Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:39:06.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Particles in the Atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2023

Gary G. Gimmestad  and
David W. Roberts
Gary G. Gimmestad
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
David W. Roberts
Affiliation:
MicroDynamics LLC
Get access

Summary

The range of atmospheric scattering particle sizes is compared graphically with the range of wavelengths used in lidar to show that common particles are both much smaller and much larger than the wavelengths. Scattering must therefore be considered in all three regimes, so formulations and important results are described for Rayleigh, Mie, and geometric optics scattering. Aerosols in the troposphere and stratosphere are then described, with sources, sinks, and size ranges. The lidar ratio is defined. Other particle types are found in water and ice clouds, polar stratospheric clouds, and noctilucent clouds. Depolarization by nonspherical particles is described with Stokes vectors and Mueller matrices, and algorithms are given for finding the degree of depolarization from lidar measurement data. Particle classifiers are described, with examples, illustrating classification techniques using lidar ratios, depolarization ratios, and color ratios. The theory of sun photometry is then reviewed, and AERONET data products are described, with examples.

Keywords

atmospheric particlesoptical scatteringRayleigh scatteringMie scatteringaerosolslidar ratiocloudsdepolarizationclassifierssun photometers
Type
Chapter
Information
Lidar Engineering
Introduction to Basic Principles
 , pp. 65 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Measures, R. M., Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1984.Google Scholar
McCartney, E. J., Optics of the Atmosphere. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
Deirmendjian, D., Electromagnetic Scattering on Spherical Polydispersions. New York: American Elsevier, 1969.Google Scholar
Prahl, S., Oregon Medical Laser Center, Mie Scattering Calculator. [Online]. Available: https://omlc.org/calc/mie_calc.html. [Accessed 20 April 2021].Google Scholar
Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D., Eds., Light Scattering by Nonspherical Particles: Theory, Measurements, and Geophysical Applications. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stull, R. B., An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Netherlands: Springer, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creative Commons. [Online]. Available: http://CreativeCommons.org. [Accessed 27 September 2021].Google Scholar
Junge, C. E. and Manson, J. E., “Stratospheric aerosol studies,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 66, pp. 2163–2182, 1961.Google Scholar
Jäger, H. and Hofmann, D., “Midlatitude lidar backscatter to mass, area, and extinction conversion model based on in situ aerosol measurements from 1980 to 1987,” Applied Optics, vol. 30, pp. 127–138, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, H., “Long-term record of lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer at Garmisch-Partenkirchen,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 110, D08106 (9 pp.), 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrister, H. N., Roberts, D. W., Mercer, A. J., and Gimmestad, G. G., “Infrared lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosols,” Applied Optics, vol. 53, D40–D48, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veselovskii, I., Kolgotin, A., Griaznov, V. et al., “Inversion of multiwavelength Raman lidar data for retrieval of bimodal aerosol size distribution,” Applied Optics, vol. 43, pp. 1180–1195, 2004.Google Scholar
Koschmieder, H., “Measurements of Visibility at Danzig,” Monthly Weather Review, November 1930, pp. 439–444, 1930.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, G., Bissonnette, L. C., Bastille, C., and Valée, G., “Estimation of cloud droplet size density distribution from multiple-field-of-view lidar returns,” Optical Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 3404–3415, 1997.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. M., Serwazi, M., and von Zahn, U., “First detection of a noctilucent cloud by lidar,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 16, pp. 1445–1448, 1989.Google Scholar
Schäfer, B., Baumgarten, G. and Fiedler, J., “Small-scale structures in noctilucent clouds observed by lidar,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 208, 105384 (8 pp.), 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, E., Optics. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1990.Google Scholar
Collett, E., Field Guide to Polarization, J. E. Grievenkamp, Series Ed., Volume FG05. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mishchenko, M. I. and Hovenier, J. W., “Depolarization of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles,” Optics Letters, vol. 20, pp. 1356–1358, 1995.Google Scholar
Flynn, C. J., Mendoze, A., Zheng, Y., and Mathur, S., “Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique,” Optics Express, vol. 15, pp. 2785–2790, 2007.Google Scholar
Gimmestad, G. G., “Reexamination of depolarization in lidar measurements,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, pp. 3795–3802, 2008.Google Scholar
Roy, G., Cao, X., and Bernier, R., “On the information content of linear and circular depolarization signatures of bioaerosols,” In Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XII, Proceedings of SPIE, 2011, vol. 8018, 8 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthaler, V., “About the effects of polarising optics on lidar signals and the Δ90-calibration,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 9, pp. 4181–4255, 2016.Google Scholar
Miffre, A., Mehri, T., Francis, M. and Rairoux, P., “UV-VIS depolarization from Arizona Test Dust particles at exact backscattering angle,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 169, pp. 79–90, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, O. B., Tabazadeh, A., Browell, E. V., and Jordan, J., “Analysis of lidar observations of Arctic polar stratospheric clouds during January 1989,” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 105, pp. 20589–20616, 2000.Google Scholar
Browell, E. V., Butler, C. F., Ismail, S. et al., “Airborne lidar observations in the wintertime arctic stratosphere: polar stratospheric clouds,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 17, March Supplement, pp. 385–388, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, M. and Omar, A. H., “Polar Stratospheric Cloud (PSC) classification using LIDAR measurements from the recent SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE),” In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002, pp. 2407–2410.Google Scholar
Groß, S., Esselborn, M., Weinzierl, B. et al., “Aerosol classification by airborne high spectral resolution lidar observations,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 13, pp. 2487–2505, 2013.Google Scholar
Kim, M. H., Omar, A. H., Tackett, J. L. et al., “The CALIPSO version 4 automated aerosol classification and lidar ratio selection algorithm,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 11, pp. 6107–6135, 2018.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Kar, J., Zeng, S. et al., “Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version 4.1 data products,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 12, pp. 703–734, 2019.Google Scholar
Mims, F. M., “Solar radiometer with light-emitting diodes as spectrally-selective detectors,” Applied Optics, vol. 39, pp. 6517–6518, 2000.Google Scholar
Young, A. T., “Air mass and refraction,” Applied Optics, vol. 33, pp. 1108–1110, 1994.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. E., “Sun photometry,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 64, pp. 4–10, 1983.Google Scholar
Morys, M., Mims, F. M., Hagerup, S. et al., “Design, calibration, and performance of MICROTOPS II handheld ozone monitor and Sun photometer,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 106, pp. 14573–14582, 2001.Google Scholar
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I. et al., “AERONET – A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 66, pp. 1–16, 1998.Google Scholar
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, AERONET Data Synergy Tool. [Online]. Available: http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/bamgomas_interactive. [Accessed: 20 April 2021].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×