Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-px5tt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T04:57:25.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Natural Law and Rights

from Part I - Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2025

Eric R. Claeys
Eric R. Claeys
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Chapter 2 introduces the normative theory on which the book relies. Principles of natural law are guides for practical human action. The principles are “natural” because they are knowable through human reason and valid guides to action whether they have been accepted in any community’s laws. They are “law” in that they supply reasons or justifications for action. Natural law theory focuses human action on survival and on flourishing understood rationally. Natural law justifies reasoning with interests, understood as distinct components of a person’s well-being. Natural law also justifies reasoning with rights, understood as entitlements to act and be free from interference backed by claims against others. Natural rights focus social and political life on desirable, low, and uncontroversial goals like survival and freedom. Natural rights also help specialize – around distinct fields of human activity organized around people’s bodies, their capacities to make livings, their capacities to associate, and their capacities to use property.

Keywords

natural lawnatural rightsinterestrightcommon goodeudaimoneiaperfectionismconsequentialismdeontology
Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Property Rights , pp. 33 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ackerman, Bruce A. 1977. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2018. Property and Human Flourishing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Michael, Moore. 2016. “Deontological Ethics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/ (last accessed April 19, 2020).Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria. 2016. “Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta ed. (Winter 2016), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/ (last accessed April 19, 2022).Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1979. Restatement (Second) of Torts. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1995. Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Aquinas, Thomas. 1485/2023. Summa Theologiae, The New Advent, www.newadvent.org/summa/ (last accessed March 29, 2023).Google Scholar
Aristotle. c. 350 BCE/1984. The Politics, Lord, Carnes trans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. c. 350 BCE/2002. Nicomachean Ethics, Sachs, Joe trans. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.Google Scholar
Aristotle. c. 322 BCE/2009. “Rhetoric,” in Plato: Gorgias and Aristotle: Rhetoric, Sachs, Joe trans. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1838. “Anarchical Fallacies; An Examination of the Declarations of Rights Issued during the French Revolution,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 2, Bowring, John ed. Edinburg: William Tait, pp. 489–534.Google Scholar
Breakey, Hugh. 2014. “Who’s Afraid of Property Rights? Rights as Core Concepts, Coherent, Prima Facie, Situated, and Specified,” Law and Philosophy 33 (5): 573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David O. “Two Conceptions of Rights” (draft of August 9, 2021), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3899252 (last accessed May 15, 2024).Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Edmond. 1955. “Jurisprudence,” New York University Law Review 30 (1): 150–70.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2009. “Virtue and Rights in American Property Law,” Cornell Law Review 94 (4): 889–947.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2013. “Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory,” in Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, James E. Penner & Henry E. Smith eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–46.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2016. “Book Review,” Modern Law Review 79 (4): 751–56 (reviewing MacLeod (2015)).Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2021. “COVID, Civil Liberties, and the Police Power,” Law & Liberty, December 13, 2021, https://lawliberty.org/covid-civil-liberties-and-the-police-power/ (last accessed April 18, 2022).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S. 1935. “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35 (6): 809–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 2003. “The Grounds of Welfare,” Yale Law Journal 112 (6): 1511–43.Google Scholar
Couto, Alexandra. 2014. Liberal Perfectionism: The Reason That Goodness Gives. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 2011. Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneen, Patrick J. 2018. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1986. “Adverse Possession and Perpetuities Law: Two Dents in the Libertarian Model of Property Rights,” Washington University Law Quarterly 64 (3): 723–37.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1998. Principles for a Free Society: Reconciling Individual Liberty with the Common Good. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. “The Nature and Value of Rights,” Journal of Value Inquiry 4 (4): 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1984. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Volume One, Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1986. “Wrongful Life and the Counterfactual Element in Harming,” Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1): 145–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Finnis, John. 1980/2011. Natural Law & Natural Rights, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Ernest L. 1982. “The New Rights Theory and the Natural Law,” Review of Politics 44 (4): 590–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Gostin, Lawrence, and Hodge, James. 2002. “School Vaccination Requirements: Historical, Social, and Legal Perspectives,” Kentucky Law Journal 90: 831–90.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain. 1965. “The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae 1–2, Question 94, Article 2,” Natural Law Forum 10: 168–201.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip A. 1993. “Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutions,” Yale Law Journal 102 (4): 907–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 1787–88/2001. The Federalist: The Gideon Edition, Carey, George W. and McClellan, James eds. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2001.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1982. Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. 2015. Natural Law in Court: A History of Legal Theory in Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1642/1651/1991. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive), Gert, Bernard ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 23 (1): 16–59.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1918. “Natural Law,” Harvard Law Review 32 (1): 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 1993. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 2003/2018. “Virtue Ethics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/ (last accessed April 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Hynes, J. Dennis, and Loewenstein, Mark J.. 1997/2016. Agency, Partnership, and the LLC in a Nutshell, 6th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Kades, Eric. 2023. “Comparing and Contrasting Economic and Natural Law Approaches to Policymaking,” Texas A&M Journal of Property Law 9 (4): 561–612.Google Scholar
Kamm, F.M. 2007. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, and Shavell, Steven. 2002. Fairness Versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H. 2013. “Some Doubts about Alternatives to the Interest Theory of Rights,” Ethics 123 (2): 245–63.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1698/1988. Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, Peter ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1988. “The Primacy of the Common Good,” in Art and Prudence: Studies in the Thought of Jacques Maritain. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Mark P. 2004. “The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law,” Notre Dame Law Review 82 (5): 1839–916.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Adam J. 2015. Property and Practical Reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, Daniel. 2016. “The Failure of Joseph Raz’s Account of Legal Obligation,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 61 (2): 217–36.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacque. 1951. Man and the State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
“Metaethics,” (2021). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, undated. https://iep.utm.edu/metaethi/ (last accessed April 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Miller, Eugene F. 1990. “What Publius Says about Interest,” Political Science Reviewer 19: 11–48.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam & Claeys, Eric R.. 2021. “Patent Injunctions, Economics, and Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 50 (2): S129–50.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen R. 1990. A Theory of Property. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2019. “The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/ (last accessed April 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo M. 2009. “Land Virtues,” Cornell Law Review 94 (4): 821–88.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. 2005. Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1979. “Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory,” Journal of Legal Studies 8 (1): 103–40.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1993. Reinterpreting Property. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Douglas. 1999. “Perfectionism and the Appeal to Human Nature,” Social Philosophy & Policy 16 (1): 1–43.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Douglas B., and Den Uyl, Douglas J.. 2005. Norms of Liberty: A Perfectionist Basis for Non-Perfectionist Politics. University Park, PA Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1975/1990. Practical Reason and Norms, 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Restatement. See references for “American Law Institute.”Google Scholar
Sanders for President. 2020. “A Welcoming and Safe America for All.” https://berniesanders.com/issues/welcoming-and-safe-america-all/ (last accessed April 20, 2022).Google Scholar
Seagrave, S. Adam. 2014. The Foundations of Natural Morality: On the Compatibility of Natural Rights and the Natural Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Somin, Ilya. 2020. Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150–1625. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark. 2013. Moral Theory: An Introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Tyler, Samuel. 1877/1995. A Commentary on the Law of Partnership with an Appendix of Forms. Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman & Co.Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission. 1997. Revised Uniform Partnership Act. Available at www.uniformlaws.org/viewdocument/final-act-98?CommunityKey=52456941-7883-47a5-91b6-d2f086d0bb44&tab=librarydocuments (last accessed January 26, 2023).Google Scholar
United States Commission on Immigration Reform. 1994. U.S. Immigration Policy: Restoring Credibility—A Report to Congress. Executive Report, chaired by Rep. Barbara Jordan.Google Scholar
Veatch, Henry. 1985. Human Rights: Fact or Fancy? Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wall, Steven. 1998. Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Restraint. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Charlie. 2018. “Three Concepts of Rights, Two of Duty,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 38 (2): 246–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2015. “Rights.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/rights/ (last accessed April 18, 2022).Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1996. “Ethics, National Sovereignty and the Control of Immigration,” The International Migration Review 30 (1): 171–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, Thomas G. 2012. “The Grounds of Locke’s Law of Nature,” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2): 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Thomas G. 2017. The Political Theory of the American Founding: Natural Rights, Public Policy, and the Conditions of American Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, Jennifer. 1988. “Aristotle’s Function Argument: A Defense,” Ancient Philosophy 8: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James. 2016. “The Right to Public Health,” Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 367–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, Christopher. 2006. Natural Law Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan. 2004. “Scanlon on Well-Being,” in On What We Owe to Each Other, Stratton-Lake, Philip ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. 1997. “Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law?” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 20 (3): 695–731.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. 2002. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Natural Law and Rights
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Natural Law and Rights
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Natural Law and Rights
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.006
Available formats
×