References

David R. Olson

doi:10.1017/9781009064569.016

Amsterdam, J. G. & Bruner, J. S. (2000). Minding the law: How courts rely on storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anton, C. (2017). Alphabetic print-based literacy, hermeneutic sociality, and philosophic culture. Review of Communication, 17, 257–272.Google Scholar

Apperly, I. A. (2008). Beyond simulation-theory and theory-theory: Why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “theory of mind.” Cognition, 107, 266–283.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1954). The crisis in education: Between past and future. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Astington, J. & Gopnik, A. (1988). Knowing you have changed your mind: Children’s understanding of representational change. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W. (1996). What is theoretical about the child’s theory of mind? A Vygotskian view of its development. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W. (1998). Theory of mind, Humpty Dumpty, and the icebox. Human Development, 41, 30–39.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1953). Mimesis: The representation of reality in Western literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Baecker, R. (2019). Computers in society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants. Cognition, 23, 21–41.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baressi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beal, C. (1990). Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension. Child Development, 61, 1011-1023.Google Scholar

Bellugi, U. (1967). The acquisition of the system of negation in children’s speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central themes. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Bogden, R. (2009). Predicative minds: The social ontogeny of propositional thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brantley, R. E. (1984). Locke, Wesley, and the method of English Romanticism. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar

Brentano, R. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (Kraus, O., Ed.). London: RKP. (Original published in 1874.)Google Scholar

Brown, A. (1975). The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1956). Appendix. In Bruner, J.S., Goodnow, J. & Austin, G. (Ed.), A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A study of thinking with an appendix by R. Brown. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing (Anglin, J., Ed.). London: George Allen.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking (With an appendix on language by R. W. Brown). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (1996). Language, thought and consciousness: An essay in philosophical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2017). Chinese reading development: The contributions of linguistic and cognitive factors. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (May 15, 1969). Knowledge of language. Times Literary Supplement, p. 523Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 167–175.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (1994). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky philosophy and education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (2004). Discourse on method (J. Veitch, Trans.). London: Orion. (Original published in 1637.)Google Scholar

de Waal, F. (1999). Anthromorphism and anthropodeenial: Consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27, 255–280.Google Scholar

Dickson, P. (1981). Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

diSessa, A. (1985). Learning about knowing. New Directions for Cognitive Development, 28, 997–1024.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. (1993). Frege: Philosophy of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Easterly, W. (October 8, 2009). The anarchy of success. New York Review of Books, 56, 28–30.Google Scholar

Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Egner, T., Monti, J. M., & Summerfield, C. (2010). Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(49), 16601–16608.Google Scholar

Ehri, L. & Wilce, L. (1980). The influence of orthography on reader’s conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371–385.Google Scholar

Engleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The secret lives of the brain. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Erneling, C. (2010). Towards a discursive education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, C. (1987). Thought from language: The linguistic construction of cognitive representations. In Bruner, J. S. & Haste, H. (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. New York: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. (pp. 35–60) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1972). Some reflections on L. S. Vygotsky’s Language and Thought. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 83–95.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar

Francis, N. (2019). Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis. Writing Systems Research, 11(2), 176–187.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar

Gleitman, L. (1986). Biological dispositions to learn language. In Demopoulos, W. & Marras, A. (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational Issues. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar

Gleitman, Lila R. (1990). The structural source of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1 (1): 3–55.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.Google Scholar

Goldman, S. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A., & Shanton, K. (2010). Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 527–538.Google Scholar

Goody, E. N. (1978). Towards a theory of questions. In Goody, E. N. (Ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and it relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observation on a simple view of reading. In Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Green, M. (1996). A rereading of Dewey’s art as experience. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds.), The Handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, S. (1988). Children’s awareness of their inner world. Unpublished PhD thesis, OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1996). Normal people. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Modes of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, P. L. (2020). The point, the shrug, and the question of clarification. In Butler, L. P., Ronfard, S., and Corriveau, K. H. (Eds.), The questioning child: Insights from psychology and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herbart, J. (1898). The application of psychology to the science of education. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Heath, J. (2011). Following the rules: Practical reasoning and the deontic constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hinton, G. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 428–434.Google Scholar

Hinton, G. (2014). Where do features come from? Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1078–1101.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1993). Enquiries concerning human understanding (Steinberg, E., Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J. (1964). Children’s language: Word-phrase relationships. Science, 143, 264–265.Google Scholar

Illich, I. (1991). A plea for research on lay literacy. In Olson, D. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Literacy and orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (2012). A users guide to thought and meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacob, P. (1997). What minds can do: Intentionality in a non-intentional world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890/2007). The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar

Janack, M. (2012). What we mean by experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. (1988). Theories of mind and the structure of conscious experience. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N., & Maratsos, M. P. (1977). Early comprehensions of mental verbs: Think and know. Child Development, 48, 1743–1747.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Toronto, ON: Penguin.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Katz, J., & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of semantic theory. Language, 39, 170–210.Google Scholar

Kendler, T., & Kendler, H. (1959). Reversal and nonreversal shifts in kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 56–60.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. (Eds.), Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity. Lakeville: The International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kramer, S. (2012). The ‘eye of the mind’ and the eye of the body; Descartes and Leibniz on truth, mathematics and visuality. In Barth, F. G., Deutsch, P. G., & Klein, H. D. (Eds.), Sensory perception: Mind and matter (pp. 369–382). Wien, Austria: Springer.Google Scholar

Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, 31, 32–59.Google Scholar

Lagemann, E. C. (2000). The elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion.Google Scholar

Lee, E. (1995). Young children’s representational understanding of intention. Unpublished PhD, OISE, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Lee, C., White, G., & Dong, D. (Eds.). (2021). Executive Summary. Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Committee on Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar

Lee, E., Torrance, N., & Olson, D. R. (2001). Young children and the say/mean distinction: Verbatim and paraphrase recognition in narrative and nursery rhyme contexts. Journal of Child Language, 28, 531–543.Google Scholar

Lemann, N. (2020). Can Journalism be saved? New York Review of Books, LXVII, February 27, 2020.Google Scholar

Lepore, J. (2020). The isolation ward: On loneliness. The New Yorker, April 6, 2020, 62–64.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–429.Google Scholar

Levesque, H. (2017). Common sense, the Turing Test and the quest for real AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levine, T. (2019). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. (2014). The rise of consciousness and the development of emotional life. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Liublinskaya, A. A. (1957). The development of children’s speech and thought. In Simon, B. (Ed.), Psychology in the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1829), An essay concerning human understanding. London: Thomas Tegg. (Originally published in 1689).Google Scholar

Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2016). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognition vocabulary. Metacognition Learning, 1, 15–31.Google Scholar

MacDonald, P. (2012). Languages of intentionality. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Macnamara, J. (1986). A border dispute: The place of logic in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (Supplementary essays). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Malvestuto-Filice, G. R. (1986). The development of the understanding of the intentional predicates “pretend” and “imagine”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1976). Children’s difficulty with the word-referent differentiation. Child Development, 47, 742–749.Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing you don’t understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. (pp. 61–82). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McDougall, W. (1911). Body and mind. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Miller, C. (2018). The death of the gods: A new global power grab. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Miller, G. (1979). Images, models, similes and metaphors. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Misak, S. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, D. E. (2005). The developmental origins of meaning for mental terms. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morrison, K. F. (1990). History as a visual art in the Twelfth-Century Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.Google Scholar

Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253.Google Scholar

National Centre for Educational Statistics (2010). The nation’s report card: Graade 12 reading and mathematics 2009 national and pilot state results (NCES 2011-455). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (1992) Best laid schemes: The psychology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions. In Martin, L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect and self-regulation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77(4), 257–273.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1975). Review of Carroll, J. B. & Chall, J. “Toward a literate society”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Education, (Vol. 2, pp. 109–178). Stanford: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1989). Making up your mind: Presidential address to the Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology, 30, 17–27.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2007). The self-ascription of intention: Responsibility, obligation and self-control. Synthese, 159, 297–314.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1986). Children’s acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In Demopoulos, W. & Marras, A. (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (2013). Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth. First Language, 33, 617–627.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Campbell, R. (1993). Constructing representations. In Pratt, C. & Garton, A. F. (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use (pp. 11–26). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Filby, N. (1972). On the comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 361–381.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Kamawar, D. (2002). Writing as a form of quotation. In Brockmeier, J., Wang, M. & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Oatley, K. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31, 4–26.Google Scholar

Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface. Cognition, 86, 253-282.Google Scholar

Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early childhood. In Olson, D. R. (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Pearson, P. D. (2014). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18, 216–222.Google Scholar

Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. (Eds.) (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. Washington: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Peskin, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19, 253–273.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.Google Scholar

Proust, J. (2014). The philosophy of metacognition: Mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (2021). The dark history of school choice. New York: New York Review of Books, LXVIII, 36–38.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics & the human sciences. (J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, E., Goelman, H., & Olson, D. R. (1983). Children’s understanding of the relationship between expressions (what is said) and intentions (what is meant). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 75–86.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rozeboom, W. (1972). Problems in the psycho-philosophy of knowledge. In Royce, J. & Rozeboom, W. (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar

Russell, R. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limitations. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1958). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Duckworth. (Original published in 1916).Google Scholar

Schachter, S. & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State (PDF). Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. doi:10.1037/h0046234.Google Scholar

Scherer, K., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 719–745.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major implications for education. Mind, Brain and Education, 2, 114–121.Google Scholar

Seabrook, J. (2019). The next word: Where will predictive text take us? The New Yorker, October 14, p. 63.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Introduction by Rorty, R. and study guide by Brandom, R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1956).Google Scholar

Share, D. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 512.Google Scholar

Sliwa, P. (2015). Understanding and knowing. Proceedings of the Aristotlian Society, CXV, Part I.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.Google Scholar

Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 1, 214–241.Google Scholar

Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. (1677/1901). Improvement of the understanding, ethics and correspondence. Washington: Walter Dunne, Publisher.Google Scholar

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2006). The Turing Test.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. (2008). Real materialism and other essays. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Sun, J., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J. A., Lin, T.-J., Miller, B. W., Ma, S., Kim, T., & Scott, T. (2017). Children’s engagement and affect during Collaborative Learning and Direct Instruction. (Unpublished).Google Scholar

Sutscover, I. (2019). Interview. The New Yorker, October 14. (See Seebrook, 2019).Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Torrance, N. G., & Olson, D. R. (1987). Development of the metalanguage and the acquisition of literacy. Interchange, 18, 136–146.Google Scholar

Tunmer, W. E., & Herriman, M. L. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: A conceptual overview. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C., & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children; theory, research, and implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. (p. 442).Google Scholar

Turing Test. (2006). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Wikipedia).Google Scholar

Turner, N., & Thomas, F.-N. (2011). Clear and simple as the truth: Writing about prose. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Kozulin, A., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wason, P. (1980). The verification task and beyond. In Olson, D. R. (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Welllman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. (2000). Vygotsky’s two minds on the nature of meaning. In Bechtel, W. & Graham, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, J., & Sodian, B. (1988). A second stage in children’s conception of mental life: Understanding informational accesses as origins of knowledge and belief. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Zelazo, P., & Jacques, S. (1996). Children’s rules use: Representation, reflection and cognitive control. Annals of Child Development, 12, 119–176.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive