Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:20:28.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 2 - Individual Differences across Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Edited by
Michael Bender  and
Byron G. Adams
Michael Bender
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Byron G. Adams
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Methods and Assessment in Culture and Psychology , pp. 101 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29, 229–246.Google Scholar
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F.J. R., & Yagmur, K. (2018). Propensity score matching helps to understand sources of DIF and mathematics performance differences of Indonesian, Turkish, Australian, and Dutch students in PISA. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4, 69–81.Google Scholar
Austin, B., Adesope, O. O., French, B. F., Gotch, C., Bélanger, J., & Kubacka, K. (2015). Examining School Context and Its Influence on Teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Benítez, I., He, J., van de Vijver, A. J. R., & Padilla, J. L. (2016). Linking extreme response styles to response processes: A cross-cultural mixed methods approach. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 464–473.Google Scholar
Benítez, I., & Padilla, J. L. (2014). Analysis of nonequivalent assessments across different linguistic groups using a mixed methods approach: Understanding the causes of differential item functioning by cognitive interviewing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8, 52–68.Google Scholar
Benítez, I., Padilla, J. L., Hidalgo, M. D., & Sireci, S.G. (2016). Using mixed methods to interpret differential item functioning. Applied Measurement in Education, 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
Benítez, I., Padilla, J. L., van de Vijver, J. R., & Cuevas, A. (2008). What cognitive interviews tell us about bias when measuring quality-of-life. Field Methods, 30, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, K., Lietz, P., Schreier, M., & Wilhelm, A. (2011). Sampling: The selection of cases for culturally comparative psychological research. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 101–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 713–734.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. (1973). Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T., van de Vijver, F. J., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., & Bartram, D. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 94.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.Google Scholar
Cees, G., & Khurrem, J. (2014). Modeling country-specific differential item functioning. In Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (eds.), Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment (pp. 97–115). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.Google Scholar
Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (eds.) (2012). The European Second Generation Compared: Does the Integration Context Matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2014). Language and identity in multilingual schools: Constructing evidence based instructional policies. In Little, D., Leung, C., & van Avermaet, P. (eds.), Managing Diversity in Education: Languages, Policies, Pedagogies (pp. 3–26). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dagevos, J., Gijsberts, M., & van Praag, C. (2003). Rapportage minderheden 2003. Onderwijs, arbeid en sociaal-culturele integratie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Driessen, G., & Merry, M. S. (2011). The effects of integration and generation of immigrants on language and numeracy achievement. Educational Studies, 37, 581–592.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237–251.Google Scholar
Elosua, P., & López-Jaúregui, A. (2007). Potential sources of differential item functioning in the adaptation of tests. International Journal of Testing, 7, 39–52.Google Scholar
Ercikan, K., & Koh, K. (2005). Examining the construct comparability of the English and French versions of TIMSS. International Journal of Testing, 5, 23–35.Google Scholar
Euromosaic (1996). The Production and Reproduction of the Minority Language Groups in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Extra, G., & Yagmur, K. (2010). Language proficiency and socio-cultural orientation of Turkish and Moroccan youngsters in the Netherlands. Language and Education, 24, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., Buchholz, J., & Klieme, E. (2017). Effects of anchoring vignettes on comparability and predictive validity of student self-reports in 64 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 319–334.Google Scholar
He, J., & Kubacka, K. (2015). Data comparability in the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2008 and 2013. OECD Education Working Paper Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010). Improving anchoring vignettes: Designing surveys to correct interpersonal incomparability. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 201–222.Google Scholar
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Filial piety in Japan and China. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2, 67–74.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Wilson, M., & Wang, L. (2016). Exploring plausible causes of differential item functioning in the PISA science assessment: Language, curriculum or culture. Educational Psychology, 36, 378–390.Google Scholar
Jungbluth, P. (2003). De ongelijke basisschool: etniciteit, sociaal milieu, sekse, verborgen differentiatie, segregatie, onderwijskansen en schooleffectiviteit. Nijmegen: ITS.Google Scholar
Kankaraš, M., & Moors, G. (2014). Analysis of cross-cultural comparability of PISA 2009 scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 381–399.Google Scholar
Klieme, E., & Baumert, J. (2001). Identifying national cultures of mathematics education: Analysis of cognitive demands and differential item functioning in TIMSS. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 385.Google Scholar
Klieme, E., & Kuger, S. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Questionnaire Framework. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Kuger, S., Klieme, E., Jude, N., & Kaplan, D. (eds.). (2016). Assessing Contexts of Learning: An International Perspective. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., & Bertling, J. J. (2014). Innovative questionnaire assessment methods to increase cross-country comparability. In Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (eds.), Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis (pp. 277–286). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Leseman, P. (2000). Bilingual vocabulary development of Turkish preschoolers in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21, 93–112,Google Scholar
Leseman, P. P. M., & van den Boom, D. C. (1999). Effects of quantity and quality of home proximal processes on Dutch, Surinamese-Dutch, and Turkish-Dutch preschoolers’ cognitive development. Infant and Child Development, 8, 19–38.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Zumbo, B. D., Gustafson, P., Huang, Y., Kroc, E., & Wu, A. D. (2016). Investigating causal DIF via propensity score methods. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 21, 24.Google Scholar
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2011). Multilingualism in education: A poststructuralist critique. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 430–441.Google Scholar
Merenda, P. F. (2005). Cross-cultural adaptation of educational and psychological testing. In Hambleton, R., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C.D. (eds.), Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment (pp. 321–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Morren, M., Gelissen, J. P., & Vermunt, J. K. (2012). Response strategies and response styles in cross-cultural surveys. Cross-Cultural Research, 46, 255–279.Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (eds.). (2013). TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38.Google Scholar
OECD. (2010). TALIS 2008 Technical Report. Paris: OCED Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Padilla, J. L., Benitez, I., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2018). Addressing equivalence and bias in cross-cultural survey research within a mixed methods framework. In Johnson, T. P., Pennell, B., Stoop, I., & Dorer, B. (eds.), Advances in Comparative Survey Methods: Multinational, Multiregional and Multicultural Contexts (3MC) (pp. 45–64). New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H., Sha, M. M., & Pan, Y. (2014). Investigating validity and effectiveness of cognitive interviewing as a pretesting method for non-English questionnaires: Findings from Korean cognitive interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17, 643–658.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response biases. In Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (vol. 1, pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In Kagitcibasi, C. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 22–34). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31–57.Google Scholar
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 117–140.Google Scholar
Schilt-Mol, T. (2007). Differential item functioning en itembias in de Cito-Eindtoets Basisonderwijs. (Studies in Multilingualism, No. 7.) Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
Schuelka, M. J. (2013). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 216–230.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., Kozminsky, E., & Leikin, M. (2009). Socio-linguistic factors in second language lexical knowledge: the case of second-generation children of Russian-Jewish immigrants in Israel. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 22, 15–28.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural research. In Gelfand, M., Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (eds.), Handbook of Advances in Culture & Psychology (vol. 5, pp. 101–160). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & He, J. (2016). Bias assessment and prevention in noncognitive outcome measures in context assessments. In Kuger, S., Klieme, E., Jude, N., & Kaplan, D. (eds.), Assessing Contexts of Learning: An International Perspective (pp. 229–253). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis of Comparative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, I. (2001). Successful Turkish and Morocaan students in the Netherlands. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. T. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313–30.Google Scholar
