Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T07:12:47.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Neoclassical realism and identity: peril despite profit across the Taiwan Strait

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Jennifer Sterling-Folker
Edited by
Steven E. Lobell ,
Norrin M. Ripsman  and
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Jennifer Sterling-Folker
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The introductory chapter of this volume by Jeffrey Taliaferro, Steven Lobell, and Norrin Ripsman suggests that neoclassical realism can add explanatory power to structural realism by considering the effect of the domestic political environment on policy. It also improves on liberal theories by asserting the primacy of international constraints. In this chapter, I examine whether a neoclassical realist approach can explain a liberal puzzle, namely the persistence of security competition between trade partners and the absence of peace dividends between economically interdependent states. In other words, why do states continue to perceive each other as security threats despite increased economic interdependence between them? How is it possible for states that are engaged in an active security conflict to continue trading with one another? Why does the purported peace dividend of economic interdependence so often fail to materialize?

That there should be a peace dividend is an assumption with deep philosophical roots. It is an assumption that has served as the analytical bedrock for a variety of liberal theoretical projects in the international relations discipline, and it continues to inform foreign policy and decision-making throughout the globe. The result is, as Katherine Barbieri and Gerald Schneider note, that “most leaders still cling to the longstanding belief that expanding economic ties will cement the bonds of friendship between and within nations that make the resort to arms unfathomable,” and “few scholars today question the belief that trade brings universal benefits and peace under all conceivable conditions.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy , pp. 99 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barbieri, Katherine and Schneider, Gerald, “Globalization and Peace: Assessing New Directions in the Study of Trade and Conflict,” Journal of Peace Research 36, no. 4 (July 1999), pp. 387–404, at pp. 387 and 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine, The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine, “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research 33, no. 1 (February 1996), pp. 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine and Levy, Jack S., “Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade,” Journal of Peace Research 36, no. 4 (July 1999), pp. 463–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J., “Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-national Evidence,” International Studies Quarterly 30, no. 1 (March 1986), pp. 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyung Min and Rousseau, David L., “The Classical Liberals Were Half Right (or Half Wrong): New Tests of the ‘Liberal Peace’, 1960–88,” Journal of Peace Research 42, no. 5 (September 2005), pp. 523–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R. and Russett, Bruce M., “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 2 (June 1997), pp. 267–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., Oneal, Frances H., Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce, “The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950–85,” Journal of Peace Research 33, no. 1 (February, 1996), pp. 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polachek, Solomon William, “Conflict and Trade,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (March 1980), pp. 55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine and Schneider, Gerald, “Globalization and Peace: Assessing New Directions in the Study of Trade and Conflict,” Journal of Peace Research 36, no. 4 (July 1999), pp. 387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: Norton, 1997)Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Pollins, Brian M., Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Pollins, Brian M., “The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45, no. 6 (December 2001), pp. 834–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, Susan M., “Interdependence and Conflict,” Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 1 (May 1997), pp. 33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Dale, “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations,” International Security 20, no. 4 (spring 1996), pp. 5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M. and Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., “Commercial Liberalism Under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936,” Security Studies 6, no. 2 (winter 1996/97), pp. 4–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne and Mansfield, Edward D., “Power Politics and International Trade,” American Political Science Review 87, no. 2 (June 1993), pp. 408–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M., Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19, no. 3 (winter 1994/5), pp. 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Steve, “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 1 (May 1997), pp. 59–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goenner, Cullen F., “Uncertainty of the Liberal Peace,” Journal of Peace Research 41, no. 5 (September 2004), pp. 589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. B., “The Definitions and Identification of Interdependence,” in Jones, R. J. B. and Willetts, P., eds., Interdependence on Trial: Studies in the Theory and Reality of Contemporary Interdependence (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Kastner, Scott L., “Does Economic Integration Across the Taiwan Strait Make Military Conflict Less Likely?” Journal of East Asian Studies 6, no. 3 (fall 2006), pp. 319–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, C., “Cognitive Factors in Explaining Regime Dynamics,” in Rittberger, V., ed., Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew A. G., “Coming in from the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions,” European Journal of International Relations 12, no. 2 (June 2006), pp. 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdela, Rawi, National Purpose in the World Economy: Post-Soviet States in Comparative Perspective (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric, “Denationalizing Money? Economic Liberalism and the ‘National Question’ in Currency Affairs,” in Gilbert, E. and Helleiner, Eric, eds., Nation-States and Money (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 139–58Google Scholar
Gelber, Harry G., Sovereignty Through Interdependence (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997)Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric, “Economic Nationalism as a Challenge to Economic Liberalism? Lessons From the 19th Century,” International Studies Quarterly 46, no. 3 (September 2002), pp. 307–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, George T., “Economic Nationalism: Bringing the Nation Back In,” Millennium 27, no. 1 (1998), pp. 55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, George T., “Imagining the Economic Nation: Globalisation in China,” New Political Economy 4, no. 2 (July 1999), pp. 215–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, Stephen, “Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration,” International Studies Quarterly 44, no. 3 (September 2000), pp. 365–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, “Taiwan's National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations,” Asian Survey 44, no. 4 (July/August 2004), pp. 484–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 25Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, [1977; reprint 1989]), p. viGoogle Scholar
Keohane, and Nye, , eds., Transnational Relations and World Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, Crawford, Beverly, and Donnelly, Jack, “Defining and Conceptualizing Progress in International Relations,” in Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, eds., Progress in Postwar International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Goldgeier, James M. and McFaul, Michael, “A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era,” International Organization 46, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 467–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “The Future of World Politics: Will it Resemble the Past?” International Security 16, no. 3 (1991/2), pp. 39–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World (New York: Basic Books, 1986)Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (New York: Routledge, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, Theories of International Cooperation and the Primacy of Anarchy: Explaining US International Monetary Policy-Making After Bretton Woods (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Papayoanou, Paul, Power Ties: Economic Interdependence, Balancing, and War (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., “Economic Integration and the Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States,” in Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen, eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Bearce, David H. and Omori, Sawa, “How Do Commercial Institutions Promote Peace?” Journal of Peace Research 42, no. 6 (November 2005), pp. 659–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C., “Identity and the Politics of Security,” European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2 (1998), pp. 204–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishai, Linda, “Liberal Empire,” Journal of International Relations and Development 7, no. 1 (April 2004), pp. 48–72, at p. 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wivel, Anders, “Explaining Why State X Made a Certain Move Last Tuesday: The Promise and Limitations of Realist Foreign Policy Analysis,” Journal of International Relations and Development 8, no. 4 (December 2005), pp. 355–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “No One Loves a Political Realist,” in Frankel, Benjamin, ed., Realism: Restatements and Renewal (London: Frank Cass, 1996)Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organization 49, no. 2 (spring 1995), pp. 229–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. and Priess, David, “A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate,” Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 1 (May 1997), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmer, Franke, The Social Construction of Man, the State, and War: Identity, Conflict, and Violence in the Former Yugoslavia (New York: Routledge, 2002), p. 69Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef, “Nationalism and Realist Discourses of International Relations,” in Beer, Francis A. and Hariman, Robert, eds., Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996), pp. 239–40.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W., Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Barrington, Lowell W., “‘Nation’ and ‘Nationalism’: The Misuse of Key Concepts in Political Science,” PS: Political Science and Politics 30, no. 4 (December 1997), pp. 712–16Google Scholar
Murphy, Alexander B., “The Sovereign State System as Political-Territorial Ideal: Historical and Contemporary Considerations,” in Biersteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 81–120Google Scholar
Croucher, Sheila L., “Perpetual Imagining: Nationhood in a Global Era,” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (March 2003), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, Jeffrey, “Global Realism: Unmasking Power in the International Political Economy,” in Jones, Richard Wyn, ed., Critical Theory and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 2001), pp. 120–1.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B., Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), p. 35.Google Scholar
Geisler, Michael E, National Symbols, Fractured Identities (Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J., Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946), p. 10.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization 42, no. 3 (summer 1988), pp. 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, “Identity and Conflict: Ties that Bind and Differences that Divide,” European Journal of International Relations 12, no. 1 (March 2006), pp. 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, Scott L., “Ambiguity, Economic Interdependence, and the US Strategic Dilemma in the Taiwan Strait,” Journal of Contemporary China 15, no. 49 (November 2006), pp. 651–69, at p. 666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copper, John F., Taiwan, 3rd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999), p. 168Google Scholar
Copper, John F., Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999), p. 168.Google Scholar
Dreyer, June Teufel, “Regional Security Issues,” Journal of International Affairs 49, no. 2 (winter 1996), pp. 391–411Google Scholar
Dikötter, Frank, “Culture, ‘Race’ and Nation: The Formation of National Identity in Twentieth Century China,” Journal of International Affairs 49, no. 2 (winter 1996), pp. 590–605Google Scholar
Dittmer, Lowell, “Taiwan as a Factor in China's Quest for National Identity,” Journal of Contemporary China 15, no. 49 (November 2006), pp. 671–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDevitt, Michael, “Taiwan: The Tail that Wags Dogs,” Asia Policy 1, no. 1 (January 2006), pp. 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John, Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations (New York: Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M., “Economic Interdependence, the Democratic State, and the Liberal Peace,” in Mansfield, Edward D. and Pollins, Brian M., eds., Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003), pp. 44–59Google Scholar
Keshk, Omar M. G., Pollins, Brian M., and Reuveny, Rafael, “Trade Still Follows the Flag: The Primacy of Politics in a Simultaneous Model of Interdependence and Armed Conflict,” Journal of Politics 66, no. 4 (November 2004), pp. 1155–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousseau, Michael, Hegre, Håvard, and Oneal, John R., “How the Wealth of Nations Conditions the Liberal Peace,” European Journal of International Relations 9, no. 2 (June 2003), pp. 277–314)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security 20, no. 1 (summer 1995), pp. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T. Y. and Liu, I-Chou, “Contending Identities in Taiwan: Implications for Cross-Strait Relations,” Asian Survey 44, no. 4 (July/August 2004), pp. 568–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Xiaokun, “Intellectual Discourses in the Taiwan Independence Movement,” in Coppieters, Bruno and Huysseune, Michel, eds., Secession, History and the Social Sciences (Brussels: Brussels University Press, 2002) p. 228.Google Scholar
Song, Xiaokun, “Intellectual Discourses in the Taiwan Independence Movement,” in Coppieters, Bruno and Huysseune, Michel, eds., Secession, History, and Social Sciences (Brussels: VUB Brussels University Press, 2002), pp. 220–47Google Scholar
Teng-hui, Lee, “Understanding Taiwan: Bridging the Perception Gap,” Foreign Affairs 78, no. 6 (November/December 1999), pp. 9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, Lowell, “Taiwan's Aim-Inhibited Quest for Identity and the China Factor,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 40, no. 1/2 (April 2005), pp. 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J., “Posing Problems Without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for US Security Policy,” International Security 25, no. 4 (spring 2001), pp. 5–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×