Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Semantic Memory: Building Models from Lesions
- Part II Insights from Electrophysiology
- Part III Applications of Models to Understanding Cognitive Dysfunction
- Part IV Representations of Nouns and Verbs vs. Objects and Actions
- Part V Critical Role of Subcortical Nuclei in Semantic Functions
- Part VI Conceptual Models of Semantics
- Part 10 Process and content in semantic memory
- 11 The conceptual structure account: A cognitive model of semantic memory and its neural instantiation
- 12 Neural foundations for conceptual representations: Evidence from functional brain imaging
- 13 Neural hybrid model of semantic object memory (version 1.1)
- Index
- References
Part 10 - Process and content in semantic memory
from Part VI - Conceptual Models of Semantics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Semantic Memory: Building Models from Lesions
- Part II Insights from Electrophysiology
- Part III Applications of Models to Understanding Cognitive Dysfunction
- Part IV Representations of Nouns and Verbs vs. Objects and Actions
- Part V Critical Role of Subcortical Nuclei in Semantic Functions
- Part VI Conceptual Models of Semantics
- Part 10 Process and content in semantic memory
- 11 The conceptual structure account: A cognitive model of semantic memory and its neural instantiation
- 12 Neural foundations for conceptual representations: Evidence from functional brain imaging
- 13 Neural hybrid model of semantic object memory (version 1.1)
- Index
- References
Summary
To identify something is to group it with like objects called by the same name; that is, to place it in a category. This process begins in our earliest days of acquiring language: the toddler who learns that his spherical rubber toy is a “ball” will spontaneously use that same word for striped beach balls and fuzzy tennis balls. Categorization allows us to make assumptions about an object at hand based on experience with related ones; without this capacity we would be first-time visitors to our own planet with every new experience, unable to understand our surroundings. Hence categorization is essential to the organization of semantic memory, that is, our long-term representation of meaningful non-episodic information.
How does categorization take place? Semantic content knowledge (e.g. appearance, specific features, and functions) and ability to process that knowledge (e.g. select appropriate features and make comparisons) are both necessary. Consider this scenario: someone describes a 45-year-old female traffic cop who strictly disciplines her grandchild as “not what one usually thinks of as a grandmother.” Presumably the speaker is referring to characteristics commonly associated with grandmothers, e.g. being elderly, sedentary, sweet-natured, and eager to spoil their grandchildren. Of course, the speaker also knows that what qualifies someone as a grandmother is being a mother of a parent, age, appearance, and lifestyle notwithstanding. This scenario illustrates two primary categorization processes: similarity-based and rule-based (Smith et al., 1998).
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Neural Basis of Semantic Memory , pp. 247 - 264Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
and (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105: 442–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (1998). Object and action naming in Alzheimer's disease and Fronto-temporal dementia. Neurology, 50: 351–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). The interpretation of semantic category-specific deficits: what do they reveal about the organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain?Neurocase, 4: 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1999) Sources of conceptual change. In (ed.), Conceptual Development: Piaget's Legacy, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 293–325.Google Scholar
and (1990). Semantic memory loss in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: what do the various measures measure?Brain, 113: 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). A computational model of semantic impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120: 339–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1975). “Mini Mental State.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12: 189–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (2001). Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13: 892–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1998). Category specific semantic loss in dementia of Alzheimer's type: functional–anatomic correlations from cross-sectional analyses. Brain, 121: 633–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (1997). Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Language, 57: 254–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1999). Relearning and subsequent forgetting of semantic category exemplars in a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 13: 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and (1996). Language comprehension difficulty in Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and fronto-temporal degeneration. Neurology, 47: 183–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (2003). Categorization of object descriptions in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia: limitation in rule-based processing. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(2): 120–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning?Cognitive Psychology, 45: 482–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 169–81.Google ScholarPubMed
, , , , , , , and (2005). The neural basis for novel semantic categorization. NeuroImage, 24: 369–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2006). Semantic categorisation of novel objects in frontotemporal dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 23: 541–62.CrossRef
Koenig, P., Smith, E. E., Moore, P., Glosser, G., and Grossman, M. (2007). Categorization of novel animals by patients with Alzheimer's disease and corticobasal degeneration. Neuropsychology.CrossRef
, , and (2003). Distinctive neuropsychological patterns of frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 16: 211–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Executive function deficits in mild Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 9: 313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2001). No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13: 341–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libon, D. J., Xie, S. X., Moore, P., Farmer, J., Antani, S., McCawley, G., Cross, K., and Grossman, M. (2007). Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia: A factor analytic study.
, , and (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1013: 333–52.Google Scholar
and (1978). A context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85: 207–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1995). The naming impairment of living and nonliving items in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2000). A progressive category-specific deficit for non-living things. Neuropsychologia, 38: 60–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1977). Stimulus preference and memory factors in Korsakoff 's syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 15 (1): 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2001). PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1: 360–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1996). Executive functions and Alzheimer's disease: problems and prospects. European Journal of Neurology, 3: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer's disease: a critical review. Brain, 122: 383–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1998). Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95: 747–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In and (eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111: 205–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1991). Dissociation between living and nonliving things in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology, 41: 545–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998). Similarity as an explanatory construct. Cognition, 65: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization. Memory and Cognition, 22: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition, 65: 167–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27: 635–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 10
- Cited by