Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging

Section 4 - Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2021

Edited by

Sudhakar Selvaraj ,

Paolo Brambilla and

Jair C. Soares

Show author details

Sudhakar Selvaraj: Affiliation:
UTHealth School of Medicine, USA
Paolo Brambilla: Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Jair C. Soares: Affiliation:
UT Harris County Psychiatric Center, USA

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: Mood Disorders
Brain Imaging and Therapeutic Implications
, pp. 135 - 218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108623018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, JH, Smoller, JW. The genetics of bipolar disorder. Neuroscience. 2009; 164(1): 331–343.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McGuffin, P, Rijsdijk, F, Andrew, M et al. The heritability of bipolar affective disorder and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003; 60(5): 497–502.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jansen, R, Penninx, BWJH, Madar, V, et al. Gene expression in major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatr. 2016; 21(3): 339–347.Google Scholar

Hamet, P, Tremblay, J. Genetics and genomics of depression. Metabolism. 2005; 54 (5 Suppl 1): 10–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chen, G, Henter, ID, Manji, HK. Translational research in bipolar disorder: Emerging insights from genetically based models. Mol Psychiatry. 2010; 15(9): 883–895.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goes, FS. Genetics of bipolar disorder: Recent update and future directions. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016; 39(1): 139–155.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bogdan, R, Salmeron, BJ, Carey, CE, et al. Imaging genetics and genomics in psychiatry: A critical review of progress and potential. Biological Psychiatry. 2017; 82(3): 165–175.Google Scholar

Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Weinberger, DR. Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(10): 818–827.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fusar-Poli, P, Howes, O, Bechdolf, A, Borgwardt, S. Mapping vulnerability to bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2012; 37(3): 170–184.Google Scholar

Piguet, C, Fodoulian, L, Aubry, JM, Vuilleumier, P, Houenou, J. Bipolar disorder: Functional neuroimaging markers in relatives. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 57: 284–296.Google Scholar

Dima, D, Roberts, RE, Frangou, S. Connectomic markers of disease expression, genetic risk and resilience in bipolar disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2016; 6: e706.Google Scholar

Amico, F, Meisenzahl, E, Koutsouleris, N, et al. Structural MRI correlates for vulnerability and resilience to major depressive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011; 36(1): 15–22.Google Scholar

Huang, H, Fan, X, Williamson, DE, Rao, U. White matter changes in healthy adolescents at familial risk for unipolar depression: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(3): 684–691.Google Scholar

Kerner, B. Toward a deeper understanding of the genetics of bipolar disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2015; 6: 105.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sullivan, P, Wray, N, Consortium, PM. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depressive disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharm. 2019; 29: S805.Google Scholar

Direk, N, Williams, S, Smith, JA, et al. An analysis of two genome-wide association meta-analyses identifies a new locus for broad depression phenotype. Biol Psychiat. 2017; 82(5): 322–329.Google Scholar

Hyde, CL, Nagle, MW, Tian, C, et al. Identification of 15 genetic loci associated with risk of major depression in individuals of European descent. Nature Genetics. 2016 September; 48(9): 1031–1036.Google Scholar

Ikeda, M, Saito, T, Kondo, K, Iwata, N. Genome-wide association studies of bipolar disorder: A systematic review of recent findings and their clinical implications. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018; 72(2): 52–63.Google Scholar

Leal-Ortiz, S, Waites, CL, Terry-Lorenzo, R, et al. Piccolo modulation of Synapsin1a dynamics regulates synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Journal of Cell Biology. 2008; 181(5): 831–846.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schuhmacher, A, Mossner, R, Hofels, S, et al. PCLO rs2522833 modulates HPA system response to antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychoph. 2011; 14(2): 237–245.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Igata, R, Katsuki, A, Kakeda, S, et al. PCLO rs2522833-mediated gray matter volume reduction in patients with drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2017 May 30; 7(5): e1140.Google Scholar

Ryan, J, Artero, S, Carriere, I, et al. GWAS-identified risk variants for major depressive disorder: Preliminary support for an association with late-life depressive symptoms and brain structural alterations. Eur Neuropsychopharm. 2016; 26(1): 113–125.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Woudstra, S, Bochdanovits, Z, van Tol, MJ, et al. Piccolo genotype modulates neural correlates of emotion processing but not executive functioning. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Woudstra, S, van Tol, MJ, Bochdanovits, Z, et al. Modulatory effects of the piccolo genotype on emotional memory in health and depression. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4): e61494.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schott, BH, Assmann, A, Schmierer, P, et al. Epistatic interaction of genetic depression risk variants in the human subgenual cingulate cortex during memory encoding. Transl Psychiatry. 2014; 4: e372.Google Scholar

Lewis, CM, Ng, MY, Butler, AW, et al. Genome-wide association study of major recurrent depression in the UK population. Am J Psychiat. 2010; 167(8): 949–957.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bermingham, R, Carballedo, A, Lisiecka, D, et al. Effect of genetic variant in BICC1 on functional and structural brain changes in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 37(13): 2855–2862.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dannlowski, U, Kugel, H, Grotegerd, D, et al. NCAN cross-disorder risk variant is associated with limbic gray matter deficits in healthy subjects and major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 40(11): 2510–2516.Google Scholar

Kim, BJ, Zaveri, HP, Shchelochkov, OA, et al. An allelic series of mice reveals a role for RERE in the development of multiple organs affected in chromosome 1p36 deletions. Plos One. 2013; 8(2): e57460.Google Scholar

Kakeda, S, Watanabe, K, Katsuki, A, et al. Genetic effects on white matter integrity in drug-naive patients with major depressive disorder: A diffusion tensor imaging study of 17 genetic loci associated with depressive symptoms. Neuropsych Dis Treat. 2019; 15: 375–383.Google Scholar

Han, KM, Won, E, Kang, J, et al. TESC gene-regulating genetic variant (rs7294919) affects hippocampal subfield volumes and parahippocampal cingulum white matter integrity in major depressive disorder. J Psychiat Res. 2017; 93: 20–29.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cui, LL, Gong, XH, Tang, YQ, et al. Relationship between the LHPP gene polymorphism and resting-state brain activity in major depressive disorder. Neural Plasticity. 2016: 9162590.Google Scholar

Ota, M, Hori, H, Sato, N, et al. Effects of ankyrin 3 gene risk variants on brain structures in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy subjects. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016; 70(11): 498–506.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lippard, ETC, Jensen, KP, Wang, F, et al. Genetic variation of ANK3 is associated with lower white matter structural integrity in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2017; 22(9): 1225.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Delvecchio, G, Dima, D, Frangou, S. The effect of ANK3 bipolar-risk polymorphisms on the working memory circuitry differs between loci and according to risk-status for bipolar disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2015; 168B(3): 188–196.Google Scholar

Tesli, M, Egeland, R, Sonderby, IE, et al. No evidence for association between bipolar disorder risk gene variants and brain structural phenotypes. J Affect Disord. 2013; 151(1): 291–297.Google Scholar

Falls, DL. Neuregulins: Functions, forms, and signaling strategies. Exp Cell Res. 2003; 284(1): 14–30.Google Scholar

Cannon, DM, Walshe, M, Dempster, E, et al. The association of white matter volume in psychotic disorders with genotypic variation in NRG1, MOG and CNP: A voxel-based analysis in affected individuals and their unaffected relatives. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e167.Google Scholar

Mechelli, A, Prata, DP, Fu, CH, et al. The effects of neuregulin1 on brain function in controls and patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(2): 817–826.Google Scholar

Gomez-Ospina, N, Tsuruta, F, Barreto-Chang, O, Hu, L, Dolmetsch, R. The C terminus of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(V)1.2 encodes a transcription factor. Cell. 2006; 127(3): 591–606.Google Scholar

Green, EK, Grozeva, D, Jones, I, et al. The bipolar disorder risk allele at CACNA1C also confers risk of recurrent major depression and of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatr. 2010; 15(10): 1016–1022.Google Scholar

Krug, A, Nieratschker, V, Markov, V, et al. Effect of CACNA1C rs1006737 on neural correlates of verbal fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroimage. 2010; 49(2): 1831–1836.Google Scholar

Thimm, M, Kircher, T, Kellermann, T, et al. Effects of a CACNA1C genotype on attention networks in healthy individuals. Psychological Medicine. 2011; 41(7): 1551–1561.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Backes, H, Dietsche, B, Nagels, A, et al. Genetic variation in CACNA1C affects neural processing in major depression. J Psychiat Res. 2014; 53: 38–46.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Soeiro-de-Souza, MG, Lafer, B, Moreno, RA, et al. The CACNA1C risk allele rs1006737 is associated with age-related prefrontal cortical thinning in bipolar I disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2017; 7(4): e1086.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Perrier, E, Pompei, F, Ruberto, G, et al. Initial evidence for the role of CACNA1 C on subcortical brain morphology in patients with bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2011; 26(3): 135–137.Google Scholar

Tesli, M, Skatun, KC, Ousdal, OT, et al. CACNA1C risk variant and amygdala activity in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and healthy controls. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e56970.Google Scholar

Dima, D, Jogia, J, Collier, D, et al. Independent modulation of engagement and connectivity of the facial network during affect processing by CACNA1C and ANK3 risk genes for bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013; 70(12): 1303–1311.Google Scholar

Jogia, J, Ruberto, G, Lelli-Chiesa, G, et al. The impact of the CACNA1C gene polymorphism on frontolimbic function in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2011; 16(11): 1070–1071.Google Scholar

Whalley, HC, McKirdy, J, Romaniuk, L, et al. Functional imaging of emotional memory in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Bipolar Disord. 2009; 11(8): 840–856.Google Scholar

Bigos, KL, Mattay, VS, Callicott, JH, et al. Genetic variation in CACNA1C affects brain circuitries related to mental illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(9): 939–945.Google Scholar

Tecelao, D, Mendes, A, Martins, D, et al. The effect of psychosis associated CACNA1C, and its epistasis with ZNF804A, on brain function. Genes Brain Behav. 2019; 18(4): e12510.Google Scholar

Mallas, E, Carletti, F, Chaddock, CA, et al. The impact of CACNA1C gene, and its epistasis with ZNF804A, on white matter microstructure in health, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder(1). Genes Brain Behav. 2017; 16(4): 479–488.Google Scholar

Soeiro-de-Souza, MG, Otaduy, MC, Dias, CZ, et al.The impact of the CACNA1C risk allele on limbic structures and facial emotions recognition in bipolar disorder subjects and healthy controls. J Affect Disord. 2012; 141(1): 94–101.Google Scholar

Wolf, C, Mohr, H, Schneider-Axmann, T, et al. CACNA1 C genotype explains interindividual differences in amygdala volume among patients with schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014; 264(2): 93–102.Google Scholar

Radua, J, Surguladze, SA, Marshall, N, et al. The impact of CACNA1C allelic variation on effective connectivity during emotional processing in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2013; 18(5): 526–527.Google Scholar

Byrne, EM, Carrillo-Roa, T, Penninx, BW, et al. Applying polygenic risk scores to postpartum depression. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014; 17(6): 519–528.Google Scholar

Levine, ME, Crimmins, EM, Prescott, CA, et al. A polygenic risk score associated with measures of depressive symptoms among older adults. Biodemogr Soc Biol. 2014; 60(2): 199–211.Google Scholar

Mullins, N, Power, RA, Fisher, HL, et al. Polygenic interactions with environmental adversity in the aetiology of major depressive disorder. Psychological Medicine. 2016; 46(4): 759–770.Google Scholar

Holmes, AJ, Lee, PH, Hollinshead, MO, et al. Individual differences in amygdala-medial prefrontal anatomy link negative affect, impaired social functioning, and polygenic depression risk. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32(50): 18087–18100.Google Scholar

Whalley, HC, Sprooten, E, Hackett, S, et al. Polygenic risk and white matter integrity in individuals at high risk of mood disorder. Biol Psychiat. 2013; 74(4): 280–286.Google Scholar

Yuksel, D, Dietsche, B, Forstner, AJ, et al. Polygenic risk for depression and the neural correlates of working memory in healthy subjects. Prog Neuro-Psychoph. 2017; 79: 67–76.Google Scholar

Reus, LM, Shen, X, Gibson, J, et al. Association of polygenic risk for major psychiatric illness with subcortical volumes and white matter integrity in UK Biobank. Sci Rep-Uk. 2017; 7: 42140.Google Scholar

Wigmore, EM, Clarke, TK, Howard, DM, et al. Do regional brain volumes and major depressive disorder share genetic architecture? A study of Generation Scotland (n=19762), UK Biobank (n=24048) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=5766). Transl Psychiatry. 2017 August 15; 7(8): e1205.Google Scholar

Wang, T, Zhang, X, Li, A, et al. Polygenic risk for five psychiatric disorders and cross-disorder and disorder-specific neural connectivity in two independent populations. NeuroImage Clinical. 2017; 14: 441–449.Google Scholar

Tesli, M, Kauppi, K, Bettella, F, et al. Altered brain activation during emotional face processing in relation to both diagnosis and polygenic risk of bipolar disorder. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0134202.Google Scholar

Dima, D, Breen, G. Polygenic risk scores in imaging genetics: Usefulness and applications. J Psychopharmacol. 2015; 29(8): 867–871.Google Scholar

Whalley, HC, Papmeyer, M, Sprooten, E, et al. The influence of polygenic risk for bipolar disorder on neural activation assessed using fMRI. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e130.Google Scholar

Caseras, X, Tansey, KE, Foley, S, Linden, D. Association between genetic risk scoring for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with regional subcortical volumes. Transl Psychiatry. 2015; 5: e692.Google Scholar

Doan, NT, Kaufmann, T, Bettella, F, et al. Distinct multivariate brain morphological patterns and their added predictive value with cognitive and polygenic risk scores in mental disorders. Neuroimage Clin. 2017; 15: 719–731.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whalley, HC, Sprooten, E, Hackett, S, et al. Polygenic risk and white matter integrity in individuals at high risk of mood disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 74(4): 280–286.Google Scholar

Reus, LM, Shen, X, Gibson, J, et al. Association of polygenic risk for major psychiatric illness with subcortical volumes and white matter integrity in UK Biobank. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 42140.Google Scholar

Sprooten, E, Fleming, KM, Thomson, PA, et al. White matter integrity as an intermediate phenotype: Exploratory genome-wide association analysis in individuals at high risk of bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 206(2–3): 223–231.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Serretti, A, Cusin, C, Benedetti, F, et al. Insomnia improvement during antidepressant treatment and CLOCK gene polymorphism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005; 137B(1): 36–39.Google Scholar

Zai, CC, de Luca, V, Strauss, J, et al. Genetic factors and suicidal behavior. In: Dwivedi, Y, editor. The Neurobiological Basis of Suicide. Frontiers in Neuroscience. Boca Raton (FL) Florida, US: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012, p. 213.Google Scholar

Kenna, GA, Roder-Hanna, N, Leggio, L, et al. Association of the 5-HTT gene-linked promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism with psychiatric disorders: review of psychopathology and pharmacotherapy. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2012; 5: 19–35.Google Scholar

Smeraldi, E, Benedetti, F, Zanardi, R. Serotonin transporter promoter genotype and illness recurrence in mood disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002; 12(1): 73–75.Google Scholar

Serretti, A, Kato, M, De Ronchi, D, Kinoshita, T. Meta-analysis of serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor efficacy in depressed patients. Mol Psychiatry. 2007; 12(3): 247–257.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Parra-Uribe, I, Blasco-Fontecilla, H, Garcia-Pares, G, et al. Risk of re-attempts and suicide death after a suicide attempt: A survival analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017; 17(1): 163.Google Scholar

Russ, MJ, Lachman, HM, Kashdan, T, Saito, T, Bajmakovic-Kacila, S. Analysis of catechol-O-methyltransferase and 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter polymorphisms in patients at risk for suicide. Psychiatry Res. 2000; 93(1): 73–78.Google Scholar

