Names and Categories for Odors: The Veridical Label

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511546389.009

4 - Names and Categories for Odors: The Veridical Label

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2009

Danièle Dubois and

Edited by

Rémi Gervais and

Danièle Dubois: Affiliation:
Laboratoire Languages, Cognitions, Pratiques, Ergonomie, CNRS, Institut National de la Langue Française, 44, rue de l'Amiral Mouchez, 75014 Paris, France
Catherine Rouby: Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, 69 366 Lyon, France
Catherine Rouby: Affiliation:
Université Lyon I
Benoist Schaal: Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Danièle Dubois: Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Rémi Gervais: Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
A. Holley: Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The research presented here is aimed at clarifying the relationships between cognitive categories and the naming of odors, our method being a close analysis of the verbal answers given to odorants presented in various experiments. This is part of a work in progress within a cognitive science research program on categorization. By definition, such a program is multidisciplinary, involving chemistry, neurophysiology, psychology, and, in this case, an emphasis on psycholinguistics and linguistics. The concerns of these latter two disciplines led us to pay special attention to the conceptualizations and wording chosen for odors. We shall focus on the verbal answers given by subjects: On the one hand, they are considered as direct and obvious, like any other outputs or responses from the cognitive system in any experimental setting, like neural or behavioral responses; on the other hand, they may be scored at the same time as “erroneous.” The questions raised by this ambiguity when scoring verbal answers in olfactory research led to examination of some theoretical issues regarding the conceptual representation of “an odor” in human memory, as compared with the descriptions of odorants in the natural sciences.

Odors and Their Names

When scoring the verbal performances of subjects in identification tasks and in diagnostic tests, words such as “orange,” “apple,” and “vanilla” are considered the “correct odor names” or the “veridical labels” (e.g., Engen, 1987; Doty, 1992). However, little consideration has been given to what, precisely, a “word” is and what it means to researchers and subjects.

Type: Chapter
Information: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition , pp. 47 - 66

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

, Berlin B (1973). Folk Systematics in Relation to Biological Classification and Nomenclature. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:259–71

, Boisson C (1997). Quelques généralités sur la dénomination des odeurs: variations et régularités linguistiques. Intellectica 24:29–49

, Clark H H & , Wilkes-Gibbs D (1986). Referring as a Collaborative Process. Cognition 22:1–39

Classen C (1993). Worlds of Senses: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge

David S (1997). Représentation sensorielles et marques de la personne: contrastes entre olfaction et audition. In: Catégorisation et cognition: de la perception au discours, ed. D Dubois, pp. 211–42. Paris: Kimé

, David S (2000). Certitudes et incertitudes dans les domaines olfactif, gustatif et auditif. Cahiers du LCPE (Langages, cognitions, pratiques, ergonomie) 4:77–107

, David S, , Dubois D, , Rouby C, & , Schaal B (1997). L'expression des odeurs en français: analyse lexicale et représentation cognitive. Intellectica 24:51–83

, Doty R L (1992). Diagnostic Tests and Assessment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 7:47–65

, Doty R L, , Applebaum S, , Zusho H, & , Settle G (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross Cultural Analysis. Neuropsychologia 23:667–72

, Doty R L, , Marcus A, & , Lee W (1996). Development of the 12-Item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–6

Dubois D (1991). Les catégories sémantiques naturelles: prototype et typicalité. In: Sémantique et cognition: Catégories, concepts et typicalité. ed. D Dubois, pp. 15–27. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.

Dubois D (1996). Matériels et consignes: un type de questionnaire social dans la recherche experimentale en psycholinguistique. In: Le questionnement social, ed. J Richard-Zappella, pp. 89–98. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale (numéro spécial)

, Dubois D (2000). Categories as Acts of Meaning: The Case of Categories in Olfaction and Audition. Cognitive Science Quartely 1:35–68

Dubois D http://www.iig.unifreiburg.de/cognition/csq

, Dubois D & , Resche-Rigon P (1995). De la “naturalité” des catégories sémantiques: des catégories d'objets naturels aux catégories lexicales. Intellectica 20:217–45

Dubois D, Resche-Rigon P, & Tenin A (1997). Des couleurs et des formes: catégories perceptives ou constructions cognitives. In: Catégorisation et cognition, ed. D Dubois, pp. 7–40. Paris: Kimé

, Dubois D & , Rouby C (1997). Olfaction et cognition: du linguistique au neuronal. Intellectica 24:9–20

, Dubois D, , Rouby C, & , Sicard G (1997). Catégories sémantiques et sensorialités: de l'espace visuel à l'espace olfactif. Enfance 1:141–51

Eco U (1988). Le signe. Paris: Labor

Eco U (1997). Kant e l'ornotorinco. Milan: Bompiani. (French translation, 1999, Kant et l'ornithorynque. Paris: Grasset.)

, Engen T (1987). Remembering Odors and Their Names. American Scientist 75:497–503

, Engen T & , Engen E (1997). Relationship between Development of Odor Perception and Language. Enfance 1:125–40

Foley W A (1997). Anthopological Linguistics. London: Blackwell

Gentner D (1982). Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning. In: Language Development: Language, Thought, and Culture, ed. S Kuczaj, pp. 301–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

, Grossen M (1989). Le contrat implicite entre l'expérimentateur et l'enfant en situation de test. Revue Suisse de Psychologie 48:179–89

, Hudson R (1999). From Molecule to Mind: The Role of Experience in Shaping Olfactory Function. Journal of Comparative Physiology 185:297–304

, Imai M & , Gentner D (1993). What We Think, What We Mean, and How We Say It. Chicago Linguistic Society 29:171–86

Lakoff G (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press

Lucy J (1992). Language Diversity and Thought. Cambridge University Press

Markman E (1989). Categorization and Naming in Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Mondada L (1997). Processus de catégorisation et construction discursive des catégories. In: Catégorisation et cognition, ed. D Dubois, pp. 291–313. Paris: Kimé

, Mondada L & , Dubois D (1995). Construction des objets de discours et catégorisation: une approche des processus de référenciation. TRANEL 23:273–302

Neisser U (1987). Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge University Press

Ogden C K & Richards I A (1923). The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Rastier F (1991). Sémantique et recherches cognitives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Rosch E (1978). Principles of Categorization. In: Categorization and Cognition, ed. E Rosch & B Lloyd, pp. 28–47. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

, Rouby C, , Chevalier G, , Gautier B, & , Dubois D (1997). Connaissance et reconnaissance d'une série olfactive chez l'enfant préscolaire. Enfance 1:152–71

, Rouby C & , Dubois D (1995). Odor Discrimination, Recognition and Semantic Categorization. Chemical Senses 20:78–9

Rouby C & Sicard G (1997). Des catégories d'odeurs? In: Catégorisation et cognition, ed. D Dubois, pp. 59–81. Paris: Kimé

Taylor J (1995). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press

Tenin A (1991). Catégorisation et cognition: 10 ans aprés. In: Sémantique et cognition: Catégories, concepts et typicalité, ed. D Dubois, pp. 7–25. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.

Varela F J, Thompson E, & Rosch E (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Waxman S (1999). The Dubbing Ceremony Revisited: Objects Naming and Categorization in Infancy and Early Childhood. In: Folkbiology, ed. D Medin & S Atran, pp. 233–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

, Wierzbicka A (1992). The Meaning of Color Terms: Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 1:99–150