Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T22:13:10.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Threat assessment, the state, and foreign policy: a neoclassical realist model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Steven E. Lobell
Edited by
Steven E. Lobell ,
Norrin M. Ripsman  and
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

How do states perceive international threats? Which domestic actors are the most important in threat definition? What happens when domestic actors and interests disagree on the nature of threats? As we state in chapter 1, these are central questions to the neoclassical realist agenda and require a theory of the state to answer. In this chapter I will develop a neoclassical realist theory of threat assessment to fill this gap and illustrate it with reference to the British experience between the two world wars.

Neorealist theories are theories of international outcomes. They highlight the role of polarity and international structure, black box the state, and focus on shifts in aggregate military power or threat. Debates include whether bipolar or multipolar distributions of power are more war-prone; whether anarchy encourages states to maximize relative power or security; whether equal or unequal distributions of power contribute to war; and the prevalence of buck-passing or balancing against threats.

Proponents of balance of power theory and balance of threat theory would argue that prior to World War I Britain balanced against the rising power (or threat) of Wilhelmine Germany in the form of the Anglo-French Entente Cordiale, the Triple Entente, and the naval arms buildup. Granted, prior to 1914, balancing may not have happened in an optimal fashion. Balance of power theory and balance of threat theory, at least in their current forms, predict a general tendency toward balancing and do not expect an efficient or quick balancing process under all circumstances.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy , pp. 42 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979)Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System,” International Security 10, no. 4 (spring 1986), pp. 99–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layne, Christopher, “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States' Unipolar Moment,” International Security 31, no. 2 (fall 2006), pp. 7–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry, “European Union Security and Defense Policy: A Response to Unipolarity?” Security Studies 15, no. 2 (April–June 2006), pp. 149–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T.V., Wirtz, James J., and Fortmann, Michel, eds., Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004)
Walt, Stephen M., The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., “Neoclassical Realism: Psychology of Great Power Intervention,” in Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006), pp. 38–53Google Scholar
David, Steven R., “Explaining Third World Alignment,” World Politics 43, no. 2 (January 1991), pp. 233–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammad, “Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory Meets the Third World,” in Neuman, Stephanie G., ed., International Relations Theory and the Third World (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 31–54Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Power, Protection and Free Trade: International Sources of US Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin, Peacemaking by Democracies: Domestic Structure, Executive Autonomy and Peacemaking after Two World Wars (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and Ikenberry, G. John, “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4 (December 1989), pp. 457–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Gideon, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51, no. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L., The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905 (Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 1988), p. 7Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Kennedy's, PaulThe Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987)Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed, From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Lobell, Steven E., “The International Realm, Framing Effects, and Security Strategies: Britain in Peace and War,” International Interactions 32, no. 1 (2006), pp. 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Scott, “State-Centric Balance-of-Threat Theory: Explaining the Misunderstood Gulf Cooperation Council,” Security Studies 13, no. 2 (2003/4), pp. 306–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George, Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Brown, Carl L., International Politics and the Middle East: Old Rules, Dangerous Game (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30, no. 2 (January 1978), pp. 167–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evera, Stephen, Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Labs, Eric J., “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims,” Security Studies 6, no. 4 (summer 1997), pp. 1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Benjamin, When Opponents Cooperate: Great Power Conflict and Collaboration in World Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. and Lobell, Steven E., “Geo-structuralism and International Politics: The End of the Cold War and the Regionalisation of International Security,” in Lake, David and Morgan, Patrick M., eds., Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Seabury, Paul, ed., The Balance of Power (San Francisco: Chandler, 1965)
Wohlforth, William Curti, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security 24, no. 1 (1999), pp. 5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Benjamin, States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy (New York: W. W. Norton, 2005)Google Scholar
Binder, Leonard, “The Middle East as a Subordinate International System,” World Politics 10, no. 3 (April 1958), pp. 408–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Malcolm, The Arab Cold War: Gamal' Abd al-Nasir and his Rivals, 1958–1970 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Noble, Paul, “The Arab System: Pressure, Constraints, and Opportunities,” in Korany, Bahgat and Hillal Dessouki, Ali E., eds., The Foreign Policies of Arab States (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security 18, no. 3 (winter 1993/4), pp. 5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamath, P. M., “US–China Relations under the Clinton Administration: Comprehensive Engagement or the Cold War Again?” Strategic Analysis 22, no. 4 (1988), pp. 699–704Google Scholar
Jha, Prem Shankar, “Why India Went Nuclear,” World Affairs 2, no. 3 (1998), pp. 80–96Google Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammed, “The Third World in the System of States: Acute Schizophrenia or Growing Pains?” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 1 (1989), pp. 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. D., Politics: Who gets What, When, How (New York: Meridian Books, 1958)Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Jago, Charles, “Habsburg Absolutism and the Cortes of Castile,” American Historical Review 86 (1981), pp. 307–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, John H., Spain and its World, 1500–1700: Selected Essays (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Lynch, John, The Hispanic World in Crisis and Change, 1598–1700 (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992)Google Scholar
James, Scott C. and Lake, David A., “The Second Face of Hegemony: Britain's Repeal of the Corn Laws and the American Walker Tariff of 1846,” International Organization 43, no. 1 (1989), pp. 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelal, Rawi and Kirshner, Jonathan, “Strategy, Economic Relations, and the Definition of National Interests,” Security Studies 9, no. 1 (1999–2000), pp. 119–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, John M., “Transnational Liberalism and US Primacy,” International Security 26, no. 3 (winter 2001/2), pp. 117–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games,” International Organization 42, no. 3 (1988), pp. 454–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew and Peterson, Susan, “Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change,” British Journal of Political Science 29, no. 2 (1999), pp. 177–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, C. A., “Economic Appeasement and the German ‘Moderates’ 1937–1939. An Introductory Essay,” Past and Present 56 (1972), pp. 105–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Scott, Profits of Peace: The Political Economy of Anglo-German Appeasement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoichi, Kibata, “Anglo-Japanese Relations from the Manchurian Incident to Pearl Harbor: Missed Opportunities,” in Nish, Ian and Kibata, Yoichi, eds., The History of Anglo-Japanese Relations, 1600–2000 (London: Macmillan, 2000)
Lobell, Steven E., “The Second Face of Security: Britain's ‘Smart’ Appeasement Policy towards Japan and Germany,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 1 (2007), pp. 73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Michael, “After Non-Detection, What? What Iraq's Unfound WMD Mean for the Future of Non-Proliferation,” in Walker, Graham F., ed., The Search for WMD: Non-Proliferation, Intelligence, and Pre-emption in the New Security Environment (Halifax, Nova Scotia: Centre for Foreign Policy Studies, 2006)Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William Curti, The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Spiegel, Steven, Dominance and Diversity: The International Hierarchy (Boston: Little Brown, 1972)Google Scholar
Akita, Shigeru, “‘Gentlemanly Capitalism,’ Inter-Asian Trade and Japanese Industrialisation at the Turn of the Last Century,” Japan Forum 8, no. 1 (1996), p. 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Sir Fred, The Anglo-Japanese Financial Relations (London: Basil Blackwell, 1991)Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964)Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “Hypotheses on Misperception,” World Politics 20, no. 3 (April 1968), p. 472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skålnes, Lars S., Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy: Foreign Economic Policies as Strategic Instruments (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey A., “Sectoral Conflict and US Foreign Economic Policy, 1914–1940,” International Organization 42, no. 1 (winter 1988), pp. 59–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O., Building the Cold War Consensus: The Political Economy of US National Security Policy, 1949–51 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V., eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRef
Solingen, Etel, Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Lobell, Steven E., The Challenge of Hegemony: Grand Strategy, Trade, and Domestic Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narizny, Kevin, The Political Economy of Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter, Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter, Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Nolt, James H., “Business Conflict and the Demise of Imperialism,” in Skidmore, David, ed., Contested Social Orders and International Politics (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Cain, Peter J. and Hopkins, Anthony G., British Imperialism: Crisis and Deconstruction, 1914–1990 (London: Longman, 1993)Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur, The Rise and the Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack L., Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., “Analyzing US Grand Strategy,” International Security 14, no. 1 (1989), p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard and Stein, Arthur A., eds., “Beyond Realism: The Study of Grand Strategy,” in The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Haas, Mark L., The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789–1989 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Organski's, A.F.K.World Politics, 2nd edn (New York: Knopf, 1968)Google Scholar
Gilpin's, RobertWar and Change in World Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Dale, The Origins of Major War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (1997), pp. 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles, The Vulnerability of Empire (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., “Theories of Crisis Decision-making,” in Lauren, Paul Gordon, ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1979), pp. 99–136Google Scholar
Trotter, Ann, Britain and East Asia: 1933–1937 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Papayoanou, Paul A., Power Ties: Economic Interdependence, Balancing, and War (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeff, “Sectoral Conflict and Foreign Economic Policy, 1914–1940,” International Organization 42, no. 1 (winter 1988), p. 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shay, Jr. Robert Paul, British Rearmament in the Thirties: Politics and Profits (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Peden, G.C., British Rearmament and the Treasury: 1932–1939 (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Wurn, Clemens A., Business, Politics, and International Relations: Steel, Cotton, and International Cartels in British Politics, 1924–1939, trans. Salmon, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Peden, G. C., “A Matter of Timing: The Economic Background to British Foreign Policy, 1937–1939,” History 69, no. 225 (February 1984), p. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Neil, “London Banks, the German Standstill Agreements and ‘Economic Appeasement’ in the 1930s,” Economic History Review 40, no. 4 (1987), pp. 571–87Google Scholar
Newton, Scott, “The ‘Anglo-German Connection’ and the Political Economy of Appeasement,” Diplomacy and Statecraft 2 (1991), p. 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Paul, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870–1945 (London: Allen and Unwin, 1983)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gustav, The Politics and Economics of Appeasement: British Foreign Policy in the 1930s (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing,” International Security 29, no. 2 (2004), pp. 159–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambelet, John C., “The Anglo-German Dreadnought Race, 1905–1914,” Papers of the Peace Science Society 22 (1974), pp. 1–45Google Scholar
Williams, Rhodri, Defending the Empire: The Conservative Party and British Defence Policy 1899–1915 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Read, Donald, ed., Edwardian England (London: Croom Helm, 1982)
Marder, Arthur J., The Anatomy of British Sea Power: A History of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1940)Google Scholar
Sumida, Jon Tetsuro, In Defence of Naval Supremacy: Finance, Technology, and British Naval Policy, 1889–1914 (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989)Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard and Stein, Arthur A., eds., The Domestic Basis of Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)
Emy, Hugh V., “The Impact of Financial Policy on English Party Politics before 1914,” Historical Journal 15, no. 1 (1972), pp. 122–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peden, G.C., British Economic and Social Policy: Lloyd George to Margaret Thatcher (New York: Philip Allan, 1991)Google Scholar
Murray, Bruce, The People's Budget of 1909/10: Lloyd George and Liberal Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall, The Cash Nexus (New York: Basic Books, 2001)Google Scholar
French, David, British Economic and Strategic Planning, 1905–1915 (Boston: George Allen and Unwin, 1982)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×