Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T16:00:50.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2021

Glenn Stockwell
Glenn Stockwell
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mobile Assisted Language Learning
Concepts, Contexts and Challenges
 , pp. 202 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdous, M., Camaera, M. M. & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95.Google Scholar
Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Abuhamdeh, S. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2012). Attentional involvement and intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 257–267.Google Scholar
ACTFL. (2013). Program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers (2013). Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL).Google Scholar
Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M. & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.Google Scholar
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V. & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412.Google Scholar
Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1987). Computer-assisted language learning. Prospects, 17(3), 417–429.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (abridged ed.). New York: Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Appel, C. & Mullen, T. (2002). A new tool for teachers and researchers involved in e-mail tandem language learning. ReCALL, 14(2), 195–208.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. M. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), Second language teacher education. (pp. 215–225). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Baker, F. B. & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Kurtines, W. M. & Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.Google Scholar
Barrette, C. (2001). Students’ preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19(1), 5–36.Google Scholar
Barson, J. & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back CALL: Technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 49–68). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2003). CALL: Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Beauvois, D. H. (1995). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464.Google Scholar
Beck, J., Czerniak, C. H. & Lumpe, A. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323–343.Google Scholar
Beeres-Scheenstra, R., Ohnsorg, C., Candreia, C., Heinzmann, S., Castellanos, S., de Min, N. & Linder, T. E. (2017). Single-center study investigating foreign language acquisition at school in children, adolescents, and young adults with uni- or bilateral cochlear implants in the Swiss German population. Otology & Neurotology, 38(6), 833–838.Google Scholar
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E. & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and research autonomy (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, P., Chappell, P. & Yates, L. (2018). A day in the life: Mapping international students’ language learning environments in multilingual Sydney. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
Benson, P. & Voller, P. (eds.). (2013). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, P. (2017). Beyond plain except or sheer resistance: A typology of university instructors’ attitudes to students’ media use in class. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 410–417.Google Scholar
Blaj-Ward, L. (2017). Language learning and use in English-medium higher education. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on Spanish L2 interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.Google Scholar
Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
Blin, F. (2016). Towards an “ecological” CALL theory: Theoretical perspectives and their instantiation in CALL research and practice. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 39–54). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (1954). The thought processes of students in discussion. In French, S. J. (ed.), Accent on teaching: Experiments in general education (pp. 23–46). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Blyth, A. (2015). Social media ethics in English language teaching. The JALT CALL Journal, 11(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
Bodsworth, H. & Goodyear, V. A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to using digital technologies in the Cooperative Learning model in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(6), 563–579.Google Scholar
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Boonbrahm, S., Kaewrat, C. & Boonbrahm, P. (2015). Using augmented reality technology in assisting English learning for primary school students. In Zaphiris, P. & Ioannou, A. (eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. LCT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9192. (pp. 24–32). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A. & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six‐campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.Google Scholar
Bower, M. & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers & Education, 88, 343–353.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., Lindström, N. B. & Hashemi, S. S. (2017). Integration and language learning of newly arrived migrants using mobile technology. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2017(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brand, M. (2017). Theoretical models of the development and maintenance of Internet addiction. In Montag, C. & Reuter, M. (eds.), Internet addiction: Neuroscientific approaches and therapeutical implications including smartphone addition (2nd ed.) (pp. 19–34). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Brantley-Dias, L. & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct “just right”? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128.Google Scholar
Breakwell, G. M. & Rose, D. (2006). Theory, method and research design. In Breakwell, G. M., G., Hammond, S. M, Fife-Schaw, C. & Smith, J. A. (eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 2–23). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Brown, A. & Green, T. (2003). Showing up to class in pajamas (or less!): The fantasies and realities of on-line professional development courses for teachers. The Clearing House, 76(3), 148–151.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
Browne, C. & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
Buckingham, D. (2007). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burden, K. & Kearney, M. (2018). Designing an educator toolkit for the mobile learning age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(2), 88–99.Google Scholar
Burnell, K. & Kuther, T. L. (2016). Predictors of mobile phone and social networking site dependency in adulthood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(10), 621–627.Google Scholar
Burns, T. R. & deVillé, P. (2007). Dynamic systems theory. In Bryant, C. D. & Peck, D. L. (eds.), Handbook of 21st century sociology (pp. 569–582). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Burston, J. (2003). Proving it works. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 219–226.Google Scholar
Burston, J. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–255.Google Scholar
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.Google Scholar
Busse, V. & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 435–456.Google Scholar
Çakmak, F. & Erçetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24–47.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Callon, M., Law, J. & Rip, A. (eds.), Mapping of the dynamics of science and technology (pp. 19–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Canals, L. & Al-Rawashdeh, A. (2019). Teacher training and teachers’ attitudes towards educational technology in the deployment of online English language courses in Jordan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 639–664.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
Carr, N. (2011). What the internet is doing to our brains: The shallows. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Casper, M. (1994). Reframing and grounding nonhuman agency: What makes a fetus an agent? American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 839–856.Google Scholar
Castells, M., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Qiu, J. L. & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cavus, C. & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Deville, C. (1999). Computer adaptive testing in second language contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 273–299.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1989). Using intelligent computer-assisted language learning. Computers and the Humanities, 23(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-H., Liu, G.-Z. & Hwang, G.-J. (2015). Interaction between gaming and multistage guiding strategies on students’ field trip mobile learning performance and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1032–1050.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-M. & Chung, C.-J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-M. & Li, Y.-L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, (4), 341–364.Google Scholar
Chen, I.-J. & Chang, C.-C. (2011). Content presentation modes in mobile language listening tasks: English proficiency as a moderator. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 451–470.Google Scholar
Chen, X.-B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Carger, C. L. & Smith, T. J. (2017). Mobile-assisted narrative writing practice for young English language learners from a funds of knowledge approach. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 28–41.Google Scholar
Cheng, S., Hwang, W.-Y., Wu, S., Shadiev, R. & Xie, C. (2010). A mobile device and online system with contextual familiarity and its effects on English learning on campus. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 93–109.Google Scholar
Chik, A. (2020). Humorous interaction, language learning, and social media. World Englishes, 39, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12443.Google Scholar
Chik, A. & Breidbach, S. (2014). “Facebook me” within a global community of learners of English: Technologizing learner autonomy. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 100–118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Chun, D., Kern, R. & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning, The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80.Google Scholar
Churchill, D. (2013). Conceptual model design and learning uses. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