von Davier, M., Shin, H.-J., Khorramdel, L., & Stankov, L. (2017). The effects of vignette scoring on reliability and validity of self-reports. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 291–306.Google Scholar
Yagmur, K. (2017) Multilingualism in Immigrant Communities. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D., & May, S. (eds.), Language Awareness and Multilingualism. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling as a Unitary Framework for Binary and Likert-Type (Ordinal) Item Scores. Ottawa: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.Google Scholar

References

Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Pelletier, J., & Ferrell, J. M. (2009). Children’s group nous: Understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups. Child Development, 80, 224–243.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, A. J. R., & Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29, 229–246.Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49.Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. (2009). Diversity and citizenship education in multicultural nations. Multicultural Education Review, 1, 1–28.Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural Diversity and Education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Is there really a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index. Comparative European Politics, 11, 577–598.Google Scholar
Baysu, G., Celeste, L., Brown, R., Verschueren, K., & Phalet, K. (2016). Minority adolescents in ethnically diverse schools: Perceptions of equal treatment buffer threat effects. Child Development, 87, 1352–1366.Google Scholar
Beelmann, A., Heinemann, K. S., & Saur, M. (2009). Interventionen zur Prävention von Vorurteilen und Diskriminierung [Interventions for the prevention of prejudice and discrimination]. In Beelmann, A. & Jonas, K. (eds.), Diskriminierung und Toleranz. Psychologische Grundlagen und Anwendungsperspektiven (pp. 435–461). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology – An International Review, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166.Google Scholar
Brenick, A., Titzmann, P. F., Michel, A., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2012). Perceptions of discrimination by young diaspora migrants. European Psychologist, 17, 105–119.Google Scholar
Byrd, C. M. (2015). The associations of intergroup interactions and school racial socialization with academic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 10–21.Google Scholar
Byrd, C. M. (2017). The complexity of school racial climate: Reliability and validity of a new measure for secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 700–721.Google Scholar
Celeste, L., Baysu, G., Phalet, K., & Brown, R. (2020). Self-Affirmation and Test Performance in Ethnically Diverse Schools: A New Dual-Identity Affirmation Intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Celeste, L., Baysu, G., Phalet, K., Meeussen, L., & Kende, J. (2019). Can school diversity policies reduce belonging and achievement gaps between minority and majority youth? Multiculturalism, colorblindness, and assimilationism assessed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1603–1618.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.Google Scholar
Civitillo, S., Juang, L. P., Badra, M., & Schachner, M. K. (2019). The interplay between culturally responsive teaching, cultural diversity beliefs, and self-reflection: A multiple case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 341–351.Google Scholar
Civitillo, S., Schachner, M. K., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Juang, L., Handrick, A., & Noack, P. (2017). Towards a better understanding of cultural diversity approaches at school – A multi-informant and mixed-methods study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Grundschulunterricht aus Schüler-, Lehrer- und Beobachterperspektive: Zusammenhänge und Vorhersage von Lernerfolg [Primary school instruction as seen by students, teachers, and observers: Associations and prediction of successful learning]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 127–137.Google Scholar
Fetvadjiev, V. H., Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., & Hill, C. (2015). The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A culture-informed instrument for the country’s main ethnocultural groups. Psychological Assessment, 27, 827–837.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, E., Kupper, K., Wagner, R., & Bongard, S. (2013). Immigrant youth in Germany. European Psychologist, 18, 158–168.Google Scholar
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478–493.Google Scholar
Gay, G. (1975). Organizing and designing culturally pluralistic curriculum. Educational Leadership, 33, 176–183.Google Scholar
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116.Google Scholar
Gay, G. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: international mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7, 123–139.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2017). The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 18–39.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, H., & Brinkworth, M. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15, 380–387.Google Scholar
Gniewosz, B., & Noack, P. (2006). Intergenerationale Transmissions-und Projektionsprozesse intoleranter Einstellungen zu Ausländern in der Familie [Intergenerational transmission and projection processes of intolerant attitudes toward foreigners in the family]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38, 33–42.Google Scholar
Gniewosz, B., & Noack, P. (2008). Classroom climate indicators and attitudes towards foreigners. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 609–624.Google Scholar
Godfrey, E. B., & Grayman, J. K. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1801–1817.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2006). Peer victimization in schools. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 317–321.Google Scholar
Green, C. W., Adams, A. M., & Turner, C. W. (1988). Development and validation of the school interracial climate scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.Google Scholar
Haenni Hoti, A., Heinzmann, S., Müller, M., & Buholzer, A. (2017). Psychosocial adaptation and school success of Italian, Portuguese and Albanian students in Switzerland: Disentangling migration background, acculturation and the school context. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18, 85–106.Google Scholar
Ham, S.-H., Yang, K.-E., & Cha, Y.-K. (2017). Immigrant integration policy for future generations? A cross-national multilevel analysis of immigrant-background adolescents’ sense of belonging at school. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 40–50.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2.Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.Google Scholar
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huddleston, T., Niessen, J., Chaoimh, E. N., & White, E. (2011). Migrant Integration Policy Index III. Retrieved from http://issuu.com/mipex/docs/migrant_integration_policy_index_mipexiii_2011?e=2578332/3681189#search.Google Scholar
Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., & van der Zee, K. I. (2015). Being part of diversity. The effects of an all-inclusive multicultural diversity approach on majority members’ perceived inclusion and support for organizational diversity efforts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, C. (1985). Translating culture: From ethnographic information to educational program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 16, 105–123.Google Scholar
Jugert, P., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2011). Friendship preferences among German and Turkish preadolescents. Child Development, 82, 812–829.Google Scholar
Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 1272–1311.Google Scholar
Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and Social Exclusion – Morality, Prejudice, and Group Identity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kinket, B., & Verkuyten, M. (1999). Intergroup evaluations and social context: A multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 219–237.Google Scholar
Kiuru, N., Nurmi, J.-E., Aunola, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2009). The role of peer groups in adolescents’ educational trajectories. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 521–547.Google Scholar
Kristen, C., & Granato, N. (2007). The educational attainment of the second generation in Germany: Social origins and ethnic inequality. Ethnicities, 7, 343–366.Google Scholar
Lam, A. C., Ruzek, E. A., Schenke, K., Conley, A. M., & Karabenick, S. A. (2015). Student perceptions of classroom achievement goal structure: Is it appropriate to aggregate? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1102–1115.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47, 106–124.Google Scholar
Molina, L. E., & Wittig, M. A. (2006). Relative importance of contact conditions in explaining prejudice reduction in a classroom context: Separate and equal? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 489–509.Google Scholar
Nesdale, D. (2004). Social identity processes and children’s ethnic prejudice. In Bennett, M. & Sani, F. (eds.), The Development of the Social Self (pp. 219–246). East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nesdale, D., Maass, A., Durkin, K., & Griffiths, J. (2005). Group norms, threat, and children’s racial prejudice. Child Development, 76, 652–663.Google Scholar
Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2005). Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 108–130.Google Scholar
Peterson, E. R., Rubie-Davies, C., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. (2016). Teachers’ explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap. Learning and Instruction, 42, 123–140.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280.Google Scholar
Phinney, J. S., Jacoby, B., & Silva, C. (2007). Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 478–490.Google Scholar
Pulinx, R., van Avermaet, P., & Agirdag, O. (2017). Silencing linguistic diversity: the extent, the determinants and consequences of the monolingual beliefs of Flemish teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20, 542–556.Google Scholar
Quintana, S. M., Castañeda-English, P., & Ybarra, V. C. (1999). Role of perspective-taking abilities and ethnic socialization in development of adolescent ethnic identity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 161–184.Google Scholar
Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82, 1715–1737.Google Scholar
Rattan, A., & Ambady, N. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 12–21.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121–154.Google Scholar
Schachner, M., Schwarzenthal, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Noack, P. (2018). How all students can belong and achieve – Effects of the cultural diversity climate amongst students of immigrant and non-immigrant background in Germany. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 703–716.Google Scholar
Schachner, M. K. (2017). From equality and inclusion to cultural pluralism – evolution and effects of cultural diversity perspectives in schools. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 1–17.Google Scholar
Schachner, M. K., He, J., Heizmann, B., & van de Vijver, A. J. R. (2017). Acculturation and school adjustment of immigrant youth in six European countries: Findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
Schachner, M. K., Juang, L., Moffitt, U., & van de Vijver, A. J. R. (2018). Schools as acculturative and developmental contexts for youth of immigrant and refugee background. European Psychologist, 23, 44–56.Google Scholar
Schachner, M. K., Noack, P., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Eckstein, K. (2016). Cultural diversity climate and psychological adjustment at school – Equality and inclusion versus cultural pluralism. Child Development, 87, 1175–1191.Google Scholar
Schachner, M. K., Schwarzenthal, M., Moffitt, U., Civitillo, S., & Juang, L. P. (in press). Capturing a nuanced picture of classroom cultural diversity climate: Multigroup and multilevel analyses among secondary school students in Germany. Contemporary Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
Schenke, K., Ruzek, E., Lam, A. C., Karabenick, S. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Heterogeneity of student perceptions of the classroom climate: A latent profile approach. Learning Environments Research, 20, 289–306.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W. (2001). The colorblind perspective in school: Causes and consequences. In Banks, J. A. & McGeeBanks, C. A. (eds.), Multicultural Education. Issues & Perspectives (4th ed., pp. 247–267). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schwarzenthal, M., Juang, L. P., Schachner, M. K., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Handrick, A. (2017). From tolerance to understanding: Exploring the development of intercultural competence in multiethnic contexts from early to late adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 388–399.Google Scholar
Schwarzenthal, M., Schachner, M. K., Juang, L., & van de Vijver, A. J. R. (2018). Reaping the Benefits of Cultural Diversity in Schools: Classroom Cultural Diversity Climate and Students’ Intercultural Competence. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Schwarzenthal, M., Schachner, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Juang, L. (2017). Equal but different? Effects of equality/inclusion and cultural pluralism on intergroup outcomes in multiethnic classrooms. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24, 260–271.Google Scholar
Siwatu, K. O., Putman, S. M., Starker-Glass, T. V., & Lewis, C. W. (2015). The Culturally Responsive Classroom Management Self-Efficacy Scale: Development and initial validation. Urban Education, 52, 1–27.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tropp, L. R., O’Brien, T. C., Gonzalez Gutierrez, R., Valdenegro, D., Migacheva, K., de Tezanos-Pinto, P., … Cayul, O. (2016). How school norms, peer norms, and discrimination predict interethnic experiences among ethnic minority and majority youth. Child Development, 87, 1436–1451.Google Scholar
Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957.Google Scholar
Tropp, L. R., & Prenevost, M. (2008). The role of intergroup contact in predicting children’s interethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta-analytic and field studies. In Levy, S. R. & Killen, M. (eds.), Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood through Adulthood (pp. 236–248). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2013). Multicultural education and inter-ethnic attitudes: An intergroup perspective. European Psychologist, 18, 179–190.Google Scholar

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (US). (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and Personality. Vol. 1. Psychological Aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Averill, J. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In Plutchik, R. & Kellerman, H. (eds.), Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience (Vol. 1, pp. 305–340). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28–58.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2011). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.Google Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Emotion without a word: Shame and guilt among Rarámuri Indians and Rural Javanese. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1111–1122.Google Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., Poortinga, Y. H., Ambadar, Z., Setiadi, B., Vaca, J. B., & Widiyanto, P. (2005). Body sensations associated with emotions in Rarámuri Indians, rural Javanese, and three student samples. Emotion, 5, 166–174.Google Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., Zeelenberg, M., Gilovich, T., Huang, W. H., & Shani, Y. (2014). Generality and cultural variation in the experience of regret. Emotion, 14, 1037–1048.Google Scholar
Brouwers, S. A., van Hemert, D. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology – 1970–2004. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251–262.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1997). Field experiments examining the culture of honor: The role of institutions perpetuating norms about violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1188–1199.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (3rd ed., Ekman, P., ed.). London: HarperCollins. (Original work published 1872.)Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expression: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). The Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T. (2007) From appeasement to conformity: Evolutionary and cultural perspectives on shame, competition, and cooperation. In Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Tangney, J. P. (eds.), The Self-Conscious Emotions: Theory and Research (pp. 174–193). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., & Fontaine, J. R. J. (2011). Methods for investigating structural equivalence. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 197–215). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J. (2005). Equivalence. In Kempf-Leonard, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (vol. 1, pp. 803–813). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J. (2008). Traditional and multilevel approaches in cross-cultural research: An integration of methodological frameworks. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (pp. 65–92). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J. (2011). A fourfold conceptual framework for cultural and cross-cultural psychology: relativism, construct universalism, repertoire universalism, and absolutism. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A., & Breugelmans, S. M. (eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 165–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., & Fischer, R. (2011). Data analytic approaches for investigating isomorphism between the individual-level and the cultural-level internal structure. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 273–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Luyten, P., de Boeck, P., Corveleyn, J., Fernandez, M., Herrera, D., & Ittzés, A. (2006). Untying the Gordian knot of guilt and shame: The structure of guilt and shame reactions based on situation and person variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 273–292.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B. & Suprapti, S. M. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and the Netherlands. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 61–86.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The global meaning structure of the emotion domain: Investigating the complementarity of multiple perspectives on meaning. In Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (eds.), Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook (pp. 106–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. (2007). The world of emotion is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050–1057.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (eds.). (2013). Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H., Markam, S., Sato, K., & Wiers, R. (1995). Emotions and emotion words. In Russell, J.A., Fernández-Dols, J.-M., Manstead, A. S. R., & Wellenkamp, J. C. (eds.), Everyday Conceptions of Emotion: An Introduction to the Psychology, Anthropology and Linguistics of Emotion (1st ed., pp. 121–144). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., Henry, T. R., List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Mucha, P. J., Greenhill, S., Gray, R. D., & Lindquist, K. A. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366, 1517–1522.Google Scholar
