Book contents
- Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
- Modern European Philosophy
- Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Phenomenology and Objective Thought
- Chapter 2 Sensations, Associations and Explanations
- Chapter 3 Attention, Judgement and Other Work
- Chapter 4 Back to the Experience of the Body
- Chapter 5 The Body Schema and Our Skills
- Chapter 6 Motor Intentionality and Our Landscapes
- Chapter 7 Others Expressive, Engaged and Exposed
- Chapter 8 Language, Speech and Affectivity
- Chapter 9 Temporality, Subjectivity and Idealisation
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2022
Book contents
- Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
- Modern European Philosophy
- Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Phenomenology and Objective Thought
- Chapter 2 Sensations, Associations and Explanations
- Chapter 3 Attention, Judgement and Other Work
- Chapter 4 Back to the Experience of the Body
- Chapter 5 The Body Schema and Our Skills
- Chapter 6 Motor Intentionality and Our Landscapes
- Chapter 7 Others Expressive, Engaged and Exposed
- Chapter 8 Language, Speech and Affectivity
- Chapter 9 Temporality, Subjectivity and Idealisation
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of PerceptionOn the Body Informed, pp. 233 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Aristotle. 1984a. Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1552–728.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1984b. On the Soul, trans. W. D. Ross and rev. J. A. Smith, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 641–92.Google Scholar
Ataria, Yochai, Tanaka, Shogo and Gallagher, Shaun (eds.). 2021. Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakewell, Sarah. 2016. At the Existentialist Café: Freedom, Being and Apricot Cocktails. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas. 2004. ‘Introduction’ in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.), Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings. London: Routledge, 1–32.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas 2007. ‘Speaking and Spoken Speech’ in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.), Reading Merleau-Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 87–103.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas 2019. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Cogito’ in Mildenberg, Ariane (ed.), Understanding Merleau-Ponty, Understanding Modernism. London: Bloomsbury, 19–32.Google Scholar
Bastian, Henry Charlton. 1882. The Brain as an Organ of Mind, 3rd ed. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Co.Google Scholar
Berendzen, Joseph C. 2010. ‘Coping without Foundations: On Dreyfus’s Use of Merleau-Ponty’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18(5), 629–49.Google Scholar
Bergonzoni, Carolina. 2017. ‘When I Dance My Walk: A Phenomenological Analysis of Habitual Movement in Dance Practices’. Phenomenology and Practice, 11(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1991. Matter and Memory, trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri 1992. ‘The Life and Work of Ravaisson’ in The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. Mabelle L. Anderson. New York: Citadel Press, 220–52.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri 2001. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, trans. F. L. Pogson. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bernet, Rudolf. 1990. ‘Husserl’s Concept of the World’ in Dallery, Arleen B., Scott, Charles E. and Roberts, P. Holley (eds.), Crises in Continental Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Boring, Edwin G. 1921. ‘The Stimulus Error’. The American Journal of Psychology, 32(4), 449–71.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor, and Hansen, Mark (eds.). 2005. The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S. 1984. ‘Habitual Body and Memory in Merleau-Ponty’. Man and World, 17(3–4), 279–97.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1957. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 3, The Phenomenology of Knowledge, trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, David. 2017. ‘Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenology of Natural Time’ in Jacobson, Kirsten and Russon, John (eds.), Perception and Its Development in Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 159–90.Google Scholar
Cole, Jonathan, and Paillard, Jacques. 1995. ‘Living without Touch and Peripheral Information about Body Position and Movement: Studies upon Deafferented Subjects’ in Bermúdez, José Luis, Marcel, Anthony and Eilan, Naomi (eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 245–66.Google Scholar
Conrad, Klaus. 1933. ‘Das Körperschema: Eine kritische Studie und der Versuch einer Revision’. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 147(1), 346–69.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. 2015. ‘The Poetry of ‘Flesh’ or the Reality of Perception? Merleau-Ponty’s Fundamental Error’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23(2), 255–78.Google Scholar
De Preester, Helena. 2008. ‘From Ego to Alter Ego: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty and a Layered Approach to Intersubjectivity’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 133–42.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1984a. Discourse on the Method in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, trans. and ed. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–51.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1984b. Meditations on First Philosophy in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, trans. and ed. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12–62.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1984c. The Passions of the Soul in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, trans. and ed. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 328–404.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1984d. ‘Letter to Elizabeth, 28th June 1643’ in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, trans. and ed. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 226–8.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1896. ‘The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology’. Psychological Review, 3, 357–70.Google Scholar
Dillon, Martin C. 1987. ‘Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty’. Kant-Studien, 78(3), 403–23.Google Scholar