Churchill, D., Fox, B. & King, M. (2016). Framework for designing mobile learning environments. In Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chu, T. K. F. & Fox, B. (eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 3–26). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. A. (2005). CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL, 17(1), 18–31.Google Scholar
Collot, M. & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In Herring, S. (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 12–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2006). Toward an ontological approach in goal-oriented language courseware design and its implications for technology-independent content structuring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2–3), 109–127.Google Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2010). Elicitation of learners’ personal goals as design concepts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 259–274.Google Scholar
Conole, G. & Paredes, P .P. (2018). An analysis of adult language learning in informal settings and the role of mobile learning. In Yu, S., Ally, M. & Tsinakos, A. (eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education (pp. 45–57). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching (5th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coombe, C. & Davidson, P. (2015). Constructing questionnaires. In Brown, J. D. & Coombe, C. (eds.), Research in language teaching and learning (pp. 217–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Introduction: Multiliteracies; The beginnings of an idea. In Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3–8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cortese, C. G. (2005). Learning through teaching. Management Learning, 36(1), 87–115.Google Scholar
Cortese, C., Pupovac, S. & Xu, L. (2019). Applying open-book-open-web assessment in postgraduate accounting subject: Flipping test. In Zhang, Y. A. & Cristol, D. (eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning (2nd ed) (pp. 93–108). Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Berge, Z. L. & Muilenberg, L. Y. (eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Florence, KY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crompton, H. (2016). The theory of context-aware ubiquitous learning and the affordances of this approach for geometry learners. In Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chu, T. K. F. & Fox, B. (eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 303–314). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (2018). Introduction. In Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning and higher education: Challenges in context (pp. 1–7). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890–1990. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. & Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 425–439.Google Scholar
Cui, Y. & Bull, S. (2005). Context and learner modelling for the mobile foreign language learner. System, 33(2), 353–367.Google Scholar
Cummings, J., Sturm, M. & Avram, A. (2020). Language teaching and settlement for newcomers in the digital age. Migration and Language Education, 1(1). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.29140/ile.v1n1.261.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1998). e-Lective language learning: Design of a computer-assisted text-based ESL/EFL learning system. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 18–21.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. A. & Park, S. (2003). Review of Internet audio communication for second language learning: A comparative review of six programs. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
Darrach, B. (1970). Meet Shaky, the first electronic person. LIFE Magazine, 69(21), 58B–68B.Google Scholar
Dashti, F. A. & Aldashti, A. A. (2015). EFL college students’ attitudes towards mobile learning. International Education Studies, 8(8), 13–20.Google Scholar
Davazdahemami, B., Hammer, B. & Soror, A. (2016). Addiction to mobile phone or addiction through mobile phone? In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). (pp. 1467–1476). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar
Davies, A. & Elder, C. (eds.). (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners' attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: The role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733710.Google Scholar
de la Guía, E., Lopez Camacho, V., Orozco-Barbosa, L., Brea Luján, V. M., Penichet, V. M. R. & Lozano Pérez, M. (2016). Introducing IoT and wearable technologies into task-based language learning for young children. IEEE Transitions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 366–378.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Moller, A. C. (2007). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In Dweck, C. S. & Elliot, A. J. (eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 579–592). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (eds.). (2009). Handbook of self-determination. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Delcker, J., Honal, A. & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Mobile device usage in higher education. In Sampson, D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. M. & Isaías, P. (eds.), Digital technologies: Sustainable innovations for improving teaching and learning (pp. 45–56). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Demouy, V., Jones, A., Kan, Q., Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Eardley, A. (2016). Why and how do distance learners use mobile devices for language learning? The EuroCALL Review, 24(1), 10–24.Google Scholar
Dewan, P. (2019). Reading in the age of continuous partial attention: Retail-inspired ideas for academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(3), 177–187.Google Scholar
Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Dikkers, S. M. (2014) The future of mobile media for learning. In Miller, C. & Doering, A. (eds.), The new landscape of mobile learning: Redesigning education in an app-based world (pp. 103–119). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching & learning motivation. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dörynei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Conceptualizing learner characteristics in a complex, dynamic world. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity theory and language: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 79–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Kubanyiova, M. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D. & Henry, A. (eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C. & Henry, A. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused intervention. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C. & Ibrahim, Z. (2014). Energising language learning by creating intense emotional pathways. In Lasagabaster, D., Doiz, A. & Sierra, J. M. (eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 9–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching & learning motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (1987). Relating second-language theory to CALL research and application. In Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (pp. 133–167). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embedded interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ducate, L. & Lomicka, L. (2013). Going mobile: Language learning with an iPod Touch in intermediate French and German classes. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 445–468.Google Scholar
Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2012). Second language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 564–586). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duman, G., Orhon, G. & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
Dunkel, P. A. (1987). Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted language learning CALL): Past dilemmas and future prospects for audible CALL. The Modern Language Journal, 71(3), 250–260.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2017, March 3). People are holding onto their smartphones longer. Business Insider. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/how-long-people-wait-to-upgrade-phones-chart-2017-3.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2005). Conducting research on CALL. In Egbert, J. & Petrie, G. M. (eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 3–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eilertsen, T. V. & Valdermo, O. (2000). Open-book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 91–103.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1990). Researching classroom language learning. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom (pp. 54–70). London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research & language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N. & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
El Shaban, A. & Egbert, J. (2018). Diffusing education technology: A model for language teacher professional development in CALL. System, 78, 234–244.Google Scholar
Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5). Retrieved from www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/ertmer.html.Google Scholar
Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.Google Scholar
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E. & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423–435.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454–459.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.Google Scholar
Fageeh, A. I. (2015). EFL student and faculty perceptions of and attitudes towards online testing in the medium of Blackboard: Promises and challenges. The JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 41–62.Google Scholar
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
Farazmand, A. (2016). Studying crisis and emergency management using global cases of best and worst practices. In Farazmand, A. (ed.), Global cases in best and worst practice in crisis and emergency management (pp. 1–15). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fazzi, F. & Lasagabaster, D. (2020). Learning beyond the classroom: Students’ attitudes towards the integration of CLIL and museum-based pedagogies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1714630.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2005). What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17(2), 269–288.Google Scholar
Fellner, T. & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
Feng, Y. & Webb, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening and viewing: Which mode of input is the most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000494.Google Scholar
Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System, 38(2), 272–279.Google Scholar
Fife-Schaw, C. (2006). Questionnaire design. In Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, G. S. M., Fife-Schaw, C. & Smith, J. A. (eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 210–231). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2012). Diversity in learner usage patterns. In Stockwell, G. (ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 14–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, L., Evans, M. J. & Esch, E. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural understanding at secondary level. Language Learning Journal, 30(1), 50–58.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, D., Hattie, J. & Hughes, P. (1985). Computer applications in Australian classrooms. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Retrieved October 3, 2017 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314020.pdf.Google Scholar
Flanigan, A. & Kiewra, K. (2018). What college instructors can do about cyber-slacking. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 585–597.Google Scholar
Følstad, A. & Taylor, C. (2020). Conversational repair in chatbots for customer service: The effect of expressing uncertainty and suggesting alternatives. In Følstad, A., Araujo, R., Papadopoulos, S., Law, E. L.-C., Granmo, O. C., Luger, E. & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (eds.). Chatbot Research and Design Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 19–20, 2019, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 201–214). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Fornara, F. & Lomicka, L. (2019). Using visual social media in language learning to investigage the role of social presence. CALICO Journal, 36(3), 184–203.Google Scholar
Freeth, M., Foulsham, T. & Kingstone, A. (2013) What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS ONE 8(1), e53286. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053286.Google Scholar
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers and Education, 50, 906–914.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. A. (2008). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 180–200). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. L. (2006, July 5). The age of interruption. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/opinion/05friedman.html.Google Scholar
Friðriksdóttir, K. (2018). The impact of different modalities on student retention and overall engagement patterns in open online courses, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 53–71.Google Scholar
Fryer, L. K. & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language, Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14.Google Scholar
Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K. & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279–289.Google Scholar
Gabe, G. (2019, July 2). Google’s core algorithm updates and the power of user studies: How real feedback from real people can help site owners surface website quality problems (and more). G-Squared Interactive. Retrieved from www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/google-core-ranking-updates-user-studies/.Google Scholar
Galletly, J. E., Butcher, C. W. & Lim How, J. (1989). In Cameron, K. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning: Program structure and principles (pp. 81–100). Oxford: Intellect Limited.Google Scholar
Galluch, P. S., Long, C., Bratton, T., Gee, M. & Groeber, M. (2009). Losing the battle: Student and instructor perspectives on attention loss in the classroom. In Rogers, C. F. (ed.), Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (pp. 45–50). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Galperin, H. (2016). How to connect to the other half: Evidence and policy insights from household surveys in South America (ed.), The shifting geopolitics of Internet access: From broadband and Net neutrality to zero-rating (pp. 5–36). London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Gan, J. & Zhong, L. (2016). Empirical research on the influencing factors of mobile foreign language learning based on UTAUT model. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(10), 7526–7532.Google Scholar
García, O. & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
García Botero, G., Botero Restrepo, M. A., Chang, Z. & Questier, F. (2019): Complementing in-class language learning with voluntary out-of-class MALL: Does training in self-regulation and scaffolding make a difference? Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650780.Google Scholar
García-Peñalvo, F. J. & Alier Forment, M. (2014). Learning management system: Evolving from silos to structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 143–145.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. In Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. (eds.), Attitudes and motivation in second language learning (pp. 119–216). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. B. & Baquedano-López, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339–361.Google Scholar
Garrison, D. & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gartner. (2016). Gartner hype cycle. Retrieved from www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2009). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gaved, M., Jones, A., Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Scanlon, E. (2012). A citizen-centred approach to education in the smart city: Incidental language learning for supporting the inclusion of recent migrants. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(4), 50–64.Google Scholar
George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ghorbani, N. & Ebadi, S. (2019). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning, Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1704599.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception (Classic Edition). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gillwald, A. (2017). Beyond access: Addressing digital inequality in Africa. In Centre for International Governance (ed.), The shifting geopolitics of Internet access: From broadband and Net neutrality to zero-rating (pp. 37–54). London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Glover, I. & Rodger, H. (2018). The death of “mobile learning.” In Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning and higher education: Challenges in context (pp. 82–91). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). From memory palaces to spacing algorithms: Approaches to second-language vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 4–11.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8–27.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (2010). Review article: Shallow draughts; Larsen-Freeman and Cameron on complexity. Second Language Research, 26(4), 549–560.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J., Cardoso, W. & Collins, L. (2017). Teacher perspectives on the integration of mobile-assisted language learning. In Borthwick, K., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL in a climate of change: Adapting to turbulent global conditions; Short papers from EuroCALL 2017 (pp. 135–139). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.702.Google Scholar
Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gromik, N. A. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230.Google Scholar
GSMA Intelligence. (2019). Definitive data and analysis for the mobile industry. Retrieved from www.gsmaintelligence.com/.Google Scholar
Gu, J. (2016). Understanding self-directed learning in the context of mobile Web 2.0: Case study with workplace learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 306–316.Google Scholar
Gu, X., Gu, F. & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204–215.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N., Palalas, A., Berezin, N., Legere, C., Kramer, G. & Amo-Kwao, G. (2016). Negotiating cultural spaces in an international mobile and blended learning project. In Dyson, L. E., Ng, W. & Fergusson, J. (eds.), Mobile learning futures: Sustaining quality research and practice in mobile learning (pp. 83–94). Sydney: The University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D. & Barr, R. (eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 3, pp. 403–322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86.Google Scholar
Halmdienst, N., Radhuber, M. & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2019). Attitudes of elderly Austrians towards new technologies: Communication and entertainment versus health and support use. European Journal of Ageing, 16, 513–523.Google Scholar
Han, Y. J. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for EFL autonomy. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 98–102.Google Scholar
Hanna, D. E., Brown, G., Dede, C., Olcott, D., Poley, J., Schmidt, K. & Tallman, J. (2000). Higher education in an era of digital competition: Choices and challenges. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hanson, B. G. (1995). General systems theory: Beginning with wholes. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital literacies in teacher preparation. In Thorne, S. & May, S. (eds.), Language, education and technology, Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.) (pp. 275–288). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Heift, T. & Caws, C. (2014). Constructing a data-driven learning tool with recycled learning data. Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 76–89.Google Scholar
Heijne-Penninga, M., Kuks, J. B. M., Schonrock-Adema, J., Snijders, T. A. B. & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2008). Open-book tests to complement assessment-programmes: Analysis of open and closed-book tests. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 263–273.Google Scholar
Heo, H., Lim, K. Y. & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. & Johns, T. (1984). Computers in language learning. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Hiver, P. & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. (1994). Powerful, personal: Electronic mail and the L2 writing process. ReCALL, 6(2), 53–62.Google Scholar
Hohenberger, A. & Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2009). Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics, 47(2), 481–511.Google Scholar
Hois, J., Theofanou-Fuelbier, D. & Junk, A. J. (2019). How to achieve explainability and transparency in human AI interaction. In Stephanidis, C. (ed.), HCI International 2019 – Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1033 (pp. 177–183). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Holden, C. & Sykes, J. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1981). Foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2003). Social autonomy: Addressing the dangers of culturism in TESOL. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 110–128). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K.-H. & Lin, P.-H. (2019). The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest on flow experience reflecting performance progress in a Chinese remote association game. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614068.Google Scholar
Hong, J. S., Han, D. H., Kim, Y. I., Bae, S. J., Kim, S. M. & Renshaw, P. (2017). English language education on-line game and brain connectivity. ReCALL, 29(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Hsieh, W.-M. & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Taiwanese high school teachers’ conceptions of mobile learning. Computers & Education, 115, 82–95.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J. & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336.Google Scholar
Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–213.Google Scholar
Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287–1297.Google Scholar
Hu, Z. & McGrath, I. (2011). Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 41–59.Google Scholar
Huang, C. S. J., Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, T. H. C. & Su, A. Y. S. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263–276.Google Scholar
Huang, L.-L. & Lin, C.-C. (2011). EFL learners’ reading on mobile phones. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C. & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In Fotos, S. & Browne, C. (eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 351–368.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2008). Twenty-five years of theory in the CALICO Journal. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 387–399.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2009). Developing CALL theory: A new frontier. In Thomas, M. (ed.). New frontiers in CALL: Negotiating diversity (pp. 1–6). Nagoya: JALT CALL SIG.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.163-178.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2020). Levering technology to integrate informal language learning within classroom settings. In Dressman, M. & Sadler, R. W. (eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 405–419). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2006). The scope of CALL education. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 2–20). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 24–38). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hui, C. H. & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. & Teasley, S. D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L. & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
Hwang, G. J. & Wu, P.-H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95.Google Scholar
Hwang, W.-Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z.-H., Shadiev, R. & Chen, S.-Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657.Google Scholar
Im, I., Hong, S. & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption testing the UTAUT model. Information & Management, 48(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Imlah, W. G. & du Boulay, J. B. H. (1985). Robust natural language parsing in computer-assisted instruction. System, 13(2), 137–147.Google Scholar
Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R. & Karaca, F. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 350–356.Google Scholar
Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J. & Luokkanen., T. (2007). Structuring and Regulating Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79.Google Scholar
Jitpaisarnwattana, N., Reinders, H. & Darasawang, P. (2019). Language MOOCs: An expanding field. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 1(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
Karlström, P. & Lundin, E. (2013). CALL in the zone of proximal development: Novelty effects and teacher guidance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 412–429.Google Scholar
Kassem, M. A. M. (2018). The effect of a suggested in-service teacher training program based on mall applications on developing EFL students’ vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 250–260.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303–319.Google Scholar
Kawahara, H. (2010). Student authentication for course credit in distance learning. Journal of Multimedia Education Research, 7(1), S57–S63.Google Scholar
Kawahara, H., Nogimori, M., Matsumoto, S. (2015). Maximizing study hours with cloud-based and mobile-based e-learning. In Ally, M. & Khan, B. H. (eds.), International handbook of e-learning, Volume 2: Implementation and case studies (pp. 211–221). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kearney, M., Burke, P. F. & Schuck, S. (2019). The iPAC scale: A survey to measure distinctive mobile pedagogies. TechTrends, 63, 751–764.Google Scholar
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K. & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. & Smellie, D. (1994). Planning, producing, and using instructional technologies (7th ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Levy, M. (2008). L’italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners’ language learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitudes toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173–188.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language teacher education and technology. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 278–292). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Khamparia, A. & Pandey, B. (2020). Association of learning styles with different e-learning problems: A systematic review and classification. Education and Information Technology, 25, 1303–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10028-y.Google Scholar
Kiernan, P. J. & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task-based learning: Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D.-J. & Seo, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52–73.Google Scholar
Kim, G. (2017). Effects of mobile-assisted pre-listening activities and listening strategy training on EFL students’ listening comprehension skill and strategy use. Secondary English Education, 10(4), 47–70.Google Scholar
Kim, H. (2013). What to consider for effective mobile-assisted language learning: Design implications from an empirical analysis. In Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning: Proceedings of the WorldCALL 2013 Conference (pp. 138–140). Ulster, UK: University of Ulster. Retrieved from http://arts.ulster.ac.uk/worldcall2013/userfiles/file/shortpapers.pdf.Google Scholar
Kim, H. & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-S. (2011). Effects of SMS text messaging on vocabulary learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 159–180.Google Scholar
Kim, N.-Y. (2017). A study on different types of speech acts in voice-chat between EFL students and a chatbot. Studies in English Education, 22(3), 81–109.Google Scholar
Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligency chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46.Google Scholar
Kim, S.-K. & Lim, K. (2010). A case study on the effects of microblogging as a learning activity to enhance ESL students’ cultural knowledge and motivation to write in English. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 155–174.Google Scholar
Kitade, K. (2006). The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in task-based email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 319–348.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material and nonhuman agency: An introduction. In Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. ix–xix). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Koenraad, T. (2019). Pedagogical frameworks and principles for mobile (language) learning to support related teacher education. In Meunier, F., Van de Vyver, J., Bradley, L. & Thouesney, S. (eds.), CALL and complexity: Short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 229–235). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1014.Google Scholar
Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H. & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169–187.Google Scholar
Koole, M. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In Ally, M. (ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education & training (pp. 25–47). Athabasca: AU Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2002). Introduction. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 1–30). London: Continnum.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. & Pachler, N. (2007). Thinking about the “m” in m-learning. In Pachler, N. (ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 7–32). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Krug, S. (2014). Don’t make me think revisited: A common sense approach to web and mobile usability (3rd ed.). San Francisco: New Riders.Google Scholar
Kuhn, G., Teszka, R., Tenaw, N. & Kingstone, A. (2016). Don’t be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention. Cognition, 146, 136–142.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701–3709). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal learning through mobile devices. In Wong, L.-H. & Specht, M. (eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281–294). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2016). Personalization of language learning through mobile technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Gaved, M., Paletta, L., Scanlon, E., Jones, A. & Brasher, A. (2015). Mobile incidental learning to support the inclusion of recent immigrants. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 7(2), 9–21.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Lee, H. (2020). Mobile collaboration for language learning and cultural learning. In Dressman, M. & Sadler, R. W. (eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 169–180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H. & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution: Implications for language pedagogy. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 217–233). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile teaching and learning. In Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 25–44). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218.Google Scholar
Kurek, M. & Hauck, M. (2014). Closing the digital divide: A framework for multiliteracy training. In Pettes Guikema, J. & Williams, L. (eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice (pp. 119–140). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277–290.Google Scholar
