Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:01:09.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2019

Edited by
Erik R. Thomas
Erik R. Thomas
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mexican American English
Substrate Influence and the Birth of an Ethnolect
 , pp. 312 - 349
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsæther, Finn, Marzo, Stefania, Nistov, Ingvild, and Ceuleers, Evy. 2015. Indexing locality: Contemporary urban vernaculars in Belgium and Norway. In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.), 249–70.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Alam, Farhana, and Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2011. Identity and ethnicity in /t/ in Glasgow-Pakistani high-school girls. In Proceedings of ICPhS XVII, Hong Kong, 17–21Aug 2011, 216–19.Google Scholar
Allen, Harold B., ed. 1976. The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest: The Pronunciation, vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Roger W., and Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1996. The primacy of aspect in first and second-language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In Ritchie, William C. and Bhatia, Tej K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 527–70. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Anshen, Frank. 1969. Speech variation among Negroes in a small southern community. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Arthur, Bradford, Farrar, Dorothee, and Bradford, George. 1974. Evaluation reactions of college students to dialect differences in the English of Mexican-Americans. Language and Speech 17: 255–70.Google Scholar
Ash, Sharon, and Myhill, John. 1986. Linguistic correlates of inter-ethnic contact. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, 33–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby. 1962. The Regional Vocabulary of Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Avis, Walter S. 1972. The phonemic segments of an Edmonton idiolect. In Davis, Lawrence M. (ed.), Studies in Linguistics in Honor of Raven I. McDavid, Jr., 239–50. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J., and Bates, Douglas M.. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, and Sand, Lori. 1991. The focus of linguistic innovation in Texas. English World-Wide 12: 195–214.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, and Sand, Lori. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3: 241–64.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, and Sand, Lori. 1993. Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5: 359–90.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, and Sand, Lori. 1996. The linguistic consequences of catastrophic events: An example from the American Southwest. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renée, Davidson, Brad, Schwenter, Scott, and Solomon, Julie (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Selected Papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford, 435–51. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej. 2007. Phonological Variation and Change in the Dialect of Charleston, South Carolina. Publication of the American Dialect Society 92. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej, and Turton, Danielle. 2015. T/D deletion in British English revisited: Evidence for the long-lost morphological effect. Paper presented at NWAV 44, Toronto.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Federica. 2005. Quotative use in American English: A corpus-based, cross-register comparison. Journal of English Linguistics 33: 222–56.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Older men and younger women: A corpus-based study of quotative use in American English. English World-Wide 28: 23–45.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1991. Variation theory and second language learning: Linguistic and social constraints on interlanguage tense marking. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1994a. Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6: 303–26.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1994b. Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past tense marking in Chinese-English. In Tarone, Elaine E., Gass, Susan M. and Cohen, Andrew D. (eds.), Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, 157–81. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1996. Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation, 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1997. Variation in Tejano English: Evidence for variable lexical phonology. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Thomas, and Sabino, Robin (eds.), Language Variety in the South Revisited, 197–209. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1999. Relativization strategies in Mexican-American English. American Speech 74: 115–39.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, and Holland, Cory. 2014. Variation in Chicano English: The case of final (z) devoicing. American Speech 89: 385–407.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, and Langman, Juliet. 2004. Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 42: 303–18.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, and Regan, Vera. 2004. Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 323–38.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, and Santa Ana, Otto. 2008. Chicano English: Morphology and syntax. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean, vol. 2, 572–90. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Díaz-Campos, Manuel, McGory, Julia Tevis, and Morgan, Terrell A.. 2002. Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus 14: 9–36.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia, and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 9–54. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benítez, Carrahlee. 1970. A study of some non-standard English features in the speech of seventh-grade Mexican-Americans enrolled in a remedial reading program in an urban community of south Texas. M.A. thesis, Texas A&I University [now Texas A&M University at Kingsville].Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin. 2010. Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 159–83.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J., Fox, Michael J., and Balkman, Jared. 2011. The bag that Scott bought: The low vowels in northwest Wisconsin. American Speech 86: 271–311.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Cynthia G. 1993. Measuring social causes of phonological variation in Texas. American Speech 68: 227–40.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Cynthia G. 1994. A phonological survey of Texas: Cluster analysis of Texas Poll data. In Viereck, Wolfgang (ed.), ZDL-Beiheft 76: Proceedings of the International Congress of Dialectologists, Bamberg 1990, vol. 3, 39–51. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Cynthia G., and Bernstein, Robert. 1998. Phonological innovation in east Texas: Different samples, similar explanations. American Speech 73: 44–56.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1995. A Direct Realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, 171–204. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., McRoberts, Gerald W., and Goodell, Elizabeth. 2000. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 775–94.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., McRoberts, Gerald W., and Sithole, Nomathemba M.. 1988. Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 345–60.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Anil K. 1943. On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society 35: 99–109.Google Scholar
Bills, Garland D. 1977. Vernacular Chicano English: Dialect or interference? Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest 2: 30–36.Google Scholar
Blyth, Carl Jr., Recktenwald, Sigrid, and Wang, Jenny. 1990. I’m like, “Say what?!”: A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65: 215–27.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2004. Ethnic patterns in the phonetics of Montreal English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 538–68.Google Scholar
Bodén, Petra. 2004. A new variety of Swedish? In Cassidy, Steve, Cox, Felicity, Mannell, Robert, and Palethorpe, Sallyanne (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 475–80. Sydney: Macquarie University. www.assta.org/sst/2004/proceedings/.Google Scholar
Bodén, Petra. 2007. “Rosengårdssvensk” fonetik och fonologi [“Rosegarden Swedish” phonetics and phonology]. In Ekberg, Lena (ed.), Språket hos ungdomar i en flerspråkig miljö i Malmö [The Language of Youth in a Multilingual Setting in Malmö], 1–47. Nordlund: Småskrifter från Nordiska språk i Lund 27. Lund, Sweden: Nordiska språk, Språk- och litteraturcentrum. http://projekt.ht.lu.se/nordlund/nordlund-27-spraket-hos-ungdomar-i-en-flersprakig-miljo-i-malmo/.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5: 341–45.Google Scholar
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen, and Flege, James Emil. 1993. Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 21: 267–90.Google Scholar
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen, and Flege, James Emil. 1997. Per[c]eption and production of a new vowel. In James, Allan and Leather, Jonathan (eds.), Second-Language Speech: Structure and Process. Studies on Language Acquisition 13, 53–73. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Brown, Richard (ed.), Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Exchange, 71–112. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, et al. 1999. The Weight of the World: Suffering in Contemporary Society. (Original title: Misère du Monde.) Translated by Pricilla Parkhurst Ferguson. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Sally, Hoffman, Michol F., and Walker, James A.. 2015. Sociolinguistic variation among multilingual youth: Comparing Swedish cities and Toronto. In Nortier, and Svendsen, (eds.), 290–306.Google Scholar
Bradac, J. J., and Wisegarver, R.. 1984. Ascribed status, lexical diversity, and accent: Determinants of perceived status, solidarity, and control of speech style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 239–55.Google Scholar
Brannen, Kathleen. 2011. The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Brennan, Eileen M., and Brennan, John Stephen. 1981a. Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech 24: 207–21.Google Scholar
Brennan, Eileen M., and Brennan, John Stephen. 1981b. Measurements of accent and attitude toward Mexican American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 487–501.Google Scholar
Brennan, Eileen M., Carranza, Miguel A., and Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1980. Attitudes of Mexican American adolescents in two Midwestern cities. In Schach, Paul (ed.), Languages in Conflict: Linguistic Acculturation on the Great Plains, 148–56. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Dolores. 1989. El habla juvenile de Sonora, México: La fonética de 32 jóvenes. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 37: 43–82.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brumbaugh, Susan, and Koops, Christian. 2017. Vowel variation in Albuquerque, New Mexico. In Fridland, Valerie, Evans, Betsy, Kendall, Tyler, and Wassink, Alicia Beckford (eds.), Speech in the Western States: The Inland West, vol. 2, 31–57. Publication of the American Dialect Society 102. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, and New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41.4: 977–90.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006a. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 3–30.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006b. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the “new” quotatives in the UK. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 362–81.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2008. The location of global linguistic variants. English World-Wide 29: 15–44.Google Scholar
Bull, John, and Benjamin, Carmen. 2004. A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish. 4th edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate, and Kortmann, Bernd, eds. 2008. Varieties of English: The Pacific and Australasia, vol. 3. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 1980. Narrative go “say.” American Speech 55: 304–07.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 1982. Editor’s note. American Speech 57: 149.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 1989. The Death of Black English: Divergence and Convergence in Black and White Vernaculars. Bamberger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 25. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Lexical diffusion in regular sound change. In Restle, David and Zaefferer, Dietmar (eds.), Sounds and Systems. Studies in Structure and Change, 59–74. A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann (Trends in Linguistics). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Krivokapic, Jelena, and Lee, Sungbok. 2006. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of phrase boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120: 1589–99.Google Scholar
