Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:42:24.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

Martin Holbraad  and
Morten Axel Pedersen
Martin Holbraad
Affiliation:
University College London
Morten Axel Pedersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Ontological Turn
An Anthropological Exposition
 , pp. 299 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Benjamin. 2014a. ‘Archaeology, risk, and the alter-politics of materiality’. Fieldsights – Commentary. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/476-archaeology-risk-and-the-alter-politics-of-materiality (accessed 28 June 2015).Google Scholar
Alberti, Benjamin. 2014b. ‘Designing body-pots in the formative La Candelaria culture, Northwest Argentina’, in Halam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.), Making and Growing: Anthropological Studies of Organisms and Artefacts, pp. 107–26. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Alberti, Benjamin and Marshall, Yvonne. 2009. ‘Animating archaeology: local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 344–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Benjamin, Fowles, Severin, Holbraad, Martin, Marshall, Yvonne and Witmore, Christopher. 2011. ‘“Worlds otherwise”: archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference’. Current Anthropology 52 (6): 896–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell Pearson, Keith. 1999. Germinal Life. The Difference and Repetition of Deleuze. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, pp. 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.Google Scholar
Argyrou, Vassos. 2002. Anthropology and the Will to Meaning: A Postcolonial Critique. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, , Jan. 2008. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel, and the Rise of Monotheism Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikael. 1965. Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargués-Pedreny, , Pol, , Koddenbrock, , Kai, , Schmidt, , Jessica, , and Schmidt, , Mario, (eds.). 2015. Ends of Critique. Global Dialogues 10. Duisburg: Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research.Google Scholar
Barker, John. 2003. ‘Christian bodies: dialectics of sickness and salvation among the Maisin of Papua New Guinea’. Journal of Religious History 27 (3): 272–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, John. 2010. ‘The varieties of Melanesian Christian experience: a comment on Mosko’s “Partible Penitents”’. JRAI 16 (1): 247–9.Google Scholar
Barnard, Alan. 2000. History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1958. Naven. 2nd edn. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglia, Debbora. 1990. On the Bones of the Serpent: Person, Memory, and Mortality in Sabarl Island Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony and Frow, John (eds.). 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1965. Duration and Simultaneity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1999. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Copenhagen: Green Integer.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 2005. Matter and Memory. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Berliner, David, Legrain, Laurent and van de Por, Mattijs. 2013. ‘Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns’. Social Anthropology 21 (4): 435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertselsen, Bjørn E. 2014 ‘Maize mill sorcery. Cosmologies of substance, production and accumulation engaged in central Mozambique’, in Allen Abramson and Martin Holbraad (eds.), Framing Cosmologies: The Anthropology of Worlds, pp. 199–220. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bessire, Lucas and Bond, David. 2014. ‘Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique’. American Ethnologist 41(3): 440–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1994. Plato, Etc.: The Problems of Philosophy and Their Resolution. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bialecki, John, Haynes, Naomi and Robbins, Joel. 2008. ‘The anthropology of Christianity’. Religion Compass 2: 1139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, Mikkel. 2013. ‘Dealing with dead saints’, in Christensen, D. R. and Willerslev, R. (eds.), Taming Time, Timing Death. Social Technologies and Ritual, pp. 137–55. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bille, Mikkel. 2015. ‘Hazy worlds: atmospheric ontologies in Denmark’. Anthropological Theory 15 (3): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, Mikkel, Frida, Hastrup, and Tim Flohr, Sørensen (eds.). 2010. An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Binkley, Sam and Capetillo, Jorge. 2009. A Foucault for the 21th Century: Governmentality, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bird-David, Nurit. 1999. ‘Animism revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology’. Current Anthropology 40 (supplement): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, Mario. 2009. ‘The threat of the Yrmo: the political ontology of a sustainable hunting program’. American Anthropologist 111 (1): 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, Mario. 2010. Storytelling Globalization from the Chaco and Beyond. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Blaser, Mario. 2013. ‘Ontological conflicts and stories of peoples in spite of Europe: toward a conversation on political ontology’. Current Anthropology 54(5): 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, Mario. 2014. ‘The political ontology of doing difference and sameness.’ Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/474-the-political-ontology-of-doing-difference-and-sameness (accessed 13 January 2014).Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. 1977. ‘The past and the present in the present’. Man (N.S.) 12 (2): 278–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. 1992. From Prey into Hunter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1940. Race, Language and Culture. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom. 2016. ‘For whom the ontology turns: theorizing the digital real’. Current Anthropology 57(4). Current Anthropology website, www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/687362 (accessed 28 July 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogost, Ian. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like Be a Thing (Posthumanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, David. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonelli, Cristóbal. 2012. ‘Ontological disorders: nightmares, psychotropic drugs and evil spirits in southern Chile’. Anthropological Theory 12 (4), 407–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonelli, Cristóbal. 2015. ‘To see that which cannot be seen: ontological differences and public health policies in Southern Chile’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 21: 872–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Georgina. 2005. ‘On musical mediation: ontology, technology and creativity’. Twentieth-century Music 2(01): 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Georgina. 2010. ‘The social and the aesthetic: for a post-Bourdieuian theory of cultural production’. Cultural Sociology 4(2): 171–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2009. ‘A plea for pleats’, in Jensen, C. B. and Rödje, K. (eds.), Deleuzian Intersections: Science, Technology, Anthropology, pp. 123–38. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Brightman, Marc, Grotti, Vanessa and Ulturgasheva, Olga (eds.). 2014. Animism in Rainforest and Tundra. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. 1968. An Empty Space: A Book about the Theatre – Deadly, Holy, Rough, Immediate. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Broz, Ludek 2007. ‘Pastoral perspectivism: a view from Altai’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Levi R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Levi R., Srnicek, Nick and Harman, Graham. 2011. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.pressGoogle Scholar
Bubandt, Nils. 2014. The Empty Seashell. Witchcraft and Doubt on an Indonesian Island. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bubandt, Nils and Otto, Ton (eds.). 2010. Experiments with Holism. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buckley, Thomas. 1996. ‘“The Little History of Pitiful Events”: the epistemological and moral contexts of Kroeber’s Californian ethnology’, in Stocking, G. (ed.), Volksgeist as Method and Ethic. Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, pp. 257–97. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bumochir, Dulam. 2014. ‘Institutionalization of Mongolian shamanism: from primitivism to civilization’. Asian Ethnicity 15 (4): 473–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyandelger, Manduhai. 2013. Tragic Spirits: Shamanism, Socialism, and the State of Neoliberalism in Mongolia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel and Latour, Bruno. 1981. ‘Unscrewing the big Leviathan; or how actors macrostructure reality, and how sociologists help them to do so?’, in Knorr, K. and Cicourel, A. (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, pp. 277–303. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2010a. ‘“I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat.” Engagement and detachment in human-animal relations’. American Ethnologist 37 (2): 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, Matei. (ed.) 2010b. The Social after Gabriel Tarde. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2010c. ‘For the motion: ontology is just another word for culture. Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester’, Critique of Anthropology, 30 (2), 172–9.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2011a. ‘Endo/Exo’. Common Knowledge 17 (1): 146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2011b. ‘Our division of the universe: making space for the non-political in the anthropology of politics’. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2012. ‘Different species, one theory: reflections on anthropomorphism and anthropological comparison’. Cambridge Anthropology 30 (2): 118–35.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2014. ‘The ontology of the political turn’. Fieldsights – Commentary. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/469-the-ontology-of-the-political-turn (accessed 22 April 2015).Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2015 ‘Going full frontal, or, the elision of lateral comparison in anthropology’. CRASSH Sawyer Seminar 25/09/2015. Available at: www.mateicandea.net/?p=962 (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Candea, Matei and Alcayna-Stevens, Lys. 2012. ‘Internal others: ethnographies of naturalism’. Cambridge Anthropology 30 (2): 36–47.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei, Cook, Joanne, Trundle, Catherine and Yarrow, Tom (eds.). 2015. Detachment: Essays on the Limits of Relational Thinking. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Cannell, Fanella (ed.). 2006. The Anthropology of Christianity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro da Cunha, Manuela and de Castro, Eduardo Viveiros (eds.). 1993. Amazônia: etnologia e história indígena. São Paulo: NHII-USP/FAPESP.Google Scholar
Carrier, James (ed.). 1992a. History and Tradition in Melanesian Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, James. 1992b. ‘Occidentalism: the world turned upside-down’. American Ethnologist 19 (2): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, James. 1998 ‘Property and social relations in Melanesian Anthropology’, in Hann, C. (ed.), Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, pp. 85–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2014. ‘An inteview with Marilyn Strathern: kinship and career’. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (2/3): 263–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 2002. ‘On sense and intension’, in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 16: Language and Mind, pp. 135–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charbonnier, Pierre, Salmon, Gildas and Skafish, Peter (eds.). 2016. Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Charlier, Bernard. 2015. Faces of the Wolf. Managing the Human, Non-human Boundary in Mongolia. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Liana. 2009. ‘To know or not to know? Practices of knowledge and ignorance among Bidayuhs in an “impurely” Christian world’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N. S.) 15: 332–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chumley, Lily H. and Harkness, Nicholas. 2013. ‘Introduction: Qualia’. Anthropological Theory 13 (1/2): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David J.. 1998. ‘The Extended Mind’. Analysis 58: 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clastres, Pierre. 1974. “Échange et pouvoir: Philosophie de la Chefferie Indienne.” In La société contre l’État: Recherches d’anthropologie politique, pp. 25–42. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James and Marcus, George E. (eds.). 1986. Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John. 1998. ‘Occult economies and the violence of abstraction: notes from the south african postcolony’. American Ethnologist 26 (3): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conneller, Chantal. 2011. An Archaeology of Materials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corsín-Jimenez, Alberto. 2007. ‘Well-being in anthropological balance: remarks on proportionality as political imagination’, in Corsín-Jimenez, A. (ed.), Culture and Well-Being. Anthropological Approaches to Freedom and Political Ethics, pp. 180–200. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Corsín-Jimenez, Alberto. 2013. An anthropological trompe l’oeil for a common world. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsín-Jimenez, Alberto. (ed.). 2014. ‘Prototyping cultures: art, science and politics in beta’. Special Issue, Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4).Google Scholar
Corsín-Jimenez, Alberto. 2015. Anthropology: a prototype. Social Anthropology 23 (3): 348–50.Google Scholar
Corsín-Jiménez, Alberto, and Rane, Willerslev. 2007. ‘An anthropological concept of the concept: Reversability among the Siberian Yukaghirs’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 13: 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Course, Magnus. 2010. ‘Of words and fog: linguistic relativity and Amerindian ontology’. Anthropological Theory, 10: 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, Simon. 2012. Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Crook, Tony. 2007. Anthropological Knowledge, Secrecy and Bolivip, Papua New Guinea: Exchanging Skin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Csordas. 1994. The Sacred Self: A Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic Healing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
da Col, Giovanni. 2007. ‘The view from somewhen: events, bodies and the perspective of fortune around Khawa Karpo, a Tibetan sacred mountain in Yunnan province’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 215–35.Google Scholar
da Col, Giovanni and Graeber, David. 2011. ‘Foreword: The return of ethnographic theory.’ HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): vi–xxxv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsgaard, Anne Line. 2004. Matters of Life and Longing: Female Sterilisation in Northeast Brazil. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Dant, Tim. 2005. Materiality and Society. Maldenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1986. ‘Personality and culture: the fate of the Sapirian alternative’, in Stocking, G. (ed.), Malinowski, Rivers, Benedict and Others. Essays on Culture and Personality, pp. 156–83. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. ‘Indigenous cosmopolitics: conceptual reflections beyond politics as usual’. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Cadena, Marisol. 2014. ‘The politics of modern politics meets ethnographies of excess through ontological openings’. Available at: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/463-what-an-ontological-anthropology-might-mean (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
De la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, Marisol, Lien, Marianne E., Blaser, Mario, Jensen, Casper Bruun, Lea, Tess, Morita, Atsuro, Swanson, Heather, Ween, Gro, West, Paige and Wiener, Margaret. 2015. ‘Anthropology and STS: generative interfaces’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 437–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Landa, Manuel. 2002. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
De Landa, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Translated and with a foreword by James Conley. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is Philosophy? Translated by Garahm Bell and Hugh Tomlinson. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Demian, Melissa. 2007. ‘Canoe, mission boat, freighter: the life history of a Melanesian relationship’. Paideuma 53: 89–109.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 1992. ‘Societies of nature and the nature of society’, in Kuper, A. (ed.), Conceptualising Society, pp. 107–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 1996. ‘Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice’, in Descola, P. and Pálsson, G. (eds.), Nature and Society – Anthropological perspectives, pp. 82.102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 2014. ‘Modes of being and forms of predication’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjarlais, Robert. 1992. Body and Emotion: The Aesthetics of Healing in the Nepal Himalayas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Desjarlais, Robert and Throop, C. Jason. 2011. ‘Phenomenological approaches in anthropology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Giminiani, Piero. 2013. ‘The contested rewe: sacred sites, misunderstandings and ontological pluralism in Mapuche land negotiations’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (3): 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, Roy (ed). 1999. The Problem of Context: Perspectives from Social Anthropology and Elsewhere. Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez Rubio, Fernando. 2016. ‘On the discrepancy between objects and things. An ecological approach’. Journal of Material Culture. UC San Diego. Available at: http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc/item/09z5n5n2 (accessed 15 February 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulley, Iracema. 2015. Os nomes dos outros: etnografia e diferença em Roy Wagner. São Paulo: Humanitas, FAPESP.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. Translated by W. D. Halls. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 2006. On Suicide. Trans. Robin Buss. London: Penguin ClassicsGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile, and Marcel, Mauss. (1963). Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1991. The Myth of Eternal Return, or, Cosmos and History. Translated by Willard R. Trask. London: Arkana.Google Scholar
Elliot, Alice. 2016. ‘The make-up of destiny: Predestination and the labor of hope in a Moroccan emigrant town’. American Ethnologist 43(3): 488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Joe. 2015. ‘Assembling contexts. the making of political-economic potentials in shamanic workshop in Ulaanbaatar’. Inner Asia 17: 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, 1982. ‘The case for methodological individualism’. Theory and Society, 11: 453–82.Google Scholar
Empson, Rebecca. 2007. ‘Separating and containing: people and things in Mongolia’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things. Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 113–40. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Engelke, Matthew, 2007. A Problem of Presence: Beyond Scripture in an African Church. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Engelke, Matthew. (ed.). 2008. ‘The objects of evidence’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(S1): S1–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englund, Harri and Yarrow, Tom. 2013. ‘The place of theory: rights, networks, and ethnographic comparison’. Social Analysis 57 (3): 132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2007. Globalization: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 2007. ‘The “Ontological Turn” in social theory: a commentary on “Human Geography without Scale” by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 106–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Osterweil, Michal. 2010. ‘Social movements and the politics of the virtual: Deleuzian strategies’, in Jensen, C. Bruun and Rödje, K. (eds.), Deleuzian Intersections: Science, Technology, Anthropology, pp. 187–217. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1956. Nuer Religion. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Even, Marie-Dominique. 1988–89. ‘Chants de chamanes de mongols’. Études Mongoles...et sibériennes 19–20.Google Scholar
Evens, Terence M. S. 1983. ‘Mind, logic, and the efficacy of the Nuer incest prohibition’. Man (N. S.) 18 (1): 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evens, Terence M.S.. 2008. Anthropology as Ethics: Nondualism and the Conduct of Sacrifice. Oxford & New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evens, Terence M. S. and Handelman, Don (eds.) 2006. The Manchester School: Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology. Oxford & New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto, Carlos. 2007. ‘Feasting on people: eating animals and humans in Amazonia’. Current Anthropology 48 (4): 518–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-politics Machine: ‘Development,’ De-politicization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fortis, Paulo. 2009. ‘The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 16 (3): 480–95.Google Scholar
