Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:30:42.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Phenomenology, Biological Psychology, and the Mind–Body Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Edited by
Kenneth S. Kendler ,
Josef Parnas  and
Peter Zachar
Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 125 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Gallagher, S. (2005) How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2017) Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. (2010) The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Albahari, M. (2016) Analytical Buddhism: The Two-Tiered Illusion of Self. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. (1999) ‘Toward a phenomenology of racial embodiment. Radical Philosophy 95: 15–26.Google Scholar
Babinski, J. (1899) ‘De l’asynergie cérébelleuse.’ Revue de Neurologie 7: 806–816.Google Scholar
Baker, D., Hunter, E., Lawrence, E., Medford, N., Patel, M., Senior, C., Sierra, M., Lambert, M. V., Phillips, M. L., and David, A. S. (2003) ‘Depersonalisation disorder: Clinical features of 204 cases.’ The British Journal of Psychiatry 182(5): 428–433.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2011) ‘Bodily awareness and self-consciousness.’ In Gallagher, S. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Self (pp. 157–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2015) ‘Bodily ownership, bodily awareness and knowledge without observation.’ Analysis 75(1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2017) ‘Ownership and the space of the body.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 117–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A. J., and Eilan, N. (Eds.) (1995) ‘Introduction.’ In The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Berthoz, A. (2000) The Brain’s Sense of Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Billon, A. (2013) ‘Does consciousness entail subjectivity? The puzzle of thought insertion.’ Philosophical Psychology 26(2): 291–314.Google Scholar
Billon, A. (2017) ‘Mineness first: Three challenges to the recent theories of the sense of bodily ownership.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 189–216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Billon, A. and Kriegel, U. (2014) ‘Jaspers’ dilemma: The psychopathological challenge to subjectivity theories of consciousness.’ In Gennaro, R. (Ed.), Disturbed Consciousness (pp. 29–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, L. and Broome, M. (2009) ‘A role for ownership and authorship in the analysis of thought insertion.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sorös, P., Müller, H. H. O., and Philipsen, A. (2018) ‘The senses of agency and ownership: A review.’ Frontiers in Psychology 9: 535.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1988) ‘Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory.’ Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1989) ‘Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: A feminist critique of Merleau-Ponty’s. Phenomenology of Perception.’ In Allen, J. and Young, I. M. (Eds.), The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy (pp. 85–100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. and Hopkins, B. (1988) ‘Hand-mouth coordination in the newborn baby.’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6: 303–314.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1999) ‘Schizophrenia, the space of reasons and thinking as a motor process.’ The Monist 82(4): 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (2002) ‘The ownership of thoughts.’ Philosophy Psychology and Psychiatry 9(1): 35–39.Google Scholar
Dainton, B. (2008) The Phenomenal Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Vignemont, F. (2007) ‘Habeas corpus: The sense of ownership of one’s own body.’ Mind & Language 22(4): 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vignemont, F. (2017) ‘An agentive conception of the sense of bodily ownership: The bodyguard hypothesis.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 217–236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dokic, J. (2003) ‘The sense of ownership: An analogy between sensation and action.’ In Roessler, J. (Ed.), Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 321–344). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (2007) ‘The return of the myth of the mental.’ Inquiry 50(4): 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugas, L. and Moutier, F. (1911) La depersonalization. Paris: Felix Alcon.Google Scholar
Enticott, P. G, Kennedy, H. A., Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B. J., Daskalakis, Z. J., and Fitzgerald, P. B. (2013) ‘Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence against a global ëmirror systemí deficit.’ Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. (1982) Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (2008) Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Philcox, R.. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2011) ‘What is optimal about motor control?’ Neuron 72(3): 488–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D. (1992) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. and Done, D. J. (1988) ‘Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia.’ British Journal of Psychiatry 153: 437–443.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. and Gallagher, S. (2002) ‘Models of the pathological mind: An interview with Christopher Frith.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(4): 57–80.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (1996) ‘The moral significance of primitive self-consciousness.’ Ethics 107(1): 129–140.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000) ‘Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 14–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2004) ‘Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: A neurophenomenological critique.’ Psychopathology 37: 8–19.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2005) How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2011) ‘Time in action.’ In Callender, C. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook on Time (pp. 419–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2012) ‘Multiple aspects in the sense of agency.’ New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2013) ‘Ambiguity in the sense of agency.’ In Clark, A., Kiverstein, J., and Vierkant, T. (Eds.), Decomposing the Will (pp. 118–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Cole, J. (1995) ‘Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject.’ Journal of Mind and Behavior 16: 369–390.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Marcel, A. (1999) ‘The self in contextualized action.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Varela, F. (2003) ‘Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary Volume 29: 93–132.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2012) The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2014) ‘Phenomenological approaches to self-consciousness.’ In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/.Google Scholar
