Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:25:51.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Shared Decision Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Neha S. Dangayach
Edited by
David M. Greer  and
Neha S. Dangayach
David M. Greer
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center
Neha S. Dangayach
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai Health System
Get access

Summary

Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process that allows patients, or their surrogates, and clinicians to make healthcare decisions together, taking into account the best scientific evidence available, as well as the patient’s values, goals, and preferences. This definition of SDM proposed by the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation [1] was endorsed by the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) (Figure 1.1). Informed medical decision making may be used synonymously with SDM.[2] Critically ill patients may be too unstable or otherwise incapacitated (e.g., due to intubation, sedation), and may not be able to speak for themselves.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neuroprognostication in Critical Care , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Informed Medical Decision Foundation. Healthwise. Available from: www.healthwise.org/specialpages/imdf.aspxGoogle Scholar
McNutt, RA. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA. 2004; 292:2516–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, X, Robinson, J, Muehlschlegel, S, et al. Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(1):131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J, Wendler, D. Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(9):723–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, GA, Fagerlin, A. Shared decision making state of the science. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(2):328–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafir, A, Rosenthal, J. Shared decision making: advancing patient-centered care through state and federal implementation. National Academy for State Health Policy. Open J Nurs. 2012;7(7).Google Scholar
Légaré, F, Witteman, HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kon, AA, Davidson, JE, Morrison, W, Danis, M, White, DB. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frosch, DL, Moulton, BW, Wexler, RM, et al. Shared decision making in the United States: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):305–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, AE, Sahetya, SK, Needham, DM. Aligning critical care interventions with patient goals: a modified Delphi study. Heart Lung J Acute Crit Care. 2016;45(6):517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, ND, Mullan, RJ, Breslin, M, et al. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications. Med Care. 2010;48(6 Suppl):S153–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwyn, G, Frosch, D, Thomson, R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacy, D, Légaré, F, Lewis, K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD001431.Google Scholar
Davidson, JE, Powers, K, Hedayat, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, JE, Aslakson, RA, Long, AC, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(1):103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piscitello, GM, Parham, WM, Huber, MT, Siegler, M, Parker, WF. The timing of family meetings in the medical intensive care unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2019;36(12):1049–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, M, Ratner, E, McCreedy, E, Shippee, N, Kane, RL. Decision aids for advance care planning: an overview of the state of the science. Ann Inter Med. 2014;161(6):408–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, CA, Mohottige, D, Sudore, RL, Smith, AK, Hanson, LC. Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1213–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, C, Leggett, S, Lloyd, B, et al. Decision aids for respite service choices by carers of people with dementia: development and pilot RCT. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(1):21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krones, T, Budilivschi, A, Karzig, I, et al. Advance care planning for the severely ill in the hospital: a randomized trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019;12(e3):e411–e423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaisance, A, Witteman, HO, LeBlanc, A, et al. Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, LC, Carey, TS, Caprio, AJ, et al. Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(11):2009–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volandes, AE, Ferguson, LA, Davis, AD, et al. Assessing end-of-life preferences for advanced dementia in rural patients using an educational video: A randomized controlled trial. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(2):169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muehlschlegel, S, Shutter, L, Col, N, Goldberg, R. Decision aids and shared decision-making in neurocritical care: an unmet need in our neuroICUs. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(1):127–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muehlschlegel, S, Hwang, DY, Flahive, J, et al. Goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients with TBI: development and feasibility testing. Neurology. 2020;95(2):e179–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, DB, Engelberg, RA, Wenrich, MD, Lo, B, Curtis, JR. Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):442–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, DB, Ernecoff, N, Buddadhumaruk, P, et al. Prevalence of and factors related to discordance about prognosis between physicians and surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2086–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, DB, Braddock, CH, Bereknyei, S, Curtis, JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):461–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson, W, Kao, A, Kuby, A, Thisted, RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6): 531–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauke, D, Reiter-theil, S, Hoster, E, Hiddemann, W, Winkler, EC. The role of relatives in decisions concerning life-prolonging treatment in patients with end-stage malignant disorders: informants, advocates or surrogate decision-makers? Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2667–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pochard, F, Azoulay, E, Chevret, S, et al. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(10):1893–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajizadeh, N, Uhler, L, Herman, SW, Lester, J. is shared decision making for end-of-life decisions associated with better outcomes as compared to other forms of decision making? A systematic literature review. MDM Policy Pract. 2016;1(1):238146831664223.Google ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, JC, Newman, J, Zhao, S, Johnston, SC. Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1130–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazaridis, C. Deciding under uncertainty: the case of refractory intracranial hypertension. Front Neurol. 2020;11:908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazaridis, C. End-of-life considerations and shared decision making in neurocritical care. Contin Lifelong Learn Neurol. 2018;24(6):1794–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guengerich, T. Caregiving and End-of-Life Issues: A Survey of AARP Members in Florida. Washington, DC: AARP; February 2009. Available from: https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/fl_eol_08.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hwang, D, Yagoda, D, Perrey, H, et al. Consistency of communication among intensive care unit staff as perceived by family members of patients surviving to discharge. J Crit Care. 2014;29(1):134–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, L, Douglas, JM, Bigby, C. “I’ve never been a yes person”: decision-making participation and self-conceptualization after severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(22):2250–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, B, Clark, L, Cook, P. Surrogate decision making for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Nurs. 2011;18(4):204–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazaridis, C. What does it mean to neuro-prognosticate? AJOB Neurosci. 2016;7:48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijck, JTJM, Bartels, RHMA, Lavrijsen, JCM, et al. The patient with severe traumatic brain injury: clinical decision-making: the first 60 min and beyond. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 25:622–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunneman, M, Branda, ME, Hargraves, IG, et al. Assessment of shared decision-making for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(9):1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, RG, Arnold, RM, Creutzfeldt, CJ, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1887–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You, JJ, Jayaraman, D, Swinton, M, Jiang, X, Heyland, DK. Supporting shared decision-making about cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a video-based decision-support intervention in a hospital setting: a multisite before–after pilot study. CMAJ Open. 2019;7(4):E630–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, WE, Hess, RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Oliveira Manoel, AL, Goffi, A, Marotta, TR, et al. The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage. Crit Care. 2016;20:21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naval, NS, Chang, T, Caserta, F, et al. Improved aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes: a comparison of 2 decades at an academic center. J Crit Care. 2013;28(2):182–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×