Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:23:18.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ContinuumHypothesis

from TUTORIALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

René Cori
Affiliation:
Université de Paris VII (Denis Diderot)
Alexander Razborov
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey
Stevo Todorčević
Affiliation:
Université de Paris VII (Denis Diderot)
Carol Wood
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Logic Colloquium 2000 , pp. 143 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Donald J., Albers, Gerald L., Alexanderson, and Constance, Reid (editors), More mathematical people, Contemporary conversations, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, Boston, MA, 1990.
[2] Joan, Bagaria, Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness,Archives in Mathematical Logic, vol. 39 (2000), no. 6, pp. 393–401.
[3] Paul, Cohen, The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 50, 1963, pp. 1143–1148.
[4] Paul J., Cohen, Set theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1966.
[5] Patrick, Dehornoy, Progrés récents sur l'Hypothése du Continu [d'aprés Woodin], Séminaire Bourbaki, 55éme année, 2002–2003, #915.
[6] Solomon, Feferman, Harvey M., Friedman, Penelope, Maddy, and John R., Steel, Does mathematics need new axioms?,The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 6 (2000), no. 4, pp. 401–446.
[7] Qi, Feng, Menachem, Magidor, and Hugh, Woodin, Universally Baire sets of reals,Set Theory of the Continuum (Berkeley, CA, 1989), Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 203–242.
[8] M., Foreman, M., Magidor, and S., Shelah, Martin's Maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters, I,Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 127 (1988), no. 1, pp. 1–47.
[9] Matthew, Foreman, Generic large cardinals: new axioms for mathematics?,Proceedings of the International Congress ofMathematicians, vol. II (Berlin, 1998), 1998, (electronic), pp. 11–21.
[10] Kurt, Gödel, The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1940.
[11] Martin, Goldstern and Saharon, Shelah, The bounded proper forcing axiom, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 60 (1995), no. 1, pp. 58–73.Google Scholar
[12] Steve, Jackson, ad and the projective ordinals, Cabal seminar 81–85, Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 117–220.
[13] Akihiro, Kanamori, The emergence of descriptive set theory,From Dedekind to Gödel, Boston, MA, 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995, pp. 241–262.
[14] A., Lévy and R.M., Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 5 (1967), pp. 234–248.Google Scholar
[15] N., Luzin, Sur les ensembles projectifs de M. Henri Lebesgue, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, vol. 180 (1925), pp. 1572–1574.Google Scholar
[16] Donald A., Martin, Hilbert's first problem: the Continuum Hypothesis. Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert problems, Proceedings of the Symposium on Pure Mathematics, Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, Illinois, 1974, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1976, pp. 81–92.
[17] Donald A., Martin and John R., Steel, A proof of projective determinacy, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 2 (1989), no. 1, pp. 71–125.Google Scholar
[18] William J., Mitchell and John R., Steel, Fine structure and iteration trees, Springer, Berlin, 1994.
[19] Yiannis N., Moschovakis, Descriptive set theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.
[20] Jan, Mycielski, Axioms which imply GCH, Fundamenta Mathematicae, (2002).
[21] Jan, Mycielski and H., Steinhaus, A mathematical axiom contradicting the axiom of choice, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys., vol. 10 (1962), pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
[22] Jan, Mycielski and S., Świerczkowski, On the Lebesgue measurability and the axiom of determinateness, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 54 (1964), pp. 67–71.Google Scholar
[23] Itay, Neeman, Optimal proofs of determinacy, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 1 (1995), no. 3, pp. 327–339.Google Scholar
[24] Saharon, Shelah, The future of set theory, Set Theory of the Reals (Ramat Gan, 1991), Bar-Ilan Univ., Ramat Gan, 1993, pp. 1–12.
[25] Saharon, Shelah, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Science Publications, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
[26] Robert M., Solovay, A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 92 (1970), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
[27] Robert M., Solovay, Strongly compact cardinals and the GCH, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. XXV, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1971), American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1974, pp. 365–372.
[28] John R., Steel, The core model iterability problem, Springer, Berlin, 1996
[29] W., Wadge, Degrees of complexity of subsets of the Baire space, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 19 (1972), pp. A–714.Google Scholar
[30] Stan, Wagon, The Banach-Tarski paradox, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, with a foreword by Jan, Mycielski, corrected reprint of the 1985 original.
[31] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Axiom of Determinacy, forcing axioms, and the nonstationary ideal, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1999.
[32] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Continuum Hypothesis. I, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 48 (2001), no. 6, pp. 567–576.Google Scholar
[33] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Continuum Hypothesis. II, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 48 (2001), no. 7, pp. 681–690.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×