Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:12:35.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Valuation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

By
Philip Roscoe
Edited by
Susi Geiger ,
Katy Mason ,
Neil Pollock ,
Philip Roscoe ,
Annmarie Ryan ,
Stefan Schwarzkopf  and
Pascale Trompette
Susi Geiger
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Katy Mason
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Neil Pollock
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Philip Roscoe
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Annmarie Ryan
Affiliation:
University of Limerick
Stefan Schwarzkopf
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Pascale Trompette
Affiliation:
Université de Grenoble
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Market Studies
Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action
 , pp. 161 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Asdal, K. (2018) ‘Interested methods’ and ‘versions of pragmatism’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(4), 748–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, L. (2020) Speculation: a political economy of technologies of imagination. Economy and Society, 49(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuscart, J.-S., and Mellet, K. (2013) Competing quality conventions in the French online display advertising market. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(4), 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S. (2020) Silicon Valley, disruption, and the end of uncertainty. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. R. (2020) Speculating on sovereignty: ‘money mining’ and corporate foreign policy at the extractive industry frontier. Economy and Society, 49(1), 16–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesson, C.-F., Muniesa, F., and Board, E. (2020) Towards a reformulation. Valuation Studies, 7(1), 1–2.Google Scholar
Hitlin, S., and Vaisey, S. (2013) The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homanen, R. (2017) Making valuable mothers in Finland: assessing parenthood in publicly provided maternity healthcare. The Sociological Review, 65(2), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpik, L. (2010) Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macatangay, A. C., and Roscoe, P. (2022) Valuation ruptures: breaking and remaking notions of ‘good’ in a US government agency. The Sociological Review, 70(5), 951–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2011) A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. The Sociological Review, 59(S2), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T. (2016) Valuation struggles over pricing: determining the worth of wind power. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(6), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P. (2015) A moral economy of transplantation: competing regimes of value in the allocation of transplant organs, in Helgesson, C.-F., Lee, F., and Dussauge, I. (eds.), Value Practices in Life Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–118.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Townley, B. (2016) Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(2), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, D. (2009) The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doorn, N., and Velthuis, O. (2018) A good hustle: the moral economy of market competition in adult webcam modeling. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatin, F. (2013) Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. C. (1981) Where do markets come from? American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aspers, P. (2001) A market in vogue: fashion photography in Sweden. European Societies, 3(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspers, P. (2006) Markets in Fashion: A Phenomenological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aspers, P. (2009) Knowledge and valuation in markets. Theory and Society, 38(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain & Company (2017) The global diamond industry 2017: the enduring story in a changing world. 11 December. Available at www.bain.com/insights/global-diamond-industry-report-2017 (accessed 7 January 2023).Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beckert, J. (2011) Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation, Discussion Paper 11/3. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergenstock, D. (2004) An Analysis of the International Diamond Market. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1939) Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dore, R. (1992) Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism, in Granovetter, M., and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 159–181.Google Scholar
Espeland, W., and Stevens, M. (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 312–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Parpet, M.-F. (2008) Markets, prices and symbolic value: grands crus and the challenges of global markets. International Review of Sociology, 18(2), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Parpet, M.-F. (2011) Symbolic value and the establishment of prices: globalization of the wine market, in Aspers, P., and Beckert, J. (eds.), The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–154.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpik, L. (2010) Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpik, L. (2011) What is the price of a scientific paper?, in Aspers, P., and Beckert, J. (eds.), The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–85.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., and Millo, Y. (2003) Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mears, A. (2011) Pricing looks: circuits of value in fashion modelling markets, in Aspers, P., and Beckert, J. (eds.), The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–178.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. (1993) A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenk, P. (2021) Karpik in the bottle: can judgment devices explain the demand for fine wine? Köln Z Soziol, 73, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shield, R. R. (2002) Diamond Stories: Enduring Change on 47th Street. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. (2009) The Mazzel Ritual: Culture, Customs and Crime in the Diamond Trade. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatin, F. (2013) Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2003) Symbolic meanings of prices: constructing the value of contemporary art in Amsterdam and New York galleries. Theory and Society, 32(2), 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2005) Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968 [1922]) Economy and Society. New York: Bedminister Press.Google Scholar
White, H. C. (1981) Where do markets come from? American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. V. (2002) Doctoring Adam Smith: the fable of the diamonds and water paradox. History of Political Economy, 34(4), 659–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ahrne, G., Aspers, P., and Brunsson, N. (2015) The organization of markets. Organization Studies, 36(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. (2010) The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, M., Kusche, F., Hackfort, S., Prause, L., and Engelbrecht-Bock, F. (2023) The making of sustainability: ideological strategies, the materiality of nature, and biomass use in the bioeconomy. Sustainability Science 18, 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredsdorff, M. (2010) Advarsel: biomasse-energi kan forarme skovene [Warning: biomass energy can impoverish the forests]. Ingeniøren, 1 November.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2009) Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callesen, J. M. (2008) Ødelægger biomasse markerne? [Does biomass destroy the fields?]. Ingeniøren, 1 April.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility, in Law, J. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 132–164.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1995) Four models for the dynamics of science, in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: SAGE, 29–63.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, 244–269.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Méadel, C., and Rabeharisoa, V. (2002) The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Concito (2011) Reducerer brug af biomasse atmosfærens indhold af CO2? [Does the use of biomass reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere?], 25 November.Google Scholar
Dansk Fjernvarme (2019) Dansk Fjernvarme deler Klimarådets syn på biomasse [Danish District Heating Association shares the Climate Council’s view on biomass], press release, 29 November.Google Scholar
Djursing, T. (2014) Dansk træpille-bonanza med bind for øjnene: det er alt andet end CO2 neutralt [Danish wood pellet bonanza with blindfolds: it is anything but CO2 neutral]. Ingeniøren, 10 January.Google Scholar
DONG Energy (2017) Sourcing og indkøb af biomasse [Sourcing and purchasing biomass]. 24 October. Available at https://issuu.com/tonnekjaersvej11/docs/sourcing_og_indk__b_af_biomasse-don (accessed 22 July 2023).Google Scholar
EASAC (2017) Multi-functionality and sustainability in the European Union’s forests, Policy Report 32. Halle: EASAC.Google Scholar
EEA (2011) Opinion of the EEA Scientific Committee on greenhouse gas accounting in relation to bioenergy. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
Energiministeriet (1980) Energiplan 81. Copenhagen: Energiministeriet.Google Scholar
Energiministeriet (1983) Energiplanlægning, status note. Copenhagen: Energiministeriet.Google Scholar
Energiministeriet (1990) Energi 2000: en handlingsplan for bæredygtig udvikling [Energy 2000: an action plan for sustainable development]. Copenhagen: Energiministeriet.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (1997) Biomassen i Danmark: mål og midler i Energi 21 [Biomass in Denmark: goals and means in Energy 21], in Bioenergi 97: konferanse-rapport. Oslo: Norsk Bioenergiforening, 53–63.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2012) Energiaftalen 22. marts 2012 [The energy agreement 22 March 2012]. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen. Available at https://ens.dk/ansvarsomraader/energi-klimapolitik/politiske-aftaler-paa-energiomraadet/energiaftalen-22-marts-2012 (accessed 1 May 2024).Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2014) Energiscenarier frem mod 2020, 2035 og 2050 [Energy scenarios towards 2020, 2035 and 2050]. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2016) Danmarks energifortider: hovedbegivenheder på energiområdet [Denmark’s energy past: main events in the energy sector]. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2020) Biomass Analysis. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen. Available at https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Bioenergi/biomasseanalyse_final_ren_eng.pdf (accessed 1 May 2024).Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2021a) Bekendtgørelse om bæredygtighed og besparelse af drivhusgasemissioner for biomassebrændsler og flydende biobrændsler til energiformål, m.v. [Order concerning sustainability and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass fuels and liquid biofuels for energy purposes, etc.], BEK nr 1313 af 14/06/2021. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2021b) Håndbog om opfyldelse af bæredygtighedskrav og krav til reduktion af driv- husgasemissioner for bio- massebrændsler til energiformål [Handbook on meeting sustainability requirements and requirements for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for biomass fuels for energy purposes]. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen.Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen (2023) Annual and monthly statistics. Available at https://ens.dk/en/our-services/statistics-data-key-figures-and-energy-maps/annual-and-monthly-statistics (accessed 22 July 2023).Google Scholar
Energistyrelsen and Miljøministeriet (2001) Vedvarende energi: fokus på biomasse [Sustainable energy: focus on biomass]. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen.Google Scholar
European Union (2009) Renewable Energy Directive (2009/28/EC). Available at http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/28/oj (accessed 22 July 2023).Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N., and Calder, R. (2015) Architecture of markets, in Scott, R. A., and Kosslyn, S. M. (eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley, 1–14.Google Scholar
Fry, I (2002) Twists and turns in the jungle: exploring the evolution of land use, land-use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 11(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R., Gehmand, J., and Karnøe, P. (2010) Categorization by association: nuclear technology and emission-free electricity. Institutions and Entrepreneurship: Research in the Sociology of Work, 21, 51–93.Google Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handelsministeriet (1976) Dansk energipolitik 1976. Copenhagen: Handelsministeriet.Google Scholar
Henningsen, J., and Olesen, J. (2009) Klimakommissionen: Biomasse kan kun dække 20 pct. af energien – hvad gør vi nu? [Climate Commission: biomass can only cover 20 per cent of the energy – what do we do now?]. Ingeniøren, 27 November.Google Scholar
Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark (2006) Ingeniørforeningens energiplan 2030 [The Danish Society of Engineers’ energy plan 2030]. Copenhagen: Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark.Google Scholar
IPCC (2000) IPCC special report: land use, land-use change and forestry: summary for policymakers. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Karnøe, P., Kirkegaard, J., and Çalışkan, K. (2022) Introducing the lens of markets-in-the-making to transition studies: the case of the Danish wind power market agencement. Journal of Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition, 44, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimarådet (2018) Biomassens betydning for grøn omstilling [The significance of biomass for green transition]. Copenhagen: Klimarådet.Google Scholar
Klimarådet (2023) Statusrapport 2023: Danmarks nationale klimamål og internationale forpligtelser [Status report 2023: Denmark’s national climate goals and international obligations]. Copenhagen: Klimarådet.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labussière, O., and Nadaï, A. (2018) How to inquire about energy transition processes?, in Labussière, O., and Nadaï, A. (eds.), Energy Transitions: A Socio-Technical Inquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, L. (2009) Afbrænding af biomasse giver brændte muligheder [The burning of biomass leads to burning one’s options]. Ingeniøren, 22 June.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999) Circulating reference: sampling the soil in the Amazon forest, in Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press, 24–79.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2017) Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Loconto, A., and Busch, L. (2010) Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: performing the global market economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(3), 507–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, H. (2007) Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy, 32(6), 912–919.Google Scholar
Mangset, M., and Asdal, K. (2019) Bureaucratic power in note writing: authoritative expertise within the state. British Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 569–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miljøministeriet and Energiministeriet (1996) Energi 21: regeringens handlingsplan 1996 [Energy 21: the government’s action plan 1996]. Copenhagen: Miljøministeriet.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2001) Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68(2), 379–396.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (1999) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, J. (2018) From numbers to interventions and back: how do accounting facts and management concerns interact?, in Gårseth-Nesbakk, L., and Mellemvik, F. (eds.), Dealing with Expectations and Traditions in Research. Oslo: Cappellen Damm Akademisk, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. (2007) An introduction to market devices, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–13.Google Scholar
Pinch, T., and Bijker, W. (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts, in Bijker, W., Hughes, T., and Pinch, T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 17–50.Google Scholar
Rose, N., and Miller, P. (1992) Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M., and Rosenberg, R. H. (2019) Fire professorer: Danmarks afbrænding af træ er løbet løbsk [Four professors: Denmark’s combustion of wood has gone wild]. Mandag Morgen, 19 August, 1–17.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stissing Jensen, J., and Karnøe, P. (2019) Competing knowledge assemblages in Danish heat governance, in Stissing Jensen, J., Cashmore, M., and Späth, P. (eds.), The Politics of Urban Sustainable Transitions: Knowledge, Power and Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
WCED (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winickoff, D., and Mondou, M. (2017) The problem of epistemic jurisdiction in global governance: the case of sustainability standards for biofuels. Social Studies of Science, 47(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittrup, S. (2013) Opråb: stop nu for den hovedløse brug af biomasse [Outcry: stop the senseless use of biomass now]. Ingeniøren, 19 September.Google Scholar

References

Aitken, R. (2024) ‘Numberless little risks’: ‘tropical exposure’ in globalizing actuarial discourse, 1852–1947. Enterprise & Society, 25(1), 60–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alami, I. (2023) ‘Afro-pessimism’ and emerging markets finance, in Gilbert, P. R., Bourne, C., Haiven, M., and Montgomerie, J. (eds.), The Entangled Legacies of Empire: Race, Finance and Inequality. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 159–170.Google Scholar
Asante, S. K. B. (1988) International law and foreign investment: a reappraisal. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 37(3), 588–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascari, R. (2010) Political risk insurance: an industry in search of a business?, Working Paper 12. Rome: SACE.Google Scholar
Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., Lundblad, C. T., and Siegel, S. (2014) Political risk spreads. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, I., and Johnston, R. (2009) The rise and fall of resource nationalism. Survival, 51(2), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, K. (2010) Market Threads: How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create a Global Commodity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (ed.) (1998) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, A., and Palan, R. (2004) The Imagined Economies of Globalization. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutterbuck, R. (1981) Management of the kidnap risk. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 5(1/2), 125–137.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1971) That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science, 1, 309–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorobantu, F., Dupont, N., and Maniatis, M. (2016) Country risk and damages in investment arbitration. ICSID Review, 31(1), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, N., and Schularick, M. (2006) The empire effect: the determinants of country risk in the first age of globalization, 1880-1913. Journal of Economic History, 66(2), 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. R. (2020a) Speculating on sovereignty: ‘money mining’ and corporate foreign policy at the extractive industry frontier. Economy and Society, 49(1), 16–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. R. (2020b) Expropriating the future: turning ore deposits and legitimate expectations into assets, in Birch, K., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. R. (2020c) Making critical materials valuable: decarbonization, investment and ‘political risk’, in Bleicher, A., and Pehlken, A. (eds.), The Material Basis of Energy Transitions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Renewable Energy and Critical Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. R., and Sklair, J. (2018) Introduction: ethnographic engagements with global elites. Focaal, 81, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. (2017) The politics of finance: cultural economy, cultural studies and the road ahead. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., Nuñez, F., and Popescu, I. (2022) Country risk, in Legum, B. (ed.), The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review, 7th ed. London: Law Business Research, 413–422.Google Scholar
Hossain, K. (1980) Permanent sovereignty over natural resources, in Hossain, K. (ed.), Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order. London: Bloomsbury Academic Collections, 33–43.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. (1982) Managing Political Risk Assessment: Strategic Response to Environmental Change. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (2009) Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2009) Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKittrick, K. (2021) Dear Science and Other Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P., and Napier, C. (1993) Genealogies of calculation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7/8), 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., et al. (2017) Capitalization: A Cultural Guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar
Ortino, F. (2024) The public interest as part of legitimate expectations in investment arbitration: missing in action?, in Brower, C., Donoghue, J., Murphy, C., Payne, C., and Shirlow, E. (eds.), By Peaceful Means: International Adjudication and Arbitration. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, J. (2018) Africa/African, in Desai, G., and Masquelier, A. (eds.), Critical Terms for the Study of Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 12–26.Google Scholar
Pierre, J. (2020) The racial vernaculars of development: a view from west Africa. American Anthropologist, 122(1), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRS Group (2021) Political Risk Assessment: Concept, Method and Management. Mount Pleasant, SC: PRS Group.Google Scholar
Riles, A. (2011) Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, F. (1968) US business abroad and political risks. MSU Business Topics, 16(1), 73–80.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P. (2021) Shouldn’t we all be doing cultural economy? Journal of Cultural Economy, DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2021.1986112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Loza, O. (2019) The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, J. (2015) Numbers by divination: the production of evidence in commercial risk forecasting. Paper presented at American Anthropological Association annual meeting, Denver, CO, 18 November.Google Scholar
Shihata, I. (1986) The settlement of disputes regarding foreign investment: the role of the World Bank with particular reference to ICSID and MIGA. American University Journal of International Law, 1(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
Shortland, A. (2016) Governing kidnap for ransom: Lloyd’s as a ‘private regime’. Governance, 30(2), 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidaway, J. D., Ho, E. L., Rigg, J. D., and Woon, C. Y. (2016) Area studies and geography: trajectories and manifesto. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(5), 777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souleles, D. (2019) The distribution of ignorance on financial markets. Economy and Society, 48(4), 510–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, P. (2015) Why the business of risk is booming. Financial Times, 12 March. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cde4a248-c8ae-11e4-b43b-00144feab7de.html#axzz3iUoFOnUm (accessed 1 May 2024).Google Scholar
Styve, M., and Gilbert, P. R. (2023) ‘The hole in the ground that cannot be moved’: political risk as a racial vernacular of extractive industry development. Extractive Industries and Society, 13, DOI: 10.1016/J.EXIS.2022.101100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C. (2015) Risky business: political risk insurance and the law and governance of natural resources. International Journal of Law in Context, 11(2), 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. (2014) Political risk is now a growth industry in its own right. Financial Times, 28 September. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1b94922-3765-11e4-8472-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz3iUoFOnUm (accessed 1 May 2024).Google Scholar
Trouillot, M.-R. (2021 [1990]) Good day Columbus: silences, power and public history (1492–1892), in Trouillot, M.-R., Bonilla, Y., Beckett, G., and Fernando, M. (eds.), Trouillot Remixed: The Michel-Rolph Trouillot Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 103–125.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2020) World Investment Report 2020: International Production beyond the Pandemic. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
UNGA (1984) Progressive development of the principles and norms of international law relating to the new international economic order, A/39/504/Add.1. New York: United Nations. Available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/71137?ln=en (accessed 11 November 2021).Google Scholar
Van der Heide, A. (2020) Model migration and rough edges: British actuaries and the ontologies of modelling. Social Studies of Science, 50(1), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Harten, G. (2016) Who has benefited financially from treaty arbitration? An evaluation of the size and wealth of claimants, Legal Research Paper 135. Toronto: Osgoode Hall Law School, York University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, I. (2018) Possibilities of the past: histories of the NIEO and the travails of critique. Journal of the History of International Law, 20(3), 263–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H. (2015) Isis shows ‘Oriental studies’ are essential. Times Higher Education, 19 February. Available at www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/isis-shows-oriental-studies-are-essential/2018567.article (accessed 1 May 2024).Google Scholar
Wilson, R. (2002) Imagining ‘Asia-Pacific’ today: forgetting colonialism in the magical free markets of the American Pacific, in Miyoshi, M., and Harootunian, H. D. (eds.), Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 231–260.Google Scholar

References

Asdal, K. (2018) ‘Interested methods’ and ‘versions of pragmatism’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(4), 748–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, T., and Nelson, R. E. (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, J., and Musselin, C. (2013) Introduction, in Beckert, J., and Musselin, C. (eds.), Constructing Quality: The Classification of Goods in Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanova, E. (2013) Account of the past: mechanisms of quality construction in the market for antiques, in Beckert, J., and Musselin, C. (eds.), Constructing Quality: The Classification of Goods in Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153–173.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Delsaut, Y. (1975) Le couturier et sa griffe: contribution à une théorie de la magie. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1(1), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007) Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Colville-Andersen, M. (2018) Copenhagenize: The Definitive Guide to Global Bicycle Urbanism. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coslor, E. (2016) Transparency in an opaque market: evaluative frictions between ‘thick’ valuation and ‘thin’ price data in the art market. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, E. (2016) Exemplary goods: exemplars as judgment devices. Valuation Studies, 4(2), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duymedjian, R., and Rüling, C.-C. (2010) Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, J. (2011) Pedalare! Pedalare! London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. R. (2020) Speculating on sovereignty: ‘money mining’ and corporate foreign policy at the extractive industry frontier. Economy and Society, 49(1), 16–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, B. J. (2014) Cycling nostalgia: authenticity, tourism and social critique in Tuscany. Sport in History, 34(2), 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Ahamed, F., Akhter, N., and Ferdous, R. (2010) Following things of rubbish value: end-of-life ships, ‘chock-chocky’ furniture and the Bangladeshi middle class consumer. Geoforum, 41(6), 846–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgadóttir, O. (2023) The new luxury freeports: offshore storage, tax avoidance, and ‘invisible’ art. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(4), 1020–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesson, C.-F., Muniesa, F., and Board, E. (2020) Towards a reformulation. Valuation Studies, 7(1), 1–2.Google Scholar
Heuts, F., and Mol, A. (2013) What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homanen, R. (2017) Making valuable mothers in Finland: assessing parenthood in publicly provided maternity healthcare. The Sociological Review, 65(2), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpik, L. (2010) Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, I. (1986) The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2002) The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. (2021 [1962]) Wild Thought: A New Translation of La Pensée sauvage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macatangay, A. C., and Roscoe, P. (2022) Valuation ruptures: breaking and remaking notions of ‘good’ in a US government agency. The Sociological Review, 70(5), 951–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, L. (2014) The problem of cultural intermediaries in the economy of qualities, in Maguire, J., and Matthews, J. (eds.), The Cultural Intermediaries Reader. London: SAGE, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, J., and Matthews, J. (2012) Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2011) A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. The Sociological Review, 59(S2), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T., and Bijker, W. E. (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, M., Free, C., and Andon, P. (2021) Making artworks valuable: categorisation and modes of valuation work. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91, DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2020.101155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, N., D’Adderio, L., Williams, R., and Leforestier, L. (2018) Conforming or transforming? How organizations respond to multiple rankings. Accounting, Organizations and Society 64, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P. (2014) I Spend Therefore I Am: How Economics Has Changed the Way We Think and Feel. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Rosen, P. (1993) The social construction of mountain bikes: technology and postmodernity in the cycle industry. Social Studies of Science, 23(3), 479–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidwells, C. (2016) Eroica rides: the growing popularity of retro bikes. Cycling Weekly, 5 October. Available at www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/eroica-rides-the-growing-popularity-of-retro-bikes-288559 (accessed 9 August 2023).Google Scholar
Townley, B., Roscoe, P., and Searle, N. (2019) Creating Economy: Enterprise, Intellectual Property and the Valuation of Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vatin, F. (2013) Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2011) Damien’s dangerous idea: valuing contemporary art at auction, in Aspers, P., and Beckert, J. (eds.), The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 178–200.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.C., Velis, C., and Cheeseman, C. (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 30(4), 797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aspers, P. (2006) Markets in Fashion: A Phenomenological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The market of symbolic goods, in The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press, 112–141.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998) The embeddedness of economic markets in economics, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–58.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2017) Afterword: the devices of attachment, in Cochoy, F., Deville, J., and McFall, L. (eds.), Markets and the Arts of Attachment. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007) Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. (2005) Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Deville, J., and McFall, L. (eds.) (2017) Markets and the Arts of Attachment. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1939) Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. (2001) Music lovers: taste as performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. (2004) Pragmatics of taste, in Jacobs, M. D., and Hanrahan, N. W. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 131–144.Google Scholar
Hennion, A. (2015) The Passion for Music: A Sociology of Mediation. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Heuts, F., and Mol, A. (2013) What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, M., and Stark, D. (2015) Pragmatist perspectives on valuation: an introduction, in Antal, A. B., Hutter, M., and Stark, D. (eds.), Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, H. (2017) Acquiring associations, in Cochoy, F., Deville, J., and McFall, L. (eds.), Markets and the Arts of Attachment. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., Madsen, A. K., and Mouritsen, J. (eds.) (2015) Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1986) The powers of association, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 264–280.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1988) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1991) Introduction: monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations, in Law, J. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 1–23.Google Scholar
McFall, L. (2009) Devices and desires: how useful is the ‘new’ new economic sociology for understanding market attachment? Sociology Compass, 3(2), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2011) A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. The Sociological Review, 59(S2), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., and Helgesson, C.-F. (2013). Valuation studies and the spectacle of valuation. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T., and Bijserveld, K. (eds.) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. (1993) A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. (2010) How Music Works: The Science and Psychology of Beautiful Sounds, from Beethoven to the Beatles and Beyond. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Loza, O. (2019) The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, O. (2013) Bending forward, one step backward: on the sociology of tasting techniques. Cultural Sociology, 7(4), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teil, G. (2021) Amateurs’ exploration of wine: a pragmatic study of taste. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(5), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trébuchet-Breitwiller, A.-S. (2015) Making things precious: a pragmatist inquiry into the valuation of luxury perfumes, in Antal, A. B., Hutter, M., and Stark, D. (eds.), Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. C. (1993) Values come in styles, which mate to change, in Hechter, M., Nadel, L., and Michod, R. E. (eds.), The Origin of Values. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 63–91.Google Scholar
White, H. C. (2002) Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A. (1978) Human values and the market: the case of life insurance and death in 19th-century America. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 591–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelizer, V. A. (1994) The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×