Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:43:57.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2024

Edited by
James I. Porter
James I. Porter
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Nietzsche and Literary Studies , pp. 275 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund. 1993. Three Studies on Hegel [1943]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Allison, David B. 1993. “Nietzsche’s Identity.” In The Fate of the New Nietzsche, ed. Ansell-Pearson., Keith Aldershot: Avebury. 15–42.Google Scholar
Amery, Jean. 1980. At the Mind’s Limit, trans. Sydney Rosenfeld and Stella Rosenfeld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Anon, . 1900. “Nécrologie. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900).” Revue de métaphysique et de morale vol. 8, September 1900, supplement 1, p. 13.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith. 2021. “How to Make Sense of Nietzsche As a Sceptic.” In Nietzsche on Making Sense of Nietzsche, ed. Beland Martine, Dana, Denat, Céline, Piazzesi, Chiara, and Wotling, Patrick. Reims: Editions et presses de l’université de Reims. 71–93.Google Scholar
Appel, Sabine. 1995. Naivität und Lebenskunst: Die Idee der Synthese von Leben und Geist in Thomas Manns Hochstapler-Memoiren. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1971. The Life of the Mind. 2 vols. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2007. “Great Friend of Reality: Adalbert Stifter.” In Reflections on Literature and Culture, ed. Young-Ah Gottlieb, Susannah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 1992. “Descartes and the Tree of Knowledge.” Synthese vol. 92, no. 1: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1882. On the Parts of the Animals, trans. William Ogle. London: Kegan Paul & Trench.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2016. De anima, trans. Christopher Shields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Michel. 1900. “Frédéric Nietzsche.” La Revue blanche vol. 23, September 15: 113–121.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Michel. 1902. “André Gide: L’immoraliste.” La Revue blanche vol. 29, November 15: 470–474.Google Scholar
Aschheim, Steven. 1994. The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany 1890–1990. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Babich, Babette E. 2006. “The Genealogy of Morals and Right Reading: On the Nietzschean Aphorism and the Art of Polemic.” In Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays, ed. Acampora, Christa Davis. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield. 177–190.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles. 2010. “Nietzsche’s Madman Parable: A Cynical Reading.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly vol. 84, no. 2: 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barish, Jonas A. 1966. “The Antitheatrical Prejudice.” Critical Quarterly vol. 8, no. 4: 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1983. “Aphorism and Argument.” In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, Kevin. La Salle, IL: Hegeler Institute. 91–107.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. 2009. Soul of the Age: The Life, Mind and World of William Shakespeare. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Baumbach, Manuel, ed. 2022. Cento-Texts in the Making: Aesthetics and Poetics of Cento-Techniques from Homer to Zong! Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst. 1996. “Nietzsche in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Magnus, Bernd and Marie Higgins, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belaval, Yvon. 1973. “Le siècle des Lumières.” In Histoire de la philosophie. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar
Benne, Christian. 2015. Nietzsche und die historisch-kritische Philologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benne, Christian, and Zittel, Claus, eds. 2017. Nietzsche und die Lyrik: Ein Kompendium. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, Jacob. 1850. “Heraklitische Studien.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 7: 90–116 (also in Jacob Bernays, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. Hermann Usener, Berlin 1885, vol. 2, 37–64).Google Scholar
Berry, Jessica N. 2010. Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Thomas. 2009. The Sacred Universe: Earth, Spirituality and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bertram, Ernst. 1907. Studien zu Adalbert Stifters Novellentechnik. Dortmund: Fr. Wilh. Ruhfus.Google Scholar
Bertram, Ernst. 2009. Nietzsche: Attempt at a Mythology, trans. Robert E. Norton. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen. 2018. None Like Us: Blackness, Belonging, Aesthetic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackhall, Eric A. 1948. Adalbert Stifter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. 1949. La part du Feu. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. [1969] 1993. The Infinite Conversation, trans. Susan Hanon. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 82. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Peter André. 2002. “Gide, disciple de Nietzsche, face au nihilisme européen.” In André Gide et la tentation de la modernité, ed. Kopp, Robert and Schnyder, Peter, Paris: Gallimard. 130–153.Google Scholar
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold. 1982. Agon: Towards a Theory of Revisionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. 2020. Take Arms against the Sea of Troubles. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blum, Léon. 1962. “A Theoretical Outline of ‘Beylism.’” In Stendhal: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Brombert., Victor Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 101–114.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques. 2006. “Défendre la vérité désarmée.” Interview, Nouveaux regards. http://pmsimonin.fr/lexique/2008/laicite/bouveresse2.htm.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques. 2016. Nietzsche contre Foucault: Sur la vérité, la connaissance et le pouvoir. Marseille: Agone.Google Scholar
Bouvier, David, and Dasen, Véronique, eds. 2020. Héraclite: Le temps est un enfant qui joue, Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Božovič, Miran. 2018. “Diderot on Nature and Pantomime.” European Legacy vol. 23, no. 6: 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branham, R. Bracht. 1996. “Defacing the Currency: Diogenes’ Rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism.” In The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, ed. Branham, Robert Bracht and Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile. Berkeley: University of California Press. 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branham, R. Bracht. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Cynicism: Uppercase or Lowercase?” In Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition, ed. Bishop, Paul. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Dieter. 1999. “Die Spannung von Nähe und Ferne in Nietzsches Auseinandersetzung mit Heraklit und Platon.” In “Jedes Wort ist ein Vorurteil”: Philologie und Philosophie in Nietzsches Denken, ed. Riedel, Manfred. Cologne: Bölhau. 191–206.Google Scholar
