Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:05:16.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

Robert Audi
Robert Audi
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Of Moral Conduct
A Theory of Obligation, Reasons, and Value
 , pp. 292 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, Karl (2020). “The Fate of Dignity: How Words Matter.” In Kato, Y. and Schönrich, G., eds., Kant’s Concept of Dignity, Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte 209. Berlin: de Gruyter, 263–284.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (1993). Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33, 124, 1–19.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2019). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Audi, Paul (2012). “Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation.” Journal of Philosophy 109, 12, 685–711.Google Scholar
Audi, Paul (2013). “How to Rule Out Disjunctive Properties.” Noûs 47, 4, 748–766.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1973). “Intending.” Journal of Philosophy 70, 13, 387–403.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1974). “Moral Responsibility, Freedom, and Compulsion.” American Philosophical Quarterly 11, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1986). “Acting for Reasons.” Philosophical Review 95, 4, 511–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert (1988). “The Axiology of Moral Experience.” Journal of Ethics 2, 4, 355–375.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1993a). Action, Intention, and Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1993b). “Ethical Naturalism and the Explanatory Power of Moral Concepts.” In Wagner, Steven and Warner, Richard, eds. Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 95–115.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1993c). The Structure of Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1996). “Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics.” In Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter and Timmons, Mark, eds., Moral Knowledge? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–136.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1997). Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1999). “Self-Evidence.” Philosophical Perspectives 13, 205–228.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2001a). “A Kantian Intuitionism.” Mind 110, 439, 601–635.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2001b). The Architecture of Reason: The Substance and Structure of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2002). “Prospects for a Naturalization of Practical Reason: Humean Instrumentalism and the Normative Authority of Desire.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10, 3, 235–263.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2003). “Intrinsic Value and Reasons for Action.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 41, Supplement, 30–56.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2004). The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2005). “Wrongs Within Rights.” Philosophical Issues 15, 121–139.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2006a). “Ethical Generality and Moral Judgment.” In Dreier, James, ed., Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 285–304.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2006b). Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2010a). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2010b). “Practical Reason and the Status of Moral Obligation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, Supplementary vol. 33, 197–229.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2012). “Kantian Intuitionism as a Framework for the Justification of Moral Judgments.” In Timmons, Mark, ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 2, 128–151.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2013a). “Knowledge, Justification, and Normativity.” Res Philosophica 90, 2, 125–145.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2013b). Moral Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2013c). “The Practical Authority of Normative Beliefs: Toward an Integrated Theory of Practical Rationality.” Organon F 20, 4, 527–545.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2015a). “Intuition and Its Place in Ethics.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1, 1, 57–77.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2015b). “On Mary Glover’s ‘Obligation and Value’.” Ethics 125, 2, 525–529.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2016). Means, Ends, and Persons: The Meaning and Psychological Dimensions of Kant’s Humanity Formula. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2017a). “On Intellectualism in the Theory of Action.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3, 3, 284–300.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2017b). “Role Modeling and Reasons: Developmental and Normative Grounds of Moral Virtues.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 14, 6, 646–648.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2018a). “Doxasticism: Belief and the Information-Responsiveness of Mind.” Episteme 17, 4, 542–562. DOI: 10.1017/epi.2018.53Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2018b). “Methodological Reflections on Kant’s Ethical Theory.” Synthese 198, Supplement 13, 3155–3179. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-01977-xGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert (2020a). Seeing, Knowing, and Doing: A Perceptualist Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2020b). “Toward an Epistemology of Moral Principles.” Res Philosophica 97, 1, 69–92.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2021). “Are Reasons Normatively Basic?” Noûs. DOI:10.1111/nous 12377Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2022). “The Phenomenology of Moral Intuition.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25, 53–69.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (forthcoming). “Normative Priority, Fittingness, and Grounds of Normativity.” In Copp, David and Rosati, Connie, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Metaethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Anna, and Cowan, Robert, eds. (2018). Evaluative Perception. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berker, Selim (2013). “The Rejection of Epistemic Consequentialism.” Philosophical Issues 23, 1, 363–387.Google Scholar
