Sovereignty, recognition and indigenous peoples

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755897.005

4 - Sovereignty, recognition and indigenous peoples

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2010

Jonathan Havercroft

Edited by

Richard M. Price

Show author details

Jonathan Havercroft: Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Oklahoma.
Richard M. Price: Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Scholars of international relations have long studied the importance of the central institution of sovereignty, and how the practices and rules of mutual recognition have shaped the identities, interests and behaviours of states and constituted the international system itself. And yet, normative questions about what constitutes a just form of recognition in international politics have largely been pushed aside. Is it just, for instance, that only sovereign states are fully recognised under international law? Which actors should or should not be recognised in global politics and international law? How are different groups and agents mis-recognised or unrecognised? What are the consequences of such mis-recognition or non-recognition? And what can be done to promote more just forms of recognition?

In this chapter I propose to answer these questions as they apply to the particular case of indigenous peoples in world politics. The same system of international law that has promoted norms of sovereignty and human rights has also been complicit in European processes of conquest and colonialism. These processes have meant that only certain actors – the sovereign states of Europe and states that were recognised as sovereign over time by the original members of this exclusive club – have full recognition under international law. The self-governing political communities of indigenous peoples have never been incorporated or recognised in this system, even though they were self-governing prior to first contact and in most instances – despite overwhelming pressure from settler societies – these peoples have maintained a form of self-government down to this day.

Type: Chapter
Information: Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics , pp. 112 - 137

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755897.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Niezen, Ronald, The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003), chapter 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Brysk, Allison, From Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Perry, Richard, From Time Immemorial: Indigenous Peoples and the State System (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Wilmer, Franke, The Indigenous Voice in World Politics (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Keal, Paul, European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘“Indigenous Peoples” in International Law: A Constructivist Approach to the Asian Controversy’, The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998), 414–457CrossRef Google Scholar

Shaw, Karena, ‘Indigeneity and the International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31:1 (2002), 55–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Anaya, James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Flanagan, Tom, First Nations? Second Thoughts (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Cairns, Alan C., Citizens Plus: Aboriginal Peoples and the Canadian State (Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Alfred, Taiaiake, Peace, Power, and Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Tully, James, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Corntassel, Jeff, ‘Towards a New Partnership? Indigenous Mobilization and Co-optation during the First UN Indigenous Decade (1995–2004)’, Human Rights Quarterly 29:1 (2007)CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, ‘Hybrid Democracy: Iroquois Federalism and the Post-Colonial Project’. In Ivison, Duncan, Patton, Paul and Saunders, Will (eds.), Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 237–258Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 327Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention’. In Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52:4 (1998)CrossRef Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction’. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Interventions in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 60CrossRef Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will, Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, ‘The Politics of Recognition’. In Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Multiculturalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Barsh, Russel Lawrence, ‘Indigenous Peoples and the UN Commission on Human Rights: A Case of the Immovable Object and the Irresistible Force’, Human Rights Quarterly 18:4 (1996), 783CrossRef Google Scholar

Vitoria, Francisco, De Indis Et Ivre Belli Relectiones, translated by Bate, J. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington, 1917)Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, translated by Rehg, William (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999), 107Google Scholar

Williams, Robert A., Linking Arms Together (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 4Google Scholar