Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:39:30.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2020

Claire Bidart ,
Alain Degenne  and
Michel Grossetti
Claire Bidart
Affiliation:
French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Aix Marseille Univ.
Alain Degenne
Affiliation:
French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
Michel Grossetti
Affiliation:
French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS ) and the School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS)
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Living in Networks
The Dynamics of Social Relations
 , pp. 307 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Allan, G. (eds.). (1998). Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Arber, S., Attias-Donfut, C. (2000). The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Aging Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, T., Liem, R., Liem, J. J. (1986). The Social Costs of Unemployment: Implications for Social Support. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 27: 317–331.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfu, C. (2000). Rapports de générations. Transferts intrafamiliaux et dynamique macrosociale. Revue Française de Sociologie 41(4): 643–684.Google Scholar
Backstrom, L., Boldi, P., Rosa, M., Ugander, J., Vigna, S. (2012). Four Degrees of Separation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4570.Google Scholar
Berger, P., Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the Construction of Reality: An Exercise in the Microsociology of Knowledge. Diogenes 12(46): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M., Lambert, P., Prandy, K., Joye, D. (2002). Theorization, Construction and Validation of a Social Stratification Scale: Cambridge Social Interaction and Stratification Scale (CAMSIS) for Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Sociology 28(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Bergström, M. (2016). Sites de rencontres: qui les utilise en France? Qui y trouve son conjoint? Population & Sociétés 530. www.ined.fr/fichier/s_rubrique/25008/population.societes.530.site.rencontres.conjoint.fr.pdf.Google Scholar
Bernardi, L. (2004). Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 22: 527–555.Google Scholar
Bernardi, L., Keim, S., von der Lippe, H. (2007). Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Method Study in Eastern and Western Germany. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Bessin, M., Bidart, C., Grossetti, M. (eds.). (2010). Bifurcations. Les sciences sociales face aux ruptures et à l’événement. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Bidart, C. (1997). L’amitié, un lien social. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Bidart, C. (2008). Dynamiques des réseaux personnels et processus de socialisation: évolutions et influences des entourages lors des transitions vers la vie adulte. Revue Française de Sociologie 49(3): 559–583.Google Scholar
Bidart, C. (2009). En búsqueda del contenido de las redes sociales: los “móviles” de las relaciones’, “A la recherche de la substance des relations: le ressort du lien.” REDES, Revista Hispana para el Analísis de Redes Sociales 16. http://revista-redes.rediris.es/pdf-vol16/vol16_7.pdf.Google Scholar
Bidart, C. (2013). What Does Time Imply? Contributions of Longitudinal Methods to the Analysis of the Life Course. Time and Society 22(2): 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidart, C., Charbonneau, J. (2011). How to Generate Personal Networks: Issues and Tools for a Sociological Perspective. Field Methods 23(3): 266–286.Google Scholar
Bidart, C., Degenne, A., Grossetti, M. (2017). Personal Networks Typologies: A Structural Approach. Social Networks 54: 1–11.Google Scholar
Bidart, C., Lavenu, D. (2005). Evolutions of Personal Networks and Life Events. Social Networks 27(4): 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidart, C., Longo, M. E., Mendez, A. (2013). Time and Process: An Operational Framework for Processual Analysis. European Sociological Review 29(4): 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidart, C., Pellissier, A. (2002). Copains d’école, copains de travail. Evolution des modes de sociabilité d’une cohorte de jeunes. Réseaux 20(115): 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidart, C., Pellissier, A. (2007). Entre parents et enfants: liens et relations à l’épreuve du cheminement vers la vie adulte. Recherches et Prévisions 90: 29–39.Google Scholar
Bigot, R., Croutte, P. (2014). La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la société française. www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gspublication/etude-CREDOC-diffusion-TIC-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Blau, P., Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bott, E. (1971 [1957]). Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bouchet-Valat, M. (2013). Patterns and Trends of Educational and Occupational Homogamy: Evidence for France Based on Yearly Surveys (1969–2011). Spring conference of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28), Trento (Italy), May 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Bouglé, C. (1897). Qu’est-ce que la sociologie? Revue de Paris, 3(32): 533–555.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Capital social, Notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31: 2–3.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2007). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In Buckingham, David (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 119–142.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. (2002). Transitional Friends? Young People’s Strategies to Manage and Maintain Their Friendships during a Period of Repositioning. Journal of Youth Studies 5(4): 449–467.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1984). Network Items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks 6: 293–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1987). A Note on Strangers, Friends and Happiness. Social Networks 9: 311–331.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. W. (2015). Mobile Communication and Network Privatism: A Literature Review of the Implications for Diverse, Weak, and New Ties. Review of Communication Research 3(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Cardon, D. (2010). La démocratie internet. Promesses et limites. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Castrén, M. A., Maillochon, F. (2009). Who Chooses the Wedding Guests, the Couple or the Family? Individual Preferences and Relational Constraints in France and Finland. European Societies 11(3): 369–389.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.Google Scholar