Callahan, Erin E. 2008. “Accommodation without assimilation”: Past tense unmarking and peak accent alignment in Hispanic English. M.A. thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Callahan, Erin E. 2013. Emerging Hispanic English in the Southeast U.S.: Grammatical Variation in a Triethnic Community. Ph.D. Dissertation, Durham: Duke University.Google Scholar
Callahan, Erin. 2018. Emerging Hispanicized English in the Nuevo New South: Language Variation in a Triethnic Community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82: 32–64.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37: 637–59.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21: 135–56.Google Scholar
Card, David, and Lewis, Ethan G.. 2007. The diffusion of Mexican immigrants during the 1990s: Explanations and impacts. In Borjas, George J. (ed.), Mexican Immigration to the United States, 193–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlock, Elizabeth K. 1979. Prosodic analysis of two varieties of Buffalo English. In Wölck, Wolfgang and Garvin, Paul L. (eds.), The Fifth LACUS Forum 1978, 377–82. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Carlock, Elizabeth, and Wolfgang, Wölck. 1981. A method for isolating diagnostic linguistic variables: The Buffalo ethnolects experiment. In Sankoff, David and Cedergren, Henrietta (eds.), Variation Omnibus, 17–24. Current Inquiry into Language, Linguistics, and Human Communication 40. Edmonton, AB: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Carranza, Miguel A. 1982. Attitudinal research on Hispanic language varieties. In Ryan, Ellen Bouchard and Giles, Howard (eds.), Attitudes towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Issues, 63–83. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Carranza, Miguel A., and Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1975. Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American adolescents toward speakers of English and Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6: 83–104.Google Scholar
Carter, Paul. 2003. Extrinsic phonetic interpretation: Spectral variation in English liquids. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard, and Temple, Rosalind (eds.), Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, 237–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Phillip M. 2005a. Prosodic variation in SLA: Rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 59–71.Google Scholar
Carter, Phillip M. 2005b. Quantifying rhythmic differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English. In Gess, Randall (ed.), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 63–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carter, Phillip M. 2007. Phonetic variation and speaker agency: Mexicana identity in a North Carolina middle school. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13.2: 1–14.Google Scholar
Carter, Phillip M. 2013. Shared spaces, shared structures: Latino social formation and African American English in the U.S. South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17: 66–92.Google Scholar
Carter, Phillip M., and Lynch, Andrew. 2015. Multilingual Miami: Current trends in sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 9: 369–85.Google Scholar
Castro-Gingrás, Rosario. 1972. An Analysis of the Linguistic Characteristics of the English Found in a Set of Mexican-American Child Data. ERIC document ED 111002.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta Cecilia Jonas. 1973. The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1998. Social embedding of changes in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 5–36.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2003. Sociolinguistics of immigration. In Britain, David and Cheshire, Jenny (eds.), Social Dialectology: Studies in Honour of Peter Trudgill, 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue, and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 151–96.Google Scholar
Childs, Becky, Reaser, Jeffrey, and Wolfram, Walt. 2003. Defining ethnic varieties in the Bahamas: Phonological accommodation in Black and white ethnic communities. In Aceto, Michael and Williams, Jeffrey P. (eds.), Contact Englishes of the Eastern Caribbean, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chun, Elaine. 2001. The construction of white, black, and Korean American identities through African American Vernacular English. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 52–64.Google Scholar
Chung, May Fung. 2014. The Hmong among many: A descriptive analysis of a Southern interlanguage variety. M.A. capstone project, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Cichocki, Wladyslaw, and Lepetit, Daniel. 1986. Intonational variability in language contact: F0 declination in Ontario French. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, 239–47. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clifton, Ernest S. 1959. Some [u]-[ju] variations in Texas. American Speech 34: 190–93.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., and Smiljanic, Rajka. 2011. Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics 39: 237–45.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., and Smiljanic, Rajka. 2015. Regional variation in temporal organization in American English. Journal of Phonetics 49: 1–15.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14: 83–89.Google Scholar
Coe, Norman. 2001. Speakers of Spanish and Catalan. In Swan, Michael and Smith, Bernard (eds.), Learner English, 90–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. 2004. What it means to be a loser: Non-optimal candidates in optimality theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Cohen, Andrew. 1975. A Sociolinguistic Approach to Bilingual Education. Rowley, MA: Newberry.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura. 2011. Broad-focus declaratives in Argentine Spanish contact and non-contact varieties. In Gabriel, Christoph and Lleó, Conxita (eds.), Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-Linguistic and Bilingual Studies, 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, and Gurlekian, Jorge. 2004. Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7: 107–19.Google Scholar
Coye, Dale F. 2009. Dialect boundaries in New Jersey. American Speech 84: 414–52.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2002. She say, She go, She be like: Verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English. American Speech 77: 3–31.Google Scholar
Cummins, Fred. 2002. Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. In Bel, Bernard and Marlien, Isabelle (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence, 121–26. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. http://aune.lpl.univ-aix.fr/sp2002/.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 2000. The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 60–80.Google Scholar
Dakin, Robert F. 1971. South Midland speech in the old Northwest. Journal of English Linguistics 5: 31–48.Google Scholar
Dankovičová, Jana. 2001. The Linguistic Basis of Articulation Rate Variation in Czech. Frankfurt am Main: T. Hector.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. Contextualizing St. John’s youth English within the Canadian quotative system. Journal of English Linguistics 32: 323–45.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–18. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Google Scholar
De Johnson, Teresa, O’Connell, Daniel, and Sabin, Edward. 1979. Temporal analysis of English and Spanish narratives. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13.6: 347–50.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre C., and Freeman, Donald C.. 1968. A dialect study of American r’s by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics 44: 29–68.Google Scholar
de la Zerda, Nancy, and Hopper, Robert. 1979. Employment interviewers’ reactions to Mexican American speech. Communication Monographs 46: 126–34.Google Scholar
de la Zerda Flores, Nancy, and Hopper, Robert. 1975. Mexican American’s evaluations of spoken Spanish and English. Speech Monographs 42: 91–98.Google Scholar
De León, Arnoldo. 1982. The Tejano Community, 1836–1900. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
De León, Arnoldo, and Griswold del Castillo, Richard. 2006. North to Aztlán: A History of Mexican Americans in the United States. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dellwo, Volker. 2006. Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ΔC. In Karnowski, Pawel and Szigeti, Imre (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Budapest, 231–41. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2007. Playing with the voice of the other: Stylized Kanaksprak in conversation among German adolescents. In Auer, Peter (ed.), Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity, 325–60. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2001. The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics 29: 217–30.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2003. An instrumental study of the monophthong vowels of Singapore English. English World-Wide 24: 1–16.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2005. Emergent patterns in the vowels of Singapore English. English World-Wide 26: 179–97.Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004. Retention or omission of the ne in advanced French interlanguage: The variable effect of extralinguistic factors. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 433–50.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Lonna J. 1975. The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly 9: 401–07.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Wayne B. 1976. The psycholinguistic unity of language learning and language change. Language Learning 26: 215–31.Google Scholar
Dinken, Aaron J. 2011. Weakening resistance: Progress toward the low back merger in New York State. Language Variation and Change 23: 315–45.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna. 1992. Hypercorrection in response to the apparent merger of (ɔ) and (ɑ) in Utah English. Language and Communication 12: 267–92.Google Scholar
Dirim, İnci, and Auer, Peter. 2004. Türkisch sprechen nicht nur die Türken: Über die Unschärfebeziehung zwischen Sprache und Ethnie in Deutschland [Not Just the Turks Speak Turkish: On the Fuzzy Relationship between Speech and Ethnicity in Germany]. Linguistik–Impulse & Tendenzen 4. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 2010. Phonological variation in contemporary spoken British English. In Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, 59–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin, and Kohn, Mary E.. 2012. Urban rejection of the vernacular: The SVS undone. Language Variation and Change 24: 221–45.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette, Eckert, Penelope, Podesva, Robert J., Pratt, Teresa, and Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2016. The low vowels in California’s Central Valley. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy, and Wassink, Alicia Beckford (eds.), Speech in the Western States: The Coastal States, vol. 1, 11–32. Publication of the American Dialect Society 101. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dorleijn, Margreet, Mous, Maarten, and Nortier, Jacomine. 2015. Urban youth speech styles in Kenya and the Netherlands. In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.), 271–89.Google Scholar
Doviak, Martin J., and Hudson-Edwards, Allison. 1980. Phonological variation in Chicano English: Word-final (z)-devoicing. In Blansitt, Edward L. and Teschner, Richard V., (eds.), Festscrift for Jacob Ornstein, 82–95. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2011. Glottal variation in /t/ in non-native English speech. English World-Wide 32: 280–308.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2012a. Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change 24: 107–33.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2012b. The Manchester Polish STRUT: Dialect acquisition in a second language. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 65–93.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, and Horvath, Barbara. 1998a. From accent to marker in Cajun English: A study in dialect formation in progress. English World-Wide 19: 161–88.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, and Horvath, Barbara. 1998b. Let’s tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10: 245–61.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, and Horvath, Barbara. 1999. When the music changes, you change too: Gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11: 287–313.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C., and Burt, M. K.. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53.Google Scholar
