Book contents
- The Making of a Dialogical Theory
- The Making of a Dialogical Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Development and Diversification of the Theory of Social Representations and Communication
- Part II The Dialogical Perspective of the Theory of Social Representations and Communication
- Afterword
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2023
Book contents
- The Making of a Dialogical Theory
- The Making of a Dialogical Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Development and Diversification of the Theory of Social Representations and Communication
- Part II The Dialogical Perspective of the Theory of Social Representations and Communication
- Afterword
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Making of a Dialogical TheorySocial Representations and Communication, pp. 267 - 298Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abric, J.-C. (1976). Jeux, conflits et représentations sociales. Thèse d’Etat. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (Ed.). (1994a). Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (1994b). L’organisation interne des représentations sociales: système central et système périphérique. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.). Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (1996). Prefácio. In Sá, C. P. (Ed.). Núcleo central das representações sociais. Petrópolis: Vozes, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
de Alba, M. (2007). Mapas imaginarios del Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México: de la experiencia al imaginario urbano. In Arruda, A. and de Alba, M. (Eds.). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona, Spain: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 285–319.Google Scholar
Albarghouthi, S. I., and Klempe, S. H. (2019). ‘Al-Khabith’ – The malignant cunning disease: Sociocultural complexity and social representations of cancer in the occupied Palestinian territory. Culture & Psychology, 25: 99–131.Google Scholar
Allansdottir, A., Jovchelovitch, S., and Stathopoulou, A. (1993). Social representations: The versatility of the concept. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 3–10.Google Scholar
Allport, G. (1954/1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
Andreouli, E. (2010). Identity, positioning and self–other relations. Papers on Social Representations, 19(1): 14.1–14.13.Google Scholar
, Aristotle. (1998). The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. and Eds. Ross, W. D., Ackrill, J. L., and Urmson, J. O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arruda, A. (2015). Image, social imaginary and social representations. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–142.Google Scholar
Arruda, A., and de Alba, M. (2007). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona: UAM-Anthropos.Google Scholar
Arruda, A., Gonçalves, L. V. P., and Mululo, S. C. C. (2008). Traveling with students through Brazilian varieties: Social representations and stereotypes. Psicologia em Estudo, 13(3): 513–522.Google Scholar
Arruda, A., and Ulup, L. (2007). Brasil imaginado: representaciones sociales de jovenes universitarios. In Arruda, A. and de Alba, M. (Eds.). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41: 258–290.Google Scholar
Atkin, A. (2013). Peirce’s theory of signs. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2013 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M. (2019). Dialoguing the difference: A reply to Batel and Castro’s ‘Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58: 423–427.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1919/1990). Art and answerability. In Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V. (Eds.). Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1920–1923/1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity. In Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V. (Eds.). Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 4–256.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/1986). Response to a question from Novy Mir editorial staff. In Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (Eds.). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Trans. McGee, V. W.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981a). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (Ed.). The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 259–422.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M (1981b). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Towards a historical poetics. In Holquist, M. (Ed.). The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 84–258.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed. and trans. Emerson, C.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Towards a Philosophy of the Act. Ed. Liapunov, V. and Holquist, M.. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1932/1995). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An Experimental and Social Study. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bastide, R. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. L’Année Sociologique, 21: 247–249.Google Scholar
Batel, S. (2012). Commentary on (re)presenting (and) cognitive polyphasia. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 10.1–10.15.Google Scholar
Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2009). Reification and consensualization in communication: An analysis of the impacts of two distinctive discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39: 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2018). Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57: 732–753.Google Scholar
Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2019). Commentary – Still a matter of dialogue: A response to Potter’s, Augoustinos’s, and Jovchelovitch’s commentaries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58: 428–434.Google Scholar
Baubion-Broye, A., Lapeyre, M., and Malrieu, P. (1977). Remarques sur la notion de représentation sociale. Psychologie et Éducation, 3: 37–56.Google Scholar
Baucal, A., Gillespie, A., Krstić, K., and Zittoun, T. (2020). Reproducibility in psychology: Theoretical distinction of different types of replication. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54: 152–157.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29: 163–186.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 335–353.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1936/1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Arendt, H. (Ed.). Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Trans. Zohn, H.. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 217–251.Google Scholar
Berger, A. A. (2020). Humor, Psyche and Society: A Socio-semiotic Analysis. Delaware: Vernon Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P., and Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will. Trans. Pogson, E. L.. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1932/1935). Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bianco, G., and Fruteau de Laclos, F. (Eds.). (2016). L’angle mort des années 1950. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1988). Social representations, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3: 1–16.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric and attitudes. In Breakwell, G. M. and Canter, D. V. (Eds.). Empirical Approaches to Social Representations. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2008). Social representations and repression: Examining the first formulations of Freud and Moscovici. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 355–368.Google Scholar
Bonnell, V. E. (1997). Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters under Lenin and Stalin. Beverley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boulanger, D. (2017a). Extending social representation theory through dialogical self theory: Subjects’ and alter’s relating with space. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 9–33.Google Scholar
Boulanger, D. (2017b). Conclusion of Special Issue: Linking two theories. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 193–222.Google Scholar
Boulanger, D., and Valsiner, J. (2017). Linking two theories: How can the social representations theory be made dialogical? International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 1–8.Google Scholar
Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 271–284.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2001). In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 305–311.Google Scholar
Brook, A. (1992). Psychoanalysis and commonsense psychology. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 20: 273–303.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2020). Henri Tajfel: Explorer of Identity and Difference. Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1974). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Buschini, F., and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). (2001). Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, D., and Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of Art. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillaud, S. (2016). A dialogical approach to the ecological crisis. Papers on Social Representations, 25(1): 6.1–6.30.Google Scholar
Caillaud, S., Doumergue, M., Prau, M., Haas, V., and Kalampalikis, N. (2019). The past and present of triangulation and social representations theory: A crossed history. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16: 375–391.Google Scholar
Camargo, B. V. (2007). O que o caminho interdisciplinar brasileiro da teoria das representações sociais não favorece? In Moreira, A. S. P. and Camargo, B. V. (Orgs). Contribuições para a teoria e o método de estudo das representações sociais. João Pessoa: Editora Universitária da UFPB, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Camargo, B. V. (2016). Um primeiro estudo histórico e conceitual do seminário Epistemologia e representações sociais’, conduzido por Serge Moscovici e Denise Jodelet em 1994. Psicologia e Saber Social, 5(1): 5–17.Google Scholar
Capecchi, D. (2017). Experiments, mathematics and principles of natural philosophy in the epistemology of Giovanni Battista Baliani. Advances in Historical Studies, 6: 78–94. doi: 10.4236/ahs.2017.62006.Google Scholar
Cartwright, D. (1948). Social psychology in the US during the Second World War. Human Relations, 1: 333–352.Google Scholar
Cartwright, D. (1979). Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42: 82–93.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1932/2013). Language and the construction of the world of objects. In Ernst Cassirer: The Warburg Years (1919–1933). Trans. and with an Introduction by Lofts, S. G. with Calcagno, A.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 334–362.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1950). The Problem of Knowledge. Trans. Woglom, W. H. and Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 1. Trans. Mainheim, R.; Preface and Introduction by Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 3. Trans. Mainheim, R.; introductory note by Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1996). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 4. Eds. Krois, J. M. and Verene, D. P.. Trans. Krois, J. M.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (2005). Vorlesungen und Studien zur Philosophischen Anthropologie. Ed. Hartung, G. and Kopp-Oberstebring, H.. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Castro, P. (2015). Social representations of sustainability: Researching time, institution, conflict and communication. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–308.Google Scholar
Castro, P., and Batel, S. (2008). Social representation, change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychology, 14: 475–497.Google Scholar
Chauhan, A. (2016). Developing a Social Psychology of Poverty: Social Objects and Dialogical Representations, PhD thesis. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Class, M. (2014). Introduction. Medical case histories as genres: New approaches. Literature and Medicine, 32: vii–xvi.Google Scholar
Collins, S., and Marková, I. (2004). Les énoncés collaboratifs: une nouvelle méthode dans l’étude des focus groups. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57: 291–298.Google Scholar
Colville, I., Brown, A. D., and Pye, A. (2009). Human Relations special issue call for papers: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling. Human Relations, 62: 1581–1583.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1908/1987). Microcosmographia Academica being a Guide for the Young Academic Politician. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (2020). Towards a dialogical methodology for single case studies. Culture and Psychology, 26: 139–152.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (2021). ‘Grenfell changes everything?’ Activism beyond hope and despair. Critical Public Health, 31: 293–305.Google Scholar
von Cranach, M. (1992). The multi-level organisation of knowledge and action. In von Cranach, M., Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Social Bases of Knowledge. Lewiston, Toronto, and Bern: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, pp. 10–22.Google Scholar
Crasnow, S. (2010). Evidence for use: Causal pluralism and the role of case studies in political science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, XX: 1–24.Google Scholar
Crasnow, S. (2012). The role of case study research in political science: Evidence for causal claims. Philosophy of Science, 79: 655–666.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, M., Fioretti, C., Mannarini, T., and Salvatore, S. (Eds.). (2021). Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. (1995). Commitments and styles of European scientific thinking. History of Science, 33: 225–238.Google Scholar
Czismas, M. (1971). Cybernetics – Marxism – Jurisprudence. Studies in Soviet Thought, 11: 90–108.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of the centre and periphery as a universal. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2: 9–21.Google Scholar
Davies, B., and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20: 43–63.Google Scholar
Dawson, P., and Sykes, C. (2016). Organizational Change and Temporality: Bending the Arrow of Time. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dawson, P., and Sykes, C. (2019). Concepts of time and temporality in the storytelling and sensemaking literatures: A review and critique. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21: 97–114.Google Scholar
Deaux, K., and Philogène, G. (2001). (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Bie, P., Lévi-Strauss, C., Nuttin, J., and Jacobson, E. (1954). Les Sciences Sociales dans l’enseignement supérieur; Sociologie, Psychologie Sociale et Anthropologie Culturelle (Social sciences in higher education: sociology, social psychology, and cultural anthropology). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Deriabin, A., and Gergen, K. (1997). http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/mosc1msg.txtGoogle Scholar
Doise, W. (1985). Les représentations sociales. Definition d’un concept. Connexions, 45: 243–253.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1986). Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1990). Les représentations sociales. In Bonnet, C., Ghiglione, R., and Richard, T. F. (Eds.). Traité de psychologie cognitive. Vol. iii. Paris: Dunod, pp. 111–174.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (2001). Human rights studied as normative social representations. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 96–112.Google Scholar
Doise, W., Clémence, A., and Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1992/1993). The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations. Trans. Kaneko, J.. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (1975). Recherches sociogénétiques sur la coordination d’actions interdépendantes. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 34: 160–174.Google Scholar
Doise, W., Mugny, G., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5: 367–383.Google Scholar
Doise, W., and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). (1986). L’étude des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestle.Google Scholar
van Dongen, J. (2017). The epistemic virtues of the virtuous theorist: On Albert Einstein and his autobiography. In van Dongen, J. and Paul, H. (Eds.). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Vol. 321. Cham: Springer, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
Dudás, L., and Szántó, R. (2021). Nudging in the time of coronavirus? Comparing public support for soft and hard preventive measures, highlighting the role of risk perception and experience. PLoS One, 16(8), e0256241: 1–15.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction Lukes, S.. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1897/1982). Marxism and sociology. The materialist conception of history (1897). In The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction Lukes, S.. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: The Free Press, pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1898/2010). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Revue de La Métaphysique et de Morale, 6: 273–302. In Durkheim, E. Sociology and Philosophy. Trans. Pocock, D. F.. Introduction Peristiany, J. G.. London: Routledge, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Duveen, G. (1993). The development of social representations of gender. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 171–177.Google Scholar
Duveen, G. (2001a). Genesis and structure: Piaget and Moscovici. In Buschini, F. and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). Penser la vie, le social, la nature : Mélange à l’honneur de Serge Moscovici. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 163–173.Google Scholar
Duveen, G. (2001b). Representations, identities, resistance. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 257–270.Google Scholar
Duveen, G. (2007). Culture and social representations. In Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 543–559.Google Scholar
Duveen, G. (2008). Social actors and social groups: A return to heterogeneity in social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 369–374.Google Scholar
Duveen, G., and de Rosa, A. S. (1992). Two approaches to the origins of development of social knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 1: 94–108.Google Scholar
Duveen, G., and Lloyd, B. (Eds.). (1990). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duveen, G., and Psaltis, C. (2008/2013). The constructive role of asymmetries in social interaction. In Mueller, U., Carpendale, J., Budwig, N., and Sokol, B.. (Eds.). Social Life and Social Knowledge: Toward a Process Account of Development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–204. Reprinted in Moscovici, S., Jovchelovitch, S., and Wagoner, B. (Eds.). (2013). Development as a Social Process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen. London: Routledge, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar
Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A., and Infeld, L. (1938/1961). The Evolution of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elejabarrieta, F. (1994). Social positioning: A way to link social identity and social representations. Social Science Information, 33: 241–253.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. (1992). Historiography, diagnosis, and poetics. Literature and Medicine, 11: 23–44.Google Scholar
Erdinast-Vulcan, D. (2010). Borderline subjectivity: The futurity of the present in Bakhtin’s work. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 8: 169–183.Google Scholar
Farmelo, G. (2009). The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. (1994). Attitude, social representations and social attitudes. Papers on Social Representations, 3(1): 30–33.Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. (1998). From collective to social representations: aller et retour. Culture & Psychology, 4: 275–296.Google Scholar
Faucheux, C. (1961). La représentation sociale de la psychanalyse. Les Temps Modernes, 188: 981–989.Google Scholar
Faucheux, C., and Moscovici, S. (1962). Remarques critiques sur la ‘question microsociale’ (Critical remarks on the ‘microsocial question’). Arguments, 6: 19–27.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W., and Shweder, R. A. (1986). Metatheory in Social Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12: 219–245.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. (1996). If p, then what? Thinking in cases. History of the Human Sciences, 9: 1–25.Google Scholar
Fraser, C. (1994). Attitudes, social representations and widespread beliefs. Papers on Social Representations, 3: 13–25.Google Scholar
French, S. (2020). There Are No Such Things as Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fruteau de Laclos, F. (2016). Les fruits philosophiques perdue de la psychologie française. In Bianco, G. and Fruteau de Laclos, F. (Eds.). L’angle mort des années 1950. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 193–213.Google Scholar
Fryer, D. (1986). The social psychology of the invisible: An interview with Marie Jahoda. New Ideas in Psychology, 4: 107–118.Google Scholar
Fryer, D., and Jahoda, M. (1998). The simultaneity of the unsimultaneous: A conversation between Marie Jahoda and David Fryer. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8: 89–100.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2001). Social representation of welfare and economic inequality. In Roland-Lévy, C. and Kirchler, E. (Eds.). Everyday Representations of Economy. Vienna: Wuv, pp. 113–136.Google Scholar
Garnier, C., and Rouquette, M.-L. (2000). (Eds.). Représentations sociales et éducation. Montréal: Ed. Nouvelles.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26: 309–320.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2011). The case study: What it is and what it does. In Goodin, E. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1133–1166.Google Scholar
Gervais, M.-C., and Jovchelovitch, S. (1998). Health and identity: The case of the Chinese community in England. Social Science Information, 37: 709–729.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 375–391.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2010). The intersubjective nature of symbols. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.). Symbolic Transformations: The Mind in Culture and Society. London: Routledge, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2020). Semantic contact and semantic barriers: Reactionary responses to disruptive ideas. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35: 21–25.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A., Howarth, C., and Cornish, F. (2012). Four problems for researchers using social categories. Culture & Psychology, 18: 391–402.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A., and Zittoun, T. (2016). The gift of a rock: A case study in the emergence and dissolution of meaning. In Bang, J. and Winther-Lindqvist, D. (Eds.). Nothingness. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gorky, M. (1935/1977). Soviet literature. In Scott, H. G. (Ed.). Soviet Writers Congress 1934. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 27–69.Google Scholar
Graumann, C. F. (1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Grize, J.-B. (1989). Logique naturelle et représentations sociales. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Guerrero, A. (2007). Imágenes de América Latina y México a través de los mapas mentales. Arruda, In A. and de Alba, M. (coords). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona, Spain: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 235–284.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.). Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, pp. 258–348.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1959). Introduction to facet design and analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology, Brussels – 1957. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 130–132.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1965). A faceted definition of intelligence. In Eifermann, R. R. (Ed.). Scripta Hierosolymitana. Studies in Psychology. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, pp. 166–181.Google Scholar
Häkli, T., and Hakoköngäs, E. (2022). Natural, enjoyable, and Finnish: Social representations of eating meat in Finnish meat product advertisements. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10: 306–322.Google Scholar
Hakoköngäs, E., and Sakki, I. (2016). The naturalized nation: Anchoring, objectification and naturalized social representations of history. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4: 646–669.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of ‘social representation’. Social Research, 51: 927–938.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1998). The epistemology of social representations. In Flick, W. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–137.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Culture & Psychology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar
Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2015). Positioning theory and social representations. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–233.Google Scholar
Harré, R., and Secord, P. F. (1972). The Explanation of Social Behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1977). The Phenomenology of the Spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/2001). Philosophy of Right. Trans. Dyde, S. W.. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1892–1896). History of Philosophy, in 3 vols. Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1935/1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 vols. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1927). Ding und Medium. Sonderdruke der Symposion, Weltkreis-Verlag, 7: 109–158.Google Scholar
Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69: 366–378.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. von (1792/2004). Letters concerning the progress of humanity (1792) (excerpts on European politics). In Johann Gottfried von Herder: Philosophical Writings. Trans. and Ed. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 361–369.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., and Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The Dialogical Self. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herzlich, C. (1969/1973). Santé et maladie. Analyse d’une représentation sociale. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études/Mouton (Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herzlich, C. (2018). A journey in the field of health: From social psychology to multi-disciplinarity. Journal of Health Psychology, 23: 286–396.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M., and Augoustinos, M. (1998). Social attributions and social representations. In Flick, U. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–76.Google Scholar
Hilton, D. J., and Liu, J. H. (2008). Culture and inter-group relations: The role of social representations of history. In Sorrentino, R. and Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.). The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Cultural Context. New York: Guilford, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar
van Holthoon, F. L., and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). (1987). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1973). The roots of complementarity. In Holton, G. (Ed.). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 115–161.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1974). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1975). On the role of themata in scientific thought. Science, 188: 328–334.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1978). The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I. (1952). A ‘communication analysis’ of concept learning. Psychological Review, 59: 461–472.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., and Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 14: 635–650.Google Scholar
Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 65–86.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An Introduction to Its Experimental Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ichheiser, G. (1968). Six meanings of the terms ‘rational’ and ‘irrational’. Sociologia Internationalis, 6: 96–100.Google Scholar
Isambert, F.-A. (1961). Moscovici Serge, La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Revue française de sociologie, 2–4: 328–330.Google Scholar
Israel, J., and Tajfel, H. (Eds.). (1972). The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. (1981/1982). The Possible and the Actual. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Published originally as Jacob, F. (1981). Le jeu des possibles. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1951). Race differences and race prejudice. Biology and Human Affairs, 16: 138–144.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1954). Political attitudes and judgments of other people. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 49: 330–334.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1964). Children’s concepts of nationality: A critical study of Piaget’s stages. Child Development, 3: 1081–1092.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on ‘social representations’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3): 195–209.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1999). Images of Savages: Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G., and Moscovici, S. (1967). European Association for Experimental Social Psychology. Social Science Information, 6: 297–305.Google Scholar
Jaspars, J. M. F., and Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S., and Delbridge, R. (2020). Organizational deception: Organizational contexts, social relations and types of lying. Organization Theory, 1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. (1997). Anchoring and Objectification. Lecture at the Summer School of Social Representations and Communication, August 1997. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. (2001). Ancrages. In Buschini, I. and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l’honneur de Serge Moscovici. Paris: Ed. de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 267–291.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. (2008). Linking science to common sense. Journal for the Theory of Social Representations, 38: 393–409.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. (2009). L’evolversi della teoria. In Palmonari, A. and Emiliani, F. (Eds.). Paradigmi delle Rappresentazioni Sociali. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 113–146.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. (2019). Regard sur une théorie en cours. Emiliani, In F. and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). Repenser la théorie de représentations sociales. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines. Coll. ‘Psychologie du social’, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (1984). Représentation sociale: phénomènes, concept et théorie. In Moscovici, S. (Ed.). Psychologie Sociale. Paris: P.U.F., pp. 357–378.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (1989). Représentations sociales: un domaine en expansion. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: P.U.F., pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (1989/1991). Madness and Social Representations. Trans. Pownall, T.. Ed. Duveen, G.. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (1992/2015). Mémoire de masse: le côté moral et affectif de l’histoire. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Représentations sociales et mondes de vie. Paris: Éditions des Archives contemporaines, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: The beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 411–430.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2011). Returning to past features of Serge Moscovici’s theory to feed the future. Papers on Social Representations, 20(2): 39.1–39.11.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2013). Encounters between forms of knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 22: 9.1–9.20.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2015). Représentations sociales et mondes de vie. Ed. Kalampalikis, N.. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2016). On structuring and outlining processes in the study of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 26(2): 2.1–2.11.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D., and Haas, V. (2019) Mémoires et représentations sociales. In Emiliani, F. and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). Repenser la théorie de Représentations Sociales. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines. Coll. ‘Psychologie du social’, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 217: 84–93.Google Scholar
Joffe, H. (2011). Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: Are changes afoot? Public Understanding of Science, 20: 446–460.Google Scholar
Joffe, H., and Haarhoff, G. (2002). Representations of far-flung illnesses: The case of Ebola in Britain. Social Science & Medicine, 54: 955–696.Google Scholar
Joffe, H., Rossetto, T., Solberg, C., and O’Connor, C. (2013). Social representations of earthquakes: A study of people living in three highly seismic areas. Earthquake Spectra, 29: 367–397.Google Scholar
Joffe, H., Washer, P., and Solberg, C. (2011). Public engagement with emerging infectious disease: The case of MRSA in Britain. Psychology & Health, 26: 667–683.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S., and Gervais, M.-C. (1999). Social representations of health and illness: The case of Chinese community in England. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9: 247–260.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S., and Priego-Hernández, J. (2013). Underground Sociabilities: Identity, Culture and Resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas. Brasilia: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S., and Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public space. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–178.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Collected Works. Volume 9, Part 1. Trans. Hull, R. F. C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kaiser, D. I. (2013). Epilogue: Textbooks and the emergence of a conceptual trajectory. In Badino, M., and Navarro, J. (Eds.). Research and Pedagogy: A History of Quantum Physics through Its Textbooks. Berlin: Edition Open Access, pp. 281–285.Google Scholar
Kalampalikis, N. (2007). Les Grecs et le mythe d’Alexandre (The Greeks and the myth of Alexander). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kalampalikis, N., and Moscovici, S. (2005). Une approche pragmatique de l’analyse Alceste. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 66: 15–24.Google Scholar
Kallemeyn, L. M., Hall, J. N., and Gates, E. (2020). Exploring the relevance of complexity theory for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14: 288–304.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781/1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, N. K.. London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1788/1873). Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Abbott, T. K.. London: Longsman, Green.Google Scholar
Karcevskij, S. (1929/1982). Du dualisme asymetrique du sign linguistique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 1: 33–38. Reprinted as The asymmetric dualism of the linguistic sign. In Steiner, F. (Ed.). The Prague School: Selected Writings, 1919–1946. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. (1992). Common sense psychology and scientific psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43: 1–23.Google Scholar
Kepler, J. (1619/2014). Harmonies of the World. Trans. Wallis, C. G., 1939. New York: Global Grey.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. (1936). Review of C. Bougie: Bilan de la sociologie française contemporaine. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 5: 260–264.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. (1948). ‘Du monde de l’ « à-peu-près » à l’univers de la précision’ (From the world of ‘very nearly’ to the universe of precision). Critique, 28: 806–823.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. (2018). Hegel at Jena. Translation and introduction by D. Tazi: Alexandre Koyré ´s ‘Hegel at Jena’. Contemporary Philosophical Review, 51: 361–400.Google Scholar
Kragh, H. (2013). Paul Dirac and the principles of quantum mechanics. In Badino, M. and Navarro, J. (Eds.). Research and Pedagogy: A History of Quantum Physics through Its Textbooks. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Edition Open Access, pp. 245–260.Google Scholar
Krause, M. (2019). What is Zeitgeist? Examining period-specific cultural patterns. Poetics, 76: October, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.02.003.Google Scholar
Kronberger, N. (2015). Of worlds and objects: Scientific knowledge and its publics. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 358–368.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (2001). Social cognition, social representations, and the dilemmas of social theory construction. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representing the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 242–248.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1984). Revisiting Planck. Historical Studies in Physical Sciences, 14: 231–252.Google Scholar
Lagache, D. (1949). L’Unité de la Psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lahlou, S. (1998). Penser manger. Les représentations sociales de l’alimentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
László, J. (1997). Narrative organization of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 6(2): 155–172.Google Scholar
László, J. (2008). The Science of Stories. An Introduction to Narrative Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lecourt, D. (1977). Proletarian Science? The Case of Lysenko. Introduction Althusser, L.. Trans. Brewster, B.. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Leman, P. J., and Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children’s understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 683–702.Google Scholar
Leman, P. J., and Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children’s moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 557–575.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1902/1961). What is to be done. In Lenin’s Collected Works, Vol. 5. Trans. Fineberg, J. and Hanna, G.. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 347–530.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1913/1977). Three sources and three component parts of Marxism. In Lenin’s Collected Works, Vol. 19. Trans. Hanna, G.. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 21–28.Google Scholar
Le Roux, R. (2009). Lévi-Strauss, une réception paradoxale de la cybernétique. L’Homme, 189: 165–190.Google Scholar
Lévinas, E. (1951/1996). Is ontology fundamental? In Peperzak, A. T., Critchley, S., and Bernasconi, R. (Eds.). Emmanuel Lévinas: Basic Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Lévinas, E. (1998). Philosophy, justice and love. In Lévinas, E. (Ed.). Entre-nous: On Thinking of the Other. Trans. Smith, M. B. and Harshav, B.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levine, D. N. (2018). Dialogical Social Theory. Ed. Schneiderman, H. G.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1954). Introduction: The mathematics of man. UNESCO International Social Science Bulletin, VI. 581–590.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1939/1952). Field theory and experiment in social psychology. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.). Field Theory in Social Science. London: Tavistock, pp. 130–154.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the ‘field at a given time’. Psychological Review, 50: 292–310.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1981). Cassirers Wissenschaftsphilosophie und die Sozialwissenschaften. In Kurt-Lewin-Werkausgabe, (hrsg) Carl-Fridrich Graumann. Wissenschafttheorie I, (hrsg) Alexandre Métraux. Bern: Hans Huber, pp. 347–365.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (1987). Common sense and social structure: A sociological view. In van Holthoon, F. and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Litton, I., and Potter, J. (1985). Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15: 371–388.Google Scholar
Liu, J. H., and Sibley, C. G. (2015). Representations of world history. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 269–279.Google Scholar
Lloyd, B., and Duveen, G. (1990). A semiotic analysis of the development of social representations of gender. In Lloyd, B. and Duveen, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, B., and Duveen, G. (1992). Gender Identities and Education. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lofts, S. G., and Calgagno, A. (2013). Translators’ introduction. In Ernst Cassirer: The Warburg Years (1919–1933). Trans. and with an Introduction by Lofts, S. G. with Calcagno, A.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. ix–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., Delouvée, S., and Rateau, P. (2016). Représentations sociales: théories, méthodes, applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Superieur.Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M. (1977). The dynamic model of a semiotic system. Semiotica, 21(3/4): 193–210. Un modèle dynamique du système sémiotique. In Lotman, Y. M. and Ouspenski, B. A. (Eds.). Travaux sur les systèmes de signes. Trans. Zouboff, A.. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M. (1992). Vmesto zaklucenija o roli slucajnych faktorov v istorii kultury. In Lotman, Y. M. (Ed.). Izbrannyje stati v trech tomax. Tom I, pp. 472–479.Google Scholar
Luckmann, T. (1987). Some thoughts on common sense and science. In van Holthoon, F. and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America, pp. 179–197.Google Scholar
Malrieu, P. (1977). Langage et représentation, La genèse de la parole, Symposium de l’Association de Psychologie scientifique de langue française. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Malrieu, P., and Malrieu, S. (1973). La socialisation. In Gratiot-Alphandéry, H. and Zazzo, R. (Eds.). Traité de psychologie de l’enfant, Vol. 5. Paris: PUF, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1953). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Ed. Kecskemeti, P.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6: 419–460.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2007). Haemophilia. In Baum, A., McManus, C., Newman, S., Weinman, J., and West, R. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 718–720.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2012a). Objectification in common sense thinking. Mind, Culture and Activity, 19: 207–221.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2012b). Confession as a communication genre: The logos and mythos of the Party. In Marková, I. and Gillespie, A. (Eds.). Trust and Conflict: Culture, Representation and Dialogue. London: Routledge, pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2013). Forms of resistance during Stalinism. In Bauer, M. W., Harré, R., and Jensen, C. (Eds.). Resistance and the Practice of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2016). The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2017). Themata in science and in common sense. Kairos. Journal of Philosophy and Science, 19: 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marková, I. (2018). From imagination to well-controlled images. In Zittoun, T. and Glaveanu, V. (Eds.). Handbook of Imagination and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 319–344.Google Scholar
Marková, I., and Jahoda, A. (2018). Editorial: Across history, mind, and culture. Culture & Psychology, 24: 265–281.Google Scholar
Marková, I., and Jahoda, A. (2019). Gustav Jahoda. In Bibliographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XVIII. London: British Academy, pp. 155–174.Google Scholar
Marková, I., McKee, K., Power, K., and Moodie, E. (1995). The self, the other and perceived risk: Lay representations of HIV/AIDS in Scottish prisons. In Marková, I. and Farr, R. M. (Eds.). Representations of Health, Illness and Handicap. New York: Harwood, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Marková, I., Moodie, I., Farr, R., Drozda-Senkowska, E., Erös, F., Plichtová, J., Gervais, M-C., Hoffmannová, J., and Mullerová, O. (1998). Social representations of the individual: A post-communist perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28: 797–829.Google Scholar
Marková, I., Wilkie, P. A., Naji, S., and Forbes, C. (1990). Self- and other-awareness of the risk of HIV/AIDS in people with haemophilia and implications for behavioural change. Social Science and Medicine, 31: 73–79.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844/1970). Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Trans. Milligan, M.. Moscow and London: Progress Publishers and Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867/1887). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I. Trans. Moore, S. and Aveling, E.. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Massoud, L. A., and Kuipers, J. C. (2008). Objectification and the inscription of knowledge in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 19: 211–224.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26: 446–456.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1936). Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of Perception. Translation of French Original (1945) by C. Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Méthode en psychologie de l’enfant. Bulletin de Psychologie, 18: 109–140.Google Scholar
Milgram, S., and Jodelet, D. (1976). Psychological map of Paris. In Proshansky, H., Ittelson, W. H., and Rivlin, L. G. (Eds.). Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings (second ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp. 104–124.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. (1975). Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: A Gestalt psychologist’s view of the genesis of special relativity theory. History of Science, 13: 75–103.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time and the Beauty that Causes Havoc. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1995). A two-dimensional model of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 27–40.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (2020). On Serge Moscovici’s 95th anniversary: The theory of social representations – History, postulates, and dissemination. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17: 542–553.Google Scholar
Moliner, P., and Abric, J.-C. (2015). Central core theory. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–85.Google Scholar
Moloney, G., Gamble, M., Hayman, K., and Smith, G. (2015). Without anchor: Themata and blood donation. Papers on Social Representations, 24(2): 2.1–2.21.Google Scholar
Moloney, G., Hall, R., and Walker, I. (2005). Social representations and themata: The construction and functioning of social knowledge about donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44: 415–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moloney, G., and Walker, I. (Eds.). (2007). Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, G., Walker, I., and Charlton, T. (2013). Social understandings of organ donation: Implications for practice. In Lauri, M. A. (Ed.). Organ Donation and Transplantation: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 141–150.Google Scholar
Moloney, G., Williams, J., and Blair, D. (2012). Cognitive polyphasia, themata and blood donation: Between or within representation. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 4.1–4.12.Google Scholar
Moodie, E., Marková, I., and Plichtová, J. (1995). Lay representations of democracy: A study in two cultures. Culture & Psychology, 1: 423–454.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2012). Case studies: One observation or many? Justification or discovery? Philosophy of Science, 79: 667–677.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2014). Re-situating knowledge: Generic strategies and case studies. Philosophy of Science, 80: 1012–1024.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S., and Wise, M. N. (2017). Narrative science and narrative knowing: Introduction to special issue on narrative science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, 62: 1–5.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1977/1982). Le systéme, paradigme ou théorie? The inaugural address to the Congres de l’A.F.C.E.T, Versailles, November 21, 1977. In Morin, E. (Ed.). Science avec conscience. Trans. Kelly, S.. Paris: Fayard, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 15: 371–385.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1997). Comprendre la complexité dans les organisations de soins. Paris: ASPEPS.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1999). Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future. Trans. from French Poller, N.. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (2008). Restricted complexity, general complexity. arXiv:cs/0610049v1[csCC], 10 October 2006.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1952). Premiers résultats d’une enquête concernant la psychanalyse. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 3: 386–415.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1953). Remarques sur les problèmes structuraux dans l’étude des opinions. Bulletin de Psychologie, VI, 190: 420–428.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1954). L’analyse hiérarchique. Sur une contribution importante à la construction des échelles. Année Psychologique, 54: 83–110.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1958). Reconversion industrielle. Problèmes de formation et durée. Bulletin de l’Agence Européenne de Productivité, 30: 47–59.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1959). La résistance à la mobilité géographique dans les expériences de reconversion. Sociologie du travail, 1: 24–25.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1960). Sur l’incertitude des rapports entre expérience et théorie au 17e siècle: La loi de Baliani. Physis, 2: 14–43.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961a). La psychanalyse: son image et son public (Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961/1976). La psychanalyse: son image et son public (Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961b). Reconversion industrielle et changement sociaux. Un exemple: la chapellerie dans l’Aude. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14: 231–260.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1966). L’histoire des sciences et la science des historiens. Archives Européennes Sociologiques, VII: 116–126.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1965). Les développements historiques de la théorie galiléenne des marées. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et de leurs Applications, 18: 129–240. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1965.241.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1967). L’expérience du mouvement. Jean-Baptiste Baliani, disciple et critique de Galilée. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1968/1977). Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature (Essay on the human history of nature). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1969). Le marxisme et la question naturelle. L’Homme et la société, 13: 59–109.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1969/1973). Foreword. In Herzlich, C. (Ed.). Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press, pp. ix–xiv.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1970). Préface. In Jodelet, D., Viet, J., and Besnard, P. (Eds.). La psychologie sociale, une discipline en mouvement (Social psychology, a discipline in movement). Paris-La Haye: Mouton, pp. 9–64.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1972a). Society and theory in social psychology. In Israel, J. and Tajfel, H. (Eds.). The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 17–68.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1972/1976). La société contre nature. Paris: Union Générale d’éditions (édition revue et corrigée par l’auteur, postface inédite, Paris, Seuil, 1994). English trans. Rabinovitch, S.. Society against Nature: The Emergence of Human Societies. London: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1974/1979). Hommes domestiques et hommes sauvages. Paris: Union Générale d’éditions (nouvelle édition, C. Bourgois, 1979).Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1974/2012). Nos sociétés biuniques. Revue Communications, 22: 135–150. Reprinted by Le Seuil. Revue Communications, 91: 93–112.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. Trans. Sherrard, C. and Heinz, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976/2008). La psychanalyse: son image et son public, second ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. Macey, D. as Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1979a). Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1979b). ‘La dissidence d’un seul’ (The dissent of one). In Psychologie des minorités actives (Psychology of active minorities). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 241–266.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. (Ed.). Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. New York: Academic Press, pp. 181–210.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1981/1985). The Age of the Crowd. Trans. Whitehouse, J. C.. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1982). The coming era of representations. In Codol, J.-P. and Leyens, J.-P. (Eds.). Cognitive Approaches to Social Behavior. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, pp. 115–150.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984a). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–69.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984b). The myth of a lonely paradigm: A rejoinder. Social Research, 51: 939–967.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984c). Introduction: Le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In Moscovici, S. (Ed.). Psychologie sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 5–22.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1985). Comment on Potter and Litton. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24: 91–92.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1986). The discovery of the masses. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1987). The conspiracy mentality. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. New York: Springer, pp. 151–169.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 211–250.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1988/1993). La machine à faire des dieux: sociologie et psychologie. Paris: Fayard. Trans. Hall, W. D. as The Invention of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1989). Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales: éléments pour une histoire. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 62–86.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1990a). Social representations and developmental psychology: Extending the conversation. In Duveen, G. and Lloyd, B. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–185.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1990b). The origin of social representations: A response to Michael. New Ideas in Psychology, 8: 383–388.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1992). The psychology of scientific myths. In von Cranach, M., Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Social Bases of Knowledge. Lewiston, Toronto, and Bern: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1993b). Introductory address. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 160–170.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33(2): 163–177.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1995). Modernité, sociétés vécues et sociétés conçues. Penser le sujet. Autour d’Alain Touraine. Colloque de Cerisy. Paris: Fayard, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1996). Just remembering. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 5–14.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1997a). Chronique des années égarées: récit autobiographique. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1997c). Singer, Sakharov et avoir air. L’inactuel, 7, printempt. Eds. Lacoste, P., Moscovici, M., and Fédida, P.. Paris: Calmann-Levy, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1998). Social consciousness and its history. Culture & Psychology, 4: 410–429.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1998/2000). The history and actuality of social representations. In Flick, U. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 209–247. Reprinted in Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Ed. Duveen, G.. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 120–155.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2000). What is in the name? In Chaib, M. and Orfali, B. (Eds.). Social Representations and Communicative Processes. Jönköping: Jönköping University Press, pp. 12–27.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2001). Age des masses, âge des minorités. In Segatori, R., Cristofori, C., and Santambrogio, A. (Eds.). Sociologia ed esperienza di vita: Scritti in onore di Franco Crespi. Milan: Il Mulino, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2002b). Review of Durkheim and Representations. Ed. Pickering, W. S. F.. Contemporary Sociology, 31: 799–800.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2003) Le premier article (The first article). Journal des Psychologues, Numéro hors série: 10–13.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2005). Le regard psychosocial. Entretien avec Birgitta Orfali. Hermès, La Revue, 41: 17–24.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2010). Let us not forget to think, nor the thinkers! Papers on Social Representations, 19: 2.1–2.4.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2011). Essay on social representations and ethnic minorities. Social Science Information, 50: 442–461.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2019). Mon après-guerre à Paris: chronique des années retrouvée. Texte établi, présenté et annoté par Alexandra Laignel-Lavastine. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2020). Reflections on the popularity of ‘conspiracy mentalities’. International Review of Social Psychology, 33: 1–13.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., Ackerman, W., Barbichon, G., Buffard, D., Rialan, B., and Vidal, D. (1962). Diffusion des connaissances scientifiques et techniques. Etudes sur l’assimilation des connaissances et sur la formation des adultes. Rapport au Commissariat General au Plan et à la Productivité. Centre d’Etudes et Recherches Psychotechniques.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Columelli, F. (1957). Contribution à l’étude des aspirations économiques des travailleurs. Bulletin du CERP, 6: 405–422.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Dibie, P. (2002). Retour à la nature. Entretiens. Gémenos: Editions de l’Aube.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Doise, W. (1992/1994). Dissensions et consensus. Une théorie générale des décisions collectives. Paris: PUF. Trans. Halls, W. D. as Conflict and Consensus: A General Theory of Collective Decisions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the ‘naïve’ to the ‘amateur’ scientist. In Hewstone, M. (Ed.). Attribution Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 98–125.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., Jovchelovitch, S., and Wagoner, B. (Eds.). (2013). Development as a Social Process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (1998). Presenting social representation: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4: 371–410.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (2000). Ideas and their development: A dialogue between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Marková. In Moscovici, S.. Social Representations. Ed. Duveen, G.. London: Polity Press, pp. 224–286.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (2006). The Making of Modern Social Psychology: The Hidden Story of How an International Social Science Was Created. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Pérez, J. A. (2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37: 725–746.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Toublanc, P. (1957). Structure et problèmes démographiques de la Haute-Valée de l’Aude. Revue de l’Economie Méridionale, 5: 161–170.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Vidal, D. (1961). Difficultés et enseignement de la reconversion. Travail Social, 1–4: 53–55.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., and Vignaux, G. (1994/2000). Le concept de thêmata. In Guimelli, C.. Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé, pp. 25–72. Reprinted in Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations. Ed. and trsl. Duveen, G.. London: Polity Press, pp. 156–183.Google Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mouro, C., and Castro, P. (2012). Cognitive polyphasia in the reception of legal innovations for biodiversity conservation. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 3.1–3.21.Google Scholar
Neculau, A. (Ed.). (2008). La vie quotidienne en Roumanie sous communisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Némedi, D. (1995). Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations: Durkheim’s sociology of knowledge, 1894–1900. Sociological Perspectives, 38: 41–56.Google Scholar
Némedi, D. (2000). A change in ideas: Collective consciousness, morphology and collective representations. In Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). Durkheim and Representations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Nicholson, C. (2016). How Intractable Is Intractable? A Social Psychological Study of the Permeability of Imaginary Boundaries across Groups in Conflict. PhD thesis. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Nicholson, C., and Howarth, C. (2018). Imagining collective identities beyond intergroup conflict. In de Saint-Laurent, C., Obradović, S., and Carriere, K. R. (Eds.). Imagining Collective Futures. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–196.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. (1950). The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect of the ‘New Science’ upon Seventeenth Century Poetry. Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
Paoletti, G. (2004/2005). Durkheim and the problem of objectivity: A reading of Les forms élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Revue française de sociologie, 45: 3–25.Google Scholar
Panagiotou, E., and Kadianaki, I. (2019). From cognitive dissonance to cognitive polyphasia: A sociocultural approach to understanding meat‐paradox. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49: 235–253.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1956). Galileo as a critic of the arts: Aesthetic attitude and scientific thought. Isis, 47: 3–15.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Trans. Wood, C. S.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Paredes, E. C., and Jodelet, D. (2009). Pensamento mitico e representações sociais. Cuiabá: EdUFMT.Google Scholar
Parker, I. (1987). Social representations: Social psychology’s (mis)use of sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17: 447–470.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. (1955). La pénétration de la psychanalyse en France et aux États-Unis. Une étude de la psychologie sociale comparative. La thèse doctorale. Paris: Université de Paris. Faculté des Lettres.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. (1964/2010). Is Oedipus complex universal? In LeVine, R. A. (Ed.). Psychological Anthropology: A Reader in Self in Culture. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 131–153.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. (1969). Belief, Magic and Anomie: Essays in Psychological Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Paskins, M., and Morgan, M. S. (2019). An anthology of narrative science. www.narrative-science.org/uploads/3/1/7/6/31762379/narrative_science_anthology_complete_final_draft_9_11_2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6. Eds. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8. Ed. Burks, A. W., 1958. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development in Children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1994). Articuler l’individuel et le collectif. New Review of Social Psychology, 3: 94–102.Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Perret, J. A., and Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Pétard, J.-P. (2009). Hommage aux pionniers. En feuilletant les premiers tomes du Bulletin de Psychologie. Bulletin de Psychologie, 62: 109–118.Google Scholar
Phoenix, A., Howarth, C., and Philogène, G. (2017). The everyday politics of identities and social representations: A critical approach. Papers on Social Representations, 26(1): 2.1–2.21.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1926/1997). The Child’s Conception of the World. Trans. Tomlinson, J. and Tomlinson, A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). (2000a). Durkheim and Representations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pickering, W. S. F. (2000b). What do representations represent? In Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). Durkheim and Representations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 98–117.Google Scholar
Pizzorni, F. (1995). Cent ans de collectes en Corse. Cahiers d’anthropologique, 4: 164.Google Scholar
Pomata, G. (2014). The medical case narrative: A distant reading of an epistemic genre. Literature and Medicine, 32: 1–23.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1957). Philosophy of science: A personal report. In Mace, C. A. (Ed.). British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 155–191.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (2019). Action and representation – A comment on Batel and Castro re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58: 410–414.Google Scholar
Potter, J., and Billig, M. (1992). Re-representing representations: Discussion of Räty and Snellman. Papers on Social Representations, 1(1): 15–20.Google Scholar
Potter, J., and Hepburn, A. (2008) Discursive constructionism. In Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York: Guildford, pp. 275–293.Google Scholar
Potter, J., and Litton, I. (1985). Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24: 81–90.Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Priego-Hernández, J. (2011). Sexual and Reproductive Health among Indigenous Mexican Adolescents: A Socio-representational Perspective, PhD Thesis. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. N., and Schiebinger, L. (2008). (Eds.). Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Provencher, C. (2011). Towards a better understanding of cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41: 377–395.Google Scholar
Provencher, C., Arthi, , and Wagner, W. (2012). Cognitive polyphasia: Introductory article. In Provencher, C., Arthi, , and Wagner, W. (Eds.). Cognitive Polyphasia: A Special Issue. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 1.1–1.15.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C. (2010). Commentary: On the inertia of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 19: 15.1–15.8.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C., and Duveen, G. (2006). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation type and representations of gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 407–430.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C., and Duveen, G. (2007). Conversation types and conservation: Forms of recognition and cognitive development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25: 79–102.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C., Duveen, G., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). The social and the psychological: Structure and context in intellectual development. Human Development, 52: 291–312.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). Social Relations in Human and Societal Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Purkhardt, S. C. (1993). Transforming Social Representation: A Social Psychology of Common Sense and Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C., and Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramage, M., and Shipp, K. (2009). System Thinkers. London: Open University and Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Rateau, P., and Lo Monaco, G. (2016). La theorie structurale ou ‘horlogerie des nuages. In Lo Monaco, G., Delouvée, S., and Rateau, P. (Eds.). Représentations sociales: théories, méthodes, applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Superieur, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Räty, H., and Snellman, L. (1992). Making the unfamiliar familiar: Some notes on the criticism of the theory of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 1: 3–13.Google Scholar
Raudsepp, M. (2005). Why is it so difficult to understand the theory of social representations? Culture & Psychology, 11: 455–468.Google Scholar
Raudsepp, M., Heidmets, M., and Kruusvall, J. (2008). Changing patterns of trust: The Estonian case. In Marková, I. and Gillespie, A. (Eds.). Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural Perspectives. Charlotte: Information Age Publishers, pp. 247–264.Google Scholar
Renwick, D. (2019). We walk in silence (video file). www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzGnrTJBkn8&feature=youtu.be.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1967). New developments in phenomenology in France: The phenomenology of language. Social Research, 34: 1–30.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1990/1992). Oneself as Another. Trans. Blamey, K.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ritzer, G., and Goodman, D. (2000). Introduction: Towards a more open canon. In Ritzer, G. (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (1987). The social representations of mental illness in children and adults. In Doise, W. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Current Issues in European Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–138.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (1993). Social representations and attitudes: Problems of coherence between the theoretical definition and procedure of research. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 178–192.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (1994). From theory to metatheory in social representations: The lines of argument of a theoretical-methodological debate. Social Science Information, 33: 273–304.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (2006). The ‘boomerang’ effect of radicalism in discursive psychology: A critical overview of the controversy with the social representations theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36: 161–201.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (Ed.) (2013a). Social Representations in the ‘Social Arena’. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (2013b). Research fields in social representations: Snapshot views from a meta-theoretical analysis. In de Rosa, A. S. (Ed.). Social Representations in the ‘Social Arena’. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 89–124.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (2016). Mise en reseau scientifique et cartographie de la dissémination de la théorie des représentations sociales et son impact à l’ère de la culture bibliographique. In Lo Monaco, G., Delouvée, S., and Rateau, P. (Eds.). Représentations sociales: théories, méthodes, applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Superieur, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S., Dryjanska, L., and Bocci, E. (2019). Mapping the dissemination of the theory of social representations via academic social networks. In Mendi Khosrow-Pour, D. B. A. (Ed.). Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Media and Communications. Hershey: IGI, Information Science Reference, pp. 426–440.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S., Fino, E., and Bocci, E. (2019). From the psychoanalyst’s couch to social networks. In Mendi Khosrow-Pour, D. B. A. (Ed.). Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Media and Communications, pp. 391–404.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, F. (2001). Foi et savoir. Introduit, traduit et annoté par G. Bensussan, M Crépon et M. de Launay. Paris: Librarie philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
The Royal Society of London (1985). The report of a Royal Society ad hoc group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society on the public understanding of science. http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, J. (1996). Tangled Loyalties: The Life and Times of Ilya Ehrenburg. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rubira-García, R., Puebla-Martínez, B., and Gelado-Marcos, R. (2018). Social representations in studying information, knowledge, and mediations: A critical review. Social Sciences, 7: 256.Google Scholar
Ruggieri, R., and Rochira, A. (2013). Semiotics and social representation: A figure-and-ground relationship of mutual cultivation. Papers on Social Representations, 22(2): 15.1–15.9.Google Scholar
Sá, C. P. (2016). A Brazilian way of looking at the Aix School. Papers on Social Representations, 25(2): 8.1–8.11.Google Scholar
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2018). Thinking through time: From collective memories to collective futures. In de Saint-Laurent, C., Obradović, S., and Carriere, K. R. (Eds.). Imagining Collective Futures. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
Sakharov, A. (1975/1997). Nobel lecture: Peace, progress, human rights. In Frängsmyr, T. (Ed.). In Nobel Lectures Peace 1971–80. Singapore, New Jersey, London, and Hong Kong: World Scientific, pp. 105–133.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., and Veltri, G. (Eds.). (2021). Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. (2015). Attitudes, social representations and points of view. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–112.Google Scholar
Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., and Grossen, M. (1993). Negotiating the meaning of questions in didactic and experimental contracts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8: 451–471.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1972). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Trans. Walsh, G. and Lehnert, F.. London: Heineman Educational Books.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simão, L. M., Guimarães, D. S., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Temporality: Culture in the Flow of Human Experience. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (2009). Piaget’s developmental epistemology. In Müller, U., Carpendale, I. M., and Smith, L. (Eds.). Cambridge Companion to Piaget. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–93.Google Scholar
Smith, N., and Joffe, H. (2013). How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22: 16–32.Google Scholar
Smith, N., O’Connor, C., and Joffe, H. (2015). Social representations of threatening phenomena: The self–other thema and identity protection. Papers on Social Representations, 24(2): 1.1–1.23.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1990). The epidemiology of beliefs. In Fraser, C. and Gaskell, G. (Eds.). The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Stalin, J. V. (1921–1923/1953). The Political Strategy and Tactics of the Russian Communists, Works, 5. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 63–89.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, S. (2000). Representation in Durkheim’s masters: Kant and Renouvier. In Pickering, W. S. F.. (Ed.). Durkheim and Representations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 37–79.Google Scholar
Steigmann-Gall, R. (2004). Was national socialism a political religion or a religious politics? In Geyer, M. and Lehmann, H. (Eds.). Religion and Nation. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, pp. 386–408.Google Scholar
Stenner, P. (2014). Transdisciplinarity. In Teo, T. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer, pp. 1987–1993.Google Scholar
Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and Experience: A Transdisciplinarity Approach to the Psychosocial. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stepun, F. (1958). The Russian intelligentsia and bolshevism. The Soviet Review, 17: 263–277.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., Lumsdaine, A. A., Lumsdaine, M. H., Williams, R. M., Smith, M. B., Janis, I. L., Star, S. A., and Cottrell, I. S. (Eds.). (1949). The American Soldier Combat and Its Aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 1: 173–191.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). (Ed.). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarde, G. (1903). The Laws of Imitation. Trans. Parsons, E. C.. Introduction Giddings, F. H.. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Tarkovsky, A. (1987). Sculpting in Time. Trans. Hunter-Blair, K.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Tarkovsky, A. (1994). Time within Time: The Diaries 1970–1986. Trans. Hunter-Blair, K.. London and Boston: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1964). The Explanation of Social Behavior. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2003). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sustein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I., and Znaniecki, F. (1918–1920). Polish Peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an Immigrant Group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tileagă, C. (2018). Troubled pasts, collective memory, collective futures. In de Saint-Laurent, C., Obradović, S., and Carriere, K. R. (Eds.). Imagining Collective Futures. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. C. (1990). Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above, 1928–1941. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tumarkin, N. (1983). Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Twenge, J., and Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation. Human Development, 44: 84–97.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2003). Beyond social representations: A theory of enablement. Papers on Social Representations, 12: 7.1–7.16.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2018). Beyond Methods to Open-Systemic Methodology in Contemporary Cultural Psychologies. The Sixth Niels Bohr Lectures on Cultural Psychology. Lecture II, 27 February 2018.Google Scholar
Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Varieties of moral orders and the dual structure of society: A perspective from positioning theory. Frontiers in Sociology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2017,00009.Google Scholar
Van Langenhove, L., and Wise, D. (2019). Introduction: The relation between the social representation theory and positioning theory. Papers on Social Representations, 28: 1.1–1.9.Google Scholar
Veltri, G. (2013). Social signification and social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 22(2): 17.1–17.5.Google Scholar
Veltri, G. (2015). Social semiotics and social representations. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–249.Google Scholar
Vico, G. (1744/1948). The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Trans. Bergin, T. G. and Fisch, M. H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Voelklein, C., and Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: A British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11: 431–454.Google Scholar
Vucinich, A. (2001). Einstein and Soviet Ideology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Eds. and Trans. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., and Souberman, E.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (1996a). Queries about social representations and construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26: 95–120.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (1996b). The social representation paradigm. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35: 247–255.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond – Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4: 297–329.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Themel, M., and Verma, J. (1999). The modernisation of tradition: Thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5: 413–445.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., and Themel, M. (2000). ‘I have some faith and at the same time I don’t believe’ – Cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 10: 301–314.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., and Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday Discourse and Common Sense: The Theory of Social Representations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., and Seifert, F. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledges, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41: 323–343.Google Scholar
Wagoner, B. (2008). Making the familiar unfamiliar. Culture & Psychology, 14: 467–474.Google Scholar
Wagoner, B. (2012). Notes on a social psychology of thinking: A comparison of Bartlett and Moscovici. Papers on Social Representations, 21(6): 1–6.14.Google Scholar
Wallon, H. (1945). Les origines de la pensée chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. (2022). An Exploration into Social Representations of ‘Mental Illness’. PhD thesis. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
Walsh, D., and Foster, J. (2022). Where does research design fall short? Mental health related-stigma as example. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(3): 494–514.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zadeh, S., and Cabra, M. (2020). Dialogical exemplars as communicative tools: Resituating knowledge from dialogical case studies. Culture & Psychology, 26: 25–39.Google Scholar
Zadeh, S., Marková, I., and Zittoun, T. (2020). Special issue on dialogical single case studies. Culture & Psychology, 26.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1995). Alexandre Koyré versus Lucien Lévy-Bruhl: From collective representations to paradigms of scientific thought. Science in Context 8: 531–555.Google Scholar
Zhdanov, A. A. (1935/1977). Soviet literature – The richest in ideas, the most advanced literature. In Scott, H. G. (Ed.). Soviet Writers Congress 1934. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., and Gillespie, A. (2016). Imagination in Human and Cultural Development. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., and Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development. Human Development, 50: 208–229.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M. M., and Ferring, D. (2013). Human Development in the Life Course: Melodies of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zukier, H. (1987). The conspiratorial imperative: Medieval Jewry in Western Europe. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. New York: Springer, pp. 86–103.Google Scholar