Fortis, Paulo. 2010. ‘The birth of design: A Kuna theory of body and personhood’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16: 480–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Jay. 2011. ‘Ontologies without metaphysics: Latour, Harman and the philosophy of things’. Analecta Hermeneutica 3: 1–26.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1985. The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Fowles, Severin. 2008. ‘The perfect subject: Postcolonial object studies’. Paper at Annual Conference of Theoretical Archaeology Group, 24 May, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Fowles, Severin. 2010. ‘People without things’, in Bille, M. et al. (eds.), An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss, pp. 23–41. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jonathan. 2001. ‘The iron cage of creativity: an exploration’, in Liep, J. (ed.), Locating Cultural Creativity, pp. 46–61. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jonathan. 2006. ‘Comment on Searle’s “Social ontology”: the reality of the imaginary and the cunning of the non-intentional’. Anthropological Theory 6 (1): 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, Ahustín and Kohn, Eduardo. 2012. ‘Two proposals’. Cambridge Anthropology 30 (2): 136–46.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Edward. 2008. Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critics. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad, Christopher and Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2010. ‘On the consequences of post-ANT’. Science, Technology and Human Values 19: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad, Christopher, Jensen, Casper Bruun and Winthereik, Brit Ross. 2015. ‘Practical ontology: Worlds in STS and anthropology.’ NatureCulture 3:1–24.Google Scholar
Gatt, Caroline. 2013. ‘Vectors, direction of attention and unprotected backs: re-specifying relations in anthropology’. Anthropological Theory 13 (4): 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geismar, Haidy. 2011. ‘“Material Culture Studies” and other ways to theorize objects: a primer to a regional debate’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 53(1): 210–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1992. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1999. ‘Strathernograms, or the semiotics of mixed metaphors’, in Hirsch, E. (ed.), The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams. LSE Monographs on Social Anthropology, Volume 67, pp. 29–75. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Geschiere, Peter. 1997. The Modernity of Witchcraft: Politics and the Occult in Postcolonial Africa. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2015. ‘Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality”: a reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Sarah F. 2005. Notes from the Balkans: Locating Marginality and Ambiguity on the Greek-Albanian Border. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Sarah F. 2014. ‘Anthropological knots: Conditions of possibilities and interventions’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Akhil and Ferguson, James (eds.). 1997. Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hage, Ghassan. 2012. ‘Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, Ghassan. 2014. ‘Critical anthropology as a permanent state of first contact’. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/473-critical-anthropology-as-a-permanent-state-of-first-contact (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Hallowell, Alfred I. 1960. ‘Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view’, in Diamond, S. (ed.), Culture in History. Essays in Honor of Paul Radin, pp. 19–52. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1993. Cultural Complexity. Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2010. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Hants, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Hants, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.. 1991. ‘A cyborg manifesto: science, technology and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century’, in Haraway, D. (ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149–81. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.. 1992. ‘The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others’, in Grossberg, L., Nelson, C. and Treichler, P. (eds.), Cultural Studies, pp. 295–337. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Oliver J. T. and Robb, John. 2012. ‘Multiple ontologies and the problem of the body in history’. American Anthropologist 114 (4): 668–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Keith. 2001. ‘Cultural critique in Anthropology’, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences vol. 5, pp. 3037–41. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Harvey, Graham. 2005. Animism: Respecting the Living World. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Hastrup, Frida. 2011. ‘Shady plantations: theorizing coastal shelter in Tamil Nadu’. Anthropological Theory 11 (4): 435–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastrup, Kirsten. 1990. ‘The ethnographic present: a reinvention’. Cultural Anthropology 5 (1): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastrup, Kirsten. 2004. ‘Getting it right: knowledge and evidence in anthropology’. Anthropological Theory 4 (4): 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Terence E. 1986. ‘Sacred flutes, fertility and growth in the papua New Guinea highlands’. Anthropos 81: 435–53.Google Scholar
Hegel, George W. F. 2006. Hegel: Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion One-Volume Edition: The Lectures of 1827. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time: A Translation of Zein und Zeit. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Steven. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Steven. 2012. ‘Extraterrestrial relativism’. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4): 1115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henare, Amiria. 2007. ‘Taonga Mäori: encompassing rights and property in New Zealand’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things: Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 47–67. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henare, Amiria, Holbraad, Martin and Wastell, Sari (eds.). 2007. Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artifacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, Paolo. 2012. ‘Anthropology and what there is: reflections on “ontology”’. Cambridge Anthropology 30: 143–51.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paolo. 2015. ‘Equivocal locations: being “red” in “Red Bologna”’. JRAI 21: 855–71.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Eric. 2008. ‘God or tidibe? Melanesian Christianity and the problem of wholes’. Ethnos 73: 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Eric. 2014. ‘Melanesian ethnography and the comparative project of anthropology: reflection on Strathern’s analogical approach’. Theory, Culture & Society 31(2–3): 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Eric, and Strathern, Marilyn (eds.). 2004. Transactions and Creations: The Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J. and Ranger, Terence O. (eds.). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, Matt. 2008. ‘Rethinking time’s arrow. Bergson, Deleuze and the anthropology of time’. Anthropological Theory 8 (4): 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogsden, Carl and Salmond, Amiria. 2016. ‘Ghosts in the Machine?’. Theorizing the Contemporary. Cultural Anthropology website. Available at https://culanth.org/fieldsights/830-ghosts-in-the-machine (accessed 01 September 2016).Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2003. ‘Estimando a necessidade: os oráculos de ifá e a verdade em Havana’. Mana 9(2): 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2004. ‘Response to Bruno Latour’s “Thou shall not freeze-frame”‘. Available at: https://sites.google.com/a/abaetenet.net/nansi/abaetextos/response-to-bruno-latours-thou-shall-not-freeze-frame-martin-holbraad (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2005. ‘Expending multiplicity: money in Cuban Ifá cults’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 11 (2): 231–54.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2007. ‘The power of powder: multiplicity and motion in the divinatory cosmology of Cuban Ifá (or Mana, Again)’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M., and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 189–225. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2009. ‘Ontology, ethnography, archaeology: an afterword on the ontography of things’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 431–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2010. ‘The whole beyond holism: gambling, divination and ethnography in Cuba.’, in Otto, T. and Bubandt, N. (eds.), Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology, pp. 67–85. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2012. Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2013a. ‘Scoping recursivity: a comment on Franklin and Napier’. Cambridge Anthropology 31 (2): 123–7.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2013b. ‘Revolución o muerte: self-sacrifice and the ontology of Cuban revolution’. Ethnos. 79 (3): 365–87.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. In press a. ‘How myths make men in Afro-Cuban divination’, in Pitarch, P. and Kelly, J.A. (eds.), The Culture of Invention in the Americas. Cambridge: Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. In press b. ‘The contingency of concepts: transcendental deduction and ethnographic expression in anthropological thinking’, in Charbonier, P., Salmon, G. and Skafish, P. (eds.), Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2009. ‘Planet M: The intense abstraction of Marilyn Strathern’. Anthropological Theory 9 (4): 371–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012. ‘Revolutionary securitization: an anthropological extension of securitization theory’. International Theory 4 (2): 165–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin and Pedersen, Morten Axel. (eds.). 2013. Times of Security: Ethnographies of Fear, Protest and the Future. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin, Pedersen, Morten Axel and de Castro, Eduardo Viveiros. 2014. ‘The politics of ontology: anthropological positions’. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions (accessed 4 June 2015).Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin and Willerslev, Rane. 2007. ‘Afterword: transcendental perspectivism: anonymous viewpoints from Inner Asia’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 329–45.Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted (ed.). 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Cymene and Pandian, Anand. 2016. ‘Lexicon for an anthropocene yet unseen’. Theorizing the Contemporary. Cultural Anthropology website, www.culanth.org/fieldsights/803-lexicon-for-an-anthropocene-yet-unseen (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Howell, Signe. 1989. Society and Cosmos: Chewong of Peninsular Malaysia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Højer, Lars. 2009. ‘Absent powers: magic and loss in postsocialist Mongolia’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 15 (3): 575–91.Google Scholar
Højer, Lars and Pedersen, Morten Axel. In press. Urban Hunters. Dealing and Dreaming in Times of Transition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1996. Shamans and Elders. Experience, Knowledge, and Power among the Daur Mongols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2007 ‘Inside and outside the mirror: Mongolian shaman’s mirrors as instruments of perspectivism’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2008. ‘Reassembling individual subjects. Events and decisions in troubled times’. Anthropological Theory 8 (4): 357–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1992. ‘Editorial’. Man 27(1): 694–7.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1996. ‘Hunting and gathering as ways of perceiving the environment’. In Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture, and Domestication (eds.) R. Ellen & K. Fukui. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1997. ‘Eight themes in the anthropology of technology’. Social Analysis 41(1): 106–38.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1998. ‘Totemism, animism, and the depiction of animals’. In Animal. Anima. Animus (eds.) M. Seppälä, J-P. Vanhala & L. Weintraub. Pori: Pori Art Museum.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2007. ‘Materials against materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2008. ‘When ANT meets SPIDER: Social theory for arthropods’, in Knappet, C. and Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, pp. 209–15. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2014. ‘That’s enough about ethnography!’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, Miho. 2012. ‘Acting with things: self-poiesis, actuality, and contingency in the formation of divine worlds’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (2): 371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Michael (ed.). 1996. Things as They Are. New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michael. 1998. Minima Ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the Anthropological Project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun 2004. ‘A nonhumanist disposition: on performativity, practical ontology, and interventions’. Configurations 12 (2): 229–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2012. ‘Proposing the motion: “the task of anthropology is to invent relations”’. Critique of Anthropology 32: 47–53.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2013. ‘Two forms of the outside. Castaneda, Blanchot, ontology’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3): 309–35.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2014a. ‘Practical Ontologies.’ Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/466-practical-ontologies (accessed 13 January 2014).Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2014b. ‘Experiments in good faith and hopelessness. Toward a postcritical social science’. Common Knowledge 20 (2): 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2015. ‘Experimenting with political materials: environmental infrastructure and ontological transformations’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun. In press. ‘Multinatural infrastructures: the many natures and cultures of Phnom Penh’s sewage system’, in Harvey, P., Jensen, C. B. and Morita, A. (eds.), Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Routledge Companion. London and New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun and Rödje, Kjetil (eds.). 2009. Deleuzian Intersections in Science, Technology and Anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun, Pedersen, Morten Axel and Winthereik, Brit Ross (eds.). 2011. ‘Comparative Relativism’, special issue of Common Knowledge 17 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun and Morita, Atsuro (eds.). 2012. ‘Anthropology as critique of reality: a Japanese turn’. Forum in HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (2): 358–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Casper Bruun and Winthereik, Brit Ross. 2013. Monitoring Movements in Development Aid: Recursive Infrastructures and Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaret, Jolly. 1992. ‘Partible persons and multiple authors’. Pacific Studies 15 (1): 137–48.Google Scholar
Josephides, Lisette. 1991. ‘Metaphors, metathemes, and the construction of sociality: a critique of the new Melanesian ethnography’. Man (N.S.) 26: 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapferer, Bruce. 1991. A Celebration of Demons. Exorcism and the Aesthetics of Healing in Sri Lanka. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kapferer, Bruce. 2010. Legends of People, Myths of State: Violence, Intolerance, and Political Culture in Sri Lanka and Australia. Oxford: Berghahn Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian Moderns. Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2013. ‘Ontologies, anthropologists, and ethical lives’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger. 1992. Review of ‘Marilyn Strathern “The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia”’. Pacific Studies 15 (1): 129–37.Google Scholar
Kelly, Anne. 2011. ‘Entomological extensions: model huts and fieldworks’, in Edwards, J. and Petrovic-Steger, M. (eds.), Recasting Anthropological Knowledge: Inspiration and Social Science, pp.70–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John (ed.). 2014. The Ontological French Turn. Colloquium in HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 259–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, José Antonio. 2005. ‘Fractality and the exchange of perspectives’, in Mosko, M. S., and Frederick, H. D. (eds.), On the Order of Chaos. Social Anthropology and the Science of Chaos, pp. 108–35. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Kelly, José Antonio. 2011. State Healthcare and Yanomami Transformations: A Symmetrical Ethnography. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Kerridge, Ian. 2003. ‘Altruism or reckless curiosity? A brief history of self-experimentation in medicine’. Internal Medicine Journal 33: 203–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros (eds.). 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, Hannah and Walford, Antonia (eds.). 2016. ‘Is there an ontology to the digital?’ Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/conversations/17-theorizing-the-contemporary (accessed 1 September 2016).Google Scholar
Knudsen, Are J. 1998. ‘Beyond cultural relativism? Tim Ingold’s “ontology of dwelling”’. CMI Working Paper WP 1998: 7. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2008. ‘How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of trans-species engagement’. American Ethnologist 34 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. London & Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2014. ‘What an ontological anthropology might mean’. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/463-what-an-ontological-anthropology-might-mean (accessed 15 June 2015).Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2015. ‘Anthropology of ontologies’. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind. 1986. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Benedikte. 2007. ‘The human perspective’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krøijer, Stine. 2015. Figurations of the Future: Forms and Temporality of Left Radical Politics in Northern Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2000. Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Hilda. 1984. ‘Function, history, biography: reflections on fifty years in the British anthropological tradition’, in Stocking, G. (ed.), Functionalism Historicized. Essays on British Social Anthropology, pp. 192–213. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Küchler, Susanne. 1988. ‘Malangan: objects, sacrifice, and the production of memory’. American Ethnologist 15 (4): 625–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küchler, Susanne. 2002. Malanggan: Art, Memory and Sacrifice. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2012. ‘Ontologically challenged’. Anthropology of this Century 4, Available at: http://aotcpress.com/articles/ontologically-challenged (accessed 22 April 2015).Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2013. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, James and Heywood, Paolo. 2013. ‘One more turn and you’re there’. Anthropology of This Century, vol. 7, London, May 2013. Available at: http://aotcpress.com/articles/turn/ (accessed 15 January 2016).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1988. Irréductions. Published with The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1990. ‘The force and the reason of experiment’, in Le Grand, H. E. (ed.), Experimental Inquiries, pp. 49–80. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004a. ‘Whose cosmos, whose cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck’. Common Knowledge 10 (3): 450–92.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004b. ‘“Não congelarás a imagem”, ou: como não desentender o debate ciência-religião’. Mana 10 (2): 349–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004c. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2009. ‘Perspectivism: type or bomb?’ Anthropology Today 25 (2): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2010a. On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2010b. ‘An attempt at a “compositionist manifesto”’. New Literary History 41: 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Translated by Cathy Porter. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2014a. ‘What is the style of matters of concern’, in Gaskill, N. and Nocek, A. J. (eds.), The Lure of Whitehead, pp. 92–127. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2014b. ‘Agency at the time of the anthropocene’. New Literary History 45 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Jensen, Pablo, Venturini, Tommaso, Grauwin, Sébastian and Boullier, Dominique. 2012. ‘The whole is always smaller than the parts – a digital test of Gabriel Tarde’s monads’. British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 590–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 2000. ‘Transitivities’. Society and Space 18: 133–48.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie (eds.). 2002. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Tony. 2012. ‘Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (2): 345–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, Robert. 2003. ‘Art and Agency: a reassessment’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (3): 447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, James. 2003. Creative Land: Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Leach, James. 2004. ‘Modes of creativity’, in Hirsch, E. and Strathern, M. (eds.), Transactions and Creations: The Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia, pp.151–75. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Leach, James. 2007. ‘Differentiation and encompassment: a critique of Alfred Gell’s theory of the abduction of creativity’, in Henare, et al. (eds.), Thinking Through Things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically, pp. 167–88. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leach, James. 2014. ‘Choreographic Objects: Contemporary dance, digital creations and prototyping social visibility’. Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4): 458–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebner, Ashley. 2016. La redescription de l'anthropologie selon Marilyn Strathern. L'Homme 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemonnier, Pierre. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenclud, Gérard, Helmreich, Stefan, Feuchtwang, Stephan, Kapferer, Bruce, Toren, Christina, Michael, Lambek, Coelho de Souza, Marcela and Descola, Philippe. 2014. ‘Book Symposium – Beyond nature and culture (Philippe Descola)’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3): 363–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1954. ‘The mathematics of man’. International Social Science Bulletin 6: 581–90.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1964. Totemism. Translated by R. Needham. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Translated by George Weidenfield and Nicholson Ltd. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Raw and the Cooked: Introduction to a Science of Mythology. Translated by John and Doreen Weightman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1979. From Honey to Ashes. Translated by John Weightman and Doreen Weightman. London: Octagon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1990a. The Origin of Table Manners. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1990b. The Naked Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lien, Marianne and Law, John. 2011. ‘“Emergent Aliens”: on salmon, nature, and their enactment’. Ethnos 76 (1): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, Marianne and Law, John. 2012. ‘Slippery: field notes on empirical ontology’. Social Studies of Science. 43 (3): 363–78.Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark. 2008. The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics, and the Modern West. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Lima, Tania Stolze. 1999. ‘The two and its many: reflections on perspectivism in a Tupi cosmology’. Ethnos 64 (1): 107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2007. Cognitive Variations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R.. 2011. ‘Humanity between gods and beasts? Ontologies in question’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 17: 829–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R.. 2012. Being, Humanity, and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhrmann, Tanya M. 2012. When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhrmann, Tanya M.. 2013. ‘What anthropology should learn from G.E.R. Lloyd’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 171–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhrmann, Tanya M., Vilaça, Aparecida, Sangren, Steven, Keane, Webb, Severi, Carlo, Laidlaw, James, Anne-Christine, Taylor, andLloyd, Geoffrey E. R.. 2013. Book Symposium – Being, humanity, and understanding (G. E. R. Lloyd). Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 171–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 2013. ‘Ontography: investigating the production of things, deflating ontology’. Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 444–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Kristina Marie 2014. ‘Soil science, development, and the “elusive nature” of Colombia’s Amazonian Plains’. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 19 (2): 212–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, Lambros. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1961. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 2002. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mamet, David. 1997. True and False: Heresy and Common Sense for the Actor. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Maniglier, Patrice. 2014. ‘A metaphysical turn? Bruno Latour’s “An Inquiry into Modes of Existence”’. Radical Philosophy 187: 37–44.Google Scholar
Marcoulatos, Iordanis. 2003. ‘The secret life of things: rethinking social ontology’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33 (3): 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George. 1995. ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George and Fischer, Michael M. J. (eds.). 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George and Fischer, Michael M. J.. 1993. ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Keir. 2013. The Death of the Big Men and the Rise of the Big Shots: Custom and Conflict in Eastern New Britain. Oxford: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Bill. 2005. Mutual Life, Limited. Islamic Banking, Alternative Currencies, Lateral Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by W. D. Halls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. 1992. ‘Provisional notes on the postcolony’. Africa 62 (1): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1961. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: Morrow Quill Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Quentin. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. New York: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menary, Richard (ed.). 2010. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/BradfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Birgit. 1999. Translating the Devil. Religion and Modernity among the Ewe in Ghana. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2005. ‘Materiality: an introduction’, in Miller, D. (ed.) Materiality, pp. 1–50. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2007. ‘Stone age or plastic age?’ Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, Steven. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Hirokazu. 2006. ‘Economy of dreams: hope in global capitalism and its critiques’. Cultural Anthropology 21 (2): 147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Hirokazu. 2013. Arbitraging Japan: Dreaming of Capitalism as the End of Finance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Hirokazu and Riles, Annelise. 2005. ‘Failure as an endpoint’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, pp. 320–32. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 1999. ‘Ontological politics: a word and some questions’, in Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds.), Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 74–89. Oxford and Keele: Blackwell and the Sociological Review.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Henrietta. 1988. Feminism and Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morita, Atsuro. 2013. ‘The ethnographic machine: experimenting with context and comparison in Strathernian ethnography’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (2): 214–35.Google Scholar
Morris, Rosalind C. 2007. ‘Legacies of Derrida: anthropology’. Review of Anthropology 36: 355–89.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. 2013. Hyperobjects Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mosko, Mark. 1985. Quadripartite Structures. Categories, Relations, and Homologies in Bush Mekeo culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosko, Mark. 1992. ‘Motherless sons: “divine heroes” and “partible persons” in Melanesia and Polynesia’. Man (N.S.) 27: 697–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosko, Mark. 2010. ‘Partible penitents: dividual personhood and Christian practice in Melanesia and the West’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (1): 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosko, Mark. 2015. ‘Unbecoming individuals. The partible character of the Christian person’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 361–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosko, Mark S. and Damon, Frederick H.. 2005. On the Order of Chaos. Social Anthropology and the Science of Chaos. Oxford: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutu, Andrew. 2013. Names are Thicker than Blood: Kinship and Ownership amongst the Iatmul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, Nancy D. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myhre, Knut C. 2013. ‘Introduction: cutting and connecting – “Afrinesian” perspectives on networks, relationality, and exchange’. Social Analysis 57 (3): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Morten. 2011. ‘Futures within: reversible time and house-building in Maputo, Mozambique’. Anthropological Theory 11 (4): 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Morten. 2012. ‘Interior swelling. On the expansive effects of ancestral interventions in Maputo, Mozambique’. Common Knowledge 18(3):433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Morten. 2013. ‘Analogic Asphalt: suspended value conversations among young road workers in Southern Mozambique’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Morten. 2014. ‘A wedge of time: futures in the present and presents without futures in Maputo, Mozambique’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20 (S1): 166–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Morten and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012. Concept paper ‘An Anthropological Theory of Distortion’. Available at: http://anthropology.ku.dk/research/research-projects/current-projects/distortion/documents/Distortion_Concept_Paper._January_2012.pdf (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Morten and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2015. Comedy of Things: ‘About’ and ‘Backgroumd’. Available at: http://comedyofthings.com/background/ (Accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Morten and Pedersen, Morten Axel. (eds.). Forthcoming. The Comedy of Things: An Anthropolgical Experiment. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2001. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. Edited by Williams, Bernard, translated by Josefine Nauckhoff and Adrian Del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2003. ‘Material culture after text: remembering things’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (3): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olwig, Karen F. and Hastrup, Kirsten (eds.). 1997. Siting Culture. The Shifting Anthropological Object. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry.B. 1984. ‘Theory in anthropology since the sixties’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paleček, Martin and Risjord, Mark. 2013. ‘Relativism and the ontological turn within anthropology’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandian, Anand. 2010. ‘Interior horizons: an ethical space of selfhood in South India’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 16: 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2001. ‘Totemism, animism and North Asian indigenous ontologies’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7 (3): 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2003. ‘Networking the landscape. Place, power and decision making in Northern Mongolia’, in Roebstorff, A., Bubandt, N. and Kull, K. (eds.), Imagining Nature. Practises of Cosmology and Identity, pp. 238–59. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2007. ‘Talismans of thought. Shamanic ontology and extended cognition in Northern Mongolia’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things. Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 141–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2011. Not Quite Shamans. Spirit Worlds and Political Lives in Northern Mongolia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012a. ‘Common nonsense: a review of certain recent reviews of “the ontological turn”. Anthropology of This Century, 5. Available at: http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/ (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012b. ‘The task of anthropology is to invent relations: for the motion’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (1): 59–65Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012c. ‘A day in the Cadillac: the work of hope in urban Mongolia’. Social Analysis 56 (2): 136–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2013a. ‘Islands of nature: insular objects and frozen sprits in Northern Mongolia’, in Hastrup, K. (ed.), Anthropology and Nature, pp. 96–107. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2013b. ‘The fetish of connectivity’, in Harvey, P., Casella, E. C., Evans, G., Knox, H., Mclean, C., Silva, E. B., Thoburn, N. and Woodward, K. (eds.), Objects and Materials. A Routledge Companion, pp. 197–207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2013c. ‘Taking things too seriously’. Professorial inaugural lecture, Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, 6 September 2013.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2014. ‘Shamanic spirits in transition: postsocialism as political cosmology’, in Abrahamson, A. and Holbraad, M. (eds.), Framing Cosmologies: The Anthropology of Worlds, pp. 161–84. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2017. “The politics of paradox. Kierkegaardian theology and national conservatism in Denmark” In Rapport, N. (ed.), Distortion: Social Processes beyond the Structured and the Systemic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel, Empson, Rebecca and Humphrey, Caroline (eds.). 2007. ‘Inner Asian perspectivism’. Special issue of Inner Asia 10 (2).Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel and Bunkenborg, Mikkel. 2012. ‘Roads that separate: Sino-Mongolian relations in the Inner Asian desert’. Mobilities 7 (4): 554–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel and Højer, Lars. 2008. ‘Lost in transition: fuzzy property and leaky selves in Ulaanbaatar.’ Ethnos 73: 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel and Nielsen, Morten. 2013. ‘Trans-temporal hinges reflections on a comparative ethnographic study of Chinese infrastructural projects in Mozambique and Mongolia’. Social Analysis 57 (1): 122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel and Willerslev, Rane. 2012. ‘“The soul of the soul is the body”: rethinking the soul through North Asian ethnography’. Common Knowledge 18 (3): 464–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–35. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2011. ‘Ontological politics: realism and agency in science, technology and art’. Insights 4 (9): 2–11.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2016. ‘The ontological turn: taking different worlds seriously’. Available at: https://architecture.mit.edu/sites/architecture.mit.edu/files/attachments/lecture/tokyo-rev-060815.pdf (accessed 31 August 2016)Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew and Guzik, Keith. 2008. The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society, and Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, Anthony. 2013. ‘Pocket calculator: a humdrum “obviator” in Papua New Guinea?’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (3): 510–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piette, Albert. 2012. De l’ontologie en anthropologie, Paris: Berg International.Google Scholar
Piette, Albert. 2015. ‘God and the anthropologist: the ontological turn and human-oriented anthropology’. Tsantsa 20: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina-Cabral, João de. 2014. ‘World: an anthropological examination (part 1)’. HAU: Journal of Anthropological Theory 4 (1): 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinney, Chris. 2005. ‘Things happen: or, from which moment does that object come?,’ in Miller, D. (ed.), Materiality, pp. 256–72. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher and Thomas, Nicholas (eds.). 2001. Beyond Aesthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Pitarch, Pedro. 2011. ‘The two Maya bodies: an elementary model of Tzeltal personhood’. Ethnos 77 (1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian multiculturalism. London and Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2012. ‘The will to be otherwise / the effort of endurance’. South Atlantic Quarterly 111 (3): 453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2014. ‘Geontologies of the Otherwise’. Theorizing the Contemporary. Cultural Anthropology website, www.culanth.org/fieldsights/465-geontologies-of-the-otherwise (accessed 15 February 2016).Google Scholar
Puett, Michael. 2014. ‘Ritual disjunctions: ghosts, anthropology, and philosophy’, in Das, V., Jackson, M., Kleinman, A. and Singh, B. (eds.), The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy, pp. 218–33. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. ‘The meaning of “meaning”’. Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers 7: 131–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1958. Method in Social Anthropology. Edited by Srinivas, M. N.. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1977. Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ramos, Alcida R. 2012. ‘The politics of perspectivism’. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, Roy A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, Nigel. 2007. ‘An outline for cosmopolitan study: reclaiming the human through introspection’. Current Anthropology 48 (2) 257–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, Helene. 2012. Promises of Reflexivity: Managing and Researching Inclusive Schools. PhD thesis. Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Reed, Adam. 2004. Papua New Guinea’s Last Place. Experiences of Constraint in a Postcolonial Prison. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Reed, Adam. 2007. ‘Smuk is king: the action of cigarettes in a Papua New Guinea prison’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things. Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 32–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reed, Adam. 2011. ‘Inspiring Strathern’, in Edwards, J. and Petrovic-Steger, M. (eds.), Recasting Anthropological Knowledge: Inspiration and Social Science, pp. 165–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans. 1994. ‘Experimental systems: historiality, narration, and deconstruction’. Science in Context 7 (1): 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricart, Ender. 2014. ‘Field of difference: limitations of the political in ontological anthropology’. Fieldsights – Commentary. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/524-field-of-difference-limitations-of-the-political-in-ontological-anthropology (accessed 22 April 2015).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1998. ‘Thinking creation’, in LaCocque, A. and Ricoeur, P., Thinking Biblically: Exegetical and Hermeneutical Studies, pp. 31–67. Translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 1998. ‘Infinity within the brackets’. American Ethnologist 25 (3): 378–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2001. The Network Inside Out. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rio, Knut Mikjel. 2007. The Power of Perspective. Social Ontology and Agency on Ambrym Island, Vanuatu. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2004a. Becoming Sinners. Christianity and Moral Torment in a Papua New Guinea Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2004b. ‘The globalization of pentecostal and charismatic Christianity’. Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2007. ‘Continuity thinking and the problem of Christian culture. belief, time, and the Anthropology of Christianity’. Current Anthropology 48 (1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2010. ‘Melanesia, Christianity, and cultural change: a comment on Mosko’s “Partible penitents”’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (2): 241–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2012. ‘Transcendence and the anthropology of Christianity: language, change and individualism’. Suomen Antropologi: The Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 37 (2): 5–23.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2015. ‘Dumont’s hierarchical dynamism. Christianity and individualism revisited’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel, Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Vilaça, Aparecida. 2014. ‘Evangelical conversion and the transformation of the self in Amazonia and Melanesia: Christianity and the revival of anthropological comparison’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 56 (3): 559–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruel, Malcolm. 1982. ‘Christians as believers’, in Davis, J. (ed.), Religious Organization and Religious Experience, pp. 9–31. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1974. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1999. ‘Two or three things that I know about culture’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 5 (3): 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Salmond, Amiria. 2013. ‘Transforming translations (part 1): the owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmond, Amira. 2014. ‘Transforming translations (part 2): addressing ontological alterity’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmond, Amira. Forthcoming. Uncommon things. In: Marisol de la Cadena and Mario Blaser (eds.) Dialogues for the Reconstitution of Worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sangren, Steven. 1988. ‘Rhetoric and the authority of ethnography: “postmodernism” and the social reproduction of texts’. Current Anthropology 29 (3): 405–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangren, Steven. 2007. ‘Anthropology of anthropology? Further reflections on reflexivity’, Anthropology Today 23(4): 13–16.Google Scholar
