Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:48:29.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Body Self-Awareness: Multiple Levels or Dynamical Gestalt?

from Section 4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

By
Shaun Gallagher
Edited by
Kenneth S. Kendler ,
Josef Parnas  and
Peter Zachar
Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews some central issues concerning body self-awareness, the sense of ownership, and how these phenomena are modulated in psychopathology. I argue that various aspects of body self-awareness can be organized in a relatively coherent manner by thinking of them in terms of dynamical gestalts. Taking this approach moves us away from thinking of these issues as involving multiple or different levels, or conceiving of them under hierarchical descriptions that refer to ‘top-down’ versus ‘bottom-up’ processes. Thinking of body self-awareness on the model of a dynamical gestalt allows us to see how different forms of pre-reflective and reflective self-awareness are related in a more holistic fashion.

Keywords

body self-awarenesssense of ownershipsense of agencylevels of analysisdynamical systemsdepersonalizationschizophrenia
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 131 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albahari, M. (2016) Analytical Buddhism: The Two-Tiered Illusion of Self. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. (1999) ‘Toward a phenomenology of racial embodiment. Radical Philosophy 95: 15–26.Google Scholar
Babinski, J. (1899) ‘De l’asynergie cérébelleuse.’ Revue de Neurologie 7: 806–816.Google Scholar
Baker, D., Hunter, E., Lawrence, E., Medford, N., Patel, M., Senior, C., Sierra, M., Lambert, M. V., Phillips, M. L., and David, A. S. (2003) ‘Depersonalisation disorder: Clinical features of 204 cases.’ The British Journal of Psychiatry 182(5): 428–433.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2011) ‘Bodily awareness and self-consciousness.’ In Gallagher, S. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Self (pp. 157–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2015) ‘Bodily ownership, bodily awareness and knowledge without observation.’ Analysis 75(1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2017) ‘Ownership and the space of the body.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 117–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A. J., and Eilan, N. (Eds.) (1995) ‘Introduction.’ In The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Berthoz, A. (2000) The Brain’s Sense of Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Billon, A. (2013) ‘Does consciousness entail subjectivity? The puzzle of thought insertion.’ Philosophical Psychology 26(2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billon, A. (2017) ‘Mineness first: Three challenges to the recent theories of the sense of bodily ownership.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 189–216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Billon, A. and Kriegel, U. (2014) ‘Jaspers’ dilemma: The psychopathological challenge to subjectivity theories of consciousness.’ In Gennaro, R. (Ed.), Disturbed Consciousness (pp. 29–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, L. and Broome, M. (2009) ‘A role for ownership and authorship in the analysis of thought insertion.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sorös, P., Müller, H. H. O., and Philipsen, A. (2018) ‘The senses of agency and ownership: A review.’ Frontiers in Psychology 9: 535.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1988) ‘Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory.’ Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1989) ‘Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: A feminist critique of Merleau-Ponty’s. Phenomenology of Perception.’ In Allen, J. and Young, I. M. (Eds.), The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy (pp. 85–100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. and Hopkins, B. (1988) ‘Hand-mouth coordination in the newborn baby.’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (1999) ‘Schizophrenia, the space of reasons and thinking as a motor process.’ The Monist 82(4): 609–625.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (2002) ‘The ownership of thoughts.’ Philosophy Psychology and Psychiatry 9(1): 35–39.Google Scholar
Dainton, B. (2008) The Phenomenal Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vignemont, F. (2007) ‘Habeas corpus: The sense of ownership of one’s own body.’ Mind & Language 22(4): 427–449.Google Scholar
de Vignemont, F. (2017) ‘An agentive conception of the sense of bodily ownership: The bodyguard hypothesis.’ In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter (pp. 217–236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dokic, J. (2003) ‘The sense of ownership: An analogy between sensation and action.’ In Roessler, J. (Ed.), Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 321–344). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (2007) ‘The return of the myth of the mental.’ Inquiry 50(4): 352–365.Google Scholar
Dugas, L. and Moutier, F. (1911) La depersonalization. Paris: Felix Alcon.Google Scholar
Enticott, P. G, Kennedy, H. A., Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B. J., Daskalakis, Z. J., and Fitzgerald, P. B. (2013) ‘Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence against a global ëmirror systemí deficit.’ Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 248.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1982) Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (2008) Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Philcox, R.. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2011) ‘What is optimal about motor control?’ Neuron 72(3): 488–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D. (1992) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. and Done, D. J. (1988) ‘Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia.’ British Journal of Psychiatry 153: 437–443.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. and Gallagher, S. (2002) ‘Models of the pathological mind: An interview with Christopher Frith.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(4): 57–80.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (1996) ‘The moral significance of primitive self-consciousness.’ Ethics 107(1): 129–140.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000) ‘Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 14–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2004) ‘Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: A neurophenomenological critique.’ Psychopathology 37: 8–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2005) How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2011) ‘Time in action.’ In Callender, C. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook on Time (pp. 419–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2012) ‘Multiple aspects in the sense of agency.’ New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2013) ‘Ambiguity in the sense of agency.’ In Clark, A., Kiverstein, J., and Vierkant, T. (Eds.), Decomposing the Will (pp. 118–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Cole, J. (1995) ‘Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject.’ Journal of Mind and Behavior 16: 369–390.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Marcel, A. (1999) ‘The self in contextualized action.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Varela, F. (2003) ‘Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary Volume 29: 93–132.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2012) The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2014) ‘Phenomenological approaches to self-consciousness.’ In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/.Google Scholar
Georgieff, N. and Jeannerod, M. (1998) ‘Beyond consciousness of external events: A ‘who’ system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness.’ Consciousness and Cognition 7: 465–477.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. and Scheerer, M. (1964) Abstract and Concrete Behavior: An Experimental Study with Special Tests. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Reprint of Psychological Monographs 53(2), 1941.Google Scholar
Guillot, M. (2017) ‘I me mine: On a confusion concerning the subjective character of experience.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8(1): 23–53.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. and Eimer, M. (1999) ‘On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements.’ Experimental Brain Research 126: 128–133.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M. (1993) ‘Future-oriented processes in infancy: The case of visual expectations.’ In Granrud, C. (Ed.), Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy (pp. 235–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Happé, F. and Frith, U. (2006) ‘The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders.’ Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(1): 5–25.Google Scholar
Head, H. (1920) Studies in Neurology. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hesnard, A. (1909) Les troubles de la personnalité dans les états d’asthénie psychique. Paris: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2007) ‘The sense of self in the phenomenology of agency and perception.’ Psyche 13: 1–20.Google Scholar
Hohwy, J., Paton, B., and Palmer, C. (2016) ‘Distrusting the present.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(3): 315–335.Google Scholar
Howell, R. J. and Thompson, B. (2017) ‘Phenomenally mine: In search of the subjective character of consciousness.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8(1): 103–127.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1991) On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Collected Works IV. Trans. Brough, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Translation of (1966) Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins (1893–1917). Husserliana 10. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. and Ilundáin-Agurruza, J. (2018) ‘Selfless activity and experience: Radicalizing minimal self-awareness.’ Topoi 1–12.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2001) ‘Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition.’ Neuroimage 14: S103–S109.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2003) ‘Self-generated actions.’ In Maasen, S., Prinz, W., and Roth, G. (Eds.), Voluntary Action: Brains, Minds, and Sociality (pp. 153–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. and Gallagher, S. (2002) ‘From action to interaction.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Leder, D. (1990) The Absent Body. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Leroy, E.-B. (1901) ‘Sur l’illusion dite dépersonalization.’ L’Année Psychologique 8(1): 519–522.Google Scholar
Lew, A. and Butterworth, G. E. (1995) ‘Hand-mouth contact in newborn babies before and after feeding.’ Developmental Psychology 31: 456–463.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. (1966) ‘Cerebral organization and the conscious control of action.’ In Eccles, J. C. (Ed.), Brain and Conscious Experience (pp. 422–445). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013) How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. (1995) ‘Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership.’ In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, T., and Eilan, N. (Eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1935) ‘On depersonalization.’ British Journal of Medical Psychology 15(2): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Landes, D. A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, J. W. (2016) ‘What is the sense of agency and why does it matter?’ Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1272.Google Scholar
Olivardia, R., Pope, H. G. Jr, III Borowiecki, J. J., and Cohane, G. H. (2004) ‘Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression, and eating disorder symptoms.’ Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5(2): 112.Google Scholar
Pacherie, E. (2007) ‘The sense of control and the sense of agency.’ Psyche 13(1), http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/.Google Scholar
Rinehart, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Iansek, R., Enticott, P. G., and Johnson, K. A. (2006) ‘Movement-related potentials in high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder.’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 48(4): 272–277.Google Scholar
Schear, J. C. (2009) ‘Experience and self-consciousness.’ Philosophical Studies 144: 95–105.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. and Chabris, C. F. (1999) ‘Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.’ Perception 28(9): 1059–1074.Google Scholar
Stephens, G. L. and Graham, G. (2000) When Self-Consciousness Breaks: Alien Voices and Inserted Thoughts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., and Newen, A. (2008) ‘Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency.’ Consciousness and Cognition 17(1): 219–239.Google Scholar
Vosgerau, G. and Newen, A.. (2007) ‘Thoughts, motor actions, and the self.’ Mind & Language 22(1): 22–43.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. (2015) ‘The normal, the natural, and the normative: A Merleau-Pontian legacy to feminist theory, critical race theory, and disability studies.’ Continental Philosophy Review 48: 77–93.Google Scholar
Wieseler, C. M. (2016). ‘A Feminist Contestation of Ableist Assumptions: Implications for Biomedical Ethics, Disability Theory, and Phenomenology.’ Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of South Florida. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6433Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995) ‘An internal model for sensorimotor integration.’ Science 269: 1880–1882.Google Scholar
Yancy, G. (2014) ‘White gazes: What it feels like to be en Essence.’ In Lee, E. S. (Ed.), Living Alterities: Phenomenology, Embodiment, and Race (pp. 43–64). Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (2006) ‘Lived body vs. gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity.’ In “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays (pp. 12–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018) ‘Consciousness, self-consciousness, selfhood: A reply to some critics.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9(3): 703–718.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×