Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:14:03.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Historical Insights for Contemporary Moral Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

Edited by
Douglas W. Yacek ,
Mark E. Jonas  and
Kevin H. Gary
Douglas W. Yacek
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Mark E. Jonas
Affiliation:
Wheaton College, Illinois
Kevin H. Gary
Affiliation:
Valparaiso University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Moral Education in the 21st Century , pp. 7 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ahlstrom-Vij, K. (2013). Epistemic paternalism: A defence. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, N. (2019). Knowing our limits. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callan, E. & Arena, D. (2009). Indoctrination. In Siegel, H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 104–121). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M., (Ed). (1997). Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. (2005). Why should analytic philosophers do history of philosophy? In Sorell, T. & Rogers, G. A. J. (Eds.), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy (pp. 25–41). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. (2017). Socrates on why we should inquire. Ancient Philosophy, 37(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Futter, D. B. (2015). Variations in Philosophical Genre: The Platonic Dialogue. Metaphilosophy, 46(2), 246–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2020). Plato in therapy: A cognitivist reassessment of the Republic’s idea of mimesis.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 78(2), 157–169.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2021). The ancient aesthetics of deception: The ethics of enchantment from Gorgias to Heliodorus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannon, M. (2020). Empathetic understanding and deliberative democracy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 101(3), 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, M. E. & Nakazawa, Y. (2020). A Platonic theory of moral education: Cultivating virtue in contemporary democratic classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J. (2017). Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. (2021). Reading Plato’s dialogues to enhance learning and inquiry: Exploring Socrates’ use of protreptic for student engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. (2022). Response to the review symposium on Reading Plato’s dialogues to enhance learning and inquiry: Exploring Socrates’ use of protreptic for student engagement. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 41: 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09848-2.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. L. (2013). Socrates, Plato, erōs and liberal education. Oxford Review of Education, 36 (2010): 527–541. (Reprinted in C. Brooke & E. Frazer (Eds.), Ideas of education: Philosophy and politics from Plato to Dewey (pp. 6–20). New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar
Mintz, A. I. (2018). Plato: Images, aims, and practices of education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakazawa, Y. (2021). Plato: Philosophy as education. In Mintz, A. I. (Ed.), A history of Western philosophy of education: Vol. 1. In Antiquity (pp. 53–74). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (2010). Blindness and reorientation: Education and the acquisition of knowledge in the Republic. In McPherran, M. L. (Ed.), Plato’s “Republic”: A Critical Guide (pp. 209–28). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1999). Platonic pessimism and moral education. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 17, 15–36.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2006). Descartes and the historiography of philosophy. In Cottingham, J. (Ed.), Reason, will and sensation: Studies in Descartes’s metaphysics (pp. 19–27). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Reprinted in The sense of the past: Essays in the history of philosophy (pp. 257–264). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.)Google Scholar

References

Aldridge, D. (2013). Three epiphanic fragments; Education and the essay in memory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 512–526.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. (2005). Virtues we can share: Friendship and Aristotelian ethical theory. Ethics, 115(4), 721–758.Google Scholar
Gary, K., & Chambers, D. (2021). Cultivating moral epiphanies. Educational Theory, 71 (93), 371–388.Google Scholar
Healy, M. (2011). Should we take the friendships of children seriously? Journal of Moral Education, 40(4), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, M. (2017). Should children have best friends? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(2), 183–195.Google Scholar
Hoyos-Valdés, D. (2018). The notion of character friendship and the cultivation of virtue. The Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 48(1), 66–82.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. (2015). Education for epiphany: The case of Plato’s Lysis. Educational Theory, 65(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. (2016). Plato’s anti-Kohlbergian program for moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(2), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, M. (2018). Plato on dialogue as a method for cultivating the virtues. In Harrison, T. & Walker, D. (Eds.), The theory and practice of virtue education (pp. 85–97). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jonas, M., & Nakazawa, Y. (2021). A Platonic theory of moral education: Cultivating virtue in contemporary democratic classrooms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2005). Can we teach justified anger? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 671–689.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2006a). Emulation and the use of role models in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 35(1), 37–49.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2006b) Habituated reason: Aristotle and the “paradox of moral education.” Theory and Research in Education, 4(1), 101–122.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2007). Aristotle, emotions and education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2014a). On the old saw that dialogue is a Socratic but not an Aristotelian method of moral education. Educational Theory, 64(4), 333–348.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2014b). There is something about Aristotle: The pros and cons of Aristotelianism in contemporary moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48 (1), 48–68.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2014c). Undoing bad upbringing through contemplation: An Aristotelian reconstruction. Journal of Moral Education, 43(4), 468–483.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Aristotelian character education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2016). Aristotle, emotions and education character education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2020a). Flourishing as the aim of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2020b). Aristotelian character friendship as a “method” of moral education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(4), 349–364.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2022). Friendship and virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2011). Review essay of Kristján Kristjánsson’s “Justifying emotions: Pride and jealousy,” “Justice and desert-based emotions,” “Aristotle, emotions, and education” and ‘The self and its emotions.” Theory and Research in Education, 9, 185–196.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2012). Character education: A neo-aristotelian approach to the philosophy, psychology and education of virtue. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2013). The meaning of role modeling in moral and character education. Journal of Moral Education, 42(1), 28–42.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2015). An Aristotelian model of moral development. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 49(3), 382–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2016). Aristotelian action research: Its value for studying character education in schools. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 446–459.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2019). Does neo-Aristotelian character education maintain the educational status quo? Lessons from the 19th-century Bildung tradition. Ethics and Education, 14(4), 399–414.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2020). Does Aristotle believe that habituation is only for children? Journal of Moral Education, 49(1), 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghid, Y. (2008). Democratic citizenship, education and friendship revisited: In defense of democratic justice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2–3), 197–206.Google Scholar
White, P. (1990). Friendship and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24(1), 81–91.Google Scholar
Yacek, D. (2020). Should anger be encouraged in the classroom? Political education, close-mindedness and civic epiphany. Educational Theory, 69(4), 421–437.Google Scholar
Yacek, D. (2021). The transformative classroom: Philosophical foundations and practical applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yacek, D., & Gary, K. (2020). Transformative experience and epiphany in education. Theory and Research in Education, 18(2), 217–237.Google Scholar
Yacek, D., & Ijaz, K. (2020). Education as transformation: Formalism, moralism and the substantivist alternative. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(1), 124–145.Google Scholar
Yaden, D. B., & Newberg, A. B. (2015). Road to Damascus moments: Calling experiences as prospective epiphanies. In Yaden, D. B., McCall, T., & Ellens, J. H. (Eds.), Being called: Secular, scientific and sacred perspectives (pp. 27–44). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33, 1–19.Google Scholar
Aristotle (2003). Nicomachean Ethics. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/8438/8438-h/8438-h.htm.Google Scholar
Athanassoulis, N. (2021). Virtue ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/virtue.Google Scholar
Becker, L. C. (1997). A new stoicism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beckwith, C. I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s encounter with early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Benbaji, Y., & Fisch, M. (2004). Through thick and thin: A new defense of cultural relativism. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 42, 1–24.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1780). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Available at: https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/bentham1780.pdf.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (Ed.) (2010). The Cambridge companion to ancient skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed.), Essays on moral realism (pp. 181–228). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (2014). Complete works. Hastings: Delphi Classics.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. (1886). Lectures and essays. Eds. Stephen, L. & Pollock, F., New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, S. (1960). The prime of life. London: Lowe & Brydone.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on first philosophy. Available at: http://www.classicallibrary.org/descartes/meditations.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. (2018). Lives of the eminent philosophers. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/57342/57342-h/57342-h.htm.Google Scholar
Douven, I. (2021). Abduction (inference to the best explanation). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hard, R. (Trans.) (2012). Diogenes the cynic: Sayings and anecdotes, with other popular moralists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, A., & Fumerton, R. (2016). Foundationalist theories of epistemic justification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justep-foundational.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. (2018). The problem of induction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (2021). Fallibilism, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/fallibil.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739). A treatise of human nature. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm.Google Scholar
Irvine, W. B. (2008). A guide to the good life: The ancient art of stoic joy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5682.Google Scholar
Kurtz, P. (1992). The new skepticism: Inquiry and reliable knowledge. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. 2nd ed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
McEvilley, T. (2002). The shape of ancient thought. New York, NY: Allworth.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11224.Google Scholar
Moberger, V. (2020). Bullshit, pseudoscience and pseudophilosophy. Theoria, 86(5), 595–611.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. (2021). Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/coherent/.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2017). How to be a stoic: Using ancient philosophy to live a modern life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Plato (1992). Laches and Charmides. Trans. Sprague, R. Kent, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2018). Stoicism and the art of happiness: Practical wisdom for everyday life – Embrace perseverance, strength and happiness with stoic philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Teach Yourself.Google Scholar
Sellars, J. (2006). Stoicism. Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar
Sellars, J. (2018). Hellenistic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talbott, W. (2008). Bayesian epistemology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-bayesian/.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2018). Carneades In Machuga, D. E. & Reed, B. (Eds.), Skepticism: From antiquity to the present (pp. 51–67). London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Turri, J., Alfano, M., & Grego, J. (2021). Virtue epistemology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-virtue; for some of the quotes, see also archived version at https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/fall1999/entries/epistemology-virtue.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (2019). How to be an Epicurean: The ancient art of living well. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Alfano, M. (2013). The most agreeable of all vices: Nietzsche as virtue epistemologist. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21(4), 767–90.Google Scholar
Allen, A. (2017). Awaiting education: Friedrich Nietzsche on the future of our educational institutions. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 24(3), 197–210.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, K. (1994). An introduction to Nietzsche as political thinker: The perfect nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, K. (1996). Nietzsche contra Rousseau: A study of Nietzsche’s moral and political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appel, F. (2019). Nietzsche contra democracy. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. N. (2015). Is Nietzsche a virtue theorist?. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 49(3), 369–386.Google Scholar
Brobjer, T. H. (2003). Nietzsche’s affirmative morality: An ethics of virtue. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 26(1), 64–78.Google Scholar
Callard, A. (2018). Aspiration: The agency of becoming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (2002). Nietzsche’s antidemocratic rhetoric. In Richard, W. (Ed.), Nietzsche (pp. 479–502). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conant, J. (2001). Nietzsche’s perfectionism: A reading of Schopenhauer as Educator. In Schacht, R. (Ed.), Nietzsche’s postmoralism (pp. 181–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, D. (2005). Nietzsche and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daigle, C. (2006). Nietzsche: Virtue ethics… Virtue politics?. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 32(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Detwiler, B. (1990). Nietzsche and the politics of aristocratic radicalism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, J. (2005). Nietzsche contra “self-reformulation”. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24(2), 85–111.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (2006[1973]). Nietzsche: The revaluation of all values. In Richardson, J. & Leiter, B. (Eds.), Nietzsche (pp. 210–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golob, S. (2020). Exemplars, institutions, and self-knowledge in Schopenhauer as Educator. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 51(1), 46–66.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. H. (2005). Nietzsche and the origin of virtue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janaway, C. (1998). Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s educator. In Janaway, C. (Ed.), Willing and nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s educator (pp. 13–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. (2016). Advancing equality and individual excellence. The case of Nietzsche’s “Schopenhauer as educator”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 33(2), 173–192.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. (2018). Nietzsche on inequality, education, and human flourishing. In Smeyer, P. (Ed.), International handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 295–304). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. E., & Nakazawa, Y. (2020). A Platonic theory of moral education: Cultivating virtue in contemporary democratic classrooms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jonas, M. E., & Yacek, D. W. (2018). Nietzsche’s philosophy of education: Rethinking ethics, equality and the good life in a democratic age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kahan, A. (2012). Arnold, Nietzsche and the aristocratic vision. History of Political Thought, 33(1), 125–143.Google Scholar
Kain, P. J. (2009). Nietzsche, virtue and the horror of existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(1), 153–167.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (2013[1968]). Nietzsche: Philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2018). Epiphanic moral conversions: Going beyond Kohlberg and Aristotle. In Frey, J. A. & Vogler, C. (Eds.), Self-transcendence and virtue (pp. 15–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemm, V. (2007). Is Nietzsche a perfectionist? Rawls, Cavell, and the politics of culture in Nietzsche’s “Schopenhauer as Educator”. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 34, 5–27.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, R. S. (1971). Ethics and education. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. J. (2020). Transformative science education: Change how your students experience the world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Phillips, M. M., & Perez, T. (2015). Supporting the development of transformative experience and interest. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, 369–383.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rowthorn, D. (2017). Nietzsche’s cultural elitism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47(1), 97–115.Google Scholar
Sanderse, W. (2013). The meaning of role modelling in moral and character education. Journal of moral education, 42(1), 28–42.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Living with Nietzsche: What the great immoralist has to teach us. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, M. (1998). Nietzsche and virtue ethics. International Studies in Philosophy, 30(3), 23–27.Google Scholar
Strike, K. A. (2005). Trust, traditions, and pluralism: Human flourishing and liberal polity. In Carr, D. & Steutel, J. (Eds.), Virtue ethics and moral education (pp. 224–237). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. (1998). Outline of a Nietzschean virtue ethics. International Studies in Philosophy, 30(3), 29–38.Google Scholar
Thiele, L. P. (2020). Friedrich Nietzsche and the politics of the soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yacek, D. (2021). The transformative classroom: Philosophical foundations and practical applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (2017). Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Beiser, F. (2009). The genesis of Neo-Kantianism (1796–1880). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Formosa, P. (2012). From discipline to autonomy: Kant’s theory of moral development. In Roth, K. & Surprenant, C. (Eds), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 163–176.) New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frierson, P. (2013). Kant on the human being. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geisinger, J. (2010). Kant’s account of moral education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(4), 775–786.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (1993). The practice of moral judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (2007a). Can virtue be taught? The problem of new moral facts. In Herman, B. (Ed.), Moral literacy (pp. 106–129). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (2007b). Training to autonomy: Kant and the question of moral education. In Herman, B. (Ed.), Moral literacy (pp. 130–153). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1777). Of the standard of taste. In Hume, D. (Ed.), Essays, moral, political, and literary. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2006). The education of the categorical imperative Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 25, 385–402.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2008). Moral law and moral education: Defending Kantian autonomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2009). Prioritizing rights in the social justice curriculum. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, 119–133.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2012). Kant as moral psychologist? In Roth, K. & Surprenant, C. (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 177–192). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2013). Kant’s philosophy: A study for educators. London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (2019). Kant and prejudice, or the mechanical use of reason. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992a). The Vienna logic. In Young, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Lectures on logic (pp. 249–378). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992b). The Jäsche logic. In Young, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Lectures on logic (pp. 521–564). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996a). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In Gregor, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy, 4 (pp. 37–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996b). Critique of practical reason. In Gregor, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy, 5 (pp. 133–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996c). Metaphysics of morals. In Gregor, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy, 6 (pp. 353–504). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996d). On the common saying, that may be correct in theory, but is of no use in practice. In Gregor, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy, 8 (pp. 273–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996e). An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment? In Gregor, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy, 8 (pp. 11–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment, 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007a). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. In Louden, R. B. & Zöller, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, history, and education, 7. (pp. 227–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007b). Letters on the Philanthropinum. In Louden, R. B. & Zöller, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, history, and education, 2 (pp. 100–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007c). Lectures on pedagogy. In Louden, R. B. & Zöller, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, history, and education, 9 (pp. 434–485). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. (2000). Kant: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, R. (2000). Kant’s impure ethics: From rational beings to human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, R. (2016). Total transformation: Why Kant did not give up on education. Kantian Review, 21(3), 393–413.Google Scholar
Løvlie, L. (2011). Understanding agency and educating character. Educational Theory, 61(3), 257–274.Google Scholar
Lyotard, F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. G. Bennington & B. Massumi (trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Makreel, R., & Luft, S. (Eds.), (2009). Neo-Kantianism in contemporary philosophy. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Meld Shell, S. (2012). Kant on the humanities. In Roth, K. & Surprenant, C. (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 193–213). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moran, K. (2009) Can Kant have an account of moral education? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(4), 471–494.Google Scholar
Moran, K. (2012). Community and progress in Kant’s moral philosophy. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Munzel, F. (1999) Kant’s conception of moral character: The “critical” link of morality, anthropology, and reflective judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Munzel, F. (2003). Kant on moral education, or “enlightenment” and the liberal arts. Review of Metaphysics, 57(1), 43–73.Google Scholar
Munzel, F. (2013) Kant’s conception of pedagogy: Toward education for freedom. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Okshevsky, W. (2000). Kant’s catechism for moral education: From particularity through universality to morality. Philosophy of Education, 94–102.Google Scholar
Pleines, J.-E. (1985). Kant und die Pädagogik: Pädagogik und Praktischen Philosophie. Würtburg, Germany: Konighausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2000). Lectures on the history of moral philosophy. Herman, B. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Surprenant, C. (2010). Kant’s contribution to moral education: The relevance of catechistic. Journal of Moral Education, 39(2), 165–174.Google Scholar
Surprenant, C. (2012). Kant’s contribution to moral education. In Roth, K. & Surprenant, C. (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 1–11). New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Weiskopff, T. (1971). Kant und die Pädagogik: Beiträge zu einer Monographie. Zürich, Switzerland: EZ Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×