Dillon, Martin C. 1998. Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, 2nd ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Eran. 2007. ‘Freedom, Perception and Radical Reflection’ in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.), Reading Merleau-Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 139–51.Google Scholar
Dreon, Roberta. 2016. ‘Merleau-Ponty from Perception to Language. New Elements of Interpretation’. Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience, 9, 48–66.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2002. ‘Intelligence without Representation: Merleau-Ponty’s Critique of Mental Representation’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367–83.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert 2013. ‘The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental’ in Schear, Joseph K. (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-In-The-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge, 15–40.Google Scholar
Drummond, John. 1983. ‘Objects’ Optimal Appearances and the Immediate Awareness of Space in Vision’. Man and World, 16(3), 177–205.Google Scholar
Ellis, Willis D. (trans. and ed.). 1938. A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co and Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo. 2006. ‘Lived Space, Geometrical Space in Kant’. Studi Kantiani, 19, 11–30.Google Scholar
Fink, Eugen. 1970. ‘The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism’ in Elveton, Roy O. (trans. and ed.), The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 73–147.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1984. ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’ in On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis, trans. James Strachey et al. and ed. Dickson, Albert. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–338.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1985. ‘Civilization and Its Discontents’ in Civilization, Society and Religion, trans. James Strachey et al. and ed. Dickson, Albert. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 251–340.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005a. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun 2005b. ‘Phenomenological Contributions to a Theory of Social Cognition’. Husserl Studies, 21(2), 95–110.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun 2017. Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. 2013. ‘Transcendental Philosophy and the Given’ in Schear, Joseph K. (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-In-The-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge, 110–42.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian 2015. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Transcendental Theory of Perception’ in Gardner, Sebastian and Grist, Matthew (eds.), The Transcendental Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 294–323.Google Scholar
Gaultier, Jules de. 1902. Le Bovarysme, essai sur le pouvoir d’imaginer. Paris: Société du Mercure de France.Google Scholar
Gelb, Adhémar, and Goldstein, Kurt. 1920. ‘Über den Einfluss des vollständigen Verlustes des optischen Vorstellungsvermögens auf das tactile Erkennen’ in Psychologische Analyse hirnpathologischer Fälle auf Grund von Untersuchungen Hirnverletzer, vol. 1, ed. Gelb, Adhémar and Goldstein, Kurt. Leipzig: Barth, 157–250.Google Scholar
Gelb, Adhémar, and Goldstein, Kurt 1924. ‘Über Farbennamenamnesie’. Psychologische Forschung, 6(1), 127–86.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1923. ‘Über die Abhängigkeit der Bewegungen von optischen Vorgängen. Bewegungsstörungen bei Seelenblinden’. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 54(1), 141–94, Festschrift Liepmann.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Anton Abraham. 1930. ‘Aphasie und Motorik’. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 130(1), 385–412.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1949. ‘Gelb-Goldstein’s Concept of “Concrete” and “Categorial” Attitude and the Phenomenology of Ideation’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 10(2), 172–96.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron 1979. Human Encounters in the Social World, trans. Kersten, Fred and ed. Métraux, Alexandre. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Halák, Jan. 2021. ‘Body Schema Dynamics in Merleau-Ponty’ in Ataria, Yochai, Tanaka, Shogo and Gallagher, Shaun (eds.), Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–51.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael, Howarth, Jane and Keat, Russell. 1991. Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hass, Lawrence. 2008. Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Head, Henry. 1893. ‘On Disturbances of Sensation with Especial Reference to the Pain of Visceral Disease’. Brain, 16(1–2), 1–133.Google Scholar
Head, Henry and Holmes, Gordon. 1912. ‘Sensory Disturbances from Cerebral Lesions’. Brain, 34(2–3), 102–254.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 2002. ‘From Decisions to Passions: Merleau-Ponty’s Interpretation of Husserl’s Reduction’ in Toadvine, Ted and Embree, Lester (eds.), Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–46.Google Scholar
Hull, John M. 1997. On Sight and Insight: A Journey into the World of Blindness, 2nd ed. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Hung, Wai-Shun. 2005. ‘Perception and Self-Awareness in Merleau-Ponty: The Problem of the Tacit Cogito in the Phenomenology of Perception’. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 5, 211–24.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations, trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1969. Formal and Transcendental Logic, abridged trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. David Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1973. Experience and Judgement, trans. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks and ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1981. Husserl: Shorter Works, trans. Quentin Lauer et al. and ed. McCormick, Peter and Elliston, Frederick. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book, trans. Fred Kersten. The Hague, Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917), trans. John Barnett Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1997. Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907, trans. Richard Rojcewicz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 2001a. Analyses Concerning Active and Passive Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, trans. Anthony J. Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 2001b. Logical Investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay and ed. Moran, Dermot, 2 vols. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, Sheena. 2012. ‘Between Health and Illness: Positive Pain and World Formation’ in Käll, Lisa Folkmarson (ed.), Dimensions of Pain. London: Routledge, 84–93.Google Scholar