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., King, A., Yoon, C., Tompson, S., Huff, S., & Liberzon, I. (2014). The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) moderates cultural difference in independent versus interdependent social orientation. Psychological Science, 25, 1169–1177.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 93–124.Google Scholar
Klineberg, O. (1940). Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kret, M. E., Stekelenburg, J. J., Roelofs, K., & de Gelder, B. (2013). Perception of face and body expressions using electromyography, pupillometry and gaze measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 28.Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Diener, E., & Kim-Prieto, C. (2006). Universal intracultural and intercultural dimensions of the recalled frequency of emotional experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 491–515.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J, Bradley, M. M., & Cuthberth, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Lange, C. (1922). The Emotions (I. A. Haupt, trans.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Lange, J., Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Kleef, G. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Toward an integrative psychometric model of emotions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 444–468.Google Scholar
Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P. E., Heider, K., & Friesen, W. V. (1992). Emotion and autonomic nervous system activity in the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 972–988.Google Scholar
Loijens, L., & Krips, O. (2018). Face Reader Methodology Note. Noldus Information Technology White Paper.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Beyond the universality-specificity dichotomy. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 1–9.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–250.Google Scholar
Menon, U., & Shweder, R. A. (1994). Kali’s tongue: Cultural psychology and the power of shame in Orissa, India. In Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. (eds.), Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence (pp. 241–282). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 179–204.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., Frijda, N. H., & Scherer, K. R. (1997). Culture and emotion. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Saraswathi, T. S. (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Volume 2: Basic Processes and Human Development (pp. 255–297). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. (2015). Is “culture” a workable concept for (cross-)cultural psychology? Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards convergence? In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Theory and Method (Vol. 1) (2nd ed., pp. 347–387). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 22–34). Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.Google Scholar
Riegel, M., Moslehi, A., Michałowski, J. M., Żurawski, Ł., Horvat, M., Wypych, M., Jednoróg, K., & Marchewka, A. (2017). Nencki affective picture system: Cross-cultural study in Europe and Iran. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 274.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). Knowledge and Passion: Ilongot Notions of Self and Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 161–200.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.Google Scholar
Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Divorce and health: Current trends and future directions. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77, 227–236.Google Scholar
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1999). On the sequential nature of appraisal processes: Indirect evidence from a recognition task. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 763–793.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44, 695–729.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1307–1351.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Soriano, C. (2013). CoreGRID and MiniGRID: Development and validation of two short versions of the GRID instrument. In Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (eds.), Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook (pp. 523–541). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R., & Wallbott, H. G. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 310–328.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 136–182.Google Scholar
Soudijn, K. A., Hutschemaekers, G. J. M., & Van De Vijver, F. R. J. (1990). Culture conceptualisations. In van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Hutschemaekers, Giel J. M. (eds.), The Conceptualisation of Culture (pp. 19–39). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P. (1990). Assessing individual differences in proneness to shame and guilt: Development of the self-conscious affect and attribution inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 102–111.Google Scholar
Thayer, R. E. (1989). The Biopsychology of Mood and Arousal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: Vol. 1. The Positive Affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: Vol. 2. The Negative Affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Van Osch, Y. M. J., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2016). On the context dependence of emotion displays: Perceptions of gold medalists’ expressions of pride. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1332–1343.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9, 419–429.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis of Comparative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 273–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2008). Conceptual issues in multilevel models. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (pp. 65–92). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Internal structure equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141–156.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 263–280.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.Google Scholar
Wong, Y., & Tsai, J. (2007). Cultural models of shame and guilt. In Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Tangney, J. P. (eds.), The Self-Conscious Emotions: Theory and Research (pp. 209–223). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619.Google Scholar

References

Allen, M. W., Ng, S. H., Ikeda, K., Jawan, J. A., Sufi, A. H., Wilson, M., & Yang, K. S. (2007). Two decades of change in cultural values and economic development in eight East Asian and Pacific Island nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 247–269.Google Scholar
Alsleben, P. (2010). Das Bedürfnis nach Freiheit: Selbst-Integration als viertes Basismotiv [The need for freedom: Self-integration as a fourth basic motive]. Munich: VDM.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614.Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (1958). The need for achievement as measured by graphic expression. In Atkinson, J. W. (ed.), Motives in Fantasy, Action and Society (pp. 249–265). Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The Dynamics of Action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W., & McClelland, D. C. (1948). The projective expression of needs. II. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on Thematic Apperception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 643–658.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., & Chasiotis, A. (2013). Helping and volunteering across cultures: Determinants of prosocial behavior. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5, 1–27.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., Cemalcilar, Z., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping? The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 645–658.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Cemalcilar, Z., Chong, A., & Yue, X. (2016). A cross-cultural study of explicit and implicit motivation for long-term volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 375–396.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2015). Implicit and explicit prosocial motivation as antecedents of volunteering: The moderating role of parenthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 127–133.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.Google Scholar
Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.Google Scholar
Baumann, N., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Implicit motives: A look from Personality Systems Interaction Theory. In Schultheiss, O. C. & Brunstein, J. C. (eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 375–403). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumann, N., & Scheffer, D. (2011). Seeking flow in the achievement domain: The achievement flow motive behind flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 267–284.Google Scholar
Bender, M. (2015). Narrative content coding. In van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Ortner, T. (eds.), Behavior Based Assessment: Going Beyond Self-Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation and Social Domains. EAPA Series. (pp. 45–63). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Botha, E. (1971). The achievement motive in three cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 85, 163–170.Google Scholar
Bradburn, N. M. (1963). n Achievement and father dominance in Turkey. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 464–468.Google Scholar
Brouwers, S. A., van Hemert, D. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251–262.Google Scholar
Brunstein, J. C. (2010). Implicit motives and explicit goals: The role of motivational congruence in emotional well-being. In Schultheiss, O. C. & Brunstein, J. C. (eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 347–374). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C., & Grässmann, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508.Google Scholar
