Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T21:17:34.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - A ‘Godlike Science’

English Teaching in Secondary Schools

from Part III - English in Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2019

By
Rachel Roberts
Edited by
Christopher J. Hall  and
Rachel Wicaksono
Christopher J. Hall
Affiliation:
York St John University
Rachel Wicaksono
Affiliation:
York St John University
Get access

Summary

In Mary Shelley’s gothic creation Frankenstein, the Creature’s learning of language is described as something sublime: “[he]… perceived that the words they spoke sometimes produced pleasure or pain, smiles or sadness, in the minds and countenances of the hearers. This was indeed a godlike science” (Shelley, 1818/2000, p. 103). In terms of linguistic development, the Creature’s learning that occurs from simply watching and listening to the day-to-day lives of a family of French exiles through a hole in the wall is quite naïve; there is no interaction between the Creature and the family, Shelley presumably conceiving him as a blank slate. Over time, the Creature realises an association between the signs in the books read by the exiles and speech, a tacit acknowledgement of the arbitrary link between word symbols and the nature of the sounds when spoken. The Creature does not explain exactly how he was able to learn what he calls the ‘science of letters’; his focus is on describing how learning to read “opened before me a wide field of wonder and delight” (p. 108). The affective impact of understanding language underlines the tragedy of the Creature: now that his mind has been ‘opened’ by language, he begins to wonder about the world and himself. In a Cartesian sense, the Creature thinks himself into existence as he grapples with his own identity through language: “the words induced me to turn towards myself … And what was I?” (p. 108). Language has provided thought, identity, and therefore existence.

Keywords

Englishsecondary educationschool subject Englishmetaphors for learningNational Curriculumeducational policy
Type
Chapter
Information
Ontologies of English
Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment
 , pp. 122 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsup, J. (2015). A Case for Teaching Literature in the Secondary School. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
AQA. (2016). GCSE English Language Specification. Online. Available from http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/english/specifications/AQA-8700-SP-2015.PDFGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1975/1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Barton, G. (2013). Don’t Call It Literacy!. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bleiman, B. (2016). Online. Group Work – Had We But Time Enough. Available from www.englishandmedia.co.uk/blog/group-work-had-we-but-time-enoughGoogle Scholar
Boulter, S. (2017). Education from a biological point of view. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (1979). “Godlike Science/Unhallowed Arts”: Language, nature, and monstrosity. The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 205–220.Google Scholar
Coughlan, S. (2016). Online. Accessed 27 June 2018 from www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-38157811Google Scholar
Davison, J. and Daly, C. (2014). Learning to Teach English in the Secondary School. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2010). Online. Available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110202094241/http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/primaryGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2011). Online. Available from www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standardsGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2013). Online. Available from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244215/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_English2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2014). The National Curriculum in England Framework Document. Online. Available from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381344/Master_final_national_curriculum_28_Nov.pdfGoogle Scholar
DES and the Welsh Office. (1989). English for Ages 5–16, (The Cox Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. (1967). Growth through English. Huddersfield: NATE Publications.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. (2009). English renewed: Visions of English among teachers of 1966. English in Education, 43 (3), 241–250.Google Scholar
Dominiczak, P. (2013). Online. Accessed 27 June 2018 from www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10166020/Michael-Gove-new-curriculum-will-allow-my-children-to-compete-with-the-very-best.htmlGoogle Scholar
Douthwaite, A. (2015). Stone cold: Worthy of study? Changing English, 22(1), 14–25.Google Scholar
Eaglestone, R. (2002). Doing English. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enstone, L. (2017). Time to Stop PEE-ing? Teaching English (13), 33–36.Google Scholar
Findlay, K. (2010). The Professional Identity of English Teachers in the Secondary School. Coventry, BERA.Google Scholar
Gardner, P. (2017). Worlds apart: A comparative analysis of discourses of English in the curricula of England and Australia. Education in English, 51(2), 170–187.Google Scholar
Gibb, N. (2015). How E. D. Hirsch Came to Shape UK Government Policy. London: Policy Exchange. Also online. Accessed 26 June 2018 from policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/knowledge-and-the-curriculum.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, S. (2014). The London Association for the Teaching of English 1947–67: A History. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. and Mason, J. (2015). ‘Well I don’t feel that’: Schemas, worlds and authentic reading in the classroom. English in Education, 49(1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (1992). English teachers and the Cox models. English in Education, 4–10.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2011). The Expert Teacher of English. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, A. and McIntyre, J. (2011). ‘What is English?’. Becoming a Reflective English Teacher. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill, 6–25.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. (1999). The Schools We Need: And Why We Don’t Have Them. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Husbands, C. (2015). Which Knowledge Matters Most? London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Jones, S., Myhill, D., and Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation into the effect of contextualised grammar teaching on student writing. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1241–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, B. (2015). English studies: A very brief history. In Brindley, S. and Marshal, B., eds., Masterclass in English Education (pp. 5–15). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (2008/1948). The Great Tradition. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1690/2004). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Locke, T. (2015). Paradigms of English. In Brindley, S. and Marshal, B., eds., Masterclass in English Education (pp. 5–15). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
McCallum, A. (2012). Creativity and Learning in Secondary in English. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Medway, P. (1980). Finding a Language. London: Chameleon.Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (2008). The Guided Construction of Knowledge. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Middlesex University. (2018). Online. Accessed 26 June 2018 from www.mdx.ac.uk/courses/undergraduate/englishGoogle Scholar
Ofsted (2012). Moving English Forward. Online. Available from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181204/110118.pdfGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. (2011). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Online. Accessed 31 July 2018 from www.oed.comGoogle Scholar
Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., and Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker – School League Tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
QAA. (2015). Subject Benchmark Statement: English. Online. Available from www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/sbs-english-15.pdf?sfvrsn=4f9df781_12Google Scholar
QCA. (2007). English Programme of Study for Key Stage 3 and Attainment Targets. Online. Available from http://archive.teachfind.com/qcda/curriculum.qcda.gov.uk/uploads/QCA-07-3332-pEnglish3_tcm8–399.pdfGoogle Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical Criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew Effect. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, H. (2017). Neither Bleak House nor Liberty Hall: English in the curriculum. In Richmond, J., ed., Harold Rosen: Writings on Life, Language and Learning, 1958–2008 (pp. 73–89). London: UCL, Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
Royal Holloway, University of London. (2018). Online. Accessed 31 July 2018 from www.royalholloway.ac.uk/studying-here/undergraduate/english/english/Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
Shelley, M. (1818/2000). Frankenstein. Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s.Google Scholar
Snow, C. (2008). The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinbeck, J. (1937/2000). Of Mice and Men. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Swindells, R. (1993). Stone Cold. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Warner, L. (2004). To PEE or Not to PEE? When there’s a question. The Secondary English Magazine, 20–21.Google Scholar
Womack, P. (1993). What are essays for? English in Education, 27(2), 42–48.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. (2014). The Social Construction of Meaning: Reading Literature in Urban English Classrooms. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, M. (2009). Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×