Degenne, A., Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Degenne, A., Fournier, I., Marry, C., Mounier, L. (1991). Les relations sociales au cœur du marché du travail. Sociétés Contemporaines 5: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degenne, A., Lebeaux, M.-O. (1991). L’entraide entre les ménages, un facteur d’inégalité sociale? Sociétés Contemporaines 8: 21–42.Google Scholar
Degenne, A., Lebeaux, M.-O. (2004). Does Social Capital Offset Social and Economic Inequalities? Social Capital in Everyday Life. In Flap, Henk and Völker, Beate (eds.) Creation and Returns of Social Capital: A New Research Program. New York: Routledge, pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
Degenne, A., Lebeaux, M.-O. (2005). The Dynamics of Personal Networks at the Time of Entry into Adult Life. Social Networks 27(4): 337–358.Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1991). Friends, for Life: The Psychology of Personal Relationships. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(4): 681–735.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Do Online Social Media Cut through the Constraints That Limit the Size of Offline Social Networks? Royal Society Open Science 3: 150–292.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, N. (1991 [1987]). The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. The American Journal of Sociology 103(2), 281–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federico, A. de (2003). La dinámica de las redes de amistad. La elección de amigos en el programa Erasmus. REDES 4(3): 1–44.Google Scholar
Federico, A. de (2008). Amitiés Européennes. Les réseaux transnationaux des étudiants Erasmus. Informations Sociales 147, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, S. L. (1981). The Focused Organization of Social Ties. American Journal of Sociology 86(5), 1015–1035.Google Scholar
Feld, S. L. (1997). Structural Embeddedness and Stability of Interpersonal Relations. Social Networks 19, 91–95.Google Scholar
Feld, S. L., Suitor, J., Hoegh, J. G. (2007). Describing Changes in Personal Networks over Time. Field Methods 19, 218–236.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A. (2005). Réseaux de discussion hétérogènes et pluralisme cognitif. REDES 10(2). www.redalyc.org/pdf/931/93101003.pdf.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A. (2007). Confidents. Une analyse structurale de réseaux sociaux. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A., Federico, A. de (2006). Methods of Social Network Analysis. In Caselli, Graziella, Vallin, Jaques, and Wunsch, Guillaume (eds.) Demography: Analysis and Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 745–764.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A., Mounier, L. (1994). Social Discourse and Normative Influences. In Spira, A., Bajos, N., and the ACSF Group (eds.) Sexual Behaviour and AIDS. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 140–148. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00257614/fr/.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A., Mounier, L. (1996). Talking about Sexuality: An Analysis of Relations between Confidants. In Bozon, M. and Leridon, H. (eds.) Sexuality and the Social Sciences. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 265–288.Google Scholar
Ferrand, A., Mounier, L., Degenne, A. (1999). The Diversity of Personal Networks in France: Social Stratification and Relational Structures. In Wellman, B. (ed.) Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 185–224.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1993). America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact? American Sociological Review 74(4), 657–669.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (2011). Still Connected: Family and Friends in America since 1970, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Forsé, M. (1997). Capital social et employ. L’Année Sociologique 47, 143-181,Google Scholar
Forsé, M., Chauvel, L. (1995). L’évolution de l’homogamie en France: Une méthode pour comparer les diagonalités de plusieurs tables. Revue Française de Sociologie 36(1) 123–142.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., Thompson, C. R. (1989). Estimating Acquaintanceship Volume. In Kochen, Manfred (ed.) The Small World. Norwood: Ablex Publishing, pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
Furlong, A., Cartmel, F. (2007). Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Galland, O. (2007). Boundless Youth: Studies in the Transition to Adulthood, Oxford: The Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Gartrell, C. D. (1987). Network Approaches to Social Evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoffray, M. L. (2012). Contester à Cuba, Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Godechot, O. (2000). Plus d’amis, plus proches? Essai de comparaison de deux enquêtes peu comparables. Document INSEE, no. 0004.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1, 201–233.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481–510.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M. (1998). Communication électronique et réseaux sociaux. Flux 29, 5–13.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M. (2004). Sociologie de l’imprévisible. Dynamiques de l’activité et des formes sociales, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M. (2006). L’imprévisibilité dans les parcours sociaux. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 120, 5–28.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M. (2008). Proximities and Embedding Effects. European Planning Studies 16(5), 613–616.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M. (2010). Réseaux sociaux et ressources de médiation. In Liquette, Vincent (ed.) Médiations. Paris: CNRS éditions, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M., Barthe, J.-F. (2008). Dynamiques des réseaux interpersonnels et des organisations dans les créations d’entreprises. Revue Française de Sociologie 49(3), 585–612.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M., Barthe, J.-F., Chauvac, N. (2011). Studying Relational Chains from Narrative Material. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 110, 11–25.Google Scholar
Grossetti, M., Bès, M.-P. (2001). Encastrements et découplages dans les relations science – industrie. Revue Française de Sociologie 42(2), 327–355.Google Scholar
Haines, V. A., Hurlbert, J. S., Beggs, J. J. (1996). Exploring the Determinants of Support Provision: Provider Characteristics, Personal Networks, Community Contexts, and Support Following Life Events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 37(3), 252–264.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., Her, E. J., Rainie, L. (2009). Social Isolation and New Technology. How the Internet and Mobile Phones Impact Americans’ Social Networks. Pew Internet and American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Tech_and_Social_Isolation.pdf.Google Scholar
Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose Space? Differences among Users and Non-users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), 276–297.Google Scholar
Héran, F. (1988). La sociabilité, une pratique culturelle. Économie et Statistique 216, 3–22.Google Scholar
Herpin, N., Déchaux, J. H. (2004). Entraide familiale, indépendance économique et sociabilité. Économie et Statistique, 373, 3–31.Google Scholar
Hess, B. (1972). Friendship. In Riley, M. (ed.) Aging and Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hill, R. A., Dunbar, R. I. M. (2002). Social Network Size in Humans. Human Nature 14(1), 53–72.Google Scholar
Hofstra, B., Corten, R., van Tubergen, F., Ellison, N. B. (2017). Sources of Segregation in Social Networks: A Novel Approach Using Facebook. American Sociological Review 82(3), 625–656.Google Scholar
Kadushin, C. (1968). Power, Influence and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers. American Sociological Review 33(5), 685–699.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. L., Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the Life Course: Attachment, Roles and Social Support. In Baltes, P. B. and Brim, O. (eds.) Life-Span Development and Behavior, New York: Academic Press, pp. 253–86.Google Scholar
Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared Friendship Networks and the Life Course: An Analysis of Survey Data on Married and Cohabiting Couples. Social Networks 25, 231–249.Google Scholar
Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. K. (1980). The Unseen Elderly: A Study of Marginally Subsistent Hotel Dwellers. San Diego: Campanile Press.Google Scholar
Killworth, P. D., Russel, B. H. (1978). The Reversal Small World Experiment. Social Networks 1, 159–192.Google Scholar
Klein, I. K., van Tilburg, T. (1999). Broken Ties: Reciprocity and Other Factors Affecting the Termination of Older Adults’ Relationships. Social Networks 21, 131–146.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Boase, J. (2014). Tele-Cocooning: Mobile Texting and Social Scope. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3), 681–694.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organization. In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. G. (eds.) Networks and Organization: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239.Google Scholar
Lahire, B. (2011). The Plural Actor. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lazega, E. (2001). The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Gall, D. (1998). Family Conflicts in France through the Eyes of Teenagers. In Klein, Renata (ed.) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Family Violence in Europe. London: Routledge, 79–109.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Scherngell, T., Barber, M. J. (2011). Investigating an Online Social Network Using Spatial Interaction Models. Social Networks 33, 129–133.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, M. H. D., van Maas, I. (2005). Endogamy and Social Class in History: An Overview. International Review for Social History 50 (Supplement), 1–23.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., Perrin, A. (2015) “Teens (2015). Technology and Friendships.” Pew Research Center, August, 2015. www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/06/teens-technology-and-friendships/.Google Scholar
Leslie, L., Grady, K. (1985). Changes in Mothers’ Social Networks and Social Support Following Divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family 47, 663–673.Google Scholar
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two Modes of Maintaining Interpersonal Relations through Telephone: From the Domestic to the Mobile Phone. In Katz, J. (ed.) Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Communication Technology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 171–186Google Scholar
Licoppe, C., Smoreda, Z. (2005). Are Social Networks Technologically Embedded? How Networks Are Changing Today with Changes in Communication Technology. Social Networks 27(4), 317–335.Google Scholar
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lopata, Z., Maines, D. R. (eds.). (1981). Research in the Interweave of Social Roles: Friendship. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Lubbers, M. J., Molina, J. L., Lerner, J., Brandes, U., Avila, J., Mc Carty, C. (2010). Longitudinal Analysis of Personal Networks: The Case of Argentinean Migrants in Spain. Social Networks 32, 91–104.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marin, A. (2004). Are Respondents More Likely to List Alters with Certain Characteristics? Implications for Name Generator Data. Social Networks 26, 289–307.Google Scholar
Mark, N. P. (2003). Culture and Competition: Homophily and Distancing Explanation for Cultural Niches. American Sociological Review 68(3), 319–345.Google Scholar
Marry, C. (1983). Origine sociale et réseaux d’insertion des jeunes ouvriers. Formation-Emploi 4, 3–15.Google Scholar
Marry, C. (1984). Les jeunes et l’emploi, force et faiblesse des liens forts. In Coutrot, L. and Dubar, C. (eds.) Cheminements professionnels et mobilités sociales, Paris: La Documentation Française, pp. 300–324.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52(1), 122–131.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in Confiding Relations. Social Networks 10, 57–76.Google Scholar
Matou, P., Todo, Y., Ishikawa, T. (2014). Emergence of Multiplex Mobile Phone Communication Networks across Rural Areas: An Ethiopian Experiment. Network Science 2(2), 162–188.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. American Sociological Review 71, 353–375.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Brashears, M. E. (2009). Reply to Fischer: Models and Marginals: Using Survey Evidence to Study Social Networks. American Sociological Review 74(4), 670–681.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. ed. Morris, Charles W.. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, P.-A., de Gournay, C., Smoreda, Z. (2002). Si loin, si proches: liens et communications à l’épreuve du déménagement. Réseaux 115, 121–150.Google Scholar
Mercken, L., Snijders, T., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., de Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of Adolescent Friendship Networks and Smoking Behavior. Social Networks 32, 72–81.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mesch, G. de, Talmud, I. (2000). Similarity and Quality of Social Relationships among Adolescents. Haifa: The University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship Networks in Developing Relationships: Converging and Diverging Social Environments. Social Psychology Quarterly 45(3), 162–172.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1967). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today 1, 61–67.Google Scholar
Miller McPherson, J., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 415–444.Google Scholar
Mizuko, I., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., Tripp, L. (with Antin, J., Finn, M., Law, A., Manion, A., Mitnick, S., Schlossberg, D., Yardi, Sarita) (2009). Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mok, D., Wellman, B., Carrasco, J. (2010). Does Distance Matter in the Age of the Internet? Urban Studies 47(13), 2747–2783.Google Scholar
Molina, J. L., Lerner, J., Gómez Mestres, S. (2008). Patrones de cambio de las redes personales de inmigrantes en Cataluña. REDES 15, 50–63.Google Scholar
Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., Flap, H. (2008). Social Contexts and Personal Relationships: The Effect of Meeting Opportunities on Similarity for Relationships of Different Strengths. Social Networks 30, 60–68.Google Scholar
Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., Flap, H. (2014). Changes in Personal Relationships: How Social Contexts Affect the Emergence and Discontinuation of Relationships. Social Networks 37, 67–80.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (1990). Structural Determinants of Men’s and Women’s Personal Networks. American Sociological Review 55(5), 726–735.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L., Neal, M. B., Carder, P. (1996). The Stability of Core and Peripheral Networks over Time. Social Networks 19, 9–25.Google Scholar
Mounier, L. (1999). A quoi peuvent servir les relations sociales des jeunes? Agora 17, 47–62.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3), 420–435.Google Scholar
Padgett, J., Ansell, C. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98, 1259–1319.Google Scholar
Paik, A., Sanchagrin, K. (2013). Social Isolation in America: An Artifact. American Sociological Review 78(3), 339–360.Google Scholar
Paine, R. (1970). Anthropological Approaches to Friendship. Journal of the Institute of Man 1, 139–159.Google Scholar
Park, N., Lee, S., Kim, J. H. (2012). Individuals’ Personal Network Characteristics and Patterns of Facebook Use: A Social Network Approach. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1700–1707.Google Scholar
Paugam, S. (2012). The Paradox of exclusion: Crossed Considerations on the Contemporary Forms of Broken Social Links. In Humbert, Marc and Sato, Yoshimichi (eds.) Social Exclusion: Perspectives from France and Japan. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
Perrin, A. (2015). Social Networking Usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center. www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015.Google Scholar
Portes, A. (1995). The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Prouteau, L., Wolff, F.-C. (2003). Les services informels entre ménages: une dimension méconnue du bénévolat. Economie et Statistique 368, 3–31.Google Scholar