Schlecker, Markus and Hirsch, Eric. 2001. ‘Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media science and technology’. History of the Human Sciences 14 (1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, Jessica. 2015. ‘Worlds beyond critique: choking on the joke?’. Global Dialogues 10: 12–17.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Mario. 2015. ‘Critique as a paratopical joke: the political apoliticalness of anthropology’. Global Dialogues 10: 18–24.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1995. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories. Edited by Handler, Richard. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schrempp, Gregory. 1992. Magical Arrows: The Maori, Greeks, and the Folklore of the Universe. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Schrempp, Gregory. 2012. The Ancient Mythology of Modern Science: A Mythologist Looks (Seriously) at Popular Science Writing. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael W. 2005. ‘Hybridity, vacuity, and blockage: visions of chaos from anthropological theory, island Melanesia, and Central Africa’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 47 (1): 190–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2007. The Severed Snake: Matrilineages, Making Place, and a Melanesian Christianity in Southeast Solomon Islands. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2013a. ‘The anthropology of ontology (religious science?)’. Journal of the Anthropological Institute (N.S). 19 (4): 859–72.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2013b. ‘Steps to a methodological non-dualism’. Critique of Anthropology 33 (3): 303–9.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2014. ‘To be a wonder: anthropology, cosmology, and alterity’, in Abramson, A. and Holbraad, M. (eds.), The Cosmological Frame: The Anthropology of Worlds, pp. 31–54. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2015a. ‘“When people have a vision they are very disobedient”: A Solomon Islands case study for the Anthropology of Christian ontologies’, in Fuchs, M., Linkenbach-Fuchs, A., and Reinhard, W. (eds.), Individualisierung durch christliche Mission?, pp. 635–50. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael W.. 2015b. ‘Cosmogony today: counter-cosmogony, perspectivism, and the return of anti-biblical polemic’. Religion and Society: Advances in Research 6 (1): 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2006. ‘Social ontology: some basic principles’. Anthropological Theory 6 (1): 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Robert A. 1999. ‘Durkheim in Britain: the work of Radcliffe-Brown’. JASO 30 (2): 131–62.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Simon. 1994. From Physics to Anthropology – & Back Again. Prickly Pears Pamphlets Series No. 3. Cambridge: Prickly Pears Pamphlets.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sivado, Akos. 2015. ‘The shape of things to come: reflections on the ontological turn in anthropology’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skafish, Peter. 2014. ‘Introduction’, in de Castro, E. Viveiros, Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology, pp. 9–38. Translated and edited by Peter Skafish. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
Skirbekk, Gunnar. 2015. ‘Bruno Latour’s anthropology of the moderns: a reply to Maniglier’. Radical Philosophy 189: 45–47.Google Scholar
Smith, William Cantwell. 1979. Faith and Belief. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sneath, David, Holbraad, Martin and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2009. ‘Technologies of the imagination: an introduction’. Ethnos 74 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Jonathan. 1989. ‘Anthropology as a kind of writing', Man 24 (1): 145–64.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1985. On Anthropological Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1988. ‘Can there be a feminst ethnography?’ Women's Studies International Forum 11 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2003. ‘Separateness as a relation: the iconicity, univocality and creativity of Korowai mother-in-law avoidance’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9: 317–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2009. Society of Others. Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 2009. ‘Experimenting with “What Is Philosophy?”’, in Jensen, C. B. and Rödje, K. (eds.), Deleuzian Intersections: Science, Technology, Anthropology, pp. 39–56. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stépanoff, Charles. 2009. ‘Devouring perspectives: on cannibal shamans in Siberia’. Inner Asia 11: 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, George. 1984. ‘Dr. Durkheim and Mr. Brown: comparative sociology at Cambridge in 1910’ and ‘Radcliffe-Brown and British Social Anthropology’, in Stocking, G. (ed.), Functionalism Historicized. Essays on British Social Anthropology, pp. 106–91. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George. (ed.). 1986. Malinowski, Rivers, Benedict and Others: Essays on British Social Anthropology. History of Anthropology, Vol. 4. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George. 1987 . Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free Press, and London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stocking, George. 1995. After Tylor: British Social Anthropology 1888–1951. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Stoller. 1995. Spirit Possession, Power, and the Hauka in West Africa. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. ‘No nature, no culture: the Hagen case’, in MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M. (eds.), Nature, Culture and Gender, pp.174–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1987a. ‘An awkward relationship: the case of feminism in anthropology’. Signs 12 (2): 276–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1987b. ‘Out of context: the pervasive fictions of anthropology’. Current Anthropology 28 (3): 251–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1990. ‘Artefacts of history: events and the interpretation of images’, in Siikala, J. (ed.), Culture and History in the Pacific, pp. 25–44. Helsinki: Finnish Anthropological Society.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b. ‘Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a postplural world’, in Kuper, A. (ed.), Conceptualizing Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1995a. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Pamphlet no. 6.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1995b. ‘Gender: division or comparison?’, in Charles, N. and Hughes-Freeland, F. (eds.), Practising Feminism: Identity, Difference, Power, pp. 38–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. ‘Cutting the network’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 2 (3): 517–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1999. Property, Substance and Effect. Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2004. Partial Connections. Updated edition. Oxford: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2005. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2011. ‘Binary license’. Common Knowledge 17 (1): 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2012. ‘A comment on “the ontological turn” in Japanese anthropology’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (2): 402–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014a. ‘Reading relations backwards’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 20: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014b. ‘Anthropological reasoning: some threads of thought’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Alice. 2014. Biomedicine in an Unstable Place: Infrastructure and Personhood in a Papua New Guinean Hospital. London and Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Surel, Olivier. 2014. ‘Let a thousand natures bloom: a polemical trope in the “ontological turn” of anthropology’. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 2: 14–29.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Wakana. 2015. ‘The care of the cell: onomatopoeia and embodiment in a stem cell laboratory’. NatureCulture 3: 87–105.Google Scholar
Swancutt, Katherine. 2012. Fortune and the Cursed: The Sliding Scale of Time in Mongolian Divination. Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Heather Anne, Bubandt, Nils and Tsing, Anna. 2015. ‘Less than one but more than many: anthropocene as science fiction and scholarship-in-the-making’. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 6 (1): 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel. 2012. Monadology and Sociology. Edited and translated by Theo Lorenc. Prahan: re.press.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity. A Particular History of the Senses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Christopher C. 2001. Sacrifice as Terror: The Rwandan Genocide of 1994. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 2014. Michel Foucault: Key Concepts. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Charis. 1996. ‘Ontological choreography: agency through objectification in infertility clinics’. Social Studies of Science 26:575–610.Google Scholar
Nigel, Thrift. 2007. Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tresch, John. 2013. ‘Another turn after ANT: an interview with Bruno Latour’. Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 302–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna L. 2005. Friction. An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna L.. 2013. ‘More-than-human sociality: a call for critical description’, in Hastrup, K. (ed.), Anthropology and Nature, pp. 27–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna L.. 2014. ‘Strathern beyond the human: testimony of a spore’. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (2–3): 321–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna L.. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Terence. 2009. ‘The crisis of late structuralism, perspectivism and animism: rethinking culture, nature, spirit, and bodiliness’. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 7 (1): 3–42.Google Scholar
Tyler, Stephen. 1987. The Unspeakable: Discourse, Dialogue and Rhetoric in the Post-modern World. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1920. Primitive Culture. Volume 1. New York: J. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jacob von. 1934. ‘A stroll through the words and animals and men’, in Schiller, C. H. and Lashley, K. S. (eds.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept, pp. 5–80. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Uzendosky, Michael. 2012. ‘Beyond orality: textuality, territoriality, and ontology among Amazonian people’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeri, Valerio. 1995. ‘Miti cosmogonici e ordine’. Parole Chiave 7/8: 93–110.Google Scholar
Vangkilde, Kasper T. 2015. ‘Possessed by the Zeitgeist: inspiration and prophecy in the business of fashion’. Journal of Business Anthropology 4 (2): 178–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesan, Soumyha, Carrithers, Michael, Sykes, Karen, Candea, Matei and Holbraad, Martin. 2010. ‘“Ontology is just another word for culture”: motion tabled at the 2008 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory’. Critique of Anthropology 30: 152–200.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, S., Jensen, M. C. C. B., Leach, J., Pedersen, M. A., and Evans, G.. 2012. ‘The task of anthropology is to invent relations: 2011 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (1): 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verran, Helen. 2001. Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verran, Helen. 2014. ‘Anthropology as ontology is comparison as ontology’. Fieldsights – Theorizing the Contemporary. Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/468-anthropology-as-ontology-is-comparison-as-ontology (accessed 13 January 2014).Google Scholar
Vigh, Henrik E. 2006. Navigating Terrains of War: Youth and Soldiering in Guinea-Bissau. Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigh, Henrik E. and Sausdal, David Brehm. 2014. ‘From essence back to existence: anthropology beyond the ontological turn’. Anthropological Theory 14 (1): 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilaça, Aparecida. 2005. ‘Chronically unstable bodies: reflections on Amazonian corporalities’. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 11.3 (September 2005): 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilaça, Aparecida. 2011. ‘Dividuality in Amazonia: God, the Devil, and the constitution of personhood in Wari’ Christianity’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 17: 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1992. From the Enemy’s Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazon Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. (ed.). 1995. Pensando o parentesco ameríndio: estudos amerindios. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. ‘Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism’. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469–88.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2003. AND. Manchester: Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology 7.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. ‘Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation’. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2007. ‘The Crystal Forest: notes on the ontology of Amazonian spirits’. Inner Asia 9 (2): 153–72.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2009. ‘Intensive filiation and demonic alliance’, in Jensen, C. B. and Rödje, K. (eds.), Deleuzian Intersections in Science, Technology and Anthropology, pp. 219–55. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2010. ‘Claude Lévi-Strauss: fundador del postestructuralismo’, in Olavarria, M. E., Bonfiglioli, C., Millan, S. (eds.), Lévi-Strauss: un siglo de reflexion, pp. 17–42. Districto Fedreral de Mexico: Juan Pablos Editor.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2011a. ‘Zeno and the art of anthropology: of lies, beliefs, paradoxes, and other truths’. Common Knowledge 17 (1): 128–45.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2011b. The Inconstancy of the Indian Soul: The Encounter of Catholics and Cannibals in 16th Century Brazil. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere. Masterclass Series 1. Manchester: HAU Network of Ethnographic Theory.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2013. ‘The relative native’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3): 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Translated and edited by Peter Skafish. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33 (1): 2–17.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo and Fausto, Carlos. 1993. ‘La puissance et l’acte: la parenté dans les basses terres de l’Amérique du Sud’. L’Homme XXXIII (2–4): 141–70.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo and Goldman, Marcio. 2009. ‘Slow motions: comments on a few texts by Marilyn Strathern’. Cambridge Anthropology 28 (3): 23–42.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1972. Habu: The Innovation of Meaning in Daribi Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1977a. ‘Scientific and indigenous Papuan conceptualizations of the innate: a semiotic critique of the ecological perspective’, in Bayliss-Smith, T. P. and Feachern, R. G. A. (eds.), Subsistence and Survival: Rural Ecology in the Pacific, pp. 385–410. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1977b. ‘Analogic kinship: a Daribi example’. American Ethnologist 4 (4): 623–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1978. Lethal Speech: Daribi Myth As Symbolic Obviation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1981. The Invention of Culture – revised and expanded edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1984. ‘Ritual as communication: order, meaning, and secrecy in Melanesian initiation rites’. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1986a. Symbols That Stand for Themselves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1986b. Asiwinarong: Ethos, Image, and Social Power Among the Usen Barok of New Ireland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1987. ‘Figure-ground reversal among the Barok’, in Lincoln, L. (ed.), Assemblage of Spirits: Idea and Image in New Ireland, pp. 56–62. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 1991. ‘The fractal person’, in Godelier, M. and Strathern, M. (ed.), Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia, pp. 159–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2000. ‘Condensed mapping: myth and the folding of space / space and the folding of myth’, in Ramsey, A. and Weiner, J. F. (eds.), Emplaced Myth: Space, Narrative and Knowledge in Aboriginal Australia and Papua New Guinea, pp. 71–8. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2001. An Anthropology of the Subject: Holographic Worldview in New Guinea and Its Meaning and Significance for the World of Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2005. ‘Afterword: order is what happens when chaos loses its temper’, in Mosko, M. S. and Damon, F. (eds.), On the Order of Chaos: Social Anthropology and the Science of Chaos, pp. 206–47. New York and London: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2010. Coyote Anthropology. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2012a. ‘Facts force you to believe in them; perspectives encourage you to believe out of them: an introduction to Viveiros de Castro’s magisterial essay’, in Viveiros de Castro, E. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere. Master class Series 1. Manchester: HAU Network of Ethnographic Theory.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. 2012b. ‘“Luck in the double focus”: ritualized hospitality in Melanesia’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walford, Antonia. 2012. ‘Data moves: taking Amazonian climate science seriously’. Cambridge Anthropology 30 (2): 101–17.Google Scholar
Walford, Antonia. 2015. ‘Double standards: examples and exceptions in scientific meteorological practice in Brazil’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 21 (S1): 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastell, Sari. 2001. ‘Presuming scale, making diversity’. Critique of Anthropology 21 (2): 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastell, Sari. 2007. ‘The “legal” thing in Swaziland: res judicata and divine kinship’, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.), Thinking Through Things. Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 68–92. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, Matthew C. 2014. ‘Derrida, Stengers, Latour and subalternist cosmopolitics’. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (1): 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: ScribnerGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society. Edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webmoore, Tim and Witmore, Christopher. 2008. ‘Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a “social” archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeology Review, 41 (1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, James F. 1988. The Heart of the Pear Shell: The Mythological Dimension of Foi Sociality. Berkeley, CA and London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, James F. 1995. The Lost Drum: The Myth of Sexuality in Papua New Guinea and Beyond. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Sarah J. 2013. ‘Earthly powers and affective environments: an ontological politics of flood risk’. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7/8): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerslev, Rane. 2004. ‘Not animal not not-animal: hunting, imitation and empathetic knowledge among the Siberian Yukaghirs’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10: 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerslev, Rane. 2007. Soul Hunters. Hunting, Animism, and Personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Willerslev, Rane. 2011. 'Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul'. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (3): 504–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerslev, Rane and Pedersen, Morten A.. 2010. ‘Proportional holism: joking the cosmos into the right shape in Northern Asia’, in Otto, T. and Bubandt, N. (eds.), Experiments with Holism, pp. 162–78. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan R. (ed.). 1974. Rationality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1967. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Winthereik, Brit R. and Verran, Helen. 2012. ‘Stories as generalizations that intervene’. Social Science Studies 25 (1): 37–51.Google Scholar
Witmore, Christopher. 2009. ‘The realities of the past’, in B. Fortenberry & L. McAtackney (eds.), Modern Materials: Proceedings from the Contemporary and Historical Archaeology in Theory Conference, pp. 25–36. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Witmore, Christopher. In press. ‘The realities of the past: archaeology, object-orientations, pragmatology’, in Fortenberry, B. R. and McAtackney, L. (eds.), Modern Materials: Proceedings from the Contemporary and Historical Archaeology in Theory Conference 2009. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve and Lezaun, Javier. 2013. ‘The wrong bin bag: a turn to ontology in science and technology studies?’ Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Mei. 2009. Other-Worldly: Making Chinese Medicine through Transnational Frames. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×