Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811869.008

8 - Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Randall L. Schweller

Edited by

Steven E. Lobell ,

Norrin M. Ripsman and

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro

Show author details

Randall L. Schweller: Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Steven E. Lobell: Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman: Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro: Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In chapter 1, Jeffrey Taliaferro, Steven Lobell, and Norrin Ripsman posed three questions about the politics of resource extraction and domestic mobilization in grand strategy: How do states mobilize the resources necessary to pursue their chosen security policies? How much power do domestic actors have to obstruct the state when it seeks to mobilize resources in different settings? Finally, what determines who is more successful in bargaining games between the state and societal groups? In this chapter, I address those questions as they pertain to variations in the ability of great powers to mobilize the resources required to pursue expansionist grand strategies, specifically bids for regional hegemony. I present a neoclassical realist theory to explain the puzzle of under-expansion and under-aggression: the suboptimal reluctance to use force or to build up military power in pursuit of profit or security or both. Neoclassical realism can explain why only certain great powers could make bids for regional hegemony in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In brief, I make the controversial argument that a particular type of ideology – fascism – enabled the leaders of Nazi Germany (and to a lesser extent Italy and Japan) to extract the resources and mobilize the domestic support necessary to undertake a sustained hegemonic bid.

This chapter consists of four sections: the first discusses how and why the puzzle of under-expansion and under-aggression arises.

Type: Chapter
Information: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy , pp. 227 - 250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811869.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Schweller, Randall L., Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar

Herbst, Jeffrey, “War and the State in Africa,” International Security 14, no. 4 (spring 1990), pp. 117–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Holsti, K. J., “International Relations Theory and Domestic War in the Third World: The Limits of Relevance,” in Neuman, Stephanie G., ed., International Relations Theory and the Third World (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Segal, Gerald, “Does China Matter?” Foreign Affairs 78, no. 5 (September/October 1999), p. 28CrossRef Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen, “Primed for Peace: Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15, no. 3 (winter 1990–1), pp. 7–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Liberman, PeterDoes Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, Colossus: The Price of America's Empire (New York: Penguin Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Blainey, Geoffrey, The Causes of War (New York: The Free Press, 1973)CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, Michael, Fascists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Nolte, Ernst, Three Faces of Fascism, trans. Vennewitz, Leila (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965)Google Scholar

Trevor-Roper, H. R., “The Phenomenon of Fascism,” in Woolf, S. J., ed., Fascism in Europe (London: Methuen, 1981)Google Scholar

Payne, Stanley, Fascism: Comparison and Definition (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1980)Google Scholar

Payne, , A History of Fascism: 1914–1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1995)Google Scholar

Paxton, Robert O., The Anatomy of Fascism (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004)Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Gilpin, , “No One Loves a Political Realist,” Security Studies 5, no. 3 (spring 1996), pp. 3–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. and Priess, David, “A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate,” Mershon International Studies Review 41, Supplement 1 (May 1997), pp. 1–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51, no. 4 (autumn 1997), pp. 513–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey W.Moravcsik, Andrew, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (fall 1999), pp. 5–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and US Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Mosse, George L., The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich (New York: Howard Fertig, [1964] 1998)Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L., “Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict over Scarce Resources,” in Mastanduno, Michael and Kapstein, Ethan B., eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Thucydides, , The Peloponnesian War, trans. Crawley, Richard (New York: The Modern Library, 1934)Google Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Harper and Row, [1939] 1964)Google Scholar

Thurlow, Richard, Fascism in Britain: From Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts to the National Front (New York: I. B. Tauris, 1998)Google Scholar

Benewick, Robert, The Fascist Movement in Britain (London: Allen Lane, Penguin, 1972)Google Scholar

Thomson, A. Raven, The Coming Corporate State (London: Greater Britain Publications, 1937)Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press, [1945], 1980)Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, US Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987)CrossRef Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30, no. 2 (April 2004), pp. 289–316CrossRef Google Scholar

Neumann, Franz, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1944)Google Scholar

Stevenson, John and Cook, Chris, Britain in the Depression: Society and Politics, 1929–1939 (London: Longmans, 1994)Google Scholar

Slouka, Mark, “Quitting the Paint Factory: On the Virtues of Idleness,” Harper's Magazine 309, no. 1854 (November 2004), pp. 57–65 at p. 65Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1927] 1996)Google Scholar

Mosse, George L., The Culture of Western Europe: The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, 3rd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988)Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946)Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19, no. 3 (winter 1994/5), pp. 5–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Shimko, Keith L., “Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism,” Review of Politics 54, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 281–301CrossRef Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966)Google Scholar