Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T11:06:47.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Trust and Psychology

Psychological Theories and Principles Underlying Interpersonal Trust

from Part I - Fundamental Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

By
Jeffry A. Simpson  and
Grace Vieth
Edited by
Frank Krueger
Frank Krueger
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

The development of trust is a prerequisite to forming and maintaining stable, satisfying relationships across the lifespan. Several major theories within psychology, including attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969) and Erikson’s (1963) theory of psychosocial development, are based on the premise that experiencing higher levels of trust with close others, particularly early in life, can lay the groundwork for happier, better functioning relationships in adulthood. In this chapter, we first review major several theoretical accounts of interpersonal trust in the field of psychology and identify some of the key principles that provide an understanding of trust. We then describe a dyadic model of trust informed by these theories that integrates many of these principles. Following this, we provide a representative overview of recent research on trust within the field of psychology, showing how trust operates in different types of relationships. We conclude the chapter by suggesting some directions in which future research on trust might head.

Keywords

interpersonal trusttrustworthinessinterdependencediagnostic testsfelt security
Type
Chapter
Information
The Neurobiology of Trust , pp. 15 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brion, S., Lount, R. B., & Doyle, S. P. (2015). Knowing if you are trusted: Does meta-accuracy promote trust development? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615590200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511Google Scholar
Buyukcan‐Tetik, A., Finkenauer, C., Siersema, M., Vander Heyden, K., & Krabbendam, L. (2015). Social relations model analyses of perceived self‐control and trust in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12154Google Scholar
Campagna, R. L., Dirks, K. T., Knight, A. P., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2020). On the relation between felt trust and actual trust: Examining pathways to and implications of leader trust meta-accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(9), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Rubin, H. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019714Google Scholar
Carter, N. L., & Weber, J. M. (2010). Not pollyannas: Higher generalized trust predicts lie detection ability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609360261Google Scholar
Cortes, K., & Wood, J. V. (2019). How was your day? Conveying care, but under the radar, for people lower in trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.003Google Scholar
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations (pp. 88–114). John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255Google Scholar
Eibach, R. P., & Mock, S. E. (2011). The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents’ risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 694–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. W. W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Fonseca, M. A., & Peters, K. (2018). Will any gossip do? Gossip does not need to be perfectly accurate to promote trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.015Google Scholar
Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002Google Scholar
Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2019). Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: A cross country panel analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0021-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B., & Zednik, A. (2019). Trust and age: An experiment with current and former students. Economics Letters, 181, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.004Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2003). Gaming trust. In Ostrom, E. & Walker, J. (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 80–101). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In Lerner, M. J. & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 261–284). Plenum.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.Google Scholar
Kille, D. R., Eibach, R. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Who can’t take a compliment? The role of construal level and self-esteem in accepting positive feedback from close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.003Google Scholar
Kim, J. S., Weisberg, Y. J., Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., Farrell, A. K., & Johnson, W. F. (2015). Ruining it for both of us: The disruptive role of low-trust partners on conflict resolution in romantic relationships. Social Cognition, 33(5), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.520Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (2001). Trust and intergroup negotiation. In Brown, R. & Gaertner, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 431–450). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self‐evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1861Google Scholar
Luchies, L. B., Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., et al. (2013). Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031054Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. H., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Dispositional pathways to trust: Self-esteem and agreeableness interact to predict trust and negative emotional disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000093Google Scholar
Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002Google Scholar
Molden, D. C., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.014Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Pinkus, R. T., Holmes, J. G., et al. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies of interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saef, R. M., Porter, C. M., Woo, S. E., & Wiese, C. (2019). Getting off on the right foot: The role of openness to experience in fostering initial trust between culturally dissimilar partners. Journal of Research in Psychology, 79, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.003Google Scholar
Shallcross, S. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2012). Trust and responsiveness in strain-test situations: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026829Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587–607). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2016). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 91–116). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stamos, A., Altsitsiadis, E., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust: Lower childhood socioeconomic status predict lower levels of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Kuile, H., Kluwer, E. S., Finkenauer, C., & Van der Lippe, T. (2017). Predicting adaptation to parenthood: The role of responsiveness, gratitude, and trust. Personal Relationship, 24, 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.Google Scholar
Uysal, A., Lin, H. L., & Bush, A. L. (2012). The reciprocal cycle of self‐concealment and trust in romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1904Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414552473Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., & Posthuma, D. (2014). Genetic influences are virtually absent for trust. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93880. https://10.1371/journal.pone.0093880Google Scholar
Yucel, D. (2013). Number of siblings and generalized trust. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(8), 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. J. (2019). I may not agree with you, but I trust you: Caring about social issues signals integrity. Psychological Science, 30(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619837948CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×