Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:06:55.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Intercultural Relations in Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

By
Asteria Brylka, ,
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti  and
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Edited by
John W. Berry
John W. Berry
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mutual Intercultural Relations , pp. 81 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberson, C. L., & Gaffney, A. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, R. (1985). Finland’s Relations with the Soviet Union, 1944–84. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, F. K., Sibley, C. G., & Hornsey, M. J. (2012). Rejection as a call to arms: Inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J.W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In Padilla, A. (ed.), Acculturation: Theories and some new findings. Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Taylor, D. M., & Kalin, R. (1977). Multiculturalism and Ethnic Attitudes in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of State for Multiculturalism.Google Scholar
Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001a). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001b). Perceived threat and Israeli Jews’ evaluations of Russian immigrants: The moderating role of Jewish and Israeli identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2008). “My group is not worthy of me”: Narcissism and ethnocentrism. Political Psychology, 29, 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y., Moïse, L. C., Perreault, S. & Senécal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015a). National identification and attitudes towards Russian immigrants in Finland: Investigating the role of perceived threats and gains. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 670–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015b). National identification and intergroup attitudes among members of the national majority and immigrants: Preliminary evidence for the mediational role of psychological ownership of a country. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., Schellhaas, F. M. H., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015). From cultural discordance to support for collective action: The roles of intergroup anxiety, trust and group status. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 897–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceuppens, B., & Geschiere, P. (2005). Autochthony: Local or global? New modes in the struggle over citizenship and belonging in Africa and Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gausset, Q., Kenrick, J., & Gibb, R. (2011). Indigeneity and autochthony: A couple of false twins? Social Anthropology, 19, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Esses, V. M. (2003). Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horenczyk, G., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2013). Mutuality in acculturation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221(4), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaakkola, M. (2005). Suomalaisten suhtautuminen maahanmuuttajiin vuosina 1987–2003 [Finns’ attitudes towards immigrants in years 1987–2007]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Labour.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, M. (2009). Maahanmuuttajat suomalaisten näkökulmasta: Asennemuutokset 1987–2007 [Immigrants from the perspective of Finns: Change in attitudes 1987–2007]. Helsinki, Finland: City of Helsinki Information Center.Google Scholar
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., & Solheim, E. (2009). To identify or not to identify? National disidentification as an alternative reaction to perceived ethnic discrimination. Applied Psychology, 58(1), 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mähönen, T. A., Brylka, A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2014). Perceived ethnic superiority and immigrants’ attitudes towards multiculturalism and the national majority. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 318–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinovic, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). ‘We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game’: Autochthony and prejudice towards out-groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migrants Integration Policy Index MIPEX (2015). Retrieved from www.mipex.eu/.Google Scholar
Navas, M., García, M., Sánchez, J., Rojas, A. J., Pumares, P., & Fernandez, J. S. (2005). Relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, T., Sutela, H., & Hannula, U. (2015). Ulkomaista syntyperää olevien työ ja hyvinvointi Suomessa 2014 [Work and well-being of foreigners in Finland 2014]. Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective and cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohmann, A., Florack, A., & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saukkonen, P. (2013). Erilaisuuksien Suomi [Finland of diversities]. Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
Saukkonen, P. (2014). Multiculturalism and cultural policy in Northern Europe. The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy/Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift, 16(02), 178–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. (2007). Universalism, values, and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staerklé, C., Sidanius, J., Green, E. G. T., & Molina, L. (2005). Ethnic minority-majority asymmetry and attitudes towards immigrants across 11 nations. Psicologia Politica, 30, 7–26.Google Scholar
Statistics Finland (2014). Foreign-language speakers account for 90 per cent of the population growth in 2013. Retrieved from www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2013/vaerak_2013_2014-03-21_tie_001_en.html.Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S., & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., & Davis, M. D. (2008). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In Wagner, U., Tropp, L. R., Finchilescu, G. & Tredoux, C. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 55–72). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. The Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (Eds.), Intergroup relations (pp. 94–109). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varjonen, S., Arnold, L., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2013). ‘We’re Finns here, and Russians there’: A longitudinal study on ethnic identity construction in the context of ethnic migration. Discourse and Society, 24, 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2006). Understanding multicultural attitudes: The role of group status, identification, friendships, and justifying ideologies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Sierksma, J., & Martinovic, B. (2015). First arrival and collective land ownership: How children reason about who owns the land. Social Development, 24, 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×