Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:15:47.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2019

Robert J. Meyer-Lee
Robert J. Meyer-Lee
Affiliation:
Agnes Scott College, Decatur
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales , pp. 265 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Archibald, Elizabeth. “The Breton Lay in Middle English: Genre, Transmission and the Franklin’s Tale.” In Medieval Insular Romance: Translation and Innovation, ed. Weiss, Judith, Fellows, Jennifer, and Dickson, Morgan. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000.Google Scholar
Arnovick, Leslie. “Dorigen’s Promise and Scholars’ Premise: The Orality of the Speech Act in the Franklin’s Tale.” In Oral Poetics in Middle English Poetry, ed. Amodio, Mark C.. New York: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar
Ashe, Laura. “Reading like a Clerk in the Clerk’s Tale.” The Modern Language Review 101 (2006): 935–44.Google Scholar
Astell, Ann W. The Song of Songs in the Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Astell, Ann W.Chaucer and the Universe of Learning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek. The Singularity of Literature. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Bahr, Arthur. Fragments and Assemblages: Forming Compilations of Medieval London. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Robert L. “The English Customs Service, 1307–1343: A Study of Medieval Administration.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society n.s. 51 (1961).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Barron, Caroline M. “Chaucer the Poet and Chaucer the Pilgrim.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Baswell, Christopher. Virgil in Medieval England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bate, Walter Jackson, ed. Criticism: The Major Texts. Enlarged ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970.Google Scholar
Battles, Paul. “Magic and Metafiction in the Franklin’s Tale: Chaucer’s Clerk of Orléans as Double of the Franklin.” In Marvels, Monsters, and Miracles: Studies in the Medieval and Early Modern Imaginations, ed. Jones, Timothy S. and Sprunger, David A.. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
Benson, C. David. Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Benson, Donald R. “The Marriage ‘Encomium’ in the Merchant’s Tale: A Chaucerian Crux.” The Chaucer Review 14 (1979): 48–60.Google Scholar
Berry, Craig A. “Flying Sources: Classical Authority in Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale.” ELH 68 (2001): 287–313.Google Scholar
Berry, George Ricker, ed. Interlinear Greek-English New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1984.Google Scholar
Bertolet, Craig E. Chaucer, Gower, Hoccleve and the Commercial Practices of Late Fourteenth-Century London. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Beston, John B. “How Much Was Known of the Breton Lai in Fourteenth-Century England?” In The Learned and the Lewed: Studies in Chaucer and Medieval Literature, ed. Benson, Larry D.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Bible. The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, with the Apocryphal Books, in the Earliest English Versions Made from the Latin Vulgate by John Wycliffe and His Followers. Ed. Rev. Forshall, Josiah and Sir Madden, Frederic. 4 vols. Oxford: University Press, 1850.Google Scholar
BibleBiblia Sacra iuxta Vulgatam versionem. Ed. Gryson, Roger et al. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2007.Google Scholar
BibleThe Clementine Vulgate Project. http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/. 2005. (For Migne’s Glossa and the Douay-Rheims.)Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. The Textual Tradition of the Canterbury Tales. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F.“The Links in the Canterbury Tales.” In New Perspectives on Middle English Texts, ed. Powell, Susan and Smith, Jeremy J.. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000.Google Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bleeth, Kenneth. “The Physician’s Tale.” In Sources and Analogues, ed. Correale and Hamel.Google Scholar
Blenner-Hassett, Roland. “Autobiographical Aspects of Chaucer’s Franklin.” Speculum 28 (1953): 791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodden, M. C. Language as the Site of Revolt in Medieval and Early Modern England: Speaking as a Woman. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero. Chaucer and the Imaginary World of Fame. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre.The Field of Cultural Production. Trans. Randal Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bowers, John M., ed. The Canterbury Tales: Fifteenth-Century Continuations and Additions. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 1992.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles F. “The Clerk.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Bronson, Bertrand H. “Afterthoughts on the Merchant’s Tale.” Studies in Philology 58 (1961): 583–96.Google Scholar
Brown, Jr., Emerson. “Chaucer, the Merchant, and Their Tale: Getting beyond Old Controversies: Part 1.” The Chaucer Review 13 (1978): 141–56.Google Scholar
Brown, Jr., Emerson“Chaucer, the Merchant, and Their Tale: Getting beyond Old Controversies: Part II.” The Chaucer Review 13 (1979): 247–62Google Scholar
