Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:31:03.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The special case of monitoring attempts at restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2009

Barbara J. Downes
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Leon A. Barmuta
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Peter G. Fairweather
Affiliation:
Flinders University of South Australia
Daniel P. Faith
Affiliation:
Australian Museum, Sydney
Michael J. Keough
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
P. S. Lake
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Not all assessments involve decisions about detecting an impact. Given that many substantial impacts have already occurred, there will be an increasing number (we hope) of programs geared towards assessing the success of restoration and rehabilitation programs. During the century ahead, we believe that an expanding response to human impacts on riverine ecosystems will be to attempt to restore them to some defined condition, such as a previous, less-impacted status. Such attempts to augment nature have considerable theoretical interest to ecologists as well as obvious practical implications for managers. It has often been said that the ultimate test of our understanding of an ecosystem is to create or repair a habitat and its function.

Ecological restoration is an applied approach to fixing environmental problems once they are diagnosed. It has arisen from a variety of practical starting points (Ehrenfeld 2000) and as such is not, as yet, a coherent and focused sub-discipline within scientific ecology. We see considerable confusion currently about the aims and techniques applicable to restoration monitoring (see also the critique by Chapman & Underwood 2000) but also appreciate the importance of going beyond merely detecting problems to trying to fix them.

We also do not wish to get entangled in subtle distinctions among ‘restoration’, ‘rehabilitation’, ‘regreening’ or ‘ecological landscaping’ (see Samways 2000) – if you are going to act then the outcome needs to be monitored. Our emphasis here is on being explicit about what you are trying to do regardless of the label you give it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Monitoring Ecological Impacts
Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters
, pp. 368 - 380
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×