Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:00:44.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Using Classroom Observation as a Research and Formative Evaluation Tool in Educational Reform: The School Observation Measure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Steven M. Ross
Affiliation:
Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Lana J. Smith
Affiliation:
Instruction and Curriculum Leadership, University of Memphis
Marty Alberg
Affiliation:
Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Deborah Lowther
Affiliation:
College of Education, University of Memphis
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

Through the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration (CSRD) program (Public Law 105–78; see Doherty, 2000) and Title I School-Wide programs (Natriello & McDill, 1999), there is currently considerable impetus for reforming education using whole-school change models. Implementing comprehensive school reform (CSR) programs requires tremendous commitment and effort by school districts and their individual schools. As the literature on school reform indicates, it also takes time (Bodilly, 1996). What the public, media, and school boards sometimes fail to understand is that programs by themselves are not what improve student learning. Rather, the critical factor is the positive changes that the reforms engender in school climate, resources, and, most critically, the quality of classroom teaching and learning. But whether achievement effects are evidenced in a relatively short period, as occurred after 2 years in Memphis (Ross et al., 2001) or, more typically, after 5 or more years (Herman & Stringfield, 1995; Levin, 1993), key stakeholders (e.g., the public and school boards) want fairly immediate information about what is happening in the schools to justify the reform effort. At the same time, teachers and administrators within schools need formative evaluation data to know whether their efforts are producing the tangible changes desired.

These considerations prompted our development of the School Observation Measure (SOM; Ross, Smith, & Alberg, 1999), the instrument to be described in this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity
, pp. 144 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodilly, S. J. (1996). Lessons from New American Schools Development Corporation's demonstration phase. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp
Dalton, S. S. (1998). Pedagogy matters: Standards for effective teaching practice;(Research Report No. 4). Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education,; Diversity & Excellence, University of California
Doherty, K. M. (2000). Early implementation of the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration (CSRD) program (Summary Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Under Secretary, Planning and Evaluation Service, Elementary and Secondary Division
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1987). Looking in classrooms (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row
Herman, R. (1999). An educators' guide to schoolwide reform. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service
Herman, R., & Stringfield, S. (1995). The promising programs for educating disadvantaged students: Evidence of impact. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
Levin, H. (1993). Learning from accelerated schools. Unpublished paper, Stanford University
Lewis, E. M., Ross, S. M., & Alberg, M. (1999). School Observation Measure:;Reliability analysis. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Lowther, D. L., & Ross, S. M. (1999). Survey of computer use. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Lowther, D. L., Smith, L. J., Ross, S. M., & Alberg, M. J. (2000). SERVE Intensive research study of comprehensive school reform implementation for the southeast region (Summary Report Year 1). Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1999). Title I: From funding mechanism to educational reform. In G. Orfield & E. H. DeBray (Eds.), Hard work for good schools: Facts not fads in Title I reform (pp. 31–45). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University
Ross, S. M., Alberg, M., & Wang, L. W. (1998). The impacts of alternative school restructuring designs on at-risk learners: A longitudinal study (Progress Report to U.S. Department of Education of At-Risk Students). Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Ross, S. M., Lowther, D. L., & Plants, R. T. (2000a). Challenge grant evaluation: Final report. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Ross, S. M., Lowther, D. L., & Plants, R. T. (2000b). The impact of the Co-nect design on classroom instruction and school climate in five Memphis schools. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Ross, S. M., Lowther, D. L., Plants, R. T., & Morrison, G. R. (2000). Final evaluation of the Anytime, Anywhere Learning Laptop program. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Ross, S. M., Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., Stringfield, S., Wang, L. W., & Alberg, M.(2001). Two- and three-year achievement results from the Memphis restructuring initiative. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., & Alberg, M. (1999). The School Observation Measure. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis
Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lohr, L. L., & McNelis, M. J.(1994). Math and reading instruction in tracked first-grade classes. The Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringfield, S., Datnow, A., & Ross, S. (1998). Scaling up school restructuring in multicultural, multilingual contexts: Early observations from Sunland County;(Research Report No. 2). Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education,; Diversity & Excellence, University of California
Stringfield, S. C., Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. J. (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×