Brown, Peter, and Butcher, Andrew. The Age of Saturn: Literature and History in the Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Burger, Glenn. Chaucer’s Queer Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. A. “Poems without Endings.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 13 (1991): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis. The Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cahn, Kenneth S. “Chaucer’s Merchants and the Foreign Exchange: An Introduction to Medieval Finance.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 2 (1980): 81–119.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher. From Literacy to Literature: England, 1300–1400. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016Google Scholar
Carlin, Martha. “The Host.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Carlson, David R. Chaucer’s Jobs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Carney, Clíodhna. “The Franklin’s Tale: The Generous Father and the Spendthrift Son.” In Transmission and Generation in Medieval and Renaissance Literature: Essays in Honour of John Scattergood, ed. Hodder, Karen and O’Connell, Brendan. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Carney, Clíodhna“How to Say ‘I’: The Clerk, the Wife and Petrarch.” In Chaucer’s Poetry: Words, Authority and Ethics, ed. Carney, Clíodhna and McCormack, Frances. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. “The Gentilesse of Chaucer’s Franklin.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 23 (1981): 283–300.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer. Ed. Tyrwhitt, Thomas. 5 vols. London: T. Payne, 1775–78.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey.The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Skeat, W. W.. 7 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894–97.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey.The Squire’s Tale. Ed. Baker, Donald C.. The Variorum Chaucer. Vol. 2, part 12. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey.The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Mann, Jill. London: Penguin Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey.The Canterbury Tales: Fifteen Tales and the General Prologue. Ed. Olson, Glending and Kolve, V. A.. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2005.Google Scholar
Chickering, Howell. “Form and Interpretation in the Envoy to the Clerk’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 29 (1995): 352–72.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. P. Chaucer and Italian Textuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, Alan B. English University Life in the Middle Ages. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Coghill, Nevill. The Poet Chaucer. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Coleman, Olive. “The Collectors of Customs in London under Richard II.” In Studies in London History Presented to Philip Edmund Jones, ed. Hollaender, A. E. J. and Kellaway, William. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1969.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen. The Structure of the Canterbury Tales. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Correale, Robert M. and Hamel, Mary, eds. Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales. 2 vols. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2005.Google Scholar
Coss, Peter. “Literature and Social Terminology: The Vavasour in England.” In Social Relations and Ideas: Essays in Honour of R. H. Hilton, ed. Aston, T. H. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Coss, Peter.The Origins of the English Gentry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Coss, Peter.“The Franklin.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. Schools and Scholars in Fourteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan. “The Franklin as Dorigen.” The Chaucer Review 24 (1990): 236–52.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan.Gender and Romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan.Animal Encounters: Contacts and Concepts in Medieval Britain. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Crocker, Holly A. Chaucer’s Visions of Manhood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Holly A.“Performative Passivity and Fantasies of Masculinity in the Merchant’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 38 (2003): 178–98.Google Scholar
Da Rold, Orietta. “New Challenges to the Editing of Chaucer.” In Probable Truth: Editing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Gillespie, Vincent and Hudson, Anne. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.Google Scholar
David, Alfred. “Literary Satire in the House of Fame.” PMLA 75 (1960): 333–39.Google Scholar
David, Alfred.The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
David, Alfred.“Recycling Anelida and Arcite: Chaucer as a Source for Chaucer.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer. Proceedings. 1 (1984): 105–15.Google Scholar
Davis, Isabel. Writing Masculinity in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Davis, James. Medieval Market Morality: Life, Law and Ethics in the English Marketplace, 1200–1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Dempster, Germaine. “The Original Teller of the Merchant’s Tale.” Modern Philology 36 (1938): 1–8.Google Scholar
Denny-Brown, Andrea. Fashioning Change: The Trope of Clothing in High- and Late-Medieval England. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dillon, Bert. “A Clerk Ther Was of Oxenford Also.” In Chaucer’s Pilgrims, ed. Lambdin, and Lambdin, .Google Scholar
DiMarco, Vincent. “The Historical Basis of Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale.” Edebiyât: The Journal of Middle Eastern Literatures 1 (1989): 1–22.Google Scholar
DiMarco, Vincent.“The Dialogue of Science and Magic in Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale.” In Dialogische Strukturen/Dialogic Structures: Festschrift fur Willi Erzgraber zum 70, ed. Kuhn, Thomas and Schaefer, Ursula. Tubingen: Gunter Narr, 1996.Google Scholar
DiMarco, Vincent.“The Squire’s Tale.” In Sources and Analogues, ed. Correale, and Hamel, .Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. Talbot. Speaking of Chaucer. London: The Athlone Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. I., and Parkes, M. B.. “A Paleographical Introduction.” In The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription of the Hengwrt Manuscript, ed. Ruggiers, Paul G.. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1979Google Scholar
Dyer, Christopher. Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages: Social Change in England c. 1200–1520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Eberle, Patricia J. “Commercial Language and the Commercial Outlook in the General Prologue.” The Chaucer Review 18 (1983): 161–74.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. “The Merchant’s Tale and Moral Chaucer.” Modern Language Quarterly 51 (1990): 409–26.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert R. “Narration and Doctrine in the Merchant’s Tale.” Speculum 66 (1991): 342–67.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert R.“Some Pious Talk about Marriage: Two Speeches from the Canterbury Tales.” In Matrons and Marginal Women in Medieval Society, ed. Edwards, Robert R. and Ziegler, Vickie. Woodbridge, Suffollk: Boydell Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert R.“The Franklin’s Tale.” In Sources and Analogues, ed. Correale and Hamel.Google Scholar
Epstein, Robert. Chaucer’s Gifts: The Logic of Exchange in the Canterbury Tales, 2018.Google Scholar
Evans, T. A. R. “The Number, Origins, and Careers of Scholars.” In The History of the University of Oxford, ed. Catto, J. I. and Evans, T. A. R.. 8 vols. 2: Late Medieval Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Farber, Lianna. An Anatomy of Trade in Medieval Writing: Value, Consent, and Community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas J. “The ‘Envoy de Chaucer’ and the Clerk’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 24 (1990): 329–36.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas J.“The Chronotopes of Monology in Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale.” In Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, ed. Farrell, Thomas J.. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1995.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas J.“Austin, Joyce, O’Brian, and Chaucer’s Squire: Bakhtin and Medieval Narratology.” Medieval Perspectives 23 (2008): 31–42.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas J.“Hybrid Discourse in the General Prologue Portraits.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 30 (2008): 39–93.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas J., and Goodwin, Amy W.. “The Clerk’s Tale.” In Sources and Analogues, ed. Correale and Hamel.Google Scholar
Fein, Susanna. “Boethian Boundaries: Compassion and Constraint in the Franklin’s Tale.” In Drama, Narrative and Poetry in the Canterbury Tales, ed. Harding, Wendy. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2003.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. “‘Context Stinks!’” New Literary History 42 (2011): 573–91.Google Scholar
Ferster, Judith. “Interpretation and Imitation in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale.” In Medieval Literature: Criticism, Ideology, & History, ed. Aers, David. New York: St. Martin’s, 1986.Google Scholar
Finlayson, John. “The Form of the Middle English Lay.” The Chaucer Review 19 (1985): 352–68.Google Scholar
Finlayson, John.“The Merchant’s Tale: Literary Contexts, the Play of Genres, and Institutionalized Sexual Relations.” Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 121 (2003): 557–80.Google Scholar
Flake, Timothy H. “Love, Trouthe, and the Happy Ending of the Franklin’s Tale.” English Studies 77 (1996): 209–26.Google Scholar
Fleming, John. “Chaucer’s Clerk and John of Salisbury.” English Language Notes 2 (1964): 5–6.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Fowler, Elizabeth. Literary Character: The Human Figure in Early English Writing. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fradenburg, L. O. Aranye. “Simply Marvelous.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 26 (2004): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froissart, Sir John. Chronicles of England, France, Spain and the Adjoining Countries, from the Latter Part of the Reign of Edward II. to the Coronation of Henry IV. Trans. Thomas Johnes, Esq. 2 vols. London: William Smith, 1839.Google Scholar
Frow, John. Cultural Studies and Cultural Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. A Temporary Preface to the Six-Text Edition of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales Part I. London: N. Trübner for the Chaucer Society, 1868.Google Scholar
Furrow, Melissa. Expectations of Romance: The Reception of a Genre in Medieval England. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2009.Google Scholar
Fyler, John M. “Domesticating the Exotic in the Squire’s Tale.” ELH 55 (1988): 1–26.Google Scholar
Galloway, Andrew. “Petrarch’s Pleasures, Chaucer’s Revulsions, and the Aesthetics of Renunciation in Late-Medieval Culture.” In Answerable Style, ed. Grady and Galloway.Google Scholar
Ganim, John M. Chaucerian Theatricality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Gaylord, Alan. “A85-88: Chaucer’s Squire and the Glorious Campaign.” Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 45 (1960): 341–61.Google Scholar
Gaylord, Alan.“The Promises in The Franklin’s Tale.” ELH 31 (1964): 331–65.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Warren. The Cast of Character: The Representation of Personality in Ancient and Medieval Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Warren.Chaucer’s Italian Tradition. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Warren.Tellers, Tales, and Translation in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Given-Wilson, Chris. The English Nobility in the Late Middle Ages: The Fourteenth-Century Political Community. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987.Google Scholar
Glossa Ordinaria. Pars 22, In Canticum Canticorum. Ed. Dove, Mary. 170. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Goddard, Richard. “The Merchant.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Goodman, Jennifer R. “Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale and the Rise of Chivalry.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 5 (1983): 127–36.Google Scholar
Gower, John. The Complete Works of John Gower. Ed. Macaulay, G. C.. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899–1902.Google Scholar
Grady, Frank and Galloway, Andrew, eds. Answerable Style: The Idea of the Literary in Medieval England. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth. Poets and Princepleasers: Literature and the English Court in the Late Middle Ages. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Green, Richard FirthA Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth“Griselda in Siena.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 33 (2011): 3–38.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth“Why Marquis Walter Treats His Wife So Badly.” The Chaucer Review 47 (2012): 48–62.Google Scholar
Greene, Darragh. “Moral Obligations, Virtue Ethics, and Gentil Character in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 50 (2015): 88–107.Google Scholar
Hagen, Susan K. “Chaucer’s May, Standup Comics, and Critics.” In Chaucer’s Humor: Critical Essays, ed. Jost, Jean E.. New York: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar
Haller, Robert S. “Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale and the Uses of Rhetoric.” Modern Philology 62 (1965): 285–95.Google Scholar
Hammond, E. P. Chaucer: A Bibliographical Manual. New York: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Hanawalt, Barbara A. Growing Up in Medieval London: The Experience of Childhood in History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Harden, J. M. Dictionary of the Vulgate New Testament. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1921.Google Scholar
Hersh, Cara. “‘Knowledge of the Files’: Subverting Bureaucratic Legibility in the Franklin’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 43 (2009): 428–54.Google Scholar
Hines, John. The Fabliau in English. London: Longman, 1993.Google Scholar
Hodges, Laura F. Chaucer and Costume: The Secular Pilgrims in the General Prologue. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000.Google Scholar
Hodges, Laura F.Chaucer and Clothing: Clerical and Academic Costume in the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2005.Google Scholar
Holman, C. Hugh. “Courtly Love in the Merchant’s and the Franklin’s Tales.” ELH 18 (1951): 241–52.Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon. “Compiling the Canterbury Tales in Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts.” The Chaucer Review 47 (2013): 372–89.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald R. The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hsy, Jonathan. Trading Tongues: Merchants, Multilingualism, and Medieval Literature. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hume, Kathyrn. “Why Chaucer Calls the Franklin’s Tale a Breton Lai.” Philological Quarterly 51 (1972): 365–79.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia Clare. The Medieval New: Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Johnson, Oscar E. “Was Chaucer’s Merchant in Debt? A Study in Chaucerian Syntax and Rhetoric.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 52 (1953): 50–57.Google Scholar
Johnston, Andrew James. Clerks and Courtiers: Chaucer, Late Middle English Literature and the State Formation Process. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 2001.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael. “Mercantile Gentility in Cambridge, University Library MS Ff.2.38.” In Truth and Tales: Cultural Mobility and Medieval Media, ed. Somerset, Fiona and Watson, Nicholas. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Jones, Lindsey M. “Chaucer’s Anxiety of Poetic Craft: The Squire’s Tale.” Style 41 (2007): 300–18.Google Scholar
Jones, Mike Rodman. “January’s Genesis: Biblical Exegesis and Chaucer’s Merchant’s Tale.” Leeds Studies in English n.s. 39 (2008): 53–87.Google Scholar
Jordan, Carmel. “Soviet Archeology and the Setting of the Squire’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 22 (1987): 128–40.Google Scholar
Jordan, Robert M. Chaucer and the Shape of Creation: The Aesthetic Possibilities of Inorganic Structure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, Gregory. Fiction Agonistes: In Defense of Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kamowski, William. “Trading the ‘Knotte’ for Loose Ends: The Squire’s Tale and the Poetics of Chaucerian Fragments.” Style 31 (1997): 391–412.Google Scholar
Karnes, Michelle. “Wonders, Marvels, and Metaphor in the Squire’s Tale.” ELH 82 (2015): 461–90.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. From Boys to Men: Formations of Masculinity in Late Medieval Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Keen, Maurice. Origins of the English Gentleman: Heraldry, Chivalry and Gentility in Medieval England, c. 1300–c. 1500. Stroud: Tempus, 2002.Google Scholar
Kermode, Jenny. Medieval Merchants: York, Beverley and Hull in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kirk, Elizabeth D. “Nominalism and the Dynamics of the Clerk’s Tale: Homo Viator as Woman.” In Chaucer’s Religious Tales, ed. David Benson, C. and Robertson, Elizabeth. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer, 1990.Google Scholar
Kiser, Lisa J. Truth and Textuality in Chaucer’s Poetry. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1991.Google Scholar
Kittredge, George Lyman. Chaucer and His Poetry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Knapp, Peggy. Chaucer and the Social Contest. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Knapp, James F., and Knapp, Peggy A.. Medieval Romance: The Aesthetics of Possibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Knopp, Sherron. “Poetry as Conjuring Act: The Franklin’s Tale and The Tempest.” The Chaucer Review 38 (2004): 337–54.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A. “Rocky Shores and Pleasure Gardens: Poetry vs. Magic in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale.” In Poetics: Theory and Practice in Medieval English Literature, ed. Boitani, Piero and Torti, Anna. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1991.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A.Telling Images: Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative II. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kordecki, Lesley. Ecofeminist Subjectivities: Chaucer’s Talking Birds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Ladd, Roger A. Antimercantilism in Late Medieval English Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Lambdin, Laura C. and Lambdin, Robert T., eds. Chaucer’s Pilgrims: An Historical Guide to the Pilgrims in The Canterbury Tales. Westport: Greenwood, 1996.Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. The Merchant in the Confessional: Trade and Price in the Pre-Reformation Penitential Handbooks. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Langland, William. Piers Plowman: A New Annotated Edition of the C-text, ed. Pearsall, Derek. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Larson, Charles. “The Squires Tale: Chaucer’s Evolution from the Dream Vision.” Revue des Langues Vivantes 43 (1977): 598–607.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno.Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno.“An Attempt at a Compositionist Manifesto.” New Literary History 41 (2010): 471–90.Google Scholar
Lawton, David. Chaucer’s Narrators. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1985.Google Scholar
Lawton, David.Voice in Later Medieval English Literature: Public Interiorities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, B. S. “Apollo’s Chariot and the Christian Subtext of The Franklin’s Tale.” Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures 36 (2010): 47–67.Google Scholar
Lee, B. S.“The Question of Closure in Fragment V of The Canterbury Tales.” Yearbook of English Studies 22 (1992): 190–200.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall Jr.. The Disenchanted Self: Representing the Subject in the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lightsey, Scott. Manmade Marvels in Medieval Culture and Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Lipton, Emma. Affections of the Mind: The Politics of Sacramental Marriage in Late Medieval English Literature. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Loomis, Laura Hibbard. “Chaucer and the Breton Lays of the Auchinleck MS.” Studies in Philology 38 (1941): 14–33.Google Scholar
Loomis, Laura Hibbard.“Secular Dramatics in the Royal Palace, Paris, 1378, 1389, and Chaucer’s ‘Tregetoures.’” Speculum 33 (1958): 242–55.Google Scholar
Luengo, Anthony E. “Magic and Illusion in The Franklin’s Tale.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 77 (1978): 1–16.Google Scholar
Lumiansky, R. M. Of Sondry Folk: The Dramatic Principle in the Canterbury Tales. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Lynch, Kathryn L. “East Meets West in Chaucer’s Squire’s and Franklin’s Tales.” Speculum 70 (1995): 530–51.Google Scholar
Lynch, Kathryn L.ed. Chaucer’s Cultural Geography. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Lytle, Guy Fitch. “Patronage Patterns and Oxford Colleges c. 1300-c. 1530.” In The University In Society, ed. Stone, Lawrence. 2 vols. Volume 1: Oxford and Cambridge from the 14th to the Early 19th Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Lytle, Guy Fitch“The Social Origins of Oxford Students in the Late Middle Ages: New College, c. 1380–c. 1510.” In The Universities in the Late Middle Ages, ed. Ijsewijn, Jozef and Paquet, Jacques. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Lytle, Guy Fitch“The Careers of Oxford Students in the Later Middle Ages.” In Rebirth, Reform and Resilience: Universities in Transition 1300–1700, ed. Kittelson, James M. and Transue, Pamela J.. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Maddern, Philippa. “Gentility.” In Gentry Culture, ed. Radulescu, and Truelove, .Google Scholar
Mandel, Jerome. Geoffrey Chaucer: Building the Fragments of the Canterbury Tales. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill. Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the “General Prologue” to the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill.Feminizing Chaucer. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2002.Google Scholar
Martindale, Wight, Jr. “Chaucer’s Merchants: A Trade-Based Speculation on Their Activities.” The Chaucer Review 26 (1992): 309–16.Google Scholar
Matheson, Lister M. “Chaucer’s Ancestry: Historical and Philological Re-Assessments.” The Chaucer Review 25 (1991): 171–89.Google Scholar
McDonie, R. Jacob. “‘Ye gete namoore of me’: Narrative, Textual, and Linguistic Desires in Chaucer’s Merchant’s Tale.” Exemplaria 24 (2012): 313–41.Google Scholar
McNamara, John. “Chaucer’s Use of the Epistle of St. James in the Clerk’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 7 (1973): 184–93.Google Scholar
Mertes, Kate. The English Noble Household 1250–1600: Good Governance and Politic Rule. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J. “Manuscript Studies, Literary Value, and the Object of Chaucer Studies.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 30 (2008): 1–37.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J.“Fragments IV and V of the Canterbury Tales Do Not Exist.” The Chaucer Review 45 (2010): 1–31.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J.“Toward a Theory and Practice of Literary Valuing.” New Literary History 46 (2015): 335–55.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J., and Sanok, Catherine, eds. The Medieval Literary: Beyond Form. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Anne. “The Idea of Public Poetry in the Reign of Richard II.” Speculum 53 (1978): 94–114.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne.“Chaucer’s ‘New Men’ and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales.” In Literature and Society: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1978, ed. Said, Edward W.. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne.“The Clerk and His Tale: Some Literary Contexts.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 2 (1980): 121–50.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne.Chaucer, Langland, and Fourteenth-Century Literary History. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Miller, Robert P. “Augustinian Wisdom and Eloquence in the F-Fragment of the Canterbury Tales.” Mediaevalia 4 (1978): 245–75.Google Scholar
Miller, Robert P.“The Epicurean Homily on Marriage by Chaucer’s Franklin.” Mediaevalia 6 (1980): 151–86.Google Scholar
Mills, Mabel H., F.S.A. “The London Customs House during the Middle Ages.” Archaeologia 83 (1933): 307–25.Google Scholar
Mills, Mabel H.“The Collectors of Customs.” In The English Government at Work, 1327–1336, ed. Morris, William A. and Strayer, Joseph R.. 3 vols. 2: Fiscal Administration. Cambridge: The Mediaeval Academy of America, 1947.Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J. Fallible Authors: Chaucer’s Pardoner and Wife of Bath. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J., with Scattergood, V. J. and Smith, J. J.. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Shorter Poems. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Stubbs, Estelle. Scribes and the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375–1425. Woodbridge: York Medieval Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Morse, Charlotte C. “The Exemplary Griselda.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 7 (1985): 51–86.Google Scholar
Morse, Charlotte C.“The Value of Editing the Clerk’s Tale for the Variorum Chaucer.” In Manuscripts and Texts: Editorial Problems in Later Middle English Literature, ed. Pearsall, Derek. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1987.Google Scholar
Morse, Charlotte C.“Critical Approaches to the Clerk’s Tale.” In Chaucer’s Religious Tales, ed. David Benson, C. and Robertson, Elizabeth. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer, 1990.Google Scholar
Murray, Alexander. “The Epicureans.” In Intellectuals and Writers in Fourteenth-Century Europe: The J. A. W. Bennett Memorial Lectures, ed. Boitani, Piero and Torti, Anna. Tübingen: G. Narr, 1986.Google Scholar
Murrin, Michael. Trade and Romance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Neuse, Richard. “Marriage and the Question of Allegory in the Merchant’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 24 (1989): 115–31.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Pamela. A Medieval Mercantile Community: The Grocers’ Company and the Politics and Trade of London 1000–1485. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
North, J. D. Chaucer’s Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Nowlin, Steele. “Between Precedent and Possibility: Liminality, Historicity, and Narrative in Chaucer’s The Franklin’s Tale.” Studies in Philology 103 (2006): 47–67.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Olson, Donald W., Laird, Edgard S., and Lytle, Thomas E.. “High Tides and The Canterbury Tales.” Sky and Telescope 99 (2000): 44–49.Google Scholar
Olson, Glending. Literature as Recreation in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Orme, Nicholas. “Chaucer and Education.” The Chaucer Review 16 (1981): 38–59.Google Scholar
Orme, Nicholas.From Childhood to Chivalry: The Education of the English Kings and Aristocracy 1066–1530. London: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Parsons, Ben. “No Laughing Matter: Fraud, the Fabliau and Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale.” Neophilologus 96 (2012): 121–36.Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen. “Minding the Gaps: Intepreting the Manuscript Evidence of the Cook’s Tale and the Squire’s Tale.” In The English Medieval Book: Studies in Memory of Jeremy Griffiths, ed. Edwards, A. S. G., Gillespie, Vincent, and Hanna, Ralph. London: The British Library, 2000.Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen.“‘The Makere of this Boke’: Chaucer’s ‘Retraction’ and the Author as Scribe and Compiler.” In Author, Reader, Book: Medieval Authorship in Theory and Practice, ed. Partridge, Stephen and Kwakkel, Erik. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee.Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Pearcy, Roy J. “Chaucer’s Franklin and the Literary Vavasour.” The Chaucer Review 8 (1973): 33–59.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek. “The Squire as Story Teller.” The University of Toronto Quarterly 34 (1964): 82–92.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek.The Canterbury Tales. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek.The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Peterson, Joyce E. “The Finished Fragment: A Reassessment of the Squire’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 5 (1970): 62–74.Google Scholar
Phillips, Helen. An Introduction to the Canterbury Tales: Reading, Fiction, Context. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000.Google Scholar
Pratt, John H. Chaucer and War. Lanham: University Press of America, 2000.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas A. “Canon Formation.” In A Handbook of Middle English Studies, ed. Turner, Marion. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2013.Google Scholar
Radulescu, Raluca, and Truelove, Alison, eds. Gentry Culture in Late Medieval England. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Raybin, David. “‘Wommen, of Kynde, Desiren Libertee’: Rereading Dorigen, Rereading Marriage.” The Chaucer Review 27 (1992): 65–86.Google Scholar
Reale, Nancy M. “A Marchant Was Ther With a Forked Berd.” In Chaucer’s Pilgrims, ed. Lambdin and Lambdin.Google Scholar
Riddy, Felicity. “Engendering Pity in the Franklin’s Tale.” In Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature: The Wife of Bath and All Her Sect, ed. Johnson, Leslie and Evans, Ruth. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Rigby, Stephen H., ed., with the assistance of Alistair J. Minnis. Historians on Chaucer: The General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., Jr. “Chaucer’s Franklin and His Tale.” Costerus 1 (1974): 1–26.Google Scholar
Rossiter, William T. Chaucer and Petrarch. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Rossiter, William T.“Chaucer Joins the Schiera: The House of Fame, Italy and the Determination of Posterity.” In Chaucer and Fame: Reputation and Reception, ed. Davis, Isabel and Nall, Catherine. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2015.Google Scholar
Salisbury, John of. Ioannis Saresberiensis episcopi Carnotensis Policratici: sive, De nugis curialium et vestigiis philosophorum libri VIII, ed. Clemens, C. I. Webb. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Salter, Elizabeth. Chaucer: The Knight’s Tale and the Clerk’s Tale. London: Edward Arnold, 1962.Google Scholar
Saul, Nigel. “The Social Status of Chaucer’s Franklin: A Reconsideration.” Medium Ævum 52 (1983): 10–26.Google Scholar
Saul, Nigel.“Chaucer and Gentility.” In Chaucer’s England: Literature in Historical Context, ed. Hanawalt, Barbara A.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth. “The Deconstructure of the Canterbury Tales.” Journal x 4 (2000): 171–90.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth.Absent Narratives, Manuscript Textuality, and Literary Structure in Late Medieval England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth.“The Women in Chaucer’s ‘Marriage Group.’” Medieval Feminist Forum 45 (2009): 50–56.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth.Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Schleusener, Jay. “The Conduct of the Merchant’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 14 (1980): 237–50.Google Scholar
Schotland, Sara Deutch. “Avian Hybridity in ‘The Squire’s Tale’: Uses of Anthropomorphism.” In Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts, ed. Van Dyke.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Leah. “Redressing Griselda: Restoration through Translation in the Clerk’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 47 (2013): 274–99.Google Scholar
Scott, Kathleen L. “Past Ownership: Evidence of Book Ownership by English Merchants in the Later Middle Ages.” In Makers and Users of Medieval Books: Essays in Honour of A. S. G. Edwards, ed. Meale, Carol M. and Pearsall, Derek. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2014.Google Scholar
Seaman, David M. “‘The Wordes of the Frankeleyn to the Squier’: An Interruption?” English Language Notes 24 (1986): 12–18.Google Scholar
Seaman, David M.“‘As thynketh yow’: Conflicting Evidence and the Interpretation of The Franklin’s Tale.” Medievalia et Humanistica n. s. 17 (1991): 41–58.Google Scholar
Sembler, Elizabeth Mauer. “A Frankeleyn Was In His Compaignye.” In Chaucer’s Pilgrims, ed. Lambdin and Lambdin.Google Scholar
Severs, J. Burke. “Did Chaucer Rearrange the Clerk’s Envoy?” Modern Language Notes 69 (1954): 472–78.Google Scholar
Severs, J. Burke.The Literary Relationships of Chaucer’s Clerkes Tale. Hamden: Archon Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Shoaf, R. A. Dante, Chaucer, and the Currency of the Word: Money, Images, and Reference in Late Medieval Poetry. Norman: Pilgrim Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Shoaf, R. A.“The Franklin’s Tale: Chaucer and Medusa.” The Chaucer Review 21 (1986): 274–90.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. The Philosophy of Money. Trans. Tom Bottomore and David Frisby. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
Simpson, James. Reform and Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Hernstein. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Vance. Arts of Possession: The Middle English Household Imaginary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian. “A Southwark Tale: Gower, the 1381 Poll Tax, and Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales.” Speculum 92 (2017): 630–60.Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C. Textual Subjectivity: The Encoding of Subjectivity in Medieval Narratives and Lyrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C.Medieval Autographies: The “I” of the Text. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Specht, Henrik. Chaucer’s Franklin in the Canterbury Tales: The Social and Literary Background of a Chaucerian Character. Publications of the Department of English, University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1981.Google Scholar
Stelten, Leo F. Dictionary of Ecclesiastical Latin. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Stock, Lorraine Kochanske. “Foiled by Fowl: The Squire’s Peregrine Falcoln and the Franklin’s Dorigen.” In Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts, ed. Van Dyke.Google Scholar
Storm, Melvin. “Chaucer’s Franklin and Distraint of Knighthood.” The Chaucer Review 19 (1984): 162–68.Google Scholar
Straus, Barrie Ruth. “‘Truth’ and ‘Woman’ in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale.” Exemplaria 4 (1992): 135–68.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul. Social Chaucer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul.Chaucer’s Tale: 1386 and the Road to Canterbury. New York: Penguin, 2014.Google Scholar
Swanson, Heather. Medieval Artisans: An Urban Class in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Swanson, R. N. “Learnings and Livings: University Study and Clerical Careers in Late Medieval England.” History of the Universities 6 (1987): 81–103.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Michelle. Magic in Medieval Romance from Chrétien de Troyes to Geoffrey Chaucer. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tatlock, John S. P., and Kennedy, Arthur G.. A Concordance to the Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1963.Google Scholar
Taylor, Craig. “The Squire.” In Historians on Chaucer, ed. Rigby.Google Scholar
Taylor, Karla. “Chaucer’s Reticent Merchant.” In The Idea of Medieval Literature: New Essays on Chaucer and Medieval Culture in Honor of Donald R. Howard, ed. Dean, James M. and Zacher, Christian K.. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Thormann, Janet. “Networks of Exchange in The Franklin’s Tale.” Postmedieval: A Journal of Medieval Cultural Studies 3 (2012): 212–26.Google Scholar
Thrupp, Sylvia L. The Merchant Class of Medieval London. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter W. Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading The Nun’s Priest’s Tale. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Trigg, Stephanie. Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer from Medieval to Postmodern. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Turner, Joseph. “Speaking ‘Amys’ in the Franklin’s Tale: Rhetoric, Truth, and the Poetria nova.” The Chaucer Review 52 (2017): 217–36.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Carolynn, ed. Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Míċeál F. “Creating Comfortable Boundaries: Scribes, Editors, and the Invention of the Parson’s Tale.” In Rewriting Chaucer: Culture, Authority, and the Idea of the Authentic Text, 1400–1602, ed. Prendergast, Thomas A. and Kline, Barbara. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Wallace, David. Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wallace, David.“Chaucer’s Italian Inheritance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer, ed. Piero Boitani and Jill Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Warner, Lawrence. Chaucer’s Scribes: London Textual Production, 1384–1432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Warton, Thomas. The History of English Poetry, from the Close of the Eleventh to the Commencement of the Eighteenth Century. 4 vols. London: J. Dodsley, 1774.Google Scholar
Watts, William. “Verray Felicitee Parfit and the Development of Chaucer’s Philosophical Language.” The Chaucer Review 43 (2009): 260–81.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Bonnie. “Trouthe without Consequences: Rhetoric and Gender in the Franklin’s Tale.” In Feminea Medievalia I: Representations of the Feminine in the Middle Ages, ed. Wheeler, Bonnie. Cambridge: Academia Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Williams, Tara. “The Host, His Wife, and Their Communities in the Canterbury Tales.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 42 (2008): 383–408.Google Scholar
Williams, Tara.“Magic, Spectacle, and Morality in the Fourteenth Century.” New Medieval Literatures 12 (2010): 179–208.Google Scholar
Wood-Legh, K. L. Perpetual Chantries in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Wood, Chauncey. Chaucer and the Country of Stars: Poetic Uses of Astrological Imagery. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Wright, Edmond. “Faith and Narrative: A Reading of The Franklin’s Tale.” Partial Answers: Journal of the Literature and the History of Ideas 3 (2005): 19–42.Google Scholar
Wurtele, Douglas. “The Blasphemy of Chaucer’s Merchant.” Annuale Mediaevale 21 (1981): 91–110.Google Scholar
Zieman, Katherine. Singing the New Song: Literacy and Liturgy in Late Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Zieman, Katherine.“Escaping the Whirling Wicker: Ricardian Poetics and Narrative Voice in The Canterbury Tales.” In Answerable Style, ed. Grady and Galloway.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert J. Meyer-Lee, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert J. Meyer-Lee, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert J. Meyer-Lee, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
Available formats
×