Murphy, SE, Norbury, R, Godlewska, BR, et al. The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: A meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2013; 18(4): 512–520.Google Scholar

Munafo, MR, Brown, SM, Hariri, AR. Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and amygdala activation: A meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 63(9): 852–857.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pezawas, L, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Drabant, EM, et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: A genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(6): 828–834.Google Scholar

Jonassen, R, Landro, NI. Serotonin transporter polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR) in emotion processing: Implications from current neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol. 2014; 117: 41–53.Google Scholar

Frodl, T, Zill, P, Baghai, T, et al. Reduced hippocampal volumes associated with the long variant of the tri- and diallelic serotonin transporter polymorphism in major depression. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. 2008; 147B(7): 1003–1007.Google Scholar

Frodl, T, Meisenzahl, EM, Zill, P, et al. Reduced hippocampal volumes associated with the long variant of the serotonin transporter polymorphism in major depression. Arch Gen Psychiat. 2004; 61(2): 177–183.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, WD, Steffens, DC, Payne, ME, et al. Influence of serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphisms on hippocampal volumes in late-life depression. Arch Gen Psychiat. 2005; 62(5): 537–544.Google Scholar

Eker, MC, Kitis, O, Okur, H, et al. Smaller hippocampus volume is associated with short variant of 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in medication-free major depressive disorder patients. Neuropsychobiology. 2011; 63(1): 22–28.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hickie, IB, Naismith, SL, Ward, PB, et al. Serotonin transporter gene status predicts caudate nucleus but not amygdala or hippocampal volumes in older persons with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2007; 98(1–2): 137–142.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jaworska, N, MacMaster, FP, Foster, J, Ramasubbu, R. The influence of 5-HTTLPR and Val66 Met polymorphisms on cortical thickness and volume in limbic and paralimbic regions in depression: A preliminary study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16: 61.Google Scholar

Ahdidan, J, Foldager, L, Rosenberg, R, et al. Hippocampal volume and serotonin transporter polymorphism in major depressive disorder. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2013; 25(4): 206–214.Google Scholar

Cole, J, Weinberger, DR, Mattay, VS, et al. No effect of 5HTTLPR or BDNF Val66 Met polymorphism on hippocampal morphology in major depression. Genes, Brain, and Behavior. 2011; 10(7): 756–764.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, WD, Macfall, JR, Payne, ME, et al. Orbitofrontal cortex volume in late life depression: Influence of hyperintense lesions and genetic polymorphisms. Psychological Medicine. 2007; 37(12): 1763–1773.Google Scholar

Costafreda, SG, McCann, P, Saker, P, et al. Modulation of amygdala response and connectivity in depression by serotonin transporter polymorphism and diagnosis. J Affect Disorders. 2013; 150(1): 96–103.Google Scholar

Dannlowski, U, Ohrmann, P, Bauer, J, et al. 5-HTTLPR biases amygdala activity in response to masked facial expressions in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33(2): 418–424.Google Scholar

Friedel, E, Schlagenhauf, F, Sterzer, P, et al. 5-HTT genotype effect on prefrontal-amygdala coupling differs between major depression and controls. Psychopharmacology. 2009; 205(2): 261–271.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Bollettini, I, Poletti, S, et al. White matter microstructure in bipolar disorder is influenced by the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism 5-HTTLPR. Genes Brain Behav. 2015; 14(3): 238–250.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frodl, T, Reinhold, E, Koutsouleris, N, et al. Childhood stress, serotonin transporter gene and brain structures in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(6): 1383–1390.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, GS, Murphy, CF, Gunning-Dixon, FM, et al. Serotonin transporter polymorphisms, microstructural white matter abnormalities and remission of geriatric depression. J Affect Disorders. 2009; 119(1–3): 132–141.Google Scholar

Parsey, RV, Olvet, DM, Oquendo, MA, et al. Higher 5-HT1A receptor binding potential during a major depressive episode predicts poor treatment response: Preliminary data from a naturalistic study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006; 31(8): 1745–1749.Google Scholar

Lemonde, S, Turecki, G, Bakish, D, et al. Impaired repression at a 5-hydroxytryptamine 1 A receptor gene polymorphism associated with major depression and suicide. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2003; 23(25): 8788–8799.Google Scholar

Vai, B, Riberto, M, Ghiglino, D, et al. A 5-HT1Areceptor promoter polymorphism influences fronto-limbic functional connectivity and depression severity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017; 270: 1–7.Google Scholar

Bilder, RM, Volavka, J, Lachman, HM, Grace, AA. The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism: Relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004; 29(11): 1943–1961.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Dallaspezia, S, Colombo, C, et al. Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism on antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine. Eur Psychiatry. 2010; 25(8): 476–478.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Benedetti, F, Barbini, B, Bernasconi, A, et al. Acute antidepressant response to sleep deprivation combined with light therapy is influenced by the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism. J Affect Disord. 2010; 121(1–2): 68–72.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Dallaspezia, S, Locatelli, C, et al. Recurrence of bipolar mania is associated with catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism. J Affect Disord. 2011; 132(1–2): 293–296.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Dallaspezia, S, Colombo, C, et al. Association between catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism and psychotic features of bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2010; 125(1–3): 341–344.Google Scholar

Papolos, DF, Veit, S, Faedda, GL, Saito, T, Lachman, HM. Ultra-ultra rapid cycling bipolar disorder is associated with the low activity catecholamine-O-methyltransferase allele. Mol Psychiatry. 1998; 3(4): 346–349.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seok, JH, Choi, S, Lim, HK, et al. Effect of the COMT val158 met polymorphism on white matter connectivity in patients with major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2013; 545: 35–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayashi, K, Yoshimura, R, Kakeda, S, et al. COMT Val158 Met, but not BDNF Val66 Met, is associated with white matter abnormalities of the temporal lobe in patients with first-episode, treatment-naive major depressive disorder: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuropsych Dis Treat. 2014; 10: 1183–1190.Google Scholar

Watanabe, K, Kakeda, S, Yoshimura, R, et al. Relationship between the catechol-O-methyl transferase Va1108/158 Met genotype and brain volume in treatment-naive major depressive disorder: Voxel-based morphometry analysis. Psychiat Res-Neuroim. 2015; 233(3): 481–487.Google Scholar

Opmeer, EM, Kortekaas, R, van Tol, MJ, et al. Influence of COMT val158 met genotype on the depressed brain during emotional processing and working memory. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9): e73290.Google Scholar

Vai, B, Riberto, M, Poletti, S, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase Val (108/158) Met polymorphism affects fronto-limbic connectivity during emotional processing in bipolar disorder. European Psychiatry. 2017; 41: 53–59.Google Scholar

Miskowiak, KW, Kjaerstad, HL, Stottrup, MM, et al. The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158 Met genotype modulates working memory-related dorsolateral prefrontal response and performance in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2017; 19(3): 214–224.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hempstead, BL. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Three ligands, many actions. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015; 126: 9–19.Google Scholar PubMed

Notaras, M, Hill, R, van den Buuse, M. The BDNF gene Val66 Met polymorphism as a modifier of psychiatric disorder susceptibility: Progress and controversy. Mol Psychiatry. 2015; 20(8): 916–930.Google Scholar

Ide, S, Kakeda, S, Watanabe, K, et al. Relationship between a BDNF gene polymorphism and the brain volume in treatment-naive patients with major depressive disorder: A VBM analysis of brain MRI. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 233(2): 120–124.Google Scholar

Legge, RM, Sendi, S, Cole, JH, et al. Modulatory effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66 Met polymorphism on prefrontal regions in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2015; 206(5): 379–384.Google Scholar

Frodl, T, Schule, C, Schmitt, G, et al. Association of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66 Met polymorphism with reduced hippocampal volumes in major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64(4): 410–416.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carballedo, A, Morris, D, Zill, P, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66 Met polymorphism and early life adversity affect hippocampal volume. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013; 162B(2): 183–190.Google Scholar

Youssef, MM, Underwood, MD, Huang, YY, et al. Association of BDNF Val66 Met polymorphism and brain BDNF levels with major depression and suicide. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21(6): 528–538.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, GS, Glatt, CE, Hoptman, MJ, et al. BDNF val66 met polymorphism, white matter abnormalities and remission of geriatric depression. J Affect Disord. 2010; 125(1–3): 262–268.Google Scholar

Han, KM, Choi, S, Kim, A, et al. The effects of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF Val66 Met polymorphisms on neurostructural changes in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2018; 273: 25–34.Google Scholar

Tatham, EL, Hall, GBC, Clark, D, Foster, J, Ramasubbu, R. The 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms moderate the association between uncinate fasciculus connectivity and antidepressants treatment response in major depression. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2017; 267(2): 135–147.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yin, YY, Hou, ZH, Wang, XQ, Sui, YX, Yuan, YG. The BDNF Val66 Met polymorphism, resting-state hippocampal functional connectivity and cognitive deficits in acute late-onset depression. J Affect Disorders. 2015; 183: 22–30.Google Scholar

Opmeer, EM, Kortekaas, R, van Tol, MJ, et al. Influence of COMT val158 met genotype on the depressed brain during emotional processing and working memory. Plos One. 2013 September 12; 8(9): e73290.Google Scholar

Gonul, AS, Kitis, O, Eker, MC, et al. Association of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66 Met polymorphism with hippocampus volumes in drug-free depressed patients. World J Biol Psychia. 2011; 12(2): 110–118.Google Scholar

Kanellopoulos, D, Gunning, FM, Morimoto, SS, et al. Hippocampal volumes and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66 met polymorphism in geriatric major depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011; 19(1): 13–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao, B, Bauer, IE, Sharma, AN, et al. Reduced hippocampus volume and memory performance in bipolar disorder patients carrying the BDNF val66 met met allele. J Affect Disord. 2016; 198: 198–205.Google Scholar

Chepenik, LG, Fredericks, C, Papademetris, X, et al. Effects of the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor val66 met variation on hippocampus morphology in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 34(4): 944–951.CrossRef Google Scholar

Matsuo, K, Walss-Bass, C, Nery, FG, et al. Neuronal correlates of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66 Met polymorphism and morphometric abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 34(8): 1904–1913.Google Scholar

Mirakhur, A, Moorhead, TW, Stanfield, AC, et al. Changes in gyrification over 4 years in bipolar disorder and their association with the brain-derived neurotrophic factor valine(66) methionine variant. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 66(3): 293–297.Google Scholar

Zeni, CP, Mwangi, B, Cao, B, et al. Interaction between BDNF rs6265 Met allele and low family cohesion is associated with smaller left hippocampal volume in pediatric bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2016; 189: 94–97.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mandolini, GM, Lazzaretti, M, Pigoni, A, et al. The impact of BDNF Val66 Met polymorphism on cognition in bipolar disorder: A review: Special section on “translational and neuroscience studies in affective disorders” section editor, Maria Nobile MD, PhD. This section of JAD focuses on the relevance of translational and neuroscience studies in providing a better understanding of the neural basis of affective disorders. The main aim is to briefly summaries relevant research findings in clinical neuroscience with particular regards to specific innovative topics in mood and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2019; 243: 552–558.Google Scholar

Fernandes, BS, Molendijk, ML, Kohler, CA, et al. Peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a biomarker in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of 52 studies. BMC Med. 2015; 13: 289.Google Scholar

Chen, J, Xu, Y, Zhang, J, et al. Genotypic association of the DAOA gene with resting-state brain activity in major depression. Mol Neurobiol. 2012; 46(2): 361–373.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Choi, S, Han, KM, Kang, J, et al. Effects of a polymorphism of the neuronal amino acid transporter SLC6A15 gene on structural integrity of white matter tracts in major depressive disorder. Plos One. 2016 October 10; 11(10): e0164301.Google Scholar

Wang, LJ, Liu, ZF, Cao, XH, et al. A combined study of SLC6A15 gene polymorphism and the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in first-episode drug-naive major depressive disorder. Genet Test Mol Bioma. 2017; 21(9): 523–530.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Poletti, S, Riberto, M, Vai, B, et al. A glutamate transporter EAAT1 gene variant influences amygdala functional connectivity in bipolar disorder. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2018; 65(4): 536–545.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Poletti, S, Bollettini, I, Lorenzi, C, et al. White matter microstructure in bipolar disorder is influenced by the interaction between a glutamate transporter EAAT1 gene variant and early stress. Molecular Neurobiology. 2018: 1–9.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Poletti, S, Locatelli, C, et al. A Homer 1 gene variant influences brain structure and function, lithium effects on white matter, and antidepressant response in bipolar disorder: A multimodal genetic imaging study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2018; 81: 88–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Poletti, S, Locatelli, C, et al. A Homer 1 gene variant influences brain structure and function, lithium effects on white matter, and antidepressant response in bipolar disorder: A multimodal genetic imaging study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 81: 88–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bollettini, I, Melloni, EMT, Aggio, V, et al. Clock genes associate with white matter integrity in depressed bipolar patients. Chronobiology International. 2017; 34(2): 212–224.Google Scholar

Poletti, S, Aggio, V, Bollettini, I, et al. SREBF-2 polymorphism influences white matter microstructure in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2016; 257: 39–46.Google Scholar

Grimes, CA, Jope, RS. CREB DNA binding activity is inhibited by glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and facilitated by lithium. J Neurochem. 2001; 78(6): 1219–1232.Google Scholar

Inkster, B, Nichols, TE, Saemann, PG, et al. Association of GSK3beta polymorphisms with brain structural changes in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009; 66(7): 721–728.Google Scholar

Inkster, B, Simmons, A, Cole, JH, et al. Unravelling the GSK3 beta-related genotypic interaction network influencing hippocampal volume in recurrent major depressive disorder. Psychiatric Genetics. 2018; 28(5): 77–84.Google Scholar

Liu, Z, Guo, H, Cao, XH, et al. A combined study of GSK3 beta polymorphisms and brain network topological metrics in major depressive disorder. Psychiat Res-Neuroim. 2014; 223(3): 210–217.Google Scholar

Inkster, B, Nichols, TE, Saemann, PG, et al. Pathway-based approaches to imaging genetics association studies: Wnt signaling, GSK3beta substrates and major depression. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(3): 908–917.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Serretti, A, Colombo, C, et al. A glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta promoter gene single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with age at onset and response to total sleep deprivation in bipolar depression. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 368(2): 123–126.Google Scholar

Benedetti, F, Bollettini, I, Barberi, I, et al. Lithium and GSK3-β promoter gene variants influence white matter microstructure in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38(2): 313.Google Scholar

Horstmann, S, Lucae, S, Menke, A, et al. Polymorphisms in GRIK4, HTR2A, and FKBP5 show interactive effects in predicting remission to antidepressant treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(3): 727–740.Google Scholar

Binder, EB, Salyakina, D, Lichtner, P, et al. Polymorphisms in FKBP5 are associated with increased recurrence of depressive episodes and rapid response to antidepressant treatment. Nat Genet. 2004; 36(12): 1319–1325.Google Scholar

Pace, TW, Miller, AH. Cytokines and glucocorticoid receptor signaling. Relevance to major depression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1179: 86–105.Google Scholar

Cordova-Palomera, A, de Reus, MA, Fatjo-Vilas, M, et al. FKBP5 modulates the hippocampal connectivity deficits in depression: A study in twins. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 11(1): 62–75.Google Scholar

Tozzi, L, Carballedo, A, Wetterling, F, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism of the FKBP5 gene and childhood maltreatment as predictors of structural changes in brain areas involved in emotional processing in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 41(2): 487–497.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Han, KM, Won, E, Sim, Y, et al. Influence of FKBP5 polymorphism and DNA methylation on structural changes of the brain in major depressive disorder. Sci Rep-Uk. 2017; 7.Google Scholar

Tozzi, L, Doolin, K, Farrel, C, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of emotion recognition and voluntary attentional regulation in depression: A generalized psycho-physiological interaction study. J Affect Disorders. 2017; 208: 535–544.Google Scholar