Georgieff, N. and Jeannerod, M. (1998) ‘Beyond consciousness of external events: A ‘who’ system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness.’ Consciousness and Cognition 7: 465–477.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. and Scheerer, M. (1964) Abstract and Concrete Behavior: An Experimental Study with Special Tests. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Reprint of Psychological Monographs 53(2), 1941.Google Scholar
Guillot, M. (2017) ‘I me mine: On a confusion concerning the subjective character of experience.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8(1): 23–53.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. and Eimer, M. (1999) ‘On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements.’ Experimental Brain Research 126: 128–133.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M. (1993) ‘Future-oriented processes in infancy: The case of visual expectations.’ In Granrud, C. (Ed.), Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy (pp. 235–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Happé, F. and Frith, U. (2006) ‘The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders.’ Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Head, H. (1920) Studies in Neurology. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hesnard, A. (1909) Les troubles de la personnalité dans les états d’asthénie psychique. Paris: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2007) ‘The sense of self in the phenomenology of agency and perception.’ Psyche 13: 1–20.Google Scholar
Hohwy, J., Paton, B., and Palmer, C. (2016) ‘Distrusting the present.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(3): 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, R. J. and Thompson, B. (2017) ‘Phenomenally mine: In search of the subjective character of consciousness.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8(1): 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1991) On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Collected Works IV. Trans. Brough, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Translation of (1966) Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins (1893–1917). Husserliana 10. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutto, D. D. and Ilundáin-Agurruza, J. (2018) ‘Selfless activity and experience: Radicalizing minimal self-awareness.’ Topoi 1–12.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2001) ‘Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition.’ Neuroimage 14: S103–S109.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2003) ‘Self-generated actions.’ In Maasen, S., Prinz, W., and Roth, G. (Eds.), Voluntary Action: Brains, Minds, and Sociality (pp. 153–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. and Gallagher, S. (2002) ‘From action to interaction.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Leder, D. (1990) The Absent Body. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Leroy, E.-B. (1901) ‘Sur l’illusion dite dépersonalization.’ L’Année Psychologique 8(1): 519–522.Google Scholar
Lew, A. and Butterworth, G. E. (1995) ‘Hand-mouth contact in newborn babies before and after feeding.’ Developmental Psychology 31: 456–463.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. (1966) ‘Cerebral organization and the conscious control of action.’ In Eccles, J. C. (Ed.), Brain and Conscious Experience (pp. 422–445). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013) How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. (1995) ‘Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership.’ In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, T., and Eilan, N. (Eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1935) ‘On depersonalization.’ British Journal of Medical Psychology 15(2): 103–126.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Landes, D. A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, J. W. (2016) ‘What is the sense of agency and why does it matter?’ Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1272.Google Scholar
Olivardia, R., Pope, H. G. Jr, III Borowiecki, J. J., and Cohane, G. H. (2004) ‘Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression, and eating disorder symptoms.’ Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5(2): 112.Google Scholar
Pacherie, E. (2007) ‘The sense of control and the sense of agency.’ Psyche 13(1), http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/.Google Scholar
Rinehart, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Iansek, R., Enticott, P. G., and Johnson, K. A. (2006) ‘Movement-related potentials in high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder.’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 48(4): 272–277.Google Scholar
Schear, J. C. (2009) ‘Experience and self-consciousness.’ Philosophical Studies 144: 95–105.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. and Chabris, C. F. (1999) ‘Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.’ Perception 28(9): 1059–1074.Google Scholar
Stephens, G. L. and Graham, G. (2000) When Self-Consciousness Breaks: Alien Voices and Inserted Thoughts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., and Newen, A. (2008) ‘Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency.’ Consciousness and Cognition 17(1): 219–239.Google Scholar
Vosgerau, G. and Newen, A.. (2007) ‘Thoughts, motor actions, and the self.’ Mind & Language 22(1): 22–43.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. (2015) ‘The normal, the natural, and the normative: A Merleau-Pontian legacy to feminist theory, critical race theory, and disability studies.’ Continental Philosophy Review 48: 77–93.Google Scholar
Wieseler, C. M. (2016). ‘A Feminist Contestation of Ableist Assumptions: Implications for Biomedical Ethics, Disability Theory, and Phenomenology.’ Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of South Florida. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6433Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995) ‘An internal model for sensorimotor integration.’ Science 269: 1880–1882.Google Scholar
Yancy, G. (2014) ‘White gazes: What it feels like to be en Essence.’ In Lee, E. S. (Ed.), Living Alterities: Phenomenology, Embodiment, and Race (pp. 43–64). Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (2006) ‘Lived body vs. gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity.’ In “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays (pp. 12–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018) ‘Consciousness, self-consciousness, selfhood: A reply to some critics.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9(3): 703–718.Google Scholar

References

Husserl, E.G.A. (1954/1970) The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Translated by Carr, D.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
van Dyck, M. (2006) An Archaeology of Galileo’s Science of Motion. PhD thesis. University of Gent.Google Scholar

References

Bleuler, E. (1950) Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias (J. Zinkin, trans.). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology (7th ed., J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton, trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

References

Bortolotti, L. (2016) ‘Epistemic Benefits of Elaborated and Systematized Delusions in Schizophrenia.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 879–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collingwood, R. G. (1959) ‘History as Re-enactment of the Past Experience.’ In Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History: Readings from Classical and Contemporary Sources. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 251–262.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. D., Young, A. W., Quayle, A. H., and De Pauw, K. W. (1997) ‘Reduced Autonomic Responses to Faces in Capgras Delusion.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B – Biological Sciences, 264, 1085–1092.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1987) Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frith, C. (1992) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (1986) ‘Folk Psychology as Simulation.’ Mind and Language, 1, 158–171.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1990) ‘“Meaning” Connections and Causal Connections in the Human Sciences: The Poverty of Hermeneutic Philosophy.’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 559–577.Google Scholar
Hoerl, C. (2013) ‘Jaspers on Explaining and Understanding in Psychiatry.’ In Stanghellini, Giovanni and Fuchs, Thomas (eds.), One Century of Karl Jaspers’ General Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1913/1959) General Psychopathology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. and Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using Neuroscience to Help Understand Fear and Anxiety: A Two-System Framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Mishara, A. L. and Corlett, P. (2009) ‘Are Delusions Biologically Adaptive? Salvaging the Doxastic Shear Pin.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 530–531.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. (1992) ‘The Origins of Delusion.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 298–308.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1948) Human Knowledge. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

References

Egan, G. (1986) The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gorski, M. (2015) Karl Jaspers (1883–1969). In Cautin, R. L. & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 1583–1589). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1923/1963). General psychopathology (J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton, trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Campbell, J. (2014) ‘Expanding the domain of the understandable in psychiatric illness: An updating of the Jasperian framework of explanation and understanding.’ Psychological Medicine, 44, 1–7.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Martin, D. G. (1983) Counseling and therapy skills. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Caplan, P. J. (1995) They say you’re crazy: How the world’s most powerful psychiatrists decide who’s normal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2013) ‘A pattern theory of self.’ Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 443–443.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003) ‘The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2011) ‘Diagnosis of mental disorders in light of modern genetics.’ In Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (Eds.), The conceptual evolution of DSM-5 (pp. 3–17). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Insel, T. (2013) ‘Director’s blog: Transforming diagnosis.’ Retrieved from www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Kernberg, O. F. (1975) Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Kotov, R., Watson, D., Forbes, M. K., Eaton, N. R., Ruggero, C. J., …, Zimmermann, J. (2018) ‘Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology.’ World Psychiatry, 17(3), 282–293.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J. (2012) ‘Tradition versus empiricism in the current DSM-5 proposal for revising the classification of personality disorders.’ Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 22, 81–91.Google Scholar
Markon, K. E. (2013) ‘Epistemological pluralism and scientific development: An argument against authoritative nosologies.’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(5), 554–579.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N. C. (2007) “DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1950) Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (trans. J. Zinkin). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, K. (1959) Die Beginnende Schizophrenie. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
Deutsch, H. (1942) “Some forms of emotional disturbance and their relationship to schizophrenia.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 11(3), 301–321.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1956) “The problem of ego identity.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4(1), 56–121.Google Scholar
Ey, H. (1973) Traité des Hallucinations. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2018) The ecology of the brain: The phenomenology and biology of the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2001) “Melancholia as a desynchronization: Towards a psychopathology of interpersonal time.” Psychopathology, 34(4), 179–186.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2013) “Temporality and psychopathology.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 75–104.Google Scholar
Ghaemi, N. S. (2009) The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model: Reconciling art and science in psychiatry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gruhle, H. W. (1929) Psychologie der Schizophrenie. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (2009) Who one is. Meontology of the “I”: A transcendental phenomenology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1950) “Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego.” The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 5(1), 74–96.Google Scholar
Haug, E., Lien, L., Raballo, A., Bratlien, U., Øie, M., Andreassen, O. A., … Møller, P. (2012) “Selective aggregation of self-disorders in first-treatment DSM-IV schizophrenia spectrum disorders.” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(7), 632–636.Google Scholar
Hoch, P. H., & Cattell, J. P. (1959) “The diagnosis of pseudoneurotic schizophrenia.” Psychiatric Quarterly, 33(1), 17–43.Google Scholar
Hoch, P., & Polatin, P. (1949) “Pseudoneurotic forms of schizophrenia.” Psychiatric Quarterly, 23(2), 248–276.Google Scholar
Jablensky, A. (2018) “The dialectic of quantity and quality in psychopathology.” World Psychiatry, 17(3), 300–301.Google Scholar
Jacobson, E. (1964) The self and the object world. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1997) General psychopathology (trans. J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton). London: John Hopkins.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2018) “Classification of psychopathology: Conceptual and historical background.” World Psychiatry, 17(3), 241–242.Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. F. (1985) Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. (1967) “Borderline personality organization.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15(3), 641–685.Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. F. (2016) “What is personality?” Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(2), 145–156.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1946) “Notes on some schizoid mechanisms.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27, 99–110.Google Scholar
Kohut, H. (1977) The restoration of the self. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koren, D. (in press) “Basic self-disturbance in adolescence predicts schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in young adulthood: A 7-year follow-up study among non-psychotic treatment-seeking adolescents.” Schizophrenia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.022Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1899) Psychiatrie: Ein Lehrbuch für Studirende und Aerzte, 6. Auflage. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Krauss, A. (1999) “The significance of intuition for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.” In Maj, M. & Sartorius, N. (Eds.), Schizophrenia (pp. 47–49). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Kotov, R., Watson, D., Forbes, M. K., Eaton, N. R., Ruggero, C. J., … Bagby, R. M. (2018) “Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology.” World Psychiatry, 17(3), 282–293.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1960) The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mahler, M. S. (1971) “A study of the separation-individuation process: And its possible application to borderline phenomena in the psychoanalytic situation.” The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26(1), 403–424.Google Scholar
Marcia, J. E. (2006) “Ego identity and personality disorders.” Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(6), 577–596.Google Scholar
Motobayashi, Y., Parnas, J., Motobayashi, Y., Kimura, B., & Toda, D. L. (2016) “The ‘schizophrenic’ in the self-consciousness of schizophrenic patients”, by Mari Nagai (1990). History of Psychiatry, 27(4), 493–503.Google Scholar
Møller, P., & Husby, R. (2000) “The initial prodrome in schizophrenia: Searching for naturalistic core dimensions of experience and behavior.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 217–232.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., Lavoie, S., Gaweda, L., Li, E., Sass, L. A., Koren, D., … Allott, K. (2019) “Testing a neurophenomenological model of basic self disturbance in early psychosis.” World Psychiatry, 18(1), 104–105.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., Thompson, A., & Yung, A. R. (2012) “Basic self-disturbance predicts psychosis onset in the ultra high risk for psychosis ‘prodromal’ population.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(6), 1277–1287.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., Arnfred, S., Carlsson, J., Nylander, L., Pedersen, L., Mortensen, E. L., Handest, P. (2019) “Self-disorders in Asperger syndrome compared to schizotypal disorder: A clinical study.” Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz036Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Handest, P., Vollmer-Larsen, A., Sæbye, D., Pedersen, J. T., & Parnas, J. (2017) “Temporal persistence of anomalous self-experience: A 5 years follow-up.” Schizophrenia Research, 179, 36–40.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Jessen, K., Sæbye, D., & Parnas, J. (2016) “Variability in clinical diagnoses during the ICD-8 and ICD-10 era.” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(9), 1293–1299.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Nilsson, L. S., Sæbye, D., & Parnas, J. (2018) “Self-disorders in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: A 5-year follow-up study.” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 268(7), 713–718.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2014) “Self-disorders and the schizophrenia spectrum: A study of 100 first hospital admissions.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(6), 1300–1307.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2013) “The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure, and subjectivity.” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263, 353–364.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2004) “Belief and pathology of self-awareness a phenomenological contribution to the classification of delusions.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(10–11), 148–161.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2011) “A disappearing heritage: The clinical core of schizophrenia.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(6), 1121–1130.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2012) “DSM-IV and the founding prototype of schizophrenia: Are we regressing to a pre-Kraepelinian nosology?” In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry II: Nosology (pp. 237–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015) “Psychiatry made easy: Operation(al)ism and some of its consequences.” In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry III: The nature and sources of historical change (pp. 190–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Bovet, P., & Innocenti, G. M. (1996) “Schizophrenic trait features, binding, and cortico-cortical connectivity: A neurodevelopmental pathogenetic hypothesis.” Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 4(4), 185–196.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Handest, P., Jansson, L., & Sæbye, D. (2005) “Anomalous subjective experience among first-admitted schizophrenia spectrum patients: Empirical investigation.” Psychopathology, 38(5), 259–267.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Handest, P., Sæbye, D., & Jansson, L. (2003) “Anomalies of subjective experience in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar illness.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(2), 126–133.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2016) “Mysticism and schizophrenia: A phenomenological exploration of the structure of consciousness in the schizophrenia spectrum disorders.” Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 75–88.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Jansson, L., Sass, L. A., & Handest, P. (1998) “Self-experience in the prodromal phases of schizophrenia: A pilot study of first-admissions.” Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research, 6(2), 97–106.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005) “EASE: Examination of anomalous self-experience.” Psychopathology, 38(5), 236–258.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Raballo, A., Handest, P., Jansson, L., Vollmer-Larsen, A., & Sæbye, D. (2011) “Self‐experience in the early phases of schizophrenia: Five‐year follow‐up of the Copenhagen Prodromal Study.” World Psychiatry, 10(3), 200–204.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Sass, L. A. (2008) “Varieties of ‘phenomenology’: On description, understanding, and explanation in psychiatry.” In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology (pp. 239–278). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013) “Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Urfer-Parnas, A. (2017) “The ontology and epistemology of symptoms: The case of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.” In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry IV: Classification of psychiatric illness (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pick, A. (1903) “Zur Pathologie des Ich-Bewusstseins.” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 38(1), 22–33.Google Scholar
Raballo, A., Pappagallo, E., Dell’Erba, A., Lo Cascio, N., Patane’, M., Gebhardt, E., … & Girardi, P. (2016) “Self-disorders and clinical high risk for psychosis: An empirical study in help-seeking youth attending community mental health facilities.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(4), 926–932.Google Scholar
Raballo, A., & Parnas, J. (2012) “Examination of anomalous self-experience: Initial study of the structure of self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum.” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(7), 577–583.Google Scholar
Raballo, A., & Parnas, J. (2010) “The silent side of the spectrum: Schizotypy and the schizotaxic self.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(5), 1017–1026.Google Scholar
Raballo, A., Sæbye, D., & Parnas, J. (2009) “Looking at the schizophrenia spectrum through the prism of self-disorders: An empirical study.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(2), 344–351.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A. R., Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2019) “Schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An empirical study.” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-01022-zGoogle Scholar
Roy, J-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999) “Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology.” In Roy, J-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B., & Varela, F. J. (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 1–80). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1992) Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rümke, H. C. (1958) “Die klinische Differenzierung innerhalb der Gruppe der Schizophrenien.” Der Nervenarzt, 29, 40–53.Google Scholar
Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003) “Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(3), 427–444.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1950) Klinische Psychopathologie (3. Vermehrte Auflage der Beiträge zur Psychiatrie ed.). Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
Stephensen, H., & Parnas, J. (2018) “What can self-disorders in schizophrenia tell us about the nature of subjectivity? A psychopathological investigation.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 629–642.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1985) The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (1974) Glossary of mental disorders and guide to their classification: For use in conjunction with the International Classification of Diseases, 8th Revision. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1965) The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Wyrsch, J. (1946) “Über die Intuition bei der Erkennung der Schizophrenen.” Schweizerische Med Wochenschrift, 46, 1173–1176.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018a) “Consciousness, self-consciousness, selfhood: A reply to some critics.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 703–718.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018b) Phenomenology: The basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2019) “A recurrent question: What is borderline?” Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(3), 341–369.Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019a) “Borderline personality disorder or a disorder within the schizophrenia spectrum? A psychopathological study.” World Psychiatry, 18(1), 109–110.Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019b) “Identity disturbance, feelings of emptiness, and the boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(1), 106–113.Google Scholar

References

Cermolacce, M., Naudin, J., & Parnas, J. (2007) “The ‘minimal self’ in psychopathology: Re-examining the self-disorders in the schizophrenia spectrum.” Consciousness and Cognition, 16(3), 703–714.Google Scholar
Frith, C. (1992) The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Frith, C., & Gallagher, S. (2002) “Models of the pathological mind.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(4), 57–80.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000) “Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2013) “A pattern theory of self.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (443), 1–7.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2018) “The therapeutic reconstruction of affordances.” Res Philosophica 95(4), 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Daly, A. (2018) “Dynamical relations in the self-pattern.” Frontiers in Psychology 9, 664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G. (2007) “Psychopathology and pathophysiology of the self in depression – Neuropsychiatric hypothesis.” Journal of Affective Disorders 104(1–3), 1–14.Google Scholar
Northoff, G. (2014) “How is our self altered in psychiatric disorders? A neurophenomenal approach to psychopathological symptoms.” Psychopathology 47(6), 365–376.Google Scholar
Picard, F., & Friston, K. (2014) “Predictions, perception, and a sense of self.” Neurology 83(12), 1112–1118.Google Scholar

References

Hafner, H. (2015) “Descriptive psychopathology, phenomenology, and the legacy of Karl Jaspers.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17, 19–29.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, M. E., Yee, C. M., Heller, W., Miller, G. A., & Spielberg, J. M. (2019) “Reconfiguration of brain networks supporting inhibition of emotional challenge.” NeuroImage, 186, 350–357.Google Scholar
Bates, T. C., Lewis, G. J., & Weiss, A. (2013) “Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects of adult intelligence.” Psychological Science, 24, 2111–2116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchaine, T. P., & Klein, D. N. (2017) “Developmental psychopathology and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.” In Beauchaine, T. P. & Hinshaw, S. P. (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 33–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2007) “Reducing psychology while maintaining its autonomy via mechanistic explanations.” In Schouton, M. & de Jong, H. L. (Eds.), The matter of mind: Philosophical essays of psychology, neuroscience, and reduction (pp. 172–198). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2017). “Explicating top-down causation using networks and dynamics.” Philosophy of Science, 84(2), 253–274.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2008) “From reduction back to higher levels.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 559–564). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Berenbaum, H. (2013) “Classification and psychopathology research.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 894–901.Google Scholar
Bolton, D. (2013). “Should mental disorders be regarded as brain disorders? 21st century mental health sciences and implications for research and training.” World Psychiatry, 12(1), 24.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. (2013) “Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., & Kalis, A. (2019) “Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(e2), 1–63.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Schmittmann, V. D., Epskamp, S., & Waldorp, L. J. (2011) “The small world of psychopathology.” PLoS ONE 6, e27407.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Van der Maas, H. L. J., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016) “Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs.” Psychological Medicine, 46, 1567–1579.Google Scholar
Brennand, K. J., Simone, A., Jou, J., Gelboin-Burkhart, C., Tran, N., Sangar, S., … McCarthy, S. (2011) “Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells.” Nature, 473(7346), 221–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BBRF/Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. (2018, April) “What’s new with TMS for depression and other brain diseases.” https://us3.campaign-archive.com/?u=c6e89b4de3dfd70e795490632&id=7b7ae091ba&e=1a018af71d, accessed 04/05/18.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. T. Jr, & Davis, J. M. (2012) “Another view of the history of antipsychotic drug discovery and development.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1168.Google Scholar
Casey, B. J., Oliveri, M. E., & Insel, T. (2014) “A neurodevelopmental perspective on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework.” Biological Psychiatry, 76, 350–353.Google Scholar
Clayson, P. E., & Miller, G. A. (2017) “Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting.” International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111, 57–67.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007) “Top-down causation without top-down causes.” Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N. (2015). “Research Domain Criteria: Toward future psychiatric nosologies.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(1), 89.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2010) “Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria project.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1061–1062.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013) “Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC.” BMC Medicine, 11, 126.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013) “Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937.Google Scholar
Davis, J. M. (1976) “Recent developments in the drug treatment of schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 208–214.Google Scholar
Engstrom, E. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2015) “Emil Kraepelin: Icon and reality.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1190–1196.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M., Redish, A. D., Oquendo, M. A., Averbeck, B. B., Kinnane, M. E., & Gordon, J. A. (2018) “Computational psychiatry: A report from the 2017 NIMH workshop on opportunities and challenges.” Molecular Psychiatry, 24(4):479–483.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1968) Psychological explanation. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2014) “RDoC is necessary, but very oversold.” World Psychiatry, 13, 47–49.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. C., Jamieson, J. P., Glenn, C. R., & Nock, M. K. (2015) “How developmental psychopathology theory and research can inform the research domain criteria (RDoC) project.” Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 280–290.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) “Computational psychiatry: The brain as a phantastic organ.” The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 148–158.Google Scholar
George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., Avery, D., McDonald, W. M., Durkalski, V., Pavlicova, M., … Holtzheimer, P. E. (2010) “Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: A sham-controlled randomized trial.” Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 507–516.Google Scholar
Golden, R. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1979) “Detection of the schizoid taxon with MMPI indicators.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 217–233.Google Scholar
Goldfried, M. R. (2016). “On possible consequences of National Institute of Mental Health funding for psychotherapy research and training.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 77.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. A. (2018) “Towards a genomic psychiatry: Recommendations of the Genomics Workgroup of the NAMHC.” Director’s Messages published online March 29, 2018. www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/messages/2018/towards-a-genomic-psychiatry-recommendations-of-the-genomics-workgroup-of-the-namhc.shtml, accessed 01/06/18.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. A. (2019) “From neurobiology to novel medications: A principled approach to translation.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 425–227.Google Scholar
Griesinger, W. (1854) Die Pathologie und Therapie der psychischen Krankheiten. Stuttgart: Krabbe.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, V. G. (1996) How to build a theory in cognitive science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (1998). “NIMH during the tenure of Director Steven E. Hyman, MD: The now and future of NIMH.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(Suppl.), 36–40.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2005). “Addiction: A disease of learning and memory.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1414–1422.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2010) “The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2012) “Revolution stalled.” Science Translational Medicine, 4, 155cm11.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2010, April) “Faulty circuits.” Scientific American, 302(4), 44–51.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2009) “Endophenotypes: Bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity.” Biological Psychiatry, 66, 988–989.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., Cuthbert, B. N., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., … Wang, P. S. (2010) “Research domain criteria: Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.Google Scholar
Kandel, E., & Squire, L. (1992) “Cognitive neuroscience: Editorial overview.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2, 143–145.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2005) “‘A gene for…’: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1243–1252.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2008) “Explanatory models for psychiatric illness.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 695–702.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2012a) “The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: Replacing the organic functional/hardware-software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 377–388.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2012b) “Levels of explanation in psychiatric and substance use disorders: Implications for the development of an etiologically based nosology.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 11–21.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Campbell, J. (2009) “Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind–body problem.” Psychological Medicine, 39, 881–887.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Zachar, P., & Craver, C. (2011) “What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders?” Psychological Medicine, 41, 1143–1150.Google Scholar
Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016) “The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics.” Psychophysiology, 53, 286–297.Google Scholar
Kozak, M. J., & Miller, G. A. (1982). “Hypothetical constructs versus intervening variables: A re-appraisal of the three-systems model of anxiety assessment.” Behavioral Assessment, 14, 347–358.Google Scholar
Lake, J. I., Yee, C. M., & Miller, G. A. (2017) “Misunderstanding RDoC. Mechanisms of mental disorders special issue,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 170–174.Google Scholar
Laruelle, M. (2013) “The second revision of the dopamine theory of schizophrenia: Implications for treatment and drug development.” Biological Psychiatry, 74, 80–81.Google Scholar
Leshner, A. I. (1997). “Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters.” Science, 278, 45–47.Google Scholar
Leshner, A. I. (2007) “Behavioral science comes of age.” Science, 316, 953.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007) “Cognitive neuroscience and depression: Legitimate versus illegitimate reductionism and five challenges.” Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 263–272.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) “The research domain criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 129–139.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Treadway, M. T. (2016) “Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 435–463.Google Scholar
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). “On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.” Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Maj, M. (2013) “Mental disorders as ‘brain disorders’ and Jaspers’ legacy.” World Psychiatry, 12, 1–3.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1996). “Presidential address: How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology.” Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Clayson, P. E., & Yee, C. M. (2014) “Hunting genes, hunting endophenotypes.” Psychophysiology, 51, 1329–1330.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) “Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Kozak, M. J. (1993) “A philosophy for the study of emotion: Three-systems theory.” In Birbaumer, N. & Öhman, A. (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Physiological, cognitive and clinical aspects (pp. 31–47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Rockstroh, B. S., Hamilton, H. K., & Yee, C. M. (2016) “Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC.” Psychophysiology, 53, 410–414.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Yee, C. M. (2015) “Moving psychopathology forward.” Psychological Inquiry, 26, 263–267.Google Scholar
Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Dayan, P. (2012) “Computational psychiatry.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 72–80.Google Scholar
Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012) “Research domain criteria: Cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior.” Dialogues Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 29–37.Google Scholar
National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Genomics. (2018) “Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges of Psychiatric Genetics Research Recommendations Summary.” [Internet]. National Institute of Mental Health. Available from: www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/namhc-genomics-workgroup-research-recommendations-summary.shtml, accessed 29/06/19.Google Scholar
Perera, T., George, M. S., Grammer, G., Janicak, P. G., Pascual-Leone, A., & Wirecki, T S. (2016) “The Clinical TMS Society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder.” Brain Stimulation, 9, 336–346.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. R. (2014) “Will RDoC hasten the decline of America’s global leadership role in mental health?” World Psychiatry, 13, 40–41.Google Scholar
Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. (2011) “Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches.” Synthese, 183, 283–311.Google Scholar
Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970) “Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 983–987.Google Scholar
Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., … Cuthbert, B. N. (2010) “Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631–639.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Meca, A., & Sauvigné, K. C. (2016) “The role of neuroscience within psychology: A call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness.” American Psychologist, 71, 52–70.Google Scholar
Sharp, P. B., & Miller, G. A. (2019) “Reduction and autonomy in psychology and neuroscience: A call for pragmatism.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(1), 18–31.Google Scholar
Sporns, O. (2013) “The human connectome: Origins and challenges.” NeuroImage, 80, 53–61.Google Scholar
Stephan, K. E., & Mathys, C. (2014) “Computational approaches to psychiatry.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 85–92.Google Scholar
Tabb, K. (2018, May) “Can psychiatry be precise?” Invited lecture at the “Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry V: The Problems of Multiple Levels, Explanatory Pluralism, Reduction and Emergence” conference, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. G., & Sharp, P. B. (2019) “Mechanistic science: A new approach to comprehensive psychopathology research that relates psychological and biological phenomena.” Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 196–215.Google Scholar
Wright, C., & Bechtel, W. (2007) “Mechanisms and psychological explanation.” In Thagard, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Volume 4. Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science (pp. 31–79). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Yang, A. C., & Tsai, S. J. (2017) “New targets for schizophrenia treatment beyond the dopamine hypothesis.” International Journal of Molecular Science, 18, e1689.Google Scholar
Yee, C. M., Javitt, D. C., & Miller, G. A. (2015) “Replacing DSM categorical analyses with dimensional analyses in psychiatry research: The research domain criteria initiative.” JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 1159–1160.Google Scholar

References

Bilder, R. M., Howe, A. G., & Sabb, F. W. (2013) “Multilevel models from biology to psychology: Mission impossible?” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 917–927.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1936) “Testability and meaning.” Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1937) “Testability and meaning—continued.” Philosophy of Science, 4, 104.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) “Response to Lilienfield.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 140–142.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013) “Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 928–937.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001) A mind so rare. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012) “Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research.” Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 903–920.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2010) “The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar
Insel, T. (2013) “Director’s blog: Transforming diagnosis.” Retrieved from www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2005) “‘A gene for’: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(7), 1243–1252.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. (2000) Of two minds: An anthropologist looks at American psychiatry. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1978) “Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716–743.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) “Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 212–215.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016) “From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure.” Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 587–612.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. A. (2017) “Coordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition.” Philosophical Explorations, 20(2), 129–145.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Pettersson, E. (2014) “A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality.” Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 515–540.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2000) Psychological concepts and biological psychiatry: A philosophical analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2015) “Psychiatric disorders: Natural kinds made by the world or practical kinds made by us?” World Psychiatry, 14, 288–290.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2018) “Quantitative classification as (re-)descriptive psychopathology.” World Psychiatry, 17(3), 294–295.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Turkheimer, E., & Schaffner, K. F. (forthcoming) “Defining and redefining phenotypes: Operational definitions as open concepts”. In Wright, A. G. C. & Hallquist, M. N. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of research methods in clinical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×