Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T01:16:12.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Creativity in Mathematics Teaching: A Chinese Perspective (An Update)

from PART II - VOICES FROM THE RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

By
Weihua Niu  and
Zheng Zhou
Edited by
Ronald A. Beghetto  and
James C. Kaufman
Weihua Niu
Affiliation:
Pace University
Zheng Zhou
Affiliation:
St. John's University
Ronald A. Beghetto
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In a recent BBC documentary, five teachers from China were invited to create a “Chinese school” within a British public school (Bagnall, Quaglieni & Rumney, 2015). In four weeks, a group of 50 ninth graders fully experienced the “Chinese way of learning,” which include a large classroom setting with 50 students of mixed abilities, longer school hours (12 hours per day), a descriptive teaching style featured with lectures from the teachers and note-taking from the students, and grueling learning materials and homework. By the end of the four-week experiment, they then competed with the rest of students of their age group from the same school to test the results of their learning. Despite constant rebellion from the students and chaotic classroom at least in the first two and half weeks, students from the “Chinese school” outperformed their counterparts from the “British school” in mathematics and sciences by 10%.

The results shocked both the school and the Chinese teachers, as they all felt the Chinese classroom would not fit to the British students. Before the experiment, the school headmaster, Neil Strowger, visited public schools in Shanghai and made comments to the 2012 Programme for International Students Assessment (PISA) results that put Chinese students from Shanghai on the top of test in mathematics and sciences among 65 countries and economies.

It is, however, abundantly clear to me that Chinese parents, culture and values are the real reasons that Shanghai Province tops the oft-cited Pisa tables rather than superior teaching practice. No educational approach or policy is going to turn back the British cultural clock to the 1950s. Nor should it seek to.(BBC News Magacine, August 4, 2015)

Mr. Strowger's view probably represents most Western observers’ perspective regarding cross-national differences in academic achievement. The results from the experiment, however, challenge the view. There ought be something valuable about the Chinese way of teaching, or the way of teaching was in the West few decades ago, which is worthwhile to examine further. The documentary sparked a new round of global interest from both the general public and educational professionals to reflect their own educational systems. What have we done well and what can we learn from others?

Type
Chapter
Information
Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom , pp. 86 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 15–23.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1997a). Creative teachers, creative students. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon A Viacom Company.
Baer, J. (1997b). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25–31.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, S., Quaglieni, G., & Rumney, B. (2015). Are our kids tough enough? Chinese school. London: BBC2.
BBC News Magazine (2015, August 4). Would Chinese-style education work on British kids? Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33735517.
Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2007). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL, April 9–13.
Cavanagh, S. (2007). Asian equation. Education Week, 26, 22–26.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J. Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J. Dong, Q., & Xie, Q. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89–110.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J. Himsel, A., Greenberger, E. Dong, Q., & Xie, Q. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.Google Scholar
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2001). Large classes in China: “Good” teachers and interaction. In Watkins, D. A. & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese Learners: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives (pp. 115–134). Hong Kong and Victoria, Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and The Australian Council for the Educational Research.
Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 652–663.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., & Pretz, J. (1998). Can the promise of reward increase creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 702–714.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153–1166.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.Google Scholar
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2004). How haven Chinese students performed in mathematics? A perspective from large-scale international mathematics comparisons. In Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insider. Series on Mathematics Education, Vol. 1 (pp. 3–26). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hennessey, B. A. (2001). The social psychology of creativity: Effects of evaluation on intrinsic motivation and creativity of performance. In Harkins, S. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the effects of evaluation on performance: Toward an integration (pp. 47–75). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Horelik, I. K. (2007). Rewards and creativity: Building a bridge between two theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pace University, New York.
Lao, D. C. (1983). Confucius: The Analects. London: England Penguin Putnam.
Lin, C. (1992). Xuexi yu fazhan[Learning and developing]. Beijing: Beijing Education Publisher.
Lopez-Real, F., Mok, A. C. I., Leung, K. S. F., & Marton, F. (2004). Identifying a patter of teaching: An analysis of a Shanghai Teacher's Lessons. In Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insider. Series on Mathematics Education, Vol. 1 (pp. 382–410). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior. Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
Ma, L.-P. (1999). Knowing and teaching mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Niu, W. (2012). Confucian ideology and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 274–284.Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: A comparison between effects of an indicative instruction “to be creative” and a more elaborate heruistic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The east and the west. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influence on students' creativity. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103–114.Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, (2006). The philosophical roots of western and eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 1001–1021.Google Scholar
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know: Key results from PISA 2012. www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
O'Hara, L. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000–2001). It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students' thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationship? Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
Paine, L. W. (1990). The teachers as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49–81.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J., & Xin, T. (1998). Luen Jiaoshi de jiankong nenli [On teachers’ teaching- regulated ability]. Keti Yianjiou Tongxun Zhuan Kang, 38–46.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Lummis, M., Stigler, J. W., Liu, F., & Fang, G. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development, 61, 1053–1066.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Child Development, 58, 1272–1285.Google Scholar
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Sun, Y., Zheng, X., & Kang, L. (1999/2001). Twenty discoveries of public school students’ learning and development [Electronic version]. China Education and Research Network, 2001–05–15. www.edu.cn/20010827/208598.shtml.
Tan, O. S., & Mcinerney, D. M. (Eds.). (2008). What the West can learn from the East: Asian perspectives on the psychology of learning and motivation. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighth-grade mathematics teaching and leanring (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Victoria, Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and The Australian Council for the Educational Research.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong and Victoria, Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and The Australian Council for the Educational Research.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In Calderhead, J. (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Xin, T., Shen, J.-L., & Lin, C.-D. (2000). Renwu zhixiangxin ganyu shoduan duai xiaoshijiaxue jiankong nenli de jinxian [The effect of task-oriented intervention on teachers’ teaching regulated ability]. Xinli Kexue, 23(2), 129–132.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2007). Xinli Zhisheng – Yiwei Xinlixuejia de Jiaoyu Faxian [Achieving psychological success: The educational discovery of a psychologist]. Beijing: Sinopec Press.
Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 438–457.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×