Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:55:12.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autonomous Fixed Point Progressions and Fixed Point Transfinite Recursion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Thomas Strahm
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Samuel R. Buss
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Petr Hájek
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Pavel Pudlák
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Logic Colloquium '98 , pp. 449 - 464
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. J., Avigad. On the relationship between ATR0 and ID. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 61(3):768–779, 1996.Google Scholar
2. J., Barwise. Admissible Sets and Structures: An Approach to Definability Theory. Springer, Berlin, 1975.
3. S., Feferman. A language and axioms for explicit mathematics. In J., Crossley, editor, Algebra and Logic, volume 450 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 87–139. Springer, Berlin, 1975.
4. S., Feferman. Constructive theories of functions and classes. In M., Boffa, D., van Dalen, and K., McAloon, editors, Logic Colloquium '78, pages 159–224. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.
5. S., Feferman. Iterated inductive fixed-point theories: application to Hancock's conjecture. In G., Metakides, editor, The Patras Symposion, pages 171–196. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
6. H., Friedman, K., McAloon, and S., Simpson. A finite combinatorial principle which is equivalent to the 1-consistency of predicative analysis. In G., Metakides, editor, Patras Symposion, pages 197–230. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
7. G., Jäger. Theories for iterated jumps, 1980. Handwritten notes.
8. G., Jäger. The strength of admissibility without foundation. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49 (3):867–879, 1984.Google Scholar
9. G., Jäger. Theories for Admissible Sets: A Unifying Approach to Proof Theory. Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1986.
10. G., Jäger, R., Kahle, A., Setzer, and T., Strahm. The proof-theoretic analysis of transfinitely iterated fixed point theories. Journal of Symbolic Logic. To appear.
11. G., Jäger and T., Strahm. Fixed point theories and dependent choice. Archive for Mathematical Logic. To appear.
12. G., Jäger and T., Strahm. Upper bounds for metapredicative Mahlo in explicit mathematics and admissible set theory. In preparation.
13. R., Kahle. Applicative Theories and Frege Structures. PhD thesis, Institut für Informatik und angewandte Mathematik, Universität Bern, 1997.
14. R., Kahle. Uniform limit in explicit mathematics with universes. Technical Report IAM-97-002, Institut für Informatik und angewandte Mathematik, Universität Bern, 1997.
15. P., Martin-Löf. Intutionistic Type Theory, volume 1 of Studies in Proof Theory. Bibliopolis, 1984.
16. M., Marzetta. Predicative Theories of Types and Names. PhD thesis, Institut f ür Informatik und angewandte Mathematik, Universität Bern, 1993.
17. M., Marzetta. Universes in the theory of types and names. In E., Börger et al., editor, Computer Science Logic '92, volume 702 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 340–351. Springer, Berlin, 1993.
18. M., Marzetta and T., Strahm. The μ quantification operator in explicit mathematics with universes and iterated fixed point theories with ordinals.Archive for Mathematical Logic, 37(5+6):391–413, 1998.Google Scholar
19. E., Palmgren. On universes in type theory. In G., Sambin and J., Smith, editors, Twentyfive Years of Type Theory. Oxford University Press. To appear.
20. W., Pohlers. Proof Theory: An Introduction, volume 1407 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 1988.
21. M., Rathjen. The strength of Martin-Löf type theory with a superuniverse. Part I.Archive for Mathematical Logic. To appear.
22. M., Rathjen. Proof-theoretic analysis of KPm. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 30:377–403., 1991.Google Scholar
23. K., Schütte. Kennzeichnung von Ordnungszahlen durch rekursiv erklärte Funktionen. Mathematische Annalen, 127:15–32, 1954.Google Scholar
24. K., Schütte. Proof Theory. Springer, Berlin, 1977.
25. S.G., Simpson. Σ1/1 and Σ1/1 transfinite induction. In D., van Dalen, D., Lascar, and J., Smiley, editors, Logic Colloquium '80, pages 239–253. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
26. S.G., Simpson. Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic. Perspectives inMathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
27. T., Strahm. First steps into metapredicativity in explicit mathematics. In S.B., Cooper and J., Truss, editors, Sets and Proofs. Cambridge University Press. To appear.
28. T., Strahm. Wellordering proofs for metapredicative Mahlo. In preparation.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×