Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:19:33.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Detecting outliers in flood data with geostatistical methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

L. Gottschalk
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysics, University of Oslo, Norway
I. Krasovskaia
Affiliation:
Hydroconsult AB, Uppsala, Sweden
Z. W. Kundzewicz
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Agricultural and Forest Environment Studies, Pol. Acad. Sci., Poznan and Institute of Geophysics, Pol. Acad. Sci., Warsaw, Poland
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Affiliation:
World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT The plausibility analysis of the regional flood data of Southern Norway is performed with the help of geostatistical methods. As the data at a number of sites are analyzed, one can account the spatial relationships in the outliers detection problem. That is the results of outliers detection may differ in comparison to the non-structured (univariate) case. The geostatistical methods applied are block kriging and Switzer's location-specific covariance analysis, with catchment areas accounted.

INTRODUCTION

An intuitive definition of an outlier can be ‘an observation which deviates so much from other observations as to arise suspicions that it was generated by a different mechanism’ (Hawkins, 1980). An outlying observation can be interpreted in several ways. It may represent an event of extreme magnitude (e.g. due to rare natural causes) that has unexpectedly happened in the system. In flood frequency analysis such extreme events are of outmost importance, indicating a heavy right tail of the parent distribution. On the other hand, a value differing from the remainder of the data set may be an erroneous observation. This could have been caused by instrument malfunctioning or human mistakes (e.g. at the stage of interpretation of the rating curve for high flows). In this latter case outliers may contaminate the data and reduce the useful information about the natural process.

Detection of outliers in hydrological data can be performed in a number of ways. Kottegoda (1984) considered approaches based either on distributional, mixture, or slippage alternatives for investigation of a series of maximum annual flows.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×