Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:42:31.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Primary and secondary objecthood and DOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

Mary Dalrymple
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Irina Nikolaeva
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we discuss languages where marked (topical) objects are grammatically distinguished from unmarked (nontopical) objects: marked and unmarked objects have different syntactic behaviour, with marked objects exhibiting more properties of core grammatical functions than unmarked objects. We concentrate on marking patterns with monotransitive verbs in this chapter; Chapter 9 discusses marking and alignment patterns for multivalent verbs, with particular attention to languages with ditransitive constructions.

Grammatical marking and grammatical function

There are two basic patterns of interaction between the grammatical marking of nonsubject topics (DOM) and grammatical objecthood. In languages of the first type, a difference in object marking does not correlate with a difference in grammatical function. Such patterns are not surprising in the context of traditional theories of argument mapping, discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.1.2, which define possible relations between grammatical functions and semantic roles as they are represented at argument structure. On this view, we would expect marked and unmarked objects which correspond to the same semantic role to be mapped to the same grammatical function, and there is no expectation that information-structure role could affect argument mapping.

The languages discussed in Chapter 7 are of this type. In these languages, DOM is defined in terms of information-structure role, sometimes in combination with semantics, and not grammatical function. Grammatically marked and unmarked objects do not display behavioural syntactic differences: grammatical marking correlates with information structure differences — topical vs. nontopical arguments — and does not reflect a difference in grammatical function.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×