Qiu, AQ, Taylor, WD, Zhao, Z, et al. APOE related hippocampal shape alteration in geriatric depression. Neuroimage. 2009; 44(3): 620–626.Google Scholar

Kim, DH, Payne, ME, Levy, RM, MacFall, JR, Steffens, DC. APOE genotype and hippocampal volume change in geriatric depression. Biol Psychiat. 2002; 51(5): 426–429.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sachs-Ericsson, N, Sawyer, K, Corsentino, E, Collins, N, Steffens, DC. The moderating effect of the APOE epsilon 4 allele on the relationship between hippocampal volume and cognitive decline in older depressed patients. Am J Geriat Psychiat. 2011; 19(1): 23–32.Google Scholar

Yuan, YG, Zhang, ZJ, Bai, F, et al. Genetic variation in apolipoprotein E alters regional gray matter volumes in remitted late-onset depression. J Affect Disorders. 2010; 121(3): 273–277.Google Scholar

Shu, H, Yuan, YG, Xie, CM, et al. Imbalanced hippocampal functional networks associated with remitted geriatric depression and apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele in nondemented elderly: A preliminary study. J Affect Disorders. 2014; 164: 5–13.Google Scholar

Wu, D, Yuan, YG, Ba, F, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity of the default mode network in remitted late-onset depression. J Affect Disorders. 2013; 147(1–3): 277–287.Google Scholar

Chang, KJ, Hong, CH, Lee, KS, et al. Differential effects of white matter hyperintensity on geriatric depressive symptoms according to APOE-epsilon 4 status. J Affect Disorders. 2015; 188: 28–34.Google Scholar

Lavretsky, H, Lesser, IM, Wohl, M, et al. Apolipoprotein-E and white matter hyperintensities in late-life depression. Am J Geriat Psychiat. 2000; 8(3): 257–261.Google Scholar

Turecki, G, Ota, VK, Belangero, SI, Jackowski, A, Kaufman, J. Early life adversity, genomic plasticity, and psychopathology. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014; 1(6): 461–466.Google Scholar

Lutz, PE, Turecki, G. DNA methylation and childhood maltreatment: From animal models to human studies. Neuroscience. 2014; 264: 142–156.Google Scholar

Szyf, M. The early life social environment and DNA methylation: DNA methylation mediating the long-term impact of social environments early in life. Epigenetics. 2011; 6(8): 971–978.Google Scholar

Caspi, A, Hariri, AR, Holmes, A, Uher, R, Moffitt, TE. Genetic sensitivity to the environment: The case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167(5): 509–527.Google Scholar

Philibert, RA, Sandhu, H, Hollenbeck, N, et al. The relationship of 5HTT (SLC6A4) methylation and genotype on mRNA expression and liability to major depression and alcohol dependence in subjects from the Iowa adoption studies. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008; 147B(5): 543–549.Google Scholar

Okada, S, Morinobu, S, Fuchikami, M, et al. The potential of SLC6A4 gene methylation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment of major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2014; 53: 47–53.Google Scholar

Domschke, K, Tidow, N, Schwarte, K, et al. Serotonin transporter gene hypomethylation predicts impaired antidepressant treatment response. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 17(8): 1167–1176.Google Scholar

Olsson, CA, Foley, DL, Parkinson-Bates, M, et al. Prospects for epigenetic research within cohort studies of psychological disorder: A pilot investigation of a peripheral cell marker of epigenetic risk for depression. Biol Psychol. 2010; 83(2): 159–165.Google Scholar

Kang, HJ, Kim, JM, Stewart, R, et al. Association of SLC6A4 methylation with early adversity, characteristics and outcomes in depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 44: 23–28.Google Scholar

Sugawara, H, Iwamoto, K, Bundo, M, et al. Hypermethylation of serotonin transporter gene in bipolar disorder detected by epigenome analysis of discordant monozygotic twins. Transl Psychiatry. 2011; 1: e24.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Won, E, Choi, S, Kang, J, et al. Association between reduced white matter integrity in the corpus callosum and serotonin transporter gene DNA methylation in medication-naive patients with major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2016; 6(8): e866.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Booij, L, Szyf, M, Carballedo, A, et al. DNA methylation of the serotonin transporter gene in peripheral cells and stress-related changes in hippocampal volume: A study in depressed patients and healthy controls. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3): e0119061.Google Scholar

Kaer, K, Speek, M. Retroelements in human disease. Gene. 2013; 518(2): 231–241.Google Scholar

Schneider, I, Kugel, H, Redlich, R, et al. Association of serotonin transporter gene AluJb methylation with major depression, amygdala responsiveness, 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 polymorphism, and stress. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(6): 1308–1316.Google Scholar

Na, KS, Won, E, Kang, J, et al. Differential effect of COMT gene methylation on the prefrontal connectivity in subjects with depression versus healthy subjects. Neuropharmacology. 2018; 137: 59–70.Google Scholar

Tyrka, AR, Ridout, KK, Parade, SH. Childhood adversity and epigenetic regulation of glucocorticoid signaling genes: Associations in children and adults. Dev Psychopathol. 2016; 28(4pt2): 1319–1331.Google Scholar

Tozzi, L, Farrell, C, Booij, L, et al. Epigenetic changes of FKBP5 as a link connecting genetic and environmental risk factors with structural and functional brain changes in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(5): 1138–1145.Google Scholar

Han, KM, Won, E, Sim, Y, et al. Influence of FKBP5 polymorphism and DNA methylation on structural changes of the brain in major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 42621.Google Scholar

Na, KS, Chang, HS, Won, E, et al. Association between glucocorticoid receptor methylation and hippocampal subfields in major depressive disorder. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1): e85425.Google Scholar

Palma-Gudiel, H, Cordova-Palomera, A, Tornador, C, et al. Increased methylation at an unexplored glucocorticoid responsive element within exon 1D of NR3C1 gene is related to anxious-depressive disorders and decreased hippocampal connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 28(5): 579–588.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fuchikami, M, Morinobu, S, Segawa, M, et al. DNA methylation profiles of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene as a potent diagnostic biomarker in major depression. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8): e23881.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tadic, A, Muller-Engling, L, Schlicht, KF, et al. Methylation of the promoter of brain-derived neurotrophic factor exon IV and antidepressant response in major depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; 19(3): 281–283.Google Scholar

Kang, HJ, Kim, JM, Lee, JY, et al. BDNF promoter methylation and suicidal behavior in depressive patients. J Affect Disord. 2013; 151(2): 679–685.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martinowich, K, Hattori, D, Wu, H, et al. DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science. 2003; 302(5646): 890–893.Google Scholar

Choi, S, Han, KM, Won, E, et al. Association of brain-derived neurotrophic factor DNA methylation and reduced white matter integrity in the anterior corona radiata in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2015; 172: 74–80.Google Scholar

References

Linden, DE. Neurofeedback and networks of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014; 16(1): 103–112.Google Scholar

Esmail, S, Linden, DE. Emotion regulation networks and neurofeedback in depression. Cognitive Sciences. 2011; 6(2): 101.Google Scholar

Linden, DE. Brain Control: Developments in Therapy and Implications for Society. Springer; 2014.Google Scholar

Emmert, K, Kopel, R, Sulzer, J, et al. Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: How is brain regulation mediated? Neuroimage. 2016; 124: 806–812.CrossRef Google Scholar

Engen, HG, Kanske, P, Singer, T. The neural component-process architecture of endogenously generated emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2016; 12(2): 197–211.Google Scholar

Dörfel, D, Lamke, J-P, Hummel, F, et al. Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by detachment, reinterpretation, distraction, and expressive suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation. Neuroimage. 2014; 101: 298–309.Google Scholar

Cohen, JR, Berkman, ET, Lieberman, MD. Intentional and incidental self-control in ventrolateral PFC. In: Donald, T. Stuss and Robert, T. Knight. editors. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press; 2013, pp. 417–40.Google Scholar

Anderson, JS, Ferguson, MA, Lopez-Larson, M, Yurgelun-Todd, D. Connectivity gradients between the default mode and attention control networks. Brain Connectivity. 2011; 1(2): 147–157.Google Scholar

Singh, KD, Fawcett, I. Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task. Neuroimage. 2008; 41(1): 100–112.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sridharan, D, Levitin, DJ, Menon, V. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008; 105(34): 12569–12574.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Scharnowski, F, Veit, R, Zopf, R, et al. Manipulating motor performance and memory through real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Biological Psychology. 2015; 108: 85–97.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Skottnik, L, Sorger, B, Kamp, T, Linden, D, Goebel, R. Success and failure of controlling the real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback signal are reflected in the striatum. Brain and Behavior. 2019 March; 9(3): e01240.Google Scholar

Sitaram, R, Ros, T, Stoeckel, L, et al. Closed-loop brain training: The science of neurofeedback. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2017; 18(2): 86.Google Scholar

Mehler, DM, Sokunbi, MO, Habes, I, et al. Targeting the affective brain—a randomized controlled trial of real-time fMRI neurofeedback in patients with depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(13): 2578.Google Scholar

Young, KD, Siegle, GJ, Zotev, V, et al. Randomized clinical trial of real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback for major depressive disorder: Effects on symptoms and autobiographical memory recall. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2017 August 1; 174(8): 748–755.Google Scholar

Herwig, U, Kaffenberger, T, Jäncke, L, Brühl, AB. Self-related awareness and emotion regulation. NeuroImage. 2010; 50(2): 734–741.Google Scholar

Beer, JS, Heerey, EA, Keltner, D, Scabini, D, Knight, RT. The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: Insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85(4): 594.Google Scholar

Schooler, JW, Smallwood, J, Christoff, K, et al. Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2011; 15(7): 319–326.Google Scholar

Ernst, J, Böker, H, Hättenschwiler, J, et al. The association of interoceptive awareness and alexithymia with neurotransmitter concentrations in insula and anterior cingulate. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2013; 9(6): 857–863.Google Scholar

Deng, Y, Ma, X, Tang, Q. Brain response during visual emotional processing: An fMRI study of alexithymia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2013; 213(3): 225–229.Google Scholar

Goerlich-Dobre, KS, Bruce, L, Martens, S, Aleman, A, Hooker, CI. Distinct associations of insula and cingulate volume with the cognitive and affective dimensions of alexithymia. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 53: 284–292.Google Scholar

Hogeveen, J, Bird, G, Chau, A, Krueger, F, Grafman, J. Acquired alexithymia following damage to the anterior insula. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 82: 142–148.Google Scholar

Zotev, V, Krueger, F, Phillips, R, et al. Self-regulation of amygdala activation using real-time fMRI neurofeedback. PloS One. 2011; 6(9): e24522.Google Scholar

MacDuffie, KE, MacInnes, J, Dickerson, KC, et al. Single session real-time fMRI neurofeedback has a lasting impact on cognitive behavioral therapy strategies. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2018; 19: 868–875.Google Scholar

Muris, P. Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002; 32(2): 337–348.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kavanagh, DJ, Wilson, PH. Prediction of outcome with group cognitive therapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1989; 27(4): 333–343.Google Scholar

Maddux, JE, Meier, LJ. Self-Efficacy and Depression. Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment. Springer; 1995. 143–169.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartra, O, McGuire, JT, Kable, JW. The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage. 2013; 76: 412–427.Google Scholar

Balleine, BW, Delgado, MR, Hikosaka, O. The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007; 27(31): 8161–8165.Google Scholar

Young, KD, Siegle, GJ, Misaki, M, et al. Altered task-based and resting-state amygdala functional connectivity following real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback training in major depressive disorder. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2018; 17: 691–703.Google Scholar

Sheline, YI, Barch, DM, Price, JL, et al. The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(6): 1942–1947.Google Scholar

Zhu, X, Wang, X, Xiao, J, et al. Evidence of a dissociation pattern in resting-state default mode network connectivity in first-episode, treatment-naive major depression patients. Biological Psychiatry. 2012; 71(7): 611–617.Google Scholar

Hamilton, JP, Furman, DJ, Chang, C, et al. Default-mode and task-positive network activity in major depressive disorder: Implications for adaptive and maladaptive rumination. Biological Psychiatry. 2011; 70(4): 327–333.Google Scholar

Marchetti, I, Koster, EH, Sonuga-Barke, EJ, De Raedt, R. The default mode network and recurrent depression: A neurobiological model of cognitive risk factors. Neuropsychology Review. 2012; 22(3): 229–251.Google Scholar

Belleau, EL, Taubitz, LE, Larson, CL. Imbalance of default mode and regulatory networks during externally focused processing in depression. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2014; 10(5): 744–751.Google Scholar

Burkhouse, KL, Jacobs, RH, Peters, AT, et al. Neural correlates of rumination in adolescents with remitted major depressive disorder and healthy controls. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2017; 17(2): 394–405.Google Scholar

Mandell, D, Siegle, GJ, Shutt, L, Feldmiller, J, Thase, ME. Neural substrates of trait ruminations in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2014; 123(1): 35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Siegle, GJ, Steinhauer, SR, Thase, ME, Stenger, VA, Carter, CS. Can’t shake that feeling: event-related fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individuals. Biological Psychiatry. 2002; 51(9): 693–707.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Siegle, GJ, Carter, CS, Thase, ME. Use of fMRI to predict recovery from unipolar depression with cognitive behavior therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 163(4): 735–738.Google Scholar

Linden, DE, Habes, I, Johnston, SJ, et al. Real-time self-regulation of emotion networks in patients with depression. PloS One. 2012; 7(6): e38115.Google Scholar

Yuan, H, Young, KD, Phillips, R, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity modulation and sustained changes after real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback training in depression. Brain Connectivity. 2014; 4(9): 690–701.Google Scholar

Hamilton, JP, Glover, GH, Bagarinao, E, et al. Effects of salience-network-node neurofeedback training on affective biases in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2016; 249: 91–96.Google Scholar

Teasdale, JD, Green, HA. Ruminative self-focus and autobiographical memory. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004; 36(8): 1933–1943.Google Scholar

Sutherland, K, Bryant, RA. Rumination and overgeneral autobiographical memory. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2007; 45(10): 2407–2416.Google Scholar

Ramot, M, Grossman, S, Friedman, D, Malach, R. Covert neurofeedback without awareness shapes cortical network spontaneous connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(17): E2413–E20.Google Scholar

Thibault, RT, MacPherson, A, Lifshitz, M, Roth, RR, Raz, A. Neurofeedback with fMRI: A critical systematic review. Neuroimage. 2018; 172: 786–807.Google Scholar

Hamann, S, Canli, T. Individual differences in emotion processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004; 14(2): 233–238.Google Scholar

Berlim, MT, Van den Eynde, F, Daskalakis, ZJ. Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38(4): 543.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berlim, M, Van den Eynde, F, Tovar-Perdomo, S, Daskalakis, Z. Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Psychological Medicine. 2014; 44(2): 225–239.Google Scholar

Young, KD, Zotev, V, Phillips, R, Misaki, M, Yuan, H, Drevets, WC, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of amygdala activity in patients with major depressive disorder. PloS One. 2014; 9(2):e88785.Google Scholar

Yang, Y, Zhong, N, Imamura, K, et al. Task and resting-state fMRI reveal altered salience responses to positive stimuli in patients with major depressive disorder. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(5): e0155092.Google Scholar

Sheline, YI, Barch, DM, Donnelly, JM, et al. Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: An fMRI study. Biological Psychiatry. 2001; 50(9): 651–658.Google Scholar

Drevets, WC, Price, JL, Bardgett, ME, et al. Glucose metabolism in the amygdala in depression: Relationship to diagnostic subtype and plasma cortisol levels. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2002; 71(3): 431–447.Google Scholar

Drevets, WC. Neuroimaging abnormalities in the amygdala in mood disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003; 985(1): 420–444.Google Scholar

Victor, TA, Furey, ML, Fromm, SJ, Öhman, A, Drevets, WC. Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treatment in major depressive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2010; 67(11): 1128–1138.Google Scholar

Suslow, T, Konrad, C, Kugel, H, et al. Automatic mood-congruent amygdala responses to masked facial expressions in major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2010; 67(2): 155–160.Google Scholar

Seeley, WW, Menon, V, Schatzberg, AF, Keller, J, Glover, GH, Kenna, H, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007; 27(9): 2349–56.Google Scholar

Jacobs, R, Barba, A, Gowins, J, et al. Decoupling of the amygdala to other salience network regions in adolescent-onset recurrent major depressive disorder. Psychological Medicine. 2016; 46(5): 1055–1067.Google Scholar

Packard, MG, Cahill, L. Affective modulation of multiple memory systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001; 11(6): 752–756.Google Scholar

Burianova, H, McIntosh, AR, Grady, CL. A common functional brain network for autobiographical, episodic, and semantic memory retrieval. Neuroimage. 2010; 49(1): 865–874.Google Scholar

Noulhiane, M, Piolino, P, Hasboun, D, et al. Autobiographical memory after temporal lobe resection: neuropsychological and MRI volumetric findings. Brain. 2007; 130(12): 3184–3199.Google Scholar

Aggleton, JP, Brown, MW. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1999; 22(3): 425–444.Google Scholar

Young, KD. Effects of amygdala neurofeedback on depressive symptoms. Identification No. NCT02709161. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02709161. 2016.Google Scholar

Young, KD. Neurofeedback for treatment resistant depression. Identification No. NCT03428828. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03428828. 2018.Google Scholar

Engen, HG, Bernhardt, BC, Skottnik, L, Ricard, M, Singer, T. Structural changes in socio-affective networks: Multi-modal MRI findings in long-term meditation practitioners. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 116: 26–33.Google Scholar

Young, KD, Misaki, M, Harmer, CJ, et al. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging amygdala neurofeedback changes positive information processing in major depressive disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2017; 82(8): 578–586.Google Scholar

Mathiak, K. Symptom based treatment affects brain plasticity – cognitive training in patients with affective symptoms (APIC-II). Identification No. NCT03183947. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03183947. 2017.Google Scholar

Hamilton, JP, Etkin, A, Furman, DJ, et al. Functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis and new integration of baseline activation and neural response data. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2012; 169(7): 693–703.Google Scholar

Caria, A, Sitaram, R, Veit, R, Begliomini, C, Birbaumer, N. Volitional control of anterior insula activity modulates the response to aversive stimuli. A real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry. 2010; 68(5): 425–432.Google Scholar

Herwig, U, Lutz, J, Scherpiet, S, et al. Training emotion regulation through real-time fMRI neurofeedback of amygdala activity. NeuroImage. 2019; 184: 687–696.Google Scholar

Perlman, G, Simmons, AN, Wu, J, et al. Amygdala response and functional connectivity during emotion regulation: a study of 14 depressed adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2012; 139(1): 75–84.Google Scholar

Carballedo, A, Scheuerecker, J, Meisenzahl, E, et al. Functional connectivity of emotional processing in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011; 134(1–3): 272–279.Google Scholar

de Almeida, JRC, Versace, A, Mechelli, A, et al. Abnormal amygdala-prefrontal effective connectivity to happy faces differentiates bipolar from major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2009; 66(5): 451–459.Google Scholar

Zahn, R, Weingartner, J, Basilio, R, et al. 30 Blame Rebalance fMRI Feedback Proof-of-Concept Trial in Major Depressive Disorder. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2017.Google Scholar

Greicius, MD, Flores, BH, Menon, V, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: Abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biological Psychiatry. 2007; 62(5): 429–437.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sheline, YI, Price, JL, Yan, Z, Mintun, MA. Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(24): 11020–11025.Google Scholar

Veer, IM, Beckmann, C, Van Tol, M-J, et al. Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2010; 4: 41.Google Scholar

Drysdale, AT, Grosenick, L, Downar, J, et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nature Medicine. 2017; 23(1): 28.Google Scholar

Dinga, R, Schmaal, L, Penninx, B, et al. Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: Methodological replication and extension of. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2019; 22: 101796.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yamada, T, Hashimoto, R-i, Yahata, N, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity-based biomarkers and functional MRI-based neurofeedback for psychiatric disorders: a challenge for developing theranostic biomarkers. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017; 20(10): 769–781.Google Scholar

Moll, J, Weingartner, JH, Bado, P, et al. Voluntary enhancement of neural signatures of affiliative emotion using fMRI neurofeedback. PloS One. 2014; 9(5): e97343.Google Scholar

Sokhadze, EM, El-Baz, AS, Tasman, A, et al. Neuromodulation integrating rTMS and neurofeedback for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2014; 39(3–4): 237–257.Google Scholar

Koganemaru, S, Mikami, Y, Maezawa, H, et al. Neurofeedback control of the human GABAergic system using non-invasive brain stimulation. Neuroscience. 2018; 380: 38–48.Google Scholar

Siepmann, M, Aykac, V, Unterdörfer, J, Petrowski, K, Mueck-Weymann, M. A pilot study on the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with depression and in healthy subjects. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2008; 33(4): 195–201.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Karavidas, MK, Lehrer, PM, Vaschillo, E, et al. Preliminary results of an open label study of heart rate variability biofeedback for the treatment of major depression. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2007; 32(1): 19–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gevirtz, R. The promise of heart rate variability biofeedback: Evidence-based applications. Biofeedback. 2013; 41(3): 110–120.Google Scholar

Tang, Y, Posner, MI, Rothbart, MK. Meditation improves self‐regulation over the life span. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2014; 1307(1): 104–111.Google Scholar

Tang, Y, Ma, Y, Wang, J, et al. Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104(43): 17152–17156.Google Scholar

Baird, B, Mrazek, MD, Phillips, DT, Schooler, JW. Domain-specific enhancement of metacognitive ability following meditation training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014; 143(5): 1972.Google Scholar

Hofmann, SG, Sawyer, AT, Witt, AA, Oh, D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2010; 78(2): 169.Google Scholar

Peciña, M. Study of neural responses induced by antidepressant effects (SONRISA). Identification No. NCT02674529. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02674529. 2016.Google Scholar

Scharnowski, F. Neural correlates of neurofeedback training. Identification No. NCT03165578. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03165578. 2017.Google Scholar

Sorger, B, Scharnowski, F, Linden, DE, Hampson, M, Young, KD. Control freaks: Towards optimal selection of control conditions for fMRI neurofeedback studies. NeuroImage. 2019; 186: 256–265.Google Scholar

Randell, E, McNamara, R, Subramanian, L, Hood, K, Linden, D. Current Practices in Clinical Neurofeedback with Functional MRI-Analysis of a Survey Using the TIDieR Checklist. Eur Psychiatry; 2018.Google Scholar

Grossberg, , S, On the dynamics of operant conditioning. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1971 November; 33(2): 225–255.Google Scholar

Staddon, JER, Cerutti, DT. Operant Conditioning. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003; 54: 115–144.Google Scholar

References

Jobsis, FF. Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters. Science. 1977; 198(4323): 1264–1267.Google Scholar

Villringer, A, Planck, J, Hock, C, Schleinkofer, L, Dirnagl, U. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): A new tool to study hemodynamic changes during activation of brain function in human adults. Neurosci Lett. 1993; 154(1–2): 101–104.Google Scholar

Gratton, G, Maier, JS, Fabiani, M, Mantulin, WW, Gratton, E. Feasibility of intracranial near-infrared optical scanning. Psychophysiology. 1994; 31(2): 211–215.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maki, A, Yamashita, Y, Ito, Y, et al. Spatial and temporal analysis of human motor activity using noninvasive NIR topography. Med Phys. 1995; 22(12): 1997–2005.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Villringer, A, Chance, B. Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function. Trends Neurosci. 1997; 20(10): 435–442.Google Scholar

Obrig, H. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy: Does it function in functional activation studies of the adult brain? Int J Psychophysiol. 2000; 35(2–3): 125–142.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yamashita, Y, Maki, A, Koizumi, H. Wavelength dependence of the precision of noninvasive optical measurement of oxy-, deoxy-, and total-hemoglobin concentration. Med Phys. 2001; 28(6): 1108–1114.Google Scholar

Ferrari, M, Quaresima, V. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(2): 921–935.Google Scholar

Strangman, G, Boas, DA, Sutton, JP. Non-invasive neuroimaging using near-infrared light. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 52(7): 679–693.Google Scholar

Elwell, CE. et al. Measurement of adult cerebral haemodynamics using near infrared spectroscopy. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993; 59: 74–80.Google Scholar PubMed

Takahashi, T, Takikawa, Y, Kawagoe, R, et al. Influence of skin blood flow on near-infrared spectroscopy signals measured on the forehead during a verbal fluency task. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(3): 991–1002.Google Scholar

Kohri, S, Hoshi, Y, Tamura, M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the relative contribution ratio of cerebral tissue to near-infrared signals in the adult human head: A preliminary study. Physiol Meas. 2002; 23(2): 301–312.Google Scholar

Fox, PT, Raichle, ME. Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83(4): 1140–1144.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hock, C. et al. Decrease in parietal cerebral hemoglobin oxygenation during performance of a verbal fluency task in patients with Alzheimer’s disease monitored by means of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)–correlation with simultaneous rCBF-PET measurements. Brain Res. 1997; 755(2): 293–303.Google Scholar

Sato, H. et al. A NIRS-fMRI investigation of prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task. Neuroimage. 2013; 83: 158–173.Google Scholar

Cui, X, Bray, S, Bryant, DM, Glover, GH, Reiss, AL. A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(4): 2808–2821.Google Scholar

Strangman, G, Culver, JP, Thompson, JH, Boas, DA. A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2): 719–731.Google Scholar

Moriguchi, Y. et al. Validation of brain-derived signals in near-infrared spectroscopy through multivoxel analysis of concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(10): 5274–5291.Google Scholar

Tsuzuki, D, Jurcak, V, Singh, AK, et al. Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space. Neuroimage. 2007; 34(4): 1506–1518.Google Scholar

Okada, F, Takahashi, N, Tokumitsu, Y. Dominance of the ‘nondominant’ hemisphere in depression. J Affect Disord. 1996; 37(1): 13–21.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cyranoski, D. Neuroscience: Thought experiment. Nature. 2011; 469(7329): 148–149.Google Scholar

Zhang, H. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy for examination of prefrontal activation during cognitive tasks in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015; 69(1): 22–33.Google Scholar

Matsuo, K, Kato, T, Fukuda, M, Kato, N. Alteration of hemoglobin oxygenation in the frontal region in elderly depressed patients as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000; 12(4): 465–471.Google Scholar

Suto, T, Fukuda, M, Ito, M, Uehara, T, Mikuni, M. Multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy in depression and schizophrenia: cognitive brain activation study. Biol Psychiatry. 2004; 55(5): 501–511.Google Scholar

Hirano, J. et al. Frontal and temporal cortical functional recovery after electroconvulsive therapy for depression: A longitudinal functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Psychiatr Res. 2017; 91: 26–35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koseki, S. et al. The relationship between positive and negative automatic thought and activity in the prefrontal and temporal cortices: A multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study. J Affect Disord. 2013; 151(1): 352–359.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Noda, T. et al. Frontal and right temporal activations correlate negatively with depression severity during verbal fluency task: A multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Psychiatr Res. 2012; 46(7): 905–912.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pu, S. et al. The relationship between the prefrontal activation during a verbal fluency task and stress-coping style in major depressive disorder: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Psychiatr Res. 2012; 46(11): 1427–1434.Google Scholar

Pu, S. et al. Reduced frontopolar activation during verbal fluency task associated with poor social functioning in late-onset major depression: Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008; 62(6): 728–737.Google Scholar

Tsujii, N. et al. Relationship between prefrontal hemodynamic responses and quality of life differs between melancholia and non-melancholic depression. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 253(30): 26–35.Google Scholar

Usami, M, Iwadare, Y, Kodaira, M, Watanabe, K, Saito, K. Near infrared spectroscopy study of the frontopolar hemodynamic response and depressive mood in children with major depressive disorder: A pilot study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1): e86290.Google Scholar

Akashi, H, Tsujii, N, Mikawa, W, et al. Prefrontal cortex activation is associated with a discrepancy between self- and observer-rated depression severities of major depressive disorder: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Affect Disord. 2015; 174(15): 165–172.Google Scholar

Tsujii, N. et al. Right temporal activation differs between melancholia and nonmelancholic depression: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Psychiatr Res. 2014; 55: 1–7.Google Scholar

Pu, S. et al. Suicidal ideation is associated with reduced prefrontal activation during a verbal fluency task in patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2015; 18: 9–17.Google Scholar

Tomioka, H. et al. A longitudinal functional neuroimaging study in medication-naive depression after antidepressant treatment. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3): e0120828.Google Scholar

Masuda, K. et al. Different functioning of prefrontal cortex predicts treatment response after a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment in patients with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2017; 214: 44–52.Google Scholar

Nishida, M, Kikuchi, S, Matsumoto, K, et al. Sleep complaints are associated with reduced left prefrontal activation during a verbal fluency task in patients with major depression: A multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Affect Disord. 2017; 207: 102–109.Google Scholar

Takamiya, A. et al. High-dose antidepressants affect near-infrared spectroscopy signals: A retrospective study. Neuroimage Clin. 2017; 14: 648–655.Google Scholar

Tsujii, N. et al. Reduced left precentral regional responses in patients with major depressive disorder and history of suicide attempts. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4): e0175249.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schlosser, R. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity in a verbal fluency task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998; 64(4): 492–498.Google Scholar

Cuenod, CA, Bookheimer, SY, Hertz-Pannier, L, et al. Functional MRI during word generation, using conventional equipment: A potential tool for language localization in the clinical environment,. Neurology. 1995; 45(10): 1821–1827.Google Scholar

Strauss, E, Sherman, EMS, Spreen, O, Spreen, O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests : Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ma, XY. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy reveals abnormal hemodynamics in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of menopausal depression patients. Dis Markers. 2017; (2017): 1695930. DOI: 10.1155/2017/1695930Google Scholar

Liu, X. et al. Relationship between the prefrontal function and the severity of the emotional symptoms during a verbal fluency task in patients with major depressive disorder: A multi-channel NIRS study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 54: 114–121.Google Scholar

Pu, S. et al. Reduced prefrontal cortex activation during the working memory task associated with poor social functioning in late-onset depression: Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy study. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 203(2–3): 222–228.Google Scholar

Eschweiler, GW. et al. Left prefrontal activation predicts therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2000; 99(3): 161–172.Google Scholar

Pu, S. et al. A multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy study of prefrontal cortex activation during working memory task in major depressive disorder. Neurosci Res. 2011; 70(1): 91–97.Google Scholar

Onishi, Y, Kikuchi, S, Watanabe, E, Kato, S. Alterations in prefrontal cortical activity in the course of treatment for late-life depression as assessed on near-infrared spectroscopy. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008; 62(2): 177–184.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, S. et al. Prefrontal cerebral activity during a simple “rock, paper, scissors” task measured by the noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy method. Psychiatry Res. 2007; 156(3): 199–208.Google Scholar

Matsuo, K, Kato, N, Kato, T. Decreased cerebral haemodynamic response to cognitive and physiological tasks in mood disorders as shown by near-infrared spectroscopy. Psychol Med. 2002; 32(6): 1029–1037.Google Scholar

Matsuo, K, Onodera, Y, Hamamoto, T, et al. Hypofrontality and microvascular dysregulation in remitted late-onset depression assessed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(1): 234–242.Google Scholar

Ono, Y. et al. Prefrontal oxygenation during verbal fluency and cognitive function in adolescents with bipolar disorder type II. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017; 25: 147–153.Google Scholar

Mikawa, W, Tsujii, N, Akashi, H, et al. Left temporal activation associated with depression severity during a verbal fluency task in patients with bipolar disorder: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Affect Disord. 2015; 173: 193–200.Google Scholar

Nishimura, Y. et al. Social function and frontopolar activation during a cognitive task in patients with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychobiology. 2015; 72(2): 81–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nishimura, Y, Takahashi, K, Ohtani, T, et al. Dorsolateral prefrontal hemodynamic responses during a verbal fluency task in hypomanic bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2015; 17(2): 172–183.Google Scholar

