Book contents
- Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
- Advances in Microscopy and Microanalysis
- Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Technique
- 1 Past, Present, and Future Electron Microscopy of Liquid Specimens
- 2 Encapsulated Liquid Cells for Transmission Electron Microscopy
- 3 Imaging Liquid Processes Using Open Cells in the TEM, SEM, and Beyond
- 4 Membrane-Based Environmental Cells for SEM in Liquids
- 5 Observations in Liquids Using an Inverted SEM
- 6 Temperature Control in Liquid Cells for TEM
- 7 Electron Beam Effects in Liquid Cell TEM and STEM
- 8 Resolution in Liquid Cell Experiments
- Part II Applications
- Part III Prospects
- Index
- References
5 - Observations in Liquids Using an Inverted SEM
from Part I - Technique
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
- Advances in Microscopy and Microanalysis
- Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Technique
- 1 Past, Present, and Future Electron Microscopy of Liquid Specimens
- 2 Encapsulated Liquid Cells for Transmission Electron Microscopy
- 3 Imaging Liquid Processes Using Open Cells in the TEM, SEM, and Beyond
- 4 Membrane-Based Environmental Cells for SEM in Liquids
- 5 Observations in Liquids Using an Inverted SEM
- 6 Temperature Control in Liquid Cells for TEM
- 7 Electron Beam Effects in Liquid Cell TEM and STEM
- 8 Resolution in Liquid Cell Experiments
- Part II Applications
- Part III Prospects
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy , pp. 106 - 126Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abrams, I. M. and McBrain, J. W., A closed cell for electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys., 15 (1944), 607–609.Google Scholar
Daulton, T. L., Little, B. J., Lowe, K. and Jones-Meehan, J., In situ environmental cell-transmission electron microscopy study of microbial reduction of chromium(VI) using electron energy loss spectroscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 7 (2001), 470–485.Google Scholar
de Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.Google Scholar
Thiberge, S., Zik, O. and Mosesa, E., An apparatus for imaging liquids, cells, and other wet samples in the scanning electron microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (2004), 2280–2289.Google Scholar
de Jonge, N., Peckys, D. B., Kremers, G. J., Piston, D. W., Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106 (2009), 2159–2164.Google Scholar
Thiberge, S., Nechushtan, A. and Sprinzak, D. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 3346–3351.Google Scholar
Ross, F. M., In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy, in Science of Microscopy, Ed. Hawkes, P. W. and Spence, J. C. H., pp. 445–534. (New York: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Nishiyama, H., Suga, M. and Ogura, T. et al., Atmospheric scanning electron microscope observes cells and tissues in open medium through silicon nitride film. J. Struct. Biol., 172 (2010), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishiyama, H., Koizumi, M., Ogawa, K. et al., Atmospheric scanning electron microscope system with an open sample chamber: configuration and applications. Ultramicroscopy, 147 (2014), 86–97.Google Scholar
Memtily, N., Okada, T., Ebihara, T. et al., Observation of tissues in open aqueous solution by atmospheric scanning electron microscopy: applicability to intraoperative cancer diagnosis. Int. J. Oncol., 46 (2015), 1872–1882Google Scholar
Sato, C., Manaka, S., Nakane, D. et al., Rapid imaging of mycoplasma in solution using atmospheric scanning electron microscopy (ASEM). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 417 (2012), 1213–1218.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Y., Ebihara, T., Nishiyama, H., Suga, M. and Sato, C., Immuno EM-OM correlative microscopy in solution by atmospheric scanning electron microscopy (ASEM). J. Struct. Biol., 180 (2012), 259–270.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, T., Mori, Y., Hirano, K. et al., Immuno-electron microscopy of primary cell cultures from genetically modified animals in liquid by atmospheric scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 469–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirano, K., Kinoshita, T., Uemura, T. et al., Electron microscopy of primary cell cultures in solution and correlative optical microscopy using ASEM. Ultramicroscopy, 143 (2014), 52–66.Google Scholar
Nyska, A., Cummings, C. A., Vainshtein, A. et al., Electron microscopy of wet tissues: a case study in renal pathology. Toxicol. Pathol., 32 (2004), 357–363.Google Scholar
Barshack, I., Polak-Charcon, S., Behar, V. et al., Wet SEM: a novel method for rapid diagnosis of brain tumors. Ultrastruct. Pathol., 28 (2004), 255–260.Google Scholar
Junt, T., Schulze, H., Chen, Z. et al., Dynamic visualization of thrombopoiesis within bone marrow. Science, 317 (2007), 1767–1770.Google Scholar
Suga, M., Nishiyama, H., Konyuba, Y. et al., The atmospheric scanning electron microscope with open sample space observes dynamic phenomena in liquid or gas. Ultramicroscopy, 111 (2011), 1650–1658.Google Scholar
Fukushima, K., Ishikawa, A. and Fukami, A., Injection of liquid into environmental cell for in situ observations. J. Electron Microsc., 34 (1985), 47–51.Google Scholar
Koopman, N., Application of ESEM to fluxless soldering. Microsc. Res. Tech., 25 (1993), 493–502.Google Scholar
Agronskaia, A. V., Valentijn, J. A., van Driel, L. F. et al., Integrated fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol., 164 (2008), 183–189.Google Scholar
Sartori, A., Gatz, R., Beck, F. et al., Correlative microscopy: bridging the gap between fluorescence light microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol., 160 (2007), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, M. J., Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Correlative fluorescence microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy of quantum-dot-labeled proteins in whole cells in liquid. ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 4110–4116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, R. D., Halsey, C. M., Spector, D. L. et al., A covalent fluorescent-gold immunoprobe: simultaneous detection of a pre-mRNA splicing factor by light and electron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 45 (1997), 947–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. M. and Vandre, D. D., Efficient immunocytochemical labeling of leukocyte microtubules with FluoroNanogold: an important tool for correlative microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 45 (1997), 631–642.Google Scholar
Giepmans, B. N., Deerinck, T. J., Smarr, B. L., Jones, Y. Z. and Ellisman, M. H., Correlated light and electron microscopic imaging of multiple endogenous proteins using quantum dots. Nat. Methods, 2 (2005), 743–749.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Nie, S., Next-generation quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol., 27 (2009) 732–733.Google Scholar
Gaietta, G., Deerinck, T. J., Adams, S. R. et al., Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. Science, 296 (2002), 503–507.Google Scholar
Nakane, D. and Miyata, M., Cytoskeletal “jellyfish” structure of Mycoplasma mobile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104 (2007), 19518–19523.Google Scholar
Nawa, Y., Inami, W., Miyake, A. et al., Dynamic autofluorescence imaging of intracellular components inside living cells using direct electron beam excitation. Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (2014), 378–386.Google Scholar
Glenn, D. R., Zhang, H., Kasthuri, N. et al., Correlative light and electron microscopy using cathodoluminescence from nanoparticles with distinguishable colours. Sci. Rep., 2 (2012), 865.Google Scholar
Inami, W., Nakajima, K., Miyakawa, A. and Kawata, Y., Electron beam excitation assisted optical microscope with ultra-high resolution. Opt. Express, 18 (2010), 12897–12902.Google Scholar
Swift, J. A. and Brown, A., An environmental cell for the examination of wet biological specimens at atmospheric pressure by transmission scanning electron microscopy. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 3 (1970), 924–926.Google Scholar
Grogan, J. M. and Bau, H. H., The Nanoaquarium: a platform for in situ transmission electron microscopy in liquid media. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 19 (2010), 885–894.Google Scholar
Liv, N., Zonnevylle, A. C., Narvaez, A. C. et al., Simultaneous correlative scanning electron and high-NA fluorescence microscopy. PLoS One, 8 (2013), e55707.Google Scholar
Green, E. D. and Kino, G. S., Atmospheric scanning electron-microscopy using silicon-nitride thin-film windows. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 9 (1991), 1557–1558.Google Scholar
Vidavsky, N., Addadi, S., Mahamid, J. et al., Initial stages of calcium uptake and mineral deposition in sea urchin embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111 (2014), 39–44.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K., Holtz, M. and Muller, D., AirSEM: electron microscopy in air, without a specimen chamber. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (Suppl. 2) (2013), 428–429.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K., Richmond-Decker, J. D., Holtz, M., Milstein, Y. and Muller, D. A., Spatial resolution of scanning electron microscopy without a vacuum chamber. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 26–27.Google Scholar
Ominami, Y., Kawanishi, S., Ushiki, T. and Ito, S., Observation of wet samples using a novel atmospheric scanning electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1154–1155.Google Scholar
Ominami, Y., Kawanishi, S., Ushiki, T. and Ito, S., A novel approach to scanning electron microscopy at ambient atmospheric pressure. Microscopy, 64 (2015), 97–104.Google Scholar