Bruford, Walter H. 1975. The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: “Bildung” from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1960. Institutes of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1, ed. McNeill, John T., trans. Ford Lewis Battles. Louisville, KY: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Came, Daniel. 2013. “The Themes of Affirmation and Illusion in The Birth of Tragedy and Beyond.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 209–225.Google Scholar
Carson, Rachel. 2022. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 2020. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms [Philosophie der symbolischen Formen]. Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1923], Vol. 1, trans. Steve G. Lofts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 2005. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie. 1991. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie. 1997. “From the Nietzsche Archive: Concerning the Aphorism Explicated in ‘Genealogy’ III.” Journal of the History of Philosophy vol. 35, no. 4 (October): 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie, and Dudrick, David. 2012. The Soul of Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie, and Dudrick, David. 2013. “Beyond Good and Evil.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Justin. 2020. “Critique This.” Overland, no. 238: 15–19.Google Scholar
Coccia, Emmanuele. 2018. The Life of Plants: A Metaphysics of Mixture. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Colin, René-Pierre. 1979. Schopenhauer en France. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. 1989. Proust entre deux siècles. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1965. Nietzsche As Philosopher. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Darlu, Alphonse. 1899. “Classification des idées morales du temps présent.” Revue bleue vol. 11, no. 10 (March 11): 289–296.Google Scholar
Deacy, Susan. 2008. Athena. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Caro, Adrian. 2004. Grounding the Nietzsche Rhetoric of Earth. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and Philosophy, trans. Hugh Tomlinson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1997. Essays Critical and Clinical, trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1971. “La mythologie blanche: la métaphore dans le texte philosophique.” Poetique vol. 5: 1–52.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Glas. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles, trans. Barbara Harlow. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Otobiographies: L’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1985. The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. The Gift of Death, trans. David Wills. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2007. “Introduction.” In Selected Writings, ed. Kofman, Sarah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2019. La vie la mort (Séminaire 1975/1976). Paris: Éditions du Seuil (Life/Death, trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1973–6. Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 2006. A Discourse on the Method, trans. Ian Maclean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1800. Œuvres, Vol. 14, ed. Naigeon, Jacques-André. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1966. Rameau’s Nephew and D’Alembert’s Dream, trans. Leonard Tancock. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann. 1901 (19092). Herakleitos von Ephesos, Griechisch und Deutsch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann. 1902. “Wissenschaft und Romantik.” Sitzungsberichte der königichen-preussischen Akademie zu Berlin vol. 4: 25–43.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walter. 1952. Die Fragmente Der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch.Berlin: Weidmann (= DK).Google Scholar
Dilcher, Roman. 1995. Studies in Heraclitus. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Brendan. 1982. Nietzsche and the French Moralists. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Downing, Eric. 1993. Artificial I’s: The Self As Artwork in Ovid, Kierkegaard, and Thomas Mann. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabinski, John E. 2012. “Affect and Revolution: On Baldwin and Fanon.” Phaenex: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture vol. 7, no.2: 124–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drapela, Nathan. 2020. “A Matter of Taste: Nietzsche and the Structure of Affective Response.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy vol. 63, no. 1: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Robert. 1892a. “La Philosophie du Marteau.” Le Banquet, no. 3 (May): 65–74.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Robert. 1892b. “Frédéric Nietzsche et Peter Gast.” Le Banquet, no. 6 November: 161–167.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2000. “The Poet.” In The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Atkinson, Brooks. New York: Modern Library. 287–307.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2003. “Beauty.” In The Conduct of Life., ed. Packer, Barbara L., Slater, Joseph, and Wilson, Douglas Emory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 149–164.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2010. “Poetry and Imagination.” In Letters and Social Aims, ed. Meyerson, Joel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1–42.Google Scholar
Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt, eds. 2017. Heraklit im Kontext. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féré, Charles. 1888. Dégénérescence et criminalité. Essai physiologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2011. “Genealogy and Morality.” American Dialectic vol. 1, no. 3: 346–69.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2020. “Romanticism and The Birth of Tragedy.” In Romanticism, Philosophy, and Literature, ed. Forster, Michael N. and Steiner, Lina. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2022. “Nietzsche: Three Genealogies of Christianity.” Genealogy 6/38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael N. Forthcoming. “Skepticism about Logic in Germany at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy, ed. Conant, James and Held, Jonas. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon. 76–100.Google Scholar
Fouillée, Alfred. 1902. Nietzsche et l’immoralisme. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Luc. 2013. L’Éclectisme philosophique de Marcel Proust. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Franz, Michael. 2017. “Heraklit und das Artemision. Die Erfindung eines neutralen Standpunkts in der Politik.”In Heraklit im Kontext, ed. Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt. Berlin: De Gruyter. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, Samuel. 2012. Narratives Unsettled: Digression in Robert Walser, Thomas Bernhard, and Adalbert Stifter. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1960. The Sane Society. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986. “Poetry and Mimesis” and “Philosophy and Poetry.” In The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, ed. Bernasconi, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 116–123 and 131–140.Google Scholar
Gagliano, Monica, Ryan, John C., and Vieira, Patricia I., eds. 2017. The Language of Plants: Science, Philosophy, Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. 2013. “Nietzsche’s Philosophical Aestheticism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Gaultier, Jules. 2006 (1902). Le Bovarysme. Essai sur le pouvoir d’imaginer. Reprint ed. Buvik, Per. Paris: Presses de l’Université de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
de Gaultier, Jules. 2007 (1892). Le Bovarysme: La psychologie dans l’œuvre de Flaubert. Reprint ed. Buvik, Per. Paris: Éditions du Sandre.Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken, and Janaway, Chris. 2006. “Nietzsche on Free Will, Autonomy and the Sovereign Individual.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supp. Vols., vol. 80.Google Scholar
George, Stefan. 1907 (1901). “Nietzsche.” In Blätter für die Kunst. Berlin: Blaetter für die Kunst.Google Scholar
Germana, Michael. 2017. Ralph Ellison, Temporal Technologist. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. 2022. The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gide, André. 1997. Journal, II, 1926–1950, ed. Sagaert, Martine. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar
Gide, André. 1999. “Lettre à Angèle [VI] Friedrich Nietzsche.” In Essais critiques, ed. Masson, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade. 34–43.Google Scholar
Gide, André. 2001 (1924). “Si le grain ne meurt.” In Souvenirs et voyages, ed. Masson, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander L. 1976. “Parody and Parallel: Heine, Nietzsche, and the Classical World.” In Studies in Nietzsche and the Classical Tradition, ed. O’Flaherty, James C., Sellner, Timothy F., and Helm, Robert Meredith. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 199–213.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander L., Blair, Carole, and Parent, David J., eds. 1989. Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander L., and Reichenbach, Ingeborg. 1985. Begegnungen mit Nietzsche. 2nd rev. ed. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Golomb, Jacob. 1997. Nietzsche and Jewish Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gooding-Williams, Robert. 2001. Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gooding-Williams, Robert. 2006. “Foreword: Supposing Nietzsche to Be Black. What Then?” In Critical Affinities: Nietzsche and African American Thought, ed. Scott, Jacqueline and Franklin, A. Todd. Ithaca: State University of New York Press. vii–xviii.Google Scholar
Gori, Pietro. 2019. Nietzsche’s Pragmatism: A Study on Perspectival Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Herbert. 2004. “Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 26: 1–17.Google Scholar
Grätz, Katharina, and Kaufmann, Sebastian. 2017. Nietzsche als Dichter: Lyrik Poetologie-Rezeption. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundlehner, Philip. 1986. The Poetry of Friedrich Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2021. Prose of the World: Denis Diderot and the Periphery of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gump, Margaret. 1974. Adalbert Stifter. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Gusman, Simon. 2022. “The Secret Smiles of Things: Sartre’s Realism Reconsidered.” Human Studies, no. 45: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Helen. 2022. The Elizabethan Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Häfner, Ralph, Kaufmann, Sebastian, and Sommer, Andreas Urs, eds. 2019. Nietzsches Literaturen. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halévy, Daniel, and Gregh, Fernand. 1892. “Frédéric Nietzsche.” Le Banquet, no. 2 (April): 33–35.Google Scholar
Hall, Michael. 2011. Plants and Persons: A Philosophical Botany. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, David. 1999. “Schopenhauer and Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerschlag, Sarah. 2010. The Figural Jew: Politics and Identity in Postwar French Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerschlag, Sarah. 2016. Broken Tablets: Levinas, Derrida and the Literary Afterlife of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence J. 2018. “What Kind of Text Is Zarathustra?” The Agonist vol. 11, no. 2. Spring. https://agonist.nietzschecircle.com/wp/what-kind-of-text-is-zarathustra-by-lawrence-j-hatab.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. 1928–1941. Sämtliche Werke. Jubiläumausgabe in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Glockner, Hermann. Stuttgart: Fromman.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1961. Nietzsche. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1967. “Who Is Nietzsche’s Zarathustra?” Review of Metaphysics vol. 20, no. 3 (March).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche, Vols. 1 and 2, trans. David Farrell Krell. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Erich. 1988. “Rilke and Nietzsche with a Discourse on Thought, Belief and Poetry.” In Heller, Erich, The Importance of Nietzsche: Ten Essays. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 87–127.Google Scholar
Hemsterhuis, François. 2010. Ma toute chère Diotime: Lettres à la princesse de Gallitzin, 1785, ed. van Sluis, Jacob. Berltsum: Van Sluis.Google Scholar
Henry, Anne, ed. 1989. Schopenhauer et la création littéraire en Europe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Higgins, Kathleen Marie. 1987. Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kevin R. 2003. Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundation of His Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, Marian, ed. 2013. Denis Diderot, Satyre seconde: Le Neveu de Rameau. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Hobson, Marian, ed. 2016. Denis Diderot, Rameau’s Nephew: A Multi-media Bilingual Edition, trans. Kate E. Tunstall and Caroline Warman. Cambridge: Open Book.Google Scholar
Höfele, Andreas. 2016. “Nietzsche’s Shakespeare.” In Höfele, Andreas, No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Dana. 2008. Exemplarity and Choseness: Rosenzweig and Derrida on the Nation of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hölscher, Uvo. 1968. Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht [Extracts from sections II and IV of the chapter on Heraclitus (“Orakel-Stil,” pp. 136–141, “Gleichnis und Spruchform,” pp. 144–149) are translated in Alexander P. D. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 229–239, under the title “Paradox, Simile and Gnomic Utterance in Heraclitus.”]Google Scholar
