Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:58:07.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Social Media Ethics 2.0

from Part IV - Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

By
Jeremy H. Lipschultz
Edited by
Ali E. Abbas
Ali E. Abbas
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

The development and popularity of computer-mediated communication (CMC), social network sites (SNSs), and social media communication (SMC) sparked twenty-first-century ethical dilemmas (Patching & Hirst, 2014; Barnes, 2003). At the heart of social media ethical concerns are data privacy and ownership. The fallout from the Cambridge Analytica data breach on Facebook, which followed a class action settlement in 2012 over the Beacon program, offers clear evidence that lack of user consent over gathering and disseminating information is a long-standing problem (Terelli, Jr. & Splichal, 2018). Facebook appears to have made the problem worse by allowing user data access to outside, third-party program applications (“apps”), and granting user friends the ability to further weaken privacy (Stratton, 2014).

Type
Chapter
Information
Next-Generation Ethics
Engineering a Better Society
 , pp. 426 - 441
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, S. A. (2003). Computer-Mediated communication: Human-to-Human communication across the Internet. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Bowen, S. A. (2013). Using classic social media cases to distill ethical guidelines for digital engagement. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(1), 119–133.Google Scholar
Bowen, S. A., & Stacks, D. W. (2014). Understanding the ethical and research implications of social media. In DiStaso, M. W. & Bortree (Eds.), D. S., Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. 217–234). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caldiero, C. (2016). Neo-PR, public relations in a postmodern world. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carey, J. W. (1992). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christians, C. G., Rotzoll, K. B., & Fackler, M. (1995, 1991). Media ethics, case & moral reasoning, third and fourth editions. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Chung, D. S. & Nah, S. (2013). Media credibility and journalistic role conceptions: Views on citizen and professional journalists among citizen contributors. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(4), 271–288.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, A. & Young, T. M. (2012). Ethics and social media: Implications for sociolinguistics in the networked public. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(4), 532–546.Google Scholar
Dinan, S. (2016, May 10). Senate begins probe into Facebook over conservative censorship allegations. Washington Times. Retrieved from www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/10/senate-begins-probe-facebook-censorship-allegation/Google Scholar
DiStaso, M. W. (2014). Bank of America’s Facebook engagement challenges its claims of “high ethical standards.” In DiStaso, M. W. & Bortree, D. S. (Eds.), Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. 21–32). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, (2017). 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer, Global Annual Study. Retrieved from www.edelman.com/trust2017/Google Scholar
Elonis v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2001 (2015).Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (2016, May 23). In the Matter of Lord & Taylor, LLC. C-4576. Retrieved from www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/152-3181/lord-taylor-llc-matterGoogle Scholar
Fraleigh, D. M., & Tuman, J. S. (1997). Freedom of speech in the marketplace of ideas. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. M. (1996). Liberalism divided. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Gallicano, T. D., Bivens, T. H., & Cho, Y. Y. (2014). Considerations regarding ghost blogging and ghost commenting. In DiStaso, M. W. and Bortree, D. S. (Eds.), Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. 21–32). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gettys, T. (2015, April 2). “Proud of yourself sweeties?”: Trolls attack reporter who quoted anti-LGBT pizza shop owner. Raw Story. Retrieved from www.rawstory.com/2015/04/proud-of-yourself-sweetie-trolls-attack-reporter-who-quoted-anti-lgbt-pizza-shop-owner/Google Scholar
GSS Data Explorer. (n.d.). NORC GSS compress variable. Retrieved from https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/variables/454/vshowGoogle Scholar
Guo, C. (2016). Unscalable, unorthodox startup growth stories. San Francisco, CA: Inkshares.Google Scholar
Himelboim, I., Lariscy, R. W., Tinkham, S. F., & Sweetser, K. D. (2012). Social media and online political communication: The role of interpersonal informational trust and openness. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(1), 92–115.Google Scholar
Hochberg, A. (2014). Centers of investigative reporting. In McBride, K. & Rosenstiel, T. (Eds.), The new ethics of journalism (pp. 123–135). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Huang, T. (2014). Centers of investigative reporting. In McBride, K. & Rosenstiel, T. (Eds.), The new ethics of journalism (pp. 39–59). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
James, C., Davis, K., Flores, A., Francis, J., Pettingill, L., Rundle, M., & Gardner, H. (2010). Young people, ethics, and the new digital media. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 215–284.Google Scholar
King, H. (2016, May 12). Zuckerberg wants to meet with conservatives amid Facebook bias allegations. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/12/technology/facebook-trending-guidelines/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroger Co. of Mich. v. Granger, NLRB, No. 07-CA-098566 (April 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Leonard, L. G. & Toller, P. (2012). Speaking Ill of the dead: Anonymity and communication about suicide on MyDeathSpace.com. Communication Studies, 63(4), 387–404.Google Scholar
Lipschultz, J. H. (2018). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics (2nd edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipschultz, J. H. (2016, November 11). Dealing with social media bullies. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dealing-with-social-media-bullies_us_582615b3e4b02b1f5257a113Google Scholar
Lipton, E., Sanger, D. E., & Shane, S. (2016, December 13). The perfect weapon: How Russian cyberpower invaded the U.S. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. (1995). Milestones in mass communication research, media effects (3rd edition). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Mathewson, J. (2014). Law and ethics for today’s journalist: A concise guide. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
McBride, K. & Rosenstiel, T. (Eds.) (2014). The new ethics of journalism, principles for the 21st century. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mihailidis, P. (2014). Media literacy and the emerging citizen: Youth, engagement and participation in digital culture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mills, Jon L. (2015). Privacy in the new media age. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Motlagh, N. E., Hassan, M. S. B. H., Bolong, J. B., & Osman, M. N. (2013). Role of journalists’ gender, work experience and education in ethical decision making. Asian Social Science, 9(9), 1–10.Google Scholar
National Opinion Research Center (2016). NORC General Social Survey (GSS). http://gss.norc.org/Google Scholar
Nunez, M. (2016, May 9). Former Facebook workers: We routinely suppressed conservative news. Gizmodo. http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006Google Scholar
Ontario v. Quon, 560 U.S. 746 (2010).Google Scholar
Owen, L. H. (2016, May 10). Facebook: “No evidence” that contractors “manipulated trending topics” or suppressed conservative viewpoints. Nieman Lab. www.niemanlab.org/2016/05/facebook-no-evidence-that-contractors-manipulated-trending-topics-or-suppressed-conservative-viewpoints/Google Scholar
Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S.Ct. 1730, 1736 (2017).Google Scholar
Patching, R. & Hirst, M. (2014). Journalism ethics, arguments and cases for the twenty-first century. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pegoraro, R. (2016, May 11). There are worse things than manipulated ‘trending’ story lists. Yahoo! Finance. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-only-thing-worse-than-a-manipulated-%E2%80%9Ctrending%E2%80%9D-list--an-unfiltered-on-162716282.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pompper, (2015). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability and public relations: Negotiating multiple complex challenges. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521. U.S. 844 (1997).Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (2012). Identifying and defining values in media codes of ethics. Journal of Media Ethics, 27(2), 115–129.Google Scholar
Schiller, H. (1989). Culture, Inc. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shirky, C. (2014). Truth without scarcity, ethics without force. In McBride, K. & Rosenstiel, T. (Eds.), The new ethics of journalism (pp. 9–24). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith v. Maryland. 442 U.S. 735 (1979).Google Scholar
Smolla, R. A. (1992). Free speech in an open society. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Solis, B. (2014). Forward: Social media is lost without a social compass. In DiStaso, M. W. & Bortree, D. S. (Eds.), Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. xv–xxiv). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevenson, N. (1995). Understanding media cultures, social theory and mass communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stratton, S. E. (2014). Password please: Rethinking the constitutional right to information privacy in the context of social media. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 41, 649–679.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (2017, January 8). It’s time to retire the tainted term “fake news.” The Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/its-time-to-retire-the-tainted-term-fake-news/2017/01/06/a5a7516c-d375-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Terilli, S. A. Jr. & Splichal, S. (2018). Privacy rights in an open and changing society. In Hopkins, W. Wat (ed.), Communication and the law 2018 edition (pp. 287–314). Northport, AL: Vision Press.Google Scholar
Ward, S. J. A. (2019). Disrupting Journalism Ethics, Radical Change on the Frontier of Digital Media. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ward, S. J. A. (2013a, November 4). Why hyping transparency distorts journalism ethics. PBS Media Shift. www.pbs.org/mediashift/2013/11/why-hyping-transparency-distorts-journalism-ethics/Google Scholar
Ward, S. J. A. (2013b, August 19). Why we need radical change for media ethics, not a return to basics. PBS Media Shift. www.pbs.org/mediashift/2013/08/why-we-need-radical-change-for-media-ethics-not-a-return-to-basics/Google Scholar
Ward, S. J. A. & Wasserman, H. (2010). Towards an open ethics: Implications of new media platforms for global ethics discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25, 275–292.Google Scholar
Waters, R. D. (2014). Openness and disclosure in social media efforts, a frank discussion with Fortune 500 and Philanthropy 400 communication leaders. In DiStaso, M. W. & Bortree, D. S. (Eds.), Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. 3–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winchel, B. (2016, February 23). Yelp employee’s angry open letter to CEO starts online firestorm. PR Daily. www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Yelp_employees_angry_open_letter_to_CEO_starts_onl_20213.aspxGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×