Book contents
- Money Matters in Migration
- Money Matters in Migration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Money Matters in Migration: A Synthetic Approach
- Part I Migration
- 2 The Changing Landscape of Multilateral Financing and Global Migration Governance
- 3 Digging a Moat around Fortress Europe: EU Funding as an Instrument of Exclusion
- 4 The “Refugee Hospital”. Aid Money, Migration Politics, and Uncertain Care in Neoliberal Morocco
- 5 Cash Rules Everything: Money and Migration in the Colombian-Venezuelan Borderlands
- 6 Recruitment Fees, Indebtedness, and the Impairment of Asian Migrant Workers’ Rights
- 7 Pushing Out the Poor: Unstable Income and Termination of Residence
- 8 Follow the Money: Income Requirements in Norwegian Immigration Regulations
- Part II Participation
- Part III Citizenship
- Index
- References
8 - Follow the Money: Income Requirements in Norwegian Immigration Regulations
from Part I - Migration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 November 2021
Book contents
- Money Matters in Migration
- Money Matters in Migration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Money Matters in Migration: A Synthetic Approach
- Part I Migration
- 2 The Changing Landscape of Multilateral Financing and Global Migration Governance
- 3 Digging a Moat around Fortress Europe: EU Funding as an Instrument of Exclusion
- 4 The “Refugee Hospital”. Aid Money, Migration Politics, and Uncertain Care in Neoliberal Morocco
- 5 Cash Rules Everything: Money and Migration in the Colombian-Venezuelan Borderlands
- 6 Recruitment Fees, Indebtedness, and the Impairment of Asian Migrant Workers’ Rights
- 7 Pushing Out the Poor: Unstable Income and Termination of Residence
- 8 Follow the Money: Income Requirements in Norwegian Immigration Regulations
- Part II Participation
- Part III Citizenship
- Index
- References
Summary
Following the 2015 refugee crisis, Norwegian politicians introduced proposals to extend a family reunification income requirement to refugee sponsors and to introduce an income requirement for permanent residence. Family sponsors must make enough money to qualify; and migrants must ‘get to work’ to qualify for permanent stay. This chapter seeks to explain why one of the income requirements was implemented and the other not. It harnesses Carol Lee Bacchi’s approach to policy analysis, asking, ‘What is the problem represented to be?’ in a close reading of relevant documents. It finds the two requirements inscribed into different narratives. One narrative establishes the arrival of an unprecedented number of asylum seekers foremost as a problem for the Norwegian society and the sustainability of the welfare state. An alternative problem representation brings attention to the concrete effects of such requirements on specific groups of refugees. The analysis identifies an economic drift and stratification of migrants’ rights. It argues this drift is part of the more general development in Europe, where money has become a more important tool to regulate migration.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Money Matters in MigrationPolicy, Participation, and Citizenship, pp. 130 - 146Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bacchi, Carol Lee. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented To Be? Frenchs Forest, N.S.W.: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa. 2017. Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bech, Emily Cochran, Borevi, Karin, and Mouritsen, Per. 2017. ‘A “Civic Turn” in Scandinavian Family Migration Policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden’. Comparative Migration Studies 5, no. 1: 7.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2018. ‘The “Migrant with Poor Prospects”: Racialized Intersections of Class and Culture in Dutch Civic Integration Debates’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41, no. 5: 882–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratsberg, Bernt and Raaum, Oddbjørn. 2010. ‘Effekter Av Krav Om Forsørgelsesevne Ved Familiegjenforening’. 4/2010 Oslo: Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research. www.frisch.uio.no/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp10_04.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brekke, Jan-Paul and Staver, Anne. 2018. ‘The Renationalisation of Migration Policies in Times of Crisis: The Case of Norway’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, no. 13: 2163–2181.Google Scholar
Brochmann, Grete and Hagelund, Anniken. 2011. ‘Migrants in the Scandinavian Welfare State’. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 1, no. 1: 13–24.Google Scholar
Charsley, Katharine, Bolognani, Marta, Ersanilli, Evelyn, and Spencer, Sarah. 2020. Marriage Migration and Integration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggebø, Helga. 2010. ‘The Problem of Dependency: Immigration, Gender, and the Welfare State’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 17, no. 3: 295–322.Google Scholar
Eggebø, Helga 2013. ‘The Regulation of Marriage Migration to Norway’. PhD dissertation, The University of Bergen. At https://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/6421, accessed 22 November 2016.Google Scholar
Eggebø, Helga and Brekke, Jan-Paul. 2018. ‘Family Migration and Integration: A Literature Review’. 4 NF-Report Bodø: Nordland Research Institute. At www.nordlandsforskning.no/getfile.php/1322503-1526993549/Dokumenter/Rapporter/1018/NF-report%204_2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Eggebø, Helga and Staver, Anne. 2020. ‘Mer Midlertidighet – Innvandringspolitikken Etter Asylforliket’. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 37, no. 2: 125–136.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas. 2017. ‘Refugee Policy as “Negative Nation Branding”: The Case of Denmark and the Nordics’. Fischer, K. and Mouritzen, H. (eds.), Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2017. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, pp. 99–125.Google Scholar
Hernes, Vilde. 2018. ‘Cross-National Convergence in Times of Crisis? Integration Policies before, during and after the Refugee Crisis’. West European Politics 41, no. 6: 1305–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innst. 391 L. 2016. ‘Innst. 391 L (2015–2016) Innstilling fra kommunal- og forvaltningskomiteen om Endringer i utlendingsloven mv. (innstramninger II) [Recommendation from the Municipal and Management Committee concerning changes to the Immigration Act etc (Restrictions II)]’. At www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Publikasjoner/Innstillinger/Stortinget/2015-2016/inns-201516–391/, accessed 19 May 2018.Google Scholar
Kofman, Eleonore. 2018. ‘Family Migration as a Class Matter’. International Migration 56, no. 4: 33–46.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2010. ‘Trade-Offs between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36, no. 1: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnle, Stein. 1999. ‘Survival of the European Welfare State’. ARENA Working Papers Number 99/19.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 2015. ‘Høringsnotat – endringer i utlendingslovgivningen (innstramninger II) [Consultation brief – changes to the Immigration Act (Restrictions II)]’. At www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing–endringer-i-utlendingslovgivningen-innstramninger-ii/id2469054/, accessed 19 May 2018.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice and Public Security 2016. ‘Prop. 90 L (2015–2016) Endringer i utlendingsloven mv. (innstramninger II) [Immigration Bill Restrictions II]’. At www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/prop.-90-l-20152016/id2481758/, accessed 27 August 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice and Public Security 2017. ‘Høringsbrev – endringer i utlendingsforskriften – krav om selvforsørgelse for rett til permanent oppholdstillatelse [Consultation memorandum – changes to the Immigration Regulations – requirement of self-reliance for a right to permanent residence]’. At www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing–endringer-i-utlendingsforskriften–krav-om-selvforsorgelse-for-rett-til-permanent-oppholdstillatelse/id2545453/, accessed 19 May 2018.Google Scholar
Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority. 2019. ‘Minimum Wage’. At www.arbeidstilsynet.no/en/working-conditions/pay-and-minimum-rates-of-pay/minimum-wage/, accessed 26 April 2019.Google Scholar
NOU 2004:20. 2004. ‘Ny Utlendingslov [New Immigration Act]’. Norwegian Official Report 2004:20 Arbeidsdepartementet.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2006. ‘Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes’. NYUL Rev. 81: 148.Google Scholar
Sirriyeh, Ala. 2015. ‘“All You Need Is Love And\pounds 18,600”: Class and the New UK Family Migration Rules’. Critical Social Policy 35, no. 2: 228–247.Google Scholar
Staver, Anne. 2014. ‘From Right to Earned Privilege? The Development of Stricter Family Reunification Rules in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom’. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Staver, Anne 2015. ‘Hard Work for Love – The Economic Drift in Norwegian Family Immigration and Integration Policies’. Journal of Family Issues 36, no. 11: 1453–1471.Google Scholar
Sumption, Madeleine and Vargas-Silva., Carlos 2018. ‘Love Is Not All You Need: Income Requirement for Visa Sponsorship of Foreign Family Members’. Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy 2, no. 1: 62–76.Google Scholar
Tjelle, Irina. 2016. ‘UDI: Laveste asylankomster til Norge på 19 år’. NRK.no, July 5, Online edition. At www.nrk.no/norge/udi-laveste-asylankomster-til-norge-pa-19-ar-1.13027939, accessed 22 August 2018.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by