Hölscher, Uvo. 1979. “Die Wiedergewinnung des Antiken Bodens: Nietzsches Rückgriff auf Heraklit.” Neue Hefte für Philosophie vol. 15, no. 16: 156–182.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum (1st ed. 1944).Google Scholar
Humphries, Jefferson. 1987. The Puritan and the Cynic: Moralists and Theorists in French and American Letters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Nadeem J. Z. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Positivism.” European Journal of Philosophy vol. 12, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Drew A. 1997. “Caring for Myth: Heidegger, Plato and the Myth of Cura.” Research in Phenomenology vol. 27: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. 1997. “Nietzsche’s Illustration of the Art of Exegesis.” European Journal of Philosophy vol. 5, no. 3: 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. 2009. “Plato and the Arts.” In A Companion to Plato, ed. Benson, Hugh H.. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. 388–401.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice, and Menke, Anne, eds. 1991. Shifting Scenes: Interviews on Women, Politics and Writing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jarrety, Michel. 1991. Valéry devant la littérature: Mesure de la limite. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. 1983. The Dialogical and the Dialectical Neveu de Rameau: How Diderot Adopted Socrates and Hegel Adopted Diderot. Protocol of the Forty-Fifth Colloquy, 27 February 1983, ed. Herzog, William R. II. Berkeley, CA: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture.Google Scholar
Jensen, Anthony K. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Unpublished Fragments on Ancient Cynicism: The First Night of Diogenes.” In Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition, ed. Bishop, Paul. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Milbank, ‘Can Morality be Christian’, The Word Made Strange (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 219–32.Google Scholar
John, Milbank, “Sublimity: The Modern Transcendent,” in Transcendence ed. Regina Schwartz (London: Routledge, 2004), 211–234Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark and Lakoff, George. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. 1988. Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, Vol. 1, ed. Jarrett, James L.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter. 1968. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter. 1980. “Nietzsche and Rilke” and “Philosophy versus Poetry.” In Kaufmann, Walter, From Shakespeare to Existentialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 219–241 and 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter, ed. 1989. Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
Klonosky, Richard J. 1984. “Being and Time Said All at Once: An Analysis of Section 42.” Tulane Studies in Philosophy vol. 32: 62–68.Google Scholar
Klossowski, Pierre. 1963. “Nietzsche, le polythéisme et la parodie.” in Un si funeste désir, ed. Klossowski, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard. 173–212.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1983. Nietzsche et la métaphore. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1986a. Nietzsche et la scène philosophique. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1986b. Pourquoi rit-on? Freud et le mot d’ésprit. Paris : Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1987. “Nietzsche and the Obscurity of Heraclitus.” Diacritics vol. 17, no. 3: 39–55 (trans. Françoise Lionnet-McCumber; French original in Sarah Kofman. 1990. Séductions. De Sartre à Héraclite. Paris: Galilée. 89–137).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1990. “Conversions: The Merchant of Venice under the Sign of Saturn.” In Literary Theory Today, ed. Collier, Peter and Geyer-Ryan., Helga Cambridge: Polity Press. 142–166.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1993a. Explosions II. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1993b. Nietzsche and Metaphor, trans. Duncan Large. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1994a. Le Mepris des Juifs: Nietzsche, les Juifs, l’Antisemitisme. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1994b. Rue Ordener, Rue Labat. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1994c. “Les mains d’Antelme: Post-Scriptum à Paroles suffoquées.” Lignes, no. 21: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1998. Smothered Words, trans. Madeleine Dobie. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 2007. Selected Writings, ed. Albrecht, Thomas, Albert, Georgia, and Rottenberg, Elizabeth G.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovari, Sarolta. 2018. “Nietzsche, Gerber und die Frage nach der Sprache.” Nagyerdei Almanach vol. 1, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1991. Strangers to Ourselves, trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 1993. The Subject of Philosophy, ed. Trezise, Thomas, trans. Thomas Trezise, Hugh J. Silverman, Gary M. Cole, Timothy D. Bent, Karen McPherson, and Claudett Sartiliot. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 83. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Laks, André. 2007. “Écriture et prose: un autre récit des débuts de la philosophie grecque.” In Histoire, Doxographie, Vérité. Études sur Aristote, Théophraste et la philosophie présocratique, ed. Laks, André. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. 167–179.Google Scholar
Laks, André. 2011. “L’Héraclite physicien de Schleiermacher.” In The Presocratics from the Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels, ed. Primavesi, Oliver and Luchner, Katarina. Stuttgart: Steiner. 281–309.Google Scholar
Laks, André, and Most, Glenn W.. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (=LM). [Heraclitus in Vol. III/2, Early Ionian Thinkers].Google Scholar
Lamb, Peter, and London, Douglas Burnham. 2019. The First Marx: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Lampert, Laurence. 1986. Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Large, Duncan. 2001. Nietzsche and Proust: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, Duncan. 2013. “Nietzsche et compagnie: La pluralisation de la première personne.” In Nietzsche, un art nouveau du discours, ed. Denat, Céline and Wotling, Patrick. Reims: EPURE, Éditions et Presses universitaires de Reims. 103–125.Google Scholar
Large, Duncan. 2017. “‘Lorenz Sterne’ among German Philosophers: Reception and Influence.” Textual Practice vol. 31, no. 2: 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. 2019. “Poetry of the Present.” In Life with a Capital L. Essays chosen by Geoff Dyer. London: Penguin. 77–83.Google Scholar