Lai, C. (2019). Technology and learner autonomy: An argument in favour of the nexus between formal and informal learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 52–58.Google Scholar
Lai, C. & Morrison, B. (2013). Towards an agenda for learner preparation in technology-enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 154–162.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Shum, M. & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Wang, Q., Li, X. & Hu, X. (2016). The influence of individual espoused cultural values on self-directed use of technology for language learning beyond the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 676–688.Google Scholar
Lai, C. & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30(3), 299–318.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50(3), 301–346.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 78, 418–420.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108–124.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 46(4), 713–749.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten “lessons” from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D. & Henry, A. (eds.), Motivation dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity theory and language: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lauricella, S. & Kay, R. H. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The laptop effectiveness scale (LES). Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: Framing research questions. In Pachler, N. (ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–176). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1995). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity: Social ordering and social theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. (2014). The role of teachers and their beliefs in implementing technology-mediated language learning: Implications for teacher development and research. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 59–75.Google Scholar
Leakey, J. (2011). Evaluating computer-assisted language learning: An integrated approach to effectiveness research in CALL. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lee, H., Hampel, R. & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2019). Gesture in speaking tasks beyond the classroom: An exploration of the multimodal negotiation of meaning via Skype videoconferencing on mobile devices. System, 81, 26–38.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Lo, Y.-H.G. & Chin, T.-C. (2019). Practicing multiliteracies to enhance EFL learners’ meaning making process and language development: A multimodal problem-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614959.Google Scholar
Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.Google Scholar
Leis, A. (2014). Encouraging autonomy through the use of a social networking system. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
Lejonberg, E., Elstad, E. & Christophersen, K. A. (2018). Teaching evaluation: Antecedents of teachers’ perceived usefulness of follow-up sessions and perceived stress related to the evaluation process. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 281–296.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A. & Kallinkos, J. (eds.), Materiality and organising: Social interaction in a technical world (pp. 25–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leung, C. & Scarino, A. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of goals and outcomes in language/s education. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (S1), 81–95.Google Scholar
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14(1), 58–84.Google Scholar
Levy, M. & Hubbard, P. (2005). Why call CALL CALL? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 143–149.Google Scholar
Levy, M. & Steel, C. (2015). Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(2), 177–196.Google Scholar
Levy, M. & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. (2014). Exploring the social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 3–11). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Li, J. (2018). Digital affordances on WeChat: Learning Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 27–52.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Li, Z. & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 135–156.Google Scholar
Liaw, S.-S., Hatela, M. & Huang, H.-M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48–59.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-C., Lin, V., Liu, G.-Z., Kou, X., Kulikova, A. & Lin, W. (2019). Mobile-assisted reading development: A review from the Activity Theory perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1594919.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-C. & Yu, Y.-C. (2017). Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 528–542.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-J. & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. O., Olofsson, A. D. & Fransson, G. (2016). Contrasting views: Student and teacher perceptions on ICT in education. The proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education 2016 (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar
Lisenbee, P. S. (2016). Generation gap between students’ needs and teachers’ use of technology in classrooms. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 17(3), 99–123.Google Scholar
Little, D., Dam, L. & Legenhausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Lin, C.-S. & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Navarrete, C. C. & Wivagg, J. (2014). Powering up: Insights from distinguished mobile and ubiquitous learning projects across the world. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 115–126.Google Scholar
Liu, P.-H. E. & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1–E4.Google Scholar
Liu, P.-L. & Chen, C.-J. (2015). Learning English through actions: A study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 158–171.Google Scholar
Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.Google Scholar
Liu, T.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515–527.Google Scholar
Liu, T.-Y. & Chu, Y. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630–643.Google Scholar
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H. & Chu, Y. L. (2010). QR code and augmented reality-supported mobile English learning system. In Jiang, X., Ma, M. Y. & Chen, C. W. (eds.), Mobile multimedia processing. WMMP 2008. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 37–52). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Gu, X. (2019). Media multitasking, attention, and comprehension: A deep investigation into fragmented reading. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 67–87.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R. & Kim, K. M. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 379, 259–278.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1972, December). Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? Paper presented at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, December 29, 1972, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://eaps4.mit.edu/research/Lorenz/Butterfly_1972.pdf.Google Scholar
Lotherington, H. & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246.Google Scholar
Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525.Google Scholar
Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyddon, P. A. (2016). Mobile-assisted language learning and language learning autonomy. In Papadima-Sophocleous, S., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL communities and culture: Short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 302–306). Research-publishing.net https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.579.Google Scholar
Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovak, P., Binns, R., Slack, A., Inzlicht, M., Van Kleek, M. & Shadbolt, N. (2019). Self-control in cyberspace: Applying dual systems theory to a review of digital self-control tools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19) (pp. 1–18). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300361.Google Scholar
MacKay, J. (2019, March 21). Screen time stats 2019: Here’s how much you use your phone during the workday. Rescuetime:blog. Retrieved from https://blog.rescuetime.com/screen-time-stats-2018/.Google Scholar
Maier, J. R. A. & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 13–27.Google Scholar
Marín Juarros, V., Salinas Ibáñez, J. & de Benito Crosetti, B. (2014). Research results of two personal learning environments experiments in a higher education institution. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 205–220.Google Scholar
Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001 (89), 25–34.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 135–145.Google Scholar
Martín-Monje, E. & Bárcena, E. (eds.). (2014). Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, B. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase 2: Student classroom use of digital devices the non-class related purposes. Faculty publications, College of journalism and miscommunication, 90. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/90.Google Scholar
McGroarty, M. (2001). Situating second language motivation. In Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23) (pp. 69–91). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar
McPherson, M. S. & Bacow, L. S. (2015). Online higher education: Beyond the hype cycle. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 135–154.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39, 427–436.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mideros, D. & Carter, B. (2014). Meeting the autonomy challenge in an advanced Spanish listening class. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 60–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mills, K. A. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, special, material and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese students. The JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E. & James, T. (2002). Preservice teachers’ educational beliefs and their perception of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127.Google Scholar
Miralpeix, I. & Muñoz, C. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Milman, N. B. (2020, March 30). This is emergency remote teaching, not just online teaching. Education Week. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2020/03/30/this-is-emergency-remote-teaching-not-just.html.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. & Newman, M. (2002). Complex systems theory and evolution. In Pagel, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of evolution (pp. 1–5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F. & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moghari, M. H. & Marandi, S. S. (2017). Triumph through texting: Restoring learners’ interest in grammar. ReCALL, 29(3), 357–372.Google Scholar
Mok, C. H. (2012). Facebook and learning: Students’ perspectives on a course. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2(3), 131–143.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1981). Principles of communicative methodology. In Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (eds.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 59–66). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. (2014). Autonomy, social interaction, and community: A distant language learning perspective. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 119–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murray, G. (2014). Exploring the social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nah, K. C., White, P. & Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using a mobile phone to access the Internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. ReCALL, 20(3), 331–347.Google Scholar
Nakata, T. (2017). Does repeated practice make perfect? The effects of within-session repeated retrieval on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 653–679.Google Scholar
Neuman, W. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S. & Boyle, M. (2006). Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 13(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Newell, L. A. (2017). Reclaiming attention in the digital generation Negotiator (December 15, 2017). In Honeyman, C. & Schneider, A. K. (eds.), The negotiator’s desk reference (pp. 201–214). Washington, DC: DRI Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765470.Google Scholar
Ng, W. & Nicholas, H. (2013). A framework for sustainable mobile learning in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 695–715.Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. & Pham, V. (2011). Learner open modeling in adaptive mobile learning system for supporting student to learn English. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 5(4), 22–29.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.Google Scholar
Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2005). Defining and measuring SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717–761). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Bryan, A. (2008). Providing pedagogical learner training in CALL: Impact on student use of language-learning strategies and glosses. CALICO Journal 26(1), 142–159.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, F. V., Neumann, D. L., Jones, L. & Creed, P. A. (2017). The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues. Education & Information Technologies, 22(1), 399–415.Google Scholar
O’Flaherty, J. & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet & Higher Education, 25, 85–95.Google Scholar
Ophir, E., Nass, C. & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1433–1448.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. (2013). An autoethnographic study of the use of mobile devices to support foreign language vocabulary learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4(4), 295–307.Google Scholar
Ozdamli, F. & Yildiz, E. P. (2017). Opinions and expectations of parents on integrations of mobile technologies to education and school family cooperation. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(4), 136–148.Google Scholar
Pachler, N., Bachmair, B. & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Palalas, A. & Hoven, D. (2013). Implications of using DBR to investigate the iterative design of a mobile-enabled language learning system. In Rodrigues, J. & Pardo-Ballester, C. (eds.), Design-based research in CALL. (pp. 41–66). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Palardy, J. M. (1988). The effect of homework policies on student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 72(507), 14–17.Google Scholar
Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palomo-Duarte, M., Berns, A., Cejas, A., Dodero, J. M., Caballero, J. A. & Ruiz-Rube, I. (2016). Assessing foreign language learning through mobile game-based learning environments. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 7(2), 53–67.Google Scholar
Paramskas, D. M. (1986). Artificial intelligence in computer-assisted language instruction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 42(3), 619.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pegrum. (2016). Future directions in mobile learning. In Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chu, T. K. F. & Fox, B. (eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 303–314). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2019). Mobile lenses on learning: Language and literacies on the move. Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M., Dudeney, G. & Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies revisited. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 3–24.Google Scholar
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163–178.Google Scholar
Peppard, H. (1989). Language learning with the laser. Journal of Reading, 32(7), 628–633.Google Scholar
Petersen, S. A., Divitini, M. & Chabert, G. (2008). Identity, sense of community and connectedness in a community of mobile learners. ReCALL, 20(3), 361–379.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. (2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL, 24(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
Philp, J. & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, participation, and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System, 19, 437–452.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12–24.Google Scholar
Polio, C. & Friedman, D. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porte, G. & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (2012). Digital media and learner identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.Google Scholar
Price, P. C. (2012). Research methods in psychology: Core concepts and skills. Boston: Flat World Knowledge, Inc.Google Scholar
Rampazzo, L. & Aranha, S. (2019). Telecollaboration and genres: A new perspective to understand language learning. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 2, 7–28.Google Scholar
Rao, S. K. & Prasad, R. (2018). Impact of 5G technologies on Industry 4.0. Wireless Personal Communication, 100, 145–159.Google Scholar
Rashid, S., Cunningham, U., Watson, K. & Howard, J. (2018). Revisiting the digital divide (s): Technology-enhanced English language practices at a university in Pakistan. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 64–87.Google Scholar
Rechtschaffen, D. (2014). The way of mindful education: Cultivating well-being in teachers and students. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 382–407.Google Scholar
Reinders, H. & Cho, M.-Y. (2010). Extensive listening practice and input enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. TESL-EJ, 14(2). Retrieved from www.tesl-ej.org.Google Scholar
Reinders, H. & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In Harwood, N. (ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 58–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rezaee, A. A., Alavi, S. M. & Razzaghifard, P. (2019). The impact of mobile-based dynamic assessment on improving EFL oral accuracy. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3091–3105.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33–49.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2016). Exploring the potential of a location based augmented reality game for language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 16(3), 34–49.Google Scholar
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richmond, S. (2012, August 12). Smartphones hardly used for calls. The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk.Google Scholar
Rivers, D. J. (2009). Utilizing the quick response (QR) code within a Japanese EFL environment. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 15–28.Google Scholar
Robb, T. (2006). Helping teachers to help themselves. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 335–347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A., Yaya, L. H. P. & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 283–331.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J. C. (2017). Design-based research. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 364–377). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rogers-Estable, M. (2014). Web 2.0 use in higher education. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(2), 130–142.Google Scholar
Romeo, K. & Hubbard, P. (2010). Pervasive CALL learner training for improving listening proficiency. In Levy, M., Blin, F., Siskin, C. & Takeuchi, O. (eds.), WorldCALL: International perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 215–229). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods: In search of a podcasting “podagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 471–492.Google Scholar
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2017). State of the app: A taxonomy and framework for evaluating language learning mobile applications. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 243–258.Google Scholar
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: A user evaluation of the Busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854–881.Google Scholar
Rosell-Aguilar, F. & Kan, Q. (2015). Design and user evaluation of a mobile application to teach Chinese characters. The JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 19–40.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. & Mercer, S. (2012). Implicit theories: Language learning mindsets. In Mercer, S., Ryan, S. & Williams, M. (eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 74–89). Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.Google Scholar
Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., Maris, M. & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334–1347.Google Scholar
Santos, O. C., Saneiro, M., Boticario, J. G. & Rodriguez-Sanchez, M. C. (2016). Toward interactive context-aware affective educational recommendations in computer-assisted language learning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 22(1–2), 27–57.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. & Ochs, E. (eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, M. J. (1995). A handbook of instructional and training program design. Available from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED383281.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1999). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2009). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, E., Cohen-Chen, S., Hirsch-Hoefler, S. & Halperin, E. (2016). Explaining normative versus nonnormative action: The role of implicit theories. Political Psychology, 37(6), 835–852.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (2015). Foreword. In Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. & Henry, A. (eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. xv–ixx). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Neither here nor there? Learner autonomy and intercultural factors in CALL environments. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 164–182). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Learner autonomy and CALL environments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seker, S. (2020). Fuzzy quality function deployment method for smart phone product design. In Kahraman, C. & Cebi, S. (eds)., Customer oriented product design: Intelligent and fuzzy techniques (pp. 57–72). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5–11.Google Scholar
Sharples, M. (2014). Seamless learning despite context. In Wong, L.-H., Specht, M. & Milrad, M. (eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 41–55). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Sharples, M., Delgado Kloos, C., Dimitriadis, Y., Garlatti, S. & Specht, M. (2015). Mobile and accessible learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Sharples, M., Taylor, J. & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In Andrews, R. & Haythornthwaite, C. (eds.), The Sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shelly, G., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, G. A. & Gunter, R. E. (2006). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom (4th ed.). Boston: Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103–110.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (ed.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sixsmith, C. & Simco, N. (1997). The role of formal and informal theory in the training of student teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 5(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
Slater, M. D. (2017). Crisis management by higher education leaders. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edgewood College, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Smith, R. C. (2003). Pedagogy for autonomy as (becoming-)appropriate methodology. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.). Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 129–146). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sockett, G. & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138–151.Google Scholar
Solak, E. & Cakır, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners’ vocabulary learning. The Journal of Educators Online, 13(2), 50–72.Google Scholar
Son, J.-B. (2018). Teacher development in technology-enhanced language teaching. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Son, J.-B., Park, S. & Park, M. (2017). Digital literacy of language learners in two different contexts. The JALT CALL Journal, 13(2), 77–96.Google Scholar
Son, J.-B. & Windeatt, S. (2017). Language teacher education and technology: Approaches and practices. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Sparrow, B., Liu, J. & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778.Google Scholar
Squire, K. (2009). Mobile media learning: Multiplicities of place. On the Horizon, 17(1), 70–80.Google Scholar
Statistica Research Department. (2018). Number of mobile phone users worldwide from 2015–2020. Statistica. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/.Google Scholar
Statistica Research Department. (2019). Share of individuals who accessed the internet on a mobile phone in Great Britain from 2010 to 2019, by age. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/320974/internet-usage-on-mobile-phones-gb-age/.Google Scholar
Statistica Research Department. (2020). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2020, ranked by number of active users. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2012). Fitting learning into life: Language students’ perspectives on benefits of using mobile apps. In Brown, M. & Stewart, T. (eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures (pp. 875–880). Wellington: ASCILITE.Google Scholar
Steel, C. & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2007. ReCALL, 25(3), 306–320.Google Scholar
Stickler, U. & Hampel, R. (2015). Transforming teaching: New skills for online language learning spaces. In Hampel, R. & Stickler, U. (eds.), Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices (pp. 63–77). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stickler, U., Hampel, R. & Emke, M. (2020). A developmental framework for online language teaching skills. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v3n1.271.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for language teaching skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), 105–120.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 253–270.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2009). Teacher education in CALL: Teaching teachers to educate themselves. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2012a). Diversity in research and practice. In Stockwell, G. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 147–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2012b). Introduction. In Stockwell, G. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 1–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2013a). Technology and motivation in English language teaching and learning. In Ushioda, E. (ed.), International perspectives in motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 156–175). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2013b). Tracking learner usage of mobile phones for language learning outside of the classroom. In Hubbard, P., Schultz, M. & Smith, B. (eds.), Human-computer interaction in language learning: Studies in honor of Robert Fischer. CALICO Monograph Series (pp. 118–136). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2014). Exploring theory in computer-assisted language learning. In Deng, X. & Seow, R. (eds.), Alternative pedagogies in the English language & communication classroom: Selected papers from the Fourth CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers (pp. 25–30). Singapore: Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2016). Mobile language learning. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), Routledge handbook of technology in second language learning (pp. 296–307. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2019). Insights from replication on the factors affecting task engagement in mobile-based learning activities. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 1(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Harrington, M. W. (2003). The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 337–359.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. TIRF Report, 2013, 1–14.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Hubbard, P. (2014). Learner training in mobile language learning. In Colpaert, J., Aerts, A. & Oberhofer, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 CALL Research Conference (pp. 320–322). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Hubbard, P. (2018, August). Competition as an enhancement to learner training in mobile language learning. Paper presented at the EuroCALL 2018 Conference, August 22–25, 2018, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary: An investigation in Japan and Taiwan. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 299–322.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Reinders, H. (2019). Technology, motivation and autonomy, and teacher psychology in language learning: Exploring the myths and possibilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 40–51.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Tanaka-Ellis, N. (2012). Diversity in environments. In Stockwell, G. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 71–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, C. & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and “teacher-presence”: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146–169.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2008). Material agency, skills and history: Distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 37–55). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. (2018). Digital games and language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 219–224.Google Scholar
Tabatabaei, O. & Goojani, A. (2012). The impact of text messaging on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Cross Cultural Communication, 8(2), 47–55.Google Scholar
Tai, Y. & Ting, Y.-L. (2011). Adoption of mobile technology for language learning: Teacher attitudes and challenges. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Tamez, R. (2016). Theoretical frameworks of performance-based models. Performance Improvement, 55(6), 19–24.Google Scholar
Tassone, A., Liu, J. J. W., Reed, M. J. & Vickers, K. (2017). Multitasking in the classroom: Testing an educational intervention as a method of reducing multitasking. Active Learning in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417740772.Google Scholar
Tay, H.-Y. (2016). Longitudinal study on impact of iPad use on teaching and learning. Cogent Learning, 3(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. V. & Sobel, D. (2015). Using introspective methods. In Brown, J. D. & Coombe, C. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 231–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tchudi, S. (1988). Invisible thinking and the hypertext. The English Journal, 77(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
Teske, K. (2017). Learning technology review: Duolingo. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 393–401.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2002). M-learning: Learning in transit. In Lewis, P. (ed.), The changing face of CALL: A Japanese perspective (pp. 229–243). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Thumlert, K., de Castell, S. & Jenson, J. (2015). Short cuts and extended techniques: Rethinking relations between technology and educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 786–803.Google Scholar
Tidwell, J., Brewer, C. & Valencia, A. (2020). Designing interfaces: Patterns for effective interaction design (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Toland, S. H., Rivers, D. J. & Kohyama, M. (2016). Enhancing Japanese university students’ English language presentation skills with mobile-video recordings. The JALT CALL Journal, 12(3), 179–201.Google Scholar