Ono, Y. et al. Reduced prefrontal activation during performance of the Iowa gambling task in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 233(1): 1–8.Google Scholar

Matsuo, K. et al. A near-infrared spectroscopy study of prefrontal cortex activation during a verbal fluency task and carbon dioxide inhalation in individuals with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2007; 9(8): 876–883.Google Scholar

Matsuo, K, Watanabe, A, Onodera, Y, Kato, N, Kato, T. Prefrontal hemodynamic response to verbal-fluency task and hyperventilation in bipolar disorder measured by multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy. J Affect Disord. 2004; 82(1): 85–92.Google Scholar

Kubota, Y. et al. Altered prefrontal lobe oxygenation in bipolar disorder: A study by near-infrared spectroscopy. Psychol Med. 2009; 39(8): 1265–1275.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ohi, K. et al. Impact of familial loading on prefrontal activation in major psychiatric disorders: A near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44268.Google Scholar

Ohta, H. et al. Hypofrontality in panic disorder and major depressive disorder assessed by multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy. Depress Anxiety. 2008; 25(12): 1053–1059.Google Scholar

Kameyama, M. et al. Frontal lobe function in bipolar disorder: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroimage. 2006; 29(1): 172–184.Google Scholar

Takizawa, R. et al. Neuroimaging-aided differential diagnosis of the depressive state. Neuroimage. 2014; 85(Pt 1): 498–507.Google Scholar

Kinou, M. et al. Differential spatiotemporal characteristics of the prefrontal hemodynamic response and their association with functional impairment in schizophrenia and major depression. Schizophr Res. 2013; 150(2–3): 459–467.Google Scholar

Ohtani, T, Nishimura, Y, Takahashi, K, et al. Association between longitudinal changes in prefrontal hemodynamic responses and social adaptation in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2015; 176: 78–86.Google Scholar

Zhu, Y. et al. Prefrontal activation during a working memory task differs between patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: A preliminary exploratory study. J Affect Disord. 2018 January 1; 225: 64–70.Google Scholar

Matsubara, T. et al. Prefrontal activation in response to emotional words in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Neuroimage. 2014; 85(Pt 1): 489–497.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Uceyler, N, Zeller, J, Kewenig, S, et al. Increased cortical activation upon painful stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2015; 15: 210.Google Scholar

Takei, Y. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopic study of frontopolar activation during face-to-face conversation in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2014; 57: 74–83.Google Scholar

References

Woodman, GF. A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Atten Percept Psychophys [Internet]. 2010 November; 72(8): 2031–2046. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21097848 CrossRef Google Scholar

Vandoolaeghe, E, van Hunsel, F, Nuyten, D, Maes, M. Auditory event related potentials in major depression: prolonged P300 latency and increased P200 amplitude. J Affect Disord. 1998 March; 48(2–3): 105–113.Google Scholar

Pfefferbaum, A, Wenegrat, BG, Ford, JM, Roth, WT, Kopell, BS. Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 April; 59(2): 104–124.Google Scholar

Diner, BC, Holcomb, PJ, Dykman, RA. P300 in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 1985 July; 15(3): 175–184.Google Scholar

Bange, F, Bathien, N. Visual cognitive dysfunction in depression: An event-related potential study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 September; 108(5): 472–481.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schlegel, S, Nieber, D, Herrmann, C, Bakauski, E. Latencies of the P300 component of the auditory event-related potential in depression are related to the Bech-Rafaelsen melancholia scale but not to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 June; 83(6): 438–440.Google Scholar

Pierson, A, Ragot, R, Van Hooff, J, et al. Heterogeneity of information-processing alterations according to dimensions of depression: an event-related potentials study. Biol Psychiatry. 1996; 40(2): 98–115.Google Scholar

Bruder, GE, Kroppmann, CJ, Kayser, J, et al. Reduced brain responses to novel sounds in depression: P3 findings in a novelty oddball task. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 170(2–3): 218–223.Google Scholar

Friedman, D, Simpson, G, Hamberger, M. Age‐related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30(4): 383–396.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tenke, CE, Kayser, J, Stewart, JW, Bruder, GE. Novelty P3 reductions in depression: characterization using principal components analysis (PCA) of current source density (CSD) waveforms. Psychophysiology. 2010; 47(1): 133–146.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fu, L, Xiang, D, Subodh, D, et al. Auditory P300 study in patients with convalescent bipolar depression and bipolar depression. Neuroreport. 2018 August; 29(11): 968–973.Google Scholar

Bersani, FS, Minichino, A, Fattapposta, F, et al. P300 component in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder type I, bipolar disorder type II and healthy controls: A preliminary event-related potential study. Neuroreport. 2015 March; 26(4): 206–210.Google Scholar

Bruder, GE, Kayser, J, Tenke, CCE. Event-related brain potentials in depression: clinical, cognitive and neurophysiologic implications. Oxford Handb event-related potential components [Internet]. 2012; 2012: 563–592. Available from: http://psychophysiology.cpmc.columbia.edu/pdf/bruder2009a.pdf Google Scholar

Karaaslan, F, Gonul, AS, Oguz, A, Erdinc, E, Esel, E. P300 changes in major depressive disorders with and without psychotic features. J Affect Disord. 2003; 73(3): 283–287.Google Scholar

Li, Y, Hu, Y, Liu, T, Wu, D. Dipole source analysis of auditory P300 response in depressive and anxiety disorders. Cogn Neurodyn. 2011; 5(2): 221–229.Google Scholar

Li, Y, Wang, W, Liu, T, et al. Source analysis of P3a and P3b components to investigate interaction of depression and anxiety in attentional systems. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 17138.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hetzel, G, Moeller, O, Evers, S, et al. The astroglial protein S100B and visually evoked event-related potentials before and after antidepressant treatment. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 178(2–3): 161–166.Google Scholar

Hansenne, M, Ansseau, M. P300 event-related potential and serotonin-1A activity in depression. Eur psychiatry. 1999; 14(3): 143–147.Google Scholar

Jaworska, N, Protzner, A. Electrocortical features of depression and their clinical utility in assessing antidepressant treatment outcome. Can J Psychiatry. 2013; 58(9): 509–514.Google Scholar

Arns, M, Drinkenburg, WH, Fitzgerald, PB, Kenemans, JL. Neurophysiological predictors of non-response to rTMS in depression. Brain Stimul [Internet]. 2012; 5(4): 569–576. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.003 Google Scholar

Tripathi, SM, Mishra, N, Tripathi, RK, Gurnani, KC. P300 latency as an indicator of severity in major depressive disorder. Ind Psychiatry J. 2015; 24(2): 163–167.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Scheffers, MK, Coles, MGH. Performance monitoring in a confusing world: Error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. Vol. 26, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. US: American Psychological Association; 2000. 141–151.Google Scholar

Olvet, DM, Hajcak, G. The error-related negativity (ERN) and psychopathology: Toward an Endophenotype. Clin Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2008 December 9; 28(8): 1343–1354. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615243/Google Scholar

Schoenberg, PLA. The error processing system in major depressive disorder: Cortical phenotypal marker hypothesis. Biol Psychol. 2014 May; 99: 100–114.Google Scholar

Ruchsow, M, Herrnberger, B, Wiesend, C, et al. The effect of erroneous responses on response monitoring in patients with major depressive disorder: A study with event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 2004 November; 41(6): 833–840.Google Scholar

Schrijvers, D, Hulstijn, W, Sabbe, BGC. Psychomotor symptoms in depression: A diagnostic, pathophysiological and therapeutic tool. J Affect Disord. 2008 July; 109(1–2): 1–20.Google Scholar

Schrijvers, D, de Bruijn, ERA, Maas, Y, et al. Action monitoring in major depressive disorder with psychomotor retardation. Cortex. 2008 May; 44(5): 569–579.Google Scholar

Schrijvers, D, De Bruijn, ERA, Maas, YJ, et al. Action monitoring and depressive symptom reduction in major depressive disorder. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 March; 71(3): 218–224.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weinberg, A, Liu, H, Shankman, SA. Blunted neural response to errors as a trait marker of melancholic depression. Biol Psychol. 2016 January; 113: 100–107.Google Scholar

Chiu, PH, Deldin, PJ. Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(4): 608–616.Google Scholar

Gorka, SM, Lieberman, L, Shankman, SA, Phan, KL. Startle potentiation to uncertain threat as a psychophysiological indicator of fear-based psychopathology: An examination across multiple internalizing disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017; 126(1): 8.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, GS. The vascular depression hypothesis: 10 years later. Vol. 60, Biological Psychiatry . United States; 2006. pp. 1304–1305.Google Scholar

Fissler, M, Winnebeck, E, Schroeter, TA, et al. Brief training in mindfulness may normalize a blunted error-related negativity in chronically depressed patients. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 December; 17(6): 1164–1175.Google Scholar

Hegerl, U, Juckel, G. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: A new hypothesis* 1. Biological Psychiatry. 1993; 33: 173–187.Google Scholar

Juckel, G, Molnar, M, Hegerl, U, Csepe, V, Karmos, G. Auditory-evoked potentials as indicator of brain serotonergic activity–first evidence in behaving cats. Biol Psychiatry. 1997 June; 41(12): 1181–1195.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Juckel, G, Hegerl, U, Molnar, M, Csepe, V, Karmos, G. Auditory evoked potentials reflect serotonergic neuronal activity–a study in behaving cats administered drugs acting on 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999 December; 21(6): 710–716.Google Scholar

Jacobs, BL, Wilkinson, LO, Fornal, CA. The role of brain serotonin: A neurophysiologic perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1990; 3(5–6): 473–479.Google Scholar

Aghajanian, GK, Vandermaelen, CP. Specific Systems of the Reticular Core: Serotonin [Internet]. Comprehensive Physiology. 2011. (Major Reference Works). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp010404 Google Scholar

Lewis, DA, Campbell, MJ, Foote, SL, Morrison, JH. The monoaminergic innervation of primate neocortex. Hum Neurobiol [Internet]. 1986; 5(3): 181–188. Available from: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/3533864 Google Scholar

Wutzler, A, Winter, C, Kitzrow, W, et al. Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials as indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: Simultaneous electrophysiological recordings and in vivo microdialysis in the rat primary auditory cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2008 May 7; 33: 3176. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2008.42 Google Scholar

Ruohonen, EM, Astikainen, P. Brain responses to sound intensity changes dissociate depressed participants and healthy controls. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2017; 127: 74–81. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051117301060 Google Scholar

Gopal, K V, Bishop, CE, Carney, L. Auditory measures in clinically depressed individuals. II. Auditory evoked potentials and behavioral speech tests. Int J Audiol. 2004 October; 43(9): 499–505.Google Scholar

Linka, T, Sartory, G, Bender, S, Gastpar, M, Müller, BW. The intensity dependence of auditory ERP components in unmedicated patients with major depression and healthy controls. An analysis of group differences. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2007; 103(1): 139–145. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032707000201 Google Scholar

Park, Y-M, Lee, S-H, Kim, S, Bae, S-M. The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 34(2): 313–316.Google Scholar

Chen, T-J, Yu, YW-Y, Chen, M-C, et al. Serotonin dysfunction and suicide attempts in major depressives: An auditory event-related potential study. Neuropsychobiology. 2005; 52(1): 28–36.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, PB, Mellow, TB, Hoy, KE, et al. A study of intensity dependence of the auditory evoked potential (IDAEP) in medicated melancholic and non-melancholic depression. J Affect Disord. 2009; 117(3): 212–216.Google Scholar

Jaworska, N, Blier, P, Fusee, W, Knott, V. Scalp- and sLORETA-derived loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEPs) in unmedicated depressed males and females and healthy controls. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2012 September; 123(9): 1769–1778. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.02.076 Google Scholar

Lee, B-H, Park, Y-M, Lee, S-H, Shim, M. Prediction of long-term treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) using scalp and source loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) Analysis in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2015; 16(3): 6251–6265. Available from: www.mdpi.com/1422–0067/16/3/6251 Google Scholar

Mulert, C, Juckel, G, Augustin, H, Hegerl, U. Comparison between the analysis of the loudness dependency of the auditory N1/P2 component with LORETA and dipole source analysis in the prediction of treatment response to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in major depression. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2002; 113(10): 1566–1572. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245702002523 Google Scholar

Jaworska, N, Blondeau, C, Tessier, P, et al. Response prediction to antidepressants using scalp and source-localized loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) slopes. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2013; 44: 100–107. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584613000146 Google Scholar

Gallinat, J, Bottlender, R, Juckel, G, et al. The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl) [Internet]. 2000 March; 148(4): 404–411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050070 Google Scholar

Gur, E, Lerer, B, Dremencov, E, Newman, ME. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces subsensitivity of presynaptic serotonergic autoreceptor activity in rat brain. Neuroreport [Internet]. 2000; 11(13). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Fulltext/2000/09110/Chronic_repetitive_transcranial_magnetic.19.aspx Google Scholar

Gur, E, Lerer, B, Van de Kar, LD, Newman, ME. Chronic rTMS induces subsensitivity of post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors in rat hypothalamus. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol [Internet]. 2004 September 1; 7(3): 335–340. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1461145703003985 Google Scholar

Sibon, I, Strafella, AP, Gravel, P, et al. Acute prefrontal cortex TMS in healthy volunteers: Effects on brain 11 C-αMtrp trapping. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2007; 34(4): 1658–1664. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811906008846 Google Scholar

Lee, S, Jang, K-I, Chae, J-H. Association of the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials with clinical changes to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression. J Affect Disord. 2018 October; 238: 451–457.Google Scholar

Fox, MD, Buckner, RL, White, MP, Greicius, MD, Pascual-Leone, A. Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 October; 72(7): 595–603.Google Scholar

Korb, AS, Cook, IA, Hunter, AM, Leuchter, AF. Brain electrical source differences between depressed subjects and healthy controls. Brain Topogr. 2008; 21(2): 138–146.Google Scholar

Pollock, VE, Schneider, LS. Topographic quantitative EEG in elderly subjects with major depression. Psychophysiology [Internet]. 1990 July 1; 27(4): 438–444. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469–8986.1990.tb02340.x Google Scholar

Lopes da Silva, F., Vos, J., Mooibroek, J, Rotterdam, A van. Relative contributions of intracortical and thalamo-cortical processes in the generation of alpha rhythms, revealed by partial coherence analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980; 50(5–6): 449–456.Google Scholar

Suffczynski, P. Computational model of thalamo-cortical networks: dynamical control of alpha rhythms in relation to focal attention. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001; 43(1): 25–40.Google Scholar

Chaumon, M, Busch, NA. Prestimulus neural oscillations inhibit visual perception via modulation of response gain. J Cogn Neurosci [Internet]. 2014 April 17; 26(11): 2514–2529. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00653 Google Scholar

Laufs, H, Krakow, K, Sterzer, P, et al. Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. 2003;(October) PNAS September 16, 2003 100 (19) 11053–11058.Google Scholar

Gonçalves, SI. Correlating the alpha rhythm to BOLD using simultaneous EEG/fMRI: inter-subject variability. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla). 2006; 30(1): 203–213.Google Scholar

Laufs, H, Holt, J, Elfont, R, et al. Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla). 2006; 31(4): 1408–1418.Google Scholar

de Munck, JC. The hemodynamic response of the alpha rhythm: An EEG/fMRI study. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla). 2007; 35(3): 1142–1151.Google Scholar PubMed

Klimesch, W, Sauseng, P, Hanslmayr, S. EEG alpha oscillations : The inhibition – timing hypothesis. 2006; 3. Brain Research Reviews. Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 63–88.Google Scholar

Näpflin, M, Wildi, M, Sarnthein, J. Test-retest reliability of resting EEG spectra validates a statistical signature of persons. Vol. 118, Clinical Neurophysiology. Sarnthein, Johannes: Universitatsspital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, CH-8091, [email protected]: Elsevier Science; 2007. pp. 2519–2524.Google Scholar

Begić, DD, Mahnik-Miloš, M, Grubišin, J. EEG characteristics in depression, “negative” and “positive” schizophrena. Psychiatr Danub. 2009; 21(4): 579–584.Google Scholar

Carlsson, A. The dopamine theory revisited. Schizophrenia. 1995; 379–400.Google Scholar

Olbrich, S, Van Dinteren, R, Arns, M. Personalized medicine: Review and perspectives of promising baseline EEG biomarkers in major depressive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychobiology. 2016; 72(3–4): 229–240.Google Scholar

Roemer, RA, Shagass, C, Dubin, W, Jaffe, R, Siegal, L. Quantitative EEG in elderly depressives. Brain Topogr. 1992; 4(4): 285–290.Google Scholar

Begic, D, Popovic-Knapic, V, Grubisin, J, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in schizophrenia and depression. Psychiatr Danub. 2011 December; 23(4): 355–362.Google Scholar

Jaworska, N, Blier, P, Fusee, W, Knott, V. α Power, α asymmetry and anterior cingulate cortex activity in depressed males and females. J Psychiatr Res [Internet]. 2012; 46(11): 1483–1491. Available from: www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3463760&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grin-Yatsenko, V a, Baas, I, Ponomarev, V a, Kropotov, JD. EEG power spectra at early stages of depressive disorders. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 26(6): 401–406.Google Scholar

Bruder, GE, Sedoruk, JP, Stewart, JW, et al. Electroencephalographic alpha measures predict therapeutic response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant: Pre- and post-treatment findings. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 63(12): 1171–1177.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davidson, RJ. Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In: Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press; 1995. pp. 361–387.Google Scholar

Davidson, RJ, Henriques, J. Regional brain function in sadness and depression. In: The Neuropsychology of Emotion. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 269–297. (Series in affective science.).Google Scholar

Davidson, RJ, Lewis, DA, Alloy, LB, et al. Neural and behavioral substrates of mood and mood regulation. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2002; 52(6): 478–502. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322302014580 Google Scholar

Tomarkenand, AJ, Keener, AD. Frontal brain asymmetry and depression: A self-regulatory perspective. Cogn Emot [Internet]. 1998 May 1; 12(3): 387–420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379655 Google Scholar

Micoulaud-Franchi, J-A, Richieri, R, Cermolacce, M, et al. Parieto-temporal alpha EEG band power at baseline as a predictor of antidepressant treatment response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A preliminary study. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2012; 137(1): 156–160. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032711007932 Google Scholar

Chang, JS, Yoo, CS, Yi, SH, et al. An integrative assessment of the psychophysiologic alterations in young women with recurrent major depressive disorder. Psychosom Med. 2012 June; 74(5): 495–500.Google Scholar

Henriques, JB, Davidson, RJ. Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 November; 100(4): 535–545.Google Scholar

Schaffer, CE, Davidson, RJ, Saron, C. Frontal and parietal electroencephalogram asymmetry in depressed and nondepressed subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 1983 July; 18(7): 753–762.Google Scholar

Kemp, AH, Griffiths, K, Felmingham, KL, et al. Disorder specificity despite comorbidity: Resting EEG alpha asymmetry in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2010; 85(2): 350–354. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.08.001 Google Scholar

Beeney, JE, Levy, KN, Gatzke-Kopp, LM, Hallquist, MN. EEG asymmetry in borderline personality disorder and depression following rejection. Personal Disord Theory, Res Treat. 2014; 5(2): 178–185.Google Scholar

Gollan, JK, Hoxha, D, Chihade, D, et al. Frontal alpha EEG asymmetry before and after behavioral activation treatment for depression. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2014; 99: 198–208. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051114000623 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Olbrich, S, Arns, M. EEG biomarkers in major depressive disorder: Discriminative power and prediction of treatment response. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013; 25(5): 604–618.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

van der Vinne, N, Vollebregt, MA, van Putten, MJAM, Arns, M. Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis. NeuroImage Clin. 2017; 16(July): 79–87.Google Scholar

Davidson, RJ. Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization. In: Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 1985. pp. 320–365.Google Scholar

Kelley, NJ, Hortensius, R, Schutter, DJLG, Harmon-Jones, E. The relationship of approach/avoidance motivation and asymmetric frontal cortical activity: A review of studies manipulating frontal asymmetry. Int J Psychophysiol [Internet]. 2017; 119: 19–30. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876017301770 Google Scholar

Debener, S, Beauducel, A, Nessler, D, et al. Is resting anterior EEG alpha asymmetry a trait marker for depression? Findings for healthy adults and clinically depressed patients. Neuropsychobiology. 2000; 41(1): 31–37.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pizzagalli, DA, Nitschke, JB, Oakes, TR, et al. Brain electrical tomography in depression: the importance of symptom severity, anxiety, and melancholic features. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2002; 52(2): 73–85. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322302013136 Google Scholar

Allen, JJB, Coan, JA, Nazarian, M. Issues and assumptions on the road from raw signals to metrics of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2004; 67(1): 183–218. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051104000377 Google Scholar

Stewart, JL, Coan, JA, Towers, DN, Allen, JJB. Frontal EEG asymmetry during emotional challenge differentiates individuals with and without lifetime major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2011; 129(1–3): 167–174. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.029 Google Scholar

Thibodeau, R, Jorgensen, RS, Kim, S. Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: A meta-analytic review. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006; 115(4): 715–729.Google Scholar

Arns, M, Bruder, G, Hegerl, U, et al. EEG alpha asymmetry as a gender-specific predictor of outcome to acute treatment with different antidepressant medications in the randomized iSPOT-D study. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2016; 127(1): 509–519. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.05.032 Google Scholar

Carvalho, A, Moraes, H, Silveira, H, et al. EEG frontal asymmetry in the depressed and remitted elderly: Is it related to the trait or to the state of depression? J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2011; 129(1): 143–148. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032710005598 Google Scholar

Gold, C, Fachner, J, Erkkilä, J. Validity and reliability of electroencephalographic frontal alpha asymmetry and frontal midline theta as biomarkers for depression. Scand J Psychol [Internet]. 2013 April 1; 54(2): 118–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12022 Google Scholar

Reid, SA, Duke, LM, Allen, JJB. Resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression: Inconsistencies suggest the need to identify mediating factors. Psychophysiology [Internet]. 1998 July 1; 35(4): 389–404. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469–8986.3540389 Google Scholar

Segrave, RA, Cooper, NR, Thomson, RH, et al. Individualized Alpha Activity and Frontal Asymmetry in Major Depression. Clin EEG Neurosci [Internet]. 2011 January 1; 42(1): 45–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/155005941104200110 Google Scholar

Kentgen, M. L, Tenke, C, Pine, D, et al. Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: Influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2000; 109: 797–802.Google Scholar

Knott, V, Mahoney, C, Kennedy, S, Evans, K. EEG power, frequency, asymmetry and coherence in male depression. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging [Internet]. 2001; 106(2): 123–140. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492700000809 Google Scholar

Deldin, PJ, Chiu, P. Cognitive restructuring and EEG in major depression. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2005; 70(3): 141–151. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030105110500027X Google Scholar

Mathersul, D, Williams, LM, Hopkinson, PJ, Kemp, AH. Investigating models of affect: Relationships among EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and anxiety. Vol. 8, Emotion. Kemp, Andrew H.: The Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Hospital, Acacia House, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145, [email protected]: American Psychological Association; 2008. 560–572.Google Scholar

Quraan, MA, Protzner, AB, Daskalakis, ZJ, et al. EEG power asymmetry and functional connectivity as a marker of treatment effectiveness in DBS surgery for depression. Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2013 November 28; 39: 1270. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.330 Google Scholar

Price, GW, Lee, JW, Garvey, C, Gibson, N. Appraisal of sessional EEG features as a correlate of clinical changes in an rTMS treatment of depression. Clin EEG Neurosci [Internet]. 2008 July 1; 39(3): 131–138. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940803900307 Google Scholar

Allen, JJB, Kline, JP. Frontal EEG asymmetry, emotion, and psychopathology: The first, and the next 25 years. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2004; 67(1): 1–5. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051104000304 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaiser, AK, Doppelmayr, M, Iglseder, B. Electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry in geriatric depression. Z Gerontol Geriatr [Internet]. 2018; 51(2): 200–205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-016–1108-z Google Scholar

Bruder, GE, Stewart, JW, Tenke, CE, et al. Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant. Biol Psychiatry. 2001; 49(5): 416–425.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knott, V, Mahoney, C, Kennedy, S, Evans, K. Pre-treatment EEG and it’s relationship to depression severity and paroxetine treatment outcome. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2000; 33: 201–205.Google Scholar

Ulrich, G, Haug, H-J, Stieglietz, R-D, Fahndrich, E. EEG characteristics of clinically defined on-drug-responders and non-responders – A comparison clomipramine vs. maprotiline. Pharmacopsychiatry [Internet]. 1988; 21(6): 367–368. Available from: www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0–0024213743&partnerID=40&md5=73803912ace9ccfcd8af4ee36646e933 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baskaran, A, Farzan, F, Milev, R, et al. The comparative effectiveness of electroencephalographic indices in predicting response to escitalopram therapy in depression: A pilot study. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2017; 227(October 2017): 542–549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.028 Google Scholar

Knott, VJ, I. Telner, J, D. Lapierre, Y, et al. Quantitative EEG in the prediction of antidepressant response to imipramine. J Affect Disord. 1996 August 1; 39(3): 175–184.Google Scholar

Baskaran, A, Milev, R, McIntyre, RS. The neurobiology of the EEG biomarker as a predictor of treatment response in depression. Neuropharmacology. 2012; 63(4): 507–513.Google Scholar

Heller, W, A. Etienne, M, A. Miller, G. Patterns of perceptual asymmetry in depression and anxiety: Implications for neuropsychological models of emotion and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1995; 104: 327–333.Google Scholar

Arns, M, Spronk, D, Fitzgerald, PB. Potential differential effects of 9 Hz rTMS and 10 Hz rTMS in the treatment of depression. Brain Stimul. 2010; 3(2): 124–126.Google Scholar

Bench, CJ, Friston, KJ, Brown, RG, et al. The anatomy of melancholia–focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression. Psychol Med [Internet]. 1992; 22(3): 607–615. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1410086 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Drevets, WC, Videen, TO, Price, JL, et al. A functional anatomical study of unipolar depression. J Neurosci. 1992 September; 12(9): 3628–3641.Google Scholar

Mayberg, HS, Lewis, PJ, Regenold, W, Wagner, HNJ. Paralimbic hypoperfusion in unipolar depression. J Nucl Med. 1994 June; 35(6): 929–934.Google Scholar

Seminowicz, DA, Mayberg, HS, McIntosh, AR, et al. Limbic-frontal circuitry in major depression: a path modeling metanalysis. Neuroimage. 2004 May; 22(1): 409–418.Google Scholar

Klimesch, W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Rev [Internet]. 1999 April [cited 2014 August 15]; 29(2–3): 169–195. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017398000563 Google Scholar

Dharmadhikari, AS, Tandle, AL, Jaiswal, S V, et al. Frontal theta asymmetry as a biomarker of depression. East Asian Arch Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018; 28(1): 17–22. Available from: www.easap.asia/index.php/find-issues/current-issue/item/795–1803-v28n1-p17 Google Scholar

Kempermann, G, Kronenberg, G. Depressed new neurons – Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and a cellular plasticity hypothesis of major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54(5): 499–503.Google Scholar

Fingelkurts, AA, Fingelkurts, AA, Rytsälä, H, et al. Composition of brain oscillations in ongoing EEG during major depression disorder. Neurosci Res. 2006; 56(2): 133–144.Google Scholar

Iosifescu, DV. Electroencephalography-derived biomarkers of antidepressant response. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011; 19(3): 144–154.Google Scholar

Ishii, R, Shinosaki, K, Ukai, S, et al. Medial prefrontal cortex generates frontal midline theta rhythm. Neuroreport. 1999; 10(4): 675–679.Google Scholar

Asada, H, Fukuda, Y, Tsunoda, S, Yamaguchi, M, Tonoike, M. Frontal midline theta rhythms reflect alternative activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett. 1999; 274(1): 29–32.Google Scholar

Pizzagalli, DA, Oakes, TR, Davidson, RJ. Coupling of theta activity and glucose metabolism in the human rostral anterior cingulate cortex: An EEG/PET study of normal and depressed subjects. Psychophysiology. 2003; 40(6): 939–949.Google Scholar

Kwon, JS, Youn, T, Jung, HY. Right hemisphere abnormalities in major depression: Quantitative electroencephalographic findings before and after treatment. J Affect Disord. 1996; 40(3): 169–173.Google Scholar

Nystrom, C, Matousek, M, Hallstrom, T. Relationships between EEG and clinical characteristics in major depressive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986; 73(4): 390–394.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lieber, AL. Diagnosis and subtyping of depressive disorders by quantitative electroencephalography: II. Interhemispheric measures are abnormal in major depressives and frequency analysis may discriminate certain subtypes. The Hillside Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1988; 10: 84–97.Google Scholar

Arns, M, Etkin, A, Hegerl, U, et al. Frontal and rostral anterior cingulate (rACC) theta EEG in depression: Implications for treatment outcome? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol [Internet]. 2015; 25(8): 1190–1200. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.007 Google Scholar

Grin-Yatsenko, VA, Baas, I, Ponomarev, VA, Kropotov, JD. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG recordings at early stages of depressive disorders. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2010; 121(3): 281–289. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.015 Google Scholar

Degabriele, R, Lagopoulos, J. A review of EEG and ERP studies in bipolar disorder. Acta Neuropsychiatr [Internet]. 2014/06/24. 2009; 21(2): 58–66. Available from: www.cambridge.org/core/article/review-of-eeg-and-erp-studies-in-bipolar-disorder/C7825AAA07D3119CF55C54A4563ABCA2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Mientus, S, Gallinat, J, Wuebben, Y, et al. Cortical hypoactivation during resting EEG in schizophrenics but not in depressives and schizotypal subjects as revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Psychiatry Res – Neuroimaging. 2002; 116(1–2): 95–111.Google Scholar

Lubar, JF, Congedo, M, Askew, JH. Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) of cerebral activity in chronic depressive disorder. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 September; 49(3): 175–185.Google Scholar

Heikman, P, Salmelin, R, Mäkelä, JP, et al. Relation between frontal 3–7 Hz MEG activity and the efficacy of ECT in major depression. J ECT. 2001; 17(2): 136–140.Google Scholar

Iosifescu, D V., Greenwald, S, Devlin, P, et al. Frontal EEG predictors of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol [Internet]. 2009; 19(11): 772–777. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.06.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pizzagalli, DA. Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: Toward biomarkers of treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2011; 36(1): 183–206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.166 Google Scholar

Spronk, D, Arns, M, Barnett, KJ, Cooper, NJ, Gordon, E. An investigation of EEG, genetic and cognitive markers of treatment response to antidepressant medication in patients with major depressive disorder: A pilot study. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2011; 128(1–2): 41–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.021 Google Scholar

Korb, AS, Hunter, AM, Cook, IA, Leuchter, AF. Rostral anterior cingulate cortex theta current density and response to antidepressants and placebo in major depression. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2009; 120(7): 1313–1319. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.05.008 Google Scholar

Mulert, C, Juckel, G, Brunnmeier, M, et al. Prediction of treatment response in major depression: Integration of concepts. J Affect Disord. 2007; 98(3): 215–225.Google Scholar

Pizzagalli, DA, Pascual-Marqui, RD, Nitschke, JB, et al. Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: Evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis. Am J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2001; 158(3): 405–415. Available from: http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.405%5Cnfiles/523/Pizzagalli et al. – 2001 – Anterior Cingulate Activity as a Predictor of Degr.pdfGoogle Scholar

Watson, BO, Ding, M, Buzsáki, G. Temporal coupling of field potentials and action potentials in the neocortex. Eur J Neurosci [Internet]. 2018 October 1; 48(7): 2482–2497. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13807 Google Scholar

Nir, Y, Fisch, L, Mukamel, R, et al. Coupling between neuronal firing rate, gamma LFP, and BOLD fMRI is related to interneuronal correlations. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(15): 1275–1285.Google Scholar

Fries, P, Reynolds, JH, Rorie, AE, Desimone, R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science. 2001 February; 291(5508): 1560–1563.Google Scholar

Kim, H, Ährlund-Richter, S, Wang, X, Deisseroth, K, Carlén, M. Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons in control of attention. Cell. 2016; 164(1–2): 208–218.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, PJ, Watson, BO. Gamma oscillations as a biomarker for major depression: an emerging topic. Transl Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018; 8(1): 177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018–0239-y Google Scholar

Uhlhaas, PJ, Haenschel, C, Nikolić, D, Singer, W. The role of oscillations and synchrony in cortical networks and their putative relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull [Internet]. 2008 September [cited 2014 October 1]; 34(5): 927–943. Available from: www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2632472&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract Google Scholar

Colgin, LL, Denninger, T, Fyhn, M, et al. Frequency of gamma oscillations routes flow of information in the hippocampus. Nature [Internet]. 2009 November 19; 462: 353. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08573 Google Scholar

Fernández-Ruiz, A, Oliva, A, Nagy, GA, et al. Entorhinal-CA3 dual-input control of spike timing in the hippocampus by theta-gamma coupling. Neuron [Internet]. 2017; 93(5): 1213–1226.e5. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627317301010 Google Scholar

Spellman, T, Rigotti, M, Ahmari, SE, et al. Hippocampal–prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory. Nature [Internet]. 2015 June 8; 522: 309. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14445 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Strelets, VB, Garakh, Z V, Novototskiĭ-Vlasov, VI. Comparative study of the gamma-rhythm in the norm, pre-examination stress and patients with the first depressive episode. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova [Internet]. 2006; 56(2): 219–227. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16756129 Google Scholar

Lee, PS, Chen, YS, Hsieh, JC, Su, TP, Chen, LF. Distinct neuronal oscillatory responses between patients with bipolar and unipolar disorders: A magnetoencephalographic study. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2010; 123(1–3): 270–275. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.020 Google Scholar

Liu, TY, Chen, YS, Su, TP, Hsieh, JC, Chen, LF. Abnormal early gamma responses to emotional faces differentiate unipolar from bipolar disorder patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014.Google Scholar

Pizzagalli, DA, Peccoralo, LA, Davidson, RJ, Cohen, JD. Resting anterior cingulate activity and abnormal responses to errors in subjects with elevated depressive symptoms: A 128-channel EEG study. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 2006 March 1; 27(3): 185–201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20172 Google Scholar

Isomura, S, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, et al. Differentiation between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder by auditory steady-state responses. J Affect Disord. 2016; 190(2016): 800–806.Google Scholar

Oda, Y, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, Hirano, S, Oribe, N, Ueno, T, et al. Gamma band neural synchronization deficits for auditory steady state responses in bipolar disorder patients. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012 July; 7(7): e39955. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039955 Google Scholar

Liu, T-Y, Hsieh, J-C, Chen, Y-S, et al. Different patterns of abnormal gamma oscillatory activity in unipolar and bipolar disorder patients during an implicit emotion task. Neuropsychologia [Internet]. 2012 June [cited 2014 October 3]; 50(7): 1514–1520. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22406691 Google Scholar

Berman, RM, Cappiello, A, Anand, A, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 February; 47(4): 351–354.Google Scholar

Hong, LE, Summerfelt, A, Buchanan, RW, et al. Gamma and delta neural oscillations and association with clinical symptoms under subanesthetic ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2009 November 4; 35: 632. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.168 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Muthukumaraswamy, SD, Shaw, AD, Jackson, LE, et al. Evidence that subanesthetic doses of Ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 August 19; 35(33): 11694LP–11706. Available from: www.jneurosci.org/content/35/33/11694.abstract Google Scholar

Shaw, AD, Saxena, N, Jackson, LE, et al. Ketamine amplifies induced gamma frequency oscillations in the human cerebral cortex. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol [Internet]. 2015; 25(8): 1136–1146. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.04.012 Google Scholar

Nugent, AC, Ballard, ED, Gould, TD, et al. Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018–0028-2 Google Scholar

Noda, Y, Zomorrodi, R, Saeki, T, et al. Resting-state EEG gamma power and theta–gamma coupling enhancement following high-frequency left dorsolateral prefrontal rTMS in patients with depression. Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2017; 128(3): 424–432. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.023 Google Scholar

Bailey, NW, Hoy, KE, Rogasch, NC, et al. Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders. Brain Stimul [Internet]. 2018; 11(1): 190–203. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.015 Google Scholar

Pathak, Y, Salami, O, Baillet, S, Li, Z, Butson, CR. Longitudinal Changes in Depressive Circuitry in Response to Neuromodulation Therapy [Internet]. Vol. 10, Frontiers in Neural Circuits; 2016. p. 50. Available from: www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncir.2016.00050 Google Scholar

Belmaker, RH, Agam, G. Major depressive disorder. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2008 January 3; 358(1): 55–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra073096 Google Scholar

Gandal, MJ, Haney, JR, Parikshak, NN, et al. Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2018 February 9; 359(6376): 693LP–697. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6376/693.abstract Google Scholar

Drysdale, AT, Grosenick, L, Downar, J, et al. HHS Public Access. 2017; 23(1): 28–38.Google Scholar

References

Hansen, PC, Kringelbach, ML, Salmelin, R, editors. MEG: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar

Hari, R, Puce, A, editors. MEG-EEG Primer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.Google Scholar

Supek, S, Aine, CJ, editors. Magnetoencephalography: From Signals to Dynamic Cortical Networks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2014.Google Scholar

Boto, E, Holmes, N, Leggett, J, et al. Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system. Nature. 2018; 555(7698): 657–661.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

Salustri, C, Tecchio, F, Zappasodi, F, et al. Cortical excitability and rest activity properties in patients with depression. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2007; 32(4): 259–266.Google Scholar

Kurita, S, Takei, Y, Maki, Y, et al. Magnetoencephalography study of the effect of attention modulation on somatosensory processing in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2016; 70(2): 116–125.Google Scholar

Cornwell, BR, Salvadore, G, Furey, M, et al. Synaptic potentiation is critical for rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2012; 72(7): 555–561.Google Scholar

Nugent, AC, Wills, KE, Gilbert, JR, Zarate, Jr CA. Synaptic Potentiation and Rapid Antidepressant Response to Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Replication Study. In Revision.Google Scholar

Gilbert, JR, Yarrington, JS, Wills, KE, Nugent, AC, Zarate, CA, Jr. Glutamatergic signaling drives ketamine-mediated response in depression: Evidence from dynamic causal modeling. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21(8): 740–747.Google Scholar

Wang, Y, Jia, Y, Feng, Y, et al. Overlapping auditory M100 and M200 abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A MEG study. Schizophrenia Research. 2014; 160(1–3): 201–207.Google Scholar

Kähkönen, S, Yamashita, H, Rytsälä, H, et al. Dysfunction in early auditory processing in major depressive disorder revealed by combined MEG and EEG. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2007; 32(5): 316–222.Google Scholar

Takei, Y, Kumano, S, Hattori, S, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in major depression: A magnetoencephalography study using auditory mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46(1): 52–61.Google Scholar

Takei, Y, Kumano, S, Maki, Y, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: A MEG study using auditory mismatch negativity. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2010; 34(6): 903–912.Google Scholar

Wang, Y, Feng, Y, Jia, Y, et al. Absence of auditory M100 source asymmetry in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A MEG study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(12).Google Scholar PubMed

Hegerl, U, Juckel, G. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: A new hypothesis. Biol Psychiatry. 1993; 33(3): 173–187.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, N, Hirano, Y, Nakamura, I, et al. Right hemisphere pitch-mismatch negativity reduction in patients with major depression: An MEG study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2017; 215: 225–229.Google Scholar

Shimano, S, Onitsuka, T, Oribe, N, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in patients with bipolar disorder as revealed by the pitch-mismatch negativity: A magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Bipolar Disorders. 2014; 16(6): 592–599.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Isomura, S, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, et al. Differentiation between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder by auditory steady-state responses. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 190: 800–806.Google Scholar

Oda, Y, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, et al. Gamma band neural synchronization deficits for auditory steady state responses in bipolar disorder patients. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(7).Google Scholar

Hirano, Y, Oribe, N, Kanba, S, et al. Spontaneous gamma activity in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(8): 813–821.Google Scholar

Nugent, AC, Ballard, ED, Gould, TD, et al. Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry. 2018; 24(7): 1040–1052.Google Scholar

Noda, Y, Zomorrodi, R, Saeki, T, et al. Resting-state EEG gamma power and theta-gamma coupling enhancement following high-frequency left dorsolateral prefrontal rTMS in patients with depression. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128(3): 424–432.Google Scholar

Kam, JW, Bolbecker, AR, O’Donnell, BF, Hetrick, WP, Brenner, CA. Resting state EEG power and coherence abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013; 47(12): 1893–1901.Google Scholar

Reite, M, Teale, P, Rojas, DC, et al. MEG auditory evoked fields suggest altered structural/functional asymmetry in primary but not secondary auditory cortex in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 2009; 11(4): 371–381.Google Scholar

Wang, Y, Feng, Y, Jia, Y, et al. Auditory M50 and M100 sensory gating deficits in bipolar disorder: A MEG study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2014; 152–154(1): 131–138.Google Scholar

Oribe, N, Onitsuka, T, Hirano, S, et al. Differentiation between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia revealed by neural oscillation to speech sounds: An MEG study. Bipolar Disorders. 2010; 12(8): 804–812.Google Scholar

Domschke, K, Zwanzger, P, Rehbein, MA, et al. Magnetoencephalographic correlates of emotional processing in major depression before and after pharmacological treatment. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 19(2): 1–9.Google Scholar

Xu, Q, Ruohonen, EM, Ye, C, et al. Automatic processing of changes in facial emotions in dysphoria: A magnetoencephalography study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2018; 12.Google Scholar

Moratti, S, Rubio, G, Campo, P, Keil, A, Ortiz, T. Hypofunction of right temporoparietal cortex during emotional arousal in depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008; 65(5): 532–541.Google Scholar

Moratti, S, Strange, B, Rubio, G. Emotional arousal modulation of right temporoparietal cortex in depression depends on parental depression status in women: First evidence. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015; 178: 79–87.Google Scholar

Disner, SG, Beevers, CG, Haigh, EA, Beck, AT. Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(8): 467–477.Google Scholar

Salvadore, G, Cornwell, BR, Colon-Rosario, V, et al. Increased anterior cingulate cortical activity in response to fearful faces: A neurophysiological biomarker that predicts rapid antidepressant response to ketamine. Biological Psychiatry. 2009; 65(4): 289–295.Google Scholar

Lu, Q, Bi, K, Liu, C, et al. Predicting depression based on dynamic regional connectivity: A windowed Granger causality analysis of MEG recordings. Brain Research. 2013; 1535: 52–60.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lu, Q, Li, H, Luo, G, et al. Impaired prefrontal-amygdala effective connectivity is responsible for the dysfunction of emotion process in major depressive disorder: A dynamic causal modeling study on MEG. Neuroscience Letters. 2012; 523(2): 125–130.Google Scholar

Lu, Q, Wang, Y, Luo, G, Li, H, Yao, Z. Dynamic connectivity laterality of the amygdala under negative stimulus in depression: A MEG study. Neuroscience Letters. 2013; 547: 42–47.Google Scholar

Bi, K, Hua, L, Wei, M, et al. Dynamic functional-structural coupling within acute functional state change phases: Evidence from a depression recognition study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 191: 145–155.Google Scholar

Lu, Q, Jiang, H, Luo, G, Han, Y, Yao, Z. Multichannel matching pursuit of MEG signals for discriminative oscillation pattern detection in depression. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2013; 88(2): 206–212.Google Scholar

Lee, PS, Chen, YS, Hsieh, JC, Su, TP, Chen, LF. Distinct neuronal oscillatory responses between patients with bipolar and unipolar disorders: A magnetoencephalographic study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2010; 123(1–3): 270–275.Google Scholar

Liu, TY, Hsieh, JC, Chen, YS, et al. Different patterns of abnormal gamma oscillatory activity in unipolar and bipolar disorder patients during an implicit emotion task. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(7): 1514–1520.Google Scholar

McKinnon, MC, Yucel, K, Nazarov, A, MacQueen, GM. A meta-analysis examining clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009; 34(1): 41–54.Google Scholar

Cornwell, BR, Salvadore, G, Colon-Rosario, V, et al. Abnormal hippocampal functioning and impaired spatial navigation in depressed individuals: Evidence from whole-head magnetoencephalography. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2010; 167(7): 836–844.Google Scholar

Salvadore, G, Cornwell, BR, Sambataro, F, et al. Anterior cingulate desynchronization and functional connectivity with the amygdala during a working memory task predict rapid antidepressant response to ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(7): 1415–1422.Google Scholar

Ionescu, DF, Nugent, AC, Luckenbaugh, DA, et al. Baseline working memory activation deficits in dimensional anxious depression as detected by magnetoencephalography. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2015; 27(3): 143–152.Google Scholar

Fernández, A, Rodriguez-Palancas, A, López-Ibor, M, et al. Increased occipital delta dipole density in major depressive disorder determined by magnetoencephalography. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2005; 30(1): 17–23.Google Scholar

Maihöfner, C, Ropohl, A, Reulbach, U, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: A magnetoencephalographic study. NeuroReport. 2005; 16(16): 1839–1842.Google Scholar

Al-Timemy, AH, Fernandez, A, Escudero, J, editors. Spectral Analysis of Resting State Magnetoencephalogram Activity in Patients with Bipolar Disorder. 2014.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jiang, H, Popov, T, Jylänki, P, et al. Predictability of depression severity based on posterior alpha oscillations. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016; 127(4): 2108–2114.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Linkenkaer-Hansen, K, Monto, S, Rytsälä, H, et al. Breakdown of long-range temporal correlations in theta oscillations in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 25(44): 10131–10137.Google Scholar

Buzsaki, G, Wang, XJ. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 203–225.Google Scholar

Gandal, MJ, Sisti, J, Klook, K, et al. GABAB-mediated rescue of altered excitatory-inhibitory balance, gamma synchrony and behavioral deficits following constitutive NMDAR-hypofunction. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e142.Google Scholar

Duman, RS, Aghajanian, GK. Synaptic dysfunction in depression: Potential therapeutic targets. Science. 2012; 338(6103): 68–72.Google Scholar

Bachmann, M, Paeske, L, Kalev, K, et al. Methods for classifying depression in single channel EEG using linear and nonlinear signal analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018; 155: 11–17.Google Scholar

Strelets, VB, Garakh Zh, V, Novototskii-Vlasov, VY. Comparative study of the gamma rhythm in normal conditions, during examination stress, and in patients with first depressive episode. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007; 37(4): 387–394.Google Scholar

Shaw, AD, Saxena, N, Jackson, LE, et al. Ketamine amplifies induced gamma frequency oscillations in the human cerebral cortex. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 25(8): 1136–1146.Google Scholar

Zanos, P, Moaddel, R, Morris, PJ, et al. NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature. 2016; 533(7604): 481–486.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stam, CJ. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116(10): 2266–2301.Google Scholar

Méndez, MA, Zuluaga, P, Hornero, R, et al. Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity: Effects of depression and antidepressant treatment. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2012; 26(5): 636–643.Google Scholar

Fernández, A, Al-Timemy, AH, Ferre, F, Rubio, G, Escudero, J. Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity in mood disorders: A magnetoencephalography study of bipolar disorder and major depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2018; 84: 112–117.Google Scholar

Brookes, MJ, Woolrich, MW, Barnes, GR. Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: A multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(2): 910–920.Google Scholar

Brookes, MJ, Tewarie, PK, Hunt, BAE, et al. A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis. Neuroimage. 2016; 132: 425–438.Google Scholar

Colclough, GL, Brookes, MJ, Smith, SM, Woolrich, MW. A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes. Neuroimage. 2015; 117: 439–448.Google Scholar

Chen, SS, Tu, PC, Su, TP, et al. Impaired frontal synchronization of spontaneous magnetoencephalographic activity in patients with bipolar disorder. Neuroscience Letters. 2008; 445(2): 174–178.Google Scholar

Nugent, AC, Robinson, SE, Coppola, R, Furey, ML, Zarate, CA, Jr. Group differences in MEG-ICA derived resting state networks: Application to major depressive disorder. NeuroImage. 2015; 118: 1–12.Google Scholar

Muthukumaraswamy, SD, Shaw, AD, Jackson, LE, et al. Evidence that subanesthetic doses of ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015; 35(33): 11694–11706.Google Scholar

Zhang, S, Tian, S, Chattun, MR, et al. A supplementary functional connectivity microstate attached to the default mode network in depression revealed by resting-state magnetoencephalography. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2018; 83: 76–85.Google Scholar

Wise, T, Marwood, L, Perkins, AM, et al. Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: A two-sample confirmation study. Transl Psychiatry. 2017; 7(4): e1105.Google Scholar

Hamilton, JP, Farmer, M, Fogelman, P, Gotlib, IH. Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 78(4): 224–230.Google Scholar

Zhu, X, Zhu, Q, Shen, H, Liao, W, Yuan, F. Rumination and default mode network subsystems connectivity in first-episode, drug-naive young patients with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 43105.Google Scholar

Perera, T, George, MS, Grammer, G, et al. The clinical TMS society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(3): 336–346.Google Scholar

Pathak, Y, Salami, O, Baillet, S, Li, Z, Butson, CR. Longitudinal changes in depressive circuitry in response to neuromodulation therapy. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2016; 10(July 2016).Google Scholar

Li, CT, Chen, LF, Tu, PC, et al. Impaired prefronto-thalamic functional connectivity as a key feature of treatment-resistant depression: A combined MEG, PET and rTMS study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8).Google Scholar

References

Collins, FS, Varmus, H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 372(9): 793–795.Google Scholar

Insel, TR, Cuthbert, BN. Brain disorders? precisely. Science. 2015; 348(6234): 499–500.Google Scholar

Mrazek, DA, Hornberger, JC, Anthony Altar, C, Degtiar, I. A Review of the clinical, economic, and societal burden of treatment-resistant depression: 1996–2013. Psychiatric Services. 2014; 65(8): 977–987.Google Scholar

Wong, EHF, Yocca, F, Smith, MA, Lee, C-M. Challenges and opportunities for drug discovery in psychiatric disorders: The drug hunters’ perspective. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 October; 13(9): 1269–1284.Google Scholar

Hofmann, SG, Asnaani, A, Vonk, IJJ, Sawyer, AT, Fang, A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2012; 36(5): 427–440.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cuthbert, BN, Insel, TR. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. 2013 May 14; 11: 126.Google Scholar

Bzdok, D, Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Machine learning for precision psychiatry: Opportunities and challenges. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 March; 3(3): 223–30.Google Scholar PubMed

Iniesta, R, Stahl, D, McGuffin, P. Machine learning, statistical learning and the future of biological research in psychiatry. Psychol Med. 2016 September; 46(12): 2455–2465.Google Scholar

Varoquaux, G, Thirion, B. How machine learning is shaping cognitive neuroimaging. Gigascience. 2014 November 17; 3: 28.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Librenza-Garcia, D, Kotzian, BJ, Yang, J, et al. The impact of machine learning techniques in the study of bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017; 80: 538–554.Google Scholar

Mwangi, B, Matthews, K, Douglas Steele, J. Prediction of illness severity in patients with major depression using structural MR brain scans. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012; 35(1): 64–71.Google Scholar

Williams, LM. Defining biotypes for depression and anxiety based on large-scale circuit dysfunction: A theoretical review of the evidence and future directions for clinical translation. Depress Anxiety. 2017 January; 34(1): 9–24.Google Scholar

Maia, TV, Frank, MJ. From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2011 February; 14(2): 154–162.Google Scholar

Huys, QJ, Pizzagalli, DA, Bogdan, R, Dayan, P. Mapping anhedonia onto reinforcement learning: a behavioural meta-analysis. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2013 June 19; 3(1): 12.Google Scholar

Mwangi, B, Tian, TS, Soares, JC. A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging. Neuroinformatics. 2014 April; 12(2): 229–244.Google Scholar

Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R, Wainwright, M. Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations. CRC Press; 2015. 367.Google Scholar

Cristianini, N, Shawe-Taylor, J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press; 2000. 189.Google Scholar

Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R, Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer; 2009.CrossRef Google Scholar

Plis, SM, Hjelm, DR, Salakhutdinov, R, et al. Deep learning for neuroimaging: A validation study. Front Neurosci. 2014 August 20; 8: 229.Google Scholar

Deutsch, H-P. Principle component analysis. In: Derivatives and Internal Models. Palgrave Macmillan, London; 2002. pp. 539–547. (Finance and Capital Markets Series).Google Scholar

Stone, JV. Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction. MIT Press; 2004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kruskal, JB. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika. 1964; 29(1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Roweis, ST. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science. 2000; 290(5500): 2323–2326.Google Scholar

Lee, DD, Seung, HS. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature. 1999 October 21; 401(6755): 788–791.Google Scholar

van der Maaten, L, Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008 November 8; 9: 2579–2605.Google Scholar

Calhoun, VD, Liu, J, Adali, T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. NeuroImage. 2009; 45(1): S163–S172.Google Scholar

Jolliffe, IT. Principal Component Analysis. Springer; 2002. (Springer Series in Statistics).Google Scholar

Hartigan, JA, Wong, MA. Algorithm, AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics. 1979; 28(1): 100.Google Scholar

Cheng, Y. Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1995; 17(8): 790–799.Google Scholar

Johnson, SC. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika. 1967; 32(3): 241–254.Google Scholar

Marquand, AF, Wolfers, T, Dinga, R. Phenomapping: Methods and measures for deconstructing diagnosis in psychiatry. Personalized Psychiatry. 2019; 119–134.Google Scholar

Zhou, X-H, Obuchowski, NA, McClish, DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley; 2011. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics).Google Scholar

Rousseeuw, PJ. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1987; 20: 53–65.Google Scholar

Mwangi, B, Soares, JC, Hasan, KM. Visualization and unsupervised predictive clustering of high-dimensional multimodal neuroimaging data. J Neurosci Methods. 2014 October 30; 236: 19–25.Google Scholar

Zhang, W, Xiao, Y, Sun, H, et al. Discrete patterns of cortical thickness in youth with bipolar disorder differentially predict treatment response to quetiapine but not lithium. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(11): 2256–2263.Google Scholar

Marquand, AF, Wolfers, T, Mennes, M, Buitelaar, J, Beckmann, CF. Beyond lumping and splitting: A review of computational approaches for stratifying psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 September; 1(5): 433–447.Google Scholar

Wu, M-J, Mwangi, B, Bauer, IE, et al. Identification and individualized prediction of clinical phenotypes in bipolar disorders using neurocognitive data, neuroimaging scans and machine learning. Neuroimage. 2017 January 15; 145(Pt B): 254–264.Google Scholar

Dunn, JC. Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. Journal of Cybernetics. 1974; 4(1): 95–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davies, DL, Bouldin, DW. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1979; PAMI-1(2): 224–227.Google Scholar

Tibshirani, R, Walther, G, Hastie, T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). 2001; 63(2): 411–423.Google Scholar

Hubert, L, Schultz, J. Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1976; 29(2): 190–241.Google Scholar

Günter, S, Bunke, H. Validation indices for graph clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2003; 24(8): 1107–1113.Google Scholar

Bishop, CM. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer Verlag; 2006.Google Scholar

Kim, Y-K, Na, K-S. Application of machine learning classification for structural brain MRI in mood disorders: Critical review from a clinical perspective. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 January 3; 80(Pt B): 71–80.Google Scholar

Dusi, N, De Carlo, V, Delvecchio, G, Bellani, M, Soares, JC, Brambilla, P. MRI features of clinical outcome in bipolar disorder: A selected review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019; 243: 559–563.Google Scholar

Yoshida, K, Shimizu, Y, Yoshimoto, J, et al. Prediction of clinical depression scores and detection of changes in whole-brain using resting-state functional MRI data with partial least squares regression. PLoS One. 2017 July 12; 12(7): e0179638.Google Scholar

Rosa, AR, Sánchez-Moreno, J, Martínez-Aran, A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health. 2007; 3(1): 5.Google Scholar

Sartori, JM, Reckziegel, R, Passos, IC, et al. Volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging predicts functioning in bipolar disorder: A machine learning approach. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 August; 103: 237–243.Google Scholar

Han, LKM, Dinga, R, Hahn, T, et al. Brain Aging in Major Depressive Disorder: Results from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 5]. p. 560623. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/560623 Google Scholar

Nunes, A, for the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group, Schnack HG, Ching CRK, Agartz I, Akudjedu TN, et al. Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group. Molecular Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018–0228-9 Google Scholar

Grisanzio, KA, Goldstein-Piekarski, AN, Wang, MY, et al. Transdiagnostic symptom clusters and associations with brain, behavior, and daily function in mood, anxiety, and trauma disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018; 75(2): 201.Google Scholar

Dinga, R, Schmaal, L, Penninx, BWJH, et al. Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: Methodological replication and extension of. Neuroimage Clin. 2019 March 27; 22: 101796.Google Scholar

Harmer, CJ, Duman, RS, Cowen, PJ. How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 May; 4(5): 409–418.Google Scholar

Rutledge, RB, Chekroud, AM, Huys, QJ. Machine learning and big data in psychiatry: toward clinical applications. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 April; 55: 152–159.Google Scholar

Webb, CA, Trivedi, MH, Cohen, ZD, et al. Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: Evidence from the EMBARC study. Psychol Med. 2019 May; 49(7): 1118–1127.Google Scholar

Rush, AJ, John Rush, A, Fava, M, et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): Rationale and design. Controlled Clinical Trials. 2004; 25(1): 119–142.Google Scholar

Paul, R, Andlauer, TFM, Czamara, D, et al. Treatment response classes in major depressive disorder identified by model-based clustering and validated by clinical prediction models. Translational Psychiatry [Internet]. 2019; 9(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019–0524-4 Google Scholar

Khodayari-Rostamabad, A, Reilly, JP, Hasey, GM, de Bruin, H, MacCrimmon, DJ. A machine learning approach using EEG data to predict response to SSRI treatment for major depressive disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013; 124(10): 1975–1985.Google Scholar

Iniesta, R, Malki, K, Maier, W, et al. Combining clinical variables to optimize prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes. J Psychiatr Res. 2016 July; 78: 94–102.Google Scholar

Kautzky, A, Dold, M, Bartova, L, et al. Refining prediction in treatment-resistant depression: Results of machine learning analyses in the TRD III sample. J Clin Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018; 79(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.16m11385 Google Scholar

Cao, B, Luo, Q, Fu, Y, et al. Predicting individual responses to the electroconvulsive therapy with hippocampal subfield volumes in major depression disorder. Sci Rep. 2018 April 3; 8(1): 5434.Google Scholar

Redlich, R, Opel, N, Grotegerd, D, et al. Prediction of individual response to electroconvulsive therapy via machine learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 73(6): 557.Google Scholar

Fleck, DE, Ernest, N, Adler, CM, et al. Prediction of lithium response in first-episode mania using the LITHium Intelligent Agent (LITHIA): Pilot data and proof-of-concept. Bipolar Disord. 2017 June; 19(4): 259–272.Google Scholar

Tseng, H-H, Luo, Y, Cui, S, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer. Med Phys. 2017 December; 44(12): 6690–6705.Google Scholar

Schofield, P, Crosland, A, Waheed, W, et al. Patients’ views of antidepressants: From first experiences to becoming expert. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 April; 61(585): 142–148.Google Scholar

Kessler, RC, Warner, CH, Ivany, C, et al. Predicting suicides after psychiatric hospitalization in US army soldiers: the army study to assess risk and rEsilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS). JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 January; 72(1): 49–57.Google Scholar

Tran, T, Luo, W, Phung, D, et al. Risk stratification using data from electronic medical records better predicts suicide risks than clinician assessments. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 14; 14: 76.Google Scholar

Passos, IC, Mwangi, B, Cao, B, et al. Identifying a clinical signature of suicidality among patients with mood disorders: A pilot study using a machine learning approach. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 193: 109–116.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Castro, VM, Roberson, AM, McCoy, TH, Wiste, A, Cagan, A, Smoller, JW, et al. Stratifying risk for renal insufficiency among lithium-treated patients: An electronic health record study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 March; 41(4): 1138–1143.Google Scholar

Mwangi, B, Wu, M-J, Cao, B, et al. Individualized prediction and clinical staging of bipolar disorders using neuroanatomical biomarkers. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 March 1; 1(2): 186–194.Google Scholar

Cao, B, Passos, IC, Mwangi, B, et al. Hippocampal volume and verbal memory performance in late-stage bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2016 February; 73: 102–107.Google Scholar

Lavagnino, L, Cao, B, Mwangi, B, -J. et al. Changes in the corpus callosum in women with late-stage bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2015; 131(6): 458–464.Google Scholar

Passos, IC, Mwangi, B, Vieta, E, Berk, M, Kapczinski, F. Areas of controversy in neuroprogression in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 August; 134(2): 91–103.Google Scholar

Kapczinski, NS, Mwangi, B, Cassidy, RM, et al. Neuroprogression and illness trajectories in bipolar disorder. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2017; 17(3): 277–285.Google Scholar

Silva, RF, Plis, SM. How to Integrate Data from Multiple Biological Layers in Mental Health? [Internet]. Personalized Psychiatry. 2019. p. 135–59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978–3-030–03553-2_8 Google Scholar

Honeine, P, Richard, C. Solving the pre-image problem in kernel machines: A direct method. 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing [Internet]. 2009; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mlsp.2009.5306204 Google Scholar

Jobin, A, Ienca, M, Vayena, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence [Internet]. 2019; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019–0088-2 Google Scholar

Varoquaux, G, Raamana, PR, Engemann, DA, et al. Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines. Neuroimage. 2017 January 15; 145(Pt B): 166–179.Google Scholar

Thompson, PM, Stein, JL, Medland, SE, et al. The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014; 8(2): 153.Google Scholar

Zhu, D, Riedel, BC, Jahanshad, N, et al. Classification of major depressive disorder via multi-site weighted LASSO model. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017. 2017; 159–167.Google Scholar

Developing Software Precertification Program: A Working Model [Internet]. FDA U.S. Food & Drug Administration; 2018 June. Available from: www.fda.gov/media/113802/download Google Scholar

Horvitz, E, Mulligan, D. Data, privacy, and the greater good. Science. 2015; 349(6245): 253–255.Google Scholar

Ohno-Machado, L, Bafna, V, Boxwala, AA, et al. iDASH: Integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2012; 19(2): 196–201.Google Scholar

Peterson, K, Deeduvanu, R, Kanjamala, P, Boles, K. A blockchain-based approach to health information exchange networks. NIST Workshop Blockchain Healthcare. 2016 September; 1: 1–10.Google Scholar

Passos, IC, Ballester, P, Barros, RC, et al. Machine learning and big data analytics in bipolar disorder: A Position paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Big Data Task Force. Bipolar Disorders [Internet]. 2019; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12828 Google Scholar

Vayena, E, Blasimme, A, Glenn Cohen, I. Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med. 2018 November 6; 15(11): e1002689.Google Scholar

Gianfrancesco, MA, Tamang, S, Yazdany, J, Schmajuk, G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018; 178(11): 1544.Google Scholar

O’Neil, C. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Books; 2016.Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 4 - Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive