Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:11:45.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Noninvasive Morphological Selection of Oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2023

Catherine Racowsky
Affiliation:
Hôpital Foch, France
Jacques Cohen
Affiliation:
IVF 2.0, New York
Nicholas Macklon
Affiliation:
London Women's Clinic
Get access

Summary

Gamete and embryo selection finalization for the improvement of clinical efficiency and efficacy represents the “holy grail” of assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Embryos are routinely assessed and selected or ranked for embryo transfer on the basis of static or dynamic morphological criteria or, less frequently, their chromosomal status. Sperm are also subject to methods of isolation from semen to pre-select a population with improved motility and morphology to maximise the chances of fertilisation. Oocyte selection, i.e. selective use based on different morphological patterns which are presumed to be prognostic of different developmental potential, is a less accepted and practiced concept in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) laboratories. Two major reasons concur to make oocyte selection controversial: i) the usually limited number of oocytes retrieved in each ovarian stimulation cycles; ii) the uncertainty of possible associations between different dysmorphisms and downstream impacts on laboratory or clinical outcomes. Oocyte dysmorphisms can affect both the intra- and extracellular morphological domains of the mature oocyte. Oocyte abnormalities can also occur with different degrees of severity and different localisations. In addition, in the absence of specific non-invasive markers, some types of dysmorphisms may be difficult to discriminate by simple morphological observation. All these factors complicate oocyte morphological selection according to appropriate standards of reproducibility and precision, preventing its adoption as a universally accepted procedure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–83.Google Scholar
Griffin, J, Emery, BR, Huang, I, Peterson, CM, Carrell, DT. Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human). J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2006;3:2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:494510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montag, M, Köster, M, van der Ven, K, van der Ven, H. Gamete competence assessment by polarizing optics in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:654–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebner, T, Shebl, O, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Tews, G. Developmental fate of ovoid oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:62–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Weghofer, A, Kushnir, VA, Darmon, SK, Jafri, H, Lazzaroni-Tealdi, E, Zhang, L, et al. Age, body weight and ovarian function affect oocyte size and morphology in non-PCOS patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0222390.Google Scholar
Machtinger, R, Politch, JA, Hornstein, MD, Ginsburg, ES, Racowsky, C. A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome? Fertil Steril. 2011;95:573–6.Google Scholar
Rosenbusch, B, Schneider, M, Gläser, B, Brucker, C. Cytogenetic analysis of giant oocytes and zygotes to assess their relevance for the development of digynic triploidy. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2388–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rienzi, L, Vajta, G, Ubaldi, F. Predictive value of oocyte morphology in human IVF: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:3445.Google Scholar
Sauerbrun-Cutler, MT, Vega, M, Breborowicz, A, Gonzales, E, Stein, D, Lederman, M, Keltz, M. Oocyte zona pellucida dysmorphology is associated with diminished in-vitro fertilization success. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, W, Xu, B, Wu, LM, Jin, RT, Luan, HB, Luo, LH, et al. Oocytes with a dark zona pellucida demonstrate lower fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, M, Teixeira da, SJ, Silva, J, Cunha, M, Viana, P, Oliveira, E, et al. Embryological, clinical and ultrastructural study of human oocytes presenting indented zona pellucida. Zygote. 2015;23:145–57.Google Scholar
Balaban, B, Urman, B, Sertac, A, Alatas, C, Aksoy, S, Mercan, R. Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3431–3.Google Scholar
Ten, J, Mendiola, J, Vioque, J, de Juan, J, Bernabeu, R. Donor oocyte dysmorphisms and their influence on fertilization and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:40–8.Google Scholar
Chamayou, S, Ragolia, C, Alecci, C, Storaci, G, Maglia, E, Russo, E, Guglielmino, A. Meiotic spindle presence and oocyte morphology do not predict clinical ICSI outcomes: a study of 967 transferred embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:661–7.Google Scholar
Ferrarini Zanetti, B, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, D, Souza Setti, A, de Cássia Sávio Figueira, R, Iaconelli, A, Borges, E. Is perivitelline space morphology of the oocyte associated with pregnancy outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;231:225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan-Ali, H, Hisham-Saleh, A, El-Gezeiry, D, Baghdady, I, Ismaeil, I, Mandelbaum, J. Perivitelline space granularity: a sign of human menopausal gonadotrophin overdose in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3425–30.Google Scholar
Jo, YJ, Jang, WI, Namgoong, S, Kim, NH. Actin-capping proteins play essential roles in the asymmetric division of maturing mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:160–70.Google Scholar
Sanfins, A, Plancha, CE, Overstrom, EW, Albertini, DF. Meiotic spindle morphogenesis in in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: insights into the relationship between nuclear and cytoplasmic quality. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2889–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciotti, PM, Notarangelo, L, Morselli-Labate, AM, Felletti, V, Porcu, E, Venturoli, S. First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2334–9.Google Scholar
Verlinsky, Y, Lerner, S, Illkevitch, N, Kuznetsov, V, Kuznetsov, I, Cieslak, J, Kuliev, A. Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:336–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebner, T, Yaman, C, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Feichtinger, O, Tews, G. Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:427–30.Google Scholar
Ebner, T, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Yaman, C, Pfleger, U, Tews, G. First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2415–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebner, T, Moser, M, Yaman, C, Feichtinger, O, Hartl, J, Tews, G. Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:599603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rienzi, L, Ubaldi, FM, Iacobelli, M, Minasi, MG, Romano, S, Ferrero, S, et al. Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:16921700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, M, Cunha, M, Silva, J, Oliveira, E, Pinho, MJ, Almeida, C, et al. Ultrastructural and cytogenetic analyses of mature human oocyte dysmorphisms with respect to clinical outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1041–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebner, T, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Gaiswinkler, U, Shebl, O, Jesacher, K, Tews, G. Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1635–40.Google Scholar
De Sutter, P, Dozortsev, D, Qian, C, Dhont, M. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:595–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuki, J, Nagai, Y, Chiba, K. Lipofuscin bodies in human oocytes as an indicator of oocyte quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:263–70.Google Scholar
Setti, AS, Figueira, RC, Braga, DP, Colturato, SS, Iaconelli, AJ, Borges, EJ. Relationship between oocyte abnormal morphology and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:364–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serhal, PF, Ranieri, DM, Kinis, A, Marchant, S, Davies, M, Khadum, IM. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1267–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otsuki, J, Okada, A, Morimoto, K, Nagai, Y, Kubo, H. The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1591–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akarsu, C, Cağlar, G, Vicdan, K, Sözen, E, Biberoğlu, K. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregations in all retrieved oocytes causing recurrent multiple anomalies: case report. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1496.e1–e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateizel, I, Van, LL, Tournaye, H, Verheyen, G. Deliveries of normal healthy babies from embryos originating from oocytes showing the presence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2111–17.Google Scholar
Shaw-Jackson, C. Implications on IVF patient care of discarding oocytes affected by smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates as recommended by the Alpha/ESHRE consensus. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1705–6.Google Scholar
Shaw-Jackson, C, Thomas, AL, Van, BN, Ameye, L, Colin, J, Bertrand, E, et al. Oocytes affected by smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates: to discard or not to discard? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:175–84.Google Scholar
Lazzaroni-Tealdi, E, Barad, DH, Albertini, DF, Yu, Y, Kushnir, VA, Russell, H, et al. Oocyte scoring enhances embryo-scoring in predicting pregnancy chances with IVF where it counts most. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolacci, A, Intra, G, Coticchio, G, Aquila, M dell’, Patria, G, Borini, A. Does morphological assessment predict oocyte developmental competence? A systematic review and proposed score. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2022;39:3–17.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×