Tour, E. (2015). Digital mindsets: Teachers’ technology use in personal life and teaching. Language, Learning & Technology, 19(3), 124–139.Google Scholar
Toyoda, E. & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82–99.Google Scholar
Tran, P. (2016). Training learners to use Quizlet vocabulary activities on mobile phones in Vietnam with Facebook. The JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
Tran, P. (2018). Enhancing online language learning task engagement through social interaction. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 88–101.Google Scholar
Tran, P. (2019). The role of teacher presence through online social interaction for promoting task engagement outside of class. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Travers, C. J., Morisano, D. & Locke, E. A. (2015). Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 224–241.Google Scholar
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ… International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Traxler, J. (2011). The mobile and mobility: Information, organisations and systems. In. Pokorny, J., Repa, V., Richta, K., Wojtkowski, W., Linger, H., Barry, C. & Lang, M. (eds.), Information systems development: Modeling and development (pp. 25–34). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Traxler, J. & Vosloo, S. (2014). Introduction: The prospects for mobile learning. Prospect, 44, 13–28.Google Scholar
Trinder, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and systems. In Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 7–24). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual usage? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.Google Scholar
Tseng, W.-T. (2016). Measuring English vocabulary size via computerized adaptive testing. Computers & Education, 97, 69–85.Google Scholar
Udell, C. (2015). The importance of curation for successful mobile experiences. In Udell, C. & Woodill, G. (eds.), Mastering mobile learning: Tips and techniques for success (pp. 205–208). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (1998). Effective motivational thinking: A cognitive theoretical approach to the study of language learning motivation. In Alcon, E. & Codina, V. (eds.), Current issues in English language methodology (pp. 77–90). Castelló de la Plana: Jaume I University Press.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199–210.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S. E. (2008). Agency, networks, past and future. In Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 217–247). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
van der Linden, E. (1993). Does feedback enhance computer-assisted language learning? Computers & Education, 21(1–2), 61–65.Google Scholar
VanDerLinden, K. (2014). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 165, 75–85.Google Scholar
Vanijdee, A. (2003). Thai distance English learners and learner autonomy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18(1), 75–84.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 140–164). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Van Osch, W. & Mendelson, O. (2011). A typology of affordances: Untangling sociomaterial interactions through video analysis. CIS 2011 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/visualmedia/1.Google Scholar
Van Praag, B. & Sanchez, H. S. (2015). Mobile technology in second language classrooms: Insights into its uses, pedagogical implications, and teacher beliefs. ReCALL, 27(3), 288–303.Google Scholar
Van Ryn, M. & Heaney, C. A. (1992). What’s the use of theory? Health Education Quarterly, 19(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
van’t Hoof, M. & Vahey, P. (2007). Introduction to special issue on highly mobile computing. Educational Technology, 47(3), 3–5.Google Scholar
Ventakesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P.-P. (2013). Resistance is futile: Toward a non-modern democratization of technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 17(1), 72–92.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(12), 361–385.Google Scholar
Wallinger, L. M. (2000). The role of homework in foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 483–496.Google Scholar
Wang, A., Deutschmann, M. & Steinvall, A. (2013). Towards a model for mapping participation: Exploring factors affecting participation in a telecollaborative learning scenario in Second Life. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Wang, K. (2017). Status quo and prospective of WeChat in improving Chinese English learners’ pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 140–149.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117–134.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuping. (2004). Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 90–121.Google Scholar
Wang, Yijen. (2020). Engagement in PC-based, smartphone-based, and paper-based materials: Learning vocabulary through Chinese Stories. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 2(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v2n1.319.Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-H. (2016) Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 391–415.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. In Fotos, S. (ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3–20). Tokyo: Logos International.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1995). Motivational effects of using computers for writing and communication. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i Symposium (Technical Report #12) (pp. 29–46). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57–71.Google Scholar
Wegmann, E., Stodt, B. & Brand, M. (2018). Cue-induced craving in Internet-communication disorder using visual and auditory cues in a cue-reactivity paradigm. Addiction Research & Theory, 26(4), 306–314.Google Scholar
Weideman, A. (2017). Responsible design in applied linguistics: Theory and practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 32–55.Google Scholar
Weibe, G. & Kabata, K. (2010). Students’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 221–234.Google Scholar
Weibe, T. J. (2016). The information literacy imperative in higher education. Liberal Education, 102 (1), 52–57. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/2015-2016/fall-winter/wiebe.Google Scholar
Williams, M., Mercer, S. & Ryan, S. (2015). Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.Google Scholar
Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Herring, S. (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilensky, U. & Jacobson, M. J. (2014). Complex systems and the learning sciences. In Sawyer, K. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 319–338). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winans, M. D. (2020). Busuu: A social network application to learn languages. CALICO Journal, 37(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
Winke, P. & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students’ computer access and literacy for CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 482–509.Google Scholar
Wong, K., Wang, F. L., Ng, K. K. & Kwan, R. (2015). Investigating Acceptance towards Mobile Learning in Higher Education Students. In Li, K. C., Wong, T. L., Cheung, S. K. S., Lam, J. & Ng, K. K. (eds.), Technology in education. Transforming educational practices with technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Volume 494 (pp. 9–19). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Wong, L.-H., Chin, C.-K., Tan, C.-L. & Liu, M. (2010). Students’ personal and social meaning making in a Chinese idiom mobile learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 15–26.Google Scholar
Wong, L.-H., King, R. B., Chai, C. S. & Liu, M. (2016). Seamlessly learning Chinese: Contextual meaning making and vocabulary growth in a seamless Chinese as a second language learning environment. Instructional Science, 44, 399–422.Google Scholar
Woodill, G. (2015). Instructional design patterns for mobile learning. In Udell, C. & Woodill, G. (eds.), Mastering mobile learning: Tips and techniques for success (pp. 213–222). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Educational psychology (Canadian ed.). Scarborough, ON: Allyn and Bacon Canada.Google Scholar
Wrigglesworth, J. & Harvor, F. (2018). Making their own landscape: Smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437–458.Google Scholar
Xie, W. (2019). An analysis of fragmented reading and its social impact on college students in the era of new media. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3(3), 33–37.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassles? Journal of Legal Education, 57(4), 1–44.Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Xie, Y. (2013). Learning Chinese idioms through iPads. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 12–22.Google Scholar
Yang, S. & Mei, B. (2018). Understanding learners’ use of augmented reality in language learning: Insights from a case study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(4), 511–513.Google Scholar
Yang, S.-H. (2012). Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 148–154.Google Scholar
Yashima, T. (2014). Self-regulation and autonomous dependency amongst Japanese learners of English. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 60–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, R. (1988). Computer-assisted language learning conversations: Negotiating an outcome. CALICO Journal, 5(3), 65–83.Google Scholar
Zainudden, Z. & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 41 (1), 115–126.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Song, W. & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203–221.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. (2020, March 20). The great online-learning experiment: Let’s use the coronavirus crisis to determine the effectiveness of online learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 66(25). Available from www.chronicle.com/article/Coronavirusthe-Great/248216.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: Mobile Assisted Language Learning
  • Online publication: 23 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652087.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: Mobile Assisted Language Learning
  • Online publication: 23 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652087.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: Mobile Assisted Language Learning
  • Online publication: 23 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652087.011
Available formats
×