We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Given some data our problem is to discover the best point estimate of a magnitude. For this purpose a good estimate will be what I have called a well-supported one: an estimate which the data give good reason to suppose is close to the true value. We assume that a scale of closeness is implied in the statement of the problem. We shall be concerned with the excellence of individual estimates, and of estimators making estimates for particular problems, rather than with comparing the average properties of estimators. We seek estimators which give well-supported estimates.
Only rather limited and feeble solutions are offered here. Perhaps there is no general answer to fundamental questions about estimation. Maybe estimation, as I have understood it in the preceding chapter, is only barely relevant to statistical inference. One ought, perhaps, to search for other, related, notions which are more fruitful. But first we must try to do our best with well-supported estimates of statistical parameters.
An historical note
A little history will hint at the flavour of chaos in estimation theory. Unfortunately few students have distinguished the property of being a well-supported estimate, from the property of being an estimate made by an estimator which is in some way close on the average. So the traditional estimators I am about to describe were seldom aimed at one or the other of these two properties, but if anything, at both at once.
Estimation in statistics is relatively recent; it followed two centuries of estimation in other fields. Most work did, however, make use of the doctrine of chances. The usual problem concerned measurement. Some quantity, such as the distance of a star or the melting point of a chemical, is measured several times; there are small discrepancies; now use the measurements to estimate the true value of the physical quantity. Another problem is curve fitting; try to fit a smooth curve to a number of different points all based on observations. This is both a problem of guessing the true curve, and of estimating the characteristics of that curve.
There were forerunners, but Laplace and Gauss are the great pioneers of what came to be called the theory of errors. Despite their many theoretical insights, the whole science remained pretty ad hoc until the 1920's. Many issues had to be settled which now are taken for granted.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
