E., Fernández-Juricic, E., and Collin, S. P., The retinal wholemount technique: a window to understanding the brain and behaviour. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 79 (2012), 26–44.Google Scholar

Stone, J., The Whole Mount Handbook. A Guide to the Preparation and Analysis of Retinal Wholemounts (Sydney: Maitland Publications, 1981).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Parallel Processing in the Visual System (New York: Plenum, 1983).Google Scholar

Hughes, A., The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organisation. In Crescitelli, F., Dvorak, C. A., Eder, D. J., et al., eds., The Visual System in Vertebrates. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. 7 (Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer, 1977), pp. 613–756.Google Scholar

Schmitz, L., Evolution of retinal topography in coral reef fishes. Journal of Morphology, 280 (2019), S69.Google Scholar

Wong, R. O., Morphology and distribution of neurons in the retina of the American garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis . Journal of Comparative Neurology, 283 (1989), 587–601.Google Scholar

Hauzman, E., Bonci, D. M. O., and Ventura, D. F., Retinal topographic maps: a glimpse into the animals’ visual world. In Heinbockel, T., ed., Sensory Nervous System (London: IntechOpen, 2018), pp. 101–126.Google Scholar

Kalberer, M. and Pedler, C., The visual cells of the alligator: an electron microscopic study. Vision Research, 3 (1963), 323–329.Google Scholar

Pedler, C. and Tilly, R., The nature of the gecko visual cell. Vision Research, 4 (1964), 499–510.Google Scholar

Underwood, G., An overview of venomous snake evolution. In Thorpe, R. S., Wüster, W. and Malhotra, A., eds., Venomous Snake. Ecology, Evolution and Snakebite, The Zoological Society of London (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Govardovskii, V. I. and Chkheidze, N. I, Retinal photoreceptors and visual pigments in certain snakes. Biological Abstracts, 90 (1989), 1036.Google Scholar

Davies, W. L., Cowing, J. A., Bowmaker, J. K., et al., Shedding light on serpent sight: the visual pigments of henophidian snakes. Journal of Neuroscience, 29 (2009), 7519–7525.Google Scholar

Seiko, T., Kishida, T., Toyama, M., et al., Visual adaptation of opsin genes to the aquatic environment in sea snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 20 (2020), 1–13.Google Scholar

Hauzman, E., Pierotti, M. E., Bhattacharyya, N., et al., Simultaneous expression of UV and violet SWS1 opsins expands the visual palette in a group of freshwater snakes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38 (2021), 5225–5240.Google Scholar

Van Nynatten, A., Castiglione, G. M., Gutierrez, E. A., Lovejoy, N. R., and Chang, B. S. W., Recreated ancestral opsin associated with marine to freshwater croaker invasion reveals kinetic and spectral adaptation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38 (2021), 2076–2087.Google Scholar

Yokoyama, S., Evolution of dim-light and color vision pigments. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 9 (2008), 259–282.Google Scholar

Yokoyama, S., Starmer, W. T., Takahashi, Y., and Tada, T., Tertiary structure and spectral tuning of UV and violet pigments in vertebrates. Gene, 365 (2006), 95–103.Google Scholar

Hunt, D. M. and Peichl, L., S cones: evolution, retinal distribution, development, and spectral sensitivity. Vision Neuroscience, 31 (2014), 115–138.Google Scholar

Yokoyama, S., Yang, H., and Starmer, W. T., Molecular basis of spectral tuning in the red- and green-sensitive (M/LWS) pigments in vertebrates. Genetics, 179 (2008), 2037–2043.Google Scholar

Hunt, D. M. and Collin, S. P., The evolution of photoreceptors and visual photopigments in vertebrates. In Hunt, D. M., Hankins, M. W., Collin, S. P., and Marshall, J. N., eds., Evolution of Visual and Non-visual Pigments (Boston: Springer, 2014), pp. 163–217.Google Scholar

Hauser, F. E., Van Hazel, I. and Chang, B. S. W., Spectral tuning in vertebrate short wavelength-sensitive 1 (SWS1) visual pigments: can wavelength sensitivity be inferred from sequence data? Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 322 (2014), 529–539.Google Scholar

Martin, M., Le Galliard, J. F., Meylan, S., and Loew, E. R., The importance of ultraviolet and near-infrared sensitivity for visual discrimination in two species of lacertid lizards. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218 (2015), 458–465.Google Scholar

Veilleux, C. C. and Cummings, M. E., Nocturnal light environments and species ecology: implications for nocturnal color vision in forests. Journal of Experimental Biology, 215 (2012), 4085–4096.Google Scholar

Hargrave, P. A., McDowell, J. H., Curtis, D. R., et al., The structure of bovine rhodopsin. Biophysics of Structure and Mechanism, 9 (1983), 235–244.Google Scholar

Nathans, J. and Hogness, D. S.. Isolation, sequence analysis, and intron-exon arrangement of the gene encoding bovine rhodopsin. Cell, 34 (1983), 807–814.Google Scholar

Ovchinnikov, Y. A., Rhodopsin and bacteriorhodopsin: structure-function relationships. FEBS Letters, 148 (1982), 179–191.Google Scholar

Schott, R. K., Panesar, B., Card, D. C., et al., Targeted capture of complete coding regions across divergent species. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9 (2017), 398–414.Google Scholar

Katti, C., Stacey-Solis, M., Coronel-Rojas, N. A., and Davies, W. I. L., Opsin-based photopigments expressed in the retina of a South American pit viper, Bothrops atrox (Viperidae). Visual Neuroscience, 35 (2018), e027.Google Scholar

Vonk, F. J., Casewell, N. R., Henkel, C. V., et al., The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110 (2013), 20651–20656.Google Scholar

Castoe, T. A., de Koning, A. P. J., Hall, K. T., et al., The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110 (2013), 20645–20650.Google Scholar

Yin, W., Wang, Z., Li, Q-.Y., et al., Evolutionary trajectories of snake genes and genomes revealed by comparative analyses of five-pacer viper. Nature Communications, 7 (2016), 1–11.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A., Archelosaurian color vision, parietal eye loss, and the crocodylian nocturnal bottleneck. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34 (2016), 666–676.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A. and Springer, M. S., Genomic evidence for rod monochromacy in sloths and armadillos suggests early subterranean history for xenarthra. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282 (2014), 20142192.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A. and Springer, M. S., Eyes underground: regression of visual protein networks in subterranean mammals. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 78 (2014), 260–270.Google Scholar

Springer, M. S., Emerling, C. A., Fugate, N., et al., Inactivation of cone-specific phototransduction genes in rod monochromatic cetaceans. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2016), 61.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A., Genomic regression of claw keratin, taste receptor and light-associated genes provides insights into biology and evolutionary origins of snakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 115 (2017), 40–49.Google Scholar

Anisimova, M. and Kosiol, C., Investigating protein-coding sequence evolution with probabilistic codon substitution models. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26 (2009), 255–271.Google Scholar

Yang, Z., PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24 (2007), 1586–1591.Google Scholar

Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., Frost, S. D. W., and Muse, S. V., HyPhy: Hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 21 (2005), 676–679.Google Scholar

Wertheim, J. O., Murrell, B., Smith, M. D., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., and Scheffler, K., RELAX: Detecting relaxed selection in a phylogenetic framework. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32 (2015), 820–832.Google Scholar

Bielawski, J. P. and Yang, Z., A maximum likelihood method for detecting functional divergence at individual codon sites, with application to gene family evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 59 (2004), 121–132.Google Scholar

Schott, R. K., Refvik, S. P., Hauser, F. E., López-Fernández, H., and Chang, B. S. W., Divergent positive selection in rhodopsin from lake and riverine cichlid fishes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31 (2014), 1149–1165.Google Scholar

Baker, J. L., Dunn, K. A., Mingrone, J., et al., Functional divergence of the nuclear receptor NR2C1 as a modulator of pluripotentiality during hominid evolution. Genetics, 203 (2016), 905–922.Google Scholar

Jacobs, G. H., Fenwick, J. A., Crognale, M. A., and Deegan, J. F., The all-cone retina of the garter snake: spectral mechanisms and photopigment. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 170 (1992), 701–707.Google Scholar

Elliott, W. R., Glickman, R. D., Rentmeister-Bryant, H., and Zwick, H., Functional assessment of snake retina using pattern ERG. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44 (2003), 2706–2706.Google Scholar

Glickman, R. D., Elliott, W. R. III, and Kumar, N., Functional and cellular responses to laser injury in the rat snake retina. In Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVIII, 643511, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2007).Google Scholar

Baker, R. A., Gawne, T. J., Loop, M. S., and Pullman, S., Visual acuity of the midland banded water snake estimated from evoked telencephalic potentials. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 193 (2007), 865–870.Google Scholar

Lythgoe, J. N., Ecology of Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Rumpff, H., Experimental studies on vision in Indian snakes. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 76 (1979), 475–480.Google Scholar

Szabo, B., Noble, D. W. A., and Whiting, M. J., Learning in non-avian reptiles 40 years on: advances and promising new directions. Biological Reviews, 96 (2021), 331–356.Google Scholar

Terrick, T. D., Mumme, R. L., and Burghardt, G. M., Aposematic coloration enhances chemosensory recognition of noxious prey in the garter snake Thamnophis radix . Animal Behaviour, 49 (1995), 857–866.Google Scholar

Friesen, R., Spatial learning of shelter locations and associative learning of a foraging task in the Cottonmouth, (Agkistrodon piscivorus). Unpublished MSc thesis, Missouri State University (2017).Google Scholar

Aubret, F., Bonnet, X., Pearson, D., and Shine, R., How can blind tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) forage successfully? Australian Journal of Zoology, 53 (2005), 283–288.Google Scholar

Grace, M. S. and Matsushita, A., Neural correlates of complex behavior: vision and infrared imaging in boas and pythons. In Henderson, R. and Powell, R., eds., Biology of the Boas, Pythons and Related Taxa (Eagle Mountain: Eagle Mountain Publishing), pp. 271–285.Google Scholar

Lee, M. S. Y., Hugall, A. F., Lawson, R., and Scanlon, J. D., Phylogeny of snakes (Serpentes): combining morphological and molecular data in likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony analyses. Systematics and Biodiversity, 5 (2007), 371–389.Google Scholar

Wilcox, T. P., Zwickl, D. J., Heath, T. A., and Hillis, D. M., Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 25 (2002), 361–371.Google Scholar

Rieppel, O., ‘Regressed’ Macrostomatan Snakes. Fieldiana Life and Earth Sciences, 2012 (2012), 99–103.Google Scholar

Walls, G. L., Visual purple in snakes. Science, 75 (1932), 467–468.Google Scholar

Koch, N. M., Garwood, R. J., and Parry, L. A., Fossils improve phylogenetic analyses of morphological characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288 (2021), 20210044.Google Scholar

Cundall, D. and Irish, F., The snake skull. In Gans, C., Gaunt, A. S. and Adler, K., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 20, Morphology H (Ithaca, NY: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 2008), pp. 349–692.Google Scholar

Wiens, J. J., Hutter, C. R., Mulcahy, D. G., et al., Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biology Letters, 8 (2012), 1043–1046.Google Scholar

Atkins, J. B. and Franz-Odendaal, T. A., The sclerotic ring of squamates: an evo-devo-eco perspective. Journal of Anatomy, 229 (2016), 503–513.Google Scholar

Franz, V., Vergleichende anatomie des wirbeltierauges. In Bolk, L., Goppert, E., Kallius, E. and Lubosch, W., eds., Handbuch der vergleichenden anatomie der wirbeltiere (Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin, 1934), pp. 989–1292.Google Scholar

Bellairs, A d’A. and Boyd, J. D., The lachrymal apparatus in lizards and snakes.-II. The anterior part of the lachrymal duct and its relationship with the palate and with the nasal and vomeronasal organs. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 120 (1950), 269–310.Google Scholar

Bellairs, A d’A. and Boyd, J. D., The lachrymal apparatus in lizards and snakes – I. The brille, the orbital glands, lachrymal canaliculi and origin of the lachrymal duct. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 117 (1947), 81–108.Google Scholar

Uetz, P., Freed, P., Aguilar, R. and Hošek, J., The Reptile Database. www.reptile-database.org (accessed March 10, 2021).Google Scholar

Book contents

Part IV - Neurobiological Perspectives

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part IV - Neurobiological Perspectives

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive