Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:28:34.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - The Bible in medieval universities

from Part III - The Bible Interpreted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2012

Richard Marsden
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
E. Ann Matter
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

The emergence of universities in the thirteenth century had a significant impact on the study of the Bible. Preparatory changes had already taken place in the twelfth century at cathedral schools, such as Laon, Chartres and Paris, and at houses of newly founded canonical orders, such as St Victor in Paris. Yet the principal setting for biblical study in the early Middle Ages, namely monasteries, remained an important context, particularly those of the Cistercian order. What was new in the thirteenth century was the emergence of a different institutional setting, universities, some of which possessed a faculty of theology with a corporation of masters responsible for teaching that included biblical instruction. The university structure brought together independent secular clerics who were teaching theology, such as Peter the Cantor, Peter of Poitiers, Simon of Tournai and Stephen Langton, into one corporate body, soon to be joined by members of a new type of religious order, the mendicant friars. These new orders, such as the Franciscans and Dominicans, and later the Augustinian Hermits and Carmelites, ostensibly supported their mission of preaching and care of souls through begging (thus the term mendicant); they saw universities, particularly Paris, as an ideal location for training their most talented members in theology and biblical studies. For the first time the study of the Bible no longer simply served the liturgical, homiletical and spiritual needs of individuals and communities; it became an academic discipline.

Throughout the thirteenth century faculties of theology were limited to certain universities, principally Paris, Oxford and Cambridge, with Paris the most important of that group. Eventually degree-granting theological faculties were created at Toulouse, Bologna, Prague, Vienna, Cologne, Louvain and elsewhere, but the faculty of theology at Paris continued to dominate throughout the late Middle Ages. Equally important, however, were the schools (studia) of the mendicant orders, which paralleled university programmes and were partially integrated with them. Secular clerics and mendicant friars shared a common goal for biblical study: preparation for preaching, even as the content of the Bible provided material for the study of doctrine, speculative theology and ethical teaching. And the speculative aspect of theological study, in turn, had a shaping effect on the study of the Bible.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Spicq, C., Esquisse d’une histoire de l’exégèse latine au moyen âge (Paris: Vrin, 1944)Google Scholar
de Luba, H.c, Exégèse médiévale. Les quatre sens de l’Écriture, 4 vols. (Paris: Aubier, 1959–64)Google Scholar
Evans, G. R., The Language and Logic of the Bible. The Road to Reformation (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, M., Artes and the Bible in the Medieval West (Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum, 1993)Google Scholar
Dahan, G., L’exégèse chrétienne de la Bible en occident médiéval, XIIe–XIVe siècle (Paris: Cerf, 1999)Google Scholar
Smith, L., Masters of the Sacred Page. Manuscripts of Theology in the Latin West to 1274 (University of Notre Dame Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Ocker, C., Biblical Poetics before Humanism and Reformation (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Chartularium universitatis Parisiensis, ed. H. Denifle and Châtelain, É., vol. i (Paris: Delalain, 1989), no. 5, p. 65Google Scholar
Smalley, B., ‘The Bible in the Medieval Schools’, in CHB ii, p. 200; B. Smalley, The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983), pp. 281–7Google Scholar
Smalley, B., The Gospels in the Schools, c.1100–c.1280 (London: Hambledon, 1985)Google Scholar
Verger, J., ‘L’exégèse de l’université’, in P. Riché and G. Lobrichon (eds.), Le moyen âge et la Bible, Bible de Tous le Temps 4 (Paris: Beauchesne, 1984), pp. 199–232Google Scholar
Bériou, N., L’avènement des maîtres de la Parole. La prédication à Paris au XIIIe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 1998)Google Scholar
D’Avray, D. L., The Preaching of the Friars (OxfordUniversity Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Smalley, , English Friars and Antiquity in the Early Fourteenth Century (Oxford: Blackwell, 1960), pp. 141–8Google Scholar
Constable, G. (eds.), Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 201–25Google Scholar
Rouse, , Authentic Witnesses. Approaches to Medieval Texts and Manuscripts (University of Notre Dame Press, 1991), pp. 191–219Google Scholar
Rouse, M. A., ‘The Verbal Concordance to the Scriptures’, Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 44 (1974), 5–30Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, A., ‘L’esegesi della scuola domenicana del secolo XIII’, in G. Cremascoli and C. Leonardi (eds.), La Bibbia nel Medioevo (Bologna: Editioni Dehoniane, 1996), pp. 291–304Google Scholar
Lerner, R. E., ‘Poverty, Preaching, and Eschatology in the Revelation Commentaries of “Hugh of St. Cher”’, in K. Walsh and D. Wood (eds.), The Bible in the Medieval World. Essays in Memory of Beryl Smalley, Studies in Church History, Subsidia 4 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), pp. 157–89Google Scholar
Fries, A., ‘Die Entstehungzeit der Bibelkommentare Alberts des Grossen’, in G. Meyer and A. Zimmermann (eds.), Albertus Magnus, doctor universalis, 1280–1980 (Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald, 1980), pp. 119–39Google Scholar
Santi, F., ‘L’esegesi biblica di Tommaso d’Aquino nel contesto dell’esegesi biblica medievale’, Angelicum 71 (1994), 509–35Google Scholar
Mailhiot, M.-D., ‘La pensée de saint Thomas sur le sens spirituel’, Revue Thomiste 59 (1959), 613–63Google Scholar
Aillet, M., Lire la Bible avec S. Thomas. Le passage de la littera à la res dans la Somme théologique (Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires, 1993)Google Scholar
Rouse, M. A., ‘Biblical Distinctiones in the Thirteenth Century’, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 41 (1974), 27–37Google Scholar
Magistri Petri Lombardi…Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, ed. Brady, I. F., 2 vols. (Grottaferrata [Rome]: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas, 1971)Google Scholar
Häring, N. M., ‘Notes on the Council and Consistory of Rheims (1148)’, Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966), 39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinhans, A., ‘De studio sacrae Scripturae in ordine Fratrum Minorum s. XIII’, Antonianum 7 (1932), 413–40Google Scholar
Brady, I., ‘Sacred Scripture in the Early Franciscan School’, in La Sacra Scrittura e i Francescani, Studium Biblicum Franciscanum 11 (Rome: Editiones Antonianum, 1973), pp. 65–82Google Scholar
Rahner, K., ‘La doctrine des “sens spirituels” au moyen âge en particulier chez saint Bonaventure’, Revue d’Ascétique et de Mystique 14 (1933), 263–99Google Scholar
Reist, T., Saint Bonaventure as a Biblical Commentator (New York: Lanham, 1985)Google Scholar
Burr, D., ‘Franciscan Exegesis and Francis as Apocalyptic Figure’, in E. B. King, J. T. Schaefer and W. B. Wadley (eds.), Monks, Nuns, and Friars in Mediaeval Society (Sewanee, TN: University of the South, 1989), pp. 51–62Google Scholar
Tolan, J. V. (ed.), Medieval Christian Perceptions of Islam (New York: Garland, 1996), pp. 131–52Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘Franciscan Learning. University Education and Biblical Exegesis’, in M. F. Cusato and G. Geltner (eds.), Defenders and Critics of Franciscan Life. Essays in Honor of John V. Fleming (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009), pp. 55–64Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Glossa continua super Evangelia (Catena aurea), ed. A. Guarienti, 2 vols. (Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1953)Google Scholar
Koch, J., ‘Der Prozess gegen die Postille Olivis zur Apokalypse’, RTAM 5 (1933), 302–15Google Scholar
Burr, D., ‘Olivi, the Lectura super Apocalypsim and Franciscan Exegetical Tradition’, in Francescanesimo e cultura universitaria (Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, Centro di Studi Francescani, 1990), pp. 113–35Google Scholar
Emmerson, R. K. and McGinn, B. (eds.), The Apocalypse in the Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992), pp. 89–102Google Scholar
Lerner, R. (ed.), Neue Richtungen in der hoch- und spätmittelalterlichen Bibelexegese, Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 32 (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1996), pp. 149–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter of John Olivi on the Bible. Principia quinque in sacram scripturam. Postilla in Isaiam et in I ad Corinthios, ed. Flood, D. and Gál, G. (St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1997)Google Scholar
Bataillon, L. J., ‘Olivi utilisateur de la Catena Aurea de Thomas d’Aquin’, and G. Dahan, ‘L’exégèse des livres prophetiques chez Pierre de Jean Olivi’, in A. Boureau and S. Piron (eds.), Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298). Pensée scolastique, dissidence spirituelle et société (Paris: Vrin, 1999), pp. 115–20 and 91–114, respectivelyGoogle Scholar
Douie, D. L., ‘Olivi's Postilla super Matthaeum’, Franciscan Studies 35 (1975), 66–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, K., Olivi and the Interpretation of Matthew in the High Middle Ages (University of Notre Dame Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Smalley, B., ‘Problems of Exegesis in the Fourteenth Century’, in P. Wilpert and W. P. Eckert (eds.), Antike und Orient im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 1 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1962), pp. 266–74Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘The Bible in the Fourteenth Century. Some Observations’, Church History 54 (1985), 176–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aureoli, OFM Petrus, Compendium sensus litteralis totius divinae scripturae, ed. P. Seeböck (Florence: Collegium S. Bonaventura, 1896)Google Scholar
Smalley, B., ‘Jean de Hesdin O. Hosp. S. Ioh.’, RTAM 28 (1961), 283–330Google Scholar
Trapp, D., ‘Augustinian Theology of the 14th Century’, Augustiniana 6 (1956), 146–274Google Scholar
Genest, J.-F., ‘Contingence et révélation des futurs: la Quaestio biblica de Richard FitzRalph,’ in J. Jolivet, Z. Kaluza and A. de Libera (eds.), Lectionum varietates. Hommage à Paul Vignaux (1904–1987) (Paris: Vrin, 1991), pp. 195–246Google Scholar
Minnis, A., ‘“Authorial Intention” and “Literal Sense” in the Exegetical Theories of Richard FitzRalph and John Wyclif’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section C 75 (1975), 1–30Google Scholar
Statuta antiqua universitatis Oxoniensis, ed. Gibson, S. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1931), p. 50Google Scholar
The Original Statutes of Cambridge University, ed. Hackett, M. B. (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Langlois, C.-V., ‘Nicolas de Lyre, frère Mineur’, Histoire Littéraire de la France 36 (Paris: Osmont, 1927), 355–400Google Scholar
Krey, P. D. W., ‘Many Leaders but Few Followers. The Fate of Nicholas of Lyra's Apocalypse Commentary in the Hands of his Late-Medieval Admirers’, Church History 64 (1995), 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krey, P. D. W., Nicholas of Lyra's Apocalypse Commentary (Kalamazoo, MI: MIP, 1997)Google Scholar
Smith, L. (eds.), Nicholas of Lyra. The Senses of Scripture, Studies in the History of Christian Thought 90 (Leiden: Brill, 2000)Google Scholar
de Hamel, C. F. R., Glossed Books of the Bible and the Origins of the Paris Booktrade (Woodbridge: Brewer, 1984)Google Scholar
Rosenthal, F., ‘Heinrich von Oyta and Biblical Criticism in the Fourteenth Century’, Speculum 25 (1950), 178–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steneck, N., Science and Creation in the Middle Ages. Henry of Langenstein on Genesis (University of Notre Dame Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Froehlich, K., ‘“Always to Keep to the Literal Sense Means to Kill One's Soul”. The State of Biblical Hermeneutics at the Beginning of the Fifteenth Century’, in E. Miner (ed.), Literary Uses of Typology from the Late Middle Ages to the Present (PrincetonUniversity Press, 1977), pp. 20–48Google Scholar
Froehlich, K., ‘Johannes Trithemius on the Fourfold Sense of Scripture’, in R. A. Muller and J. L. Thompson (eds.), Biblical Interpretation in the Era of the Reformation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), pp. 23–60Google Scholar
Maier, A., ‘Der Kommentar Benedikts XII. zum Matthaeus-Evangelium’, Archivum Pontificum Historicum 6 (1968), 398–405Google Scholar
her Ausgehendes Mittelalter. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Geistesgeschichte des 14. Jahrhunderts, vol. iii (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1977), pp. 591–600

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×