Le Rider, Jacques. 1999. Nietzsche en France, de la fin du XIXe siècle au temps présent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Le Rider, Jacques. 2005. “Gabriel Monod.” In Malwida von Meysenbug. Une Européenne du XIXe siècle, ed. Le Rider, Jacques. Paris: Bartillat. 301–351.Google Scholar
Le Rider, Jacques. 2017a. “Proust et Nietzsche.” Revue d’études proustiennes vol. 5, no. 1: 209–234.Google Scholar
Le Rider, Jacques, ed. 2017b. Nietzsche dans la littérature française au tournant du XIXe et du XXe siècle, in Cahiers de l’Association internationale des études françaises no. 69, May.Google Scholar
Le Verrier, Charles. 1901. “Nietzsche.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale vol. 9 (January): 70–99.Google Scholar
Lecznar, Adam. 2020. Dionysus after Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy in Twentieth-Century Literature and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2002. Nietzsche on Morality. 2nd rev. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. 2009. Nietzsche’s Animal Philosophy: Culture, Politics and the Animality of the Human Being. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa, ed. 2015. Nietzsche and the Becoming of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. 2020. Homo Natura: Nietzsche, Philosophical Anthropology and Biopolitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. 2021. “The Work of Art and the Death of God in Nietzsche and Agamben.” In Agamben and the Existentialists, ed. Dickinson, Colby and Norris, Marcos. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 83–99.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. 2022. “Posthumanism and Plant Studies.” In Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, ed. Herbrechter, Stefan, Callus, Ivan, Rossini, Manuela, Grech, Marija, de Bruin-Molé, Megen, and Müller, Christopher John. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. 2020. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf. 1985. Die drei Kulturen: Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1934. “Quelques réflexions sur la philosophie de l’hitlérisme” re in Les imprévus de l’histoire. Paris: Fata Morgana. 27–41.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul. S. 2018. “Nietzsche’s Futurism.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies vol. 49, no. 2: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovin, Clifford R. 1967. “Blut und Boden: The Ideological Basis of the Nazi Agricultural Program.” Journal of the History of Ideas vol. 28, no. 2: 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1933. “Kierkegaard und Nietzsche.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte vol. 11: 43–66.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1967. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Magnus, Bernd, Stewart, Stenley, and Mileur, Jean-Pierre. 1993. Nietzsche’s Case: Philosophy as/and Literature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. 1983. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Introduction. Wlad Godzich. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1969. Confessions of Felix Krull Confidence Man (The Early Years), trans. Denver Lindley. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1975. Letters of Thomas Mann 1889–1955, trans. Richard Winston and Clara Winston. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1989. “Felix Krull.” In Death in Venice and Seven Other Stories, trans. Helen T. Lowe-Porter. New York: Vintage. 359–402.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1990a. “[Der autobiographische Roman].” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 11:700–703.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1990b. “Bekenntnisse des Hochstaplers Felix Krull.” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 7:263–661.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1990c. “Nietzsche’s Philosophie im Lichte unserer Erfahrung.” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 9:675–713.Google Scholar
Manolescu, Georges. 1905. Ein Fürst der Diebe: Memoiren. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Manolescu, Georges. 1906. Gescheitert: Aus dem Seelenleben eines Verbrechers. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap. 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos As a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marder, Michael. 2013. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999. Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975. Early Writings, ed. Colletti, Lucio. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. 2015. “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception.” Ergo vol. 2, no. 29: 737–777.Google Scholar
Mauldon, Margaret, trans. 2008. Denis Diderot, Rameau’s Nephew, and, First Satire. Introduction and notes by Nicholas Cronk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayfield, D. S. 2015. Artful Immorality – Variants of Cynicism: Machiavelli, Gracián, Diderot, Nietzsche. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, Scott. 2005. Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos of Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijers, Anthonie. 1988. “Gustav Gerber und Friedrich Nietzsche.” Nietzsche Studien 17.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. 2018. “Hawthorne and His Mosses.” Moby-Dick, ed. Parker, Hershel. New York: Norton. 544–559.Google Scholar
Mendes-Flohr, Paul. 1997. “Zarathustra’s Apostle: Martin Buber and the Jewish Renaissance.” In Nietzsche and Jewish Culture, ed. Golomb, Jacob. London: Routledge. 233–243.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 2006. “The Scientific Revolution and The Death of Nature.” Isis, no. 97: 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merimée, Prosper. 1989. “The Etruscan Vase.” In Carmen and Other Stories, trans. Nicholas Jotcham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 93–116.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Paul. 1886. “Rev. of Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse.” Berlin National-Zeitung vol. 39, no. 672 (December): 1–2.Google Scholar
Middleton, Christopher. 1996. Selected Letters of Friedrich Nietzsche. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Monod, Gabriel. 1897. “Enquête sur l’influence de Taine, 1828–1893: Quelques opinions sur l’œuvre de Taine.” La Revue blanche vol. 13 (January): 263–295.Google Scholar
Montinari, Mazzino. 2003. Reading Nietzsche, trans. Greg Whitlock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
More, Nicholas D. 2014. Nietzsche’s Last Laugh: Ecce Homo As Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morland, Jacques. 1902. “Enquête sur l’influence allemande.” Mercure de France vol. 44, no. 155 (November): 328–332.Google Scholar
Mornet, Daniel. 1927. “La véritable signification du ‘Neveu de Rameau.’” Revue des deux mondes vol. 40, no. 4: 881–908.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. 1989. “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature.” Michigan Quarterly Review vol. 28, no. 1: 1–34.Google Scholar
Mouraviev, Serge. 2003. Heraclitea III/1 Recensio: Memoria. Testimonia de Vita, Morte ac Scripto. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Mouraviev, Serge. 2011. Heraclitea IVA. Refectio. Liber a nobis restitutus. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Müller-Lauter, Wolfgang. 1971. Nietzsche: Seine Philosophie der Gegensätze und die Gegensätze seiner Philosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Emmanuel, and Topolski, Anna, eds. 2016. Is There a Judeo-Christian Tradition? A European Perspective. Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts, Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nealon, Jeff T. 2016. Plant Theory: Biopower and Vegetable Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nectoux, Jean-Michel. 1999. “Miroirs de Vinteuil. Portrait de l’artiste en mélomane.” In Marcel Proust: L’écriture et les arts, ed. Tadié, Jean-Yves and Callu, Florence. Paris: Gallimard. 43–53.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. 1981. “‘Getting Used to Not Getting Used to It’: Nietzsche in The Magic Mountain.” Philosophy and Literature vol. 5, no. 1: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. 1985. Nietzsche: Life As Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ngai, Sianne. 2020. Theory of the Gimmick: Aesthetic Judgement and Captialist Form. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1979. Der Kynismus des Diogenes und der Begriff des Zynismus. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1980. “Der ‘Kurze Weg’: Nietzsches ‘Cynismus.’” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte vol. 24, no. 1: 103–122.Google Scholar
Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1996. “The Modern Reception of Cynicism: Diogenes in the Enlightenment.” In The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, ed. Branham, Robert Bracht and Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile. Berkeley: University of California Press. 329–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nola, Robert, and Sankey, Howard. 2014. Theories of Scientific Method: An Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Jana. 2021. Posthuman Legal Subjectivity: Reimagining the Human in the Anthropocene. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Marcos Antonio. 2018. “Existential Choice As Repressed Theism: Jean-Paul Sartre and Giorgio Agamben in Conversation.” Religions vol. 9, no. 106: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okiji, Fumi. 2018. Jazz As Critique: Adorno and Black Expression Revisited. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 1993. “A Dagger through the Heart: The Ethics of Reading Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals.” International Studies in Philosophy vol. 25: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2015. Earth and World: Philosophy after the Apollo Missions. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, Octavio. 1973. The Bow and the Lyre, trans. Ruth L. C. Simms. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Roger. 1988. Stendhal’s Violin: A Novelist and His Reader. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry, trans. 2018. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, Louis. 1995. Les Neveux de Zarathoustra: La réception de Nietzsche en France. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Poe, Edgar Allan. 1986. “Philosophy of Composition.” The Fall of the House of Usher & Other Writings, ed. Galloway, David. London: Penguin. 430–443.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 1998. “Unconscious Agency in Nietzsche.” Nietzsche-Studien vol. 27: 153–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, James I. 2000a. The Invention of Dionysus: An Essay on “The Birth of Tragedy”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 2000b. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 2010a. “Nietzsche, Rhetoric, Philology.” In Philology and Its Histories, ed. Gurd, Sean. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 164–191.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 2010b. “Theater of the Absurd: Nietzsche’s Genealogy As Cultural Critique.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly vol. 84, no. 2: 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, James I. 2012. “Nietzsche’s Genealogy As Performative Critique.” In Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Boer, Karin de and Sonderegger, Ruth. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 2018. “Untimely Philology: Nietzsche, Classics, and Modernity.” In A New Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Stern, Tom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. 2022. “How Ideal Is the Ancient Self?” In The Possibility for Idealism in the 21st Century, ed. Kroupa, Gregor andSimonti, Jure. Berlin: De Gruyter. 3–26.Google Scholar
de Pourtalès, Guy. 1991. Journal II: 1919–1941. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1971. Contre Sainte-Beuve précédé de Pastiches et mélanges suivi de Essais et articles, ed. Clarac, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1978. Correspondance de Marcel Proust. Tome IV: 1904, ed. Kolb, Philip. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1988. À la recherche du temps perdu, ed. Tadié, Jean-Yves, Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 2002. Carnets, ed. Callu, Florence and Compagnon, Antoine. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 2003a. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 2: In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. James Grieve. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 2003b. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 3: The Guermantes Way, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Mark Treharne. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 2003c. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 5: The Prisoner and The Fugitive, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Carol Clark. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 2003d. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 6: Finding Time Again, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Ian Patterson. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Raymond, Christopher C. 2019. “Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Socrates.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, ed. Moore, Christopher. Leiden: Brill. 837–880.Google Scholar
Reich, Hauke. 2012. Rezensionen und Reaktionen zu Nietzsches Werken: 1872–1889. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Karl. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der Philosophie. Bonn: Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Karl. 1982. “Heraklits Lehre vom Feuer” [1942] and “Heraclitea” [1942]. In K. R., Vermächtnis der Antike. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 41–71 and 72–97.Google Scholar
Reschke, Renate. 2017. “‘Die Welt ist ein Spiel des Zeus … ‘: Friedrich Nietzsches ästhetische Sicht auf Heraklit.” In Heraklit im Kontext, ed. Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt. Heraklit im Kontext. Berlin: De Gruyter. 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rex, Walter E. 1998. Diderot’s Counterpoints: The Dynamics of Contrariety in His Major Works. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Mattia. 2021. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Jean Paul. 1963. Vorschule der aesthetik; nebst einigen Vorlesungen in Leipzig über die Parteien der Zeit. I. Oder Miserikoridas-Vorlesung über die Kunst für Stilistiker (1813). In Werke, Vol. 5, ed. Muller, Norbert. Munich: Carl Hansen.Google Scholar
Ridley, Aaron. 2013. “Nietzsche and the Arts of Life.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rilke, Rainer Maria. 2011. Letters to a Young Poet, trans. Charlie Louth. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Robertson, Michael. 2012. “Nietzsche’s Poet-Philosopher: Towards a Poetics of Response-ability, Possibility, and the Future.” Mosaic vol. 45, no. 1: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robichaud, Denis J. J. 2018. Plato’s Persona: Marsilio Ficino, Renaissance Humanism, and Platonic Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, Allistair, ed. 2006. Sartre’s Nausea: Text, Context, Intertext. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stanley. 2004. The Mask of Enlightenment: Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G. 1988. “Das Kuckuckskapitel.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte vol. 62, no. 3:540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Donald A., and Konstan, David, eds. 2005. Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Sabot, Philippe. 2004. “Gide disciple de Nietzsche? L’Immoraliste en 1902.” In Le Moment 1900 en philosophie, ed. Worms, Frédéric. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin. 1857. Causeries du lundi. 3rd ed. 15 vols. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin. 2014. Menschen des XVIII: Jahrhunderts, ed. Overbeck, Ida and Urs Sommer, Andreas, trans. Ida Overbeck. Berlin: Die Andere Bibliothek.Google Scholar
Sand, George 1956. Winter in Majorca, trans. Robert Graves. Mallorca: Valldemosa Edition.Google Scholar
Santaniello, Weaver Santaniello. 1997. “Nietzsche and the Jews: Christendom and Nazism.” In Nietzsche and Jewish Culture, ed. Golomb, Jacob. London: Routledge. 21–54.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 1940. The Realm of Spirit. London: Constable and Company.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 1968. “Shelley: Or the Poetic Value of Revolutionary Principles.” In Selected Critical Writings of George Santayana, ed. Henfrey, Norman. London: Cambridge University Press. 57–81.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 1989. “The Poetry of Barbarism.” In Santayana, George, Interpretations of Poetry and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 103–131.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 2009. “The Elements and Function of Poetry.” In The Essential Santayana: Selected Writings, ed. The Santayana Edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 265–282.Google Scholar
Santini, Carlotta. 2014. “The History of Literature As an Issue: Nietzsche’s Attempt to Represent Antiquity.” In Nietzsche As a Scholar of Antiquity, ed. Jensen, Anthony K. and Heit., Helmut London: Bloomsbury Academic. 159–179.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1984. Existentialism and Humanism. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. The Transcendence of the Ego. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2013. Nausea, trans. Lloyd Alexander. New York: New Direction.Google Scholar
Schaberg, William H. 1995. The Nietzsche Canon: A Publication History and Bibliography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schacht, Richard, ed. 1994. Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1958–2020. Kritische Friedrich–Schlegel–Ausgabe, ed. Behler, Ernst with Anstett, Jean Jacques and Eichner, Hans. 36 vols. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1968. Gespräch über die Poesie, ed. Eichner, Hans. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1838. Sämtliche Werke, Siebenter Band: Hermeneutik und Kritik mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament, ed. Lücke, Friedrich. Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1998a. Herakleitos der dunkle, von Ephesos, dargestellt aus den Trümmern seines Werkes und den Zeugnissen der Alten (1808). In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, I/ 6, ed. Schmid, Dirk. Berlin: De Gruyter. 107–241.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1998b. Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schober, Angelika. 1993. “Diderot et Nietzsche.” Diderot Studies vol. 25: 89–107.Google Scholar
Schonfield, Ernst. 2008. Art and Its Uses in Thomas Mann’s Felix Krull. Bithell Series of Dissertations. London: Maney.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, 1912. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, ed. Berndl, Ludwig. Munich: Georg Müller.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1966. The World As Will and Representation, Vol. 2, trans. Eric F. J. Payne. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The World As Will and Representation, Vol. 1, trans. Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Grant F., ed. 2002. The Letters of John Keats. Based on the Texts of Hyder Edward Rollins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schrift, Alan. 1990. Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schrift, Alan. 1995. Nietzsche’s French Legacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Jacqueline, and Franklin, A. Todd, eds. 2006. Critical Affinities: Nietzsche and African American Thought. Ithaca: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Peter R. 1997. “Nietzsche As Literature / Nietzsche As ‘German’ Literature.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, no. 13: 53–71.Google Scholar
Shea, Louisa. 2010. The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sier, Kurt. 2012. “Warum ist Heraklit so schwierig?” In Die Geburt der Griechischen Weisheit, ed. Kath, Roxana and Rücker., Michaela Halle: Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Regionalstudien Vorderer Orient, Afrika, Asien der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. 41–56.Google Scholar
Silk, Michael. 2016. “Nietzsche’s Socrateases.” In Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Trapp, Michael. London: Taylor and Francis. 37–57.Google Scholar
da Silva, Denise Ferreira. 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1986. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, trans. Helmut Loiskandl, Deena Weinstein, and Michael Weinstein. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Sjögren, Christine Oertel. 1972. The Marble Statue As Idea: Collected Essays on Adalbert Stifter’s Der Nachsommer. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2011. Bubbles: Spheres I. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2014. Globes: Spheres II. Macrospherology. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Small, Helen. 2020. The Function of Cynicism at the Present Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, Bruno. 1926. “Die Sprache Heraclits.” Hermes vol. 61: 353–381 (= Gesammelte Schriften, Gottingen, 1966, 129–151).Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 2003. Living with Nietzsche: What the Great “Immoralist” Has to Teach Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Andreas Urs. 2019. Kommentar zu Nietzsches “Zur Genealogie der Moral”. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict de. 2018. Ethics Proved in Geometrical Order, ed. Kisner, Matthew J., trans. Michael Silverthorne and Matthew J. Kisner. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. 2012. Diderot, un diable de ramage. Paris: Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staten, Henry. 1990. Nietzsche’s Voice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stendhal, . 1962. Racine and Shakespeare, trans. Guy Daniels. New York: Crowell-Collier.Google Scholar
Stern, J. P. 1971. Idylls and Realities. Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature. London: Methuen and Company.Google Scholar
Stifter, Adalbert. 1994. Bunte Steine. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Stifter, Adalbert. 2005. Nachsommer. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Stifter, Adalbert. 2009. Indian Summer, trans. Wendell Frye. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stifter, Adalbert. 2021. Motley Stones, trans. Isabel Fargo Cole. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. 2011. “Sad versus Joyful Passions: Spinoza, Nietzsche, and the Transformation of Whiteness.” Philosophy Today vol. 55 (Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy [SPEP] Supplement): 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, Martin, and Swales, Erika. 1984. Adalbert Stifter: A Critical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tadié, Jean-Yves. 1996. Marcel Proust: Biographie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Tanner, Michael. 2000. Nietzsche: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. 1998. A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Trahan, Elizabeth Welt. 1957. “Friedrich Nietzsche’s Literary Criticism and Its European Background.” Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Tuncel, Yunus. 2014. “Why Do Poets Lie Too Much? Nietzsche, Poetry and the Different Voices of Zarathustra.” The Agonist vol. 8. bit.ly/43iPqc2.Google Scholar
Ullern, Isabelle, and Michaud, Genette. 2018. Sarah Kofman et Jacques Derrida: Croisements, Ecarts, Différences. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Usher, Mark D. 1998. Homeric Stitchings: The Homeric Centos of the Empress Eudocia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1957. “Poésie et pensée abstraite.” In Œuvres, Vol. 1, ed. Hytier, Jean. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade. 1314–1339.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1986. “Cartesius redivivus.” In Cahiers Paul Valéry 4, ed. Jarrety, Michel. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 2004. “Lettre à Pierre Louÿs du 15 février 1899.” In Gide, André, Louÿs, Pierre, and Valéry, Paul, Correspondance à trois voix, ed. Fawcett, Peter and Mercier, Pascal, Paris: Gallimard. 878.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 2015 (1972). Collected Works of Paul Valéry, Volume 8: Leonardo, Poe, Mallarme, trans. Malcolm Cowley and James Lawler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 2017. Sur Nietzsche, ed. Jarrety, Michel. Paris: La Coopérative.Google Scholar
Valk, Thorsten, ed. 2009. Friedrich Nietzsche und die Literatur der klassischen Moderne. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1999. New Science, trans. David Marsh. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wampole, Christy. 2016. Rootedness: The Ramifications of a Metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Simone. 2002. The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties towards Mankind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Westerdale, Joel. 2013. Nietzsche’s Aphoristic Challenge. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Alan. 1990. Within Nietzsche’s Labyrinth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science vol. 155, no. 3767: 1203–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedemann, Eva Sophie. 2004. Adalbert Stifters Kosmos. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wilcox, John T. 1974. Truth and Value in Nietzsche. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, John T. 1997. “What Aphorism Does Nietzsche Explicate in ‘Genealogy of Morals’ Essay III?” Journal of the History of Philosophy vol. 35, no. 4 (October): 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, John T. 1998. “That Exegesis of an Aphorism in Genealogy III: Reflections on the Scholarship.” Nietzsche-Studien vol. 28: 448–462.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. 1905. De Profundis. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. 1997 “Magic-Media Mountain: Technology and the Umbildungsroman.” In Reading Matters: Narratives in the New Media Ecology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 29–52.Google Scholar
Wohlfart, Günther. 1991. Also sprach Herakleitos Heraklits Fragment B52 and Nietzsches Heraklit Rezeption. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles T., and Shank, John Bennnett. 2019. “Denis Diderot.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/diderot (Accessed July 12, 2022).Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 2008. “Poetry, Fiction, and the Future.” In Woolf, Virginia, Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–85.Google Scholar
Wysling, Hans. 1982. Narzissmus und illusionäre Existenzform: Zu den Bekenntnissen des Hochstaplers Felix Krull. Thomas Mann Studien, Vol. 5. Bern: Franke.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. 2014. The Death of God and the Meaning of Life. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by James I. Porter, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Nietzsche and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 03 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009052160.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by James I. Porter, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Nietzsche and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 03 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009052160.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by James I. Porter, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Nietzsche and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 03 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009052160.014
Available formats
×