Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:52:40.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Phonology and grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2009

Günter Rohdenburg
Affiliation:
Universität Paderborn, Germany
Julia Schlüter
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Based on the assumption that functional constraints underdetermine the precise shape a grammar can take, this contribution explores the influence of a rhythmic universal on grammatical variation in BrE and AmE. Although the historical division between the two national varieties under consideration has occurred only recently (by the standards of linguistic evolution), corpus analyses reveal significant dissimilarities in the ways the phonological universal is implemented. This provides a small-scale example of the interaction between system-internal, grammatical choices and system-external, functional conditions of language use.

At the centre of the discussion is the so-called Principle of Rhythmic Alternation, i.e. the tendency to separate stressed syllables by intervening unstressed ones. In previous work (cf. Schlüter 2002, 2003, 2005), its influence on the shaping of English grammar has been demonstrated. In the present contribution, the emphasis will be placed on dissimilarities in its implementation in the two major national varieties of English. For this purpose, two domains of grammatical variation will be focused on that have so far received little attention in the context of British–American differences and have therefore never been subjected to a thorough analysis. This concerns the choice between mono- and disyllabic past participles of the verbs light and knit and the positional alternation of the degree modifier quite in combination with the indefinite article.

Type
Chapter
Information
One Language, Two Grammars?
Differences between British and American English
, pp. 108 - 129
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×