Dunstan, Stephanie Brett. 2010. Identities in transition: The use of AAVE grammatical features by Hispanic adolescents in two North Carolina communities. American Speech 85: 185–204.Google Scholar
Durham Public Schools. 2010. Quick facts: Student racial composition. www.dpsnc.net/about-dps/district-stats-and-scores/dps-quick-facts (12 September 2010).Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1: 245–67.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008a. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008b. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 25–42.Google Scholar
Edgerton, William B. 1935. Another note on the Southern pronunciation of “long i.” American Speech 10: 190.Google Scholar
Elliott, Zuzana, and Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2015. Production of face and goat by Slovak and Czech immigrants in Edinburgh. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0328.pdf.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1987. Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 1–20.Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel. 2017. The limits of named language varieties and the role of social salience in dialectal contact: The case of Spanish in the United States. Language and Linguistics Compass 11: e12232. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12232.Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel, and Guy, Gregory. 2012. The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language 88: 526–57.Google Scholar
Evans, Bronwen G., Mistry, Ajay, and Moreiras, Caroline. 2007. An acoustic study of first- and second-generation Gujarati immigrants in Wembley: Evidence for accent convergence? In Proceedings of ICPhS XVI, Saarbrücken, 6–10 August 2007, 1741–44. www.icphs2007.de.Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L., and Prieto, Pilar. 2007. Rising accents in Castilian Spanish: A revision of Sp_ToBI. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 6: 117–46.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna. 2010. Rhythm types and the speech of working-class youth in a banlieue of Paris: The role of vowel elision and devoicing. In Preston, Dennis R. and Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 91–132. Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs 219. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna, and Stewart, Christopher M.. 2011. Prosodic style-shifting in preadolescent peer-group interactions in a working-class suburb of Paris. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 75–99.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1972. Tense Marking in Black English: A Linguistic and Social Analysis. Urban Language Series 8. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fernández-Kelly, Patricia, and Massey, Douglas S.. 2007. Borders for whom? The role of NAFTA in Mexico-U.S. migration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610: 98–118.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen, and Bell, Barbara. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like. American Speech 70: 265–90.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. 1958. Social influences in the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14: 47–56.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1966. Language Loyalty in the United States. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A., and Herasimchuk, Eleanor. 1971. The multiple prediction of phonological variables in a bilingual speech community. In Fishman, Joshua A., Cooper, Robert L., Ma, Roxana, et al. (eds.), Bilingualism in the Barrio, 465–79. Indiana University publications, Language science monographs 7. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15: 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1991. Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 395–411.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, 233–77. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1997. English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the “similar” vs “new” distinction. In James, Allan and Leather, Jonathan (eds.), Second-Language Speech: Structure and Process, 11–52. Studies on Language Acquisition 13. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil, and Eefting, Wieke. 1986. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43: 155–71.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil, and Eefting, Wieke. 1987. Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 15: 67–83.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil, and Eefting, Wieke. 1988. Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 83: 729–40.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil, Munro, Murray, and Fox, Robert. 1995. The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2540–51.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet. 2010. The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, William, Laver, John, and Gibbon, Fiona (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Flores-Bayer, Isla. 2017. Sociolinguistic variation in practice: An ethnographic study of stylistic variation and social meaning in the Chicano English of ‘El Barrio.’ Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne. 1996. A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition. In Ritchie, William C. and Bhatia, Tej K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 121–58. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Foley, Douglas E. 1988. From Peones to Politicos: Class and Ethnicity in a South Texas Town, 1900–1987. 2nd edn. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Douglas E. 1990. Learning Capitalist Culture: Deep in the Heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, Jon. 2015. Community rules and speaker behavior: Individual adherence to group constraints on (ING). Language Variation and Change 27: 377–406.Google Scholar
Forrest, Jon. 2017. The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING). Language Variation and Change 29: 129–156.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 1999. A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 5–23.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2003. Chicano English in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2006. Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen and Fought, John. 2003. Prosodic rhythm patterns in Chicano English. Unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Fox, John and Weisberg, Sanford. 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert Allen, and Jacewicz, Ewa. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126: 2603–18.Google Scholar
Fox, Sue. 2010. Ethnicity, religion, and practices: Adolescents in the East End of London. In Llamas, Carmen and Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and Identities, 144–56. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Sue, Khan, Arfaan, and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. The emergence and diffusion of Multicultural English. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 19–44.Google Scholar
Fox, Susan, and Sharma, Devyani. 2017. The language of London and Londoners. In Heinrich, Patrick and Smakman, Dick (eds.), Urban Sociolinguistics: The City as a Linguistic Process and Experience. Florence, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. 1978. South Midland pronunciation in the North Central States. American Speech 53: 40–48.Google Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. 1996. Chicano English and Spanish interference in the Midwestern United States. American Speech 71: 72–85.Google Scholar
Frazier, E. Franklin. 1925. Durham, capital of the black middle class. In Locke, Alain (ed.), The New Negro: Voice of the Harlem Renaissance, 333–340. New York: Albert & Charles Boni.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Cornips, Leonie, Ganuza, Natalia, Nistov, Ingvild, and Upsahl, Toril. 2015. Beyond verb second – A matter of novel information-structural effects? Evidence from Norwegian, Swedish, German and Dutch. In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.), 73–92.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Mayr, Katharina, Özçelik, Tiner, and Wiese, Heike. 2011. Kiezdeutsch as a multiethnolect. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 45–74.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. 1999. The southern shift in Memphis, Tennessee. Language Variation and Change 11: 267–85.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, and Farrington, Charlie. 2014. Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136: 341–49.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph, Feldhauser, Ingo, and Andrea, Pešková. 2011. Prosodic phrasing in Porteño Spanish. In Gabriel, Christoph & Lleó, Conxita (eds.), Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-Linguistic and Bilingual Studies, 153–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Galindo, Delma Letticia. 1987. Linguistic influence and variation on the English of Chicano adolescents in Austin, Texas. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Galindo, Delma Letticia. 1988. Towards a description of Chicano English: A sociolinguistic perspective. In Ferrara, Kathleen, Brown, Becky, Walters, Keith, and Baugh, John (eds.), Linguistic Change and Contact (Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in Language), 113–22. Texas linguistic forum 30. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
García, Juliet Villareal. 1976. The regional vocabulary of Brownsville, Texas. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
García, Manuel. 1974. Toward a grammar of Chicano English. English Journal 63.3: 34–38.Google Scholar
García, Maryellen. 1984. Parameters of the east Los Angeles speech community. In Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob (ed.), Form and Function in Chicano English, 85–98. Rowley, MA: Newberry House.Google Scholar
Gatbontin, Elizabeth, Trofimovich, Pavel, and Segalowitz, Norman. 2011. Ethnic group affiliation and patterns of a phonological variable. The Modern Language Journal 95: 188–204.Google Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly L., and Long, Avizia Yim. 2014. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition: Learning to Use a Language in Context. Florence, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Williams, Angie, Mackie, Diane M., and Rosselli, Francine. 1995. Reactions to Anglo- and Hispanic-American-accented speakers: Affect, identity, persuasion, and the English-only controversy. Language & Communication 15: 107–20.Google Scholar
Githiora, Chege. 2002. Sheng: Peer language, Swahili dialect or emerging creole? Journal of African Cultural Studies 15: 159–81.Google Scholar
Godinez, Manuel Jr. 1984. Chicano English phonology: Norms vs. interference phenomena. In Ornstein-Galicia (ed.), 42–47.Google Scholar
Godinez, Manuel Jr., and Maddieson, Ian. 1985. Vowel differences between Chicano and General Californian English? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 53: 43–58.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Lynn M. 1987. Standard English: The only target for nonnative speakers of English? TESOL Quarterly 21: 417–36.Google Scholar
González, Gustavo. 1976. Some characteristics of the English used by migrant Spanish-speaking children in Texas. Aztlán 7: 27–49.Google Scholar
González, Gustavo. 1984. The range of Chicano English. In Ornstein-Galicia (ed.), 32–41.Google Scholar
González, Gustavo. 1988. Chicano English. In Bixler-Márquez, Dennis J. and Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob (eds.), Chicano Speech in the Bilingual Classroom, 71–81. American university studies VI, Foreign language instruction 6. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2000. Phonological correlates of ethnic identity: Evidence of divergence? American Speech 75: 115–36.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2006. Tracking the low back merger in Missouri. In Murray, Thomas E. and Simon, Beth Lee (eds.), Language Variation and Change in the American Midland: A New Look at “Heartland” English, 57–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goto, Hiromu. 1971. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”. Neuropsychologia 9: 317–23.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis, and Farrar, Kimberley. 2000. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 28: 161–85.Google Scholar
Gregg, R. J. 1957. Neutralisation and fusion of vocalic phonemes in Canadian English as spoken in the Vancouver area. Journal of the Canadian Linguistic Association 3: 78–83.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60: 98–128.Google Scholar
Guitart, Jorge M. 1978. Aspects of Spanish aspect: A new look at the preterit/imperfect distinction. In Suñer, Margarita (ed.), Contemporary Studies in Romance Linguistics, 132–68. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1980. Variation in the group and in the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, 1–36. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1991. Explanation in variable phonology. Language Variation and Change 3: 1–22.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., and Boyd, Sally. 1990. The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 2: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2010. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2013. “Flip-flop” and mergers-in-progress. English Language and Linguistics 17: 359–90.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Westley H. 1977. Phonological variations observed in San Antonio, Texas. Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest 2: 83–93.Google Scholar
Hammond, Robert M. 2001. The Sounds of Spanish: Analysis and Application (with Special Reference to American English). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2011. –t,d deletion and the acquisition of linguistic variation by second language learners of English. Language Learning 61: 1256–301.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2016. The deletion of /t,d/ in Hong Kong English. World Englishes 35: 60–77.Google Scholar
Hansen-Thomas, Holly. 2008. An investigation of innovative quotatives in adolescent Chicana English in Texas. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 19–39.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas, and Reubold, Ulrich. 2008. Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123: 2825–35.Google Scholar
Harris, Maverick Marvin. 1969. The retroflexion of postvocalic /r/ in Austin. American Speech 44: 263–71.Google Scholar
Hart, Elva Treviño. 1999. Barefoot Heart: Stories of a Migrant Child. Tempe, AZ. Bilingual Press.Google Scholar
Hartford, Beverly Ann Slattery. 1975. The English of Mexican American adolescents in Gary, Indiana: A sociolinguistic description. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Hartford, Beverly [Ann] S[lattery]. 1978a. Phonological differences in the English of adolescent female and male Mexican-Americans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 17: 55–64.Google Scholar
Hartford, Beverly [Ann] S[lattery]. 1978b. Phonological differences in the English of adolescent Chicanas and Chicanos. In Dubois, Betty Lou and Crouch, Isabel (eds.), Papers in Southwest English IV: Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of the Languages of American Women, 73–80. San Antonio: Trinity University.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer B., Warren, Paul, and Drager, Katie. 2006. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34: 458–84.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce P. 2000. Gradient well-formedness in optimality theory. In Dekkers, Joost, van der Leeuw, Frank, and van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology, and Acquisition, 88–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. 2008. (ING): A vernacular baseline for English in Appalachia. American Speech 83: 116–40.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. 2011. Flying high above the social radar: Coronal stop deletion in modern Appalachia. Language Variation and Change 23: 105–37.Google Scholar
Henderson, Alan, Goldman-Eisler, Frieda, and Skarbek, Andrew. 1966. Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 8: 236–242.Google Scholar
Hernández, Pilar. 1993. Vowel shift in northern New Mexico Chicano English. Mester 22: 227–34.Google Scholar
Herold, Ruth. 1997. Solving the actuation problem: Merger and immigration in eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change 9: 165–89.Google Scholar
Herrera, Z., Esther, . 2006. El debilitamiento de /tʃ/ en dos variedades del español Americano. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 54: 557–69.Google Scholar
Hirson, Allen, and Sohail, Nabiah. 2007. Variability of rhotics in Punjabi-English bilinguals. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, 6–10 August 2007, 1501–04. www.icphs2007.de.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F. 2010. The role of social factors in the Canadian Vowel Shift: Evidence from Toronto. American Speech 85: 121–40.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F., and Walker, James A.. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22: 37–67.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Thomas. 2011. The Black Kenyan English vowel system: An acoustic phonetic analysis. English World-Wide 32: 147–73.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara, and Sankoff, David. 1987. Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16: 179–204.Google Scholar
Hosoda, Megumi, Nguyen, Lam T., and Stone-Romero, Eugene F.. 2012. The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology 27: 347–64.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, and Zeileis, Achim. 2014. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Working Papers in Economics and Statistics: Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics 2014–10. Innsbruck, Austria: Universität Innsbruck. http://EconPapers.RePEc.org/RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014–10.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, and Zeileis, Achim. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15.3: 651–74.Google Scholar
Houston, Ann Celeste. 1985. Continuity and change in English morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Houston, Ann Celeste. 1991. A grammatical continuum for (ING). In Trudgill, Peter and Chambers, J. K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 241–57. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Howard, Martin, Mougeon, Raymond, and Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2013. Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 340–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge, UK/ New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie K. 1997. Phonetic variation in intervocalic onset /l/’s in English. Journal of Phonetics 25: 115–41.Google Scholar
Hurst, Ellen. 2009. Tsotsitaal, global culture and local style: Identity and recontextualisation in twenty-first century South African townships. Social Dynamics 35: 244–57.Google Scholar
Intihar, Kendra Day. 2014. Dialect preservation and leveling in Hickory, North Carolina. M.A. capstone paper, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania. 2013. Morphosyntax. In Herschensohn, Julia and Young-Scholten, Martha (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 505–28. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irons, Terry Lynn. 2007. On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19: 137–80.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika. 2010. Accommodation to the local majority norm by Hmong Americans in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. American Speech 85: 141–62.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen, and Salmons, Joseph. 2011. Cross-generational vowel change in American English. Language Variation and Change 23: 45–86.Google Scholar
Jannedy, Stefanie, and Weirich, Melanie. 2014. Sound change in an urban setting: category instability of the palatal fricative in Berlin. Laboratory Phonology 5: 91–122.Google Scholar
Jannedy, Stefanie, Weirich, Melanie, and Helmeke, Luisa. 2015. Acoustic analyses of differences in [ç] and [ʃ] productions in Hood German. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0328.pdf.Google Scholar
Jannedy, Stefanie, Weirich, Melanie, Brunner, J., and Mertins, M.. 2010. Perceptual evidence for allophonic variation of the palatal fricative [ç] in spontaneous Berlin German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128: 2458.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effect variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–83.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Stability and Change along a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England. Publication of the American Dialect Society 95. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2015. Quantifying overlap with Bhattacharyya’s affinity and other measures! Paper presented at the 44th conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Toronto, 25 October.Google Scholar
Johnson, Edith Trager, and Abraham, Frank. 1973. Basic English and Spanish syntax of Spanish-speaking Americans: Some interactions and implications. In Nash, Rose (ed.), Spanish-English Contrastive Linguistics, 72–122. Hato Rey, PR: Inter American University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. “He says … so I said”: Verb tense alternation and narrative depictions of authority in American English. Linguistics 25: 33–52.Google Scholar
José, Brian. 2010. The apparent-time construct, stable variation, and time: A first look at final devoicing in northwest Indiana. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 34–59.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, and Foreman, Christina. 1996. Boundary Tones and Focus Realization in African-American Intonation. Paper presented at the 3rd joint meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Acoustical Society of Japan, Honolulu, Hawaii, December 6.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Quirk, Randolph and Widdowson, Henry G. (eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1988. The sacred cows of English. English Today 4.4: 3–8.Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, Werner, and Keim, Inken. 2003. Linguistic variation and the construction of social identity in a German-Turkish setting: A case study of an immigrant youth group in Mannheim, Germany. In Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. and Georagakopoulou, Alexandra (eds.), Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities, 29–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Karstadt, Angela. 1996. Relative markers in Swedish-American English: Evidence for a contact language phenomenon? American Speech 71: 27–48.Google Scholar
Kasarda, John D., and Johnson, James H. Jr. 2006. The Economic Impact of the Hispanic Population on the State of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise.Google Scholar
Katz, Josh. 2016. Speaking American: How Y’all, Youse, and You Guys Talk. A Visual Guide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudolf E. 1961. German Dialects: Phonology and Morphology, with Selected Texts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler. 2007. The Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project: Empowering the sociolinguistic archive. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13.2: 15–26.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler. 2009. Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler. 2013. Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Thomas, Erik R.. 2010. Dissecting rate of speech: The effect of phrase final lengthening on articulation rate. Poster presented at the Second Pan American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics/160th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (ASA160): Cancun, Mexico.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike. 2011. Rhythm in Turkish German talk-in-action. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 161–90.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike, and Selting, Margret, eds. 2011. Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas. Studies in language variation 8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kerr, Homer Lee. 1953. Migration into Texas, 1865–1880. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8: 177–202.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In Chambers, Jack K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2003. Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Britain, David and Cheshire, Jenny (eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, pp. 223–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29: 65–115.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, Torgersen, Eivind Nessa, and Fox, Susan. 2008. Reversing “drift”: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change 20: 451–91.Google Scholar
Khan, Farhat. 1991. Final consonant cluster simplification in a variety of Indian English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 288–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khattab, Ghada. 1999. A sociophonetic study of English-Arabic bilingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics & Phonetics 7: 79–94.Google Scholar
Kiessling, Roland, and Mous, Maarten. 2004. Urban youth languages in Africa. Anthropological Linguistics 46: 303–41.Google Scholar
Kirkham, Sam. 2017. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in Sheffield English liquids. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 47: 17–35.Google Scholar
Kirkham, Sam, and Wormald, Jessica. 2015. Acoustic and articulatory variation in British Asian English liquids. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0328.pdf.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3: 129–40.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1980. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 971–95.Google Scholar
Klipple, Carmelita. 1945. The speech of Spicewood, Texas. American Speech 20: 187–91.Google Scholar
Knack, Rebecca. 1991. Ethnic boundaries in linguistic variation. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, 251–72. Quantitative analyses of linguistic structure 5. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth. 2008. Latino English in North Carolina: A Comparison of Emerging Communities. M.A. Thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth. 2014. “The Way I Communicate Changes but How I Speak Don’t”: A Longitudinal Perspective on Adolescent Language Variation and Change. Publication of the American Dialect Society 99. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth, and Farrington, Charlie. 2017. Longitudinal sociophonetic analysis: What to expect when working with child and adolescent data. In Wagner, Suzanne Evans and Buchstaller, Isabelle (eds.), Using Panel Data in the Sociolinguistic Study of Variation and Change, 101–128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth, and Franz, Hannah Askin. 2009. Localized patterns for global variants: The case of quotative systems of African American and Latino speakers. American Speech 84: 259–97.Google Scholar
Konopka, Kenneth, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2008. Vowels in contact: Mexican Heritage English in Chicago. Texas Linguistic Forum 52: 94–103.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1988. Immigrant children’s Swedish – A new variety? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9: 129–140.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1992. Immigrant adolescents’ Swedish in multicultural areas. In Palmgren, Cecilia, Lövgren, Karin, and Bolin, Göran (eds.), Ethnicity in Youth Culture: Report from a Symposium in Stockholm, Sweden June 3 –6, 1991, 43–62. Stockholm: Youth Research Centre, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1998. Language contact in Rinkeby, an immigrant suburb. In Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. and Scholz, Arno (eds.), Jugendsprache, Langue des Jeunes, Youth Language: Linguistische und Soziolinguistische Perspektiven [Youth Language: Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives], 125–48. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, and McDavid, Raven I. Jr. 1961. Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972a. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972b. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–98.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1991. The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, 1–44. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Language in Society 20. Oxford, UK/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Language in Society 29. Oxford, UK/ Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, and Lewis, John. 1968. A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Report on Cooperative Research Project 3288. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Harris, Wendell. 1986. De facto segregation of black and white vernaculars. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, 1–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Indgrid, and Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrimentation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89: 30–65.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis. In Helm, June (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, Schepman, Astrid, White, Laurence, Quarmby, Louise May, and Stackhouse, Rebeckah. 2009. Structural and dialectal effects on pitch peak alignment in two varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 37: 145–61.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Laferriere, Martha. 1979. Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55: 603–17.Google Scholar
Lane, Lisa Ann. 2000. Trajectories of linguistic variation: Emergence of a dialect. Language Variation and Change 12: 267–94.Google Scholar
Lanehart, Sonja L., ed. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lastra de Suarez, Yolanda. 1975. El habla y la educación de los niños de origen mexicano en Los Angeles. In Hernandez-Chaves, Eduardo, Cohen, Andrew, and Beltramo, Anthony (eds.), El Lengua de los Chicanos, 61–69. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lee, Jinsok. 2016. The participation of a northern New Jersey Korean American community in local and national language variation. American Speech 91: 327–60.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1988. Lectures on Language Contact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Heini. 2011. Developing multiethnic youth language in Helsinki. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 291–318.Google Scholar
Leinonen, Therese. 2010. An acoustic analysis of vowel pronunciation in Swedish dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lewis, Thomas D. 2015. A way to sustained salience: Cultural identity, social networks, and language attitude in Lorain Puerto Rican English. M.A. thesis, Ball State University.Google Scholar
Lichter, Daniel T., Parisi, Domenico, Taquino, Michael C., and Michael Grice, Steven. 2010. Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared. Social Science Research 39: 215–30.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2007. El Español de América. 5th edn. Madrid: Catédra.Google Scholar
Lloyd James, Arthur. 1940. Speech Signals in Telephony. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 606–08.Google Scholar
Loman, Bengt. 1975. Prosodic patterns in a Negro American dialect. In Ringbom, Håkan, Ingberg, Alfhild, Norrman, Ralf, Nyholm, Kurt, Westman, Rolf, and Wikberg, Kay (eds.), Style and Text: Studies Presented to Nils Erik Enkvist, 219–42. Stockholm: Språkförlaget Skriptor AB.Google Scholar
Low, Ee Ling, and Grabe, Esther. 1995. Prosodic patterns in Singapore English. In Elenius, Kjell and Branderud, Peter (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 3, 636–39. Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Low, Ee Ling, Grabe, Esther, and Nolan, Francis. 2000. Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech 43: 377–401.Google Scholar
Lynn, Klonda. 1940. A phonetic analysis of the English spoken by Mexican children in the elementary schools of Arizona. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Lynn, Klonda. 1945. Bilingualism in the Southwest. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 31: 175–80.Google Scholar
Ma, Roxana, and Herasimchuk, Eleanor. 1971. The linguistic dimensions of a bilingual neighborhood. In Fishman, Joshua A., Cooper, Robert L., Roxana, Ma, et al. (eds.), Bilingualism in the Barrio, 347–464. Indiana University publications, Language science monographs 7. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Macauley, Ronald. 2001. “You’re like Why not?”: The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5: 3–21.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Marguerite Goodrich. 1985. Cuban-American English: the second generation in Miami. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida at Gainesville.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Marguerite [Goodrich]. 1988. Fossilization and an emerging social dialect. Lenguas Modernas 15: 115–24.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Marguerite [Goodrich]. 1990. Sociolinguistic variation and the multidimensional model of acculturation. Romance Languages Annual 1: 677–81.Google Scholar
Major, Roy C. 2004. Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology. Language Variation and Change 16: 169–88.Google Scholar
Mansfield, John Basil. 2015. Consonant lenition as a sociophonetic variable in Murrinh Patha (Australia). Language Variation and Change 27: 203–25.Google Scholar
Mapping the Nation’s Latino Population by State, County, and City: Hispanic Trends. 2017. Pew Research Foundation.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Corrine. 2011. The Northern Cities Shift in Chicago. Journal of English Linguistics 39: 166–87.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. Jr., and McDavid, Virginia Glenn. 1952. H before semivowels in the eastern United States. Language 28: 41–62.Google Scholar
McDowell, John, and McRae, Susan. 1972. Differential response of the class and ethnic components of the Austin speech community. Anthropological Linguistics 14: 228–39.Google Scholar
McGee, Victoria. 2010. Ethnic identity, language, and/o/fronting among Latinos at UNC Chapel Hill. M.A. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason. 2018. African American language and European American English intonation variation over time in the American South. American Speech 93: 32–78.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason, Kendal, Tyler, and Farrington, Charlie. 2016. Investigating the development of the contemporary Oregonian English vowel system. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy, and Wassink, Alicia Beckford (eds.), Speech in the Western States. Vol. 1: The Coastal States, 135–57. Publication of the American Dialect Society 101. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mehler, Jacques, Jusczyk, Peter, Lambertz, Ghislaine, Halsted, Nilofar, Bertoncini, Josiane, and Amiel-Tison, Claudine. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29(2), 143–178.Google Scholar
Melendez, Mildred Gonzales. 1982. Phonological variation in the English speech of northern New Mexico bilinguals. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Méndez, Luis Alberto. 2017. The variant [ʃ] in the Spanish of Ciudad Juárez. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 6: 243–60.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 1997. Chicana/Mexicana identity of linguistic variation: An ethnographic and sociolinguistic study of gang affiliation in an urban high school. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. New directions in ethnography 2. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma, and Iwai, Melissa. 1993. “They speak more Caucasian”: Generational differences in the speech of Japanese-Americans. In Queen, Robin and Barrett, Rusty (eds.), SALSA I: Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium about Language and Society–Austin, 58–67. Texas Linguistic Forum 33. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Merrill, Celia Dale. 1987. Mexican-American English in McAllen, Texas: Features of accentedness in the English of native Spanish bilinguals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1996. Language contact, transmission, shift: South African Indian English. In de Klerk, Vivian (ed.), Focus on South Africa, 79–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2002. From second language to first language: Indian South African English. In Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Language in South Africa, 339–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, ed. 2008. Varieties of English 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2010. Socio-phonetics and social change: Deracialisation of the goose vowel in South African English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 3–33.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2012. Ethnicity, substrate and place: The dynamics of Coloured and Indian English in five South African cities in relation to the variable (t). Language Variation and Change 24: 371–95.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan A. 1972a. Directions of change in southern California English. Journal of English Linguistics 6: 28–34.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan A. 1972b. Mexican-American English in southern California. Western Review 9: 13–21.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan A. 1974. The study (or, non-study) of California Chicano English. In Bills, Garland D. (ed.), Southwest Areal Linguistics, 97–106. San Diego: Institute for Cultural Pluralism, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan A. 1979. Chicano English. Language in education: Theory and practice 21. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Schleef, Erik. 2012. Variation, contact and social indexicality in the acquisition of (ing) by teenage migrants. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 398–416.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim. 2008. Final nasal variation in Merida, Yucatan. Spanish in Context 5: 278–303.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim. 2009. Intervocalic voiced stops in Yucatan Spanish: A case of contact-induced language change? In Lacorte, Manuel and Leeman, Jennifer (eds.), Español en Estados Unidos en Otros Contextos de Contacto: Sociolinguistica, ideologia y pedgogia/ Spanish in the United States and Other Contact Environments: Sociolinguistics, Ideology and Pedagogy, 67–84. Lengua y sociedad en el mundo hispánico/ Language and Society in the Hispanic World 21. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim. 2011. Dialect standardization in Merida, Yucatan: The case of /bdg/. Revista Internacional de Lingüistica Iberoamericano 18: 191–212.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim. 2012. The standardization of Yucatan Spanish: Family case studies in Izamal and Mérida. In Geeslin, Kimberly and Díaz-Campos, Manuel (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 102–115. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim, and Barnes, Hilary. 2013. A sociolinguistic analysis of pre-nuclear peak alignment in Yucatan Spanish. In Howe, Chad et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 221–35. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim, and Carpenter, Lindsay. 2013. Voiceless stop aspiration in Yucatan Spanish. Spanish in Context 10: 410–37.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim, and Kagan, Laura. 2016. On glottal stops in Yucatan Spanish. In Sessarego, Sandro and Tejedo, Fernando (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 219–39.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 1984. On the perception of rhythm. Journal of Phonetics 19: 231–48.Google Scholar
Mills, Carl. 1980. The sociolinguistics of the [a]-[ɒ] merger in Pacific Northwest English: A subjective reaction test. Papers in Linguistics 13: 345–88.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, Kuniko, Strange, Winifred, Verbrugge, Robert, Liberman, Alvin M., Jenkins, James J., and Fujimura, Osamu. 1975. An effect of language experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics 18: 331–40.Google Scholar
Moreno de Alba, José G. 1994. La pronunciación del español en México. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Rehner, Katherine, and Nadasdi, Terry. 2004. The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 408–32.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Blondeau, Hélène, and Auger, Julie. 2003. Second language acquisition and “real” French: An investigation of subject doubling in the French of Montreal Anglophones. Language Variation and Change 15: 73–103.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Chociej, Joanna, and Hoffman, Michol F.. 2014. Analyzing ethnic orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language & Communication 35: 9–26.Google Scholar
Natalicio, Diana S., and Williams, Frederick. 1972. What characteristics can “experts” reliably evaluate in the speech of Black and Mexican-American children? TESOL Quarterly 6: 121–27.Google Scholar
Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza. 2014. From interference to transfer in language contact: Variation in voice onset time. Language Variation and Change 26: 359–85.Google Scholar
Newman, Michael. 2010. Focusing, implicational scaling, and the dialect status of New York Latino English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 207–39.Google Scholar
Norman, Arthur M. Z. 1956. A southeast Texas dialect survey. Orbis 5: 61–79.Google Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine, and Dorleijn, Margreet. 2008. A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 125–42.Google Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine, and Dorleijn, Margreet. 2013. Multi-ethnolects: Kebabnorsk, Perkerdansk, Verlan, Kanakensprache, Straattaal, etc. In Bakker, Peter and Matras, Yaron (eds.), Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide, 229–71. Language contact and bilingualism 6. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine, and Svendsen, Bente A., eds. 2015. Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ocumpaugh, Jaclyn Lorraine. 2010. Regional variation in Chicano English: Incipient dialect formation among L1 and L2 speakers in Benton Harbor, MI. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Ocumpaugh, Jaclyn, and Roeder, Rebecca. 2006–07. Mexican American English in context: Accommodation to other available norms in lower Michigan. Linguistica Atlantica 27–28: 71–75.Google Scholar
Ogechi, Nathan Oyori. 2005. On lexicalization in Sheng. Nordic Journal of African Studies 14: 334–55.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A., and Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior. Chicago Linguistic Society, May 1–2, 1981, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Onysko, Alexander. 2016. Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact. World Englishes 35: 196–220.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Jacob L. 1974. Mexican American sociolinguistics: A well-kept scholarly and public secret. In Hoffer, Bates and Ornstein, Jacob L. (eds.), Sociolinguistics in the Southwest, 91–121. San Antonio: Trinity University.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Jacob L. 1975. Sociolinguistics and the study of Spanish and English language varieties and their use in the U.S. Southwest (with a proposed plan of research). In Ornstein, Jacob (ed.), Three Essays on Linguistic Diversity in the Spanish-Speaking World (the U.S. Southwest and the River Plate Area), 9–45. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob, ed. 1984. Form and Function in Chicano English. Rowley, MA: Newberry.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Erin. 2012. The realization of contrastive focus in Peruvian Spanish intonation. Lingua 122: 494–510.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Erin. 2014. Intonation in Spanish. In Hualde, José Ignacio, Olarrea, Antxon, and O’Rourke, Erin (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, 173–91. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ortega, Phillip Darraugh. 1969. Some cultural implications of a Mexican American border dialect of American English. Studies in Linguistics 21: 77–84.Google Scholar
Oxley, Judith, Buckingham, Hugh, Roussel, Nancy, and Daniloff, Raymond. 2006. Metrical/syllabic factors in English allophony: Dark /l/. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 20: 109–117.Google Scholar
Paddock, Harold. 1981. A Dialect Survey of Carbonear, Newfoundland. Publication of the American Dialect Society 68. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 1991. Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t,d deletion and past marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3: 171–190.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 1999. Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the Mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee A., McDaniel, Susan Leas, Bailey, Guy, Basset, Marvin H., Adams, Carol M., Liao, Caisheng, and Montgomery, Michael B., eds. 1986–92. The Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States. 7 vols. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Pellowe, John, and Jones, Val. 1978. On intonational variability in Tyneside speech. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British Speech, 101–21. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Peñalosa, Fernando. 1980. Chicano Sociolinguistics: A Brief Introduction. Rowley, MA: Newberry.Google Scholar
Peñalosa, Fernando. 1981a. Introduction to the sociology of language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Peñalosa, Fernando. 1981b. Some issues in Chicano sociolinguistics. In Durán, Richard P. (ed.), Latino Language and Communicative Behavior, 3–18. Advances in discourse processes 6. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce. 1984. Some hypotheses and generalizations about intonation in Chicano English. In Ornstein-Galicia (ed.), 49–59.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce, and Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob L.. 1985. Chicano English: An Ethnic Contact Dialect. Varieties of English around the world 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E., and Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 693–703.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. 1981. Lexical diffusion and Southern tune, duke, news. American Speech 56: 72–78.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. 1994. Southern English glide deletion revisited. American Speech 69: 115–27.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pitts, Ann. 1986. Flip-flop prestige in American tune, duke, news. American Speech 61: 130–38.Google Scholar
Podberesky, Rosita, Deluty, Robert H., and Feldstein, Stanley. 1990. Evaluations of Spanish- and Oriental-accented English applicants. Social Behavior and Personality 18: 53–63.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., D’Onofrio, Annette, Van Hofwegen, Janneke, and Kim, Seung Kyung. 2015. Country ideology and the California vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 27: 157–86.Google Scholar
Politzer, Robert, and Ramirez, Arnulfo. 1973. An Error Analysis of the Spoken English of Mexican-American Pupils in a Bilingual School and a Monolingual School. Research and development memorandum #103. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Research and Teaching.Google Scholar
Pooley, Tim. 2006. On the geographical spread of Oïl French in France. French Language Studies 16: 357–90.Google Scholar
Pooley, Tim. 2009. The immigrant factor in phonological leveling. In Beeching, Kate, Armstrong, Nigel, and Gadet, François (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French, 63–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1978. Dialect acquisition among Puerto Rican bilinguals. Language in Society 7: 89–103.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, van Santen, Jan, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1995. Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 23: 429–51.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas C. 2010. Phonetic detail in the perception of ethnic varieties of US English. In Preston, Dennis R. and Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 289–326. Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs 219. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William, and Baugh, John. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18: 10–30.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas C., Salmons, Joseph, and Tepeli, Dilara. 2005a. German substrate effects in Wisconsin English: Evidence for final fortition. American Speech 80: 135–64.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas C., Salmons, Joseph, Tepeli, Dilara, and Mercer, Jennifer. 2005b. Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper Midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English Linguistics 33: 307–38.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin M. 2001. Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society 30: 55–80.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin M. 2012. Turkish-German bilinguals and their intonation: Triangulating evidence about contact-induced language change. Language 88: 791–816.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2008. Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 43–61.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, Nespor, Marina, and Mehler, Jacques. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73: 265–92.Google Scholar
Rankinen, Wil. 2014. The Michigan Upper Peninsula English vowel system in Finnish American communities in Marquette County. American Speech 89: 312–47.Google Scholar
Rankinen, Wil. 2018. Lingering substrate and encroaching exogenous influences on Finnish and Italian Americans’ vowels in Michigan’s Marquette County. American Speech 93: 223–69.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2004. Darkness in [l] as a scalar phonetic property: Implications for phonology and articulatory control. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 18: 593–603.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, and Epinosa, Aina. 2005. Articulatory, positional, and coarticulatory characteristics for clear /l/ and dark /l/: Evidence from two Catalan dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35: 1–26.Google Scholar
Reed, Paul. 2016. Sounding Appalachian: /aI/ Monophthongization, Rising Pitch Accents, and Rootedness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Regan, Vera. 1996. Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis (eds.), Studies in Bilingualism: Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation, 177–201. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Register, Norma A. 1977. Some sound patterns of Chicano English. Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest 2: 111–22.Google Scholar
Rey, Alberto. 1977. Accent and employability: Language attitudes. Language Sciences 47: 7–12.Google Scholar
Rindal, Ulrikke. 2010. Constructing identity with L2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 240–61.Google Scholar
Roeder, Rebecca. 2010a. Effects of consonantal context on the pronunciation of /æ/ in the English of speakers of Mexican heritage from south central Michigan. In Preston, Dennis R. and Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 71–89. Trends in linguistics, studies and monographs 219. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roeder, Rebecca. 2010b. Northern cities Mexican American English: Vowel production and perception. American Speech 85: 163–84.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1973. Subjective reactions toward accented speech. In Shuy, Roger W. and Fasold, Ralph (eds.), Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects, 60–73. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1977a. Ingroup and outgroup reactions to Mexican American language varieties. In Giles, Howard (ed.), Language, Ethnicity, and Intergroup Relations, 59–82. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1977b. Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech 20: 267–73.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, and Carranza, Miguel. 1975. Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican-American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 855–63.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, and Carranza, Miguel A.. 1977. Ingroup and outgroup reactions to Mexican American language varieties. In Giles, Howard (ed.), Language, Ethnicity, and Intergroup Relations, 59–82. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, Carranza, Miguel A., and Moffie, Robert W.. 1977. Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech 20: 267–73.Google Scholar
Sadowsky, Scott. 2015. Variación sociofonética de las consonants del castellano chileno [Sociophonetic variation in Chilean Spanish consonants]. Sociolinguistic Studies 9: 71–92.Google Scholar
Sadowsky, Scott, and Aninao, Maria José. 2019. Santiago, Chile: Globalization, internal migration and ethnicity. In Lynch, Andrew (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish in the Global City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, and Smith, Eric. 2005. Goldvarb X: A Variable Rule Application for Macintosh and Windows. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Thibault, Pierette, Nagy, Naomi, Blondeau, Hélène, Fonollosa, Marie-Odile, and Gagnon, Lucie. 1997. Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change 9: 191–217.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1991. Phonetic simplification processes in the English of the barrio: A cross-generational study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1992. Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 4: 275–89.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1993. Chicano English and the nature of the Chicano language setting. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15: 3–35.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1996. Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change 8: 63–89.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto, and Bayley, Robert. 2008. Chicano English: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English 2. The Americas and the Caribbean, 219–38. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Janet Beck Moseley. 1957. A dialect study of San Antonio, Texas, a bilingual community. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Janet B. 1959. Aloofness from Spanish influence in Texas English. Word 15: 270–81.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Janet B. 1964. Social aspects of bilingualism in San Antonio, Texas. Publication of the American Dialect Society 41: 7–15.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Janet B. 1970. Spanish-English bilingualism in San Antonio, Texas. In Gilbert, Glenn G. (ed.), Texas Studies in Bilingualism; Spanish, French, German, Czech, Polish, Sorbian, and Norwegian in the Southwest, with a Concluding Chapter on Code-switching and Modes of Speaking in American Swedish, 18–51. Studia linguistia germanica 3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Language 57: 45–62.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik. 2013. Migrant teenagers’ acquisition of sociolinguistic variation: The variables (ing) and (t). In Auer, Peter et al. (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives IV: Selected Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 6), Freiburg, June 2011, 201–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Clark, Lynn. 2011. Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-Wide 32: 206–36.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1982. Quoting with go “say.” American Speech 57: 147–48.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003a. Isolation and Language Change: Sociohistorical and Contemporary Evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003b. Convergence and language shift in New Zealand: Consonant cluster reduction in 19th century Maori English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 378–91.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2005. Consonant Change in English Worldwide: Synchrony Meets Diachrony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2006. The backyard as a dialect boundary: Individuation, linguistic heterogeneity, and sociolinguistic eccentricity in a small speech community. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 26–57.Google Scholar
Schumann, John. 1978. The Pidginization Process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Richard J., and Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1985. Speech cues and social evaluation: Markers of ethnicity, social class, and age. In Giles, Howard and St. Clair, Robert N. (eds.), Recent Advances in Language, Communication, and Social Psychology, 112–43. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–31.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2011. Prosody and unit-construction in an ethnic style: The case of Turkish German and its use and function in conversation. In Kern and Selting (eds.), 131–59.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2005. Dialect stabilization and speaker awareness in non-native varieties of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9: 194–224.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 464–92.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani, and Sankaran, Lavanya. 2011. Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23: 399–428.Google Scholar
Shiels, Marie. 1972. Dialects in contact: A sociolinguistic analysis of four phonological variables of Puerto Rican English and Black English in Harlem. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W., Wolfram, Walt, and Riley, William K.. 1967. Linguistic Correlates of Social Stratification in Detroit Speech. Cooperative Research Project No. 6–1347. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Silverman, Stuart H. 1971. The effects of peer group membership on Puerto Rican English. Ph.D. dissertation, Yeshiva University.Google Scholar
Singler, John Victor. 2001. Why you can’t do a VARBRUL analysis of quotatives and what such a study can show us. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 257–78.Google Scholar
Slomanson, Peter, and Newman, Michael. 2004. Peer group identification and variation in New York Latino English laterals. English World-Wide 25: 199–216.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard, & Fujimura, Osamu. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21: 291–311.Google Scholar
Stanley, Oma. 1936. The speech of east Texas. American Speech 11: 1–36, 145–66, 232–55, 327–55.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Timmins, Claire, and Alam, Farhana. 2011. Hybridity and ethnic accents: A sociophonetic analysis of “Glaswasian.” In Gregerson, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey K., and Quist, Pia (eds.), Language Variation: European Perspectives III. Selected Papers from the 5th International Converence on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 5), Copenhagen, June, 2009, 43–57. Studies in language variation 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin, and Unn, Røyneland. 2008. Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 63–83.Google Scholar
Szakay, Anita. 2008. Ethnic Dialect Identification in New Zealand: The Role of Prosodic Cues. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2004. Somethi[ŋ]’s goi[n] on!: Variable (ing) at ground zero. In Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise, Bergström, Lena, Eklund, Gerd, Fidell, Steffan, Hansen, Lise H., Karstadt, Angela, Nordberg, Bengt, Sundergren, Eva, and Thelander, Mats (eds.), Language Variation in Europe: Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2, 390–403. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. He’s like, She’s like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 493–514.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19: 199–217.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85: 58–108.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Hudson, Rachel. 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 147–72.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Temple, Rosalind. 2005. New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17: 281–302.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2016. Persistence in phonological and morphological variation. Language Variation and Change 28: 335–356.Google Scholar
Tan, Rachel Siew Kuang, and Low, Ee-Ling. 2010. How different are the monophthongs of Malay speakers of Malaysian and Singapore English? English World-Wide 31: 162–89.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech, 311–32. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine E. 1973. Aspects of intonation in Black English. American Speech 48: 29–36.Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine E. 1979. Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning 29.1: 181–91.Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine. 1980. Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 130–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, William C. 1997. Rule ordering in the phonology of Alabama-Georgia consonants. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Thomas, and Sabino, Robin (eds.), Language Variety in the South Revisited, 210–18. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Teschner, Richard V., Bills, Garland D., and Craddock, Jerry R., eds. 1975. Spanish and English of United States Hispanos: A Critical, Annotated, Linguistic Bibliography. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Texas State Historical Association. n.d. https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles. Accessed 16 January 2018.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 1993. Why we need descriptive studies: Phonological variables in Hispanic English. In Queen, Robin and Barrett, Rusty (eds.), SALSA I (Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium about Language and Society—Austin), 42–49. Texas Linguistic Forum 33. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 1997. A rural/metropolitan split in the speech of Texas Anglos. Language Variation and Change 9: 309–32.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2000. Spectral differences in /ai/ offsets conditioned by voicing of the following consonant. Journal of Phonetics 28: 1–25.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2001. An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 85. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2002. Sociophonetic Applications of Speech Perception Experiments. American Speech 77: 115–47.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2005. Rural white Southern accents. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English: The Americas/Caribbean, 87–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2007. Phonological and phonetic characteristics of African American Vernacular English. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 450–75.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2010. A longitudinal analysis of the durability of the Northern/Midland dialect boundary in Ohio. American Speech 85: 375–430.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2015. Prosodic features of African American English. In Lanehart, Sonja L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 420–35. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik, and Bailey, Guy. 2015. Segmental phonology of African American English. In Lanehart, Sonja L., Green, Lisa, and Bloomquist, Jennifer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. 403–19. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik, and Carter, Phillip M.. 2006. Prosodic rhythm and African American English. English World-Wide 27: 331–55.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Roger M. 1975. Mexican-American English: Social correlates of regional pronunciation. American Speech 50: 18–24.Google Scholar
Tillery, Jan, Bailey, Guy, and Wikle, Tom. 2004. Demographic change and American dialectology in the twenty-first century. American Speech 79: 227–49.Google Scholar
Torbert, Benjamin. 2001. Tracing Native American language history through consonant cluster reduction: The case of Lumbee English. American Speech 76: 361–87.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind Nessa, and Szakay, Anita. 2012. An investigation of speech rhythm in London English. Lingua 12: 822–40.Google Scholar
Torres, Lourdes. 1997. Puerto Rican Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Study of New York Suburbs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trager, George L., and Smith, Henry Lee. 1951. An Outline of English Structure. Norman, OK: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–96.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Language in Society 10. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice, and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35: 445–72.Google Scholar
Turney, Douglas. 1929. The Mexican accent. American Speech 4: 434–39.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. n.d. www.census.gov/. Accessed 13 and 17 January 2018.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft, Band 19. Heidelburg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard, Childs, Becky, and Thorburn, Jennifer. 2009. Identity marking and affiliation in an urbanizing Newfoundland community. In Cichocki, Wladyslaw (ed.), Papers from the 31st Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association / Actes du 31e colloque annuel de l’Association de Linguistique des Provinces Atlantiques, 85–94. Fredericton: University of New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2009. Cross-generational change in /l/ in Chicano English. English World-Wide 30: 302–25.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke, and Wolfram, Walt. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 427–55.Google Scholar
Vásquez, Manuel A., Seales, Chad E., and Marquardt, Marie Friedmann. 2008. New Latino Destinations. In Rodriguez, Havidan, Saenz, Rogelio, Menjivar, Cecilia, Rodriguez, Clara E., and Massey, Douglas S. (eds.), Latinas/os in the United States: Changing the Face of America, 19–35. New York: Springer US.Google Scholar
Veatch, Thomas Clark. 1991. English vowels: Their surface phonology and phonetic implementation in vernacular dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
del Vecchio, Ann, and Guerrero, Michael. 1995. Handbook of English language Proficiency Tests. Albuquerque: New Mexico Highlands University.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2012. Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24: 179–202.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji. 1981. Limitations on the application of the variable rule to bilingual phonology: The unmerging of the voiceless palatal phonemes in the English of Mexican Americans in the Los Angeles area. In Sankoff, David and Cedergren, Henrietta (eds.), Variation Omnibus, 218–26. Current Inquiry into Language, Linguistics and Human Communication 40. Carbondale, IL/ Edmonton, AB: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji. 1984. The status of Chicano English as a dialect of American English. In Ornstein-Galicia (ed.), 14–31.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji. 1987. Spanish-English grammatical contact in Los Angeles: The grammar of reported speech in the East Los Angeles contact vernacular. Linguistics 25: 53–80.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji. 1996. Substratal effects on the evolution of modals in East LA English. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renée, Davidson, Brad, Schwenter, Scott, and Solomon, Julie (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, 515–30. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji, and Shopen, Timothy. 1981. A researcher’s guide to the sociolinguistic variable (ING). In Shopen, Timothy and Williams, Joseph M. (eds.), Style and Variables in English, 219–49. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
Walker, James. 2013. Ethnolects at the intersection of phonological variables: Velar nasals in Toronto. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of American Annual Meeting. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Walker, James. 2017. Intersect(ING) variables. Paper presented at the International Conference on Methods in Dialectology XVI, Tachikawa, Japan, 11 August.Google Scholar
Walsh, Harry, and Mote, Victor L.. 1974. A Texas dialect feature. American Speech 49:40–53.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford. 2016. The vowels of Washington State. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy, and Wassink, Alicia Beckford (eds.), Speech in the Western States. Vol. 1: The Coastal States, 77–105. Publication of the American Dialect Society 101. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 1. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winifred P. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 97–105. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, Tracey. 1994. Variability in negation in African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 6: 359–97.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wetmore, Thomas H. 1959. The Low-Central and Low-Back Vowels in the English of the Eastern United States. Publication of the American Dialect Society 32. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
White, Laurence, and Mattys, Sven L.. 2007. Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages. In Prieto, Pilar, Mascaró, Joan, and Solé, Maria-Josep (eds.), Segmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology, 237–57. Current issues in linguistic theory series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, and Chang, Winston. 2013. An Implementation of the Grammar of Graphics. R package version.Google Scholar
Wiebesiek, Lisa, Rudwick, Stephanie, and Zeller, Jochen. 2011. South African English: A qualitative study of attitudes. World Englishes 30: 251–68.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Miranda E., Livengood, Mark, and Salmons, Joe. 2014. The sociohistorical context of imposition in substrate effects: German-sourced features in Wisconsin English. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 284–306.Google Scholar
Willis, Erik W. 2005. An initial examination of Southwest Spanish vowels. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 24: 185–98.Google Scholar
Willis, Erik W. 2008. Tonal characteristics of pronominal interrogatives in Puebla Mexico Spanish. In Herrera Z., Esther and Butragueño, Pedro Martín (eds.), Fonología Instrumental: Patrones Fónicos y Variación, 357–76. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Lingüisticos y Literarios, Laboratorio de Estudios Fónicos.Google Scholar
Willis, Erik W. 2010. Dominican Spanish intonation. In Prieto, Pilar and Roseano, Paolo (eds.), Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, 123–53. Munich: Lincom GmbH.Google Scholar
Winter, Joanne. 2002. Discourse narratives in Australian English: Adolescents performing voices. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22: 5–21.Google Scholar
Wölck, Wolfgang. 1989. The linguistic resolution of urban ethnic conflict. Plurilingua 7: 21–29.Google Scholar
Wölck, Wolfgang. 2002. Ethnolects –Between bilingualism and urban dialect. In Wei, Li, Dewaele, Jean-Marc, and Housen, Alex (eds.), Opportunities and Challenges of Bilingualism: Contributions to the Sociology of Language, vol. 87, 157–70. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wolford, Tonya, and Carter, Phillip M.. 2010. The “Spanish as threat” Ideology and Cultural Aspects of Spanish Attrition. In Rivera-Mills, Susana and Villa, Daniel (eds.), Spanish in the U.S. Southwest: A Language in Transition, 111–131. Madrid: Iberoamericana/ Vervuert.Google Scholar
Wolford, Tonya, and Evanini, Keelan. 2006. Features of AAVE as features of PRE: A study of adolescents in Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 231–44.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1971. Overlapping Influence in the English of Second Generation Puerto Rican Teenagers in Harlem. Final report, Office of Education Grant No. 3–70-0033. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1972. Overlapping influence and linguistic assimilation in second generation Puerto Rican English. In Smith, David M. and Shuy, Roger W. (eds.), Sociolinguistics in Cross-Cultural Analysis, 15–46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1974. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Assimilation: Puerto English in New York City. Urban language series 9. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1984. Unmarked tense in American Indian English. American Speech 59: 31–50.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1985. Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning 35: 229–53.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1980. Dynamic dimensions of language influence: The case of American Indian English. In Giles, Howard, Robinson, W. Peter, and Smith, Phillip M. (eds.), Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, 1st edn., 377–88. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2007. Sociolinguistic folklore in the study of African American English. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 292–313.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Carter, Phillip, and Moriello, Beckie. 2004. Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 339–58.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Childs, Becky, and Torbert, Benjamin. 2000. Tracing language history through consonant cluster reduction: Comparative evidence from isolated dialects. Southern Journal of Linguistics 24: 17–40.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. 1976. Appalachian Speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Christian, Donna, and Hatfield, Deborah. 1983. Adolescent and young adult English of Vietnamese refugees 262. NIE Final Report G‑81‑0122.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Fasold, Ralph. 1974. The Study of Social Dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Hatfield, Deborah. 1984. Tense Marking in Second Language Learning: Patterns of Spoken and Written English in a Vietnamese Community. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Hatfield, Deborah. 1986. Interlanguage fads and linguistic reality: The case of tense marking. In Tannen, Deborah and Alatis, James E. (eds.), GURT ’85, 17–34. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Schilling, Natalie. 2016. American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Thomas, Erik R.. 2002. The Development of African American English. Language in Society 31. Oxford, UK/ Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1979. The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55: 168–82.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1982. On tense alternation and the need for analysis of native speaker usage in second language acquisition. Language Learning 32: 53–68.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy. 2007. Two vernacular features in the English of four American-born Chinese in New York City. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13.2: 217–30.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy Wing-Mei, and Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2014. Regional variability and ethnic identity: Chinese-Americans in New York City and San Francisco. Language & Communication 35: 27–42.Google Scholar
Wood, Frances Cox. 1953. Using the social and historical heritage of North Town, Texas, in teaching fourth grade children. M.A. thesis, Southwest Texas State Teachers College [now Texas State University].Google Scholar
Woods, Howard B. 1991. Social differentiation in Ottawa English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 134–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wormald, Jessica. 2015. Dynamic variation in “Panjabi-English”: Analysis of F1 & F2 trajectories for face /eɪ/ and goat /əʊ/. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0328.pdf.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, and Thomas, Erik R.. 2010. African American English Speakers and Their Participation in Local Sound Changes: A Comparative Study. Publication of the American Dialect Society 94. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, Reiko A. 1995. Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /ɹ/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, 305–20. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Flege, James Emil, and Liu, Serena. 2000. Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 3: 131–49.Google Scholar
Yule, George, and Mathis, Terrie. 1992. The role of staging and constructed dialogue in establishing speaker’s topic. Linguistics 30: 199–215.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia. 1997. Growing up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Victor, and Hernández-León, Rubén (eds.). 2005. New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Erik R. Thomas, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Mexican American English
  • Online publication: 21 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162316.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Erik R. Thomas, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Mexican American English
  • Online publication: 21 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162316.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Erik R. Thomas, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Mexican American English
  • Online publication: 21 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162316.013
Available formats
×