Birondo, Noell, and Braun, Stewart, eds. (2017). Virtue’s Reasons: New Essays on Virtue, Character, and Reasons. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard (1988). “How To Be a Moral Realist.” In Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, ed., Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 181–228.Google Scholar
Bradford, Gwen (2015). Achievement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert (1998). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard, and Kim, Jaegwon (1963). “Wants as Explanations of Actions.” Journal of Philosophy 60, 15, 425–435.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael (2018). Planning, Time, and Self-Governance: Essays in Practical Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. (1989). Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler (2010). Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Sarah, and Theunissen, Nandi, eds. (2023). Rethinking the Value of Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butchvarov, Panayot (1989). Skepticism in Ethics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ruth (2013). “Commitments, Reasons, and the Will.” In Shafer-Landau, Russ, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74–113.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. (1986). Brentano and Intrinsic Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Rebecca (2014). “Reid on Moral Sense.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41, Supplementary vol. 1, 80–101.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger (2005). “Value, Reasons, and the Structure of Justification: How to Avoid Passing the Buck.” Analysis 65, 1, 80–85.Google Scholar
Crisp, (2006). Reasons and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, (2015a). “A Third Method of Ethics?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90, 2, 257–273.Google Scholar
Crisp, (2015b). The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cullity, Garrett (2017). “Moral Virtues and Responsiveness for Reasons.” In Birondo, Noell and Braun, Stewart, eds., Virtue’s Reasons: New Essays on Virtue, Character, and Reasons. London and New York: Routledge, 11–31.Google Scholar
Cullity, (2018). Concern, Respect, and Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cullity, (2023). “Reasons and Fit.” In Chris Howard and R.A. Rowland, eds., Fittingness: Essays in the Philosophy of Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–175.Google Scholar
Curren, Randall, and Ryan, Richard M. (2020). “Moral Self-Determination: The Nature, Existence, and Formation of Moral Motivation.” Journal of Moral Education. DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2020.1793744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (1993). Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen E. (in preparation). “Normativity in Contemporary (and the History of) Ethics.”Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1963). “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60, 23, 685–700.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1971/1980). “Agency.” In Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43–62.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1967/1980). “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” In Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–148.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreier, Jamie (2011). “In Defense of Consequentializing.” In Timmons, Mark, ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–119.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred (2000). “Basic Intrinsic Value.” Philosophical Studies 99, 3, 319–346.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred (2019). “Two Visions of Welfare.” Journal of Ethics 23, 2, 99–118.Google Scholar
Fischer, John (2011). “Frankfurt-Type Examples and Semicompatibilism: New Work.” In Kane, Robert H., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 243–265.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William (2012). “Intention, Permissibility, and Double Effect.” In Timmons, Mark, ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 2, 97–127.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William (2022). Ethical Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Först, Rainer (2012). The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Först, Rainer (forthcoming). “Justice; Procedural and Substantive.” In Bellamy, Richard and King, Jeff, eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard (2004). Common Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard (2007). “Two Conceptions of Morality.” In Mark Timmons, John Greco, and Alfred R. Mele, , eds., Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Joshua (2004). Brute Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl (1990). On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glover, Mary (1938). “Obligation and Value.” Ethics 49, 1, 68–80.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. (1970). A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goldman, (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan (2001). “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.” Psychological Review 108, 4, 814–834.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2000). Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terry, and Mark, Timmons (2022). “Expressing Gratitude as What’s Morally Expected: A Phenomenological Approach.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25, 1, 139–155.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1777/1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (2001). Virtue, Vice, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isserow, Jessica (2020). “Moral Worth: Having It Both Ways.” Journal of Philosophy 117, 10, 529–556.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly (1994). “Me and My Life.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94, 309–324.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1785/1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, (1788/1996). Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2008). The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer (2021). The Epistemology of Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemos, Noah (1994). Intrinsic Value: Concept and Warrant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lewis, (1955). The Ground and Nature of the Right. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, Clayton (2018). “Being More Realistic About Reasons: On Rationality and Reasons Perspectivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12518Google Scholar
Lord, Errol (2018). The Importance of Being Rational. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luco, Andres (2019). “How Moral Facts Cause Moral Progress.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5, 4, 429–448.Google Scholar
Maguire, Barry (2018). “There Are No Reasons for Affective Attitudes.” Mind 127, 507, 779–805.Google Scholar
McGrath, Sarah (2019). Moral Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press..Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh (1998). The Works of Agency. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1982). “Adverbs and Logical Form: A Linguistically Realistic Theory.” Language 58, 1, 144–184.Google Scholar
McGrath, Sarah (2019). Moral Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R., ed. (1997). The Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. London: J. W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Mill, (1861/2001). Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, (1912/1965). Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Samuel (2020). Vigilance: Self-Control for Planners (doctoral dissertation). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana Kay (2011). Making Sense of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Luis R. G. (2016). “Rossian Totalism About Intrinsic Value.” Philosophical Studies 173, 8, 2069–2086.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (2011). On What Matters, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence (1970). “Some Problems Concerning the Logic of Grammatical Modifiers.” Synthese 21, 320–334.Google Scholar
Phillips, David K. (2019). Rossian Ethics: W. D. Ross and Contemporary Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Portmore, Douglas (2011). Commonsense Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (1787/1974). A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals. London. T. Cadell; and (in modern orthography), in D. D. Raphael (1974).Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1949). Moral Obligation: Essays and Lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren S. (1989). “Action, Intention, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 4, 334–351.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D., ed. (1974). A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter (2014). “The Affective Dog and Its Rational Tail: Intuition and Attunement.” Ethics 124, 4, 813–859.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1863/1983). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Reprinted in Beanblossom, Ronald and Lehrer, Keith, eds., Thomas Reid: Inquiry and Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, (1939). Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, (1954). Kant’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowland, Richard (2016). “In Defense of Good Simpliciter.” Philosophical Studies 173, 5, 1371–1391.Google Scholar
Russell, Bruce (1977). “On the Relative Strictness of Negative and Positive Duties.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 2, 87–97.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1907). The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2006a). “Moral Intuitionism Meets Empirical Psychology.” In Terry Horgan, and Mark Timmons, , eds., Metaethics after Moore. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 339–365.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2006b), Moral Skepticisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skelton, Anthony (forthcoming). Sidgwick’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smithies, Declan (2019). The Epistemic Role of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, David (1993). “Consequences of Consequentialism.” Mind 102, 405, 101–122.Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip (2000). Kant, Duty and Moral Worth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip (2011). “Recalcitrant Pluralism.” Ratio 24, 4, 364–383.Google Scholar
Stroud, Sarah (2017). “Lying as Infidelity: A Quasi-Rossian Account.” In Mark Timmons, ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 7, 79–97.Google Scholar
Stuchlik, Joshua (2021). Intention and Wrongdoing: In Defense of Double Effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas (1985). “Moral Explanations.” In Copp, David and Zimmerman, David, eds., Morality, Reason, and Truth. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 49–78.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, (2006). “Moral Explanations Defended.” In Dreier, James, ed., Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. London: Routledge, 241–262.Google Scholar
Swanton, Christine (2001). “A Virtue Ethical Account of Right Action.” Ethics 112, 1, 32–52.Google Scholar
Swanton, (2003). Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Theunissen, L. Nandi (2020). The Value of Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1973). “Rights and Deaths.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, 2, 146–159.Google Scholar
Thomson, (1990). The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, (1997). “The Right and the Good.” Journal of Philosophy 94, 6, 273–298.Google Scholar
Thomson, (2008). Normativity. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark (2021). Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark, Greco, John, and Mele, Alfred R. (2007). Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo (1995). The Importance of Us. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963). Norm and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Steven, and Warner, Richard, eds. (1993). Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph (2007). Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen (1992). “Mental Causation.” Philosophical Review 101, 2, 245–280.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2017). Exemplarist Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Michael (2019). “Solidarity, Fate-Sharing, and Community.” Philosophical Imprints 19, 46, 1–13.Google Scholar
Zhong, Lei (2019). “The Hard Problem for Soft Moral Realism.” Journal of Philosophy 116, 10, 555–576.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Robert Audi, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Of Moral Conduct
  • Online publication: 08 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009266987.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Robert Audi, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Of Moral Conduct
  • Online publication: 08 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009266987.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Robert Audi, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Of Moral Conduct
  • Online publication: 08 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009266987.020
Available formats
×