Busch, H., & Hofer, J. (2012). A picture story exercise set in a German and a Cameroonian sample: Ipsative stability, retest reliability, and sample-level stability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 125–131.Google Scholar
Busch, H., Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., & Campos, D. (2013). The achievement flow motive as an element of the autotelic personality: Predicting educational attainment in three cultures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 239–254.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A. (2011). An epigenetic view on culture: What evolutionary developmental psychology has to offer for cross-cultural psychology. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A., & Breugelmans, S. M. (eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 376–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A. (2015). Measuring implicit motives. In Ortner, T. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Behavior-Based Assessment in Psychology. Going Beyond Self-Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains. European Association of Psychological Assessment (EAPA) Series, vol. 1, pp. 81–96. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A. (2018). The developmental role of experience-based metacognition for cultural diversity in executive function, motivation, and mindreading. In Proust, J. & Fortier, M. (eds.), Metacognitive Diversity. An Interdisciplinary Approach, pp. 134–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Hofer, J. (2014). Childhood context explains cultural variance in implicit parenting motivation: Results from two studies with six samples from Cameroon, Costa Rica, Germany, and PR China. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 295–317.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., Kiessling, F., & Hofer, J. (2010). The emergence of the independent self: Autobiographical memory as a mediator of false belief understanding and motive orientation in Cameroonian and German preschoolers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 368–390.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2003). Die Messung impliziter Motive in Deutschland, Costa Rica und Kamerun [The measurement of implicit motives in Germany, Costa Rica, and Cameroon]. Research report to the German Research Foundation (DFG).Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2018). Implicit prosocial power motivation: Views from evolutionary and developmental cross-cultural psychology. In Baumann, N., Kazen, M., Quirin, M., & Koole, S. (eds.), Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contribution to Motivation and Volition, pp. 73–86. Munich: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Chasiotis, A., Hofer, J., & Campos, D. (2006). When does liking children lead to parenthood? Younger siblings, implicit prosocial power motivation, and explicit love for children predict parenthood across cultures. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 95–123.Google Scholar
Child, I. L., Storm, T., & Veroff, J. (1958). Achievement themes in folk tales related to socialization practice. In Atkinson, J. W. (ed.), Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society (pp. 479–492). Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Cronk, L. (1995). Is there a role for culture in human behavioral ecology? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 181–205.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.Google Scholar
Engeser, S., Rheinberg, F., & Möller, M. (2009). Achievement motive imagery in German schoolbooks: A pilot study testing McClelland’s hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 110–113.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377–391.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, 1–19.Google Scholar
He, J., van de Vijver, F., Dominguez Espinoza, A. et al. (2015). Social desirable responding: Enhancement and denial in 20 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 49, 227–249.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2013). Living in accordance with one’s implicit motives: Cross-cultural evidence for beneficial effects of motive-goal congruence and motive satisfaction. In Efklides, A. & Moraitou, D. (eds.), A Positive Psychology Perspective on Quality of Life (pp. 51–66). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2015). Motivational development: Cross-cultural perspectives. In Wright, J. D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., vol. 15, pp. 951–956). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bender, M., Li, M., & Hagemeyer, B. (2010). Arousal of achievement motivation among student samples in three different cultural contexts: Self and social standards of evaluation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 758–775.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Campos, D., Li, M., & Law, R. (2010). The implicit power motive and sociosexuality in men and women: Pancultural effects of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 380–394.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Kärtner, J., Kiessling, F., & Law, R. (2010). Is self-determined functioning a universal prerequisite for motive-goal congruence? Examining the domain of achievement in three cultures. Journal of Personality, 78, 747–780.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Li, M., & Law, R. (2010). Effects of motive-goal congruence on well-being in the power domain: Considering goals and values in a German and two Chinese samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 610–620.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., & Schneider, C. (2015). The effect of motive-trait interaction on satisfaction of the implicit need for affiliation among German and Cameroonian adults. Journal of Personality, 83, 167–178.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2003). Congruence of life goals and implicit motives as predictors of life satisfaction: Cross-cultural implications of a study of Zambian male adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 251–272.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2004). Methodological considerations of applying a TAT-type picture-story-test in cross-cultural research: A comparison of German and Zambian adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 224–241.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2011). Implicit motives across cultures. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., & Campos, D. (2006). Congruence between social values and implicit motives: Effects on life satisfaction across three cultures. European Journal of Personality, 20, 305–324.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., Friedlmeier, W., Busch, H., & Campos, D. (2005). The measurement of implicit motives in three cultures: Power and Affiliation in Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 689–716.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Schröder, L., & Keller, H. (2012). Motivational basis of body contact: A multicultural study of mothers and their three-month-old infants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 858–876.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kagan, S., & Knight, G. P. (1981). Social motives among Anglo American and Mexican American children: Experimental and projective measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 93–106.Google Scholar
Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 317–327.Google Scholar
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 315–327.Google Scholar
Keller, H. (2007). Cultures of Infancy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002). The unconscious. In Ramachandran, V. S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Human Brain, vol. 4 (pp. 635–646). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
King, L. A. (1995). Wishes, motives, goals, and personal memories: Relations of measures of human motivation. Journal of Personality, 63, 985–1007.Google Scholar
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (2000). The volitional basis of Personality Systems Interaction Theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit. Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Interactions of mental systems]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (2001). The Operant Motive Test: Scoring Manual. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Lamba, S., & Mace, R. (2011). Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108, 14426–14430.Google Scholar
Lang, J. W. B. (2014). A dynamic Thurstonian item response theory of motive expression in the picture story exercise: Solving the internal consistency paradox of the PSE. Psychological Review, 121, 481–500.Google Scholar
Lindzey, G. (1961). Projective Techniques and Cross-Cultural Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. B. (1991). A perspective on Darwinian psychology: The importance of domain-general mechanisms, plasticity, and individual differences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 449–480.Google Scholar
Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In Warren, N. (ed.), Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 221–267). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Malda, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Temane, Q. M. (2010). Rugby versus soccer in South Africa: Content familiarity contributes to cross-cultural differences in cognitive test scores. Intelligence, 38, 582–595.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1971). Motivational Trends in Society. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human Motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., & Pilon, D. A. (1983). Sources of adult motives in patterns of parent behavior in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 564–574.Google Scholar
Miller, W. B., Pasta, D. J., MacMurray, J., Muhleman, D., & Comings, D. E. (2000). Genetic influences on childbearing motivation: Further testing a theoretical framework. In Rodgers, J. L., Rowe, D. C., & Miller, W. B. (eds.), Genetic Influences on Human Fertility and Sexuality. Theoretical and Empirical Contributions from the Biological and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 35–66). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The thematic apperception test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ng, I., Winter, D. G., & Cardona, P. (2011). Resource control and status as stimuli for arousing power motivation: An American-Chinese comparison. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 328–337.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pang, J. S. (2010). Content coding methods in implicit motive assessment: Standards of measurement and best practices for the Picture Story Exercise. In Schultheiss, O. C. & Brunstein, J. C. (eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 119–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pang, J. S., & Ring, H. (2020). Automated coding of implicit motives: A machine-learning approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 549–566.Google Scholar
Pang, J. S., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in U.S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294.Google Scholar
Parker, S. (1962). Motives in Eskimo and Ojibwa mythology. Ethnology, 1, 516–523.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. E., & Pang, J. S. (2013). Set ambiguity: A key determinant of reliability and validity in the picture story exercise. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 1–14.Google Scholar
Roch, R. M., Rösch, A. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2017). Enhancing congruence between implicit motives and explicit goal commitments: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
Rosen, B. C. (1959). Race, ethnicity, and the achievement syndrome. American Sociological Review, 24, 47–60.Google Scholar
Rosen, B. C. (1962). Socialization and achievement motivation in Brazil. American Sociological Review, 27, 612–624.Google Scholar
Runge, J. M., Lang, J. W. B., Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2019). Improving the assessment of implicit motives using IRT: Cultural differences and differential item functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 414–424.Google Scholar
Scheffer, D., Eichstädt, J., Chasiotis, A., & Kuhl, J. (2007). Toward an integrated measure of need affiliation and agreeableness derived from the Operant Motive Test. Psychology Science, 49, 308–324.Google Scholar
Scheffer, D., Kuhl, J., & Eichstädt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Inhaltsklassen, Auswertung, psychometrische Kennwerte und Validierung [The operant motive test (OMT): Contents, scoring, psychometric properties, and validation]. In StiensmeierPelster, J. & Rheinberg, F. (eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Diagnotics of motivation and self-concept] (pp. 151–167). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 2–14.Google Scholar
Schüler, J., Baumann, N., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Baum, I. (2019). Implicit motives and basic psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 87, 37–55.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C. (2013). Are implicit motives revealed in mere words? Testing the marker-word hypothesis with computer-based text analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 748.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (eds.). (2010). Implicit Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C., Jones, N. M., Davis, A. Q., & Kley, C. (2008). The role of implicit motivation in hot and cold goal pursuit: Effects on goal progress, goal rumination, and emotional well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 971–987.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C., Liening, S. H., & Schad, D. (2008). The reliability of a Picture Story Exercise measure of implicit motives: Estimates of internal consistency, retest reliability, and ipsative stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1560–1571.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O., & Pang, J. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., & Krueger, R. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.Google Scholar
Singh, S. (1978). Achievement motivation and entrepreneurial success: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 500–503.Google Scholar
Slabbinck, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Kenhove, P. (2013). Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of the pictorial attitude implicit association test and the picture story exercise as measures of the implicit power motive. European Journal of Personality, 27, 30–38.Google Scholar
Smith, C. P. (1992). Motivation and Personality: Handbook of Thematic Content Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. P. (2000). Content analysis and narrative analysis. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spengler, B., Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2020). A video game-based investigation of power stress moderators in children. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 345–355.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.Google Scholar
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–756.Google Scholar
Thrash, T. M., Elliott, A. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2007). Methodological and dispositional predictors of congruence between implicit and explicit need for achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 961–974.Google Scholar
Tuerlinckx, F., De Boeck, P., & Lens, W. (2002). Measuring needs with Thematic Apperception Test: A psychometric study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 448–461.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2000). The nature of bias. In Dana, R. H. (ed.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural and Multi-cultural Personality Assessment (pp. 87–106). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2006). Culture and psychology: A SWOT analysis of cross-cultural psychology. In Ling, Q., Zhang, H., & Zhang, K. (eds.), Progress in Psychological Science around the World: Proceedings of the 28th International Congress of Psychology, vol. 2 (pp. 279–298). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R, Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2010). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural developmental studies. In Bornstein, M. (ed.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Developmental Science (pp. 21–37). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar
Van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 346–360.Google Scholar
Weinberger, J., & McClelland, D. C. (1990). Cognitive versus traditional motivational models. Irreconcilable or complementary? In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition. Vol. 2: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 562–597). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1973). The Power Motive. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1991). Power, affiliation, and war: Three tests of a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 532–545.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for Scoring Motive Imagery in Running Text. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1996). Personality: Analysis and Interpretation of Lives. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (2006). Taming power. In Rhode, D. L. (ed.), Moral Leadership: The Theory and Practice of Power, Judgment, and Policy (pp. 159–175). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.Google Scholar
Woike, B. A. (2008). A functional framework for the influence of implicit and explicit motives on autobiographical memory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 99–117.Google Scholar
Woike, B. A., & Bender, M. (2009). Implicit motives as a way to understand cognitive processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 702–710.Google Scholar
Yu, A.-B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self, and Chinese achievement motivation. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 227–246). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.Google Scholar
Bangeni, B., & Kapp, R. (2007). Shifting language attitudes in a linguistically diverse learning environment. Journal of Multilingual Development, 28, 253–270.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar
Bell, C., & Njoli, N. (2016). The role of big five factors on predicting job crafting propensities amongst administrative employees in a South African tertiary institution. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & Waller, N. G. (2002). From adorable to worthless: Implicit and self-report structure of highly evaluative personality descriptors. European Journal of Personality, 16, 1–41.Google Scholar
Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2008). What is job crafting and why does it matter? The University of Michigan, Ross School of Business, From the Center for Positive Organizational Scholarship. Retrieved from the website of Positive Organizational Scholarship on 23 March 2020.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2011). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, S. X., & Au, A. K. Y. (2017). Personality and adjustment in bilingual and biculture context. In Church, A. T. (ed.). The Praeger Handbook of Personality across Cultures (pp. 247–275). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., & Ho, Y. W. (2018). Culturally relevant personality assessment. In Shigemasu, K., Kuwano, S., Sato, T., & Matsuzawa, T. (eds.), Diversity in Harmony – Insights from Psychology (pp. 211–229). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., & Fan, W. (2013). From Chinese to cross-cultural personality inventory: A combined emic–etic approach to the study of personality in culture. In Gelfand, M., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (eds.), Advances in Culture and Psychology (vol. 3, pp. 117–179). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Gan, Y., Song, W., & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.Google Scholar
Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651–703.Google Scholar
Church, A. T. (2017). Personality across cultures: Historical overview and current topics. In Church, A. T. (ed.), The Praeger Handbook of Personality across Cultures (pp. 1–45). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.Google Scholar
Claassen, N. C. W. (1997). Culture differences, politics and test bias in South Africa. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 297–307.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Daouk-Öyry, L., Zeinoun, P., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2016). Integrating global and local perspectives in psycholexical studies: A GloCal approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 19–28.Google Scholar
Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2015). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 163–183.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Mlacic, B. (2017). Psycholexical studies of personality structures across cultures. In Church, A. T. (ed.), The Praeger Handbook of Personality across Cultures. (pp. 161–192). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
De Souza Peres, A. J. (2018). The Personality Lexicon in Brazilian Portuguese: Studies with Natural Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Brasilia, Brazil.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Job crafting. In Peeters, M. C. W., de Jonge, J., & Taris, T. W. (eds.), An Introduction to Contemporary Work Psychology (pp. 414–433). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Echterhoff, W., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. M. (2018). Understanding and improving work related behaviour under transcultural conditions of W.E.I.R.D. and Ubuntu regions. Application for multinational workshops for Sub-Saharan Africa, VolkswagenStiftung.Google Scholar
Employment Equity Act (2013). Employment Equity Act, No. 47 of 2013. Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from www.labour.gov.za/docs/legislation/eea/act98-055.html.Google Scholar
Fetvadjiev, V. H., Meiring, D., Nel, J. A., Hill, C., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). Indigenous personality structure and measurement in South Africa. In Church, A. T. (ed.), The Praeger Handbook of Personality across Cultures (pp. 137–160). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fetvadjiev, V. H., Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., & Hill, C. (2015). The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A culture-informed instrument for the country’s main ethnocultural groups. Psychological Assessment. 27, 827–837.Google Scholar
Fetvadjiev, V. H., Neha, T., van de Vijver, F. J. R., McManus, M., & Meiring, D. (2018, June). Social-relational personality concepts across cultures: The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI) and family orientation in New Zealand. In V. H. Fetvadjiev (Chair), Methods in personality and culture: Insights from Africa and beyond. Invited symposium at the Tilburg Conference on Methods and Culture in Psychology, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Fouche, J. (2018). Linking the Big Five Personality Constructs to Psychological Ownership. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, C. D., Paterson, H. Le Roux, N., & Herbst, D. (2004). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: A Needs Analysis. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, C. D., & Roodt, G. (2001). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment in South Africa. Johannesburg: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, C., & Roodt, G. (2013). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment in the South African Context (4th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., & Reise, S. P. (1995). Personality dimensions and measures potentially relevant to health: A focus on hostility. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 245–253.Google Scholar
Gaganakis, M. (1992). Language and ethnic group relations in non-racial schools. English Academy Review, 9, 46–55.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Wheeler, L. (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (vol. 2, pp.141–165). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Grib, C. (2017). Differential Item Analysis of the Afrikaans Version of the South African Personality Inventory. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., Von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.Google Scholar
Hendriks, A. A., Hofstee, W. K., & De Raad, B. (1999). The Five Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307–325.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33, 1–75.Google Scholar
Heugh, K. (2006). Theory and practice – Language education models in Africa: Research, design, decision-making, and outcomes. In Alidou, H., Boly, A., Brock-Utne, B., Diallo, Y. S., Heugh, K., & Wolff, H. E. (eds.), Optimizing Learning and Education in Africa: The Language Factor. A Stock-Taking Research on Mother Tongue and Bilingual Education in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 56–84). Paris: Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA).Google Scholar
Hill, C., Nel, J. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Meiring, D., Valchev, V. H., Adams, B. G., & De Bruin, G. P. (2013). Developing and testing items for the South African Personality Inventory (SAPI). SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39, 1–13.Google Scholar
Hlahleni, M. (2017). Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the South African Personality Inventory – Tshivenda Version. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
International Test Commission. (2010). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. www.InTestCom.org.Google Scholar
International Test Commission. (2016). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2nd ed.). www.InTestCom.org.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1054.Google Scholar
Legodi, L. (2017). Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the South African Personality Inventory – Sesotho Version. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Lemos-Giráldez, S., & Fidalgo‐Aliste, A. M. (1997). Personality dispositions and health‐related habits and attitudes: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Personality, 11, 197–209.Google Scholar
Macdonald, C. A. (1990). Crossing the Threshold into Standard Three in Black Education: The Consolidated Main Project of the Threshold Project. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Marjorie, L. (1982). Language policy and oppression in South Africa. Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine. Retrieved 23 March from www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/language-policy-and-oppression-south-africa.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Tratwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five Factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. (eds.). (2002). The Five-Factor Model of Personality across Cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Meiring, D. (2007). Bias and Equivalence of Psychological Measures in South Africa. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Labyrint.Google Scholar
Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Rothmann, S. (2006). Bias in an adapted version of the 15FQ+ in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 340–356.Google Scholar
Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Rothmann, S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). Construct, item, and method bias of cognitive and personality measures in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 1–8.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2014). The Cross-Cultural Application of Social-Relational Scales of the South African Personality Inventory (SAPI) in Industry. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Morton, N., Hill, C., & Meiring, D. (2018). Validating the South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): Examining green behaviour and job crafting within a nomological network of personality. International Journal of Personality Journal, 4, 25–38.Google Scholar
Mzangwa, S., & Septa, S. (2019). Transformation as part of evolving organisational culture in the South African higher education institutions. Cogent Social Sciences, 5, 1–13. 1638635.Google Scholar
Nel, J. A. (2008). Uncovering Personality Dimensions in Eleven Different Language Groups in South Africa: An Exploratory Study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, South Africa.Google Scholar
Nel, J. A., Valchev, V. H., Rothmann, S., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Meiring, D., & De Bruin, G. P. (2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80, 915–948.Google Scholar
Oh, I. S. (2009). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in East Asia: A cross-cultural validity generalization study. University of Iowa, Iowa City. Retrieved from ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing (3374065).Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organisational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027.Google Scholar
Oosthuizen, H. (2017). The South African Personality Inventory: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Setswana Version. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Owen, K. (1991). Test bias: The validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for various population groups in South Africa regarding the constructs measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112–118.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychology Attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology,7, 84–107.Google Scholar
Quaiser-Pohl, C. M., Saunders, M., Kariuki, P. W., & Arasa, J. N. (2020). Is there a Kenyan personality? – First evaluation of a Kenyan adaptation of the South African Personality Inventory (SAPI). Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11, 271–288.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2008). Measures of the personality factors found recurrently in human lexicons. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment (vol. 2, pp. 29–54). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., & Bel-Bahar, T. S. (2014). Human attribute concepts: Relative ubiquity across twelve mutually isolated languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 199–216.Google Scholar
Saunders, M., Quaiser-Pohl, C. M., Wickord, L. Ch., & Rahe, M. (2018). Contributions of personality, social axioms and gender roles to work-life balance. University of Koblenz-Landau, Institute of Psychology, Campus Koblenz, Germany.Google Scholar
Slabbert, S., van der Berg, I., & Finlsayson, R. (2007). Jam or cheese? The challenge of the national broadcaster in a multilingual context. Language Matters, 38, 332–356.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & O’Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 1–11.Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa (2016). Community Survey 2016, Statistical release P0301 Statistics South Africa. Retrieved 23 March from http://cs2016.statssa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/NT-30–06-2016-RELEASE-for-CS-2016-_Statistical-releas_1-July-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Stevens, L. (2014). A Validation Study of the South African Personality Inventory. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1–25.Google Scholar
Tóth-Király, I., Bõthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2017). An illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) framework on the passion scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
Ulich, E., & Wiese, B. S. (2011). Life Domain Balance: Konzepte zur Verbesserung der Lebensqualität [Life Domain Balance: Concepts fort he Improvement of Quality of Life]. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Valchev, V. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Meiring, D., Nel, J. A., Hill, C., Laher, S., & Adams, B. G. (2014). Beyond agreeableness: Social-relational personality concepts from an indigenous and cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 17–32.Google Scholar
Valchev, V. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., Rothmann, S., & Meiring, D. (2013). The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions across ethnocultural groups in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1077–1091.Google Scholar
Valchev, V. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., Rothmann, S., Meiring, D., & De Bruin, G. P. (2011). Implicit personality conceptions of the Nguni cultural-linguistic groups of South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 235–266.Google Scholar
Van Aarde, N., Meiring, D., & Wiernik, B. M. (2017). The validity of the Big Five personality traits for job performance: Meta-analyses of South African studies. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 25, 223–239.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Rothmann, S. (2004). Assessment in multi-cultural groups: The South African case. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 1–7.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.Google Scholar
Vogt, L., & Laher, S. (2009). The Five Factor Model of personality and individualism/collectivism in South Africa: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39–54.Google Scholar
Webb, V., Lafon, M., & Pare, P. (2010). Bantu languages in education in South Africa: An overview. Language Learning Journal, 38, 273–292.Google Scholar
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.Google Scholar
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201.Google Scholar
Zeinoun, P., Daouk-Öyry, L., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). A mixed-methods study of personality conceptions in the Levant: Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the West Bank. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 453–465.Google Scholar

References

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, i–171.Google Scholar
Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300–307.Google Scholar
Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89–118.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of Honesty-Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.Google Scholar
Barakat, H. (1993). The Arab World: Society, Culture, and State. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (2000). Toward the development of quasiindigenous personality constructs: Measuring Los Cinco Grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 141–157.Google Scholar
Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. A. M. (2001). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277–295.Google Scholar
Brokken, F. B. (1978). The language of personality (Doctoral dissertation, Groningen).Google Scholar
Buckwalter, T., & Parkinson, D. B. (2011). A Frequency Dictionary of Arabic: Core Vocabulary for Learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., & Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8, 357–369.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W.-Z., Zhang, J.-X., & Zhang, J.-P. (1996). Development of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J.-X., Sun, H.-F., Gan, Y.-Q., Song, W.-Z., & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 10, 3–24.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., Reyes, J. A. S., Katigbak, M. S., & Grimm, S. D. (1997). Filipino personality structure and the Big Five model: A lexical approach. Journal of Personality, 65, 477–528.Google Scholar
Daouk-Öyry, L., Zeinoun, P., Choueiri, L., van de Vijver, A.J.R., (2016). Integrating Global and Local Perspectives in Psycholexical Studies: A GloCal Approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 19–28.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. (1994). An expedition in search of a fifth universal factor: Key issues in the lexical approach. European Journal of Personality, 8, 229–250.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347–364.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlacic´, B., Blas, L. D., & Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., & Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19–41.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Hendriks, A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6, 301–319.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474.Google Scholar
Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12, 75–101.Google Scholar
Fetvadjiev, V. H., Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., & Hill, C. (2015). The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A culture-informed instrument for the country’s main ethnocultural groups. Psychological Assessment, 27, 827–837.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B. (1990). The use of everyday personality language for scientific purposes. European Journal of Personality, 4, 77–88.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Z.. (2011). Lexical Variation: Modern Standard Arabic. In L. Edzard & R. D. Jong (eds), Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 03 December 2020. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1570-6699_eall_EALL_COM_vol3_0189.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. S. (2001). Diglossia: The state of the art. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 117–130.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fenn, C. D. (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Retrieved from www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
Massoud, J. (ed.) (2005). The Official Dictionary (الرّائد المورد) (3rd ed.). Beirut: Malayin.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1990). Traits and trait names: How well is Openness represented in natural languages? European Journal of Personality, 4, 119–129.Google Scholar
Nel, J. A., Valchev, V. H., Rothmann, S., van de Vijver, F., Meiring, D., & de Bruin, G. P. (2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80, 915–948.Google Scholar
Piedmont, R. L., & Aycock, W. (2007). An historical analysis of the lexical emergence of the Big Five personality adjective descriptors. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1059–1068.Google Scholar
Quevedo-Aguado, M. P., Iraegui, A., Anivarro, E. M., & Ross, P. (1996). Linguistic descriptors of personality in the Spanish language: A first taxonomic study. European Journal of Personality, 10, 25–34.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (eds.), Global Modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296–1312.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 856–875.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., & Bel-Bahar, T. S. (2014). Human Attribute concepts: Relative ubiquity across twelve mutually isolated languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 199–216.Google Scholar
Somer, O., & Goldberg, L. R. (1999). The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 431–450.Google Scholar
Szarota, P., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 21, 823–852.Google Scholar
Szirmák, Z., & De Raad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95–117.Google Scholar
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2020). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 1–36.Google Scholar
Wasti, S. A., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 665–684.Google Scholar
Zeinoun, P., Daouk-Öyry, L., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017a). A mixed-methods study of personality conceptions in the Levant: Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the West Bank. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 453–465.Google Scholar
Zeinoun, P., Daouk-Öyry, L., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2017b). Arab-Levantine personality structure: A psycholexical study of Modern Standard Arabic in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and the West Bank. Journal of Personality, 85, 453–465.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Saucier, G., Gao, D., & Liu, J. (2009). The factor structure of Chinese personality terms. Journal of Personality, 77, 363–400.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×