Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:06:25.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Joseph LaPorte
Joseph LaPorte
Affiliation:
Hope College, Michigan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change , pp. 201 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Barbara. 1997. “A Note on the Nature of ‘Water’.” Mind 106: 311–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William. 1967. “Vagueness.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, ed. Paul Edwards, pp. 218–21. New York: Macmillan
Andersson, L. 1990. “The Driving Force: Species Concepts and Ecology.” Taxon 39: 375–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angier, Natalie. 1996. “Guinea Pigs Not Rodents? DNA Weighing In.” New York Times, 13 June
Armstrong, D. M. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature? New York: Cambridge University Press
Aune, Bruce. 1994. “Determinate Meaning and Analytic Truth.” In Living Doubt, ed. G. Debrock and M. Hulswit, pp. 55–65. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth, and Logic. Second Edition. New York: Dover
Ayer, A. J. 1992. “Reply to F. Miró Quesada.” In The Philosophy of A. J. Ayer, ed. L. E. Hahn, pp. 478–88. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court
Barnett, David. 2000. “Is Water Necessarily Identical to H2O?” Philosophical Studies 98: 99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Henry Walter. 1910. The Naturalist on the River Amazons. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co
Bealer, George. 1998. “Analyticity.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. Edward Craig, pp. 234–9. London: Routledge
Beatty, John. 1985. “Speaking of Species: Darwin's Strategy.” In The Darwinian Heritage, ed. David Kohn, pp. 265–81. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Beckner, Morton. 1967. “Vitalism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, ed. Paul Edwards, pp. 253–6. New York: Macmillan
Bernard, Claude. 1957. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Translated into English by Copley Green, with an Introduction by Lawrence J. Henderson and a Foreword by I. Bernard Cohen. New York: Dover. Originally published as Introduction à l'étude de la Médecine expérimentale. Paris: J. B. Baillière, 1865
Beurton, Peter. 2002. “Ernst Mayr through Time on the Biological Species Concept – A Conceptual Analysis.” Theory in Biosciences 121: 81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicheno, J. E. 1826. “On Systems and Methods in Natural History.” Transactions of the Linnæan Society 15: 479–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 1998. Philosophy of Science. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press
Boër, Steven. 1985. “Substance and Kind: Reflections on the New Theory of Reference.” In Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective, ed. B. K. Matilal and J. L. Shaw, pp. 103–50. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
Boghossian, Paul A. 1996. “Analyticity Revisited.” Noûs 30: 360–91CrossRef
Boghossian, Paul A. 1999. “Analyticity.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. Bob Hale and Crispin Wright, pp. 331–68. Oxford: Blackwell
Bolton, Cynthia J. 1996. “Proper Names, Taxonomic Names and Necessity.” The Philosophical Quarterly 46: 145–57CrossRef
Bowler, Peter J. 1994. “Are the Arthropoda a Natural Group? An Episode in the History of Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 27: 177–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjesson, Gary. 1999. “Not for Their Own Sake: Species and the Riddle of Individuality.” Review of Metaphysics 52: 867–96Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 1979. “Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor For?” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. A. Ortony, pp. 356–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Boyd, Richard 1991. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism, and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61: 127–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branley, Franklyn. 1989. What Happened to the Dinosaurs? New York: Crowell
Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. New York: Humanities Press
Brower, Andrew. 2000. “Evolution Is Not a Necessary Assumption of Cladistics.” Cladistics 16: 143–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James R. 2002. Review of Thomas Kuhn, by Alexander Bird. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 143–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummitt, Richard. 2002. “How to Chop Up a Tree.” Taxon 51: 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1982. “Other Bodies.” In Thought and Object, ed. A Woodfield, pp. 97–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bynum, W. F. 1981. “Vitalism.” In Dictionary of the History of Science, ed. W. F. Bynum, E. Browne, and Roy Porter, pp. 439–40. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Callahan, Rick. 2001. “Scientists: Fossil Dinosaur Was Covered in Primitive Feathers.” Associated Press, 25 April. LEXIS-NEXIS. 26 April 2001 <http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe>
Chambers, Robert. 1845. Explanations: A Sequel to “Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.” London: John Churchill. (Facsimile in Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings, ed. James A. Secord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.)
Churchland, Paul. 1985. “Conceptual Progress and Word/World Relations: In Search of the Essence of Natural Kinds.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andrew M. 1993. Hey's Mineral Index: Mineral Species, Varieties and Synonyms. Third Edition. London: Chapman & Hall
Cocchiarella, N. 1976. “On the Logic of Natural Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 43: 202–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Paul S., and Cohen, Stephen M. 1996. “Wöhler's Synthesis of Urea: How Do the Textbooks Report It?” Journal of Chemical Education 73: 883–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, William. 1977. Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function, and Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Collier, John. 1996. “On the Necessity of Natural Kinds.” In Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology, ed. P. Riggs, pp. 1–10. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage
Cook, Monte. 1980. “If ‘Cat’ Is a Rigid Designator, What Does It Designate?” Philosophical Studies 37: 61–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracraft, Joel. 1983. “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis.” In Current Ornithology, ed. R. F. Johnston, pp. 159–87. New York: Plenum Press
Daly, Chris. 1998. “Natural Kinds.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 6, ed. Edward Craig, pp. 682–5. London: Routledge
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray. (Facsimile: Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964.)
Darwin, Charles 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2 vols. London: John Murray. (Facsimile, 2 vols. in 1: Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.)
Darwin, Charles 1903. More Letters of Charles Darwin: A Record of His Work in a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Letters, 2 vols., ed. Francis Darwin and A. C. Seward. New York: D. Appleton and Company
Darwin, Charles 1975. Charles Darwin's Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written From 1856 to 1858, ed. R. C. Stauffer. New York: Cambridge University Press
Davis, Philip, and Hersh, Reuben. 1980. The Mathematical Experience. Boston: Birkhäuser
Dennett, Daniel. 1994. “Get Real.” Philosophical Topics 22: 505–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin. 1992. “Phylogenetic Definitions and Taxonomic Philosophy.” Biology and Philosophy 7: 295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin 1994. “Replacement of an Essentialistic Perspective on Taxonomic Definitions as Exemplified by the Definition of ‘Mammalia’.” Systematic Biology 43: 497–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin 1995. “The Definitions of Species and Clade Names: A Reply to Ghiselin.” Biology and Philosophy 10: 223–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin, and Cantino, Philip. 2001. “Phylogenetic Nomenclature and the PhyloCode.” Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 58: 254–71Google Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin, and Donoghue, Michael J. 1988. “Phylogenetic Systematics and the Species Problem.” Cladistics 4: 317–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin, and Gauthier, Jacques. 1994. “Toward a Phylogenetic System of Biological Nomenclature.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Erchia, Anna Maria. et al. 1996. “The Guinea-Pig Is Not a Rodent.” Nature 381: 597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, Ronald. 1984. “The Natural Shiftiness of Natural Kinds.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14: 561–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desautels, Paul. 1986. The Jade Kingdom. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
Devitt, Michael, and Sterelny, Kim. 1999. Languages and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Second Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Dietrich, R. V., and Chamberlain, Steven. 1989. “Are Cultured Pearls Mineral? The Continuing Evolution of the Definition of Mineral.” Rocks & Minerals 64: 386–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R. V., and Skinner, Brian J. 1990. Gems, Granites, and Gravels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1970. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press
Dodson, Peter, and Tatarinov, Leonid P. 1990. “Dinosaur Extinction.” In The Dinosauria ed. D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska, pp. 55–62. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
Doepke, F. 1992. “Identity and Natural Kinds.” The Philosophical Quarterly 42: 89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1983. “Kripke and Putnam on Natural Kind Terms.” In Knowledge and Mind, ed. C. Ginet and S. Shoemaker, pp. 84–104. New York: Oxford University Press
Donoghue, Michael. 2001. “A Wish List for Systematic Biology.” Systematic Biology 50: 755–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douven, Igor. 2000. “Theoretical Terms and the Principle of the Benefit of Doubt.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 135–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douven, Igor, and Brakel, Jaap. 1998. “Can the World Help Us in Fixing the Reference of Natural Kind Terms?” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29: 59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, William. 1990. Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics. New York: Wiley
Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Dupré, John 1999. “Are Whales Fish?” In Folkbiology, ed. D. Medin and S. Atran, pp. 461–76. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Dupré, John 2001. “In Defence of Classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 203–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Emmeche, Claus, K⊘ppe, Simo, and Stjernfelt, Frederik. 1997. “Explaining Emergence: Towards an Ontology of Levels.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28: 83–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. 1991. “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 58: 84–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc 1992. “Eliminative Pluralism.” Philosophy of Science 59: 671–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fawcett, Henry. 1973. “A Popular Exposition of Mr. Darwin on the Origin of Species.” Reprinted in Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community, ed. David Hull, pp. 277–90. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Feldmaier, Carl. 1970. Lilies. New York: Arco
Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: NLB
Feyerabend, Paul 1981a. “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism.” In Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, pp. 44–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Feyerabend, Paul 1981b. “On the ‘Meaning’ of Scientific Terms.” In Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, pp. 97–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Feyerabend, Paul 1988. Against Method. Revised Edition. London: Verso
Field, Hartry. 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70: 462–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Arthur. 1975. “How to Compare Theories: Reference and Change.” Noûs 9: 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, Jane Adams. 1997. “Sweet on Onions: With Vidalias, Walla Wallas and Mauis, You'll Never Shed a Tear.” Washington Post, 19 February. LEXIS-NEXIS. 15 June 2001 <http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe>
Forey, P. L. 2002. “PhyloCode – Pain, No Gain.” Taxon 51: 43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1953. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. J. L. Austin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Friedman, Michael. 2002. “Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science.” Philosophy of Science 69: 171–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gampel, Eric H. 1997. “Ethics, Reference, and Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Papers 26: 147–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gams, W. 1995. “How Natural Should Anamorph Genera Be?” Canadian Journal of Botany 73: S747–S753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Garlic.” Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 21 June 2001 <http://search.eb.com/eb/article?eu=36779>
Gauthier, Jacques, Estes, Richard, and de Queiroz, Kevin. 1988. “A Phylogenetic Analysis of Lepidosauromorpha.” In Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families, ed. R. Estes and G. Pregill, pp. 15–98. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Gee, Henry. 2000. “Science: Reptile Ruffles Feathers.” Guardian, 7 December, Guardian Science Pages. LEXIS-NEXIS. April 26, 2001 <http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe>
Ghiselin, Michael. 1974. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23: 536–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael 1980. “Natural Kinds and Literary Accomplishments.” Michigan Quarterly Review 19: 73–88Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael 1981. “Taxa, Life, and Thinking.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 303–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael 1987. “Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 127–43Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael 1989. “Individuality, History and Laws of Nature in Biology.” In What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull, ed. M. Ruse, pp. 53–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Ghiselin, Michael 1995. “Ostensive Definitions of the Names of Species and Clades.” Biology and Philosophy 10: 219–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press
Ghiselin, Michael 1999. “Natural Kinds and Supraorganismal Individuals.” In Folkbiology, ed. D. Medin and S. Atran, pp. 447–60. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Giaquinto, M. 1996. “Non-Analytic Conceptual Knowledge.” Mind 105: 249–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Roger. 1998. “Radical Translation and Radical Interpretation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, ed. Edward Craig, pp. 25–35. London: Routledge
Glass, Bentley. 1968. “Heredity and Variation in the Eighteenth Century Concept of the Species.” In Forerunners of Darwin, 1745–1859, ed. B. Glass, O. Temkin, and W. Straus, pp. 144–72. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press
Goldsmith, Oliver. 1791. An History of the Earth and Animated Nature, 8 vols. London: F. Wingrave
Goodfield, G. J. 1960. The Growth of Scientific Physiology. London: Hutchinson
Goodman, Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Gould, Stephen J. 1983. “What, if Anything, Is a Zebra?” In Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes, pp. 355–65. New York: Norton
Gould, Stephen J. 1991. Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton
Graur, Dan A., Hide, Winston, and Li, Wen-Hsiung. 1991. “Is the Guinea-Pig a Rodent?” Nature 351: 649–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, Frederick. 1977. Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
Griffiths, P. E 1994. “Cladistic Classification and Functional Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 61: 206–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gump, Richard. 1962. Jade: Stone of Heaven., N.Y.: Doubleday
Hacking, Ian. 1991. “A Tradition of Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61: 109–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, S. Howard 1948. “Jade and the Kingfisher.” Oriental Art 1: 12–17Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1967. “Quine on Meaning and Existence, I.” Review of Metaphysics 21: 124–51Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1973. Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Harman, Gilbert 1996. “Analyticity Regained?” Noûs 30: 392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, Willi. 1965. “Phylogenetic Systematics.” In Annual Review of Entomology, ed. R. Smith and T. Mittler, vol. 10, pp. 97–116. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc
Hennig, Willi 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Hey, Jody. 2001. Genes, Categories, and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem. New York: Oxford University Press
Hopkins, William. 1973. “Physical Theories of the Phenomena of Life.” Reprinted in Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community, ed. David Hull, pp. 229–72. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Hughes, Richard W. 1990. Corundum. London: Butterworth-Heinemann
Hull, David. 1973. Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Hull, David 1976. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David 1978. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45: 335–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David 1980. “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David 1981. “Metaphysics and Common Usage.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 290–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David 1987. “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 168–84Google Scholar
Hull, David 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Hull, David 1998. “Taxonomy.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 9, ed. Edward Craig, pp. 272–6. London: Routledge
Hull, David 2001. “The Role of Theories in Biological Systematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 221–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Christopher J., and Parenti, Lynne R. 1986. Cladistic Biogeography, pp. 22–4. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Jackson, Peter. 2000. “Subspecies and Conservation.” Cat News 32 (Spring). The Tiger Information Center. 1 August 2001 <http://www.5tigers.org/NewsLetters/CatNews/cn32/editorial.htm>
Jacob, François. 1982. The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity. New York: Pantheon Books
Johnson, L. A. S. 1970. “Rainbow's End: The Quest for an Optimal Taxonomy.” Systematic Zoology 19: 203–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, David, ed. 1998. Euclid's Elements, by Euclid. 17 July 2001 <http://aleph0.clarku.edu/∼djoyce/java/elements/elements.html>
Keefe, Rosanna, and Smith, Peter. 1997a. Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Keefe, Rosanna, and Smith, Peter 1997b. “Introduction: Theories of Vagueness.” In Vagueness: A Reader, pp. 1–57. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Keverne, Roger. 1991. Jade. London: Anness Publishing
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali. 1999. “Incommensurability.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Science, ed. W. H. Newton-Smith, pp. 172–80. Oxford: Blackwell
Kitcher, Philip. 1978. “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change.” Philosophical Review 87: 519–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1983. “Implications of Incommensurability.” In PSA 1982, vol. 2, ed. P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles, pp. 689–703. East Lansing, Mich.: PSA
Kitcher, Philip 1984. “Species.” Philosophy of Science 51: 308–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1987. “Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the ‘Philosophers’ on the Ontological Status of Species.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 184–92Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1989. “Some Puzzles About Species.” In What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull, ed. M. Ruse, pp. 183–208. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Kitcher, Philip 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kornblith, Hilary. 1980. “Referring to Artifacts.” The Philosophical Review 89: 109–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary 1993. Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Kraft, James Lewis. 1947. Adventure in Jade. New York: Holt
Kripke, Saul. 1971. “Identity and Necessity.” In Identity and Individuation, ed. M. K. Munitz, pp. 135–64. New York: New York University Press
Kripke, Saul 1977. “Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, II, Studies in the Philosophy of Language, ed. P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, pp. 225–76. Morris: University of Minnesota Press
Kripke, Saul 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970a. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970b. “Reflections on My Critics.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, pp. 231–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1979. “Metaphor in Science.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. A. Ortony, pp. 409–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1981. “What Are Scientific Revolutions?” Occasional Paper #18, Cambridge, Mass.: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1983a. “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability.” In PSA 1982, vol. 2, ed. P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles, pp. 669–88. East Lansing, Mich.: PSA
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1983b. “Response to Commentaries.” In PSA 1982, vol. 2, ed. P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles, pp. 712–16. East Lansing, Mich.: PSA
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1990. “Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14, ed. C. Wade Savage, pp. 298–318. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2000a. “Possible Worlds in the History of Science.” In The Road Since Structure, ed. James Conant and John Haugeland, pp. 58–89. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2000b. “Afterwords.” In The Road Since Structure, ed. James Conant and John Haugeland, pp. 224–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lange, Marc. 1995. “Are There Natural Laws Concerning Particular Biological Species?” Journal of Philosophy 92: 430–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J. 1996. “Chemical Kind Term Reference and the Discovery of Essence.” Noûs 30: 112–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J. 2000. “Rigidity and Kind.” Philosophical Studies 97: 293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J. forthcoming. Review of Genes, Categories, and Species, by Jody Hey. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
. The Illustrated Origin of Species,
Levine, Alex. 2001. “Individualism, Type Specimens, and the Scrutability of Species Membership.” Biology and Philosophy 16: 325–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett. 1988. “Is Essentialism Unscientific?” Philosophy of Science 55: 493–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1983. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. I, pp. 233–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lewis, David 1996. “Elusive Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 549–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1993. “Natural Kinds: Direct Reference, Realism, and the Impossibility of Necessary A Posteriori Truth.” Review of Metaphysics 47: 261–76Google Scholar
Liebig, Justus. 1842. Animal Chemistry,
Lipman, Timothy O. 1967. “Vitalism and Reductionism in Liebig's Physiological Thought.” Isis 58: 167–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 1999. Review of Philosophy of Science, by Alexander Bird. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 163–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. with a Foreword by Peter Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Logue, James. 1995. “Incommensurability.” In The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. Ted Honderich, p. 397. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1968. “Buffon and the Problem of Species.” In Forerunners of Darwin, 1745–1859, ed. B. Glass, O. Temkin, and W. Straus, pp. 84–113. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press
Lowe, E. J. 1995. “Analytic and Synthetic Statements.” In The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. T. Honderich, p. 28. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lowe, E. J. 1997. “Ontological Categories and Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Papers 26: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William G. 1994. Modality and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Macbeth, Danielle. 1995. “Names, Natural Kind Terms, and Rigid Designation.” Philosophical Studies 79: 259–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1976. Problems from Locke. New York: Oxford University Press
Maddy, Penelope. 1990. Realism in Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Maor, Eli. 1991. To Infinity and Beyond. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Margalit, Avishai. 1979. “Sense and Science.” In Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka, ed. E. Saarinen, R. Hilpinen, I. Niiniluoto, and M. P. Hintikka, pp. 17–47. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
Margolis, Eric, and Laurence, Stephen. 2001. “Boghossian on Analyticity.” Analysis 61 293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Graham. 1996. “Birds in Double Trouble.” Nature 380: 666–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan. 1998. “Biological Universals and the Nature of Fear.” Journal of Philosophy 95: 105–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, John. 2001. “Foreword.” In Genes, Categories, and Species, by Jody Hey, pp. XV–XVII. New York: Oxford University Press
Mayr, Ernst. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill
Mayr, Ernst 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution: An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst 1976. Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst 1987. “The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 145–66Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst 1995. “Systems of Ordering Data.” Biology and Philosophy 10: 419–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst 2002. “Comments by Ernst Mayr.” Theory in Biosciences 121: 99–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst, and Ashlock, Peter. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
Mayr, E., Linsley, E. G., and Usinger, R. L. 1953. Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill
McDougall, William. 1934. Modern Materialism and Emergent Evolution. Second Edition. London: Methuen
McDougall, William 1938. The Riddle of Life. London: Methuen
McGrew, Tim. 1994. “Scientific Progress, Relativism, and Self-Refutation.” The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (2). 19 July 2001 <http://ejap.louisiana.edu/EJAP/1994.may/mcgrew.abs.html>Google Scholar
Medawar, P. B. and Medawar, J. S. 1983. Aristotle to Zoos: A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Meier, Rudolf, and Willmann, Rainer. 2000. “The Hennigian Species Concept.” In Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, ed. Quentin Wheeler and Rudolf Meier, pp. 30–43. New York: Columbia University Press
Mellor, D. H. 1991. “Natural Kinds.” In Matters of Metaphysics, pp. 123–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Miller, Alexander. 1998. Philosophy of Language. London: UCL Press
Miller, Richard B. 1992. “A Purely Causal Solution to One of the Qua Problems.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70: 425–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B., and Brandon, R. 1987. “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B., and Donoghue, M. 1982. “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism.” Systematic Zoology 31: 491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondadori, Fabrizio. 1978. “Interpreting Modal Semantics.” In Studies in Formal Semantics, ed. F. Guenther and C. Rohrer, pp. 13–40. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co
Morgan, C. Lloyd. 1923. Emergent Evolution. London: Williams and Norgate
Neale, Stephen. 2001. “No Plagiarism Here: The Originality of Saul Kripke.” Review of The New Theory of Reference, by Paul Humphreys and James Fetzer, eds. Times Literary Supplement, 9 February: 12–13
Nersessian, Nancy. 1991. “Discussion: The Method to ‘Meaning’: A Reply to Leplin.” Philosophy of Science 58: 678–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Stephen J. 1987. “The Ancestry of the Giant Panda.” Scientific American 257(5): 102–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Donnell, Kerry, Cigelnik, Elizabeth, and Nirenberg, Helgard I. 1998. “Molecular Systematics and Phylogeography of the Gibberella Fujikuroi Species Complex.” Mycologia 90: 465–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, Robert. 1993. “Systematic Generalization, Historical Fate, and the Species Problem.” Systematic Biology 42: 231–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131: 191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmsted, J. M. D., and Olmsted, E. Harris. 1952. Claude Bernard and the Experimental Method in Medicine. New York: Henry Schuman
“Onion”a. 2001. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. New York: Columbia University Press. 21 June 2001 <http://www.bartleby.com/65>
“Onion”b. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 21 June 2001 <http://search.eb.com/eb/article?eu=58571>
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1905. “Tyrannosaurus and Other Cretaceous Carnivorous Dinosaurs.” Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21: 259–65Google Scholar
Ottobre, Ron. 2001. “Fresh Asparagus: A Gift from Spring.” Baltimore Sun, 11 April. LEXIS-NEXIS. 15 June 2001 <http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe>
Papineau, David. 1996. “Theory-Dependent Terms.” Philosophy of Science 63: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, H. 1985. “The Recognition Concept of Species.” In Species and Speciation, ed. E. Vrba, pp. 21–9. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum
Patterson, Colin. 1993. “Scientific Correspondence.” Nature 366: 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Platts, Mark. 1997. Ways of Meaning: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Language. Second Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Philippe, Hervé. 1997. “Rodent Monophyly: Pitfalls of Molecular Phylogenies.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 45: 712–15Google ScholarPubMed
Poncinie, Lawrence. 1985. “Meaning Change for Natural Kind Terms.” Noûs 19: 415–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pough, F. Harvey, Heiser, John B., and McFarland, William N. 1996. Vertebrate Life. Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall
Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1975b. “The Analytic and the Synthetic.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 33–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1975c. “Is Semantics Possible?” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 139–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1975d. “Explanation and Reference.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 196–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1975e. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1975f. “Language and Reality.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 272–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1983a. “Possibility and Necessity.” In Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, pp. 46–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1983b. “‘Two Dogmas’ Revisited.” In Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, pp. 87–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, Hilary 1992. “Is It Necessary That Water Is H2O?” In The Philosophy of A. J. Ayer, ed. L. E. Hahn. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court
Quaker Oats Company. 1997. “Did U Know?” Chicago, Ill.: Quaker Oats Co
Quine, W. V. 1961. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Quine, W. V. 1976a. “Truth by Convention.” In Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, pp. 77–106. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Quine, W. V. 1976b. “Carnap and Logical Truth.” In Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, pp. 107–32. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Reid, Jasper. 2002. “Natural Kind Essentialism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80: 62–74Google Scholar
Reimer, Marga. 1997. “Could There Have Been Unicorns?” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5: 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges. 1993. “The Unavailability of What We Mean: A Reply to Quine, Fodor, and Lepore.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 46: 61–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Mark. 1986. Evolution and Classification: The Reformation of Cladism. London: Longman
Ridley, Mark 1989. “The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem.” Biology and Philosophy 4: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. 1993. “Zoological Taxonomy and Real Life.” In Realism and Representation, ed. G. Levine, pp. 235–54. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
Rockwell, F. F., Grayson, Esther C., and de Graaff, Jan. 1961. The Complete Book of Lilies., N.Y.: Doubleday
Rorty, Richard. 1999. Review of The Social Construction of What?, by Ian Hacking. The Atlantic Monthly, 284(5): 120–2Google Scholar
Rosen, Donn Eric. 1974. “Cladism or Gradism?: A Reply to Ernst Mayr.” Systematic Zoology 23: 446–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1987. “Why Does the Nature of Species Matter?” Biology and Philosophy 2: 192–7Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Stuart, and Bhushan, Nalini. 2000. “Chemical Synthesis: Complexity, Similarity, Natural Kinds, and the Evolution of a ‘Logic’.” In Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, ed. Bhushan and Rosenfeld, pp. 187–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rosselló-Mora, Ramon, and Amann, Rudolf. 2001. “The Species Concept for Prokaryotes.” FEMS Microbiology Reviews 25: 39–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudler, Frederick William. 1911. “Jade.” In Encyclopaedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition. vol. 15, pp. 122–4
Ruse, Michael. 1987. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 225–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, Michael 1999. Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Russell, E. S. 1911. “Vitalism.” Rivista di scienza, “Scientia” 9: 329–45Google Scholar
Russell, E. S. 1930. The Interpretation of Development and Heredity: A Study in Biological Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Ryder, Oliver. 1987. “The Giant Panda Is a Bear.” Zoonooz 60(8): 16–17Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Mark. 1991. Logical Forms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Sakikawa, Noriyuki. 1968. Jade. Tokyo: Japan Publications
Salmon, Merrilee, et al. 1992. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall
Salmon, Nathan. 1980. Reference and Essence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Sankey, Howard. 1994. The Incommensurability Thesis. Aldershot: Avebury
Scheffler, Israel. 1967. Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
Schloegel, Judy Johns. 1999. “From Anomaly to Unification: Tracy Sonneborn and the Species Problem in Protozoa, 1954–1957.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 93–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Stanley. 1998. “A Century of (Epithelial) Transport Physiology: From Vitalism to Molecular Cloning.” American Journal of Physiology 274: C13–C23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, Steven P. 1977. “Introduction.” In Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds, pp. 13–41. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
Schwartz, Steven P. 1980. “Formal Semantics and Natural Kind Terms.” Philosophical Studies 38: 189–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Second General Discussion Session.” 1974. Synthese 27: 509–21CrossRef
Segal, Gabriel. 2000. A Slim Book About Narrow Content. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Shapere, Dudley. 1981. “Meaning and Scientific Change.” In Scientific Revolutions, ed. Ian Hacking, pp. 28–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shapere, Dudley 1998. “Incommensurability.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4, ed. Edward Craig, pp. 732–6. London: Routledge
Sidelle, Alan. 1989. Necessity, Essence, and Individuation: A Defense of Conventionalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press
Smith, Hobart M. 1990. “The Universal Species Concept.” Herpetologica 46: 122–4Google Scholar
Sneath, Peter, and Sokal, Robert. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Sokal, Robert, and Sneath, Peter. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co
Spears, Tom. 1993. “Modern Dinosaurs End Up on Dinner Plate.” Ottawa Citizen, 29 December. LEXIS-NEXIS. 26 April 2001 <http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe>
Speer, Brian R. 1998. “Liliales: The True Lilies.” University of California, Berkeley Museum of Paleontology. 15 June 2001 <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/monocots/liliflorae/liliales.html>
Spencer, Leonard J. 1936. A Key to Precious Stones. London: Blackie & Son Limited
Stamos, David. 1998. “Buffon, Darwin, and the Non-Individuality of Species: A Reply to Jean Gayon.” Biology and Philosophy 13: 443–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. 1983. “Natural Kind Terms.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 110–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim 1994. “The Nature of Species.” Philosophical Books 35: 9–20Google Scholar
Stevens, P. F. 1984. “Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, or the Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles.” Taxon 33: 169–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, Helen. 1990. “Identity Statements and the Necessary A Posteriori.” Journal of Philosophy 87: 385–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickberger, Monroe W. 1996. Evolution. Second Edition. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett
Swoyer, Chris. 2001. “Properties.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2001), ed. Edward N. Zalta. August 31, 2001 <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/properties/>
Tangley, Laura. 1997. “At Last, the Missing Link.” U.S. News & World Report, June, 14
Teich, Mikuláš, and Needham, Dorothy. 1992. A Documentary History of Biochemistry, 1770–1940. Leicester: Leicester University Press
Teller, Paul. 1977. “Indicative Introduction.” Philosophical Studies 31: 173–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, Alan. 1992. “The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective.” In The Units of Evolution, ed. M. Ereshefsky, pp. 159–83. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Tennant, Smithson. 1797. “On the Nature of the Diamond.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 87(97): 123–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, M. 1977. “The Nature of Laws.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 667–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Brakel, J. 1992. “Natural Kinds and Manifest Forms of Life.” Dialectica 46: 243–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Hoek, C., Mann, D. G., and Jahns, H. M. 1995. Algae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Valen, L. 1976. “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks.” Taxon 25: 233–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valen, L. 1989. “Metascience.” Evolutionary Theory 9: 99–103Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich. 1945. “Verifiability.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 119–50Google Scholar
Ward, Fred, and Ward, Charlotte. 1996. Jade. Bethesda, Md.: Gem Book Publishers
Watson, Hewett C. 1845. “On the Theory of ‘Progressive Development,’ Applied in Explanation of the Origin and Transmutation of Species.” Phytologist 2: 108–13 140–7Google Scholar
Wheeler, L. R. 1939. Vitalism: Its History and Validity. London: Witherby
Whitlock, Herbert, and Ehrmann, Martin. 1949. The Story of Jade. New York: Sheridan House
Wiley, E. O. 1978. “The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered.” Systematic Zoology 27: 17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics. New York: Wiley
Wilkerson, T. E. 1993. “Species, Essences and the Names of Natural Kinds.” The Philosophical Quarterly 43: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, James. 1995. “Pioneer in a Random World.” Times (London), 12 May, Educational Supplement, p. XVI
Wills, Geoffrey. 1964. Jade. London: Arco Publications
Wilson, Jack. 1999. Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wolfram, Sybil. 1989. Philosophical Logic: An Introduction. London: Routledge
Wollaston, Thomas Vernon. 1973. Review of the Origin of Species. Reprinted in Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community, ed. David Hull, pp. 127–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Joseph LaPorte, Hope College, Michigan
  • Book: Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527319.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Joseph LaPorte, Hope College, Michigan
  • Book: Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527319.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Joseph LaPorte, Hope College, Michigan
  • Book: Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527319.010
Available formats
×