Book contents
- Morphotactics
- Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
- Morphotactics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Symbols and Operators
- 1 Canonical Morphotactics
- 2 Rule Combinations
- 3 Dependent Rules and Carrier Rules
- 4 Rule Composition and Rule Ordering
- 5 Extending Canonical Morphotactic Criteria to Composite Rules
- 6 Rule Combinations Expressing Holistic Content
- 7 Rule Aggregation
- 8 Complex Morphotactic Interactions in Swahili
- 9 The Nonassociativity of Rule Composition in Murrinhpatha
- 10 Potentiation and Counterpotentiation
- 11 Rule Combinations and Morphological Simplicity
- 12 Rule‑combining Morphotactics and Morphological Theories
- 13 Conclusions
- References
- Index
2 - Rule Combinations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2022
- Morphotactics
- Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
- Morphotactics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Symbols and Operators
- 1 Canonical Morphotactics
- 2 Rule Combinations
- 3 Dependent Rules and Carrier Rules
- 4 Rule Composition and Rule Ordering
- 5 Extending Canonical Morphotactic Criteria to Composite Rules
- 6 Rule Combinations Expressing Holistic Content
- 7 Rule Aggregation
- 8 Complex Morphotactic Interactions in Swahili
- 9 The Nonassociativity of Rule Composition in Murrinhpatha
- 10 Potentiation and Counterpotentiation
- 11 Rule Combinations and Morphological Simplicity
- 12 Rule‑combining Morphotactics and Morphological Theories
- 13 Conclusions
- References
- Index
Summary
I discuss my assumptions about individual morphological rules, and then explain the ways in which rules combine. Rule composition, the default mode of rule combination, models many canonical patterns, but also models certain deviations from the canonical morphotactic criteria. Holistic rule combination, a second mode of combination, accounts for deviations from the compositional content criterion, in which a rule combination realizes more than the sum of the content that those rules realize individually. Rule aggregation, a third mode of combination, accounts for deviations from the stem operand criterion, in which a rule operates not on a stem, but on the affix introduced by the rule with which it combines. Counterpotentiation, a fourth mode of combination, accounts for deviations from the intermediate well-formedness criterion, in which the result of applying one rule is ill-formed unless its application is followed by that of another particular rule. I outline the elaboration of these ideas in the ensuing chapters.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- MorphotacticsA Rule-Combining Approach, pp. 36 - 82Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022