Inkpin, Andrew. 2017. ‘Was Merleau-Ponty a “Transcendental” Phenomenologist?’ Continental Philosophy Review, 50(1), 27–47.Google Scholar
Jackson, Gabrielle Benette. 2018. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Concept of Motor Intentionality: Unifying Two Kinds of Bodily Agency’. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(2), 763–79.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Hanne. 2014. ‘Transcendental Subjectivity and the Human Being’ in Heinämaa, Sara, Hartimo, Mirja and Miettinen, Timo (eds.), Phenomenology and the Transcendental. London: Routledge, 87–105.Google Scholar
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rasmus. 2009. ‘Motor Intentionality and the Case of Schneider’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 371–88.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rasmus 2013. ‘Merleau-Ponty and the Transcendental Problem of Bodily Agency’ in Jensen, Rasmus and Moran, Dermot (eds.), The Phenomenology of Embodied Subjectivity. Heidelberg: Springer, 43–61.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1933. Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed., trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1938. Opus Postumum. Kants Gesammelte Schriften, Band 22. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1992. Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, trans. and ed. Walford, David with Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement, ed. Guyer, Paul and trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kee, Hayden. 2018. ‘Phenomenology and Ontology of Language and Expression: Merleau-Ponty on Speaking and Spoken Speech’. Human Studies, 41(3), 415–35.Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1938. ‘Physical Gestalten’ in Ellis, Willis D. (trans. and ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co and Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co, 17–54.Google Scholar
Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. 1937. ‘Utilisation possible du schématisme kantien pour une théorie de la perception’. Études philosophiques, 11, 30–4.Google Scholar
Landes, Donald A. 2013. Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael, and Staehler, Tanja. 2010. Phenomenology: An Introduction. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel. 1949. ‘Outlines of a Phenomenology of Having’ in Being and Having, trans. Katherine Farrar. Glasgow: MacLehose and Glasgow University Press, 154–75.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. 2014. ‘The Kantian Roots of Merleau-Ponty’s Account of Pathology’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(1), 124–49.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha 2016. ‘Kantian Themes in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Perception’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 98(2), 193–230.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1963a. The Structure of Behaviour, trans. Alden L. Fisher. Boston, MA: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1963b. In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. John O’Neill and ed. Edie, James M. and Wild, John. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1964a. Signs, trans. Richard C. McCleary and ed. Edie, James M. and Wild, John. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1964b. The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays, trans. Arleen B. Dallery et al. and ed. Edie, James M. and Wild, John. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1968. The Visible and the Invisible, Followed by Working Notes, trans. Alphonso Lingis and ed. Lefort, Claude. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1973. The Prose of the World, trans. John O’Neill and ed. Lefort, Claude. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 2005. Phénoménologie de la perception, 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 2012. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stewart. 1878. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, 5th ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader.Google Scholar
Milner, A. David, and Goodale, Melvyn A.. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. David. 2017. ‘How Do the Two Visual Streams Interact with Each Other.’ Experimental Brian Research, 235(5), 1297–308.Google Scholar
Montero, Barbara. 2013. ‘A Dancer Reflects’ in Schear, Joseph K. (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-In-The-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge, 303–19.Google Scholar
Mooney, Timothy. 2011. ‘Plasticity, Motor Intentionality and Concrete Movement in Merleau-Ponty’. Continental Philosophy Review, 44(4), 359–81.Google Scholar
Mooney, Timothy 2012. ‘Review of Donald A. Landes’ New Translation of Phenomenology of Perception’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 20(4), 589–94.Google Scholar
Mooney, Timothy 2017. ‘Repression and Operative Unconsciousness in Phenomenology of Perception’, in Legrand, Dorothée and Trigg, Dylan (eds.), Unconsciousness Between Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: Springer, 61–74.Google Scholar
Mooney, Timothy 2019. ‘Merleau-Ponty and Developing and Coping Reflectively’. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 17, 59–76.Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. 2010. ‘Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on Embodied Experience’, in Nenon, Thomas and Blosser, Philip (eds.), Advancing Phenomenology: Essays in Honor of Lester Embree. Dordrecht: Springer, 175–95.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin. 1995. ‘Perception’ in Smith, Barry and Woodruff Smith, David (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–238.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Overgaard, Søren. 2017. ‘Other Minds Embodied’. Continental Philosophy Review, 50(1), 65–80.Google Scholar
Paillard, Jacques. 1991. ‘Knowing Where and Knowing How to Get There’ in Paillard, Jacques (ed.), Brain and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 461–81.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 1986. ‘Analogue Content’. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 60(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1922. ‘Essai sur la multiplication logique et les débuts de la pensée formelle chez l’enfant’. Journal de Psychologie, normale et pathologique, 19, 222–61.Google Scholar
Pick, Arnold. 1922. ‘Störungen der Orientierung am eigenen Körper’. Psychologische Forschung, 1(1), 303–18.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur, and Blakeslee, Sandra. 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur, and Hirstein, William. 1998. ‘The Perception of Phantom Limbs’. Brain, 121(9), 1603–30.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Jack. 2019. ‘Embodiment and Emergence: Navigating an Epistemic and Metaphysical Dilemma’. Journal of Transcendental Philosophy, 1(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Joel Michael. 2017. ‘Merleau-Ponty, World-Creating Blindness, and the Phenomenology of Non-Normate Bodies’. Chiasmi International, 19, 419–34.Google Scholar
Robinet, André. 1963. Merleau-Ponty: Sa vie, son oeuvre avec un exposé de sa philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. 2007. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Account of Hallucination’. European Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), 76–90.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine 2011. Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1954. The Nature of Sympathy, trans. Peter Heath. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values, trans. Manfred Frings and Roger Funk. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schilder, Paul. 1923. Das Körperschema: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Bewusstsein des eigenen Körpers. Berlin and Heidelberg: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Schilder, Paul 1950. The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1969. The World as Will and Representation, vol. 1, trans. E. F. J. Payne. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2011. The Primacy of Movement, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sherrington, Charles. 1907. ‘On the Proprio-ceptive System, Especially in Its Reflex Aspect’. Brain, 29(4), 467–85.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard, 2005. ‘The Silent, Limping Body of Philosophy’ in Carman, Taylor and Hansen, Mark (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–80.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Mark. 2011. ‘Is Habit “The Fossilised Residue of a Spiritual Activity”? Ravaisson, Bergson, Merleau-Ponty’. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 33–52.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2007. ‘The Flesh of Perception’ in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.), Reading Merleau-Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 1–22.Google Scholar
Soffer, Gail. 1999. ‘The Other as Alter Ego: A Genetic Approach’. Husserl Studies, 15(3), 151–66.Google Scholar
Staehler, Tanja. 2008. ‘What Is the Question to Which Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation Is the Answer?’ Husserl Studies, 24(2), 99–117.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1989. The Problem of Empathy, 3rd ed., trans. Waltraut Stein. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, Julius E. 1927. ‘Ein Beitrag zur Analyse der Sexualfunktion’. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 107(1), 172–83.Google Scholar
Taipale, Joona. 2014. Phenomenology and Embodiment: Husserl and the Constitution of Subjectivity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shogo. 2015. ‘Intercorporeality as a Theory of Social Cognition’. Theory and Psychology, 25(4), 455–72.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shogo 2021. ‘Body Schema and Body Image in Motor Learning: Refining Merleau-Ponty’s Notion of Body Schema’ in Ataria, Yochai, Tanaka, Shogo and Gallagher, Shaun (eds.), Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–84.Google Scholar
Tiemersma, Douwe. 1982. ‘“Body-Image” and “Body-Schema” in the Existential Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty’. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 13(3), 246–55.Google Scholar
Toadvine, Ted. 2001. ‘Phenomenological Method in Merleau-Ponty’s Critique of Gurwitsch’. Husserl Studies, 17(3), 195–205.Google Scholar
Toadvine, Ted, and Embree, Lester (eds.). 2002. Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. 1926. Theoretical Biology, trans. D. L. Mackinnon. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von 2010. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans, with a Theory of Meaning, trans. Joseph D. O’Neill. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco, Thompson, Evan and Rosch, Eleanor. 2017. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernard. 1980. ‘Perception and Structure in Merleau-Ponty’, trans. J. Claude Evans. Research in Phenomenology, 10, 21–38.Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernard 2011. Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts, trans. Kozin, Alexander and Staehler, Tanja. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Max. 1938. ‘Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms’, abridged trans., in Ellis, Willis D. (trans. and ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. and Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 71–88.Google Scholar
Windholz, George. 1990. ‘The Second Signal System as Conceived by Pavlov and His Disciples’. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 25(4), 163–73.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1974. On Certainty, trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woelert, Peter. 2007. ‘Kant’s Hands, Spatial Orientation and the Copernican Turn’. Continental Philosophy Review, 40(2), 139–50.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. 2005. ‘Motives, Reasons and Causes’ in Carman, Taylor and Hansen, Mark (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–28.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2014. Self and Others: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaner, Richard. 1964. The Problem of Embodiment: Some Contributions to a Phenomenology of the Body. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Zaner, Richard 2003. ‘Sisyphus without Knees: Exploring Self–Other Relationships through Illness and Disability’. Literature and Medicine, 22(2), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed