We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from SECTION IV - SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
The path from research to practice, or vice versa, is neither easy to find nor to follow. Having claimed at the outset that academics and practitioners rarely associate with each other, the output from the research that has been described in this book suggests that there is considerable potential for desirable outcomes if they did. Whilst it is relatively straightforward to identify the potential for practical impact from the SIRCA research projects, it is not so clear-cut when trying to isolate actual influences and even less so when trying to measure them. As a starting point it is probably useful to agree on a typology of research impacts and it is possible to represent them in Figure 15.1.
Academic impact is achieved by publishing papers in scientific journals and then having them cited by other researchers. The publication process ensures that a body of knowledge is created in a central repository; whilst citations are then attempts to build upon that body of knowledge. Knowledge is thus created incrementally, with existing knowledge subject to testing, validation, and criticism. Simultaneously, the centralised knowledge then becomes a source for the training and development of future scientists, who in turn add to the body of knowledge. Whilst this process theoretically exists as a means to continuous improvement, in practice the process often devolves to mere number-counting of publication and citations as indication of quality.
Publications and citations are counted, categorised, and ranked; the more a researcher receives, the better his/her prospects for promotion, tenure and continued employment in the long run, and in the short run, bonuses, grants, and titles are bequeathed on this basis. Increasingly, scientific journals are ranked according to their perceived prestige, and the higher the rank of journal, the more a paper published in it counts towards professional development. A report by a UK parliamentary select committee on peer review concluded, “Representatives of research institutions have suggested that publication in a high-impact journal is still an important consideration when assessing individuals for career progression,” (2011).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