Rainie, L., Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S., Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 91–115.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Thomas, R. (2012). Searching for a Mate: The Rise of the Internet As a Social Intermediary. American Sociological Review 77(4), 523–547.Google Scholar
Russel Bernard, H., Johnsen, E. C., Killworth, P. D., McCarty, C., Shelley, G. A. (1990). Estimating the Size of Personal Networks. Social Networks 12(4), 289–312.Google Scholar
Russel Bernard, H., Shelley, G. H., Killworth, P. (1987). How Much of a Network Does the GSS and RSW Dredge Up. Social Networks 9, 49–61.Google Scholar
Schnettler, S. (2009). A Structured Overview of 50 Years of Small-World Research. Social Networks 31, 165–178.Google Scholar
Shanyang, Z. (2006). Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Differentiated Analysis of Internet Use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 844–862.Google Scholar
Silver, A. A. (1989). Friendship and Trust As Moral Ideals: An Historical Approach. European Journal of Sociology 30, p. 274–297.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1990 [1900]). The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simmel, G., Wolff, K. H. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Small, M. L. (2013). Weak Ties and the Core Discussion Network: Why People Discuss Important Matters with Unimportant Alters. Social Networks 35, 470–483.Google Scholar
Small, M. L. (2017). Someone to Talk to. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Small, M. L., Vontrese, D. P., McMahan, P. (2015). How Stable Is the Core Discussion Network? Social Networks 40, 90–102.Google Scholar
Small, M. L., Sukhu, C. (2016). Because They Were There: Access, Deliberation, and the Mobilization of Networks for Support. Social Networks 47, 73–84.Google Scholar
Smits, J., Ultee, W., Lammers, J. (2000). More or Less Educational Homogamy? A Test of Different Versions of Modernization Theory Using Cross-Temporal Evidence for 60 Countries. American Sociological Review 65(5), 781–788.Google Scholar
Smoreda, Z. (2008). Sociabilités ordinaires, réseaux sociaux et médiations des technologies de communication. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Est.Google Scholar
Sola Pool, I. de (1978). Contacts and Influence. Social Networks 1, 5–51.Google Scholar
Tazé, S., Ferrand, A. (2007). Les savoirs profanes sur le sida: des incertitudes rationnelles aux certitudes relationnelles. Sociologie Santé 26, 31–48.Google Scholar
Terhell, E. L., Van Groenou, B. M. I., Van Tilburg, T. (2007). Network Contact Changes in Early and Later Post-Separation Years. Social Networks 29, 11–24.Google Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices. Social Forces 56(2), 576–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M. (1979). Multiplexity in Adult Friendship. Social Forces 57(4), 1286–1309.Google Scholar
Vincent-Buffault, A. (1995). L’exercice de l’amitié. Pour une histoire des pratiques amicales aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Völker, B., Flap, H. (2001). Weak Ties As a Liability: The Case of East Germany. Rationality and Society 13 (4), 397–428Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective Dynamics of “Small-world” Networks. Nature 393(1), 440–442.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1979). The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers. The American Journal of Sociology 84(5), 1201–1231.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Frank, O., Espinoza, V., Lundquist, S., Wilson, C. (1991). Integrating Individual, Relational and Structural Analysis. Social Networks 13, pp. 223–249Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities. Urban Affairs Review 14(3), 363–390.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Wong, R. Y., Tindall, D., Nazer, N. (1997). A Decade of Network Change: Turnover, Persistence and Stability in Personal Communities. Social Networks 19, 27–50.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Quan‐Haase, A., Witte, J., Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3), 436–455Google Scholar
White, H. C. (2008). Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Willmott, P. (1986). Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social Network Changes and Life Events across the Lifespan: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1, 53–80.Google Scholar
Zhao, S. (2006). Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Differentiated Analysis of Internet Use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 844–862.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Claire Bidart, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Aix Marseille Univ., Alain Degenne, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Michel Grossetti, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS ) and the School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS)
  • Book: Living in Networks
  • Online publication: 27 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882392.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Claire Bidart, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Aix Marseille Univ., Alain Degenne, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Michel Grossetti, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS ) and the School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS)
  • Book: Living in Networks
  • Online publication: 27 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882392.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Claire Bidart, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Aix Marseille Univ., Alain Degenne, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Michel Grossetti, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS ) and the School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS)
  • Book: Living in Networks
  • Online publication: 27 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882392.019
Available formats
×